-
International Journal of Environmental... Apr 2022This meta-analysis aimed to compare Marfan syndrome (MFS) patients with non-MFS populations based on orofacial health status to combine publicly available scientific... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
This meta-analysis aimed to compare Marfan syndrome (MFS) patients with non-MFS populations based on orofacial health status to combine publicly available scientific information while also improving the validity of primary study findings. A comprehensive search was performed in the following databases: PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, Medline, and Web of Science, for articles published between 1 January 2000 and 17 February 2022. PRISMA guidelines were followed to carry out this systematic review. We used the PECO system to classify people with MFS based on whether or not they had distinctive oral health characteristics compared to the non-MFS population. The following are some examples of how PECO is used: P denotes someone who has MFS; E stands for a medical or genetic assessment of MFS; C stands for people who do not have MFS; and O stands for the orofacial characteristics of MFS. Using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale, independent reviewers assessed the articles' methodological quality and extracted data. Four case-control studies were analyzed for meta-analysis. Due to the wide range of variability, we were only able to include data from at least three previous studies. There was a statistically significant difference in bleeding on probing and pocket depth between MFS and non-MFS subjects. MFS patients are more prone to periodontal tissue inflammation due to the activity of FBN1 and MMPs. Early orthodontic treatment is beneficial for the correction of a narrow upper jaw and a high palate, as well as a skeletal class II with retrognathism of the lower jaw and crowding of teeth.
Topics: Case-Control Studies; Cleft Palate; Humans; Marfan Syndrome; Oral Health
PubMed: 35564443
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19095048 -
Journal of Cardiac Surgery Dec 2021Intrinsic cardiac impairment in Marfan syndrome (MFS) has been explored in many clinical studies; however, their results have been inconsistent. This meta-analysis aimed... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Intrinsic cardiac impairment in Marfan syndrome (MFS) has been explored in many clinical studies; however, their results have been inconsistent. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the difference in cardiac structure and function between Marfan patients and healthy individuals, and to verify the hypothesis of intrinsic cardiac impairment in MFS.
METHODS
Electronic searches for studies were performed in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. Nine studies with 490 patients with MFS and 478 controls were included in the analysis. Age and sex were strictly matched between Marfan patients and healthy controls in every study.
RESULTS
There was no difference in the left ventricular end systolic diameter index (mean difference [MD]: 0.33; 95% confidence interval [CI]: (-0.24, 0.89); p = 0.26) and left ventricular end diastolic diameter index (MD: 0.18; 95% CI: [-0.47, 0.83]; p = 0.58) between Marfan patients and controls. Marfan patients showed larger left ventricular end systolic volume index (MD: 2.62; 95% CI: [0.27, 4.97]; p = 0.03) and left ventricular end diastolic volume index (MD: 4.16; 95% CI: [2.70, 5.63]; p < 0.01) than the control group. Furthermore, Marfan patients showed a lower left ventricular ejection fraction than healthy people (MD: -2.59%; 95% CI: [-4.64%, -0.54%]; p = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS
Intrinsic cardiac impairment was observed in MFS. MFS patients showed the larger left ventricular volume and poorer left ventricular function than matched controls. Considering the potentially adverse impact on cardiac function, intrinsic cardiac impairment in MFS should be considered during the cardiac surgery.
Topics: Diastole; Humans; Marfan Syndrome; Stroke Volume; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left; Ventricular Function, Left
PubMed: 34562283
DOI: 10.1111/jocs.16019 -
Annals of Vascular Surgery Nov 2022Marfan syndrome (MS) most often shows as thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) or aortic dissection, but it may also involve other vascular territories. This study aimed to... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Marfan syndrome (MS) most often shows as thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) or aortic dissection, but it may also involve other vascular territories. This study aimed to identify those extrathoracic vascular manifestations most frequently associated with MS.
METHODS
A systematic review of the literature with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses criteria was carried out. The following databases were included: MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Health Sciences Literature (CINHAL); Spanish database MEDESY Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL).
RESULTS
A total of 10,008 articles were identified, leaving 155 for the first stage of data analysis (total incidence of aneurysms) and 83 for the second (descriptive data analysis). Overall, 518 aneurysms were identified: 149 in the head and neck, 94 in the extremities, and 275 in the aortic, iliac, and visceral sectors. Mostly, they were simultaneously discovered during studies of the TAA. In the abdominal aorta, the presentation with rupture in 11 of 32 patients stands out. Resection and bypass were the most frequently used methods for repair in the treated cases.
CONCLUSIONS
Although its frequency in the general population is unknown, this systematic review suggests that extrathoracic aneurysmal arterial involvement in the MS may be more frequent than expected. We believe screening for aneurysms in other vascular sectors may be advisable, especially in patients with MS and TAA.
Topics: Humans; Marfan Syndrome; Treatment Outcome; Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic; Aortic Dissection; Aorta, Abdominal; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal
PubMed: 36029951
DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2022.08.005 -
Clinical Genetics Jun 2016The purpose of this study was to explore the literature on chronic pain in adults with Marfan syndrome (MFS), critically appraising and synthesizing relevant literature.... (Review)
Review
The purpose of this study was to explore the literature on chronic pain in adults with Marfan syndrome (MFS), critically appraising and synthesizing relevant literature. A systematic review was conducted by searching the published literature databases using available medical, physical, psychological, social databases and other sources. All studies that addressed pain in MFS, published in peer-reviewed journals were assessed. Of 351 search results, 18 articles satisfied the eligibility criteria. All studies were cross-sectional and quantitative; no randomized controlled trials or intervention studies were found. Most studies had small sample sizes, low response rates and mainly dealt with other aspects of the diagnosis than pain. Only one article dealt mainly with pain. The research on chronic pain in MFS is limited in size and quality. Despite these limitations, studies describe that the prevalence of pain in patients with MFS is high, varying from 47 to 92% and affecting several anatomic sites. In addition, chronic pain limits daily function and few studies describe treatment options for pain in patients with MFS. Research is needed to obtain more evidence-based knowledge for developing more appropriate rehabilitation programs for people with MFS.
Topics: Chronic Pain; Cross-Sectional Studies; Fibrillin-1; Genetic Predisposition to Disease; Humans; Marfan Syndrome; Mutation; Quality of Life; Research Design; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 26607862
DOI: 10.1111/cge.12699 -
Medicina Oral, Patologia Oral Y Cirugia... Sep 2016Rare diseases (RD) are those that present a lower prevalence than 5 cases per 10.000 population. The main objective of this review was to study the effect on oral health... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Rare diseases (RD) are those that present a lower prevalence than 5 cases per 10.000 population. The main objective of this review was to study the effect on oral health in rare diseases, while the secondary objective of the study is theme upgrade.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Comparative observational case-control studies were analysed and a systematic review was conducted in PubMed. Each rare disease listed on the statistical data record of the Health Portal of the Ministry of Equality, Health and Social Policies Board of Andalusia was associated with "oral health". The variables studied included dental, oral mucosa and occlusion alterations, oral pathologies (caries, periodontal disease) and other alterations (mouth breathing, parafunctional habits, etc). A bias analysis of the variable caries was conducted.
RESULTS
Six RD were selected through our inclusion and exclusion criteria (hypogammaglobulinemia, Rett syndrome, Marfan syndrome, Prader-Willi syndrome, cystic fibrosis and Cri du chat syndrome) in a total of 8 publications, of which four trials were classified as high risk of bias and one of them as medium risk. There were not trials with low risk of bias.
CONCLUSIONS
The main statistically significant differences found by Syndrome compared to a control group were in Hypogammaglobulinemia with a greater tendency to enamel hypoplasia and dry mouth. The Rett syndrome had, as well, a greater tendency to an anterior open bite, ogival palate, bruxism, mouth breathing and tongue thrusting. Prader-Willi syndrome had a tendency of dental erosion, and Cri du chat syndrome showed a higher association to Tannerella forsythia.
Topics: Bruxism; Cri-du-Chat Syndrome; Dental Caries; Humans; Oral Health; Rare Diseases
PubMed: 27475682
DOI: 10.4317/medoral.20972 -
Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) Sep 2020Marfan syndrome (MFS) is a heritable systemic connective tissue disease with important cardiovascular involvement, including aortic root dilatation and mitral valve... (Review)
Review
Marfan syndrome (MFS) is a heritable systemic connective tissue disease with important cardiovascular involvement, including aortic root dilatation and mitral valve prolapse. Life expectancy in patients with MFS is mainly determined by cardiovascular complications, among which aortic dissection or rupture are most dreaded. In recent years, heart failure and ventricular arrhythmia have drawn attention as extra-aortic cardiovascular manifestations and as additional reported causes of death. Imaging studies have provided data supporting a primary myocardial impairment in the absence of valvular disease or cardiovascular surgery, while studies using ambulatory ECG have demonstrated an increased susceptibility to ventricular arrhythmia. In this paper, current literature was reviewed in order to provide insights in characteristics, pathophysiology and evolution of myocardial function, heart failure and ventricular arrhythmia in MFS.
PubMed: 32992882
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics10100751 -
Endocrine Practice : Official Journal... Jul 2023To investigate bone fragility in patients with hereditary connective tissue disorders (HCTD), including Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS), Marfan's syndrome (MFS) and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
To investigate bone fragility in patients with hereditary connective tissue disorders (HCTD), including Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS), Marfan's syndrome (MFS) and Loeys-Dietz syndrome (LDS).
METHODS
From inception to June 2022, potentially eligible studies were identified in the Medline and EMBASE databases using search strategy that included terms for "HCTD", "Fracture" and "Osteoporosis". Eligible studies must consist of a group of patients with HCTD and report prevalence/incidence of fracture/osteoporosis in their participants, with or without comparison with healthy individuals. Point estimates with standard errors were obtained from each study and combined using the generic inverse variance method.
RESULTS
Among the 4206 articles identified, 19 studies were included. The pooled prevalence of fracture in EDS, MFS, and LDS were 44% (95% confidence interval [CI], 25% to 65%, I 88%), 17% (95% CI, 11% to 26%, I 68%), 69% (95% CI, 47% to 85%, I 83%), respectively. The pooled prevalence of osteoporosis in EDS was 17% (95% CI, 8% to 34%, I 96%). EDS was associated with fracture [pooled odds ratio {OR} 4.90 (95% CI, 1.49 - 16.08, I 86%)], but not osteoporosis [pooled OR 1.34 (95% CI, 0.28 - 6.36, I 87%). One study reported a 5% (95% CI, 3% to 8%) prevalence of osteoporosis in MFS, which was associated with fracture [incidence rate ratio 1.35 (95% CI, 1.18 - 1.55)] and osteoporosis [subhazard ratio 3.97 (95% CI, 2.53 - 6.25)].
CONCLUSION
EDS was associated with fracture, which could be independent of osteoporosis status. MFS had a milder degree of increased risk of fracture and osteoporosis. Despite no data from cohort studies, there was a significantly higher rate of fracture in LDS.
Topics: Humans; Connective Tissue Diseases; Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome; Marfan Syndrome; Loeys-Dietz Syndrome; Osteoporosis; Osteoporotic Fractures; Connective Tissue
PubMed: 36804968
DOI: 10.1016/j.eprac.2023.02.003 -
Clinical Genetics Feb 2015The purpose of this study was to explore the literature on the psychosocial aspects of Marfan syndrome (MFS), to critically appraise and to synthesize relevant... (Review)
Review
The purpose of this study was to explore the literature on the psychosocial aspects of Marfan syndrome (MFS), to critically appraise and to synthesize relevant literature. A mixed-method systematic review was performed by searching the published literature databases using available medical, psychological, pedagogical and social databases and other sources. All studies that addressed psychosocial aspects of MFS, published in peer-reviewed journals were assessed. Of 81 search results, 15 articles (four articles based on same study population) satisfied the eligibility criteria. All studies were cross-sectional; no intervention or randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies were found. Most studies were of small sample sizes, had low response rate or participants without a verified diagnosis. Despite these limitations, all studies described, that MFS has a significant impact on the psychosocial aspects of people's lives: Decreased quality of life; challenges in education, work and family life, depression and anxiety. Some studies indicated that the subjective perception of discomfort did not necessarily match the medical severity of a disease. The research of the psychosocial aspects of MFS is limited in size and quality. More research is needed on the psychosocial aspects of MFS in samples with a verified diagnosis to develop evidence-based knowledge and appropriate guidelines.
Topics: Anxiety; Depression; Humans; Marfan Syndrome; Quality of Life; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 24813698
DOI: 10.1111/cge.12422 -
Medicina Oral, Patologia Oral Y Cirugia... Jul 2019The purpose was to identify and assess the existing scientific evidence from epidemiologic, non-experimental, observational studies of associations between Marfan's... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The purpose was to identify and assess the existing scientific evidence from epidemiologic, non-experimental, observational studies of associations between Marfan's syndrome and oral diseases.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Electronic literature searches in MEDLINE (OVID), The Cochrane Library, Scopus and the Web of Science were conducted to identify all relevant articles. Eligibility was based on inclusion criteria, and quality assessments were conducted. The outcome variables were probing depth, gingival margin, clinical attachment level, bleeding on probing, gingival status, periodontal status, tooth mobility, furcation involvement and decayed, missing and filled teeth index. After extracting data, meta-analyses were carried out.
RESULTS
Out of 527 potentially eligible papers, 3 cross-sectional studies were included. No statistically significant differences were found in the number of sites with bleeding on probing (OR: 1.26; 95% CI: 0.47 to 3.42; P = 0.65; I2: 0%), probing depth (MD: -0.14 mm; 95% CI: -0.24 to 0.53; P = 0.46; I2: 93%), periodontal status (WMD: 0.68 points; 95% CI: -0.48 to 1.83; P = 0.25; I2: 98%) nor number of decayed, missing and filled teeth index score (MD: 1.08 points.; 95% CI: -1.27 to 3.42; P = 0.37; I2: 0%).
CONCLUSIONS
Patients diagnosed with Marfan's syndrome do not seem to have worsened oral health status. Due to the high number of patients with Marfan's syndrome that have prosthetic heart valves, an adequate dental monitoring as well as a strict maintenance therapy program should be implemented.
Topics: Cross-Sectional Studies; Humans; Marfan Syndrome; Oral Health
PubMed: 31232392
DOI: 10.4317/medoral.23037 -
Annals of Vascular Surgery May 2022Several RCTs have been conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) and beta-blocker (BB) therapy for Marfan syndrome (MFS), but the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
Several RCTs have been conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) and beta-blocker (BB) therapy for Marfan syndrome (MFS), but the existing evidence is limited and conflicting. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of different therapies.
METHODS
The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were electronically searched up to March 2021 to retrieve randomized controlled trials regarding the efficacy and safety of ARB-related (including ARB-only and ARB+BB treatment) and BB-only treatment for treating patients with MFS. The revised risk-of-bias tool was used for quality assessment. The odds ratio (OR) and standard mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to estimate the pooled effect size.
RESULTS
Fourteen reports of 9 trials involving 1,449 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Regarding aortic root dilation, the ARB-related regimen has efficacy comparable with that of the BB-only regimen in patients with MFS (pooled SMD = -0.16, 95% CI [-0.33; 0.01]; P = 0.06), while in the ARB+BB vs. BB-only subgroup, a significant difference was observed (pooled SMD = -0.26; 95% CI [-0.40; -0.11]; P < 0.01). In addition, there were no significant differences in other aortic dilation-related measures (aortic root Z scores, ascending aorta, pulmonary artery, aortic annulus, sinotubular junction, aortic arch, thoracic aorta, and abdominal aorta diameter change) or cardiovascular events (aortic dissection, aortic surgery, and death) between the 2 regimens.
CONCLUSION
Our results showed that the clinical efficacy of ARB-only therapy is not inferior to that of BB-only therapy. Moreover, ARB+BB therapy showed superior therapeutic effects without significant adverse effects.
Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Aortic Diseases; Humans; Marfan Syndrome; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 34998935
DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2021.12.073