-
Epilepsy & Behavior : E&B Mar 2018Caffeine is the most commonly used central nervous system (CNS) stimulant. The relationship between caffeine, seizures, epilepsy, and antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) is...
PURPOSE
Caffeine is the most commonly used central nervous system (CNS) stimulant. The relationship between caffeine, seizures, epilepsy, and antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) is complex and not fully understood. Case reports suggest that caffeine triggers seizures in susceptible people. Our systematic review reports on the relationship between caffeine, seizures, and drugs in animal and human studies. Quantitative analyses were also done on animal studies regarding the effects of caffeine on AEDs.
METHODS
PubMed was searched for studies assessing the effects of caffeine on seizure susceptibility, epilepsy, and drug interactions in people and in animal models. To quantify the interaction between AEDs and caffeine, the data of six animal studies were pooled and analyzed using a general linear model univariate analysis or One-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA).
RESULTS
In total, 442 items were identified from which we included 105 studies. Caffeine can increase seizure susceptibility and protect from seizures, depending on the dose, administration type (chronic or acute), and the developmental stage at which caffeine exposure started. In animal studies, caffeine decreased the antiepileptic potency of some drugs; this effect was strongest in topiramate.
CONCLUSION
Preclinical studies suggest that caffeine increases seizure susceptibility. In some cases, chronic use of caffeine may protect against seizures. Caffeine lowers the efficacy of several drugs, especially topiramate. It is unclear how these findings in models can be translated to the clinical condition. Until clinical studies suggest otherwise, caffeine intake should be considered as a factor in achieving and maintaining seizure control in epilepsy.
Topics: Animals; Anticonvulsants; Caffeine; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Drug Interactions; Epilepsy; Humans; Seizures
PubMed: 29414557
DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2017.11.003 -
Epilepsia May 2024Computer vision (CV) shows increasing promise as an efficient, low-cost tool for video seizure detection and classification. Here, we provide an overview of the... (Review)
Review
Computer vision (CV) shows increasing promise as an efficient, low-cost tool for video seizure detection and classification. Here, we provide an overview of the fundamental concepts needed to understand CV and summarize the structure and performance of various model architectures used in video seizure analysis. We conduct a systematic literature review of the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases from January 1, 2000 to September 15, 2023, to identify the strengths and limitations of CV seizure analysis methods and discuss the utility of these models when applied to different clinical seizure phenotypes. Reviews, nonhuman studies, and those with insufficient or poor quality data are excluded from the review. Of the 1942 records identified, 45 meet inclusion criteria and are analyzed. We conclude that the field has shown tremendous growth over the past 2 decades, leading to several model architectures with impressive accuracy and efficiency. The rapid and scalable detection offered by CV models holds the potential to reduce sudden unexpected death in epilepsy and help alleviate resource limitations in epilepsy monitoring units. However, a lack of standardized, thorough validation measures and concerns about patient privacy remain important obstacles for widespread acceptance and adoption. Investigation into the performance of models across varied datasets from clinical and nonclinical environments is an essential area for further research.
Topics: Humans; Seizures; Electroencephalography; Video Recording
PubMed: 38426252
DOI: 10.1111/epi.17926 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Mar 2022This is an updated version of the Cochrane Review previously published in 2019. Epilepsy is one of the most common neurological disorders. It is estimated that up to 30%... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
This is an updated version of the Cochrane Review previously published in 2019. Epilepsy is one of the most common neurological disorders. It is estimated that up to 30% of individuals with epilepsy continue to have epileptic seizures despite treatment with an antiepileptic drug. These patients are classified as drug-resistant and require treatment with a combination of multiple antiepileptic drugs. Brivaracetam is a third-generation antiepileptic drug that is a high-affinity ligand for synaptic vesicle protein 2A. In this review we investigated the use of brivaracetam as add-on therapy for epilepsy.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of brivaracetam when used as add-on treatment for people with drug-resistant epilepsy.
SEARCH METHODS
For the latest update we searched the following databases on 7 September 2021: the Cochrane Register of Studies (CRS Web); MEDLINE (Ovid) 1946 to 3 September 2021. CRS Web includes randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs from PubMed, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and the specialised registers of Cochrane Review Groups including Cochrane Epilepsy.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We searched for parallel-group RCTs that recruited people of any age with drug-resistant epilepsy. We accepted studies with any level of blinding (double-blind, single-blind, or unblinded).
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
In accordance with standard Cochrane methodological procedures, two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion before evaluating trial quality and extracting relevant data. The primary outcome to be assessed was 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency. Secondary outcomes were: seizure freedom, treatment withdrawal for any reason, treatment withdrawal due to adverse events, the proportion of participants who experienced any adverse events, and drug interactions. We used an intention-to-treat population for all primary analyses, and presented results as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
MAIN RESULTS
We did not identify any new studies for this update, therefore the results and conclusions of the review are unchanged. The previous review included six studies involving a total of 2411 participants. Only one study included participants with both focal and generalised onset seizures; the other five trials included participants with focal onset seizures only. Study participants were aged 16 to 80 years. Treatment periods ranged from 7 to 16 weeks. We judged two studies to have low risk of bias and four to have unclear risk of bias. Details on the method used for allocation concealment and how blinding was maintained were insufficient in one study each. One study did not report all outcomes prespecified in the trial protocol, and there were discrepancies in reporting in a further study. Participants receiving brivaracetam add-on were more likely to experience a 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency than those receiving placebo (RR 1.81, 95% CI 1.53 to 2.14; 6 studies; moderate-certainty evidence). Participants receiving brivaracetam were more likely to attain seizure freedom; however, the evidence is of low certainty (RR 5.89, 95% CI 2.30 to 15.13; 6 studies). The incidence of treatment withdrawal for any reason was slightly greater for participants receiving brivaracetam compared to those receiving placebo (RR 1.27, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.74; 6 studies; low-certainty evidence). The risk of participants experiencing one or more adverse events did not differ significantly following treatment with brivaracetam compared to placebo (RR 1.08, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.17; 5 studies; moderate-certainty evidence). However, participants receiving brivaracetam did appear to be more likely to withdraw from treatment due to adverse events compared with those receiving placebo (RR 1.54, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.33; 6 studies; low-certainty evidence).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
When used as add-on therapy for individuals with drug-resistant epilepsy, brivaracetam may be effective in reducing seizure frequency and may aid patients in achieving seizure freedom. However, add-on brivaracetam is probably associated with a greater proportion of treatment withdrawals due to adverse events compared with placebo. It is important to note that only one of the eligible studies included participants with generalised epilepsy. None of the included studies involved participants under the age of 16, and all studies were of short duration. Consequently, the findings of this review are mainly applicable to adult patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy. Future research should focus on investigating the tolerability and efficacy of brivaracetam during longer-term follow-up, as well as assess the efficacy and tolerability of add-on brivaracetam in managing other types of seizures and in other age groups.
Topics: Adult; Anticonvulsants; Drug Resistant Epilepsy; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsy, Generalized; Humans; Pyrrolidinones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Seizures
PubMed: 35285519
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011501.pub3 -
Journal of Neurosurgery Jun 2016OBJECT Meningioma is the most common benign intracranial tumor, and patients with supratentorial meningioma frequently suffer from seizures. The rates and predictors of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECT Meningioma is the most common benign intracranial tumor, and patients with supratentorial meningioma frequently suffer from seizures. The rates and predictors of seizures in patients with meningioma have been significantly under-studied, even in comparison with other brain tumor types. Improved strategies for the prediction, treatment, and prevention of seizures in patients with meningioma is an important goal, because tumor-related epilepsy significantly impacts patient quality of life. METHODS The authors performed a systematic review of PubMed for manuscripts published between January 1980 and September 2014, examining rates of pre- and postoperative seizures in supratentorial meningioma, and evaluating potential predictors of seizures with separate meta-analyses. RESULTS The authors identified 39 observational case series for inclusion in the study, but no controlled trials. Preoperative seizures were observed in 29.2% of 4709 patients with supratentorial meningioma, and were significantly predicted by male sex (OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.30-2.34); an absence of headache (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.04-3.25); peritumoral edema (OR 7.48, 95% CI 6.13-9.47); and non-skull base location (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.04-3.25). After surgery, seizure freedom was achieved in 69.3% of 703 patients with preoperative epilepsy, and was more than twice as likely in those without peritumoral edema, although an insufficient number of studies were available for formal meta-analysis of this association. Of 1085 individuals without preoperative epilepsy who underwent resection, new postoperative seizures were seen in 12.3% of patients. No difference in the rate of new postoperative seizures was observed with or without perioperative prophylactic anticonvulsants. CONCLUSIONS Seizures are common in supratentorial meningioma, particularly in tumors associated with brain edema, and seizure freedom is a critical treatment goal. Favorable seizure control can be achieved with resection, but evidence does not support routine use of prophylactic anticonvulsants in patients without seizures. Limitations associated with systematic review and meta-analysis should be considered when interpreting these results.
Topics: Humans; Meningioma; Seizures; Supratentorial Neoplasms
PubMed: 26636386
DOI: 10.3171/2015.4.JNS142742 -
JAMA Network Open Apr 2023Epilepsy is one of the most common neurologic disorders globally. Cannabidiol (CBD) has been approved for the treatment of epilepsy, but its use has been associated with... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
IMPORTANCE
Epilepsy is one of the most common neurologic disorders globally. Cannabidiol (CBD) has been approved for the treatment of epilepsy, but its use has been associated with several different adverse events (AEs).
OBJECTIVE
To investigate the frequency and risk of AEs developing in patients with epilepsy who are using CBD.
DATA SOURCES
PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched for relevant studies published from database inception up to August 4, 2022. The search strategy included a combination of the following keywords: (cannabidiol OR epidiolex) AND (epilepsy OR seizures).
STUDY SELECTION
The review included all randomized clinical trials that investigated at least 1 AE from the use of CBD in patients with epilepsy.
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
Basic information about each study was extracted. I2 statistics were calculated using Q statistics to assess the statistical heterogeneity among the included studies. A random-effects model was used in cases of substantial heterogeneity, and a fixed-effects model was used if the I2 statistic for the AEs was lower than 40%. This study was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guideline.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
Frequency of each AE and risk of developing each AE in patients with epilepsy using CBD.
RESULTS
Nine studies were included. Overall incidences of 9.7% in the CBD group and 4.0% in the control group were found for any grade AEs. The overall risk ratios (RRs) for any grade and severe grade AEs were 1.12 (95% CI, 1.02-1.23) and 3.39 (95% CI, 1.42-8.09), respectively, for the CBD group compared with the control group. Compared with the control group, the CBD group had a greater risk for incidence of serious AEs (RR, 2.67; 95% CI, 1.83-3.88), AEs resulting in discontinuation (RR, 3.95; 95% CI, 1.86-8.37), and AEs resulting in dose reduction (RR, 9.87; 95% CI, 5.34-14.40). Because most of the included studies had some risk of bias (3 raised some concerns and 3 were at high risk of bias), these findings should be interpreted with some caution.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
In this systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials, the use of CBD to treat patients with epilepsy was associated with an increased risk of several AEs. Additional studies are needed to determine the safe and effective CBD dosage for treating epilepsy.
Topics: Humans; Cannabidiol; Epilepsy; Seizures; Bias
PubMed: 37079302
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.9126 -
International Journal of Geriatric... Jul 2022Dementia and seizures often co-exist, but the association between these two disorders is not well established. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES
Dementia and seizures often co-exist, but the association between these two disorders is not well established. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to clarify the relationship between seizures and dementia.
METHODS
The PubMed, EMBASE, CBM, and CNKI databases were used to search for relevant publications from inception to August 25, 2021. Data extraction was performed by two authors independently. The random-effects model was adopted to evaluate the pooled estimates.
RESULTS
Two nested case-control studies and 18 cohort studies were included in the meta-analysis. Seizures were associated with the development of dementia and Alzheimer's disease (AD), and the pooled relative risk (RR) was 2.51 [95% confidence intervals (CI) = 1.87-3.36, p < 0.001] and 1.61 (95% CI = 1.42-1.82, p < 0.001), respectively. Pooled RR estimating the effect of dementia on seizures risk was 3.68 (95% CI = 3.05-4.44, p < 0.001). In addition, the pooled effect size of dementia on epilepsy risk was 3.02 (95% CI = 2.16-4.23, p < 0.001). The subgroup analyses suggested that vascular risk factors could confound the associations between these two disorders. Seizures might independently and significantly increase the risk of dementia, and in turn, dementia might predispose an individual to a higher risk of seizures.
CONCLUSIONS
These results suggested that dementia and seizures share common pathogenesis and might be treated with similar preventive treatment measures. Vascular changes in patients with dementia or seizures should also be examined.
Topics: Alzheimer Disease; Case-Control Studies; Cohort Studies; Humans; Risk Factors; Seizures
PubMed: 35726376
DOI: 10.1002/gps.5723 -
Neurosurgical Focus Sep 2014Seizures are a common presentation of cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). The authors evaluated the efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for the... (Review)
Review
OBJECT
Seizures are a common presentation of cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). The authors evaluated the efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for the management of seizures associated with AVMs and identified factors influencing seizure outcomes following SRS for AVMs.
METHODS
A systematic literature review was performed using PubMed. Studies selected for review were published in English, included at least 5 patients with both cerebral AVMs and presenting seizures treated with SRS, and provided post-SRS outcome data regarding obliteration of AVMs and/or seizures. Demographic, radiosurgical, radiological, and seizure outcome data were extracted and analyzed. All seizure outcomes were categorized as follows: 1) seizure free, 2) seizure improvement, 3) seizure unchanged, and 4) seizure worsened. Systematic statistical analysis was conducted to assess the effect of post-SRS AVM obliteration on seizure outcome.
RESULTS
Nineteen case series with a total of 3971 AVM patients were included for analysis. Of these, 28% of patients presented with seizures, and data for 997 patients with available seizure outcome data who met the inclusion criteria were evaluated. Of these, 437 (43.8%) patients achieved seizure-free status after SRS, and 530 (68.7%) of 771 patients with available data achieved seizure control (seizure freedom or seizure improvement) following SRS. Factors associated with improved seizure outcomes following SRS for AVMs were analyzed in 9 studies. Seizure-free status was achieved in 82% and 41.0% of patients with complete and incomplete AVM obliteration, respectively. Complete AVM obliteration offered superior seizure-free rates compared with incomplete AVM obliteration (OR 6.13; 95% CI 2.16-17.44; p = 0.0007).
CONCLUSIONS
Stereotactic radiosurgery offers favorable seizure outcomes for AVM patients presenting with seizures. Improved seizure control is significantly more likely with complete AVM obliteration.
Topics: Female; Humans; Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformations; Male; Postoperative Complications; PubMed; Radiosurgery; Seizures
PubMed: 25175436
DOI: 10.3171/2014.6.FOCUS1454 -
Epilepsia Jul 2023Improved quality of life (QoL) is an important outcome goal following epilepsy surgery. This study aims to quantify change in QoL for adults with drug-resistant epilepsy... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Improved quality of life (QoL) is an important outcome goal following epilepsy surgery. This study aims to quantify change in QoL for adults with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) who undergo epilepsy surgery, and to explore clinicodemographic factors associated with these changes. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis using Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. All studies reporting pre- and post-epilepsy surgery QoL scores in adults with DRE via validated instruments were included. Meta-analysis assessed the postsurgery change in QoL. Meta-regression assessed the effect of postoperative seizure outcomes on postoperative QoL as well as change in pre- and postoperative QoL scores. A total of 3774 titles and abstracts were reviewed, and ultimately 16 studies, comprising 1182 unique patients, were included. Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory-31 item (QOLIE-31) meta-analysis included six studies, and QOLIE-89 meta-analysis included four studies. Postoperative change in raw score was 20.5 for QOLIE-31 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 10.9-30.1, I = 95.5) and 12.1 for QOLIE-89 (95% CI = 8.0-16.1, I = 55.0%). This corresponds to clinically meaningful QOL improvements. Meta-regression demonstrated a higher postoperative QOLIE-31 score as well as change in pre- and postoperative QOLIE-31 score among studies of cohorts with higher proportions of patients with favorable seizure outcomes. At an individual study level, preoperative absence of mood disorders, better preoperative cognition, fewer trials of antiseizure medications before surgery, high levels of conscientiousness and openness to experience at the baseline, engagement in paid employment before and after surgery, and not being on antidepressants following surgery were associated with improved postoperative QoL. This study demonstrates the potential for epilepsy surgery to provide clinically meaningful improvements in QoL, as well as identifies clinicodemographic factors associated with this outcome. Limitations include substantial heterogeneity between individual studies and high risk of bias.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Quality of Life; Epilepsy; Seizures; Drug Resistant Epilepsy; Antidepressive Agents
PubMed: 37157209
DOI: 10.1111/epi.17644 -
Acta Neurologica Scandinavica Dec 2021Ictal hypoxaemia is a feature seen in epileptic seizures, characterized by low oxygen saturations, increasing seizure prolongation risk and possibly contributing to... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Ictal hypoxaemia is a feature seen in epileptic seizures, characterized by low oxygen saturations, increasing seizure prolongation risk and possibly contributing to sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP). High flow oxygen is recommended in the management of seizures by UK's National Institute of Health and Care excellence (NICE); however, the evidence supporting this recommendation is unclear.
AIMS
To identify the efficacy of oxygen in the seizure treatment.
METHOD
A scoping review was conducted using PRISMA-ScR guidance. PsycINFO, EMBASE and MEDLINE were searched along with the references section of identified literature. Articles were critically appraised for study, patient, seizure, oxygen therapy and outcome characteristics, summarized and quality-assessed using Sackett's criteria.
RESULTS
Literature search identified 623 articles of which five met the pre-criteria for full review. One animal study demonstrated favourable effects of oxygen administration. Three human studies also reported favourable effects of oxygen administration, while one reported outcomes that were not statistically significant. Study design concerns in all identified literature confounded the ability to assess efficacy. All five publications were assigned Sackett's score of 2b.
CONCLUSION
There is a significant lack of evidence to support the efficacy of oxygen administration in epileptic seizures. Future research is needed.
Topics: Animals; Epilepsy; Humans; Hypoxia; Oxygen; Research Design; Seizures
PubMed: 34309004
DOI: 10.1111/ane.13508 -
Epilepsy Research Dec 2023Several surgical options are available for treating hypothalamic hamartoma-related epilepsy but their respective efficacy and safety profiles are poorly defined. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
Several surgical options are available for treating hypothalamic hamartoma-related epilepsy but their respective efficacy and safety profiles are poorly defined.
METHODS
A literature search identified English-language articles reporting series of patients (minimum 3 patients with a follow-up ≥12 months) operated on by either microsurgery, endoscopic surgery, radiosurgery, radiofrequency thermocoagulation or laser interstitial thermal therapy for hypothalamic hamartoma-related epilepsy. The unit of analysis was each selected study. Pooled rates of seizure freedom and of neurological and endocrinological complications were analyzed using meta-analysis to calculate both fixed and random effects. The results of meta-analyses were compared.
RESULTS
Thirty-nine studies were included. There were 568 and 514 participants for seizure outcome and complication analyses, respectively. The pairwise comparison showed that: i) the proportion of seizure-free cases was significantly lower for radiosurgery as compared to microsurgery, radiofrequency thermocoagulation and laser ablation, and significantly lower for endoscopic surgery as compared to radiofrequency thermocoagulation; ii) the proportion of permanent hypothalamic dysfunction was significantly higher for microsurgery as compared to all other techniques, and significantly lower for endoscopic surgery as compared to radiofrequency thermocoagulation and laser ablation; iii) the incidence of permanent neurological disorders was significantly higher for microsurgery as compared to endoscopic surgery, radiosurgery and radiofrequency thermocoagulation, and significantly lower for radiosurgery as compared to laser ablation.
CONCLUSIONS
Minimally invasive surgical techniques, including endoscopic surgery, radiofrequency thermocoagulation and laser ablation, represent an acceptable compromise between efficacy and safety in the treatment of hypothalamic hamartoma-related epilepsy. Microsurgery and radiosurgery should be considered in carefully selected cases.
Topics: Humans; Epilepsy; Hypothalamic Diseases; Hamartoma; Seizures; Radiosurgery; Treatment Outcome; Magnetic Resonance Imaging
PubMed: 38006630
DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2023.107261