-
Seizure Apr 2021Spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) is associated with high mortality and high morbidity, including seizures. Seizure prophylaxis is "not recommended" by the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
Spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) is associated with high mortality and high morbidity, including seizures. Seizure prophylaxis is "not recommended" by the American Stroke Association, but practice variation still exists due to inconclusive data. We performed a meta-analysis to assess the current relevant literature to determine the efficacy of seizure prophylaxis following ICH.
METHODS
We performed searches of PubMed, Scopus, and Embase up to September 15, 2020. We included observational and randomized controlled studies reporting seizure prophylaxis and occurrence in adults with ICH. Outcomes were seizures, as defined by the authors, within 14 days of ICH and at the longest point of follow-up. We used random-effects models to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) for seizure prophylaxis and outcomes. The PROSPERO registration was CRD42019140493.
RESULTS
We included 8 studies (2852 patients) in our analysis. The mean (± standard deviation) age of the pooled patients was 65 (±4) years; 39 % (± 5%) were female. Seizure prophylaxis did not prevent seizures at the longest follow-up time (OR 0.708, 95 % CI 0.438-1.143, p = 0.158, I2 = 34 %). This result was confirmed in subgroup analyses using categorical variables and in meta-regressions using continuous variables. Additionally, seizure prophylaxis was not associated with preventing early seizures, defined as < 14 days of ICH (OR 0.66, 95 % CI 0.21-2.08, p = 0.48, I2 = 35 %).
CONCLUSION
Seizure prophylaxis following ICH was not associated with seizure prevention in adults. Most included studies were observational. Further randomized controlled trials examining the efficacy of seizure prophylaxis in high-risk patients and different types of antiepileptic drugs are needed.
Topics: Aged; Anticonvulsants; Cerebral Hemorrhage; Female; Humans; Levetiracetam; Male; Middle Aged; Phenytoin; Piracetam; Seizures
PubMed: 33713891
DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2021.02.029 -
Journal of Medical Toxicology :... Jul 2022Cannabis' effect on seizure activity is an emerging topic that remains without consensus and merits further investigation. We therefore performed a scoping review to... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Cannabis' effect on seizure activity is an emerging topic that remains without consensus and merits further investigation. We therefore performed a scoping review to identify the available evidence and knowledge gaps within the existing literature on cannabis product exposures as a potential cause of seizures in humans.
METHODS
A scoping review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. The PubMed and Scopus databases were searched over a 20-year period from the date of the database query (12/21/2020). Inclusion criteria were (1) English language original research articles, (2) inclusion of human subjects, and (3) either investigation of seizures as a part of recreational cannabinoid use OR of exogenous cannabinoids as a cause of seizures.
RESULTS
A total of 3104 unique articles were screened, of which 68 underwent full-text review, and 13 met inclusion/exclusion criteria. Ten of 11 studies evaluating acute cannabis exposures reported a higher seizure incidence than would be expected based on the prevalence of epilepsy in the general and pediatric populations (range 0.7-1.2% and 0.3-0.5% respectively). The remaining two studies demonstrated increased seizure frequency and/or seizure-related hospitalization in recreational cannabis users and those with cannabis use disorder.
CONCLUSIONS
This scoping review demonstrates that a body of literature describing seizures in the setting of cannabis exposure exists, but it has several limitations. Ten identified studies showed a higher than expected incidence of seizures in populations exposed to cannabis products. Based on the Bradford Hill criteria, delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) may be the causative xenobiotic for this phenomenon.
Topics: Cannabinoid Receptor Agonists; Cannabinoids; Cannabis; Child; Hallucinogens; Humans; Seizures
PubMed: 35352276
DOI: 10.1007/s13181-022-00886-3 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Oct 2015This is an updated version of the original Cochrane review published in 2014 (Issue 1). For nearly 30% of people with epilepsy, seizures are not controlled by current... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
This is an updated version of the original Cochrane review published in 2014 (Issue 1). For nearly 30% of people with epilepsy, seizures are not controlled by current treatments. Stiripentol is a new antiepileptic drug (AED) that was developed in France and was approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in 2007 for the treatment of Dravet syndrome as adjunctive therapy with valproate and clobazam, with promising effects.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of stiripentol as add-on treatment for patients with focal refractory epilepsy who are taking AEDs.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Epilepsy Group Specialised Register (10 August 2015), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; August 2015, Issue 8)and MEDLINE (Ovid) (1946 to 10 August 2015). We contacted Biocodex (the manufacturer of stiripentol) and epilepsy experts to identify published, unpublished and ongoing trials.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised controlled add-on trials of stiripentol in patients with focal refractory epilepsy.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Review authors independently selected trials for inclusion and extracted data. Outcomes investigated included 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency, seizure freedom, adverse effects, treatment withdrawal and changes in quality of life.
MAIN RESULTS
On the basis of our selection criteria, we included no new studies in the present review. However, we did include one study from the earlier review (32 children with focal epilepsy). This study adopted a 'responder enriched' design and found no clear evidence of a reduction in seizure frequency (≥ 50% seizure reduction) (risk ratio (RR) 1.51, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81 to 2.82) nor evidence of seizure freedom (RR 1.18, 95% CI 0.31 to 4.43) when add-on stiripentol was compared with placebo. Stiripentol led to a greater risk of adverse effects considered as a whole (RR 2.65, 95% CI 1.08 to 6.47). When specific adverse events were considered, confidence intervals were very wide and showed the possibility of substantial increases and small reductions in risks of neurological (RR 2.65, 95% CI 0.88 to 8.01) or gastrointestinal adverse effects (RR 11.56, 95% CI 0.71 to 189.36). Researchers noted no clear reduction in the risk of study withdrawal (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.30 to 1.47), which was high in both groups (35.0% in add-on placebo and 53.3% in stiripentol group). The external validity of this study was limited because only responders to stiripentol (i.e. patients experiencing a ≥ 50% decrease in seizure frequency compared with baseline) were included in the randomised add-on placebo-controlled double-blind phase. Furthermore, carry-over and withdrawal effects probably influenced outcomes related to seizure frequency. Very limited information derived from the only included study shows that adverse effects considered as a whole seemed to occur significantly more often with add-on stiripentol than with add-on placebo.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Since the last version of this review was published, we have found no new studies. Hence, we have made no changes to the conclusions of this update as presented in the initial review. We can draw no conclusions to support the use of stiripentol as add-on treatment for focal refractory epilepsy. Additional large, randomised, well-conducted trials are needed.
Topics: Anticonvulsants; Child; Dioxolanes; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsies, Partial; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Seizures
PubMed: 26488459
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009887.pub3 -
Seizure Mar 2016The study aims to review systematically the quality of evidence supporting seizure detection devices. The unpredictable nature of seizures is distressing and disabling... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
The study aims to review systematically the quality of evidence supporting seizure detection devices. The unpredictable nature of seizures is distressing and disabling for sufferers and carers. If a seizure can be reliably detected then the patient or carer could be alerted. It could help prevent injury and death.
METHODS
A literature search was completed. Forty three of 120 studies found using relevant search terms were suitable for systematic review which was done applying pre-agreed criteria using PRISMA guidelines. The papers identified and reviewed were those that could have potential for everyday use of patients in a domestic setting. Studies involving long term use of scalp electrodes to record EEG were excluded on the grounds of unacceptable restriction of daily activities.
RESULTS
Most of the devices focused on changes in movement and/or physiological signs and were dependent on an algorithm to determine cut off points. No device was able to detect all seizures and there was an issue with both false positives and missed seizures. Many of the studies involved relatively small numbers of cases or report on only a few seizures. Reports of seizure alert dogs are also considered.
CONCLUSION
Seizure detection devices are at a relatively early stage of development and as yet there are no large scale studies or studies that compare the effectiveness of one device against others. The issue of false positive detection rates is important as they are disruptive for both the patient and the carer. Nevertheless, the development of seizure detection devices offers great potential in the management of epilepsy.
Topics: Algorithms; Animals; Databases, Bibliographic; Diagnosis; Dogs; Electroencephalography; False Positive Reactions; Humans; Movement; Precision Medicine; Seizures
PubMed: 26859097
DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2016.01.013 -
European Neuropsychopharmacology : the... Mar 2023Seizures are suspected to be side effects of antipsychotics. To examine a possible causal relationship, we compared the risk of seizures on second-generation... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Seizures are suspected to be side effects of antipsychotics. To examine a possible causal relationship, we compared the risk of seizures on second-generation antipsychotics to the risk on placebo in randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) across diagnostic groups. The primary outcome was any seizure reported as International Conference on Harmonisation-Good Clinical Practice (ICH-GCP)-defined serious adverse event (SAEs). The risk ratio (RR) with antipsychotics versus placebo was synthesized in a pairwise common effects Mantel-Haenszel meta-analysis. For 314 of 597 idenitified placebo-controlled RCTs information about all SAEs could be retrieved from publications, original investigators, pharmaceutical companies and the European Medical Agency. In those, 37 seizures occurred in 42,600 participants on antipsychotics (0.09%) and 28 in 25,042 participants on placebo (0.11%). The meta-analytic results (RR 0,68; 95% Confidence Interval 0.41-1.12) indicated a reduced risk on antipsychotics with a confidence interval including no difference (i.e. RR=1). Neither in sensitivity analyses (excluding events in the safety-follow-up of trials or first-generation antipsychotics; using odds ratios) nor in subgroup analyses (on specific antipsychotics, drug combinations, diagnostic categories, age groups, and study duration) there was evidence for an increased risk on antipsychotics, except for some weak indications of an increased risk on antipsychotics in older and/or demented participants (RRs 1.11 and 1.48, respectively, but with 95% CIs of 0.35-3.49 and 0.41-5.26 including no difference and subgroup tests with p=0.54 and p=0.66 not indicating differences between age groups or diagnostic categories). Consequently, there are no indications that second-generation antipsychotics cause seizures in middle-aged adults and children in most diagnostic groups; rather our results provide some weak evidence for a protective effect. However, there was no data on SAEs available for clozapine, for which observational studies provide the strongest associations with increased seizure rates, and for older and/or demented patients a small additional risk on antipsychotics cannot be excluded.
Topics: Adult; Middle Aged; Child; Humans; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Clozapine; Seizures
PubMed: 36640732
DOI: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2022.12.010 -
JAMA Neurology May 2024Guidelines recommend seizure prophylaxis for early posttraumatic seizures (PTS) after severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). Use of antiseizure medications for early... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
IMPORTANCE
Guidelines recommend seizure prophylaxis for early posttraumatic seizures (PTS) after severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). Use of antiseizure medications for early seizure prophylaxis after mild or moderate TBI remains controversial.
OBJECTIVE
To determine the association between seizure prophylaxis and risk reduction for early PTS in mild and moderate TBI.
DATA SOURCES
PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science (January 1, 1991, to April 18, 2023) were systematically searched.
STUDY SELECTION
Observational studies of adult patients presenting to trauma centers in high-income countries with mild (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS], 13-15) and moderate (GCS, 9-12) TBI comparing rates of early PTS among patients with seizure prophylaxis with those without seizure prophylaxis.
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) reporting guidelines were used. Two authors independently reviewed all titles and abstracts, and 3 authors reviewed final studies for inclusion. A meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model with absolute risk reduction.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
The main outcome was absolute risk reduction of early PTS, defined as seizures within 7 days of initial injury, in patients with mild or moderate TBI receiving seizure prophylaxis in the first week after injury. A secondary analysis was performed in patients with only mild TBI.
RESULTS
A total of 64 full articles were reviewed after screening; 8 studies (including 5637 patients) were included for the mild and moderate TBI analysis, and 5 studies (including 3803 patients) were included for the mild TBI analysis. The absolute risk reduction of seizure prophylaxis for early PTS in mild to moderate TBI (GCS, 9-15) was 0.6% (95% CI, 0.1%-1.2%; P = .02). The absolute risk reduction for mild TBI alone was similar 0.6% (95% CI, 0.01%-1.2%; P = .04). The number needed to treat to prevent 1 seizure was 167 patients.
CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE
Seizure prophylaxis after mild and moderate TBI was associated with a small but statistically significant reduced risk of early posttraumatic seizures after mild and moderate TBI. The small absolute risk reduction and low prevalence of early seizures should be weighed against potential acute risks of antiseizure medications as well as the risk of inappropriate continuation beyond 7 days.
Topics: Humans; Brain Injuries, Traumatic; Anticonvulsants; Seizures
PubMed: 38587858
DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.0689 -
Seizure Nov 2021In the context of status epilepticus (SE), seizure-induced reversible MRI abnormalities (SRMA) can be difficult to differentiate from epileptogenic pathologies. To... (Review)
Review
In the context of status epilepticus (SE), seizure-induced reversible MRI abnormalities (SRMA) can be difficult to differentiate from epileptogenic pathologies. To identify patterns and characteristics of SRMA, we conducted a systematic review in accordance with the Preferred Items Reporting for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We included publications describing patients (a) presenting with status epilepticus, (b) exhibiting seizure-induced MRI abnormalities, (c) who demonstrated complete resolution of MRI abnormality at follow-up, and (d) who had availability of descriptive MRI results. A total of 49 cases from 19 publications fulfilled our eligibility criteria. Signal abnormalities were most frequently reported on T2-weighted sequences followed by diffusion-weighted and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery imaging. Both unilateral and bilateral SRMA were reported. Unilateral EEG abnormalities were often associated with ipsilateral SRMA. The signal changes appeared during the ictus itself in some subjects whilst the median time to SRMA appearance and resolution were 24 h and 96.5 days, respectively. Based on the distribution of reversible signal alterations, we identified five 'composite patterns': (1) predominant cortical (with or without subcortical, leptomeningeal or thalamic involvement), (2) hippocampal (with or without cortical, subcortical, leptomeningeal, or thalamic involvement), (3) claustrum, (4) predominant subcortical, and (5) splenium involvement. Amongst treatment-responsive SE patients, the cortical pattern was the most prevalent whereas hippocampal involvement was most frequently reported in refractory SE. Cortical atrophy, hippocampal sclerosis, and cortical laminar necrosis were common long-term sequelae after the resolution of SRMA. In this review, we highlight many limitations of the literature and discuss future directions for research.
Topics: Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Electroencephalography; Hippocampus; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Seizures; Status Epilepticus
PubMed: 34525432
DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2021.09.002 -
Computational Intelligence and... 2022Epileptic seizure is one of the most chronic neurological diseases that instantaneously disrupts the lifestyle of affected individuals. Toward developing novel and... (Review)
Review
Epileptic seizure is one of the most chronic neurological diseases that instantaneously disrupts the lifestyle of affected individuals. Toward developing novel and efficient technology for epileptic seizure management, recent diagnostic approaches have focused on developing machine/deep learning model (ML/DL)-based electroencephalogram (EEG) methods. Importantly, EEG's noninvasiveness and ability to offer repeated patterns of epileptic-related electrophysiological information have motivated the development of varied ML/DL algorithms for epileptic seizure diagnosis in the recent years. However, EEG's low amplitude and nonstationary characteristics make it difficult for existing ML/DL models to achieve a consistent and satisfactory diagnosis outcome, especially in clinical settings, where environmental factors could hardly be avoided. Though several recent works have explored the use of EEG-based ML/DL methods and statistical feature for seizure diagnosis, it is unclear what the advantages and limitations of these works are, which might preclude the advancement of research and development in the field of epileptic seizure diagnosis and appropriate criteria for selecting ML/DL models and statistical feature extraction methods for EEG-based epileptic seizure diagnosis. Therefore, this paper attempts to bridge this research gap by conducting an extensive systematic review on the recent developments of EEG-based ML/DL technologies for epileptic seizure diagnosis. In the review, current development in seizure diagnosis, various statistical feature extraction methods, ML/DL models, their performances, limitations, and core challenges as applied in EEG-based epileptic seizure diagnosis were meticulously reviewed and compared. In addition, proper criteria for selecting appropriate and efficient feature extraction techniques and ML/DL models for epileptic seizure diagnosis were also discussed. Findings from this study will aid researchers in deciding the most efficient ML/DL models with optimal feature extraction methods to improve the performance of EEG-based epileptic seizure detection.
Topics: Algorithms; Deep Learning; Electroencephalography; Epilepsy; Humans; Seizures; Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted; Support Vector Machine
PubMed: 35755757
DOI: 10.1155/2022/6486570 -
Pediatric Neurosurgery 2023Peri-insular hemispherotomy (PIH) is a hemispheric separation technique under the broader hemispherotomy group, a surgical treatment for patients with intractable...
INTRODUCTION
Peri-insular hemispherotomy (PIH) is a hemispheric separation technique under the broader hemispherotomy group, a surgical treatment for patients with intractable epilepsy. Hemispherotomy techniques such as the PIH, vertical parasagittal hemispherotomy (VPH), and modified-lateral hemispherotomy are commonly assessed together, despite significant differences in anatomical approach and patient selection. We aim to describe patient selection, outcomes, and complications of PIH in its own right.
METHODS
A systematic review of the literature, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, was conducted, with searches of the PubMed and Embase databases. A local series including patients receiving PIH and followed up at the Queensland Children's Hospital between 2014 and 2020 was included.
RESULTS
Systematic review of the literature identified 393 patients from 13 eligible studies. Engel class 1 outcomes occurred in 82.4% of patients, while 8.6% developed post-operative hydrocephalus. Hydrocephalus was most common in the youngest patient cohorts. Developmental pathology was present in 114 (40.8%) patients, who had fewer Engel 1 outcomes compared to those with acquired pathology (69.1% vs. 83.7%, p = 0.0167). The local series included 13 patients, 11/13 (84.6%) had Engel class 1 seizure outcomes. Post-operative hydrocephalus occurred in 2 patients (15.4%), and 10/13 (76.9%) patients had worsened neurological deficit.
CONCLUSION
PIH delivers Engel 1 outcomes for over 4 in 5 patients selected for this procedure, greater than described in combined hemispherectomy analyses. It is an effective technique in patients with developmental and acquired pathologies, despite general preference of VPH in this patient group. Finally, very young patients may have significant seizure and cognitive benefits from PIH; however, hydrocephalus is most common in this group warranting careful risk-benefit assessment. This review delivers a dedicated PIH outcomes analysis to inform clinical and patient decision-making.
Topics: Child; Humans; Treatment Outcome; Seizures; Drug Resistant Epilepsy; Hemispherectomy; Hydrocephalus
PubMed: 36693334
DOI: 10.1159/000529098 -
Journal of Neuroimaging : Official... May 2022Angiocentric gliomas (AGs) are epileptogenic low-grade gliomas in young patients. We aimed to investigate the MRI findings of AGs and systematically review previous... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Angiocentric gliomas (AGs) are epileptogenic low-grade gliomas in young patients. We aimed to investigate the MRI findings of AGs and systematically review previous publications and three new cases.
METHODS
We searched PubMed, Elsevier's abstract and citation database, and Embase databases and included 50 patients with pathologically proven AGs with analyzable preoperative MRI including 3 patients from our institution and 47 patients from 38 publications (median age, 13 years [range, 2-83 years]; 35 men). Two board-certified radiologists reviewed all images. The relationships between seizure/epilepsy history and MRI findings were statistically analyzed. Moreover, clinical and imaging differences were evaluated between supratentorial and brainstem AGs.
RESULTS
Intratumoral T1-weighted high-intensity areas, stalk-like signs, and regional brain parenchymal atrophy were observed in 23 out of 50 (46.0%), 10 out of 50 (20.0%), and 14 out of 50 (28.0%) patients, respectively. Intratumoral T1-weighted high-intensity areas were observed significantly more frequently in patients with stalk-like signs (positive, 9/10 vs. negative, 14/40, p = .0031) and regional atrophy (13/14 vs. 10/36, p = .0001). There were significant relationships between the length of seizure/epilepsy history and presence of intratumoral T1-weighted high-intensity area (median 3 years vs. 0.5 years, p = .0021), stalk-like sign (13.5 vs. 1 year, p < .0001), and regional atrophy (14 vs. 0.5 years, p < .0001). Patients with brainstem AGs (n = 7) did not have a seizure/epilepsy history and were significantly younger than those with supratentorial AGs (median, 5 vs. 13 years, p < .0001, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS
Intratumoral T1-weighted high-intensity areas, stalk-like signs, and regional brain atrophy were frequent imaging features in AG. We also found that affected age was different between supratentorial and brainstem AGs.
Topics: Adolescent; Atrophy; Brain Neoplasms; Female; Glioma; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Neuroimaging; Seizures
PubMed: 35201652
DOI: 10.1111/jon.12983