-
Journal of Clinical Neuroscience :... May 2024Facial nerve hemangiomas (FNHs) are rare tumors that primarily occur near the geniculate ganglion in the temporal bone. Despite their rarity, they can cause significant... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Facial nerve hemangiomas (FNHs) are rare tumors that primarily occur near the geniculate ganglion in the temporal bone. Despite their rarity, they can cause significant facial nerve dysfunction. The optimal management approach for FNHs remains uncertain, with surgery being the mainstay but subject to debate regarding the extent of resection and preservation of the facial nerve.
METHODS
Systematic review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We queried the PubMed/Medline (accessed on 5 March 2024) electronic database using combinations of the following search terms and words text: "geniculate ganglion hemangioma", "ganglional hemangioma", "hemangioma of the facial nerve", "facial hemangioma", and "intratemporal hemangioma".
RESULTS
We identified a total of 30 literatures (321 patients). The most common site involved for the facial nerve hemangioma was the geniculate ganglion area followed by internal auditory canal, tympanic segment, labyrinthine segment and mastoid involvement. All patients were treated with conservative management or surgery. We report a 48-year-old female patient with HB grade 2 facial palsy and hemifacial spasm underwent SRS using Cyberknife technology. The treatment targeted the FNH in the left internal acoustic canal near the geniculate ganglion. Six months post-treatment, clinical improvement was evident, and lesion control was confirmed in a follow-up brain MRI.
CONCLUSION
The rarity of FNHs contributes to the lack of consensus on optimal management. This illustrative case demonstrates the feasibility of SRS as a standalone treatment for FNHs.
PubMed: 38823231
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2024.05.023 -
Neurosurgical Review Jul 2023Proton beam therapy is considered, by some authors, as having the advantage of delivering dose distributions more conformal to target compared with stereotactic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
Proton beam therapy is considered, by some authors, as having the advantage of delivering dose distributions more conformal to target compared with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Here, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of proton beam for VSs, evaluating tumor control and cranial nerve preservation rates, particularly with regard to facial and hearing preservation.
METHODS
We reviewed, using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) articles published between 1968 and September 30, 2022. We retained 8 studies reporting 587 patients.
RESULTS
Overall rate of tumor control (both stability and decrease in volume) was 95.4% (range 93.5-97.2%, p heterogeneity= 0.77, p<0.001). Overall rate of tumor progression was 4.6% (range 2.8-6.5%, p heterogeneity < 0.77, p<0.001). Overall rate of trigeminal nerve preservation (absence of numbness) was 95.6% (range 93.5-97.7%, I = 11.44%, p heterogeneity= 0.34, p<0.001). Overall rate of facial nerve preservation was 93.7% (range 89.6-97.7%, I = 76.27%, p heterogeneity<0.001, p<0.001). Overall rate of hearing preservation was 40.6% (range 29.4-51.8%, I = 43.36%, p heterogeneity= 0.1, p<0.001).
CONCLUSION
Proton beam therapy for VSs achieves high tumor control rates, as high as 95.4%. Facial rate preservation overall rates are 93%, which is lower compared to the most SRS series. Compared with most currently reported SRS techniques, proton beam radiation therapy for VSs does not offer an advantage for facial and hearing preservation compared to most of the currently reported SRS series.
Topics: Humans; Neuroma, Acoustic; Proton Therapy; Hearing; Cranial Nerves; Facial Nerve; Radiosurgery; Treatment Outcome; Follow-Up Studies; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 37402894
DOI: 10.1007/s10143-023-02060-x -
Otology & Neurotology : Official... Jul 2021Nimodipine has emerged as a promising strategy for protection of cranial nerves following vestibular schwannoma (VS) resections. Our goal was to conduct a comprehensive... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
Nimodipine has emerged as a promising strategy for protection of cranial nerves following vestibular schwannoma (VS) resections. Our goal was to conduct a comprehensive analysis of clinical studies to determine the therapeutic efficacy of nimodipine in improving facial nerve and cochlear nerve function.
DATABASE REVIEWED
We searched PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Clinical Trial Registry, Clinicaltrials.gov, World Health Organization's International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and EU Clinical Trials Registry to identify clinical studies up to May 11, 2020.
METHODS
We included studies evaluating perioperative administration of nimodipine as a strategy to prevent or treat facial nerve or cochlear nerve dysfunction following VS resections. Primary outcomes included preservation or recovery of House-Brackman scale for facial nerve function and Hearing and Equilibrium Guidelines for cochlear nerve function at the latest follow-up visit. Secondary outcomes included adverse events and administration strategies of nimodipine.
RESULTS
Nine studies (603 patients) met inclusion, of which seven studies (559 patients) were included in the quantitative analysis. Overall, nimodipine significantly increased the odds of cranial nerve recovery compared with controls (odds ratio [OR] 2.87, 95% confidence intervals [CI] [2.08, 3.95]; I2 = 0%). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that nimodipine was only effective for cochlear nerve preservation (OR 2.78, 95% CI [1.74, 4.45]; I2 = 0%), but not for facial nerve function (OR 4.54, 95% CI [0.25, 82.42]; I2 = 33%).
CONCLUSION
Although there is evidence supporting the perioperative role of nimodipine for VS resections, more studies are warranted to help clarify the effects of nimodipine therapy on cranial nerve preservation.
Topics: Cochlear Nerve; Facial Nerve; Hearing; Hearing Tests; Humans; Nimodipine
PubMed: 33710143
DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003101 -
World Neurosurgery Feb 2017Synchronous tumors of the cerebellopontine angle (CPA) are very rare and inconsistently described. We present 2 cases of contiguous vestibular schwannoma (VS) and... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Synchronous tumors of the cerebellopontine angle (CPA) are very rare and inconsistently described. We present 2 cases of contiguous vestibular schwannoma (VS) and meningioma and a systematic literature review of all multiple CPA tumors.
METHODS
Retrospective chart review and systematic literature review were performed.
RESULTS
A 64-year-old woman and a 42-year-old man presented with symptoms referable to the CPA. Magnetic resonance imaging in both patients revealed 2 separate contiguous tumors. Retrosigmoid craniotomy and tumor removal in each case confirmed VS and meningioma. Systematic literature review identified 42 previous English-language publications describing 46 patients with multiple CPA tumors. Based on Frassanito criteria, there were 4 concomitant tumors (8%), 16 contiguous tumors (33%), 3 collision tumors (6%), 13 mixed tumors (27%), and 11 tumor-to-tumor metastases (23%). Extent of resection was gross total in 16 cases and subtotal in 16 cases (50% each). Unfavorable House-Brackmann grade III-VI function was documented in 27% overall and in 33% of patients with VS and meningioma, a marked increase from the observed range in isolated VS.
CONCLUSIONS
Multiple CPA tumors are rare, heterogeneous lesions with a marked predisposition toward poor facial nerve outcomes, potentially attributable to a paracrine mechanism that simultaneously drives multiple tumor growth and increases invasiveness or adhesiveness at the facial nerve-tumor interface. Preceding nomenclature has been confounding and inconsistent; we recommend classifying all multiple CPA tumors as "synchronous tumors," with "schwannoma with meningothelial hyperplasia" or "tumor-to-tumor metastases" reserved for rare, specific circumstances.
Topics: Adult; Cerebellar Neoplasms; Cerebellopontine Angle; Craniotomy; Female; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Meningeal Neoplasms; Meningioma; Middle Aged; Neoplasms, Multiple Primary; Neuroma, Acoustic; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 27836701
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.11.002 -
Neurosurgical Review Aug 2021Most studies reported that cystic vestibular schwannoma (CVS) surgery has a less favourable prognosis than solid vestibular schwannoma (SVS) surgery. However, some... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Most studies reported that cystic vestibular schwannoma (CVS) surgery has a less favourable prognosis than solid vestibular schwannoma (SVS) surgery. However, some studies report that it is unclear whether surgical outcomes for these conditions exhibit significant differences. The aim of this meta-analysis was to pool the current literature and describe and analyse any differences in the clinical symptoms and surgical outcomes among CVS and SVS. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines through April 22, 2020. Outcomes were analysed using a meta-analysis of the proportions. The results of the search yielded 17 studies that met the criteria for inclusion and analysis, involving 3074 participants (including 821 patients with CVSs and 2253 patients with SVSs). No significant differences in the extent of tumour resection (gross-total resection versus non-gross-total resection; RR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.86-1.01; p = 0.096) and most other outcomes were noted between CVS and SVS cohorts. However, facial nerve function (House-Brackmann Grade I or II versus III or more) of CVS patients was worse (RR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.78-0.93; p < 0.001) compared with SVS patients with more than 1 year of follow-up after surgery. The criteria of cystic acoustic neuroma needs to be further unified, and prospective cohort studies with larger sample sizes should be performed for further verification of these results in the future.
Topics: Facial Nerve; Humans; Neuroma, Acoustic; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 33009643
DOI: 10.1007/s10143-020-01400-5 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Dec 2014Vestibular schwannomas (acoustic neuromas) are common benign tumours that arise from the Schwann cells of the vestibular nerve. Management options include observation... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Vestibular schwannomas (acoustic neuromas) are common benign tumours that arise from the Schwann cells of the vestibular nerve. Management options include observation with neuroradiological follow-up, microsurgical resection and stereotactic radiotherapy.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effect of stereotactic radiotherapy compared to observation, microsurgical resection, any other treatment modality, or a combination of two or more of the above approaches for vestibular schwannoma.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials; PubMed; EMBASE; CINAHL; Web of Science; CAB Abstracts; ISRCTN and additional sources for published and unpublished trials. The date of the search was 24 July 2014.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) exploring the efficacy of stereotactic radiotherapy compared with observation alone, microsurgical resection or any other possible treatment or combination of treatments in patients with a cerebellopontine angle tumour up to 3 cm in diameter, presumed to be a vestibular schwannoma.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We used the standard methodological procedures expected by The Cochrane Collaboration.
MAIN RESULTS
No studies met the inclusion criteria for this review.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
There is no high quality evidence in the literature from RCTs to determine whether stereotactic radiotherapy is better than microsurgical resection or observation alone for patients with a vestibular schwannoma. In the absence of such evidence, the treatment method should be chosen on an individual basis, taking into consideration the patient's preferences, clinician experience and the availability of radiotherapeutic equipment. With the growing availability of radiotherapeutic equipment, randomised controlled trials should be undertaken to evaluate the role of stereotactic radiotherapy in comparison with other treatment options.
Topics: Humans; Neuroma, Acoustic; Radiosurgery
PubMed: 25511415
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009897.pub2 -
British Journal of Neurosurgery Apr 2023Vestibular schwannoma is a common pathology encountered by neurosurgeons worldwide. Often vestibular schwannoma presents with obstructive hydrocephalus. Papilledema is... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Vestibular schwannoma is a common pathology encountered by neurosurgeons worldwide. Often vestibular schwannoma presents with obstructive hydrocephalus. Papilledema is present in 8% of the patients with vestibular schwannoma, primarily due to obstructive hydrocephalus. Hyperproteinorrhachia is believed to be responsible for papilledema in the absence of hydrocephalus in vestibular schwannoma. However, there is a paucity of literature on the mechanism of papilledema in vestibular schwannoma patients with hydrocephalus.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study was to conduct a scoping review of scientific literature on papilledema in vestibular schwannoma patients without hydrocephalus.
METHODS
Design: This was a systematic scoping review and critical appraisal. Literature Search from PubMed was done following PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) and Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines for conducting and reporting scoping reviews.
RESULTS
A total of seven studies, including eight patients, were identified for inclusion in the review. The studies were heterogeneous in terms of reporting for various variables. All the included studies were case reports, with the earliest publication in 1954 and the latest publication in 2020. The mean age of the patients in the included studies was 35 years, with a minimum age of 20 years and maximum age of 64 years. Approximately 62.5% were females, and 37.5% were males in the included study. Only three studies have studied cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) proteins levels in these patients.
CONCLUSIONS
There is paucity in literature and a lack of evidence to conclusively state hyperproteinorrhachia as an antecedent to the development of papilledema in vestibular schwannoma patients without hydrocephalus. Younger age and female gender are risk factors for developing papilledema in the absence of hydrocephalus in vestibular schwannoma patients. Brainstem compression due to the large size of vestibular schwannoma can still have a patent aqueduct of Sylvius and no obstruction to CSF flow. The development of papilledema in vestibular schwannoma is a complex interplay of multiple factors that must be studied comprehensively for complete understanding.
Topics: Male; Humans; Female; Adult; Young Adult; Middle Aged; Neuroma, Acoustic; Papilledema; Hydrocephalus; Cerebrospinal Fluid Proteins; Cerebral Ventricles
PubMed: 35174747
DOI: 10.1080/02688697.2022.2039376 -
Neurosurgery Jun 2023Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is one of the main treatment options in the management of small to medium size vestibular schwannomas (VSs), because of high tumor... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is one of the main treatment options in the management of small to medium size vestibular schwannomas (VSs), because of high tumor control rate and low cranial nerves morbidity. Series reporting long-term hearing outcome (>3 years) are scarce.
OBJECTIVE
To perform a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis, with the aim of focusing on long-term hearing preservation after SRS.
METHODS
Using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we reviewed articles published between January 1990 and October 2020 and referenced in PubMed or Embase. Inclusion criteria were peer-reviewed clinical study or case series of VSs treated with SRS (single dose), reporting hearing outcome after SRS with a median or mean audiometric follow-up of at least 5 years. Hearing preservation, cranial nerves outcomes, and tumor control were evaluated.
RESULTS
Twenty-three studies were included. Hearing preservation was found in 59.4% of cases (median follow-up 6.7 years, 1409 patients). Main favorable prognostic factors were young age, good hearing status, early treatment after diagnosis, small tumor volume, low marginal irradiation dose, and maximal dose to the cochlea. Tumor control was achieved in 96.1%. Facial nerve deficit and trigeminal neuropathy were found in 1.3% and 3.2% of patients, respectively, both significantly higher in Linear Accelerator series than Gamma Knife series ( P < .05).
CONCLUSION
Long-term hearing preservation remains one of the main issues after SRS, with a major impact on health-related quality of life. Our meta-analysis suggests that hearing preservation can be achieved in almost 60% of patients after a median follow-up of 6.7 years, irrespective of the technique.
Topics: Humans; Neuroma, Acoustic; Radiosurgery; Treatment Outcome; Quality of Life; Hearing; Follow-Up Studies; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 36735500
DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002354 -
The Laryngoscope Jun 2023To evaluate speech outcomes and facial nerve stimulation (FNS) rates in patients with far advanced otosclerosis (FAO) after cochlear implantation. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate speech outcomes and facial nerve stimulation (FNS) rates in patients with far advanced otosclerosis (FAO) after cochlear implantation.
METHODS
A systematic review was performed using standardized methodology of Medline, EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases. Studies were included if adults with FAO underwent cochlear implantation. Exclusion criteria included concurrent otologic history (e.g., Meniere's disease, superior canal dehiscence), non-English-speaking implant users, case reports, abstracts, and letters/commentaries. Bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort studies and the National Institute of Health Scale for case series. The primary outcome measure was speech discrimination and the secondary outcomes were rates of partial insertion and FNS.
RESULTS
Twenty-seven studies evaluated cochlear implantation in FAO. Due to the heterogeneity of testing methods, statistical pooling of speech discrimination was not feasible, but qualitative synthesis indicated a positive effect of implantation. Pooled rates of FNS were 18% (95% confidence interval, CI 12%-27%) and the rate of partial insertion was 10% (95% CI 7%-15%).
CONCLUSION
Cochlear implantation in FAO demonstrates significant gains in speech discrimination scores with higher rates of FNS and partial insertion. Laryngoscope, 133:1288-1296, 2023.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Cochlear Implantation; Otosclerosis; Retrospective Studies; Meniere Disease; Facial Nerve; Cochlear Implants; Speech Perception; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 36082830
DOI: 10.1002/lary.30386 -
Laryngoscope Investigative... Oct 2023To systematically review the prevalence and risk factors of inadvertent facial nerve stimulation (FNS) after cochlear implant (CI) surgery. And to report the different... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
To systematically review the prevalence and risk factors of inadvertent facial nerve stimulation (FNS) after cochlear implant (CI) surgery. And to report the different management strategies used for reducing and resolving FNS.
DATA SOURCE
Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Virtual Health Library (VHL) of the World Health Organization (WHO).
REVIEW METHODS
A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) on studies that reported FNS as a complication after CI. A comprehensive electronic search strategy was used to identify the relevant articles. We extracted the data on the prevalence of FNS after CI activation, the reported grades, and the management strategies. The number of associated electrodes; cause of deafness; co-anomalies; and duration of hearing loss and their relationships with FNS were also studied.
RESULTS
Twenty-one relevant articles were included in this review. The prevalence of FNS among the CI populations was 5.29% (175/3306 patients). Among those whose ages were reported, 58.3% (95/163) were adults, and 41.7% (68/163) were pediatrics. Modifying the different fitting parameters was the most used strategy, as it successfully resolved FNS in 85.5% of the patients (142/166). The second commonly used management strategy was surgical intervention (reimplantation or explantation), which was reported in seven studies for 23 patients.
CONCLUSION
FNS after CI activation could be controlled and resolved with many advances that range from readjusting the fitting parameters to surgical intervention. However, further studies are required to validate the efficacy of each management strategy and its impact on patients' performance. Our findings demonstrate that CI recipients with FNS could still benefit from the CI devices and their FNS could be controlled.
PubMed: 37899846
DOI: 10.1002/lio2.1121