-
Otology & Neurotology : Official... Aug 2022This study aimed to establish hearing outcomes after cochlear implantation in patients with otosclerosis.
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to establish hearing outcomes after cochlear implantation in patients with otosclerosis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We conducted a systematic review and narrative synthesis. Databases searched were as follows: MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Collection, and ClinicalTrials.gov . No limits were placed on language or year of publication. The review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement.
RESULTS
Searches identified 474 abstracts and 180 full texts, with 68 studies meeting the inclusion criteria and reporting outcomes in a minimum of 481 patients with at least 516 implants. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were reported in five studies involving 51 patients. Intraoperative adverse events/surgical approach details and preoperative radiological assessment were reported in 46 and 38 studies, respectively. The methodological quality of included studies was modest, predominantly consisting of case reports and noncontrolled case series with small numbers of patients. Most studies were Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine grade IV.
DISCUSSION
Access to good rehabilitation support is essential to achieving the good hearing outcomes and PROMs that can be expected by 12 months after implantation in most cases. There was a significant association between the radiological severity of otosclerosis and an increase in surgical and postoperative complications. Postoperative facial nerve stimulation can occur and may require deactivation of electrodes and subsequent hearing detriment.
CONCLUSIONS
Hearing outcomes are typically good, but patients should be counseled on associated surgical complications that may compromise hearing. Modern diagnostic techniques may help to identify potentially difficult cases to aid operative planning and patient counseling. Further work is needed to characterize PROMs in this population.
Topics: Cochlear Implantation; Cochlear Implants; Facial Nerve; Hearing; Humans; Otosclerosis
PubMed: 35861644
DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003574 -
International Journal of Molecular... Nov 2016Animal studies have evidenced protection of the auditory nerve by exogenous neurotrophic factors. In order to assess clinical applicability of neurotrophic treatment of... (Review)
Review
Animal studies have evidenced protection of the auditory nerve by exogenous neurotrophic factors. In order to assess clinical applicability of neurotrophic treatment of the auditory nerve, the safety and efficacy of neurotrophic therapies in various human disorders were systematically reviewed. Outcomes of our literature search included disorder, neurotrophic factor, administration route, therapeutic outcome, and adverse event. From 2103 articles retrieved, 20 randomized controlled trials including 3974 patients were selected. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (53%) was the most frequently reported indication for neurotrophic therapy followed by diabetic polyneuropathy (28%). Ciliary neurotrophic factor (50%), nerve growth factor (24%) and insulin-like growth factor (21%) were most often used. Injection site reaction was a frequently occurring adverse event (61%) followed by asthenia (24%) and gastrointestinal disturbances (20%). Eighteen out of 20 trials deemed neurotrophic therapy to be safe, and six out of 17 studies concluded the neurotrophic therapy to be effective. Positive outcomes were generally small or contradicted by other studies. Most non-neurodegenerative diseases treated by targeted deliveries of neurotrophic factors were considered safe and effective. Hence, since local delivery to the cochlea is feasible, translation from animal studies to human trials in treating auditory nerve degeneration seems promising.
Topics: Animals; Cochlear Nerve; Humans; Nerve Growth Factors; Neurodegenerative Diseases; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 27898033
DOI: 10.3390/ijms17121981 -
World Neurosurgery Jan 2018Neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) is an autosomal dominant disease characterized by bilateral vestibular schwannomas (VSs). NF2-associated VSs (NF2-VSs) are routinely... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Review
OBJECTIVE
Neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) is an autosomal dominant disease characterized by bilateral vestibular schwannomas (VSs). NF2-associated VSs (NF2-VSs) are routinely treated with microsurgery; however, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has emerged as an effective alternative in recent decades. To elucidate the role of SRS in NF2-VSs, a systematic review of the literature was conducted to compare outcomes of SRS versus surgery.
METHODS
PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane databases were queried using relevant search terms. Retrospective studies investigating outcomes of NF2-VS patients treated with either SRS or surgery were included. Single-patient case reports were excluded. Outcome measures between the SRS and surgery groups were compared using χ 2-sample tests for equality of proportions on the pooled patient data.
RESULTS
A total of 974 patients (485 SRS, 489 surgery) were identified. The mean 5-year local control rate for SRS was 75.1%, and the mean recurrence rate for surgery was 8.1%. The mean hearing and facial nerve preservation rates were 40.1% and 92.3%, respectively, for SRS and 52.0% and 75.7%, respectively, for surgery. Rates of hearing preservation were higher after surgery than after SRS (P = 0.006), whereas rates of facial nerve preservation were higher after SRS than after surgery (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
SRS appears to be a safe and effective alternative to surgery for NF2-VS. Although rates of hearing preservation were higher in the surgery cohorts, SRS demonstrated high rates of local control and significantly lower facial nerve complications. Certain patients may therefore benefit more from SRS than surgery.
Topics: Facial Nerve Diseases; Hearing Loss; Humans; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Neurofibromatosis 2; Neuroma, Acoustic; Neurosurgical Procedures; Postoperative Complications; Radiosurgery
PubMed: 28882713
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.08.159 -
Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery 2021Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) secondary to tumors is encountered in up to 6% of patients with facial pain syndromes and is considered to be associated with tumors affecting... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) secondary to tumors is encountered in up to 6% of patients with facial pain syndromes and is considered to be associated with tumors affecting the trigeminal nerve pathways. The most frequent are meningiomas and vestibular schwannomas (VS). Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has emerged as a valuable treatment, with heterogeneity of clinical results. We sought to review the medical literature on TN treated with SRS for meningiomas and VS and investigate the rates of improvement of TN symptoms.
METHODS
We reviewed articles published between January 1990 and December 2019 in PubMed. Pain relief after SRS, the maintenance of pain relief, and TN recurrence and complications were evaluated with separate meta-analyses, taking into account the data on individual patients.
RESULTS
Pain relief after SRS was reported as Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) pain intensity scores of BNI I in 50.5% (range 36-65.1%) of patients and BNI I-IIIb in 83.8% (range 77.8-89.8%). There was no significant difference in series discussing outcomes for tumor targeting versus tumor and nerve targeting. Recurrences were described in 34.7% (range 21.7-47.6; tumor targeting). Maintenance of BNI I was reported in 36.4% (range 20.1-52.7) and BNI I-IIIb in 41.2% (range 29.8-52.7; tumor targeting series). When both the nerve and the tumor were targeted, only 1 series reported 86.7% with BNI I-IIIb at last follow-up. Complications were encountered in 12.6% (range 6.3-18.8; tumor targeting series) of patients; however, they were much higher, as high as 26.7%, in the only study reporting them after targeting both the nerve and the tumor. The most common complication was facial numbness.
CONCLUSION
SRS for TNB secondary to benign tumors, such as meningiomas and VS, is associated with favorable clinical course, but less favorable than in idiopathic TN. There was, however, heterogeneity among reports and targeting approaches. Although targeting both the nerve and the tumor seemed to achieve better long-term results, the rate of complications was much higher and the number of patients treated was limited. Future clinical studies should focus on the standard reporting of clinical outcomes and randomization of targeting methods.
Topics: Humans; Meningeal Neoplasms; Meningioma; Neuroma, Acoustic; Pain Management; Radiosurgery; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Trigeminal Neuralgia
PubMed: 32906130
DOI: 10.1159/000509842 -
Clinical Otolaryngology : Official... Nov 2022To review the role of the endoscope in cochlear implantation (CI). (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
To review the role of the endoscope in cochlear implantation (CI).
METHODS
MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar and the Cochrane Library databases, as well as other sources, were searched by two independent reviewers. Studies including patients undergoing either exclusively endoscopic or endoscopically assisted CI were eligible for inclusion. Endoscopic CI approaches and postoperative complications were the primary outcomes. Secondary endpoints included the degree of round window (RW) microscopic visualisation according to St Thomas' Hospital classification and type of cochleostomy for electrode insertion in the scala tympani (ST).
RESULTS
Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria comprising 191 endoscopic or endoscopically assisted CI cases. The endoscope was used for better visualisation of the RW across all included studies, facilitated the insertion of the electrode in the ST and spared a mastoidectomy in a number of cases. No facial nerve palsy was reported in any of the studies. The most common complication was external auditory canal/tympanic membrane tear followed by chorda tympani injury.
CONCLUSION
The microscopic CI approach is still the gold standard. The endoscope facilitates the recognition of the RW area and leads to successful and safe implantation, particularly in difficult anatomical scenarios, ear malformations and advanced otosclerosis. Endoscopically assisted CI procedures offer the opportunity to avoid a posterior tympanotomy and reduce the risk of facial nerve injury. To date, the lack of long-term data does not permit the widespread adoption of completely endoscopic CI procedures without a mastoidectomy.
Topics: Cochlear Implantation; Cochlear Implants; Endoscopes; Humans; Round Window, Ear; Scala Tympani
PubMed: 34971491
DOI: 10.1111/coa.13909 -
Brain Sciences Oct 2021Several electrical stimulation patterns of the auditory nerve have been described for tinnitus relief, but there is no consensus on the most effective stimulation... (Review)
Review
Several electrical stimulation patterns of the auditory nerve have been described for tinnitus relief, but there is no consensus on the most effective stimulation pattern. Therefore, we aim to systematically review the literature on the effect of intra- and extracochlear electrical stimulation patterns as a treatment option for patients with tinnitus. Only studies on intra- and extracochlear electrical stimulation for patients with tinnitus were included if the stimulation used did not concern standardized CI stimulation patterns to primarily rehabilitate hearing loss as intervention. A total of 34 studies met the inclusion criteria, with 10 studies (89 patients) on intracochlear electrical stimulation and 25 studies on extracochlear electrical stimulation (1109 patients). There was a high to medium risk of bias in 22 studies, especially due to lack of a non-exposed group and poor selection of the exposed group. All included studies showed subjective tinnitus improvement during or after electrical stimulation, using different stimulation patterns. Due to methodological limitations and low reporting quality of the included studies, the potential of intra- and extracochlear stimulation has not been fully explored. To draw conclusions on which stimulation patterns should be optimized for tinnitus relief, a deeper understanding of the mechanisms involved in tinnitus suppression is needed.
PubMed: 34827395
DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11111394 -
Otology & Neurotology : Official... Jul 2024Iatrogenic facial nerve palsy following otological surgery is a devastating complication that results in adverse aesthetic and functional outcomes. This study aims to...
OBJECTIVES
Iatrogenic facial nerve palsy following otological surgery is a devastating complication that results in adverse aesthetic and functional outcomes. This study aims to review studies that have reported cases of immediate facial nerve palsy to learn why and where injuries occurred and to assess outcomes following management.
DATABASES REVIEWED
MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Pubmed up to June 20, 2023.
METHODS
Clinical studies of immediate facial nerve palsies following middle ear and cochlear implantation surgery were included. Risk of bias was examined using the Brazzelli risk of bias tool. Due to the inconsistency in reporting of outcomes, we were unable to perform a meta-analysis.
RESULTS
Of 234 studies identified, 11 met the inclusion criteria. The most common causes of injury were excessive drilling, use of sharp hooks to remove disease, or disorientation of the surgeon secondary to bleeding or inflammation. Variable usage of preoperative computed tomography (CT) imaging and intraoperative facial nerve monitoring was reported. The tympanic segment was the most common site of injury. A variety of surgical techniques were employed to approach the facial nerve injury including facial nerve decompression, direct closure, and repair using an autologous nerve graft.
CONCLUSIONS
Otological surgeons should consider utilizing preoperative CT imaging to establish a three-dimensional mental image of key landmarks and anatomical variations before embarking on surgery. Intraoperative FN monitoring enables safe practice. Despite these measures, complex disease processes and hostile intraoperative conditions can present difficulty. Multiple treatment options are available to treat the underlying injury.
Topics: Humans; Facial Paralysis; Otologic Surgical Procedures; Facial Nerve Injuries; Postoperative Complications; Iatrogenic Disease
PubMed: 38865718
DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000004219 -
International Journal of Pediatric... Dec 2015We discuss issues related to cochlear implantation in children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD). We describe the varied nature of this disease category... (Review)
Review
We discuss issues related to cochlear implantation in children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD). We describe the varied nature of this disease category including the numerous potential causes of auditory neuropathy. The most prevalent etiology for infants with ANSD is associated with prolonged neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) stay. We discuss the potential contribution of cochlear hypoxia to this etiology. The second part of this review describes in detail our own experience at the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto, with cochlear implantation of children diagnosed with ANSD. We outline the detection, diagnosis, and referral routes for our patients. We provide an overview of our "standard operation procedures" regarding candidacy, and discuss some of the special considerations that need to be applied to children with ANSD. This includes decisions to implant children with better audiometric thresholds that are standard in non-ANSD patients, concerns about the possibility of spontaneous remission and the appropriate timing of implantation. Finally we review an extensive published literature in outcomes after cochlear implantation (CI) in ANSD. This is not a systematic review but rather an exercise to distill out some important reoccurring themes and the general consensus of opinion to date. Our conclusion is that the hearing loss category ANSD, together with its numerous co-morbidities, is far too heterogeneous to make definitive statements about prognosis with CI.
Topics: Audiometry; Child; Cochlear Implantation; Cochlear Implants; Female; Hearing Loss, Central; Hearing Loss, Sensorineural; Humans; Infant; Male
PubMed: 26545793
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2015.10.006 -
Otolaryngology--head and Neck Surgery :... May 2017Objective (1) To analyze reported speech perception outcomes in patients with inner ear malformations who undergo cochlear implantation, (2) to review the surgical... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Objective (1) To analyze reported speech perception outcomes in patients with inner ear malformations who undergo cochlear implantation, (2) to review the surgical complications and findings, and (3) to compare the 2 classification systems of Jackler and Sennaroglu. Data Sources PubMed, Scopus (including Embase), Medline, and CINAHL Plus. Review Methods Fifty-nine articles were included that contained speech perception and/or intraoperative data. Cases were differentiated depending on whether the Jackler or Sennaroglu malformation classification was used. A meta-analysis of proportions examined incidences of complete insertion, gusher, and facial nerve aberrancy. For speech perception data, weighted means and standard deviations were calculated for all malformations for short-, medium-, and long-term follow-up. Speech tests were grouped into 3 categories-closed-set words, open-set words, and open-set sentences-and then compared through a comparison-of-means t test. Results Complete insertion was seen in 81.8% of all inner ear malformations (95% CI: 72.6-89.5); gusher was reported in 39.1% of cases (95% CI: 30.3-48.2); and facial nerve anomalies were encountered in 34.4% (95% CI: 20.1-50.3). Significant improvements in average performance were seen for closed- and open-set tests across all malformation types at 12 months postoperatively. Conclusions Cochlear implantation outcomes are favorable for those with inner ear malformations from a surgical and speech outcome standpoint. Accurate classification of anatomic malformations, as well as standardization of postimplantation speech outcomes, is necessary to improve understanding of the impact of implantation in this difficult patient population.
Topics: Child, Preschool; Cochlea; Cochlear Implantation; Cochlear Implants; Congenital Abnormalities; Ear, Inner; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Infant; Intraoperative Complications; Male; Risk Assessment; Speech Perception; Speech Production Measurement; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 28374626
DOI: 10.1177/0194599817696502 -
Cochlear Implants International Sep 2019CHARGE syndrome presents with a collection of congenital anomalies affecting multiple organs. Ear and temporal bone anomalies, including hearing loss are highly...
CHARGE syndrome presents with a collection of congenital anomalies affecting multiple organs. Ear and temporal bone anomalies, including hearing loss are highly prevalent. We present an aid to management of this challenging condition and report the strategies and outcomes of cochlear implantation. Systematic review of Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, CENTRAL and clinicaltrials.gov was performed up to 21/10/2018 The review and meta-analysis of studies were performed according to the PRISMA statement. Patient demographics, comorbidity, anatomical factors, details of cochlear implantation and audiological outcome were extracted and summarized. Anatomical and surgical factors were evaluated by meta-analysis. Audiological outcomes reported were too heterogeneous for meta-analysis. All statistics were calculated with SPSS v23.0 (IBM, New York, USA). Thirty-one studies reported 165 cochlear implants in 156 patients with CHARGE syndrome. Temporal bone and facial nerve anomalies were common. The assessment and management of patients with CHARGE syndrome undergoing cochlear implantation is challenging. Outcomes may be affected by cochlear nerve deficiency, inner ear anomalies, and developmental delay. Surgery is almost invariably complicated by abnormal anatomy, and increased incidence of complications. A careful, case-by-case assessment of an individual's requirements within a multi-disciplinary setup is essential for achieving the best possible outcome.
Topics: CHARGE Syndrome; Child; Child, Preschool; Cochlear Implantation; Cochlear Nerve; Contraindications, Procedure; Ear, Inner; Facial Nerve; Female; Humans; Infant; Male; Temporal Bone; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 31282293
DOI: 10.1080/14670100.2019.1634857