-
The Lancet. Infectious Diseases Jan 2021To eliminate mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) of hepatitis B virus (HBV), peripartum antiviral prophylaxis might be required for pregnant women infected with HBV who... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
To eliminate mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) of hepatitis B virus (HBV), peripartum antiviral prophylaxis might be required for pregnant women infected with HBV who have a high risk of MTCT despite infant immunoprophylaxis. We aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of peripartum antiviral prophylaxis to inform the 2020 WHO guidelines.
METHODS
In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, CENTRAL, CNKI, and Wanfang for randomised controlled trials and non-randomised studies of peripartum antiviral prophylaxis versus placebo or no prophylaxis, with no language restriction, published from database inception until March 28, 2019. We used search terms covering HBV, antiviral therapy, and pregnancy. We included studies that enrolled pregnant women with chronic infection with HBV who received antiviral prophylaxis anytime during pregnancy; that included any of the following antivirals: adefovir, emtricitabine, entecavir, lamivudine, telbivudine, tenofovir alafenamide fumarate, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate; and that reported the following outcomes: MTCT, indicated by infant HBsAg positivity or HBV DNA positivity, or both, at age 6-12 months, and any infant or maternal adverse events. Two reviewers independently extracted data. Our primary endpoint was MTCT based on infant HBsAg positivity. We assessed pooled odds ratios (ORs) of the efficacy of peripartum antiviral prophylaxis to reduce the risk of MTCT. We assessed safety of prophylaxis by pooling risk differences. The protocol for the systematic review was pre-registered in PROSPERO, CRD42019134614.
FINDINGS
Of 7463 articles identified, 595 articles were eligible for full-text review and 129 studies (in 157 articles) were included. The following antivirals were assessed in the meta-analysis: tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 300 mg (19 studies, with 1092 mothers and 1072 infants), lamivudine 100-150 mg (40 studies, with 2080 mothers and 2007 infants), and telbivudine 600 mg (83 studies, with 6036 mothers and 5971 infants). The pooled ORs for randomised controlled trials were similar, at 0·10 (95% CI 0·03-0·35) for tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, 0·16 (0·10-0·26) for lamivudine, and 0·14 (0·09-0·21) for telbivudine. The pooled ORs in non-randomised studies were 0·17 (0·10-0·29) for tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, 0·17 (0·12-0·24) for lamivudine, and 0·09 (0·06-0·12) for telbivudine. We found no increased risk of any infant or maternal safety outcomes after peripartum antiviral prophylaxis.
INTERPRETATION
Peripartum antiviral prophylaxis is highly effective at reducing the risk of HBV MTCT. Our findings support the 2020 WHO recommendation of administering antivirals during pregnancy, specifically tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, for the prevention of HBV MTCT.
FUNDING
World Health Organization.
Topics: Adult; Antiviral Agents; Female; Hepatitis B virus; Hepatitis B, Chronic; Humans; Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious; Prenatal Care; Tenofovir
PubMed: 32805200
DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30586-7 -
Journal of Viral Hepatitis Mar 2016Conventional interferon alfa and nucleos(t)ide analogues, such as lamivudine, are frequently used for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) treatment, but are associated with... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Conventional interferon alfa and nucleos(t)ide analogues, such as lamivudine, are frequently used for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) treatment, but are associated with adverse effects and viral resistance. Here we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating all studies of pegylated interferon alfa (PEG-IFNα) treatment in hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive and HBeAg-negative patients with CHB. We searched electronic databases--PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and LILACS--for randomized controlled trials evaluating PEG-IFNα therapy between 1999 and September 2014. Virological response was the primary outcome. We identified 14 studies involving 2829 patients. Our analysis revealed that PEG-IFNα + lamivudine combination therapy produced better virological and biochemical responses than PEG-IFNα monotherapy in HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative patients at the end of treatment. PEG-IFNα + adefovir dipivoxil achieved better seroconversion rate than PEG-IFNα in HBeAg-positive patients at the end of treatment. The present findings demonstrated a beneficial response rate following PEG-IFNα combination therapy with nucelos(t)ides among HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative patients with CHB. Further trials are needed to investigate simultaneous and sequential therapy strategies.
Topics: Adenine; Antiviral Agents; Drug Therapy, Combination; Hepatitis B e Antigens; Hepatitis B, Chronic; Humans; Interferon-alpha; Lamivudine; Organophosphonates; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load
PubMed: 25967226
DOI: 10.1111/jvh.12418 -
Annals of Translational Medicine Sep 2022Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) affects a vast population globally. A variety of drugs are available for the treatment of CHB, including tenofovir (TDF) and adefovir (ADV)....
Comparing the efficacy and safety of tenofovir and adefovir or combined drug treatment for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) affects a vast population globally. A variety of drugs are available for the treatment of CHB, including tenofovir (TDF) and adefovir (ADV). However, the efficacy of monotherapy drug treatment is inconclusive, the safety and efficacy of TDF remain unclear, more data are needed to be included and combined drug treatment is considered to exhibit higher efficacy. To explore this issue, we performed a current literature review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of ADV TDF, TDF ADV + lamivudine (LAM); TDF ADV + entecavir (ETV).
METHODS
We systematically searched China National Knowledge Infrastructure, the Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, Chinese VIP, and Wanfang Data, for relevant clinical trials since July 2015, all included studies were based on PICOS principles and evaluated independently by the reviewers in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook (Rob2.0). A meta-analysis was performed by using Review Manager 5.4.
RESULTS
We included a total of 32 studies, including 31 randomized controlled trials and one retrospective study involving 2,473 patients. The results revealed a low risk of bias in included studies, that the virologic response of TDF was superior to ADV (P<0.05). And TDF was also superior to ADV in Serum creatinine levels, Immunologic function, and safety profile. However, when ADV was combined with other medications, it was superior to TDF in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level and Tbil level and adverse reactions, but on other indicators, TDF was superior to drug combination therapy.
CONCLUSIONS
Results showed that TDF was superior to ADV in the parameters of ALT, hepatitis B virus (HBV)-DNA reduction, HBeAg-negative conversion rate, safety, and total bilirubin levels in patients with CHB. However, when ADV was combined with LAM or ETV, they often showed the same therapeutic effect as TDF in parameters such as ALT level and Tbil level and combined therapy can effectively reduce the occurrence of adverse reactions. In this study, because the sample source countries were limited, a greater number of global studies are needed in the future to verify the current findings.
PubMed: 36267714
DOI: 10.21037/atm-22-3747 -
Infection and Drug Resistance 2022To investigate the efficacy and safety of antiviral drugs in the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
To investigate the efficacy and safety of antiviral drugs in the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
METHODS
All clinical trials of antiviral drug treatment for COVID-19 from December 2019 to December 2021 in CNKI, PubMed, Embase, Wanfang and VIP databases were searched by computer, and the results were systematically reviewed.
RESULTS
A total of 21 studies were included, including 5 randomized controlled studies, 5 non-randomized controlled studies, 3 retrospective cohort studies, 6 retrospective case series studies, and 2 observational studies, with a total of 2118 patients. The evaluated drugs included Ridzevir, Lopinavir/Ritonavir, Jingluwa, Fapiravi, Abidor, Danorivir, and interferon α. The evaluated antiviral drugs did not show superior efficacy for COVID-19 in clinical trials. In terms of safety, particular attention needs to be paid to the gastrointestinal side effects of lopinavir/ritonavir and the serious side effects of redsivir.
CONCLUSION
There is no specific drug. Antiviral drugs have a greater therapeutic benefit for mild and usual patients, and in severe patients, lopinavir/ritonavir may not be effective. For critically ill patients, adefovir or more than two antiviral drugs can be used early. Antiviral drugs combined with traditional Chinese medicine treatment is effective. In view of the safety of the drug, it is necessary to consider the increase of serum uric acid caused by fapravi, the increase of bilirubin caused by abidol, and the gastrointestinal reactions of pitavir. In addition, other adverse reactions should also be noted.
PubMed: 35983302
DOI: 10.2147/IDR.S362946 -
Frontiers in Oncology 2022In this study, we aimed to perform a network meta-analysis to compare the effectiveness of NAs in decreasing the reactivation of HBV, reducing chemotherapy disruption,...
OBJECTIVE
In this study, we aimed to perform a network meta-analysis to compare the effectiveness of NAs in decreasing the reactivation of HBV, reducing chemotherapy disruption, and improving survival in oncology patients.
METHODS
Relevant randomized controlled trials (RCT) evaluating the impact of NAs in HBV infected-related oncology patients were retrieved from electronic databases. The outcome indicators included reactivation rate, survival rate of 1 to 3 years after treatment, and chemotherapy disruption rate. The studies were evaluated for bias using the RCT risk of bias assessment tool recommended in the Cochrane Handbook. The risk ratio (RR) was used to compare the outcome indicators for the anti-viral treatment, and the surface under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRA) was used to identify the optimal therapeutic regime.
RESULTS
A total of 67 trials containing 5722 patients were included in this study. Regarding the reduction of reactivation rate, entecavir, lamivudine, adefovir alone were less effective than the combination of lamivudine and entecavir (94.9%), with RR values ranging from 3.16 to 3.73. However, based on SUCRA, the efficacy of telbivudine (80.3%) and the combination of lamivudine and adefovir dipivoxil (58.8%) were also acceptable. Entecavir (RR values ranging from 1.25 to 1.50) and lamivudine (RR values ranging from 1.27 to 1.35) can prolong the survival rate of patients at 1-3 years, and were better than adefovir dipivoxil in the comparison of 1-year survival rate. The RR values were 1.18 and 1.19, respectively. And entecavir 's ranking in SUCRA was more stable. Entecavir, lamivudine, and tenofovir all reduced chemotherapy interruption rates compared with no antiviral therapy, especially for tenofovir.
CONCLUSIONS
Current evidence shows that lamivudine combined with entecavir, telbivudine, and lamivudine combined with adefovir dipivoxil were the most effective in preventing virus reactivation in HBV infected-related cancer patients treated with chemotherapy. Entecavir had the most stable effect on survival, while tenofovir had the best impact on reducing the chemotherapy disruption rate. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high-quality studies are required to verify the above conclusions.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
PROSPEROI [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/index.php], identifier CRD4202250685.
PubMed: 36727050
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1050714 -
Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases... Dec 2020Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients who had exposed to lamivudine (LAM) and telbivudine (LdT) had high risk of developing entecavir (ETV)-resistance after long-term... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients who had exposed to lamivudine (LAM) and telbivudine (LdT) had high risk of developing entecavir (ETV)-resistance after long-term treatment. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and a network meta-analysis on the efficacy and cost-effectiveness on antiviral regimens in CHB patients with ETV-resistance.
DATA SOURCES
We searched PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science for studies on nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) treatment [including tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF)-based rescue therapies, adefovir (ADV)-based rescue therapies and double-dose ETV therapy] in CHB patients with ETV-resistance. The network meta-analysis was conducted for 1-year complete virological response (CVR) and biological response (BR) rates using GeMTC and ADDIS. A cost-effective analysis was conducted to select an economic and effective treatment regimen based on the 1-year CVR rate.
RESULTS
A total of 6 studies were finally included in this analysis. The antiviral efficacy was estimated. On network meta-analysis, the 1-year CVR rate in ETV-TDF [odds ratio (OR) = 22.30; 95 % confidence interval (CI): 2.78-241.93], LAM-TDF (OR = 70.67; 95 % CI: 5.16-1307.45) and TDF (OR = 16.90; 95 % CI: 2.28-186.30) groups were significantly higher than that in the ETV double-dose group; the 1-year CVR rate in the LAM-TDF group (OR = 14.82; 95 % CI: 1.03-220.31) was significantly higher than that in the LAM/LdT-ADV group. The 1-year BR rate of ETV-TDF (OR = 28.68; 95 % CI: 1.70-1505.08) and TDF (OR = 21.79; 95 % CI: 1.43-1070.09) therapies were significantly higher than that of ETV double-dose therapy. TDF-based therapies had the highest possibility to achieve the CVR and BR at 1 year, in which LAM-TDF combined therapy was the most effective regimen. The ratio of cost/effectiveness for 1-year treatment was 8 526, 17 649, 20 651 Yuan in the TDF group, TDF-ETV group, and ETV-ADV group, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
TDF-based combined therapies such as ETV-TDF and LAM-TDF therapies were the first-line treatment if financial condition is allowed.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Young Adult; Antiviral Agents; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Costs; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Guanine; Hepatitis B virus; Hepatitis B, Chronic; Network Meta-Analysis; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 33051132
DOI: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2020.09.007 -
Advances in Therapy Apr 2016A comprehensive and up-to-date network meta-analysis (NMA) helps to determine the comparative efficacies of nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) in patients with chronic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
A comprehensive and up-to-date network meta-analysis (NMA) helps to determine the comparative efficacies of nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). The aim of this NMA was to assess the efficacy of telbivudine versus adefovir, entecavir, lamivudine, and tenofovir in nucleos(t)ide-naïve hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive patients with CHB.
METHODS
A systematic review was conducted to search Medline, Medline-In Process, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases for publications of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). NMA was performed to compare the efficacy outcomes of telbivudine versus other approved NAs at 1- and 2-year time points.
RESULTS
A total of 75 RCTs were included in the systematic review. At the 1-year time point, telbivudine was associated with significantly higher rates of: (1) HBeAg seroconversion than adefovir [odds ratio (OR) 1.99 (95% credible interval (CrI): 1.05, 3.45)], entecavir [OR 2.00 (95% CrI: 1.44, 2.82)] and lamivudine [OR 1.49 (95% CrI: 1.10, 2.03)]; (2) HBeAg loss than entecavir [OR 1.85 (95% CrI: 1.28, 2.76)] and lamivudine [OR 1.62 (95% CrI: 1.20, 2.24)]; (3) alanine aminotransferase (ALT) normalization than lamivudine [OR 1.50 (95% CrI: 1.05, 2.21)]; and (4) hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA suppression than adefovir [OR 2.77 (95% CrI: 1.28, 5.45)] and lamivudine [OR 2.97 (95% CrI: 1.99, 4.53)]. At the 2-year time point, the relative efficacy outcomes were not statistically significant.
CONCLUSION
At 1 year, telbivudine was superior to adefovir, entecavir and lamivudine in HBeAg seroconversion, and to entecavir and lamivudine in HBeAg loss. Telbivudine was also superior to lamivudine in ALT normalization and to adefovir and lamivudine in suppressing HBV DNA levels.
FUNDING
Novartis Pharma AG.
Topics: Antiviral Agents; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Hepatitis B e Antigens; Hepatitis B, Chronic; Humans; Nucleic Acid Synthesis Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Seroconversion; Telbivudine; Thymidine; Time; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 26921204
DOI: 10.1007/s12325-016-0305-x -
Revista Espanola de Enfermedades... May 2016Seroclearance or seroconversion of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) is generally considered as the clinical endpoint. The purpose of the present meta-analysis was to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
HBsAg seroclearance or seroconversion induced by peg-interferon alpha and lamivudine or adefovir combination therapy in chronic hepatitis B treatment: a meta-analysis and systematic review.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
Seroclearance or seroconversion of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) is generally considered as the clinical endpoint. The purpose of the present meta-analysis was to evaluate pegylated interferon alpha (PEG-IFNα) with or without lamivudine (LAM) or adefovir (ADV) combination treatment in HBsAg seroclearance or seroconversion with CHB.
METHODS
Randomized controlled trials of adults with CHB prior to May 30th 2015, with 48-52 weeks of PEG-IFNα and LAM or ADV combination therapy or monotherapy, were included. Review Manager Software 5.2.0 was used for meta-analysis.
RESULTS
No statistical difference was noticed in HBsAg seroclearance (9.9% vs 7.1%, OR = 1.47, 95% CI 0.75, 2.90; p = 0.26) or observed in HBsAg seroconversion (4.2% vs 3.7%, OR = 1.17, 95% CI 0.57, 2.37; p = 0.67) between PEG-IFNα + LAM and PEG-IFNα + placebo for 24-26 weeks follow-up after treatment on hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive CHB. Statistical difference was not showed in HBsAg disappearance (10.5% vs 6.4%, OR = 1.68, 95% CI 0.75, 3.76; p = 0.21) but was demonstrated in HBsAg seroconversion (6.3% vs 0%, OR = 7.22, 95% CI 1.23, 42.40; p = 0.03) between PEG-IFNα + ADV and PEG-IFNα for 48-52 weeks treatment on HBeAg-positive CHB By systematical evaluation, there were no differences in HBsAg disappearance and seroconversion between PEG-IFNα + placebo and PEG-IFNα + LAM for 48-52 weeks treatment on HBeAg-positive CHB. There were no differences in HBsAg disappearance and seroconversion between PEG-IFNα + placebo and PEG-IFNα + LAM during 24 weeks to 3 years follow-up after treatment on HBeAg-negative CHB by systematical evaluation.
CONCLUSION
The combination between PEG-IFNα and LAM or ADV was not superior to monotherapy of PEG-IFNα in terms of HBsAg seroclearance or seroconversion.
Topics: Adenine; Antiviral Agents; Drug Therapy, Combination; Hepatitis B Surface Antigens; Hepatitis B, Chronic; Humans; Interferon-alpha; Lamivudine; Organophosphonates; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Seroconversion
PubMed: 27023755
DOI: 10.17235/reed.2016.3995/2015 -
Hepatology International Feb 2023It is a challenging issue regarding the optimal antiviral treatment of children with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). The efficacy comparison of interferon (IFN) or... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
It is a challenging issue regarding the optimal antiviral treatment of children with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). The efficacy comparison of interferon (IFN) or nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) monotherapy with their combination could better understand this issue.
METHODS
PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Wanfang, CNKI, and abstracts of major international hepatology meetings were searched from inception to Feb 8, 2022. Randomized control trials and observational studies reporting the efficacy of combination therapy with IFN and NAs in children with CHB were eligible.
RESULTS
A total of 17 studies were included. Compared with IFN monotherapy, combination therapy with IFN and NAs was significantly associated with increased rates of HBV DNA undetectable, HBeAg clearance, HBeAg seroconversion, alanine transaminase (ALT) normalization as well as the composite treatment response both at the end of treatment and during the follow-up period (RRs ranged from 1.23 to 1.75). A favorable trend for HBsAg seroconversion was found in IFN plus NAs-treated children, but not for the HBsAg clearance at the end of treatment. Although a similar trend towards the superiority of the combination therapy versus NAs monotherapy was observed (RRs ranged from 1.24 to 2.33) except for the HBV DNA undetectable rate at the end of treatment, the number of reported studies was limited.
CONCLUSIONS
Combination therapy with IFN and NAs is more effective than IFN monotherapy in viral suppression and serological response for children with CHB. More studies were still needed to reveal the efficacy of this combination therapy compared with NAs monotherapy.
Topics: Humans; Child; Interferons; Nucleosides; Hepatitis B, Chronic; Hepatitis B Surface Antigens; Hepatitis B e Antigens; DNA, Viral; Treatment Outcome; Antiviral Agents; Drug Therapy, Combination
PubMed: 36469299
DOI: 10.1007/s12072-022-10415-7 -
Oncotarget May 2016Currently, no consensus exists regarding the optimal oral prophylactic regimens for hepatitis B surface antigen seropositive patients undergoing chemotherapy. We aimed... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis Review
Systematic review with network meta-analysis: Comparative efficacy of oral nucleos(t)ide analogues for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced hepatitis B virus reactivation.
OBJECTIVES
Currently, no consensus exists regarding the optimal oral prophylactic regimens for hepatitis B surface antigen seropositive patients undergoing chemotherapy. We aimed to compare the efficacy of oral nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs), including lamivudine, entecavir, adefovir, telbivudine and tenofovir, for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation and its related morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic HBV (CHB) infection.
RESULTS
Fifty-two eligible articles consisting of 3892 participants were included. For HBV reactivation, prophylactic treatment with NAs were all significantly superior to no prophylaxis, with odds ratio (OR) from 0.00 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.00~0.04) for the most effective intervention (tenofovir) to 0.10 (95% CI 0.06~0.14) for the least effective intervention (lamivudine). For secondary outcomes, prophylaxis with NAs also significantly outperformed observation. The results suggested that entecavir reduced the risk of HBV related hepatitis (predicted probability, 83%), HBV related death (68%) and all causes of hepatitis (97%) most efficaciously. It ranked second in decreasing all causes of death (34%).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library database were searched for controlled trials up to March 31, 2015. Primary outcome was the incidence of HBV reactivation. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of HBV-related hepatitis and death, all causes of hepatitis and death. Network meta-analysis combined direct and indirect evidence to estimate ORs for the clinical outcomes. A mean ranking and the probability of optimal therapeutic regime was obtained for each treatment based on clinical outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS
Available evidence suggests that prophylatic therapy with tenofovir and entecavir may be the most potent interventions in prevention of HBV reactivation and HBV-related morbidity and mortality for CHB infection patients undergoing chemotherapy.
Topics: Adenine; Antineoplastic Agents; Antiviral Agents; Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic; Guanine; Hepatitis B; Hepatitis B virus; Host-Pathogen Interactions; Humans; Lamivudine; Organophosphonates; Telbivudine; Thymidine; Virus Activation
PubMed: 27121321
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.8907