-
Frontiers in Immunology 2023We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate outcomes following chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy in relapsed/refractory acute myeloid... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate outcomes following chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy in relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (RR-AML).
METHODS
We performed a literature search on PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Clinicaltrials.gov. After screening 677 manuscripts, 13 studies were included. Data was extracted following PRISMA guidelines. Pooled analysis was done using the meta-package by Schwarzer et al. Proportions with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were computed.
RESULTS
We analyzed 57 patients from 10 clinical trials and 3 case reports. The pooled complete and overall response rates were 49.5% (95% CI 0.18-0.81, I=65%) and 65.2% (95% CI 0.36-0.91, I=57%). The pooled incidence of cytokine release syndrome, immune-effector cell associated neurotoxicity syndrome, and graft-versus-host disease was estimated as 54.4% (95% CI 0.17-0.90, I=77%), 3.9% (95% CI 0.00-0.19, I=22%), and 1.6% (95%CI 0.00-0.21, I=33%), respectively.
CONCLUSION
CAR-T therapy has demonstrated modest efficacy in RR-AML. Major challenges include heterogeneous disease biology, lack of a unique targetable antigen, and immune exhaustion.
Topics: Humans; Receptors, Chimeric Antigen; Antigens, CD19; Immunotherapy, Adoptive; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute; Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy
PubMed: 37168849
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1152457 -
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics &... 2023The new class of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell has emboldened health-care professionals and patients for a more effective treatment of hematological malignancies,... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
The new class of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell has emboldened health-care professionals and patients for a more effective treatment of hematological malignancies, indicatively lymphoma, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and myeloma. Nevertheless, their burgeoning procurement costs comprise a litmus stress for health systems across the globe. In this context, this systematic review aims to update the current body of evidence assessing CAR-T economic evaluations and elucidate their financial efficiency.
AREAS COVERED
A systematic review of the economic evaluations of tisagenlecleucel, axicabtagene ciloleucel, idecabtagene vicleucel, lisocabtagene maraleucel, ciltacabtagene autoleucel and brexucabtagene autoleucel was performed.
EXPERT OPINION
The updated results corroborated the previously reported favorable cost-effectiveness ratio of CAR-T. They also pointed out differences among CAR-T agents. However, their budget impact emerges as a significant barrier in the reimbursement process. Any proposed Managed Entry Agreement must integrate the ingrained uncertainty of long-term efficacy and precede reimbursement decisions.
Topics: Humans; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Receptors, Chimeric Antigen; Immunotherapy, Adoptive; Budgets; Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy
PubMed: 37288738
DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2023.2214731 -
Critical Reviews in Oncology/hematology Nov 2022Allogeneic anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has the potential for extensive clinical applications. This study aimed to evaluate its efficacy and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Allogeneic anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has the potential for extensive clinical applications. This study aimed to evaluate its efficacy and safety in treating relapsed or refractory (R/R) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Four databases were searched for relevant studies. Among patients treated with donor-derived CAR T-cell therapy, ALL patients had a complete remission (CR) rate of 80 % and a 1-year overall survival rate of 51 %. The graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) rate was 4 %, cytokine release syndrome was 69 %, and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome was 8 %. For off-the-shelf CAR T-cell therapy, the CR rate for ALL was 70 %, and for NHL, it was 52 %. The objective response rate for NHL was 72 %. The pooled GvHD of off-the-shelf CAR T-cell therapy for ALL and NHL combined was 0 %. Allogeneic anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy are effective and safe for treating R/R ALL and NHL. AVAILABILITY OF DATA AND MATERIALS: All datasets generated in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Material.
Topics: Antigens, CD19; Graft vs Host Disease; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Immunotherapy, Adoptive; Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin; Receptors, Chimeric Antigen
PubMed: 36087853
DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2022.103807 -
Human Gene Therapy Mar 2023Dual-targeting chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy has been proposed as a potential solution for overcoming antigen escape during anti-CD19 CAR-T treatment.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Dual-targeting chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy has been proposed as a potential solution for overcoming antigen escape during anti-CD19 CAR-T treatment. We performed this systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy and safety of this novel treatment in patients with B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL) and B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). We systematically searched relevant literature based on databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane) and conference abstracts. The primary outcomes measured were the best objective response rate (ORR) or complete response (CR), 12-month overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), cytokine release syndrome (CRS), and neurotoxicity. Fifteen registered prospective open-label clinical trials were included. Among the 260 patients with B-NHL, the pooled best ORR and CR were 77% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.71-0.82) and 52% (95% CI: 0.40-0.63), respectively, and the pooled 12-month PFS and OS were 54.0% (95% CI: 0.47-0.61) and 66.0% (95% CI: 0.56-0.77), respectively. In the 159 patients with B-ALL, the combined best CR was observed to be 92% (95% CI: 0.82-0.99) and the pooled 12-month PFS and OS were 65.0% (95% CI: 0.51-0.77) and 73.0% (95% CI: 0.56-0.92), respectively. Moreover, in B-NHL patients, grade ≥3 CRS was observed in 14.0% (95% CI: 0.04-0.29) of these patients, and 5.0% (95% CI: 0.02-0.08) showed grade ≥3 neurotoxicity; in the case of B-ALL patients, grade ≥3 CRS and neurotoxicity occurred in 11.0% (95% CI: 0.04-0.19) and 2.0% (95% CI: 0.00-0.06), respectively. This study demonstrates the safety and clinical efficacy of dual-targeting CAR-T cell therapies in B cell malignancies. Further, well-designed randomized controlled trials are required to establish the role of dual-targeting CAR-T cell therapy in patients with B cell malignancies.
Topics: Humans; Receptors, Chimeric Antigen; Prospective Studies; Immunotherapy, Adoptive; B-Lymphocytes; Lymphoma, B-Cell; Antigens, CD19
PubMed: 36734417
DOI: 10.1089/hum.2022.183 -
International Immunopharmacology Oct 2014A new strategy of adoptive and passive immunotherapy involves combining dendritic cells (DCs) with a subset of natural killer T lymphocytes termed cytokine-induced... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
A new strategy of adoptive and passive immunotherapy involves combining dendritic cells (DCs) with a subset of natural killer T lymphocytes termed cytokine-induced killer (CIK) cells. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of DC-CIK therapy vs. placebo, no intervention, conventional treatments, or other complementary and alternative medicines for malignant tumors.
METHOD
We searched PubMed, Medline, Embase, Cochrane, Wangfang, Weipu, CNKI databases and reference lists of articles. We selected randomized controlled trials of DC-CIK therapy vs. placebo, no intervention, conventional treatments, or other complementary and alternative medicines in patients with all types and stages of malignant tumor. Primary outcome measures were overall survival and treatment response. Secondary outcome measures were health-related quality of life (HRQoL) assessment, progression free survival (PFS), and adverse events.
RESULTS
Six trials met our inclusion criteria. There was evidence that chemotherapy+DC-CIK increased the 2-year (RR 2.88, 95% CI 1.38 to 5.99, P=0.005) and 3-year (RR 11.67, 95% CI 2.28 to 59.69, P=0.003) survival rates and progression free survival (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.94, P<0.0001) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer compared to those treated with chemotherapy alone. DC-CIK therapy appears to be well-tolerated by cancer patients and to improve post-treatment patient health related quality of life.
CONCLUSION
DC-CIK immunotherapy is a safe and effective treatment for patients with malignant tumors. Further clinical trials to provide supportive evidence for the routine use of DC-CIK therapy in clinical practice are warranted.
Topics: Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy; Cytokine-Induced Killer Cells; Dendritic Cells; Humans; Immunotherapy; Neoplasms; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 25073120
DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2014.07.019 -
Oncotarget Dec 2017Although adoptive immunotherapy (AIT) is a novel emerging target treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), its actual efficacy remains controversial. In this...
Although adoptive immunotherapy (AIT) is a novel emerging target treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), its actual efficacy remains controversial. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of AIT for NSCLC. We systematically searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Medline, and Web of Science for relevant parallel randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and high-quality observation studies of AIT without any language restrictions. Two investigators reviewed all the texts and extracted information regarding overall survival rate (OS), progression-free survival rate (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR) from eligible studies; sensitivity analyses and subgroup analyses were also conducted to reduce heterogeneity Of 319 suitable studies, 15 studies (13 RCTs and 2 observation studies) involving 1684 patients were finally included. Compared to the Control therapy (CT) group, the AIT group exhibited better 1-year OS ( = 0.001), 2-year OS ( < 0.001), 3-year OS ( < 0.001), 5-year OS ( = 0.032), 1-year PFS ( < 0.001), and 2-year PFS ( = 0.029). The difference in the ORR ( = 0.293) and DCR ( = 0.123) was not significant between the groups. The subgroup analysis showed that DC/CIK did more benefit to NSCLC patients than LAK and the cycles not associated with AIT efficacy. AIT can significantly improve the OS and PFS with acceptable toxicity for NSCLC. Nevertheless, further multicenter studies are needed to confirm our conclusion and determine which adoptive immunotherapy is associated with the greatest efficacy.
PubMed: 29348890
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.19373 -
Journal of Clinical Oncology : Official... Sep 2016Programmed cell death protein-1- checkpoint blockers have recently been approved as second-line treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Unfortunately,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
Programmed cell death protein-1- checkpoint blockers have recently been approved as second-line treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Unfortunately, only a subgroup of patients responds and shows long-term survival to these therapies. Tumor vaccines and cellular immunotherapies could synergize with checkpoint blockade, but which of these treatments is most efficacious is unknown. In this meta-analysis, we assessed the efficacy of tumor vaccination and cellular immunotherapy in NSCLC.
METHODS
We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating cellular immunotherapy or vaccines in NSCLC. We used random effects models to analyze overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), expressed as hazard ratios (HRs), and differences in time (months). The effect of immunotherapy type, disease stage, tumor histology, and concurrent chemotherapy was assessed using subgroup analysis and meta-regression. All procedures were performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.
RESULTS
We identified 18 RCTs that matched our selection criteria; these included a total of 6,756 patients. Immunotherapy extended NSCLC survival and PFS, expressed as HR (OS: HR, 0.81, 95% CI, 0.70 to 0.94, P = .01; PFS: HR, 0.83, 95% CI, 0.72 to 0.95, P = .006) and month difference (OS: difference, 5.43 months, 95% CI, 3.20 to 7.65, P < .005; PFS: difference, 3.24 months, 95% CI, 1.61 to 4.88, P < .005). Cellular therapies outperformed tumor vaccines (OS as HR: P = .005, month difference: P < .001; PFS as HR: P = .001, month difference: P = .004). There was a benefit of immunotherapy in low-stage compared with high-stage NSCLC and with concurrent administration of chemotherapy only in one of four outcome measures evaluated (PFS in months: P = .01 and PFS as HR: P = .031, respectively). There was no significant effect of tumor histology on survival or PFS.
CONCLUSION
Tumor vaccines and cellular immunotherapies enhanced OS and PFS in NSCLC. Cellular immunotherapy was found to be more effective than tumor vaccination. These findings have implications for future studies investigating combination immunotherapy in NSCLC.
Topics: Cancer Vaccines; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Disease-Free Survival; Humans; Immunotherapy, Adoptive; Lung Neoplasms; Neoplasm Staging; Risk Factors; Survival Analysis; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 27432922
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2015.66.3955 -
Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy Nov 2022Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has emerged as a promising treatment option for relapsed or refractory B-cell malignancies and multiple myeloma.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has emerged as a promising treatment option for relapsed or refractory B-cell malignancies and multiple myeloma. Underlying and treatment-related variables may contribute to the development of infectious complications.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the incidence of overall and severe (grade ≥3) infection in patients with hematological malignancies receiving CAR T-cells. Secondary outcomes included the specific rates of bacterial, viral and invasive fungal infection (IFI), and infection-related mortality. PubMed, Embase and Web of Science databases were searched from inception to 27 May 2022. Sensitivity analysis were performed according to the type of malignancy and study design (randomized clinical trials [RCTs] or observational studies).
RESULTS
Forty-five studies (34 RCTs) comprising 3,591 patients were included. The pooled incidence rates of overall and severe infection were 33.8% (I = 96.31%) and 16.2% (I = 74.41%). The respiratory tract was the most common site of infection. Most events were bacterial or viral, whereas the occurrence of IFI was rare. The pooled attributable mortality was 1.8% (I = 43.44%).
CONCLUSIONS
Infection is a frequent adverse event in patients receiving CAR T-cell therapy. Further research should address specific risk factors in this population.
Topics: Humans; Immunotherapy, Adoptive; Receptors, Chimeric Antigen; Antigens, CD19; Hematologic Neoplasms; Neoplasms
PubMed: 36148506
DOI: 10.1080/14787210.2022.2128762 -
Experimental Hematology & Oncology Aug 2023Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy is one of the most promising advances in cancer treatment. It is based on genetically modified T cells to express a CAR,... (Review)
Review
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy is one of the most promising advances in cancer treatment. It is based on genetically modified T cells to express a CAR, which enables the recognition of the specific tumour antigen of interest. To date, CAR-T cell therapies approved for commercialisation are designed to treat haematological malignancies, showing impressive clinical efficacy in patients with relapsed or refractory advanced-stage tumours. However, since they all use the patient´s own T cells as starting material (i.e. autologous use), they have important limitations, including manufacturing delays, high production costs, difficulties in standardising the preparation process, and production failures due to patient T cell dysfunction. Therefore, many efforts are currently being devoted to contribute to the development of safe and effective therapies for allogeneic use, which should be designed to overcome the most important risks they entail: immune rejection and graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). This systematic review brings together the wide range of different approaches that have been studied to achieve the production of allogeneic CAR-T cell therapies and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of every strategy. The methods were classified in two major categories: those involving extra genetic modifications, in addition to CAR integration, and those relying on the selection of alternative cell sources/subpopulations for allogeneic CAR-T cell production (i.e. γδ T cells, induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), umbilical cord blood T cells, memory T cells subpopulations, virus-specific T cells and cytokine-induced killer cells). We have observed that, although genetic modification of T cells is the most widely used approach, new approaches combining both methods have emerged. However, more preclinical and clinical research is needed to determine the most appropriate strategy to bring this promising antitumour therapy to the clinical setting.
PubMed: 37605218
DOI: 10.1186/s40164-023-00435-w -
Frontiers in Immunology 2024Immunotherapy treatments aim to modulate the host's immune response to either mitigate it in inflammatory/autoimmune disease or enhance it against infection or cancer....
Immunotherapy treatments aim to modulate the host's immune response to either mitigate it in inflammatory/autoimmune disease or enhance it against infection or cancer. Among different immunotherapies reaching clinical application during the last years, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) immunotherapy has emerged as an effective treatment for cancer where different CAR T cells have already been approved. Yet their use against infectious diseases is an area still relatively poorly explored, albeit with tremendous potential for research and clinical application. Infectious diseases represent a global health challenge, with the escalating threat of antimicrobial resistance underscoring the need for alternative therapeutic approaches. This review aims to systematically evaluate the current applications of CAR immunotherapy in infectious diseases and discuss its potential for future applications. Notably, CAR cell therapies, initially developed for cancer treatment, are gaining recognition as potential remedies for infectious diseases. The review sheds light on significant progress in CAR T cell therapy directed at viral and opportunistic fungal infections.
Topics: Humans; Receptors, Chimeric Antigen; Immunotherapy; Immunotherapy, Adoptive; Neoplasms; Communicable Diseases
PubMed: 38352878
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1289303