-
Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease 2022In pandemic conditions, patients with febrile neutropenia are also at risk of COVID-19. Aim of this systematic review is to evaluate COVID-19 cases presented with... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
In pandemic conditions, patients with febrile neutropenia are also at risk of COVID-19. Aim of this systematic review is to evaluate COVID-19 cases presented with febrile neutropenia and provide information regarding incidence, clinical course and prognosis.
METHODS
We systematically searched on COVID-19 and febrile neutropenia cases in PubMed, SCOPUS and Web of Science.
RESULTS
A total of 19 febrile neutropenic patients were analyzed. A male predominance was noted. Eleven cases had hematological malignancies. Fourteen of the cases were previously received chemotherapy. Five patients had severe neutropenia: 3 had hematologic cancer and none died. 17 (89.5%) cases have pulmonary involvement and seven of them had severe disease with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Three cases with ARDS were died. 12 of them received G-CSF for treatment. Five cases were developed respiratory failure after G-CSF use. Overall mortality was 15.8%, while death was not observed in patients without malignancy and solid organ tumors, the mortality rate was 27% in cases with hematological malignancies.
CONCLUSION
In ongoing pandemic, febrile neutropenic patients should be precisely evaluated for COVID-19 disease. It should be remembered that there may not be typical signs and symptoms and laboratory findings of COVID-19 disease because of the immunosuppression.
Topics: COVID-19; Febrile Neutropenia; Female; Fever; Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor; Hematologic Neoplasms; Humans; Male; Neoplasms; Respiratory Distress Syndrome
PubMed: 35272019
DOI: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2022.102305 -
Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders Dec 2022Neutropenia is an infrequent complication of treatment with CD20 depleting agents and may require the administration of granulocyte-colony stimulating factors (G-CSF),...
BACKGROUND
Neutropenia is an infrequent complication of treatment with CD20 depleting agents and may require the administration of granulocyte-colony stimulating factors (G-CSF), which have been associated with an increased relapse risk in patients with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). The management of this side effect is still matter of debate.
METHODS
Aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical features and the management of neutropenia occurring in anti-CD20 treated PwMS through a single-center case series and a systematic review of the literature, performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.
RESULTS
A total of 19 patients were included (3 from our clinical experience, 16 from the systematic review). Median age was 38 years-old (25-69) and nearly 70% were female, most of these patients had already received a median of 3 (0-4) previous treatments. Neutropenia occurred in 11 patients treated with ocrelizumab and 8 with rituximab, after a median of 2 (1-7) infusions and 9.5 (1-42) months from the first infusion. Most of these patients had late-onset neutropenia, that occurred after a median time of 90 days (2-156). About 70% of patients were symptomatic and most were treated with G-CSF or antibiotics. No relapses after G-CSF were reported. In those who did not suspend anti-CD20 (68.8%), neutropenia reoccurred in 18.2% of cases. Finally, switching between rituximab and ocrelizumab seem not to affect the occurrence of neutropenia.
CONCLUSION
Our data provides practical evidence regarding the occurrence and the management of neutropenia during treatment with anti-CD20 in PwMS.
Topics: Adult; Female; Humans; Male; Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor; Multiple Sclerosis; Neutropenia; Retrospective Studies; Rituximab
PubMed: 35994977
DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2022.104090 -
Anti-cancer Drugs Nov 2014Raltitrexed is a thymidylate synthase inhibitor belonging to the antimetabolite class of cytotoxic drugs. It is also effective in colorectal cancer (CRC) both as a... (Review)
Review
Raltitrexed is a thymidylate synthase inhibitor belonging to the antimetabolite class of cytotoxic drugs. It is also effective in colorectal cancer (CRC) both as a single agent and in combination with other drugs, in particular in those patients with cardiologic risk factors or previous cardiotoxicity. The efficacy of first-line raltitrexed-based chemotherapy containing oxaliplatin (TOMOX) and irinotecan (TOMIRI) was investigated in this systematic review. Studies that enrolled advanced CRC patients for first-line therapy with TOMOX/TOMIRI combinations were identified using electronic databases (Pubmed, SCOPUS, Web of Science, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library). A systematic analysis was carried out using Comprehensive Meta Analysis (version 2.2.064) software to calculate the pooled response rate and 95% confidence limits. The median pooled overall survival and progression-free survival were also calculated. Results for TOMOX and TOMIRI studies were compared using the two-sided Student's t-test. We tested for significant heterogeneity using Cochran's χ-test and I index. Twelve studies published between 2001 and 2012 were eligible for this analysis and a total of 735 patients were enrolled in these studies. The overall response rate was 40% (95% confidence interval 34-46%): 43.9% for TOMOX and 34.1% for TOMIRI arms. The weighted median overall survival and progression-free survival times were 14.6 and 6.7 months, respectively. Neutropenia and liver toxicity were more frequent with TOMOX, whereas neutropenia and diarrhea were more frequent with TOMIRI. However, compared with historical FOLFOX and FOLFIRI trials, raltitrexed-based doublets are associated with less neutropenia and gastrointestinal toxicity and uncommon cardiotoxicity. TOMOX and TOMIRI doublets are active as first-line chemotherapy for advanced CRC and seem useful in particular when the use of 5-fluorouracil is contraindicated for cardiac comorbidity.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Camptothecin; Cardiotoxicity; Colorectal Neoplasms; Diarrhea; Humans; Irinotecan; Liver; Neoplasm Metastasis; Neutropenia; Organoplatinum Compounds; Oxaliplatin; Quinazolines; Thiophenes
PubMed: 24869761
DOI: 10.1097/CAD.0000000000000133 -
Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism Oct 2015To systematically review the available evidence to evaluate (1) the prevalence and degree of leukopenia, lymphopenia, and neutropenia in patients with systemic lupus... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
To systematically review the available evidence to evaluate (1) the prevalence and degree of leukopenia, lymphopenia, and neutropenia in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), (2) whether these conditions carry a major infection risk for patients, and (3) whether a treatment with colony stimulating factors (CSF) can be an effective and safe option in SLE patients with leukopenia.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
MedLine and Embase were searched by including MeSH terms, text words, and subheadings "systemic lupus erythematosus," "leukopenia" (first search), and "colony stimulating factor" (second search). Inclusion and exclusion criteria were a priori defined and two reviewers screened the retrieved articles for selection criteria; data from the included studies were recorded in ad hoc standard forms; the results were synthesized and transported to evidence tables.
RESULTS
A total of 17 articles were included in the systematic literature review: nine articles were retrieved for the first research question and 11 for the second while no articles satisfied the inclusion criteria for the third research question. The prevalence of leukopenia is reported in 22-41.8% of cases and lymphopenia is reported cumulatively from 15% to 82% of the patients while neutropenia is described in 20-40% of the patients. There is no evidence of a significant association between overall reduction of white blood cells and infection occurrence while some studies found a strong association between low lymphocytes/neutrophils count and the risk of major infections. Only case reports and case series have been found to investigate the safety of CSF in SLE patients.
CONCLUSIONS
The results of this systematic literature review are inconclusive for many aspects related to the original research questions and highlight the need for further studies. Indeed, the strength of the evidence is not sufficiently robust to draw specific recommendations on how to balance between the need to treat the patient with SLE with immunosuppressive drugs and the risk of severe infections.
Topics: Comorbidity; Humans; Leukopenia; Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic; Lymphopenia; Neutropenia; Prevalence
PubMed: 26170228
DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2015.05.009 -
Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology Aug 2017Clozapine is associated with hematological abnormalities, notably neutropenia, which may progress to agranulocytosis. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE/BACKGROUND
Clozapine is associated with hematological abnormalities, notably neutropenia, which may progress to agranulocytosis. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) have been used to reduce the frequency and duration of clozapine-associated neutropenia. This review aims to explore the use, efficacy, and tolerability of these cytokines in the treatment of clozapine-associated agranulocytosis.
METHODS/PROCEDURES
We conducted a systematic review of published interventional and observational studies, case series, and case reports where G-CSF/GM-CSF was used to treat clozapine-associated agranulocytosis.
FINDINGS/RESULTS
We identified 29 reports (40 patients). The median duration of neutrophil recovery time after stopping clozapine and starting cytokine treatment was 7 days (range, 2-13 days) for those with agranulocytosis (absolute neutrophil count < 0.5 × 10 cells/L). Ninety-four percent (n = 29) had no serious adverse reactions, and no deaths occurred.
IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS
Our findings indicate that G-CSF/GM-CSF use is well tolerated and suggest that G-CSF can sometimes be safely used to reduce the duration of neutropenia associated with clozapine use. However, the interpretation of this outcome is difficult, given the likely publication bias for positive outcomes in case reports.
Topics: Agranulocytosis; Antipsychotic Agents; Clozapine; Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor; Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor; Humans; Observational Studies as Topic
PubMed: 28437295
DOI: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000000715 -
Medicine Oct 2015Epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are a critical member of systemic therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are a critical member of systemic therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Erlotinib is the first-generation EGFR-TKIs, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend it as a first-line agent in patients with sensitizing EGFR mutations. However, the safety of erlotinib plus chemotherapy (CT) or erlotinib alone for advanced NSCLC remains controversial. We carried out a systematic meta-analysis to determine the overall risk of neutropenia and leukopenia associated with erlotinib. PubMed, EMBASE, CBM, CNKI, WanFang database, The Cochrane library, Web of Science, as well as abstracts presented at ASCO conferences and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched to identify relevant studies. RR with 95% CIs for neutropenia and leukopenia were all extracted. The random-effects model was used to calculate pooled RRs and 95% CIs. Power calculation was performed using macro embedded in SAS software after all syntheses were conducted. We identified 12 eligible studies involving 3932 patients. Erlotinib plus CT or alone relative to CT is associated with significantly decreased risks of neutropenia and leukopenia in patients with advanced NSCLC (RR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.21-0.71; P = 0.00; incidence: 9.9 vs. 35.2%) and (RR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.11-0.93; P = 0.04; incidence: 3.5 vs. 11.6%), respectively. The subgroup analysis by erlotinib with or without CT showed that erlotinib combine with CT have no significance decrease the relative risks of neutropenia or leukopenia (RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.78-1.23; P = 0.87; incidence: 26.2 vs. 30.5%) and (RR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.34-1.95; P = 0.64; incidence: 6.5 vs. 9.3%), respectively. However, erlotinib alone could decrease incidence of neutropenia (RR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.07-0.27; P = 0.00; incidence: 3.7 vs. 40.8%) or leukopenia (RR, 0.07; 95% CI, 0.01-0.45; P = 0.01; incidence: 0.8 vs. 15.7%). The power analysis suggests that a power of 61.31% was determined to detect an RR of 0.38 for neutropenia, and 78.03% for an RR of 0.32 for leukopenia. The present meta-analysis suggested that erlotinib could decrease the incidence of neutropenia and leukopenia in patients with advanced NSCLC undergoing erlotinib regardless of whether combined with CT or not. The subgroup analysis revealed that erlotinib combine with CT did not affect the incidence; however, erlotinib alone could significantly decrease the incidence of neutropenia and leukopenia compared with CT alone.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Erlotinib Hydrochloride; Humans; Leukopenia; Lung Neoplasms; Neutropenia; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Risk Factors
PubMed: 26448029
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001719 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Sep 2014Systemic fungal infection is considered to be an important cause of morbidity and mortality in cancer patients, particularly those with neutropenia. Antifungal drugs are... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Systemic fungal infection is considered to be an important cause of morbidity and mortality in cancer patients, particularly those with neutropenia. Antifungal drugs are often given prophylactically, or empirically to patients with persistent fever.
OBJECTIVES
To assess whether commonly used antifungal drugs decrease mortality in cancer patients with neutropenia.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched PubMed from 1966 to 7 July 2014 and the reference lists of identified articles.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised clinical trials of amphotericin B, fluconazole, ketoconazole, miconazole, itraconazole or voriconazole compared with placebo or no treatment in cancer patients with neutropenia.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
The two review authors independently assessed trial eligibility and risk of bias, and abstracted data.
MAIN RESULTS
Thirty-two trials involving 4287 patients were included. Prophylactic or empirical treatment with amphotericin B significantly decreased total mortality (relative risk (RR) 0.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.50 to 0.96), whereas the estimated RRs for fluconazole, ketoconazole, miconazole, and itraconazole were close to 1.00. No eligible trials were found with voriconazole. Amphotericin B and fluconazole decreased mortality ascribed to fungal infection (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.76 and RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.73, respectively). The incidence of invasive fungal infection decreased significantly with administration of amphotericin B (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.73), fluconazole (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.57) and itraconazole (RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.97), but not with ketoconazole or miconazole. Effect estimates were similar for those 13 trials that had adequate allocation concealment and were blinded. The reporting of harms was far too variable from trial to trial to allow a meaningful overview. For the 2011 and 2014 updates no additional trials were identified for inclusion.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Intravenous amphotericin B was the only antifungal agent that reduced total mortality. It should therefore be preferred when prophylactic or empirical antifungal therapy is introduced in cancer patients with neutropenia.
Topics: Antifungal Agents; Humans; Immunocompromised Host; Mycoses; Neoplasms; Neutropenia; Opportunistic Infections; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 25188768
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000026.pub2 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Nov 2022Radiotherapy and chemotherapy are used to improve survival in colorectal cancer but adverse effects can be a problem. Severe adverse effects may result in dose reduction... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Radiotherapy and chemotherapy are used to improve survival in colorectal cancer but adverse effects can be a problem. Severe adverse effects may result in dose reduction or cessation of treatment, which have an impact on survival. Coriolus versicolor (Trametes versicolor or 'Turkey Tail') mushroom and its extracts have been used by cancer patients to help with adverse effects.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effects of adjunctive Coriolus versicolor (Trametes versicolor) and its extracts on adverse effects and on survival during colorectal cancer treatment (chemotherapy and radiotherapy) compared with no adjunctive treatment.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched databases including CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, AMED and CINAHL, Chinese and Japanese databases, and trials registers to 12th April 2022 without restriction of language or publication status. We screened reference lists and attempted to contact researchers in the field to identify additional studies.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the efficacy and safety of Coriolus versicolor and its extracts in adult participants with a confirmed diagnosis of colorectal cancer, in addition to conventional treatment. Interventions included any preparation of Coriolus versicolor (raw, decoction, capsule, tablet, tincture, extract, injection), any part of the fungus (cap, stem, mycelium or whole), in any dose or regimen. Outcomes included adverse events rates, survival, disease progression and recurrence, response rates and quality of life.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently screened and selected studies, extracted outcome data, and assessed risk of bias. We evaluated the overall certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach.
MAIN RESULTS
We included seven parallel RCTs (1569 participants). Six studies (1516 participants) were conducted in Japan and one study (53 participants) in China. Studies included both male and female participants with colorectal cancer (five studies), colon cancer (one study) or rectal cancer (one study). Participants were diagnosed with cancer ranging from stage II to stage IV. Coriolus was used in the form of an extract in all seven studies and was generally used after curative resection, although in one study it was used preoperatively. Duration of treatment with the extract varied between four weeks and three years. Chemotherapeutic regimens in six studies consisted of an oral fluoropyrimidine which was preceded by weekly intravenous 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) in one study, by mitomycin C in two studies, and which was combined with folinic acid (Leucovorin) in two studies and with radiotherapy preoperatively in one study. XELOX (oxaliplatin intravenous infusion and capecitabine) was used in the remaining study. We found very low-certainty evidence of little to no effect of adjunctive treatment with Coriolus (in the form of an extract, polysaccharide-Krestin, PSK) on withdrawal from treatment due to adverse events (risk ratio (RR) 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45 to 2.34; 703 participants; 3 studies;). We are uncertain whether adjunctive Coriolus versicolor and its extracts compared to usual care alone resulted in a difference in adverse events including neutropenia (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.71; 133 participants; 3 studies; very low certainty), oral cavity disorders such as oral dryness and mucositis (RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.13 to 1.03; 1022 participants; 5 studies; very low certainty), nausea (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.22; 969 participants; 4 studies; very low certainty), diarrhoea (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.32 to 1.86; 1022 participants; 5 studies; very low certainty), and fatigue (RR 0.76; 95% CI 0.33 to 1.78; 133 participants; 3 studies; very low certainty). We found low-certainty evidence of a small effect of adjunctive Coriolus on improved survival at five years compared with no adjunctive care (RR 1.08, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.15; 1094 participants; 3 studies; number needed to benefit (NNTB) = 16 (95% Cl 9 to 70). The effect at earlier time points was unclear.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Due to the very low certainty of evidence, we were uncertain about the effect of adjunctive Coriolus (in the form of an extract PSK) on adverse events resulting from conventional chemotherapy for colorectal cancer. This includes effects on withdrawal of treatment due to adverse events and on specific adverse outcomes such as neutropenia and nausea. The uncertainty in the evidence also means that it was unclear whether any adverse events were due to the chemotherapy or to the extract itself. While there was low-certainty evidence of a small effect on overall survival at five years, the influence of reduced adverse effects on this could not be determined. In addition, chemotherapy regimens used in assessing this outcome do not reflect current preferred practice.
Topics: Adult; Female; Humans; Male; Agaricales; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Nausea; Neutropenia; Trametes; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 36445793
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012053.pub2 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Oct 2014Febrile neutropenia is a frequent adverse event experienced by people with cancer who are undergoing chemotherapy, and is a potentially life-threatening situation. The... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Febrile neutropenia is a frequent adverse event experienced by people with cancer who are undergoing chemotherapy, and is a potentially life-threatening situation. The current treatment is supportive care plus antibiotics. Colony-stimulating factors (CSFs), such as granulocyte-CSF (G-CSF) and granulocyte-macrophage CSF (GM-CSF), are cytokines that stimulate and accelerate the production of one or more cell lines in the bone marrow. Clinical trials have addressed the question of whether the addition of a CSF to antibiotics could improve outcomes in individuals diagnosed with febrile neutropenia. However, the results of these trials are conflicting.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of adding G-CSF or GM-CSF to standard treatment (antibiotics) when treating chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in individuals diagnosed with cancer.
SEARCH METHODS
We conducted the search in March 2014 and covered the major electronic databases: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, and SCI. We contacted experts in hematology and oncology and also scanned the citations from the relevant articles.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared CSF plus antibiotics versus antibiotics alone for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in adults and children.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We used the standard methodological procedures expected by The Cochrane Collaboration. We performed meta-analysis of the selected studies using Review Manager 5 software.
MAIN RESULTS
Fourteen RCTs (15 comparisons) including a total of 1553 participants addressing the role of CSF plus antibiotics in febrile neutropenia were included. Overall mortality was not improved by the use of CSF plus antibiotics versus antibiotics alone (hazard ratio (HR) 0.74 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.47 to 1.16) P = 0.19; 13 RCTs; 1335 participants; low quality evidence). A similar finding was seen for infection-related mortality (HR 0.75 (95% CI 0.47 to 1.20) P = 0.23; 10 RCTs; 897 participants; low quality evidence). Individuals who received CSF plus antibiotics were less likely to be hospitalized for more than 10 days (risk ratio (RR) 0.65 (95% CI 0.44 to 0.95) P = 0.03; 8 RCTs; 1221 participants; low quality evidence) and had more number of participants with a more faster neutrophil recovery (RR 0.52 (95% CI 0.34 to 0.81) P = 0.004; 5 RCTs; 794 participants; moderate quality evidence) than those treated with antibiotics alone. Similarly, participants receiving CSF plus antibiotics had shorter duration of neutropenia (standardized mean difference (SMD) -1.70 (95% CI -2.65 to -0.76) P = 0.0004; 9 RCTs; 1135 participants; moderate quality evidence), faster recovery from fever (SMD -0.49 (95% CI -0.90 to -0.09) P value = 0.02; 9 RCTs; 966 participants; moderate quality evidence) and shorter duration of antibiotics use (SMD -1.50 (95% CI -2.83 to -0.18) P = 0.03; 3 RCTs; 457 participants; low quality evidence) compared with participants receiving antibiotics alone. We found no significant difference in the incidence of deep venous thromboembolism (RR 1.68 (95% CI 0.72 to 3.93) P = 0.23; 4 RCTs; 389 participants; low quality evidence) in individuals treated with CSF plus antibiotics compared with those treated with antibiotics alone. We found higher incidence of bone or joint pain or flu-like symptoms (RR 1.59 (95% CI 1.04 to 2.42) P = 0.03; 6 RCTs; 622 participants; low quality evidence) in individuals treated with CSF plus antibiotics compared with those treated with antibiotics alone. Overall, the methodological quality of studies was moderate to low across different outcomes. The main reasons to downgrade the quality of evidence were inconsistency across the included studies and imprecision of results.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
The use of a CSF plus antibiotics in individuals with chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia had no effect on overall mortality, but reduced the amount of time participants spent in hospital and improved their ability to achieve neutrophil recovery. It was not clear whether CSF plus antibiotics had an effect on infection-related mortality. Participants receiving CSFs had shorter duration of neutropenia, faster recovery from fever and shorter duration of antibiotics use.
Topics: Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia; Child; Colony-Stimulating Factors; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fever; Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor; Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor; Humans; Neoplasms; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 25356786
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003039.pub2 -
The Journal of Infection Sep 2016Mucormycosis is an invasive fungal infection afflicting immunocompromised patients, causing a significant degree of morbidity and mortality. The purpose of the study was... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
Mucormycosis is an invasive fungal infection afflicting immunocompromised patients, causing a significant degree of morbidity and mortality. The purpose of the study was to provide a comprehensive analysis describing the epidemiology and outcome of mucormycosis in the scenario of HIV infection.
METHODS
We systematically searched PubMed for reports about mucormycosis associated with HIV. Eligible studies describe the predisposing factor, clinical form, treatment, and survival outcome.
RESULTS
We included 61 articles from 212 reviewed abstracts, corresponding to 67 cases. Patients were mostly men (68.2%) with a median CD4(+) count of 47 [IQR 17-100] cells/mm(3). Intravenous drug use (50%), neutropenia (29.7%) and corticosteroid use (25%) were the predominant associated factors. The main clinical forms were disseminated (20.9%), renal (19.4%), and rhino-cerebral (17.9%). Rhizopus (45.5%) and Lichtheimia spp (30.3%) were the main fungal isolates. Treatment consisted of antifungal therapy and surgery in 38.8%. Overall mortality rate was 52.2%, and varied with the site of infection: 92.9% for disseminated disease, 62.5% for cerebral disease, 60% for pulmonary infection, and 36.4% for cutaneous infection. Survival was worse for those who did not initiate antifungals (p = .04), who were antiretroviral naïve (p = .01), who were admitted to ICU (p = .003) or had disseminated disease (p = .007).
CONCLUSIONS
Mucormycosis is a life-threatening infection in HIV patients and clinician should be aware of this co-infection in the differential diagnosis of HIV opportunistic infections.
Topics: Adult; Antifungal Agents; Coinfection; Cost of Illness; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Immunocompromised Host; Lung Diseases; Male; Middle Aged; Mucormycosis; Neutropenia; Rhizopus; Risk Factors
PubMed: 27394402
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2016.06.013