-
BMJ Open Ophthalmology Jun 2023This systematic review and meta-analysis provides a summary of the efficacy and safety of ranibizumab biosimilars relative to reference ranibizumab anti-vascular... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
TOPIC
This systematic review and meta-analysis provides a summary of the efficacy and safety of ranibizumab biosimilars relative to reference ranibizumab anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).
METHODS
We conducted systematic searches from January 2003 to August 2022 on Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials. We included studies reporting changes in early treatment diabetic retinopathy study-measured best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), number of patients who lost or gained more than 15 letters in BCVA from baseline, changes in retinal thickness and adverse events between treatment arms. The following studies were excluded: studies that did not report visual outcomes following biosimilar and reference ranibizumab intravitreal injections, study arms combining anti-VEGF agents with laser or steroid injections, sham injections as a control comparator, studies without English full texts and non-comparative, observational study design.
RESULTS
Five studies reported on four randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and 1544 eyes at baseline were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The studies in our systematic review found no significant differences between reference ranibizumab and ranibizumab biosimilar medications (FYB201, SB11, RanizuRel and Lupin's ranibizumab) for visual and anatomical outcomes. No significant differences were detected between biosimilar and reference ranibizumab for treatment emergent adverse events (risk ratio, RR 1.06, 95% CI (0.91 to 1.23), p=0.45, I=52%) or IOP-related adverse events with significant heterogeneity (RR 2.59, 95% CI (0.11 to 62.25), p=0.56, I=76%).
CONCLUSION
This systematic review of four RCTs demonstrated no significant difference in visual outcomes, retinal thickness outcomes, as well as meta-analysis of adverse events between biosimilar and reference ranibizumab therapies for nAMD treatment.
Topics: Humans; Ranibizumab; Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Bevacizumab; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A; Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factors; Observational Studies as Topic
PubMed: 37493655
DOI: 10.1136/bmjophth-2022-001205 -
Journal of Hematology & Oncology Oct 2016Monoclonal antibodies and small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) directed against the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) or its receptors have been... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Monoclonal antibodies and small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) directed against the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) or its receptors have been investigated in several studies for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer (GC). In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of angiogenesis inhibitors in advanced GC. We searched published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing angiogenesis inhibitors with non-angiogenesis inhibitors for the treatment of GC. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register were searched. The extracted data on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were measured in terms of hazard ratios (HR) and corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). In addition, risk ratios (RR) and corresponding 95 % CIs were pooled for objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and risk of adverse events (AEs). Ten RCTs involving 2786 patients were included. Compared with non-angiogenesis inhibitor-containing regimens, angiogenesis inhibitor-containing regimens resulted in a significant improvement in OS (HR 0.80, 95 % CI 0.69-0.93, P = 0.004), prolonged PFS (HR 0.66, 95 % CI 0.51-0.86, P = 0.002), and superior ORR (RR 1.34, 95 % CI 1.09-1.65, P = 0.005) and DCR (RR 1.37, 95 % CI 1.17-1.61, P = 0.0001). Angiogenesis inhibitors were associated with a greater number of AEs, but most of these were predictable and manageable. However, hand-foot syndrome, diarrhea, and gastrointestinal (GI) perforation were significantly increased in patients treated with angiogenesis inhibitors. In summary, angiogenesis inhibitor-containing regimens were superior to non-angiogenesis inhibitor-containing regimens in terms of OS, PFS, RR, and DCR in patients with advanced GC.
Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Disease-Free Survival; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stomach Neoplasms; Survival Rate; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 27756337
DOI: 10.1186/s13045-016-0340-8 -
Graefe's Archive For Clinical and... Feb 2023Various treatment regimens are currently practiced in the treatment of CI-DMO (centre-involving diabetic macular oedema). In recent years, there has been a growing body... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
Various treatment regimens are currently practiced in the treatment of CI-DMO (centre-involving diabetic macular oedema). In recent years, there has been a growing body of evidence supporting a treat and extend (T&E) regimen for DMO which offers the promise of comparable visual and anatomical outcomes while reducing injection burden. This meta-analysis was hence performed to evaluate the aforementioned outcomes in the treatment of DMO. Ten studies met the inclusion criteria.
METHODS
A search of PubMed, MEDLINE, Current Contents, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases was performed. We employed the terms 'treat AND extend AND (diabetic AND macular AND edema OR oedema)' to ensure a comprehensive search. The search workflow adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.
RESULTS
The pooled analysis of the mean number of injections in 1 year for T&E-aflibercept (AFL), T&E-ranibizumab (RBZ) and collectively was 9.1 (95% CI: 7.63-10.63), 10.0 (95% CI: 9.55-10.47) and 9.6 (95% CI: 8.62-10.49), respectively. Improvements in vision at 1 year for T&E-AFL, T&E-RBZ and collectively were 6.26 (95% CI: 3.24-9.29), 7.14 (95% CI: 4.76-9.52) and 7.08 (95% CI: 5.32-8.84) letters, respectively. The improvements in central subfield thickness at 1 year for T&E-AFL, T&E-RBZ and collectively were 131.94 (95% CI: 100.29-163.60), 108.64 (95% CI: 82.82-134.46) and 121.32 (95% CI: 102.89-139.75) microns, respectively.
CONCLUSION
The meta-analysis of T&E for DMO did not show a clear advantage in reducing the number of injections compared to landmark clinical trials with pro-re-nata (PRN) treatment regimens in the first year of treatment with limited gains in visual and anatomical outcomes. However, the T&E approach offers the potential for fewer patient visits, thereby reducing treatment burden. Longer term studies on T&E with a standardised protocol would be required to assess the longevity of the vision gain in the first year despite a likely reduced treatment burden compared to the PRN trials.
Topics: Humans; Macular Edema; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A; Visual Acuity; Ranibizumab; Diabetic Retinopathy; Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor; Intravitreal Injections; Recombinant Fusion Proteins; Diabetes Mellitus
PubMed: 35906415
DOI: 10.1007/s00417-022-05770-y -
Eye (London, England) Jan 2023This study aimed to compare efficacy and treatment burden of treat-and-extend (T&E) anti-VEGF against fixed and pro re nata (PRN) regimens for neovascular age-related... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
This study aimed to compare efficacy and treatment burden of treat-and-extend (T&E) anti-VEGF against fixed and pro re nata (PRN) regimens for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and EMBASE were searched. Randomized-controlled trials and observational studies comparing T&E to PRN or fixed dosing for treatment-naïve AMD patients were included. Mean difference (MD) for visual acuity (VA) and number of injections are presented. Risk of bias was assessed according to Cochrane guidelines. Methodology was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). VA improvement was similar with T&E and fixed dosing at one (MD -0.08 letters, p = 0.95) and two years (MD 0.58 letters, p = 0.62). In contrast, VA improvements were significantly greater for T&E when compared against a PRN regimen at one (MD 3.95 letters, p < 0.0001) and two years (MD 4.08 letters, p < 0.001). Significantly fewer ranibizumab injections were administered in the T&E arm at one (MD -2.42 injections, p < 0.0001) and two years (MD -6.06 injections, p < 0.00001) relative to fixed dosing. Fewer aflibercept injections were likewise administered to patients on a T&E regimen versus fixed dosing at one year (MD -0.78 injections, p < 0.0001). Low-certainty evidence from the present synthesis implies that T&E preserves VA similar to fixed schedules with significantly fewer injections at one and two years. Also, patients with T&E dosing achieved better VA outcomes than those on PRN regimen but T&E dosing was associated with more injections.
Topics: Humans; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A; Ranibizumab; Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor; Clinical Protocols; Intravitreal Injections; Treatment Outcome; Recombinant Fusion Proteins; Wet Macular Degeneration; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 35396574
DOI: 10.1038/s41433-022-02020-7 -
The British Journal of Surgery Dec 2014Negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) promotes angiogenesis and granulation, in part by strain-induced production of growth factors and cytokines. As their expression... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) promotes angiogenesis and granulation, in part by strain-induced production of growth factors and cytokines. As their expression profiles are being unravelled, it is pertinent to consider the mode of action of NPWT at the molecular level.
METHODS
MEDLINE (January 1997 to present), Embase (January 1997 to present), PubMed (no time limit), the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register were searched for articles that evaluated the influence of NPWT on growth factor expression quantitatively.
RESULTS
Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Tumour necrosis factor expression was reduced in acute and chronic wounds, whereas expression of interleukin (IL) 1β was reduced in acute wounds only. Systemic IL-10 and local IL-8 expression were increased by NPWT. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor, fibroblast growth factor 2, transforming growth factor β and platelet-derived growth factor was increased, consistent with mechanoreceptor and chemoreceptor transduction in response to stress and hypoxia. Matrix metalloproteinase-1, -2, -9 and -13 expression was reduced but there was no effect on their enzymatic inhibitor, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 1.
CONCLUSION
Cytokine and growth factor expression profiles under NPWT suggest that promotion of wound healing occurs by modulation of cytokines to an anti-inflammatory profile, and mechanoreceptor and chemoreceptor-mediated cell signalling, culminating in angiogenesis, extracellular matrix remodelling and deposition of granulation tissue. This provides a molecular basis for understanding NPWT.
Topics: Animals; Cytokines; Disease Models, Animal; Humans; Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins; Matrix Metalloproteinases; Mice; Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy; Rats; Swine; Wound Healing; Wounds and Injuries
PubMed: 25294112
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9636 -
American Journal of Clinical Dermatology Sep 2022The evidence for adding small-molecule drugs to an ongoing biologic treatment is sparse, but combination therapies appear to be advantageous in appropriately selected...
BACKGROUND
The evidence for adding small-molecule drugs to an ongoing biologic treatment is sparse, but combination therapies appear to be advantageous in appropriately selected patients with psoriasis. To our knowledge, efficacy and safety of combination therapy with apremilast and biologics has not previously been reviewed.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A literature search was performed on Medline (PubMed), Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. Inclusion criteria were a diagnosis of psoriasis, age ≥ 18 years, concomitant treatment with apremilast and a specified biologic agent, and available safety and/or efficacy results. All papers written in English and published from database inception to August 2021 were included. No limit was set regarding study size.
RESULTS
The literature search yielded 447 citations. Of these, 19 studies published from 2015 to 2020 were included in the review. All papers referred to retrospective studies, comprising case reports (n = 9), case series (n = 8), or cohort studies (n = 2). A total of 172 patients with psoriasis were identified. Clinical subtypes included plaque psoriasis (n = 164), palmoplantar pustulosis (n = 7), and acute pustular psoriasis (n = 1). The observation period ranged from 3 weeks to 24 months. Geographical origin of studies was North America (n = 11), Europe (n = 4), and Asia (n = 4). In general, apremilast-biologic combination therapy was reported to be safe; across papers, one serious adverse event was registered (hospitalization due to weight loss). Adverse events (AEs) were otherwise mostly mild and gastrointestinal. No differences in AEs were observed in studies comparing apremilast mono- and combination therapy. In several papers, sufficient information about AEs was not reported or could not be extracted. Clinical response to combination treatment was evaluated at various time points, and only few studies used validated scores. In the remaining papers, efficacy data were descriptive and/or in photographic form, or not available. In total, two patients discontinued therapy due to lack of efficacy.
CONCLUSION
Evidence for combined treatment with apremilast and biologics is limited and restricted to retrospective studies of various quality. Based on available data, apremilast may constitute an efficacious and safe add-on treatment to biologic therapy, but properly conducted clinical investigations are needed.
Topics: Adolescent; Biological Products; Drug Therapy, Combination; Exanthema; Humans; Psoriasis; Retrospective Studies; Thalidomide
PubMed: 35737251
DOI: 10.1007/s40257-022-00703-1 -
Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation :... Jun 2023Vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors (VEGFis) have transformed the treatment of many retinal diseases, including diabetic maculopathy. Increasing evidence... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors (VEGFis) have transformed the treatment of many retinal diseases, including diabetic maculopathy. Increasing evidence supports systemic absorption of intravitreal VEGFi and development of significant cardiorenal side effects.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO: CRD42020189037) of randomised controlled trials of intravitreal VEGFi treatments (bevacizumab, ranibizumab and aflibercept) for any eye disease. Outcomes of interest were cardiorenal side effects (hypertension, proteinuria, kidney function decline and heart failure). Fixed effects meta-analyses were conducted where possible.
RESULTS
There were 78 trials (81 comparisons; 13 175 participants) that met the criteria for inclusion: 47% were trials in diabetic eye disease. Hypertension (29 trials; 8570 participants) was equally common in VEGFi and control groups {7.3 versus 5.4%; relative risk [RR] 1.08 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.91-1.28]}. New or worsening heart failure (10 trials; 3384 participants) had a similar incidence in VEGFi and control groups [RR 1.03 (95% CI 0.70-1.51)]. Proteinuria (5 trials; 1902 participants) was detectable in some VEGFi-treated participants (0.2%) but not controls [0.0%; RR 4.43 (95% CI 0.49-40.0)]. Kidney function decline (9 trials; 3471 participants) was similar in VEGFi and control groups. In participants with diabetic eye disease, the risk of all-cause mortality was higher in VEGFi-treated participants [RR 1.62 (95% CI 1.04-2.46)].
CONCLUSION
In trials of intravitreal VEGFi, we did not identify an increased risk of cardiorenal outcomes, although these outcomes were reported in only a minority of cases. There was an increased risk of death in VEGFi-treated participants with diabetic eye disease. Additional scrutiny of post-licensing observational data may improve the recognition of safety concerns in VEGFi-treated patients.
Topics: Humans; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor; Diabetic Retinopathy; Hypertension; Proteinuria
PubMed: 36318455
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfac305 -
European Journal of Ophthalmology Nov 2022Radiation optic neuropathy (RON) generally follows radiation therapy that exceed 50 Gy to the visual axis and occurs within three years of therapy. Currently, there are... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
Radiation optic neuropathy (RON) generally follows radiation therapy that exceed 50 Gy to the visual axis and occurs within three years of therapy. Currently, there are no universally accepted treatments or prophylaxis for RON. The review aimed to examine the efficacy of all treatments and prophylaxis for RON.
METHODS
MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and gray literature were searched to December 2020. Studies on treatment(s) and/or prophylaxis of RON were included. Results were meta-analyzed using a random-effects model. Primary outcomes included the proportions of patients who experienced improvement, no change, or worsening of visual acuity (VA) for each treatment. Secondary outcome was the incidence of RON for studies on prophylaxis.
RESULTS
Overall, 50 studies (n = 5397) were included. Meta-analysis (n = 1752) showed significantly lower incidence of RON in patients who underwent intravitreal anti-VEGF prophylaxis compared to control (RR 0.64, 95%CI [0.48, 0.86]) for uveal melanoma. Intravitreal anti-VEGF injections (n = 68), hyperbaric oxygen therapy alone (n = 14), and pentoxifylline (n = 5) resulted in improved or stable vision ≤1 logMAR in 54.5%, 42.9%, and 40.0% of patients, respectively. Systemic corticosteroids (n = 82), anticoagulants (n = 12), and systemic bevacizumab (n = 7) showed improved or stable vision ≤1 logMAR in 17.1%, 33.3%, and 14.3% of patients, respectively. Overall risk of bias was low, but evidence was limited to retrospective studies.
CONCLUSION
Intravitreal anti-VEGF injections reduced incidence of RON in irradiated uveal melanoma patients. Systemic corticosteroids, systemic bevacizumab, and warfarin alone are likely ineffective treatments. Early hyperbaric oxygen therapy and intravitreal anti-VEGF injections were most effective among those investigated and require further investigation.
Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Anticoagulants; Bevacizumab; Humans; Intravitreal Injections; Melanoma; Optic Nerve Diseases; Pentoxifylline; Ranibizumab; Retrospective Studies; Uveal Neoplasms; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A; Warfarin
PubMed: 35262423
DOI: 10.1177/11206721221085409 -
PloS One 2016Currently, the standard treatment for newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is maximal safe surgical resection followed by radiation therapy with concurrent and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Currently, the standard treatment for newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is maximal safe surgical resection followed by radiation therapy with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide. However, disease recurs in almost all patients, and the optimal salvage treatment for recurrent GBM remains unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of published clinical trials to assess the efficacy and toxicities of angiogenesis inhibitors alone as salvage treatment in these patients.
METHODS
Trials published between 1994 and 2015 were identified by an electronic search of public databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane library). Demographic data, treatment regimens, objective response rate (ORR), median progression-free survival (PFS), median overall survival (OS), 6-months PFS rate, 1-year OS and grade 3/4 toxicities were extracted. We also compared the main outcomes of interest between bevacizumab and other angiogenesis inhibitors. All analyses were performed using Comprehensive Meta Analysis software (Version 2.0).
RESULTS
A total of 842 patients were included for analysis: 343 patients were treated with bevacizumab, 386 with other angiogenesis inhibitors and 81 with thalidomide. The pooled ORR, 6-months PFS, and 1-year OS for recurrent GBM patients receiving angiogenesis inhibitors was 20.1%, 19.5% and 29.3%, respectively. The use of single agent bevacizumab in recurrent GBM significantly improved ORR and 6-months PFS when compared to other angiogenesis inhibitors [relative risk (RR) 2.93, 95% CI 1.38-6.21; p = 0.025; and RR 2.36 95% CI 1.46-3.82; p<0.001, respectively], while no significant difference in 1-year OS was found between the two groups (p = 0.07). when compared to thalidomide, bevacizumab treatment in recurrent GBM significantly improved ORR (RR 6.8, 95%CI: 2.64-17.6, p<0.001), but not for 6-months PFS (p = 0.07) and 1-year OS (p = 0.31). As for grade 3/4 toxicities, the common toxicity was hypertension with pooled incidence of 12.1%, while high-grade thromboembolic events (2.2%), hemorrhage (5.1%) and GI perforation (2.8%) associated with angiogenesis inhibitors were relatively low.
CONCLUSIONS
In comparison with other angiogenesis inhibitors and thalidomide, the use of single agent bevacizumab as salvage treatment for recurrent GBM patients improve ORR and 6-months PFS, but not for 1-year OS.
Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Bevacizumab; Glioblastoma; Humans; Recurrence; Salvage Therapy; Thalidomide
PubMed: 27007828
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152170 -
Surgical Oncology Dec 2023Surgical resection is the cornerstone of treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) and offers the best chance at long-term survival. Unfortunately, most patients... (Review)
Review
Surgical resection is the cornerstone of treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) and offers the best chance at long-term survival. Unfortunately, most patients do not present with resectable metastatic disease and, among patients who do undergo curative-intent resection, many will develop recurrence. In turn, patients require a multi-disciplinary treatment approach with a combination of chemotherapy, surgery, radiation, and/or liver directed therapies that is guided by patient disease burden and clinical status. The development of targeted therapies has led to varying success in other cancers and has emerged as a treatment option for patients with metastatic CRC. While cytotoxic chemotherapy aims to kill cells as they replicate, targeted therapies are directed at biologic features of cancers, like angiogenesis or immune checkpoints. Targeted therapy can facilitate a more treatment tailored approach to the unique genomic alterations of the tumor and hopefully deliver more personalized therapy. We herein provide a systematic review of approved targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors for metastatic CRC and provide an overview of the current literature.
Topics: Humans; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Rectal Neoplasms; Colonic Neoplasms; Immunotherapy; Colorectal Neoplasms
PubMed: 37742544
DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2023.101993