-
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy =... Jun 2018The study aims to analyze the effectiveness of bevacizumab in addressing the complications associated with gynecological cancers and evaluates effective treatments for... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
The study aims to analyze the effectiveness of bevacizumab in addressing the complications associated with gynecological cancers and evaluates effective treatments for various gynecological cancers.
METHODS
The study follows a systematic review approach that has been implemented to analyze the qualitative published data from previous studies. Studies related with the trials of angiogenesis and bevacizumab were selected in the review.
RESULTS
In general, the management of gynecological cancers include chemotherapy, surgery and radiation therapy. Results suggest bevacizumab as an effective treatment modality for cervical and several other cancers. Overall, bevacizumab showed promising results in improving the overall survival rate of gynecological cancer patients through the combination of bevacizumab with other chemotherapeutic agents.
CONCLUSION
Bevacizumab possess less documented adverse effects when compared to other chemotherapeutic agents. The manifestation and severity of adverse effects reported varied according to the chemotherapeutic agent(s) that were used with bevacizumab in combination therapy. Overall, bevacizumab effectively improved the survival rate in patients with several gynaecological cancers.
Topics: Bevacizumab; Clinical Trials as Topic; Female; Genital Neoplasms, Female; Humans; Models, Biological; Neovascularization, Pathologic; Signal Transduction
PubMed: 29710531
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.03.061 -
OncoTargets and Therapy 2018With the investigation of molecular targets, many agents, such as trastuzumab and ramucirumab, have attained a positive outcome in oncotherapy. Vascular endothelial... (Review)
Review
With the investigation of molecular targets, many agents, such as trastuzumab and ramucirumab, have attained a positive outcome in oncotherapy. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is considered a potent factor in angiogenesis and plays an important role in the growth of tumors. Moreover, both VEGF and its receptor are usually excessively expressed in solid tumors and could be hopeful targets for the treatment of neoplasms. Apatinib (YN968D1) is an oral small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor of VEGFR-2. By inhibiting several signaling transduction pathways, it restrains angiogenesis and subsequently controls tumorigenesis. According to current studies, apatinib shows promising application in various solid tumors as a post-second- and post-third-line treatment. It could significantly improve the median overall survival and progression-free survival of patients with tolerated adverse reactions. This paper aims to summarize the recent research on apatinib including the mechanism, pharmacokinetics, trials, adverse reactions, and prospect as a treatment.
PubMed: 30050305
DOI: 10.2147/OTT.S172305 -
Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs Jun 2016Sorafenib is an orally available compound that acts predominantly by targeting the Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK pathway and by inhibiting the vascular endothelial growth factor... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Sorafenib is an orally available compound that acts predominantly by targeting the Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK pathway and by inhibiting the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Since the Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK pathway is implicated in the proliferation of multiple myeloma (MM) cells and VEGF in bone marrow neovascularization, sorafenib is a drug offering the potential for targeting two important pathogenetic mechanisms involved in MM. Thus, sorafenib is being proposed for use in MM.
AREAS COVERED
In this review, the authors discuss the rationale for the use of sorafenib in MM. They then summarize the clinical development of sorafenib in MM, from initial Phase I to Phase II studies. A systematic literature review of the trials was performed using PubMed.
EXPERT OPINION
Preliminary data from phase I/II trials showed that sorafenib had a good safety profile but minimal anti-myeloma activity as a single agent in relapsed/refractory patients. Results of phase II trials, evaluating sorafenib combined with new drugs, such as bortezomib and lenalidomide are eagerly awaited.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bortezomib; Cell Proliferation; Humans; Lenalidomide; Multiple Myeloma; Niacinamide; Phenylurea Compounds; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Sorafenib; Thalidomide
PubMed: 26998658
DOI: 10.1517/13543784.2016.1169272 -
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical... May 2015Vascular endothelial growth factor signaling pathway plays a crucial role in angiogenesis and has become a promising target for cancer drug development. We aimed to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
Vascular endothelial growth factor signaling pathway plays a crucial role in angiogenesis and has become a promising target for cancer drug development. We aimed to quantify the overall efficacy and safety of angiogenesis inhibitors in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
METHODS
Electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing angiogenesis inhibitors with non-angiogenesis inhibitors for NSCLC patients. The extracted data on objective response rates (ORRs), disease control rates (DCRs), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were pooled. Common adverse events (AEs) were also studied.
RESULTS
A total of 33 RCTs involving 17,396 patients were included. Compared with non-angiogenesis inhibitors, angiogenesis inhibitors resulted in significant improvement in PFS (HR, 0.81; 95 % CI 0.76-0.85; p < 0.001), OS (HR, 0.95; 95 % CI 0.92-0.98; p = 0.004), ORR (RR, 1.54; 95 % CI 1.37-1.73; p < 0.001) and DCR (RR, 1.18; 95 % CI 1.10-1.27; p < 0.001). The AEs associated with angiogenesis inhibitors were generally predictable and manageable.
CONCLUSION
Angiogenesis inhibitors were superior to non-angiogenesis inhibitors in terms of ORR, DCR, PFS and OS in advanced NSCLC patients. Further studies are warranted to explore the predictive biomarkers to pick up those who may gain utmost benefit from anti-angiogenic therapy.
Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Agents; Bevacizumab; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Disease-Free Survival; Hemorrhage; Humans; Indazoles; Indoles; Lung Neoplasms; Niacinamide; Odds Ratio; Phenylurea Compounds; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Quinazolines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor; Signal Transduction; Sorafenib; Sulfonamides; Sunitinib; Thrombocytopenia; Treatment Outcome; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A; Ramucirumab
PubMed: 25373315
DOI: 10.1007/s00432-014-1862-5 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2023Previous studies revealed that Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/Programmed cell death-Ligand protein 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors plus anti-angiogenic agents had extensive... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
The benefit and risk of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus anti-angiogenic agents as second or later-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis of prospective clinical trials.
BACKGROUND
Previous studies revealed that Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/Programmed cell death-Ligand protein 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors plus anti-angiogenic agents had extensive anti-tumor activities. However, almost all studies on the efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus anti-angiogenic agents as second or later-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer are non-randomized controlled trials with small sample sizes, which might lead to a lack of effective metrics to assess the effectiveness and safety of the therapeutic regimen. Here, this meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus anti-angiogenic agents as second or later-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
METHODS
A single-arm meta-analysis was performed, and published literature from PubMed, Web of Science and Embase databases as of January 13, 2023, was systematically retrieved. We used the Cochrane risk of bias tool and methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) Methodological items to evaluate the quality of eligible clinical trials. Outcomes including overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) were extracted for further analysis. The random effect model is used to calculate the pooled parameters.
RESULTS
19 studies (16 were non-comparative single-arm clinical trials and 3 were randomized controlled trials) were enrolled in this meta-analysis. In terms of tumor response, the pooled ORR and DCR were 22.4% (95% CI, 16.6-28.1%) and 76.8% (95% CI, 72.6-81.1%), respectively. With regard to survival analysis, the pooled PFS and OS were 5.20 (95% CI, 4.46-5.93) months and 14.09 (95% CI, 13.20-14.97) months, respectively. The pooled grade ≥3 adverse effect (AE) rate was 47.6% (95% CI, 33.1-62.0%).
CONCLUSION
PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus anti-angiogenic agents has promising efficacy and safety as second or later-line treatment in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42023407559.
Topics: Humans; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Lung Neoplasms; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor; Prospective Studies; Clinical Trials as Topic
PubMed: 37614237
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1218258 -
Oncotarget Dec 2016A meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the risk of wound-healing complications in patients who treated with neoadjuvant-adjuvant bevacizumab in various oncological... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
A meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the risk of wound-healing complications in patients who treated with neoadjuvant-adjuvant bevacizumab in various oncological indications. We searched PUBMED, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library through June 2016 to identify randomized controlled trials of bevacizumab and wound-healing complications. Seven RCTs studies involving 5,147 participants were included in the analysis. Compared with routine therapy, bevacizumab increased the incidence of wound-healing complications for various cancers. The pooled estimate of odds ratio (OR) was 2.32, and the 95 % confidence intervals (CI) was 1.43 to 3.75. (P < 0.001). Subgroup analyses revealed the similar result in colon carcinoma patients. In conclusion, bevacizumab increases the incidence of wound-healing complications for cancers especially for colon neoplasms patients. However, the adverse effect is not appeared in breast cancer, metastatic renal cell carcinoma, non-small-cell lung cancer and gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Due to the findings relying chiefly on data from single or two studies, hence, further research is required to assess the wound-healing complications risk of bevacizumab in each oncological indication.
Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Bevacizumab; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Chi-Square Distribution; Humans; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Neoplasms; Odds Ratio; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Wound Healing
PubMed: 27756883
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.12666 -
Frontiers in Pharmacology 2023According to the 2023 guidelines for treating non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), first-line treatment and recently developed agents for the treatment of epidermal...
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of first-line treatments for of advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer in Asian populations: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
According to the 2023 guidelines for treating non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), first-line treatment and recently developed agents for the treatment of epidermal growth factor (EGFR) mutation-positive locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC were compared in this meta-analysis. Treatment regimens involved in the included studies included first, second, and third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), TKIs plus chemotherapy, TKIs plus angiogenesis inhibitors, and platinum-containing doublet chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab. Considering the varying efficacy and safety of drugs in people of different ethnic origins, the optimal regimen should be determined, and the safety of first-line treatments should be assessed in the Asian population specifically. PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) were systematically searched to retrieve reports on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with research data published from inception to 1 February 2023. Adopting Asian patient populations as the target (including studies in which Asian patients accounted for more than 50% of the sample), a network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted for comparison of treatment regimens and treatments were ranked based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). A total of 19 RCTs involving 5,824 patients and covering 14 treatment regimens were included. The primary outcome measure examined in this study was progression-free survival (PFS); other outcome measures examined were overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR), objective response rate (ORR), occurrence of any adverse events (AE), occurrence of adverse events of grade 3 or above (≥3AE), and occurrence of serious adverse events (SAE). In terms of PFS, all regimens including TKIs (as a monotherapy or in combination with other therapies), as well as bevacizumab (Bev) plus chemotherapy (Ch) were found to be significantly superior to basic chemotherapy (HRs: 0.09-0.61, < 0.05 in all cases compared with Ch alone). The highest-ranking therapies were erlotinib (Erl) plus Bev (SUCRA: 0.94) and Erl plus ramucirumab (Ram) (SUCRA: 0.93). Regarding OS, no significant differences was observed between first-line treatment strategies; the top four treatments based on SUCRA, in rank order, were Bev + Ch (0.87), gefitinib (Gef) plus Ch (0.81), dacomitinib (Dac) (0.79), and osimertinib (Osi) (0.69). Additionally, there were no significant differences between first-line treatment strategies in terms of DCR. Regarding ORR, the top three treatments based on SUCRA were Erl + Bev (0.85), Erl + Ram (0.76), and Gef + Ch (0.74). No significant difference between first-line treatment strategies was observed in terms of the risk of AE. However, based on SUCRA, Erl ranked highest on avoidance of ≥ 3AE (0.97), and Osi ranked highest on avoidance of SAE (0.91). Based on these analyses of survival benefits, tumor burden response, and safety, furmonertinib (Fur), Osi, and aumolertinib (Aum) may represent the best treatment regimen options for Asian patients, significantly prolonging survival (as measured by median PFS/OS), eliciting a greater tumor burden response, and exposing patients to a lower risk of adverse events. Although Erl + Bev and Erl + Ram are associated with the best survival benefits in terms of PFS, further clinical studies are still needed to identify ways to reduce the risk of adverse events. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php? ID=CRD42023407994, identifier CRD42023407994.
PubMed: 37484016
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1212313 -
Cancer Treatment Reviews Feb 2017The cardiovascular risk of angiogenesis inhibitors is not well-quantified. We hypothesized that, compared to direct vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
The cardiovascular risk of angiogenesis inhibitors is not well-quantified. We hypothesized that, compared to direct vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors (anti-VEGF antibodies or decoy receptors), small molecule agents have higher risk due to their less specific mechanism.
METHODS
We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for phase III randomised controlled trials comparing angiogenesis inhibitor-based therapy to other systemic therapy. Outcomes evaluated were hypertension, severe hypertension, cardiac dysfunction, congestive heart failure, cardiac ischemia, arterial thromboembolism, venous thromboembolism, and fatal cardiovascular events. Data were pooled using Mantel-Haenszel random effects method to generate odds ratios (OR).
RESULTS
We identified 77 studies meeting inclusion criteria. Compared to routine care, angiogenesis inhibitors were associated with a higher risk of hypertension (OR 5.28 [4.53-6.15], number needed to harm [NNH] 6), severe hypertension (OR 5.59 [4.67-6.69], NNH 17), cardiac ischemia (OR 2.83 [1.72-4.65], NNH 85) and cardiac dysfunction (OR 1.35 [1.06-1.70], NNH 139). VEGF inhibitors were associated with an increased risk of arterial thromboembolism (OR 1.52 [1.17-1.98], NNH 141). No significant interaction was observed between the two drug subgroups for any outcomes. We identified no significant increase in the risk of the other outcomes evaluated.
CONCLUSION
Angiogenesis inhibitors increase the risk of hypertension, arterial thromboembolism, cardiac ischemia and cardiac dysfunction. There was no significant difference in cardiovascular risk between direct VEGF inhibitors and small molecule agents.
Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Cardiovascular Diseases; Humans; Neoplasms; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 28104567
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2016.12.002 -
International Immunopharmacology Oct 2023Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with angiogenesis inhibitors have been used to treat advanced lung cancer. Their associated treatment-related adverse events (trAEs)... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with angiogenesis inhibitors have been used to treat advanced lung cancer. Their associated treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) are currently considered acceptable; however, no conclusion has been reached. We aimed to summarize the trAEs caused by ICIs combined with angiogenesis inhibitors in patients with advanced lung cancer.
METHODS
Pulled studies met the following criteria: patients with advanced lung cancer who received treatment involving ICIs combined with angiogenesis inhibitors (with or without chemotherapy) in interventional or observational studies. Results included the type and number of trAEs or immune-related adverse events (irAEs), treatment-associated discontinuation and mortality, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS).
PROSPERO
CRD42022337656.
RESULTS
The study enrolled 32 trials involving 2313 patients who had 7768 any-grade trAEs and 1078 grade ≥3 trAEs. The pooled incidences were 87.33% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 79.49-93.65; I = 94.04%) for any-grade trAEs, and 38.63% (95% CI: 28.28-49.50; I = 95.61%) for grade ≥3 trAEs. There were 132 kinds of any-grade trAEs involving 18 systems, and 99 kinds of grade ≥3 trAEs involving 16 systems. For all trAEs, we observed significant differences in the line of therapy, trial design, therapy combination, and types of angiogenesis inhibitors (all P < 0.05). The rate of trAEs increased with dosage and frequency of medication. Pooled incidences of discontinuation and mortality were 10.64% and 0.81%, respectively. Nearly 647 patients experienced irAEs, including 636 any-grade irAEs and 154 grade ≥3 irAEs.
CONCLUSIONS
Overall, the incidence of trAEs caused by ICIs combined with angiogenesis inhibitors is generally acceptable. These trAEs have a wide spectrum nearly covering the full range of adverse events. Grade ≥3 trAEs are more closely associated with angiogenesis inhibitors than any grade. However, treatment-associated mortality remains concerning.
Topics: Humans; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Lung Neoplasms; Progression-Free Survival
PubMed: 37598630
DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2023.110785 -
The Journal of Dermatological Treatment Sep 2018Ustekinumab, a human monoclonal IgG1 antibody targeting the p40-subunit shared by interleukin (IL)12 and IL-23, represents a potential treatment for atopic dermatitis... (Review)
Review
AIM
Ustekinumab, a human monoclonal IgG1 antibody targeting the p40-subunit shared by interleukin (IL)12 and IL-23, represents a potential treatment for atopic dermatitis (AD). We evaluated the efficacy and safety of ustekinumab in the treatment of AD.
METHODS
We reviewed the published literature by searching from PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and ClinicalTrial.gov then retrieved and analyzed several variables from patients records.
RESULTS
Ten studies including eight cases and two RCT, comprising 107 patients, were included in the systematic review. Analysis all studies, a total of 58 patients (54.2%) gained an effective treatment with little adverse events.
CONCLUSIONS
Ustekinumab is a well-tolerated and safe treatment with no significant difference in effect from placebo in patients with AD. Further, larger randomized controlled trials need to be conducted to identify a suitable regimen for AD and provide more evidence for clinical application.
Topics: Databases, Factual; Dermatitis, Atopic; Dermatologic Agents; Humans; Interleukin-12; Interleukin-23; Th1 Cells; Th17 Cells; Treatment Outcome; Ustekinumab
PubMed: 29164954
DOI: 10.1080/09546634.2017.1406894