-
Renal Failure 2023This study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of immunosuppressive agents, specifically Voclosporin, when used in conjunction with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
This study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of immunosuppressive agents, specifically Voclosporin, when used in conjunction with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) induction therapy for the management of lupus nephritis (LN).
METHODS
A systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted on randomized controlled trials investigating the efficacy of immunosuppressant-induced therapy for LN. The random effects model was used in the analysis. I was used to evaluate the heterogeneity of the model. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% credible intervals (CrI) were computed to assess and compare the relative effectiveness and safety of various treatment protocols.
RESULTS
The study included a total of 16 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 2444 patients with LN. The analysis results indicated that there was no significant difference in terms of partial remission (PR) between the drugs. However, when considering complete remission (CR), the combination of Voclosporin with MMF showed the highest remission rate, followed by Tacrolimus (TAC). Unfortunately, Voclosporin in combination with MMF had the highest risk of infection and serious infection, indicating a lower safety profile.
CONCLUSIONS
Voclosporin in combination with MMF demonstrated the highest efficacy as an induction therapy for LN. However, it should be noted that the risk of infection and serious infection was found to be high with this regimen. On the other hand, TAC not only showed efficacy but also had a lower risk of infection and serious infection, making it a favorable option in terms of safety. This study did' not include results on other adverse events.
Topics: Humans; Lupus Nephritis; Cyclophosphamide; Induction Chemotherapy; Network Meta-Analysis; Treatment Outcome; Immunosuppressive Agents; Tacrolimus; Mycophenolic Acid; Remission Induction; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 38087473
DOI: 10.1080/0886022X.2023.2290365 -
International Ophthalmology Oct 2020Trabeculectomy is the most commonly performed surgery for the definitive treatment of glaucoma. Despite its high resolvability, the postoperative period requires high... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Trabeculectomy is the most commonly performed surgery for the definitive treatment of glaucoma. Despite its high resolvability, the postoperative period requires high caution so that excessive filtration or scarring does not occur. This paper aimed to research alternative options to those most used as healing modulators, mitomycin C (MMC) and 5-fluorouracil, commonly associated with complications.
METHODS
This systematic review used the PubMed and SciELO databases, covering publications from 1972 to 2019.
RESULTS
A total of 31 substances and methods were analyzed.
CONCLUSION
Some, such as anti-VEGF, glucocorticoids and betatherapy, did not show results statistically superior to those of MMC. Others, such as the enzyme α5β1-integrin and Ologen, demonstrated efficacy and safety at least similar to that of this drug. In conclusion, further research is still needed for drugs that lead to the same results as mitomycin, but with fewer side effects. More recent studies have focused on technologies that increase communication between target tissues and antifibrotic molecules at the cellular level, being a promising bet for the future.
Topics: Cicatrix; Glaucoma; Humans; Intraocular Pressure; Mitomycin; Trabeculectomy; Wound Healing
PubMed: 32504309
DOI: 10.1007/s10792-020-01454-w -
Neoadjuvant therapy in triple-negative breast cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) Dec 2022Evidence for the preferred neoadjuvant therapy regimen in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is not yet established. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Evidence for the preferred neoadjuvant therapy regimen in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is not yet established.
METHODS
Literature search was conducted from inception to February 12, 2022. Phase 2 and 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating neoadjuvant therapy for TNBC were eligible. The primary outcome was pathologic complete response (pCR); the secondary outcomes were all-cause treatment discontinuation, disease-free survival or event-free survival (DFS/EFS), and overall survival. Odd ratios (OR) with 95% credible intervals (CrI) were used to estimate binary outcomes; hazard ratios (HR) with 95% CrI were used to estimate time-to-event outcomes. Bayesian network meta-analysis was implemented for each endpoint. Sensitivity analysis and network meta-regression were done.
RESULTS
41 RCTs (N = 7109 TNBC patients) were eligible. Compared with anthracycline- and taxane-based chemotherapy (ChT), PD-1 inhibitor plus platinum plus anthracycline- and taxane-based ChT was associated with a significant increased pCR rate (OR 3.95; 95% CrI 1.81-9.44) and a higher risk of premature treatment discontinuation (3.25; 1.26-8.29). Compared with dose-dense anthracycline- and taxane-based ChT, the combined treatment was not associated with significantly improved pCR (OR 2.57; 95% CrI 0.69-9.92). In terms of time-to-event outcomes, PD-1 inhibitor plus platinum plus anthracycline- and taxane-based ChT was associated with significantly improved DFS/EFS (HR 0.42; 95% CrI 0.19-0.81).
CONCLUSIONS
PD-1 inhibitor plus platinum and anthracycline- and taxane-based ChT was currently the most efficacious regimen for pCR and DFS/EFS improvement in TNBC. The choice of chemotherapy backbone, optimization of patient selection with close follow-up and proactive symptomatic managements are essential to the antitumor activity of PD-1 inhibitor.
Topics: Female; Humans; Anthracyclines; Antibiotics, Antineoplastic; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Breast Neoplasms; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Network Meta-Analysis; Platinum; Taxoids; Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms
PubMed: 36265208
DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2022.08.006 -
The Canadian Journal of Neurological... May 2021Venolymphatic malformations are rare benign vascular lesions of the head and neck. Sclerotherapy has become the first-line therapy of these lesions with bleomycin being...
BACKGROUND
Venolymphatic malformations are rare benign vascular lesions of the head and neck. Sclerotherapy has become the first-line therapy of these lesions with bleomycin being a sclerosing agent commonly used.
PURPOSE
To perform a systematic review of the published literature to synthesize evidence on the safety and efficacy of bleomycin for the treatment of head and neck venolymphatic malformations.
DATA SOURCES
A systematic review of the literature (January 1995-May 2019) was performed in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases to identify studies on sclerotherapy of venolymphatic malformations of the head and neck.
STUDY SELECTION
A total of 32 studies with participants met the inclusion criteria among which 1121 patients were included in the systematic review.
DATA ANALYSIS
Two reviewers independently screened and extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. The primary outcome was the subjective or objective reduction of lesion size as well as minor and major complications.
DATA SYNTHESIS
The bleomycin/pingyangmycin sclerotherapy achieved subjective or objective lesion size reduction in 96.3% (95% CI 94.1%-98.5%) of patients. Minor complications were observed in 16.2% and major complications in 1.1%.
CONCLUSION
Bleomycin is a highly effective treatment of venolymphatic malformations of the head and neck with a low rate of major adverse events. This study represents an update on the "available" evidence, but only low-to-moderate quality studies were available.
LIMITATIONS
This study reviewed 32 studies performed in different parts of the world, but there was heterogeneity of the study designs and interventions.
Topics: Bleomycin; Head; Humans; Neck; Sclerosing Solutions; Sclerotherapy; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 32799947
DOI: 10.1017/cjn.2020.178 -
Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia 2023The evidence supporting the use of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors and beta-blockers for the prevention of anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy is... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The evidence supporting the use of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors and beta-blockers for the prevention of anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy is controversial.
OBJECTIVE
We performed a meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of these drugs in preventing cardiotoxicity.
METHODS
The meta-analysis included prospective, randomized studies in adults receiving anthracycline chemotherapy and compared the use of RAAS inhibitors or beta-blockers versus placebo with a follow-up of 6 to 18 months. The primary outcome was change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) during chemotherapy. Secondary outcomes were the incidence of heart failure, all-cause mortality, and changes in end-diastolic measurement. Heterogeneity was assessed by stratification and meta-regression. A significance level of p < 0.05 was adopted.
RESULTS
The search resulted in 17 studies, totaling 1,530 patients. The variation (delta) in LVEF was evaluated in 14 studies. Neurohormonal therapy was associated with a lower delta in pre- versus post-therapy LVEF (weighted mean difference 4.42 [95% confidence interval 2.3 to 6.6]) and higher final LVEF (p < 0.001). Treatment resulted in a lower incidence of heart failure (risk ratio 0.45 [95% confidence interval 0.3 to 0.7]). There was no effect on mortality (p = 0.3). For analysis of LVEF, substantial heterogeneity was documented, which was not explained by the variables explored in the study.
CONCLUSION
The use of RAAS inhibitors and beta-blockers to prevent anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity was associated with less pronounced reduction in LVEF, higher final LVEF, and lower incidence of heart failure. No changes in mortality were observed. (CRD PROSPERO 42019133615).
Topics: Adult; Humans; Renin-Angiotensin System; Stroke Volume; Cardiotoxicity; Ventricular Function, Left; Anthracyclines; Prospective Studies; Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Antibiotics, Antineoplastic; Heart Failure
PubMed: 37255127
DOI: 10.36660/abc.20220298 -
Pharmacotherapy Jun 2023Cytomegalovirus (CMV) and BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) infections after kidney transplant have become increasingly prevalent. Based on previous studies, the mammalian target... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) and BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) infections after kidney transplant have become increasingly prevalent. Based on previous studies, the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors seem like attractive alternatives with antiviral activity. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the incidence of CMV and BKPyV infections in kidney transplantation recipients receiving mTOR inhibitors. This meta-analysis included three comparisons of immunosuppressant regimens commonly used after kidney transplantation: Comparison 1: mTOR inhibitors versus calcineurin inhibitors (CNI); Comparison 2: mTOR inhibitors versus antimetabolites (AM); and Comparison 3: mTOR inhibitors plus a reduced-dose of CNI versus AM plus a standard-dose of CNI. The group containing mTOR inhibitors was the study group and the remaining one was the control group. The incidence of CMV or BKPyV infection defined by positive culture, serology, or polymerase chain reaction testing was the primary outcome. A total of 61 studies involving 13,609 patients were included. As compared with the control group, a significantly decreased risk of CMV and BKPyV infections favoring the mTOR inhibitors-based group was shown in comparisons 1, 2, and 3 (p < 0.05). Compared with the control group in all three comparisons, mTOR inhibitors made no difference in regard to death and graft loss (p > 0.05). Compared with CNI, the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) and anemia was higher with mTOR inhibitors (p < 0.05). In comparisons 2 and 3, the risk of new-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM) was higher with mTOR inhibitors (p < 0.05). Early introduction of mTOR inhibitors reduced more CMV infections in comparisons 1 and 2 (p < 0.05). The mTOR inhibitor-based regimen is an attractive alternative with lower risk of CMV and BKPyV infections in kidney transplant recipients. The combination regimen is more appropriate and acceptable than the mTOR-inhibitor monotherapy-based regimen. Early introduction of mTOR inhibitors is recommended, although it is worth noting that attention should be paid to wound healing when mTOR inhibitors are introduced early.
Topics: Humans; Calcineurin Inhibitors; Cytomegalovirus; Cytomegalovirus Infections; Incidence; Kidney Transplantation; MTOR Inhibitors; Polyomavirus Infections; Sirolimus; TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases
PubMed: 37002621
DOI: 10.1002/phar.2799 -
Clinical Rheumatology Feb 2024Immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) is a challenging disease in its presentation and management as it may cause life-threatening hemorrhaging in vital organs and may... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) is a challenging disease in its presentation and management as it may cause life-threatening hemorrhaging in vital organs and may resist several lines of treatment. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in treating patients with ITP.
METHODS
We systematically searched four electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) from inception until 10 October 2022. We included all clinical trials, either controlled or single arm, and prospective and retrospective observational studies that evaluate the efficacy and safety of MMF in patients with ITP. We assessed the risk of bias using three tools (ROBINS-I, Cochrane ROB-2, and NIH), each for eligible study design.
RESULTS
Nine studies were included in this meta-analysis, with a total of 411 patients with ITP. We found that MMF demonstrated an overall response rate of (62.09%; 95% CI = [43.29 to 77.84]) and the complete response rate was (46.75%; 95% CI = [24.84 to 69.99]). The overall proportion of adverse events was (12%; 95% CI = [6 to 24]). After the sensitivity analysis, the overall response rate became 50%; 95% CI = [38 to 63]) and the complete response rate became (32%; 95% CI = [24 to 42]). However, MMF did not appear to affect white blood cell counts or hemoglobin levels significantly.
CONCLUSION
This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrate that MMF appears to be an effective and relatively safe treatment option for patients with ITP when combined with steroids and even in those who have not responded to standard therapies (steroid-resistant cases). Further research with well-designed studies is warranted to better understand the factors influencing treatment response and to refine the use of MMF in the management of ITP. An interactive version of our analysis can be accessed from here: https://databoard.shinyapps.io/mycophenolate_meta/.
Topics: Humans; Mycophenolic Acid; Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic; Retrospective Studies; Prospective Studies; Steroids; Immunosuppressive Agents
PubMed: 37981614
DOI: 10.1007/s10067-023-06820-4 -
The American Journal of Cardiology Jul 2015The superiority of everolimus-eluting stents (EES) over sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) for long-term clinical outcomes has not been yet firmly established. We conducted... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
The superiority of everolimus-eluting stents (EES) over sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) for long-term clinical outcomes has not been yet firmly established. We conducted a systematic review and a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing EES directly with SES using the longest available follow-up data. We searched PubMed, the Cochrane database, and ClinicalTrials.gov for RCTs comparing outcomes between EES and SES and identified 13,434 randomly assigned patients from 14 RCTs. EES was associated with significantly lower risks than SES for definite stent thrombosis (ST), definite/probable ST, target-lesion revascularization (TLR), and major adverse cardiac events (MACE). The risks for all-cause death and myocardial infarction were similar between EES and SES. By the stratified analysis according to the timing after stent implantation, the favorable trend of EES relative to SES for ST, TLR, and MACE was consistently observed both within and beyond 1 year. The lower risk of EES relative to SES for MACE beyond 1 year was statistically significant (pooled odds ratio 0.77, 95% confidence interval 0.61 to 0.96, p = 0.02). In conclusion, the current meta-analysis of 14 RCTs directly comparing EES with SES suggested that EES provided improvement in both safety and efficacy; EES compared with SES was associated with significantly lower risk for definite ST, definite/probable ST, TLR, and MACE. The direction and magnitude of the effect beyond 1 year were comparable with those observed within 1 year.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 25960378
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.03.059 -
Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta. Reviews... Jul 2022Anthocyanins have been associated with beneficial effects on human health. Cancer has been one of the main public health issues due to its aggressiveness and high... (Review)
Review
Anthocyanins have been associated with beneficial effects on human health. Cancer has been one of the main public health issues due to its aggressiveness and high mortality rate. This systematic review aimed to address recent research (from January 2000 to September 2021) on the anticancer activity of anthocyanins assessed by in vitro assays. The selected studies revealed that anthocyanins have anticancer potential by inhibiting cancer cell viability and proliferation, controlling cell cycle, and promoting apoptosis.
Topics: Anthocyanins; Apoptosis; Cell Proliferation; Cell Survival; Humans; Plant Extracts
PubMed: 35714889
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2022.188748 -
Liver Transplantation : Official... Apr 2023NAFLD can occur after liver transplantation (LT), as recurrence or de novo hepatic steatosis (HS). We aimed to evaluate the literature on prevalence, risk factors, and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
NAFLD can occur after liver transplantation (LT), as recurrence or de novo hepatic steatosis (HS). We aimed to evaluate the literature on prevalence, risk factors, and prognosis of post-LT HS. Systematic review with meta-analysis through a search on: PUBMED, Scopus, and Web-of-Science, from inception until the September 30, 2021. Forty studies were included, representing 6979 patients. The post-LT HS prevalence was 39.76% (95% CI, 34.06-45.46), with a rising kinetics (11.06% increase per decade, p =0.04), and a geographical distribution (15.10% more prevalent in American continent compared with Europe and Asia). Recurrent HS was up to 5-fold more likely than de novo HS [OR: 5.38 (2.69-10.76)]. Metabolic disturbances were stronger risk factors in the post-LT recipient [obesity: OR: 4.62 (3.07-6.96); metabolic syndrome: OR: 3.26 (2.03-5.25)] as compared with pre-LT recipients, with the exception of diabetes mellitus, which doubled the risk at any set [pre-LT diabetes mellitus: OR: 2.06 (1.58-2.68); post-LT diabetes mellitus: OR: 2.12 (1.73-2.59)]. Donor factors were not the relevant risk factors for post-LT HS and the only immunosuppressive drug associated with increased risk was sirolimus [OR: 1.68 (1.07-2.64)]. The prevalence of post-LT steatohepatitis was 28.82% (19.62-38.03) and the strongest risk factor was pre-LT NAFLD. Limited outcomes data suggest that post-LT HS did not increase the risk for liver cirrhosis or mortality in these studies. Two out of 5 patients submitted to LT will develop post-LT HS, being recurrent HS more common than de novo HS. Diabetes mellitus and post-LT metabolic syndrome are the strongest risk factors for HS and baseline NAFLD for steatohepatitis. All transplanted patients should be enrolled in lifestyle interventions to prevent post-LT metabolic syndrome, and sirolimus should be avoided in high-risk patients.
Topics: Humans; Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease; Liver Transplantation; Metabolic Syndrome; Risk Factors; Diabetes Mellitus; Sirolimus
PubMed: 36735478
DOI: 10.1097/LVT.0000000000000060