-
Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport Jan 2016To examine whether differences in arterial diameter exist between athletes participating in endurance, resistance or mixed exercise training. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES
To examine whether differences in arterial diameter exist between athletes participating in endurance, resistance or mixed exercise training.
DESIGN
A systematic review with meta-analysis.
METHODS
Random effects meta-analyses of the weighted mean difference in aortic, carotid, brachial and femoral arterial diameters, height and body mass were conducted on data from 16 peer-reviewed studies indexed on PubMed, MEDLINE, SCOPUS and Sport Discus. Effect sizes were calculated as the standardised difference in means (δ), and used to compare endurance (n=163), resistance (n=192), and mixed trained athletes (n=360), with controls (n=440).
RESULTS
Compared to controls, endurance athletes displayed the greatest difference in diameter in the brachial artery (δ=1.84, 95% CI: 0.59, 3.09, p<0.01), whereas for mixed athletes, the greatest difference in diameter occurred in the femoral artery (δ=3.65, 95% CI: 2.21, 5.10, p<0.01), despite there being no differences in height or body mass between these groups. Resistance athletes had a significantly greater body mass (p=0.047) and aortic diameter (δ=1.81, 95% CI: 1.58, 2.05, p<0.01) than controls, however differences in other vessels could not be determined through meta-analysis due to insufficient data.
CONCLUSIONS
Our results provide evidence for localised arterial differences, which occur more extensively in peripheral vessels (brachial and femoral). Chronically, vascular remodelling may occur as a result of the specific haemodynamic conditions within each vessel, which likely differs depending on the mode of exercise. In the future, empirical research is needed to understand the effect of resistance training on chronic vascular remodelling, as this is not well documented.
Topics: Adaptation, Physiological; Arteries; Humans; Physical Conditioning, Human; Physical Endurance; Resistance Training; Vascular Remodeling
PubMed: 25579977
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2014.12.007 -
Cureus Dec 2022Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune condition in which the body's joints are attacked by the immune system, leaving the patient disabled in severe cases, with... (Review)
Review
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune condition in which the body's joints are attacked by the immune system, leaving the patient disabled in severe cases, with irreversible joint damage and a lower quality of life. RA patients are more likely to develop cardiovascular (CV) disease, which increases their risk of morbidity and mortality. This study systematically reviews various CV diseases that might occur with RA including heart failure (HF), coronary artery disease, acute coronary syndrome, ischemic heart disease, stroke, cardiac death, venous thromboembolism, and valvular diseases. The relation between these complications and RA is specifically assessed. Systematic search was carried out on literature reporting the risk of each of the CV diseases in RA patients from databases in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The databases searched were MEDLINE (through PubMed) and Google Scholar using a combination of keywords and medical subject headings (MeSH). Our keywords were mainly "cardiovascular diseases" and "arthritis and rheumatoid". We found a total of 33 articles reporting each CV comorbidity. Interestingly, a wide spectrum of CV diseases is reported in patients with RA. Many tools were implemented in the diagnosis of each disease such as carotid intima-media thickness for atherosclerosis and echocardiography for HF. We confirmed that RA is associated with an increased risk of different CV events, and prophylactic measures should be implemented.
PubMed: 36632250
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.32308 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jun 2020Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a state of critical end-organ hypoperfusion due to a primary cardiac disorder. For people with refractory CS despite maximal vasopressors,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a state of critical end-organ hypoperfusion due to a primary cardiac disorder. For people with refractory CS despite maximal vasopressors, inotropic support and intra-aortic balloon pump, mortality approaches 100%. Mechanical assist devices provide mechanical circulatory support (MCS) which has the ability to maintain vital organ perfusion, to unload the failing ventricle thus reduce intracardiac filling pressures which reduces pulmonary congestion, myocardial wall stress and myocardial oxygen consumption. This has been hypothesised to allow time for myocardial recovery (bridge to recovery) or allow time to come to a decision as to whether the person is a candidate for a longer-term ventricular assist device (VAD) either as a bridge to heart transplantation or as a destination therapy with a long-term VAD.
OBJECTIVES
To assess whether mechanical assist devices improve survival in people with acute cardiogenic shock.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid) and Web of Science Core Collection in November 2019. In addition, we searched three trials registers in August 2019. We scanned reference lists and contacted experts in the field to obtain further information. There were no language restrictions.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised controlled trials on people with acute CS comparing mechanical assist devices with best current intensive care management, including intra-aortic balloon pump and inotropic support.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We performed data collection and analysis according to the published protocol. Primary outcomes were survival to discharge, 30 days, 1 year and secondary outcomes included, quality of life, major adverse cardiovascular events (30 days/end of follow-up), dialysis-dependent (30 days/end of follow-up), length of hospital stay and length of intensive care unit stay and major adverse events. We used the five GRADE considerations (study limitations, consistency of effect, imprecision, indirectness, and publication bias) to assess the quality of a body of evidence as it relates to the studies which contribute data to the meta-analyses for the prespecified outcomes Summary statistics for the primary endpoints were risk ratios (RR), hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
MAIN RESULTS
The search identified five studies from 4534 original citations reviewed. Two studies included acute CS of all causes randomised to treatment using TandemHeart percutaneous VAD and three studies included people with CS secondary to acute myocardial infarction who were randomised to Impella CP or best medical management. Meta-analysis was performed only to assess the 30-day survival as there were insufficient data to perform any further meta-analyses. The results from the five studies with 162 participants showed mechanical assist devices may have little or no effect on 30-day survival (RR of 1.01 95% CI 0.76 to 1.35) but the evidence is very uncertain. Complications such as sepsis, thromboembolic phenomena, bleeding and major adverse cardiovascular events were not infrequent in both the MAD and control group across the studies, but these could not be pooled due to inconsistencies in adverse event definitions and reporting. We identified four randomised control trials assessing mechanical assist devices in acute CS that are currently ongoing.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
There is no evidence from this review of a benefit from MCS in improving survival for people with acute CS. Further use of the technology, risk stratification and optimising the use protocols have been highlighted as potential reasons for lack of benefit and are being addressed in the current ongoing clinical trials.
Topics: Acute Disease; Coronary Care Units; Heart-Assist Devices; Humans; Length of Stay; Quality of Life; Renal Dialysis; Shock, Cardiogenic
PubMed: 32496607
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013002.pub2 -
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine 2023Cardiac valve calcification (CVC) is highly prevalent and a risk factor for adverse outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). This meta-analysis aimed to... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Cardiac valve calcification (CVC) is highly prevalent and a risk factor for adverse outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the risk factors for CVC and association between CVC and mortality in CKD patients.
METHOD
Three electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched for relevant studies up to November 2022. Hazard ratios (HR), odds ratios (OR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled using random-effect meta-analyses.
RESULTS
22 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled analyses showed that CKD patients with CVC were relatively older, had a higher body mass index, left atrial dimension, C-reaction protein level, and a declined ejection fraction. Calcium and phosphate metabolism dysfunction, diabetes, coronary heart disease, and duration of dialysis were all predictors for CVC in CKD patients. The presence of CVC (both aortic valve and mitral valve) increased the risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in CKD patients. However, the prognostic value of CVC for mortality was not significant anymore in patients with peritoneal dialysis.
CONCLUSION
CKD patients with CVC had a greater risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Multiple associated factors for development of CVC in CKD patients should be taken into consideration by healthcare professionals to improve prognosis.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier [CRD42022364970].
PubMed: 37180797
DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1120634 -
Journal of Osteopathic Medicine Jan 2021The Reporting Items for Practice Guidelines in Health Care (RIGHT) Statement was developed by a multidisciplinary team of experts to improve reporting quality and...
CONTEXT
The Reporting Items for Practice Guidelines in Health Care (RIGHT) Statement was developed by a multidisciplinary team of experts to improve reporting quality and transparency in clinical practice guideline development.
OBJECTIVE
To assess the quality of reporting in clinical practice guidelines put forth by the Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) and their adherence to the RIGHT statement checklist.
METHODS
In March 2018, using the 22 criteria listed in the RIGHT statement, two researchers independently documented adherence to each item for all eligible guidelines listed by the SIR by reading through each guideline and using the RIGHT statement elaboration and explanation document as a guide to determine if each item was appropriately addressed as listed in the checklist. To qualify for inclusion in this study, each guideline must have met the strict definition for a clinical practice guideline as set forth by the National Institute of Health and the Institute of Medicine, meaning they were informed by a systematic review of evidence and intended to direct patient care and physician decisions. Guidelines were excluded if they were identified as consensus statements, position statements, reporting standards, and training standards or guidelines. After exclusion criteria were applied, the two researchers scored each of the remaining clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) using a prespecified abstraction Google form that reflected the RIGHT statement checklist (22 criteria; 35 items inclusive of subset questions). Each item on the abstraction form consisted of a "yes/no" option; each item on the RIGHT checklist was recorded as "yes" if it was included in the guideline and "no" if it was not. Each checklist item was weighed equally. Partial adherence to checklist items was recorded as "no." Data were extracted into Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corporation) for statistical analysis.
RESULTS
The initial search results yielded 129 CPGs in the following areas: 13 of the guidelines were in the field of interventional oncology; 16 in neurovascular disorders; five in nonvascular interventions; four in pediatrics; 25 in peripheral, arterial, and aortic disease; one in cardiac; one in portal and mesenteric vascular disease; 37 in practice development and safety; three in spine and musculoskeletal disorders; 14 in venous disease; five in renal failure/hemodialysis; and five in women's health. Of the 46 guidelines deemed eligible for evaluation by the RIGHT checklist, 12 of the checklist items showed less than 25% adherence and 13 showed more than 75% adherence. Of 35 individual RIGHT statement checklist items, adherence was found for a mean (SD) of 22.9 items (16.3). The median number of items with adherence was 21 (interquartile range, 7.5-38).
CONCLUSION
The quality of reporting in interventional radiology guidelines is lacking in several key areas, including whether patient preferences were considered, whether costs and resources were considered, the strength of the recommendations, and the certainty of the body of evidence. Poor adherence to the RIGHT statement checklist in these guidelines reveals many areas for improvement in guideline reporting.
Topics: Checklist; Delivery of Health Care; Humans; Radiology, Interventional; Societies; United States
PubMed: 33512392
DOI: 10.1515/jom-2020-0024 -
Scientific Reports Oct 2022Sarcopenia is characterised by chronically reduced skeletal muscle volume and function, and is determined radiologically by psoas and skeletal muscle measurement. The... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Sarcopenia is characterised by chronically reduced skeletal muscle volume and function, and is determined radiologically by psoas and skeletal muscle measurement. The present systematic review and meta-analysis aims to examine the relationship between pre-operative CT-derived psoas and skeletal muscle parameters and outcomes in patients undergoing EVAR and F/B-EVAR for aortic aneurysm. The MEDLINE database was interrogated for studies investigating the effect of pre-operative CT-diagnosed sarcopenia on outcomes following EVAR and F/B-EVAR. The systematic review was carried out in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. The primary outcome was overall mortality. RevMan 5.4.1 was used to perform meta-analysis. PROSPERO Database Registration Number: CRD42021273085. Ten relevant studies were identified, one reporting skeletal muscle parameters, and the remaining nine reporting psoas muscle parameters, which were used for meta-analysis. There were a total of 2563 patients included (2062 EVAR, 501 F/B-EVAR), with mean follow-up ranging from 25 to 101 months. 836 patients (33%) were defined as radiologically sarcopenic. In all studies, the combined HR for all-cause mortality in sarcopenic versus non-sarcopenic patients was 2.61 (1.67-4.08), p < .001. Two studies reported outcomes on patients undergoing F/B-EVAR; the combined HR for all-cause mortality in sarcopenic versus non-sarcopenic patients was 3.08 (1.66-5.71), p = .004. Radiological sarcopenia defined by psoas or skeletal muscle parameters was associated with inferior survival in patients undergoing both EVAR and F/B-EVAR. Current evidence is limited by heterogeneity in assessment of body composition and lack of a consensus definition of radiological sarcopenia.
Topics: Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation; Endovascular Procedures; Humans; Psoas Muscles; Risk Factors; Sarcopenia; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 36198699
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-20490-3 -
Cardiovascular Ultrasound Dec 2019Left ventricular hypertrophy and diastolic dysfunction are common echocardiographic features of both aortic valve stenosis (AS) and cardiac amyloidosis (CA). These two...
BACKGROUND
Left ventricular hypertrophy and diastolic dysfunction are common echocardiographic features of both aortic valve stenosis (AS) and cardiac amyloidosis (CA). These two different entities therefore may mask each other. From recent years, there is a growing body of evidence about the relatively high incidence of wild-type transthyretin (wtTTR) amyloidosis in AS, but there are scarce data on the prevalence of AS in CA, particularly in AL-type amyloidosis. The echocardiographic approach to these patients is not obvious, and not evidence based. We aimed to study the prevalence, severity, and type of AS in patients with CA and also to evaluate the potential of echocardiography in the diagnostic process.
METHODS
Between January 2009 and January 2019, we retrospectively analyzed the clinical and echocardiographic data, and the echocardiographic work up of 55 consecutive CA patients.
RESULTS
80% of our CA patients had AL amyloidosis. We identified 5 patients (9%) with moderate to severe AS: two with moderate AS and three with low-flow, low-grade AS (LFLG AS). Further analysis of the latter three patients with dobutamine stress echocardiography revealed pseudo-severe LFLG AS in two, and true-severe AS in one patient.
CONCLUSION
The prevalence of moderate to severe AS is 9% in our population of CA patients, the majority of whom have AL amyloidosis. Dobutamine echocardiography seems to be appropriate for the further characterization of patients with LFLG AS, even with normal ejection fraction.
Topics: Aged; Amyloidosis; Aortic Valve Stenosis; Cardiomyopathies; Echocardiography; Female; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 31878928
DOI: 10.1186/s12947-019-0182-y -
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine 2022Patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) remains one out of many factors to be considered during decision-making for the treatment of aortic valve pathologies. The idea of...
Patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) remains one out of many factors to be considered during decision-making for the treatment of aortic valve pathologies. The idea of adequate sizing of a prosthetic heart valve was established by Rahimtoola already in 1978. In this article, the author described the phenomenon that the orifice area of a prosthetic heart valve may be too small for the individual patient. PPM is assessed by measurement or projection of the prosthetic effective orifice area indexed to body surface area (iEOA), while it is recommended to use different cut point values for non-obese and obese patients for the categorization of moderate and severe PPM. Several factors influence the accuracy of both the projected and the measured iEOA for PPM assessment, which leads to a certain number of false assignments to the PPM or no PPM group. Despite divergent findings on the impact of PPM on clinical outcomes, there is consensus that PPM should be avoided to prevent sequelae of increased prosthetic gradients after aortic valve replacement. To prevent PPM, it is required to anticipate the iEOA of the prosthesis prior to the procedure. The use of adequate reference tables, derived from echocardiographically measured mean effective orifice area (EOA) values from preferably large numbers of patients, is most appropriate to predict the iEOA. Such tables should be used also for transcatheter heart valves in the future. During the decision-making process, all available options should be taken into account for the individual patient. If the predicted size and type of a surgical prosthesis cannot be implanted, additional surgical procedures, such as annular enlargement with the Manougian technique, or alternative procedures, such as transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) can prevent PPM. PPM prevention for TAVI patients is a new field of interest and includes anticipation of the iEOA, prosthesis selection, and procedural strategies.
PubMed: 35433878
DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.761917 -
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders Oct 2023Obesity may increase perioperative mortality of acute Stanford type A aortic dissection (ATAAD). However, the available evidence was limited. This study aimed to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Obesity may increase perioperative mortality of acute Stanford type A aortic dissection (ATAAD). However, the available evidence was limited. This study aimed to systematically review published literatures about body mass index (BMI) and perioperative mortality of ATAAD.
METHODS
Electronic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library databases. All observational studies that investigated BMI and perioperative mortality of ATAAD were included. Pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using a random-effects model. Meta-regression analysis was performed to assess the effects of different clinical variables on BMI and perioperative mortality of ATAAD. Sensitivity analysis was performed to determine the sources of heterogeneity. Egger's linear regression method and funnel plot were used to determine the publication bias.
RESULTS
A total of 12 studies with 5,522 patients were eligible and included in this meta-analysis. Pooled analysis showed that perioperative mortality of ATAAD increased by 22% for each 1 kg/m increase in BMI (OR = 1.22, 95% CI: 1.10-1.35). Univariable meta-regression analysis indicated that age and female gender significantly modified the association between BMI and perioperative mortality of ATAAD in a positive manner (meta-regression on age: coefficient = 0.04, P = 0.04; meta-regression on female gender: coefficient = 0.02, P = 0.03). Neither significant heterogeneity nor publication bias were found among included studies.
CONCLUSIONS
BMI is closely associated with perioperative mortality of ATAAD. Optimal perioperative management needs to be further explored and individualized for obese patient with ATAAD, especially in elderly and female populations.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
PROSPERO (CRD42022358619). BMI and perioperative mortality of ATAAD.
Topics: Humans; Female; Aged; Body Mass Index; Obesity; Aortic Dissection
PubMed: 37907847
DOI: 10.1186/s12872-023-03517-z