-
Journal of Vascular Surgery Sep 2017Postoperative delirium (PODE) remains a common complication after vascular surgery procedures although the exact pathogenesis remains unclear, mainly because of its... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
Postoperative delirium (PODE) remains a common complication after vascular surgery procedures although the exact pathogenesis remains unclear, mainly because of its multifactorial character. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate pooled data on potential risk factors for PODE in patients undergoing vascular surgery procedures.
METHODS
A systematic literature review was conducted conforming to established criteria to identify eligible articles published from 1990 to 2016. Eligible studies evaluated potential risk factors for PODE after vascular surgery procedures, using both univariate and multivariate analysis. PODE was defined as a disturbance of consciousness with reduced ability to focus, sustain, or shift attention after vascular surgery procedures and was diagnosed in all studies using well-established criteria. Only risk factors reported in at least four studies were included in this review. Pooled results were calculated, and further multivariate regression analysis was conducted.
RESULTS
Overall, nine studies (published from 2003 to 2015) including 2388 patients in total were evaluated (457 with and 1931 without PODE). Patients with PODE were older (73.27 vs 69.87 years; P < .0001) and showed a higher male sex rate (78.1% vs 73.5%; P = .043). Open aortic surgery was the most frequent procedure in this analysis, followed by lower limb revascularization. Patients with PODE also showed higher rates of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, cardiac disease, and neurologic disease; lower hemoglobin level; larger duration of surgery; longer hospital and intensive care unit stay; and higher blood loss. Mean age (odds ratio [OR], 3.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.933-4.034; P < .0001), hypertension (OR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.469-2.554; P < .0001), cardiac disease (OR, 3.16; 95% CI, 2.324-4.284; P < .0001), open aortic surgery (OR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.421-2.143; P < .0001), blood loss (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.007-1.010; P < .0001), hospital stay (OR, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.953-2.614; P <. 0001), and intensive care unit stay (OR, 6.12; 95% CI, 4.699-7.957; P < .0001) were identified as the strongest risk predictors for PODE, followed by male sex, diabetes mellitus, neurologic disease, and history of smoking. However, body mass index, renal failure, preoperative hemoglobin level, and general anesthesia were not found to be risk factors for PODE in such patients.
CONCLUSIONS
This study has confirmed that PODE after vascular surgery procedures is a multifactorial disease, and several independent risk factors have been identified. However, pooled data regarding the effect of PODE on primary outcomes after vascular surgery procedures are still lacking. The results of this review could contribute to the designation of future prediction models and improve prevention of PODE in these patients.
Topics: Aged; Delirium; Female; Humans; Male; Odds Ratio; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome; Vascular Surgical Procedures
PubMed: 28583731
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.03.439 -
Journal of Endovascular Therapy : An... Feb 2017To provide an updated systematic literature review and summarize current evidence on proximal aortic neck dilatation (AND) after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
To provide an updated systematic literature review and summarize current evidence on proximal aortic neck dilatation (AND) after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR).
METHODS
A review of the English-language medical literature from 1991 to 2015 was conducted using MEDLINE and EMBASE to identify studies reporting AND after EVAR. Studies considered for inclusion and full-text review fulfilled the following criteria: (1) reported AND after EVAR, (2) included at least 5 patients, and (3) provided data on AND quantification. The search identified 26 articles published between 1998 and 2015 that encompassed 9721 patients (median age 71.8 years; 9439 men).
RESULTS
AND occurred in 24.6% of patients (95% CI 18.6% to 31.8%) over a period ranging from 15 months to 9 years after EVAR. No significant dilatation of the suprarenal part of the aorta was reported by most studies. The incidence of combined clinical events (endoleak type I, migration, reintervention during follow-up) was higher in the AND group (26%) when compared with 2% in the group without AND (OR 28.7, 95% CI 5.43 to 151.67, p<0.001).
CONCLUSION
AND affects a considerable proportion of EVAR patients and was related to worse clinical outcome, as indicated by increased rates of type I endoleak, migration, and reinterventions. Future studies should focus on a better understanding of the pathophysiology, predictors, and risk factors of AND, which could identify patients who may warrant a different EVAR strategy and/or a closer post-EVAR surveillance strategy.
Topics: Aorta, Abdominal; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation; Chi-Square Distribution; Dilatation, Pathologic; Endoleak; Endovascular Procedures; Foreign-Body Migration; Humans; Odds Ratio; Retreatment; Risk Factors; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 27974495
DOI: 10.1177/1526602816673325 -
PloS One 2017Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has been demonstrated to be an alternative treatment for severe aortic stenosis in patients considered as high surgical... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has been demonstrated to be an alternative treatment for severe aortic stenosis in patients considered as high surgical risk. Since its first human implantation by Cribier et al., TAVI has been shown to increase survival rate and quality of life for high surgical risks patients. The objective of this study is to provide an overview of TAVI registries and the reporting clinical outcomes based on the VARC-2 definitions. In addition, the comparability and adherence of VARC-2 reporting within the identified TAVI registries was reviewed.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A systematic review of TAVI registries reporting VARC-2 definitions has been performed in line with PRISMA guidelines in PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus databases and EMBASE. Based on VARC-2, patients' characteristics and procedure characteristics, 30-day clinical outcomes, 1-year mortality and composited endpoints were extracted from each registry's publications.
RESULTS
This review identified 466 studies that were potentially relevant, and 20 TAVI registries reported VARC-2 definitions involved in our present review. Of all 20 registries, an overall sample size of 12,583 patients was involved. The 30-day all-cause mortality ranged from 0 to 12.7%. From 20 registries, 14 registries reported the cardiovascular mortality at 30 days. 9 registries reported myocardial infarction (MI) rate based on VARC-2 definitions, and 7 registries reported peri-procedural MI rate (<72h). In our review, most of registries presented MI rates ranging from 0.5% to 2%. The majority of registries have reported complications such as bleeding, vascular complications and new pacemaker implantation.
CONCLUSION
Since the introduction of VARC definitions from 2011, VARC and VARC-2 definitions are still not systematically used by all TAVI studies. These endpoint definitions warrant a concise and systemic analysis of outcome measures. Reporting TAVI-outcome uniformly makes study result comparison feasible. This definitely will increase patient safety, additionally to provide sufficient evidence to support decision makers like regulatory bodies, HTA agencies, payers.
Topics: Aortic Valve Stenosis; Decision Support Techniques; Female; Guideline Adherence; Humans; Male; Quality of Life; Registries; Sample Size; Survival Analysis; Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 28910289
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180815 -
Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport Jan 2016To examine whether differences in arterial diameter exist between athletes participating in endurance, resistance or mixed exercise training. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES
To examine whether differences in arterial diameter exist between athletes participating in endurance, resistance or mixed exercise training.
DESIGN
A systematic review with meta-analysis.
METHODS
Random effects meta-analyses of the weighted mean difference in aortic, carotid, brachial and femoral arterial diameters, height and body mass were conducted on data from 16 peer-reviewed studies indexed on PubMed, MEDLINE, SCOPUS and Sport Discus. Effect sizes were calculated as the standardised difference in means (δ), and used to compare endurance (n=163), resistance (n=192), and mixed trained athletes (n=360), with controls (n=440).
RESULTS
Compared to controls, endurance athletes displayed the greatest difference in diameter in the brachial artery (δ=1.84, 95% CI: 0.59, 3.09, p<0.01), whereas for mixed athletes, the greatest difference in diameter occurred in the femoral artery (δ=3.65, 95% CI: 2.21, 5.10, p<0.01), despite there being no differences in height or body mass between these groups. Resistance athletes had a significantly greater body mass (p=0.047) and aortic diameter (δ=1.81, 95% CI: 1.58, 2.05, p<0.01) than controls, however differences in other vessels could not be determined through meta-analysis due to insufficient data.
CONCLUSIONS
Our results provide evidence for localised arterial differences, which occur more extensively in peripheral vessels (brachial and femoral). Chronically, vascular remodelling may occur as a result of the specific haemodynamic conditions within each vessel, which likely differs depending on the mode of exercise. In the future, empirical research is needed to understand the effect of resistance training on chronic vascular remodelling, as this is not well documented.
Topics: Adaptation, Physiological; Arteries; Humans; Physical Conditioning, Human; Physical Endurance; Resistance Training; Vascular Remodeling
PubMed: 25579977
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2014.12.007 -
Journal of Clinical Medicine Jan 2024A growing body of evidence suggests that extrathoracic vascular accesses for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) yield favorable outcomes and can be considered... (Review)
Review
A growing body of evidence suggests that extrathoracic vascular accesses for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) yield favorable outcomes and can be considered as primary alternatives when the gold-standard transfemoral access is contraindicated. Data comparing the transcaval (TCv) to supra-aortic (SAo) approaches (transcarotid, transsubclavian, and transaxillary) for TAVR are lacking. We aimed to compare the outcomes and safety of TCv and SAo accesses for TAVR as alternatives to transfemoral TAVR. A systematic review with meta-analysis was performed by searching PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE databases for all articles comparing TCv-TAVR against SAo-TAVR published until September 2023. Outcomes included in-hospital or 30-day all-cause mortality (ACM) and postoperative complications. A total of three studies with 318 TCv-TAVR and 179 SAo-TAVR patients were included. No statistically significant difference was found regarding in-hospital or 30-day ACM (relative risk [RR] 1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.47-2.34, = 0.91), major bleeding, the need for blood transfusions, major vascular complications, and acute kidney injury. TCv-TAVR was associated with a non-statistically significant lower rate of neurovascular complications (RR 0.39, 95%CI 0.14-1.09, = 0.07). These results suggest that both approaches may be considered as first-line alternatives to transfemoral TAVR, depending on local expertise and patients' anatomy. Additional data from long-term cohort studies are needed.
PubMed: 38256589
DOI: 10.3390/jcm13020455 -
Pediatric Nephrology (Berlin, Germany) Feb 2016Hematuria secondary to renal vein entrapment is mentioned only passing in textbooks and reviews. (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Hematuria secondary to renal vein entrapment is mentioned only passing in textbooks and reviews.
METHODS
We performed a search of the National Library of Medicine database for peer-reviewed publications using the terms "renal vein" or "nutcracker" and "hematuria".
RESULTS
We identified 187 published reports/studies that covered 736 patients, of whom 288 had microscopic hematuria and 448 had macroscopic hematuria. The patient cohort comprised 159 patients aged ≤17 years. Abdominal pain was absent in approximately 65% of all patients, and a clinically relevant left-sided varicocele was observed in 29% of the male patients. A normal pre-aortic left renal vein and an anomalous anatomy were noted in 680 and 56 patients, respectively. The body mass index (BMI) was lower in patients with renal vein entrapment than in the controls, with a regression of hematuria correlating with an increase in BMI. A surgical procedure was attempted in 34% of the patients, of which the most common were endovascular stenting and transposition of the renal vein distally into the vena cava.
CONCLUSIONS
In cases of unexplained hematuria with or without abdominal pain, clinicians should consider the diagnosis of renal vein congestion, especially in males with varicocele. Ultrasonic Doppler flow scanning is the recommended initial diagnostic modality in these patients. Expectation management is advised in the great majority of cases.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Child; Constriction, Pathologic; Female; Hematuria; Humans; Male; Renal Nutcracker Syndrome; Renal Veins; Young Adult
PubMed: 25627663
DOI: 10.1007/s00467-015-3045-2 -
Health Technology Assessment... Jan 2022The management of chronic thoracic aortic aneurysms includes conservative management, watchful waiting, endovascular stent grafting and open surgical replacement. The...
BACKGROUND
The management of chronic thoracic aortic aneurysms includes conservative management, watchful waiting, endovascular stent grafting and open surgical replacement. The Effective Treatments for Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms (ETTAA) study investigates timing and intervention choice.
OBJECTIVE
To describe pre- and post-intervention management of and outcomes for chronic thoracic aortic aneurysms.
DESIGN
A systematic review of intervention effects; a Delphi study of 360 case scenarios based on aneurysm size, location, age, operative risk and connective tissue disorders; and a prospective cohort study of growth, clinical outcomes, costs and quality of life.
SETTING
Thirty NHS vascular/cardiothoracic units.
PARTICIPANTS
Patients aged > 17 years who had existing or new aneurysms of ≥ 4 cm in diameter in the arch, descending or thoracoabdominal aorta.
INTERVENTIONS
Endovascular stent grafting and open surgical replacement.
MAIN OUTCOMES
Pre-intervention aneurysm growth, pre-/post-intervention survival, clinical events, readmissions and quality of life; and descriptive statistics for costs and quality-adjusted life-years over 12 months and value of information using a propensity score-matched subsample.
RESULTS
The review identified five comparative cohort studies (endovascular stent grafting patients, = 3955; open surgical replacement patients, = 21,197). Pooled short-term all-cause mortality favoured endovascular stent grafting (odds ratio 0.71, 95% confidence interval 0.51 to 0.98; no heterogeneity). Data on survival beyond 30 days were mixed. Fewer short-term complications were reported with endovascular stent grafting. The Delphi study included 20 experts (13 centres). For patients with aneurysms of ≤ 6.0 cm in diameter, watchful waiting was preferred. For patients with aneurysms of > 6.0 cm, open surgical replacement was preferred in the arch, except for elderly or high-risk patients, and in the descending aorta if patients had connective tissue disorders. Otherwise endovascular stent grafting was preferred. Between 2014 and 2018, 886 patients were recruited (watchful waiting, = 489; conservative management, = 112; endovascular stent grafting, = 150; open surgical replacement, = 135). Pre-intervention death rate was 8.6% per patient-year; 49.6% of deaths were aneurysm related. Death rates were higher for women (hazard ratio 1.79, 95% confidence interval 1.25 to 2.57; = 0.001) and older patients (age 61-70 years: hazard ratio 2.50, 95% confidence interval 0.76 to 5.43; age 71-80 years: hazard ratio 3.49, 95% confidence interval 1.26 to 9.66; age > 80 years: hazard ratio 7.01, 95% confidence interval 2.50 to 19.62; all compared with age < 60 years, < 0.001) and per 1-cm increase in diameter (hazard ratio 1.90, 95% confidence interval 1.65 to 2.18; = 0.001). The results were similar for aneurysm-related deaths. Decline per year in quality of life was greater for older patients (additional change -0.013 per decade increase in age, 95% confidence interval -0.019 to -0.007; < 0.001) and smokers (additional change for ex-smokers compared with non-smokers 0.003, 95% confidence interval -0.026 to 0.032; additional change for current smokers compared with non-smokers -0.034, 95% confidence interval -0.057 to -0.01; = 0.004). At the time of intervention, endovascular stent grafting patients were older (age difference 7.1 years; 95% confidence interval 4.7 to 9.5 years; < 0.001) and more likely to be smokers (75.8% vs. 66.4%; = 0.080), have valve disease (89.9% vs. 71.6%; < 0.0001), have chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (21.3% vs. 13.3%; = 0.087), be at New York Heart Association stage III/IV (22.3% vs. 16.0%; = 0.217), have lower levels of haemoglobin (difference -6.8 g/l, 95% confidence interval -11.2 to -2.4 g/l; = 0.003) and take statins (69.3% vs. 42.2%; < 0.0001). Ten (6.7%) endovascular stent grafting and 15 (11.1%) open surgical replacement patients died within 30 days of the procedure ( = 0.2107). One-year overall survival was 82.5% (95% confidence interval 75.2% to 87.8%) after endovascular stent grafting and 79.3% (95% confidence interval 71.1% to 85.4%) after open surgical replacement. Variables affecting survival were aneurysm site, age, New York Heart Association stage and time waiting for procedure. For endovascular stent grafting, utility decreased slightly, by -0.017 (95% confidence interval -0.062 to 0.027), in the first 6 weeks. For open surgical replacement, there was a substantial decrease of -0.160 (95% confidence interval -0.199 to -0.121; < 0.001) up to 6 weeks after the procedure. Over 12 months endovascular stent grafting was less costly, with higher quality-adjusted life-years. Formal economic analysis was unfeasible.
LIMITATIONS
The study was limited by small numbers of patients receiving interventions and because only 53% of patients were suitable for both interventions.
CONCLUSIONS
Small (4-6 cm) aneurysms require close observation. Larger (> 6 cm) aneurysms require intervention without delay. Endovascular stent grafting and open surgical replacement were successful for carefully selected patients, but cost comparisons were unfeasible. The choice of intervention is well established, but the timing of intervention remains challenging.
FUTURE WORK
Further research should include an analysis of the risk factors for growth/rupture and long-term outcomes.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN04044627 and NCT02010892.
FUNDING
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Vol. 26, No. 6. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Topics: Adolescent; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic; Child; Cohort Studies; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Endovascular Procedures; Female; Humans; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Quality of Life; Stents
PubMed: 35094747
DOI: 10.3310/ABUT7744 -
Atherosclerosis Apr 2016To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials involving adults, to determine the effect of weight loss induced by energy restriction with or... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
AIM
To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials involving adults, to determine the effect of weight loss induced by energy restriction with or without exercise, anti-obesity drugs or bariatric surgery on measures of arterial stiffness and compliance.
METHODS
A systematic search of Pubmed, EMBASE, MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library was conducted to find intervention trials (randomised/non-randomised) that aimed to achieve weight loss and included the following outcome measures: cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI), direct measures of area/diameter related to pressure change (including β-stiffness index, brachial or carotid artery compliance, aortic, carotid or brachial artery distensibility and strain), measures derived from peripheral pulse wave analysis (including augmentation index, augmentation pressure, distal oscillatory, proximal capacitive and systemic compliance) and pulse pressure. Data were analysed using Comprehensive Meta Analysis V2 using random effects analysis. Standardised mean difference (SMD) is reported with negative values indicating an improvement.
RESULTS
A total of 43 studies, involving 4231 participants, were included in the meta-analysis. Mean weight loss was approximately 11% of initial body weight. Weight loss improved CAVI (SMD -0.48; p = 0.04), β-stiffness index (SMD = -0.98; p = 0.001), arterial compliance (SMD = -0.61; p = 0.0001) and distensibility (SMD -1.10; p = 0.005), distal oscillatory compliance (SMD = -0.41; p = 0.03), proximal capacitive compliance (SMD -0.66; p = 0.009), systemic arterial compliance (SMD -0.71; p = 0.003) and reflection time (SMD -0.51; p = 0.001). Augmentation index, strain, augmentation pressure and pulse pressure were not significantly changed with weight loss.
CONCLUSION
Weight loss induced by energy restriction improves some measures of arterial compliance and stiffness.
Topics: Caloric Restriction; Compliance; Diet, Reducing; Energy Metabolism; Humans; Obesity; Recovery of Function; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome; Vascular Diseases; Vascular Stiffness; Weight Loss
PubMed: 26854971
DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2016.01.042 -
International Journal of Cardiology Nov 2016Proximal aorta stiffens and dilates with aging. Aortic stiffening is a well known process, carrying prognostic implications. On the contrary, few data are available... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Proximal aorta stiffens and dilates with aging. Aortic stiffening is a well known process, carrying prognostic implications. On the contrary, few data are available about proximal aorta dilatation. It is not known if "out of proportion" aortic remodeling, i.e. in excess for age, sex and body size, could be a marker of early vascular ageing; there is controversy on how it would be accelerated by classical risk factors or would associate with validated markers of cardiovascular organ damage.
AIM
We conducted a systematic review in order to evaluate the determinants of proximal aortic dimensions, focusing on the association with arterial hypertension, cardiovascular risk factors and markers of organ damage.
DETERMINANTS OF PROXIMAL AORTA REMODELING
Age, gender and body size explain 40-50% of the variability of aortic dimensions; genetic predisposition accounts for nearly 20%. Among cardiovascular risk factors obesity and hypertension seem to be associated with faster outward aortic remodeling. Arterial hypertension would account for a 0.60-0.78 mm greater diameter at the ascending aorta. Moreover, in hypertension, left ventricular mass showed a strict association with aortic diameter in nearly all studies. Other classical risk factors for atherogenesis such as dyslipidemia and smoking showed a weak influence on proximal aortic dimensions. No study reported a greater aortic remodeling in diabetics.
CONCLUSIONS
"Out of proportion" proximal aortic remodeling, could represent a subclinical marker of early vascular ageing, describing the cumulative influence of genetic predisposition, arterial hypertension and obesity.
Topics: Aging; Aorta, Thoracic; Cardiovascular Diseases; Humans; Organ Size; Risk Factors; Vascular Remodeling; Vascular Stiffness
PubMed: 27591699
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.07.302 -
International Angiology : a Journal of... Feb 2015Obesity is increasingly common among patients diagnosed with vascular disease. This article aims to perform systemic review and meta-analysis on 30-day postoperative... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
AIM
Obesity is increasingly common among patients diagnosed with vascular disease. This article aims to perform systemic review and meta-analysis on 30-day postoperative mortality and complication rate between open (OAR) and endovascular (EVAR) abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in obese patients.
METHODS
A systematic search was performed using the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases to identify original articles on obese (BMI ≥30) patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. Outcomes considered were 30-day mortality and postoperative complication rate following OAR or EVAR. Random-effects Poisson regressions were fitted for each outcome to estimate the risk ratios comparing EVAR to OAR.
RESULTS
Four studies were included in the final analyses, all of which were observational in nature. There was no evidence of publication bias as suggested by funnel plots of the outcomes. Meta-analysis showed statistically significant fewer 30-day postoperative mortality in favour of EVAR (risk ratio 0.34 [95% confidence interval 0.25, 0.48], 4 studies, 2440 patients) and early postoperative complications: myocardial infarction (0.29 [0.13, 0.64]), chest infection (0.21 [0.12, 0.38]), renal failure (0.24 [0.11, 0.51]), wound infection (0.59 [0.48, 0.74]). Risk of postoperative bowel ischemia (0.26 [0.06, 1.13]) and stroke (0.32 [0.07, 1.55]) were equivocal between EVAR and OAR.
CONCLUSION
The current study strongly suggests EVAR is superior to OAR with regards to 30-day mortality and early postoperative outcome in obese patients.
Topics: Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation; Body Mass Index; Endovascular Procedures; Humans; Obesity; Odds Ratio; Postoperative Complications; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 24824839
DOI: No ID Found