-
Sexual Medicine Reviews Jul 2021Although testosterone replacement therapy is an effective treatment for hypogonadism, there are safety concerns regarding potential cardiovascular risks and fertility... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Although testosterone replacement therapy is an effective treatment for hypogonadism, there are safety concerns regarding potential cardiovascular risks and fertility preservation.
OBJECTIVE
To assess the effect of selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM), aromatase inhibitor, and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) on total testosterone (TT) levels and hypogonadism.
METHODS
We performed a systematic literature review from 1987 to 2019 via PubMed, Cochrane review, and Web of Science. Terms used were infertility, hypogonadism, alternative to testosterone therapy, selective estrogen receptor modulator, aromatase inhibitor, and human chorionic gonadotropin. Studies that reported an effect of TT and hypogonadism after treatment of each medication were selected. Hypogonadal symptoms were assessed by the Androgen Deficiency of The Aging Male (ADAM) questionnaire. Aggregated data were analyzed via Chi-squared analysis.
RESULTS
From literature, 25 studies were selected; of which, 12 evaluated efficacy of aromatase inhibitor, 8 evaluated SERMs, and 5 evaluated hCG effects. For SERMs, 512 patients with mean age 42.3 ± 1.94 years showed mean TT before treatment vs after treatment (167.9 ± 202.8 [ng/dl] vs 366.2 ± 32.3 [ng/dl], P < .0001 [180.5-216.1 95% confidence interval {CI}]). For aromatase inhibitor, 375 patients with mean age 54.1 ± 0.67 years showed mean TT before treatment vs after treatment (167.9 ± 202.8 [ng/dl] vs 366.2 ± 32.3 [ng/dl], P < .0001 [180.5-216.1 95% CI]). SERMs also showed ADAM before treatment vs after treatment (4.95 ± 0.28 vs 5.50 ± 0.19, P < .0001 [0.523-0.581 95% CI]). For hCG, 196 patients with mean age 41.7 ± 1.5 years showed mean TT before treatment vs after treatment (284.5 ± 13.6 [ng/dl] vs 565.6 ± 39.7 [ng/dl], P < .0001 [275.2-287.0 95% CI]). In addition, hCG also showed ADAM before treatment vs after treatment (28.1 ± 2.0 vs 30.9 ± 2.3, P < .0001 [2.313 95% CI]).
CONCLUSIONS
Non-testosterone therapies are efficacious in hypogonadal men. Our results show statistically significant improvement in TT and ADAM scores in all 3 medications after treatment. Future studies are warranted to elucidate the relationship between improved hypogonadism and erectile function in the setting of non-testosterone-based treatment. Raheem OA, Chen TT, Le TV, et al. Efficacy of Non-Testosterone-Based Treatment in Hypogonadal Men: A Review. Sex Med Rev 2021;9:381-392.
Topics: Adult; Aromatase Inhibitors; Hormone Replacement Therapy; Humans; Hypogonadism; Male; Middle Aged; Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators; Testosterone
PubMed: 33933392
DOI: 10.1016/j.sxmr.2020.08.003 -
Gynecological Endocrinology : the... Sep 2016Adenomyosis is a heterogeneous gynaecologic condition with a range of clinical presentations, the most common being heavy menstrual bleeding and dysmenorrhoea; however,... (Review)
Review
Adenomyosis is a heterogeneous gynaecologic condition with a range of clinical presentations, the most common being heavy menstrual bleeding and dysmenorrhoea; however, patients can also be asymptomatic. Several studies support the theory that adenomyosis results from invasion of the endometrium into the myometrium, causing alterations in the junctional zone. These changes are commonly seen on imaging studies, such as transvaginal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging. The aim of this review is to discuss the medical approach to the management of adenomyosis symptoms, including pain and abnormal uterine bleeding. The standard treatment of adenomyosis is hysterectomy, but there is no medical therapy to treat the symptoms of adenomyosis while still allowing patients to conceive. Medical therapies using suppressive hormonal treatments, such as continuous use of oral contraceptive pills, high-dose progestins, selective oestrogen receptor modulators, selective progesterone receptor modulators, the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device, aromatase inhibitors, danazol, and gonadotrophin receptor hormone agonists can temporarily induce regression of adenomyosis and improve the symptoms.
Topics: Adenomyosis; Female; Humans
PubMed: 27379972
DOI: 10.1080/09513590.2016.1197200 -
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Jan 2017The benefits of adding ovarian suppression to either tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors as adjuvant breast cancer therapy in premenopausal women are controversial.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
The benefits of adding ovarian suppression to either tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors as adjuvant breast cancer therapy in premenopausal women are controversial. Therefore, we performed a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of relevant randomized trials.
METHODS
We identified and combined four qualifying trials reporting disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) using meta-analysis.
RESULTS
Combining ABCSG-12, SOFT, and TEXT studies, there were 65 fewer DFS events (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.57-1.39) but 30 more deaths for ovarian suppression plus aromatase inhibitor compared to ovarian suppression plus tamoxifen (HR 1.31, 95% CI 0.93-1.84, P = 0.12, τ = 0.03, heterogeneity, P = 0.18). DFS and OS were more concordant for combined SOFT and E-3193 findings; for ovarian suppression plus tamoxifen compared to tamoxifen alone, there were 24 fewer DFS events (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.67-1.07, P = 0.09, τ = 0) and 14 fewer deaths (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.53-1.07). The SOFT Estrogen Substudy demonstrated inconsistent estrogen suppression with combined ovarian suppression and aromatase inhibitor.
CONCLUSION
Given the discordance between DFS and OS and inconsistent estrogen suppression with ovarian suppression plus aromatase inhibitor, adding aromatase inhibitor to ovarian suppression as adjuvant therapy in premenopausal women is premature.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Aromatase Inhibitors; Breast Neoplasms; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Female; Humans; Neoplasm Staging; Odds Ratio; Ovary; Premenopause; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 27785653
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-016-4024-4 -
Hormone and Metabolic Research =... Jun 2021The objective of the study is to determine the risks and benefits of treating idiopathic short stature (ISS) with aromatase inhibitors (AIs). We comprehensively searched... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
The objective of the study is to determine the risks and benefits of treating idiopathic short stature (ISS) with aromatase inhibitors (AIs). We comprehensively searched PubMed, Embase, and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure between establishment year and January 31, 2020. Mean difference (MD)/Standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) of individual studies were pooled using fixed or random effects models. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were also performed. Publication bias was estimated using funnel plots and Egger tests. Fourteen studies including 388 participants were included. The meta-analysis results showed that AIs significantly increased final height (MD=2.46, 95% CI: 0.8-4.12) and predicted adult height (MD=0.34, 95% CI: 0.11-0.57). Changes in bone age (MD=-0.1, 95% CI: -0.86-0.66) and bone mineral density (MD=-0.05, 95% CI: -0.19-0.1) were not different between intervention and control group. AI significantly increased testosterone level (SMD=2.01, 95% CI: 0.8-3.23) and reduced estradiol level (SMD=-1.13, 95% CI: -1.87 to -0.40); The intervention and control group had no significant differences in the levels of high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (SMD=-0.31, 95%CI: -0.68-0.06) and IGF-1 (SMD=0.7, 95% CI: -0.66-2.06) levels. Adverse events were more frequent in the intervention group than in the control group (odds ratio=3.12, 95% CI: 1.44-6.73). In conclusion, both AI monotherapy and AI combination therapy can increase predicted adult height and testosterone levels.
Topics: Aromatase Inhibitors; Body Height; Growth Disorders; Humans; Prognosis; Testosterone
PubMed: 34154030
DOI: 10.1055/a-1492-2841 -
Human Reproduction Update Jan 2020Endometriosis is an estrogen-dependent gynecological disorder that affects at least 10% of women of reproductive age. It may lead to infertility and non-specific... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Endometriosis is an estrogen-dependent gynecological disorder that affects at least 10% of women of reproductive age. It may lead to infertility and non-specific symptoms such as chronic pelvic pain. Endometriosis screening and diagnosis are difficult and time-consuming. Late diagnosis (with a delay ranging from 3.3 to 10.7 years) is a major problem and may contribute to disease progression and a worse response to treatment once initiated. Efficient screening tests might reduce this diagnostic delay. As endometriosis is presumed to be a complex disease with several genetic and non-genetic pathogenic factors, many researchers have sought to identify polymorphisms that predispose to this condition.
OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the most regularly reported polymorphisms in order to identify those that might predispose to endometriosis and might thus be of value in screening.
SEARCH METHODS
The MEDLINE database was searched for English-language publications on DNA polymorphisms in endometriosis, with no date restriction. The PubTator text mining tool was used to extract gene names from the selected publications' abstracts. We only selected polymorphisms reported by at least three studies, having applied strict inclusion and exclusion criteria to their control populations. No stratification based on ethnicity was performed. All steps were carried out according to PRISMA guidelines.
OUTCOMES
The initial selection of 395 publications cited 242 different genes. Sixty-two genes (corresponding to 265 different polymorphisms) were cited at least in three publications. After the application of our other selection criteria (an original case-control study of endometriosis, a reported association between endometriosis and at least one polymorphism, data on women of reproductive age and a diagnosis of endometriosis in the cases established by surgery and/or MRI and confirmed by histology), 28 polymorphisms were eligible for meta-analysis. Only five of the 28 polymorphisms were found to be significantly associated with endometriosis: interferon gamma (IFNG) (CA) repeat, glutathione S-transferase mu 1 (GSTM1) null genotype, glutathione S-transferase pi 1 (GSTP1) rs1695 and wingless-type MMTV integration site family member 4 (WNT4) rs16826658 and rs2235529. Six others showed a significant trend towards an association: progesterone receptor (PGR) PROGINS, interCellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM1) rs1799969, aryl-hydrocarbon receptor repressor (AHRR) rs2292596, cytochrome family 17 subfamily A polypeptide 1 (CYP17A1) rs743572, CYP2C19 rs4244285 and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARG) rs1801282), and 12 showed a significant trend towards the lack of an association: tumor necrosis factor (TNF) rs1799964, interleukin 6 (IL6) rs1800796, transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGFB1) rs1800469, estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) rs2234693, PGR rs10895068, FSH receptor (FSHR) rs6166, ICAM1 rs5498, CYP1A1 rs4646903, CYP19A1 rs10046, tumor protein 53 (TP53) rs1042522, X-ray repair complementing defective repair in Chinese hamster cells 1 (XRCC1) rs25487 and serpin peptidase inhibitor clade E member 1 (SERPINE1) rs1799889; however, for the 18 polymorphisms identified in the latter two groups, further studies of the potential association with the endometriosis risk are needed. The remaining five of the 28 polymorphisms were not associated with endometriosis: glutathione S-transferase theta 1 (GSTT1) null genotype, vascular endothelial growth factor alpha (VEGFA) rs699947, rs833061, rs2010963 and rs3025039.
WIDER IMPLICATIONS
By carefully taking account of how the control populations were defined, we identified polymorphisms that might be candidates for use in endometriosis screening and polymorphisms not associated with endometriosis. This might constitute the first step towards identifying polymorphism combinations that predispose to endometriosis (IFNG (CA) repeat, GSTM1 null genotype, GSTP1 rs1695, WNT4 rs16826658 and WNT4 rs2235529) in a large cohort of patients with well-defined inclusion criteria. In turn, these results might improve the diagnosis of endometriosis in primary care. Lastly, our present findings may enable a better understanding of endometriosis and improve the management of patients with this disease.
Topics: Aromatase; Case-Control Studies; Cytochrome P-450 CYP1A1; Early Diagnosis; Endometriosis; Female; Genetic Predisposition to Disease; Genotype; Glutathione S-Transferase pi; Glutathione Transferase; Humans; Interferon-gamma; Mass Screening; Polymorphism, Genetic; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A; Wnt4 Protein
PubMed: 31821471
DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmz034 -
Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal... Apr 2018In this paper, our aim was to systematically evaluate published evidence of bone fracture risk associated with tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors in women aged 65 and... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
In this paper, our aim was to systematically evaluate published evidence of bone fracture risk associated with tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors in women aged 65 and under, and diagnosed with nonmetastatic breast cancer.
METHODS
We comprehensively searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL databases from January 1997 through May 2015, and reference lists of the selected articles to identify English-language randomized controlled trials and cohort studies of fracture risk. Two independent reviewers screened articles and assessed methodological quality using Risk of Bias assessment for randomized controlled trials and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort studies. Fracture risk was estimated as pooled risk ratios using a random-effects model and inverse variance method.
RESULTS
Of 1926 identified articles, 21 independent studies fulfilled our selection criteria. Similar fracture risk was observed in women treated and not treated with tamoxifen [pooled risk ratio (RR) 0.95; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84-1.07]. A 35% (95% CI 1.21-1.51) higher fracture risk was observed in the aromatase inhibitor group compared with the tamoxifen group. A 17% (95% CI 1.07-1.28) higher fracture risk was observed in the aromatase inhibitor group than the no aromatase inhibitor group. Compared with the tamoxifen group, aromatase inhibitor-associated fracture risk increased by 33% (pooled RR 1.33; 95% CI 1.21-1.47) during the tamoxifen/aromatase inhibitor treatment period, but did not increase (pooled RR 0.99; 95% CI 0.72-1.37) during the post-tamoxifen/aromatase inhibitor treatment period.
CONCLUSIONS
Fracture risk is significantly higher in women treated with aromatase inhibitors, especially during the treatment period. Tamoxifen is not associated with lower fracture risk while tamoxifen could potentially preserve bone mass. Better osteoporosis management programs, especially during the treatment period, are needed for this group of women.
PubMed: 29619093
DOI: 10.1177/1759720X18759291 -
The Breast Journal 2023Third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are the mainstay of treatment in hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer. Even though it is considered to be a... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are the mainstay of treatment in hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer. Even though it is considered to be a well-tolerated therapy, AI-induced musculoskeletal symptoms are common and may be accused for treatment discontinuation. Recently, selective cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors changed the therapeutic setting, and currently, ribociclib, palbociclib, and abemaciclib are all approved in combination with nonsteroidal AIs in patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer. This systematic review aims to identify the frequency of aromatase inhibitor-associated musculoskeletal syndrome (AIMSS) in the adjuvant setting in patients under AI monotherapy compared to patients under combination therapy with AIs and CDK4/6 inhibitors and demonstrate the underlying mechanism of action.
METHODS
This study was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. The literature search and data extraction from all randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were done by two independent investigators. Eligible articles were identified by a search of MEDLINE and ClinicalTrial.gov database concerning the period 2000/01/01-2021/05/01.
RESULTS
Arthralgia was reported in 13.2 to 68.7% of patients receiving AIs for early-stage breast cancer, while arthralgia induced by CDK4/6 inhibitors occurred in a much lower rate [20.5-41.2%]. Bone pain (5-28.7% vs. 2.2-17.2%), back pain (2-13.4% vs. 8-11.2%), and arthritis (3.6-33.6% vs. 0.32%) were reported less frequently in patients receiving the combination of CDK4/6 inhibitors with ET.
CONCLUSIONS
CDK4/6 inhibitors might have a protective effect against joint inflammation and arthralgia occurrence. Further studies are warranted to investigate arthralgia incidence in this population.
Topics: Humans; Female; Aromatase Inhibitors; Breast Neoplasms; Arthralgia; Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4
PubMed: 37293258
DOI: 10.1155/2023/3614296 -
Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology Jul 2023The rapid and continual development of a number of radiopharmaceuticals targeting different receptor, enzyme and small molecule systems has fostered Positron Emission... (Review)
Review
The rapid and continual development of a number of radiopharmaceuticals targeting different receptor, enzyme and small molecule systems has fostered Positron Emission Tomography (PET) imaging of endocrine system actions in vivo in the human brain for several decades. PET radioligands have been developed to measure changes that are regulated by hormone action (e.g., glucose metabolism, cerebral blood flow, dopamine receptors) and actions within endocrine organs or glands such as steroids (e.g., glucocorticoids receptors), hormones (e.g., estrogen, insulin), and enzymes (e.g., aromatase). This systematic review is targeted to the neuroendocrinology community that may be interested in learning about positron emission tomography (PET) imaging for use in their research. Covering neuroendocrine PET research over the past half century, researchers and clinicians will be able to answer the question of where future research may benefit from the strengths of PET imaging.
Topics: Humans; Neuroendocrinology; Positron-Emission Tomography; Radiopharmaceuticals; Brain
PubMed: 37423505
DOI: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2023.101081 -
Current Oncology (Toronto, Ont.) Feb 2023Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is one of the most common comorbidities in breast cancer survivors. Recently, the target population and treatment period for aromatase... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is one of the most common comorbidities in breast cancer survivors. Recently, the target population and treatment period for aromatase inhibitor (AI) treatment in breast cancer patients has been expanding. However, information on adverse CVD events from the long-term use of AI is still lacking. The aim of this study was to investigate the CVD side effects of AI treatment and to evaluate the changes in lipid profile during AI treatment. A systematic search of PubMed (Medline), EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases reporting on cardiovascular outcomes or lipid profiles change in adult female breast cancer patients (>19 years old) with AI was performed. The pooled analysis of 25 studies showed that the prevalence rate of any type of cardiovascular disease was 6.08 per 100 persons (95% CI 2.91-10.31). Angina was the most common type of heart-related cardiovascular event accounting for 3.85 per 100 persons, followed by any type of stroke (3.34) and venous thromboembolism (2.95). Ischemic stroke (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.07-1.81) and myocardial infarction (OR 1.30, 95% CI 0.88-1.93) were more common in AI compared with tamoxifen, whereas the prevalence of venous thromboembolism (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.37-1) was significantly lower in the AI group. In addition, treatment with AI for 6-12 months showed a decrease in HDL-cholesterol and an increase in LDL-cholesterol and total cholesterol. Various CVDs can occur when using AI, and in particular, the risk of MI and ischemic stroke increases in comparison with the adverse effect of tamoxifen. The occurrence of CVD might be related to the deterioration of the lipid profile after AI treatment. Therefore, a customized individualization strategy considering each patient's CV risk factors is needed during AI treatment.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Female; Young Adult; Breast Neoplasms; Aromatase Inhibitors; Cardiovascular Diseases; Venous Thromboembolism; Tamoxifen; Cholesterol; Lipids; Ischemic Stroke
PubMed: 36826103
DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30020142 -
Annals of Oncology : Official Journal... Mar 2017Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) have been associated with cardiovascular disease in adjuvant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing these drugs to tamoxifen. However,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) have been associated with cardiovascular disease in adjuvant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing these drugs to tamoxifen. However, it is unclear whether this risk is real or due to cardioprotective effects of tamoxifen. To address this question, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of all RCTs of AIs and tamoxifen in adjuvant and extended adjuvant setting.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
We searched PubMed, Embase (OVID), Cochrane CENTRAL, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to June 2016 for all RCTs comparing cardiovascular and cerebrovascular safety of AIs to tamoxifen, AIs to placebo or no-treatment, or tamoxifen to placebo or no-treatment in the adjuvant or extended adjuvant setting. Relative risks (RRs) were pooled using DerSimonian and Laird random-effects models with analyses stratified by RCT design.
RESULTS
A total of 19 RCTs were included in the meta-analysis (n = 62 345). In the adjuvant setting, AIs were associated with a 19% (RR: 1.19, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07-1.34) increased risk of cardiovascular events compared with tamoxifen. AIs were not associated with an increased risk compared with placebo in the extended-adjuvant setting (RR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.85-1.20). In the adjuvant setting, tamoxifen was associated with a 33% (RR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.45-0.98) decreased risk compared with placebo or no-treatment. The results from extended adjuvant RCTs comparing tamoxifen to placebo were inconclusive but suggestive of a small protective effect (RR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.77-1.07).
CONCLUSIONS
The increased risk of cardiovascular events with AIs relative to tamoxifen is likely the result of cardioprotective effects of the latter. This new evidence should be considered when assessing the benefits and risks of AIs in the treatment of breast cancer.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Aromatase Inhibitors; Breast Neoplasms; Cardiotoxicity; Female; Humans; Postmenopause; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Tamoxifen
PubMed: 27998966
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw673