-
Autoimmunity Reviews Jul 2023To estimate the diagnostic accuracy of combined cranial and large vessel imaging by PET/CT, ultrasound and MRI for giant cell arteritis (GCA). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES
To estimate the diagnostic accuracy of combined cranial and large vessel imaging by PET/CT, ultrasound and MRI for giant cell arteritis (GCA).
METHODS
PubMed, Embase, Cochrane and Web of Science databases were searched from inception till August 31, 2022. Studies were included if they involved patients with suspected GCA and assessed the diagnostic accuracy of combined cranial and large vessel imaging by PET/CT, ultrasound or MRI with the final clinical diagnosis as reference standard.
RESULTS
Eleven (1578 patients), 3 (149 patients) and 0 studies were included for the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound, PET/CT and MRI, respectively. Combined cranial and large vessel ultrasound had a sensitivity of 86% (76-92%) and specificity of 96% (92-98%). PET/CT of both cranial and large vessels yielded a sensitivity of 82% (61-93%) and specificity of 79% (60-90%). No studies assessed both PET/CT and ultrasound, which precluded head-to-head comparison. Addition of large vessel ultrasound to ultrasound of the temporal arteries (7 studies) significantly increased sensitivity (91% versus 80%, p < 0.001) without decrease in specificity (96% versus 95%, p = 0.57). Evaluating cranial arteries in addition to large vessels on PET/CT (3 studies) tended to increase the sensitivity (82% versus 68%, p = 0.07) without decrease in specificity (81% versus 79%, p = 0.70).
CONCLUSION
Combined cranial and large vessel ultrasound and PET/CT provided excellent accuracy for the diagnosis of GCA. Either PET/CT or ultrasound may be preferred depending on setting, expertise and clinical presentation. The diagnostic accuracy of combined cranial and large vessel MRI needs to be determined in future studies.
Topics: Humans; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography; Giant Cell Arteritis; Fluorodeoxyglucose F18; Temporal Arteries; Magnetic Resonance Imaging
PubMed: 37146926
DOI: 10.1016/j.autrev.2023.103355 -
Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism Feb 2017Previous studies of mortality associated with GCA have shown conflicting results. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the mortality risk in... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Previous studies of mortality associated with GCA have shown conflicting results. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the mortality risk in GCA patients compared to the general population.
METHODS
We searched for published studies indexed in MEDLINE and EMBASE and the Cochrane database from inception to June 18, 2015 using the terms "giant cell arteritis" and "temporal arteritis" combined with the terms for death, mortality, and survival. A manual search of citations from retrieved articles was also performed. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) observational studies of mortality in GCA and (2) comparison of mortality to the general population. Studies published only in abstract form were excluded. Study eligibility and quality (Newcastle-Ottawa scale) were independently assessed by at least two investigators. Random effects meta-analysis of the mortality ratio (MR) was performed by the inverse variance method.
RESULTS
Out of 435 potentially relevant articles, 64 studies were reviewed, 19 studies were included in the review and 17 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Mortality was not increased in GCA patients ascertained from a population base (MR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.96-1.10), but was increased in patients ascertained from a hospital setting (MR = 1.61, 95% CI: 1.19-2.19). There was no difference in MR by gender, and two studies provided evidence that mortality was increased in the early years following diagnosis.
CONCLUSION
At a population level, long-term mortality is not increased in GCA. However, mortality risk may be increased in some patients, and may vary over time.
Topics: Cause of Death; Giant Cell Arteritis; Hospitalization; Humans; Mortality; Risk
PubMed: 28040246
DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2016.08.015 -
Rheumatology (Oxford, England) Nov 2021Takayasu arteritis (TAK) is a rare autoimmune rheumatic disease causing large-vessel vasculitis. Onset is typically between the ages of 20 and 30 years. It is associated... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVES
Takayasu arteritis (TAK) is a rare autoimmune rheumatic disease causing large-vessel vasculitis. Onset is typically between the ages of 20 and 30 years. It is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality, notably due to its effects on the cardiovascular system. It has a poorly understood global epidemiology. Our objective was to systematically review the available evidence in order to calculate the incidence rate of TAK.
METHODS
Three databases (MEDLINE, PubMed and Embase) were searched in November 2019 and the results were screened by two reviewers. A random effects meta-analysis was then conducted in R to calculate the overall incidence rate. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2. The quality of the studies was assessed using an adapted Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Further subgroup analyses were performed by quality, sex, research setting and geographical location. Publication bias was assessed using a Begg's funnel plot.
RESULTS
The incidence rate for TAK was 1.11 per million person-years (95% CI 0.70-1.76). The heterogeneity in the data was extremely high in all analyses, which suggests that there was considerable variation in incidence rates across the different populations studied. TAK was found to be more common in women (incidence rate 2.01 per million person-years, 95% CI 1.39-2.90).
CONCLUSIONS
TAK is an extremely rare disease. It affects women more commonly than men. There is considerable variation in the incidence rate between populations. We suggest that future research should focus on discrete populations in order to better identify genetic and environmental risk factors.
Topics: Global Health; Humans; Incidence; Takayasu Arteritis
PubMed: 33944899
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab406 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Aug 2021Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is the most common form of systemic vasculitis in people older than 50 years of age. It causes granulomatous inflammation of medium- to... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is the most common form of systemic vasculitis in people older than 50 years of age. It causes granulomatous inflammation of medium- to large-sized vessels. Tocilizumab is a recombinant monoclonal antibody directed against interleukin-6 receptors (IL-6R).
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effectiveness and safety of tocilizumab, given alone or with corticosteroids, compared with therapy without tocilizumab for treatment of GCA.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register) (2020, Issue 1); Ovid MEDLINE; Embase.com; PubMed; Latin American and Caribbean Health Science Information database (LILACS); ClinicalTrials.gov; and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). There were no date or language restrictions in the electronic search for trials. We last searched the electronic databases on 3 January 2020.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared tocilizumab of any dosage regimen (alone or with corticosteroids) with therapy without tocilizumab that had a minimum follow-up of six months. Participants were at least 50 years of age, with biopsy-proven GCA or by large-vessel vasculitis by angiography, and met the American College of Rheumatology 1990 guidelines for GCA.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We used standard Cochrane methodology.
MAIN RESULTS
Main results We included two RCTs in the review. The studies were conducted in the USA, Canada, and Europe and enrolled a total of 281 participants with GCA, of whom 74% were women. The mean age of participants was 70 years, with new-onset or relapsing GCA, and fulfilled the 1990 American College of Rheumatology criteria with no uncontrolled comorbidities. Both studies were funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, the manufacturer of tocilizumab. Findings One RCT (30 participants) compared tocilizumab administered every four weeks versus placebo. Point estimates at 12 months and beyond favored tocilizumab over placebo in terms of sustained remission (risk ratio (RR) 4.25, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.21 to 14.88; moderate-certainty evidence). Point estimates suggest no evidence of a difference for all-cause mortality at 12 months or more (RR 0.17, 95% CI 0.01 to 3.94; moderate-certainty evidence). At 12 months, mean time to first relapse after induction of remission was 25 weeks in favor of participants receiving tocilizumab compared to placebo (mean difference (MD) 25, 95% CI 11.4 to 38.6; moderate-certainty evidence). The second RCT (251 participants) randomized participants into two intervention and two comparator groups to receive tocilizumab weekly (100 participants), bi-weekly (49 participants), weekly placebo + 26-week taper (50 participants), or weekly placebo + 52-week taper (51 participants). At 12 months, point estimates from this study on proportion of participants with sustained remission favored participants who received tocilizumab weekly versus placebo + 52-week taper (RR 3.17, 95% CI 1.71 to 5.89; 151 participants); tocilizumab weekly versus placebo + 26-week taper (RR 4.00, 95% CI 1.97 to 8.12; 150 participants); tocilizumab every other week versus placebo + 52-week taper (RR 3.01, 95% CI 1.57 to 5.75; 100 participants); tocilizumab every other week versus placebo + 26-week taper (RR 3.79, 95% CI 1.82 to 7.91; 99 participants) (moderate-certainty evidence). Point estimates on proportion of participants who did not need escape therapy (defined by the study as the inability to keep to the protocol-defined prednisone taper) favored participants who received tocilizumab weekly versus placebo + 52-week taper (RR 1.71, 95% CI 1.24 to 2.35; 151 participants); tocilizumab weekly versus placebo + 26-week taper (RR 2.96, 95% CI 1.83 to 4.78; 150 participants); tocilizumab every other week versus placebo + 52-week taper (RR 1.49, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.14; 100 participants); tocilizumab every other week versus placebo + 26-week taper (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.27 to 1.54; 99 participants) (moderate-certainty evidence). This study did not report mean time to first relapse after induction of remission or all-cause mortality. The same study found no evidence of a difference between groups with regard to vision changes and quality of life, except for the assessment of quality of life with the physical component score of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), which favored weekly tocilizumab versus placebo + 52-week taper (MD 8.17, 95% CI 4.44 to 11.90; moderate-certainty evidence). Adverse events One RCT reported a lower percentage of participants who experienced serious adverse events when receiving tocilizumab every four weeks versus placebo. The second RCT reported no evidence of a difference among groups with regard to adverse events; however, fewer participants reported serious adverse events in the tocilizumab weekly and tocilizumab biweekly interventions compared with the placebo + 26-week taper and placebo + 52-week taper comparators. Investigators in both studies reported that infection was the most frequently reported adverse event.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
This review indicates that tocilizumab therapy may be beneficial in terms of proportion of participants with sustained remission, relapse-free survival, and the need for escape therapy. While the evidence was of moderate certainty, only two studies were included in the review, suggesting that further research is required to corroborate these findings. Future trials should address issues related to the required duration of therapy, patient-reported outcomes such as quality of life and economic outcomes, as well as the clinical outcomes evaluated in this review.
Topics: Aged; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Canada; Female; Giant Cell Arteritis; Humans; Male
PubMed: 34420204
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013484.pub2 -
Eye and Brain 2020Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are novel cancer therapies that may be associated with immune-related adverse events (IRAEs) and come to the attention of... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are novel cancer therapies that may be associated with immune-related adverse events (IRAEs) and come to the attention of neuro-ophthalmologists. This systematic review aims to synthesize the reported ICI-associated IRAEs relevant to neuro-ophthalmologists to help in the diagnosis and management of these conditions.
METHODS
A systematic review of the literature indexed by MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and Web of Science databases was searched from inception to May 2020. Reporting followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Primary studies on ICIs and neuro-ophthalmic complications were included. Outcomes included number of cases and incidence of neuro-ophthalmic IRAEs.
RESULTS
Neuro-ophthalmic complications of ICIs occurred in 0.46% of patients undergoing ICI and may affect the afferent and efferent visual systems. Afferent complications include optic neuritis (12.8%), neuroretinitis (0.9%), and giant cell arteritis (3.7%). Efferent complications include myasthenia gravis (MG) (45.0%), thyroid-like eye disease (11.9%), orbital myositis (13.8%), general myositis with ptosis (7.3%), internuclear ophthalmoplegia (0.9%), opsoclonus-myoclonus-ataxia syndrome (0.9%), and oculomotor nerve palsy (0.9%). Pembrolizumab was the most common causative agent for neuro-ophthalmic complications (32.1%). Mortality was highest for MG (19.8%). Most patients (79.8%) experienced improvement or complete resolution of neuro-ophthalmic symptoms due to cessation of ICI and immunosuppression with systemic corticosteroids.
CONCLUSION
While incidence of neuro-ophthalmic IRAEs is low, clinicians involved in the care of cancer patients must be aware of their presentation to facilitate prompt recognition and management. Collaboration between oncology and neuro-ophthalmology teams is required to effectively manage patients and reduce morbidity and mortality.
PubMed: 33173368
DOI: 10.2147/EB.S277760 -
European Radiology Nov 2023We conducted a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis of publications reporting the ophthalmologic presentation, clinical exam, and orbital MRI... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVES
We conducted a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis of publications reporting the ophthalmologic presentation, clinical exam, and orbital MRI findings in patients with giant cell arteritis and ocular manifestations.
METHODS
PubMed and Cochrane databases were searched up to January 16, 2022. Publications reporting patient-level data on patients with ophthalmologic symptoms, imaged with orbital MRI, and diagnosed with biopsy-proven giant cell arteritis were included. Demographics, clinical symptoms, exam, lab, imaging, and outcomes data were extracted. The methodological quality and completeness of reporting of case reports were assessed.
RESULTS
Thirty-two studies were included comprising 51 patients (females = 24; median age, 76 years). Vision loss (78%) and headache (45%) were commonly reported visual and cranial symptoms. Ophthalmologic presentation was unilateral (41%) or bilateral (59%). Fundus examination most commonly showed disc edema (64%) and pallor (49%). Average visual acuity was very poor (2.28 logMAR ± 2.18). Diagnoses included anterior (61%) and posterior (16%) ischemic optic neuropathy, central retinal artery occlusion (8%), and orbital infarction syndrome (2%). On MRI, enhancement of the optic nerve sheath (53%), intraconal fat (25%), and optic nerve/chiasm (14%) was most prevalent. Among patients with monocular visual symptoms, 38% showed pathologic enhancement in the asymptomatic orbit. Six of seven cases reported imaging resolution after treatment on follow-up MRIs.
CONCLUSIONS
Vision loss, pallid disc edema, and optic nerve sheath enhancement are the most common clinical, fundoscopic, and imaging findings reported in patients diagnosed with giant cell arteritis with ocular manifestations, respectively. MRI may detect subclinical inflammation and ischemia in the asymptomatic eye and may be an adjunct diagnostic tool.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT
Brain and orbital MRIs may have diagnostic and prognostic roles in patients with suspected giant cell arteritis who present with ophthalmic symptoms.
Topics: Female; Humans; Aged; Giant Cell Arteritis; Vision Disorders; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Optic Neuropathy, Ischemic; Edema
PubMed: 37256352
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-09770-2 -
Joint Bone Spine Jan 2023The aim of this study was to estimate the timing of relapse, the prevalence of multiple relapses and the predictors of relapse in patients with giant cell arteritis... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVES
The aim of this study was to estimate the timing of relapse, the prevalence of multiple relapses and the predictors of relapse in patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA).
METHODS
PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched from inception till November, 30 2021. Outcome measures include cumulative relapse rate (CRR) of first relapse at year 1, 2, and 5 after treatment initiation, CRR of second and third relapse and predictors of relapse.
RESULTS
Thirty studies (2595 patients) were included for timing of relapse, 16 studies (1947 patients) for prevalence of multiple relapses and 40 studies (4213 patients) for predictors of relapse. One-year, 2-year and 5-year CRRs were 32% [95% confidence interval (CI) 22-43%], 44% [95% CI 31-59%], and 47% [95% CI 27-67%], respectively. The duration of scheduled glucocorticoid therapy was negatively associated with the 1-year CRR (P=0.03). CRR of second and third relapse were 30% [95% CI 21-40] and 17% [95% CI 8-33%], respectively. Female sex (OR 1.43) and large vessel involvement (OR 2.04) were predictors of relapse.
CONCLUSION
Relapse occurred in almost half of GCA patients mainly during the first two years after diagnosis. One in three patients had multiple relapses. The optimal glucocorticoid tapering schedule, which seeks a balance between the lowest relapse risk and the shortest glucocorticoid duration, needs to be determined in future studies. Longer scheduled glucocorticoid therapy or early introduction of glucocorticoid-sparing agents may be warranted in female patients and patients with large vessel involvement.
Topics: Humans; Female; Glucocorticoids; Giant Cell Arteritis; Chronic Disease; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Recurrence
PubMed: 36410684
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2022.105494 -
Autoimmunity Reviews Feb 2017Anti-endothelial cell antibodies (AECAs) are those that can bind to endothelial cells (ECs) via variable region-specific interactions. The identification and... (Review)
Review
Anti-endothelial cell antibodies (AECAs) are those that can bind to endothelial cells (ECs) via variable region-specific interactions. The identification and quantification of AECAs varies depending on the technique used. The best approach would be to combine at least two different methods. Thus, AECA measurement cannot be considered a diagnostic tool, but the detection and titers of AECAs are associated with disease activity in various systemic vasculitis diseases. AECAs have been described in almost all primary systemic vasculitis diseases but also in many secondary vasculitis diseases, with the identification of various antigens. AECAs may play a pathogenic role in vasculitis, both in vitro and in vivo, mainly via EC activation and induction of apoptosis. We used a systematic review of the literature to better define the prevalence, clinical association, targeted antigens, possible pathophysiologic role and clinical usefulness of AECAs in various types of vasculitis.
Topics: Autoantibodies; Giant Cell Arteritis; Humans; Vasculitis
PubMed: 27989761
DOI: 10.1016/j.autrev.2016.12.012 -
Rheumatology International May 2023Polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) is an inflammatory joint disease in patients over 50 years of age with pain and prolonged morning stiffness in the shoulder and hip girdles...
Polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) is an inflammatory joint disease in patients over 50 years of age with pain and prolonged morning stiffness in the shoulder and hip girdles and neck. The lack of specific clinical findings, laboratory signs, biomarker and established imaging methods makes it difficult to diagnose patients with this disease. The aim of the systematic review is to present the literature data on the use of imaging methods for early diagnosis, assessment of disease activity and therapeutic response in PMR. At the same time, the advantages, disadvantages and contraindications of each method are considered. A literature search was carried out in PubMed and Scopus up to June 2022. Studies were selected that met the following criteria: (1) English language publications in peer-reviewed journals, (2) cohort or case-control studies and a series of more than five clinical cases, (3) studies of newly diagnosed or suspected PMR patients according to classification criteria or expert opinion, (4) imaging evaluation of articular, extraarticular and vascular impairment in PMR. Out of a total of 1431 publications, 61 articles were selected, which differed in the imaging techniques used: radiography (5), scintigraphy (4), magnetic resonance imaging (14), PET/CT (14) and ultrasound (24). Prevalence of extraarticular involvement (tendons, entheses and bursae) was identified in patients with PMR. In a significant number of cases, subclinical vasculitis of the large vessels was found, confirming the common pathogenetic pathways of the two diseases. The diagnostic, therapeutic and prognostic potential of imaging methods in PMR has been relatively poorly studied and remains to be clarified.
Topics: Humans; Middle Aged; Polymyalgia Rheumatica; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography; Giant Cell Arteritis; Pain; Ultrasonography
PubMed: 36853338
DOI: 10.1007/s00296-023-05284-8 -
Immunoglobulin G4-related coronary periarteritis: a systematic literature review with a case series.Clinical Rheumatology Aug 2022We aimed to assess the clinical and radiological characteristics of immunoglobulin G4-related coronary periarteritis through a systematic literature review and from our... (Review)
Review
We aimed to assess the clinical and radiological characteristics of immunoglobulin G4-related coronary periarteritis through a systematic literature review and from our case series. In the systematic literature review, we assessed English language manuscripts on immunoglobulin G4-related coronary periarteritis cases. Additionally, we identified patients with immunoglobulin G4-related coronary periarteritis at St. Luke's International Hospital in Tokyo, Japan, from 2014 to 2020. We summarized patients' demographics, immunoglobulin-G and -G4 titers, site and morphological features of the coronary lesion, and other organ involvements. We identified 38 cases from the literature and four patients from our institute. Coronary lesions were detected using coronary computed tomography in 40 (95.2%) patients. Mass-like or diffuse wall-thickening lesion was the most frequently observed type in 33 (78.6%) patients. No trends at the site of the coronary arteries were identified. Overall, 32 (76.1%) patients had multiple-organ involvement, of which the most common lesion was peri-aortitis in 21 (50.0%) patients. Ten (23.8%) patients with an isolated coronary lesion had significantly lower immunoglobulin-G4 titers than those with other organ involvements (immunoglobulin-G4: 261 [161.0, 564.0] vs. 1355.0 [320.8, 2480.0] mg/dL, p = 0.033). The wall-thickening lesions responded well to immunosuppressive treatments. Mass-like or diffuse wall-thickening on coronary computed tomography is a characteristic radiographic finding of immunoglobulin G4-related coronary periarteritis, which can occur in any branch. Immunoglobulin G4-related coronary periarteritis showed similar characteristics to other organ lesions, including its relatively low serum immunoglobulin-G4 level in patients with a single-organ disease and its high responsiveness to glucocorticoids.
Topics: Aortitis; Arteritis; Coronary Vessels; Heart; Humans; Immunoglobulin G
PubMed: 35445950
DOI: 10.1007/s10067-022-06179-y