-
European Respiratory Review : An... Mar 2023Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a frequent manifestation of connective tissue disease (CTD) with substantial variability in prevalence and outcomes reported across... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a frequent manifestation of connective tissue disease (CTD) with substantial variability in prevalence and outcomes reported across CTD subtypes. This systematic review summarises the prevalence, risk factors and ILD patterns on chest computed tomography of CTD-ILD.
METHODS
A comprehensive search was performed in Medline and Embase to identify eligible studies. Meta-analyses were completed using a random effects model to determine the pooled prevalence of CTD-ILD and ILD patterns.
RESULTS
11 582 unique citations were identified with 237 articles included. Pooled prevalence of ILD was 11% in rheumatoid arthritis (95% CI 7-15%), 47% in systemic sclerosis (44-50%), 41% in idiopathic inflammatory myositis (33-50%), 17% in primary Sjögren's syndrome (12-21%), 56% in mixed connective tissue disease (39-72%) and 6% in systemic lupus erythematosus (3-10%). Usual interstitial pneumonia was the most prevalent ILD pattern in rheumatoid arthritis (pooled prevalence of 46%), while nonspecific interstitial pneumonia was the most common ILD pattern in all other CTD subtypes (pooled prevalence range 27-76%). Across all CTDs with available data, positive serology and higher inflammatory markers were risk factors for development of ILD.
DISCUSSION
We identified substantial variability in ILD across CTD subtypes suggesting that CTD-ILD is too heterogenous to be considered a single entity.
Topics: Humans; Prevalence; Lung Diseases, Interstitial; Connective Tissue Diseases; Risk Factors; Arthritis, Rheumatoid
PubMed: 36889782
DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0210-2022 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2022Modern pharmacological research found that the chemical components of are mainly curcumin and turmeric volatile oil. Several recent randomized controlled trials (RCT)... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Modern pharmacological research found that the chemical components of are mainly curcumin and turmeric volatile oil. Several recent randomized controlled trials (RCT) have shown that curcumin improves symptoms and inflammation in patients with arthritis.
METHODS
Pubmed, Cochran Library, CNKI, and other databases were searched to collect the randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Then, the risk of bias of RCTs were assessed and data of RCTs were extracted. Finally, RevMan 5.3 was utilized for meta-analysis.
RESULTS
Twenty-nine (29) RCTs involving 2396 participants and 5 types of arthritis were included. The arthritis included Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS), Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), Osteoarthritis (OA), Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) and gout/hyperuricemia. Curcumin and Curcuma longa Extract were administered in doses ranging from 120 mg to 1500 mg for a duration of 4-36 weeks. In general, Curcumin and Curcuma longa Extract showed safety in all studies and improved the severity of inflammation and pain levels in these arthritis patients. However, more RCTs are needed in the future to elucidate the effect of Curcumin and Curcuma longa Extract supplementation in patients with arthritis, including RA, OA, AS and JIA.
CONCLUSION
Curcumin and Curcuma longa Extract may improve symptoms and inflammation levels in people with arthritis. However, due to the low quality and small quantity of RCTs, the conclusions need to be interpreted carefully.
Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Curcuma; Curcumin; Humans; Inflammation; Osteoarthritis; Plant Extracts; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Spondylitis, Ankylosing
PubMed: 35935936
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.891822 -
European Review For Medical and... Apr 2019Septic arthritis and osteomyelitis are rare in children, but they are difficult to treat and are associated with a high rate of sequelae. This paper addresses the main...
OBJECTIVE
Septic arthritis and osteomyelitis are rare in children, but they are difficult to treat and are associated with a high rate of sequelae. This paper addresses the main clinical issues related to septic arthritis and osteomyelitis by means of a systematic review of systematic reviews.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The major electronic databases were searched for systematic reviews/meta-analyses septic arthritis and osteomyelitis. The papers that fulfilled the inclusion/exclusion criteria were selected.
RESULTS
There were four systematic reviews on septic arthritis and four on osteomyelitis. Independent assessment of their methodological quality by two reviewers using AMSTAR 2 indicated that its criteria were not consistently followed.
CONCLUSIONS
Collectively, these works provide strong evidence regarding a large number of issues including classification, epidemiology and risk factors, causative organisms, clinical presentation, laboratory markers, imaging, diagnostic needle aspiration, antibiotic therapy, surgical therapy, and prognosis. A clinical summary based on the best evidence is supplied.
Topics: Acute Disease; Arthritis, Infectious; Child; Humans; Osteomyelitis
PubMed: 30977881
DOI: 10.26355/eurrev_201904_17484 -
Journal of Medicinal Food Aug 2016Although turmeric and its curcumin-enriched extracts have been used for treating arthritis, no systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs)... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Although turmeric and its curcumin-enriched extracts have been used for treating arthritis, no systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have been conducted to evaluate the strength of the research. We systemically evaluated all RCTs of turmeric extracts and curcumin for treating arthritis symptoms to elucidate the efficacy of curcuma for alleviating the symptoms of arthritis. Literature searches were conducted using 12 electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Korean databases, Chinese medical databases, and Indian scientific database. Search terms used were "turmeric," "curcuma," "curcumin," "arthritis," and "osteoarthritis." A pain visual analogue score (PVAS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) were used for the major outcomes of arthritis. Initial searches yielded 29 articles, of which 8 met specific selection criteria. Three among the included RCTs reported reduction of PVAS (mean difference: -2.04 [-2.85, -1.24]) with turmeric/curcumin in comparison with placebo (P < .00001), whereas meta-analysis of four studies showed a decrease of WOMAC with turmeric/curcumin treatment (mean difference: -15.36 [-26.9, -3.77]; P = .009). Furthermore, there was no significant mean difference in PVAS between turmeric/curcumin and pain medicine in meta-analysis of five studies. Eight RCTs included in the review exhibited low to moderate risk of bias. There was no publication bias in the meta-analysis. In conclusion, these RCTs provide scientific evidence that supports the efficacy of turmeric extract (about 1000 mg/day of curcumin) in the treatment of arthritis. However, the total number of RCTs included in the analysis, the total sample size, and the methodological quality of the primary studies were not sufficient to draw definitive conclusions. Thus, more rigorous and larger studies are needed to confirm the therapeutic efficacy of turmeric for arthritis.
Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Curcuma; Curcumin; Humans; Osteoarthritis; Pain; Phytotherapy; Plant Extracts; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 27533649
DOI: 10.1089/jmf.2016.3705 -
The Journal of the American Academy of... May 2022Management of Osteoarthritis of the Knee (nonarthroplasty) Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline is based on a systematic review of published studies for the...
Management of Osteoarthritis of the Knee (nonarthroplasty) Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline is based on a systematic review of published studies for the nonarthroplasty treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee in adults (ages 17 years and older). The purpose of this clinical practice guideline is to evaluate current best evidence associated with treatment. The scope of this guideline contains nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic interventions for symptomatic osteoarthritis of the knee, including surgical procedures less invasive than knee arthroplasty. It does not provide recommendations for patients with rheumatoid arthritis, arthritis of other joints, or other imflammatory athropathies. This guideline contains 29 recommendations to assist all qualified and appropriately trained healthcare professionals involved in the nonarthroplasty management of osteoarthritis of the knee and provide information for patients. In addition, the work group highlighted the need for better research into intra-articular corticosteroid, hyaluronic acid, and platelet-rich plasma detailing osteoarthritis characterization, including subgroup analyses and osteoarthrosis severity stratification, and clinically relevant outcomes with control subjects for bias and cost-effectiveness analysis. Studies comparing outcomes in patients with mild-to-moderate knee osteoarthritis and an MRI confirmed meniscal tear who have undergone partial meniscectomy after failing to improve with a course of conservative treatment (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, steroid injection, and physical therapy) versus those who have undergone partial meniscectomy without a dedicated course of conservative treatment. Prospective randomized trials or prospective cohort studies are still needed to establish efficacy of individual oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs within specific subgroups and populations to tailor systemic medications to help increase efficacy and decrease the risk of adverse effects.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Humans; Injections, Intra-Articular; Knee Joint; Meniscectomy; Osteoarthritis, Knee; Prospective Studies
PubMed: 35383651
DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-21-01233 -
International Ophthalmology Feb 2022To provide an overview of the ocular features of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and of the ophthalmic adverse drug reactions (ADRs) that may be associated with the... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
To provide an overview of the ocular features of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and of the ophthalmic adverse drug reactions (ADRs) that may be associated with the administration of antirheumatic drugs.
METHODS
A systematic literature search was performed using the PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases. In addition, a cohort of 489 RA patients who attended the Authors' departments were examined.
RESULTS
Keratoconjunctivitis sicca, episcleritis, scleritis, peripheral ulcerative keratitis (PUK), and anterior uveitis were diagnosed in 29%, 6%, 5%, 2%, and 10%, respectively, of the mentioned cohort. Ocular ADRs to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are rarely reported and include subconjunctival hemorrhages and hemorrhagic retinopathy. In patients taking indomethacin, whorl-like corneal deposits and pigmentary retinopathy have been observed. Glucocorticoids are frequently responsible for posterior subcapsular cataracts and open-angle glaucoma. Methotrexate, the prototype of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), has been associated with the onset of ischemic optic neuropathy, retinal cotton-wool spots, and orbital non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Mild cystoid macular edema and punctate keratitis in patients treated with leflunomide have been occasionally reported. The most frequently occurring ADR of hydroxychloroquine is vortex keratopathy, which may progress to "bull's eye" maculopathy. Patients taking tofacitinib, a synthetic DMARD, more frequently suffer herpes zoster virus (HZV) reactivation, including ophthalmic HZ. Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors have been associated with the paradoxical onset or recurrence of uveitis or sarcoidosis, as well as optic neuritis, demyelinating optic neuropathy, chiasmopathy, and oculomotor palsy. Recurrent episodes of PUK, multiple cotton-wool spots, and retinal hemorrhages have occasionally been reported in patients given tocilizumab, that may also be associated with HZV reactivation, possibly involving the eye. Finally, rituximab, an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, has rarely been associated with necrotizing scleritis, macular edema, and visual impairment.
CONCLUSION
The level of evidence for most of the drug reactions described herein is restricted to the "likely" or "possible" rather than to the "certain" category. However, the lack of biomarkers indicative of the potential risk of ocular ADRs hinders their prevention and emphasizes the need for an accurate risk vs. benefit assessment of these therapies for each patient.
Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Glaucoma, Open-Angle; Humans; Iatrogenic Disease; Rituximab
PubMed: 34802085
DOI: 10.1007/s10792-021-02058-8 -
Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology 2021To summarise the epidemiology, risk and prognostic factors, and treatment landscape of rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD). (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
To summarise the epidemiology, risk and prognostic factors, and treatment landscape of rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD).
METHODS
Targeted and systematic literature reviews were conducted to characterise the epidemiology and treatment landscape associated with RA-ILD, respectively. MEDLINE®, Embase, and CENTRAL were searched via OvidSP in March 2019 and December 2018. The results were narratively summarised.
RESULTS
A total of 24 and 20 publications were captured through targeted and systematic literature review, respectively. No randomised controlled trials were identified; publications were observational cohort studies, cross-sectional, or case-control. Unadjusted incidence of interstitial lung disease (ILD) ranged from 1.3/1,000 person-years for interstitial pneumonia-type ILD to 5.0/1,000 person-years for 'probable or definite ILD'. Prevalence of ILD ranged from 1.8% to 67% (median: 24.9%) and varied with case definition and sample size. Few publications identified the same risk and prognostic factors; age, male sex, duration of disease, and antibodies to cyclic citrullinated peptides were the most frequently reported risk factors for development of RA-ILD, and age was the most common predictor of mortality. Despite identification of a variety of pharmacotherapeutic interventions, assessment of the comparative efficacy and safety of the available treatments were difficult due to heterogenous reporting of outcomes and small sample size.
CONCLUSIONS
A wide range of estimates were identified for incidence and prevalence of RA-ILD. Further, there was no consensus on risk and prognostic factors. Sufficiently powered clinical trials are needed to confirm the findings of the observational studies with respect to efficacy and safety of current treatments.
Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Cross-Sectional Studies; Humans; Lung Diseases, Interstitial; Male; Prognosis; Risk Factors
PubMed: 33635222
DOI: 10.55563/clinexprheumatol/h9tc57 -
European Journal of Neurology Sep 2021Rheumatoid meningitis (RM) is a neurological complication of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Current evidence is based on case reports and partial reviews. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Rheumatoid meningitis (RM) is a neurological complication of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Current evidence is based on case reports and partial reviews.
METHODS
This is a systematic review and meta-analysis following the PRISMA statement. The aim is to describe the characteristics of the disease, including clinical, imaging and laboratory findings, treatment, outcomes and prognosis reported in the literature.
RESULTS
In all, 103 studies with 130 cases were included. RM affected adults with an average age of 62 years, with or without a previous RA diagnosis. RA activity and time with the disease were associated with a worse prognosis. Most common clinical manifestations were transient focal neurological signs (64.6%), systemic symptoms (51.3%), episodic headache (50.4%) and neuropsychiatric alterations (47.7%). Joint manifestations were present in only 27.4% of cases. Brain magnetic resonance imaging showed unilateral or bilateral involvement, predominantly frontoparietal. Both pachymeninges and leptomeninges were affected, the latter more frequently (82.88%). The laboratory findings included increased levels of rheumatoid factor (89.71%), anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (89.47%), C-reactive protein (82.54%) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (81.81%). Cerebrospinal fluid analysis showed an increase in the protein level (76.14%), with pleocytosis (85.19%) of mononuclear predominance (89.19%). Biopsy was performed in 72.52% of the patients. Corticosteroid pulse therapy was the main induction therapy. Disease relapse occurred in 31.17% of patients, whilst 54.54% had a full recovery.
CONCLUSIONS
Rheumatoid meningitis must be considered in adult patients with or without RA diagnosis, high-dose corticosteroid induction therapy should be installed and maintenance therapy plays a key role. It is not recommended to use anti-TNF as an induction therapy. Nowadays, RM has a significantly better outcome. These findings may aid clinicians in timely RM diagnosis and treatment, thus improving its outcomes.
Topics: Adult; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Brain; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Meningitis; Middle Aged; Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors
PubMed: 33966315
DOI: 10.1111/ene.14904 -
Autoimmunity Reviews Sep 2020"Rhupus" or "rhupus syndrome" is a poorly described and underdiagnosed disease in which features of both rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)...
"Rhupus" or "rhupus syndrome" is a poorly described and underdiagnosed disease in which features of both rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) appear in the same patient, most often sequentially. The SLE-related involvement is usually mild, dominated by hematological abnormalities and skin, serosal and renal involvement. The natural history of rhupus arthritis follows an RA-like pattern and can progress towards typical inflammatory erosions, deformations and disability. Despite the lack of consensus on the definition of rhupus and on its place in the spectrum of autoimmunity, a growing number of studies are pointing towards a true overlap between RA and SLE. However, the inclusion criteria employed in the literature during the last 4 decades are heterogeneous, making the already rare cohorts and case reports difficult to analyze. Because of this heterogeneity and due to the rarity of the disease, the prevalence, pathophysiology and natural history as well as the radiological and immunological profiles of rhupus are poorly described. Moreover, since there is no validated therapeutic strategy, treatment is based on clinicians' experience and on the results of a few studies. We herein present a systematic literature review to analyze the clinical and laboratory data of all reported rhupus patients and to provide up-to-date information about recent advances in the understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms, diagnostic tools and treatment options.
Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Humans; Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic; Prevalence; Syndrome
PubMed: 32668290
DOI: 10.1016/j.autrev.2020.102612 -
Deutsches Arzteblatt International Jan 2022Involvement of the temporomandibular joint can be shown in 40-90% of patients with rheumatoid arthritis and juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), although it is often...
BACKGROUND
Involvement of the temporomandibular joint can be shown in 40-90% of patients with rheumatoid arthritis and juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), although it is often asymptomatic. Restricted jaw mobility and jaw pain can be found in approximately 20% of patients with JIA (prevalence: 70 per 100 000 persons). Early diagnosis and treatment of the underlying disease are essential for a good outcome, but uniform, consensus-based management is still lacking.
METHODS
The clinical practice guideline is based on the findings of a systematic literature review in multiple databases and a Delphi procedure to obtain consensus on the recommendations.
RESULTS
Most of the identified studies were retrospective. Patients with JIA should undergo clinical screening with a structured examination protocol once per year in childhood and adolescence, and thereafter as well if the temporomandibular joint is involved. The diagnosis of chronic rheumatoid arthritis of the temporomandibular joint is established with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Conservative treatment (antirheumatic basal therapy, local measures) is unsuccessful in less than 10% of patients. In such cases, arthroscopy and arthrocentesis can be used for temporary symptom relief and functional improvement. Intra-articular corticosteroid injections should be given only once, and only in otherwise intractable cases. In severe cases where all other options have been exhausted (<1%), open surgical treatment can be considered, including alloplastic joint replacement.
CONCLUSION
Oligosymptomatic and asymptomatic cases are common even with radiologic evidence of marked joint damage. The possibility of rheumatic involvement of the temporomandibular joint must be kept in mind so that serious complications can be avoided. Regular clinical evaluation of the temporomandibular joint is recommended, particularly for patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis.
Topics: Adolescent; Arthritis, Juvenile; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Retrospective Studies; Temporomandibular Joint; Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
PubMed: 34874262
DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.m2021.0388