-
International Journal of Cardiology.... Oct 2021The optimal antithrombotic strategy, especially regarding oral anticoagulants (OACs) for atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with bleeding and thrombosis risk after... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
The optimal antithrombotic strategy, especially regarding oral anticoagulants (OACs) for atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with bleeding and thrombosis risk after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), remains unknown. This study explored the optimal oral anticoagulants for AF patients after PCI using a -analysis.
METHODS
Randomised controlled trials were identified from PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library through December 2020. Risk ratios, 95% confidence intervals, and random-effects models were used to compare different antithrombotic strategies through network -analysis, and the combination of antithrombotic agents was ranked according to the surface under the cumulative ranking curve and rankograms. Interval plots were drawn to observe pairwise comparisons between the different strategies.
RESULTS
Five studies of 11,532 patients were included. Factor IIa inhibitor 110 mg bid plus a P2Y12 inhibitor had the greatest advantage for reducing Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) major or minor bleeding; Factor Xa inhibitor plus a P2Y12 inhibitor had the greatest advantage for reducing International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis major bleeding. For patients at risk of stroke plus all-cause death, factor IIa inhibitor 150 mg bid plus a P2Y12 inhibitor should be prioritised, and for those at risk of myocardial infarction and stent thrombosis, vitamin K antagonists plus a P2Y12 inhibitor were preferred.
CONCLUSION
Factor IIa inhibitor 110 mg, factor IIa inhibitor 150 mg, factor Xa inhibitor and vitamin K antagonists should be selected in different situations.
PubMed: 34401468
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2021.100850 -
Heart Asia 2018Cancer antigen-125 (Ca-125) is traditionally recognised as a tumour marker and its role in cardiovascular diseases has been studied only in recent years. Whether Ca-125...
BACKGROUND
Cancer antigen-125 (Ca-125) is traditionally recognised as a tumour marker and its role in cardiovascular diseases has been studied only in recent years. Whether Ca-125 is elevated in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and its levels predict the risk of AF remains controversial. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between Ca-125 levels and AF.
METHODS
PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched until 1 June 2017 for studies that evaluated the association between Ca-125 and AF. Inclusion criteria included studies that compare Ca-125 in patients with and without AF, or those reporting HRs/ORs for risk of AF stratified by Ca-125 levels.
RESULTS
A total of 39 entries were retrieved from the databases, of which 10 studies were included in the final meta-analysis. Ca-125 was significantly higher in patients with AF compared with those in sinus rhythm (mean difference=16 U/mL, 95% CI 2 to 30 U/mL, P<0.05; I: 98%). Ca-125 significantly increased the risk of AF (HR: 1.39, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.82, P<0.05; I: 84%).
CONCLUSION
Ca-125 was significantly higher in patients with AF than in those in sinus rhythm, and high Ca-125 is predictive of AF occurrence. However, the high heterogeneity observed means there is an uncertainty in the relationship between Ca-125 and AF, which needs to be confirmed by larger prospective studies.
PubMed: 29387174
DOI: 10.1136/heartasia-2017-010970 -
Pharmacological Research Jun 2017Direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) were claimed to cause a potential paradigm shift in the therapeutic scenario of patients requiring short- and long-term... (Review)
Review
Direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) were claimed to cause a potential paradigm shift in the therapeutic scenario of patients requiring short- and long-term anticoagulation, by virtue of their pharmacological properties, perceived as innovative. The evidence gathered so far (from pre-approval pivotal trials to real-world post-marketing observational data) consistently confirmed that DOACs are overall comparable to vitamin-K antagonists (VKAs) in terms of safety, efficacy and effectiveness and unequivocally documented a consistent and clinically relevant reduced risk of intracranial bleeding in the settings of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and venous thromboembolism (VTE). Interestingly, two parallel paths can be identified in the current research scenario: A) in the aforementioned consolidated therapeutic indications, an innovative approach is directed towards tailored treatment strategies, to identify patients most likely to benefit from one of the different anticoagulant drugs, in particular subpopulations at increased risk of adverse events (e.g., bleeding); B) in unconventional settings, DOACs are gaining interest for potential use in emerging diseases characterized by arterial and venous thromboembolic risk. In these scenarios, the risk-benefit profile of DOACs, as compared to VKAs or heparins, is less defined. The aim of this review is to critically assess the body of evidence underlying emerging therapeutic uses of DOACs (e.g., heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, anti-phospholipid antibody syndrome), including evolving issues in special populations (e.g., patients with VTE and cancer or cirrhosis). This will be achieved by analyzing the strength (i.e., systematic reviews, randomized clinical trials, observational studies, case report/series) and consistency (i.e., concordance) of both published and unpublished evidence registered in major public repositories.
Topics: Animals; Anticoagulants; Antiphospholipid Syndrome; Evidence-Based Practice; Hemorrhage; Humans; Neoplasms; Thrombocytopenia; Thrombosis
PubMed: 28366835
DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2017.03.026 -
European Journal of Paediatric... Jul 2016Stroke in association with a patent foramen ovale (PFO) may be due to paradoxical embolization via a right to left intracardiac shunt but the exact contribution of PFO... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Stroke in association with a patent foramen ovale (PFO) may be due to paradoxical embolization via a right to left intracardiac shunt but the exact contribution of PFO to stroke or stroke recurrence in childhood remains unclear.
METHODS
To review the relationship of a PFO with stroke, and evaluate associated co-morbidities. An electronic database literature search of Pubmed, Cochrane and EMBASE was performed from January 2000-December 2014.
RESULTS
149 articles were retrieved, with overlap for diagnosis, management, treatment and outcome. 65 reports were utilized for the comprehensive review. Majority of childhood arterial ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attacks are associated with prothrombotic disorders or arteriopathy. Transthoracic echocardiography with a Valsalva maneuver is highly sensitive as a screening tool but may be falsely positive. Transthoracic echocardiography with color Doppler and a concurrent bubble contrast study are excellent for visualizing the atrial septum and PFO and identifying a right to left shunt. Current literature does not support PFO closure for cryptogenic stroke in young adults without an associated risk of thromboembolism.
CONCLUSIONS
High quality research in the pediatric population is lacking and most of the data is extrapolated from adults. Paradoxical embolism from a PFO as a cause of transient ischemic attack or stroke is a diagnosis of exclusion. PFO closure should be individualized based on significant shunting and risk factors such that maximum benefit is derived from the procedure. A young person with a PFO and stroke should be thoroughly investigated to rule out other etiologies.
Topics: Comorbidity; Embolism, Paradoxical; Foramen Ovale, Patent; Humans; Risk Factors; Stroke
PubMed: 27169856
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2016.04.012 -
Current Problems in Cardiology Jun 2023Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) has been established as the treatment of choice for symptomatic aortic stenosis, while it is expanding in all risk-related... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) has been established as the treatment of choice for symptomatic aortic stenosis, while it is expanding in all risk-related group categories of patients, gaining gradually ground over the surgical approach. However, complications and adverse events are yet to be effectively limited and diminished with thrombotic and hemorrhagic events being rooted as a crucial topic of discussion. Favorable anticoagulation pharmacotherapy options are constantly being revised and tested, whilst guidelines are being modified to meet current clinical evidence. This review aims to systematically assess already existing guidelines on anticoagulation in post-TAVI patients and examine novel regimens for the specific use, like apixaban, rivaroxaban, and other anticoagulants, essentially constructing a holistic point of view on future progress on this matter. The added complexity brought by coagulation-affecting comorbidities such as atrial fibrillation, coronary artery disease, and more contributes to the direct association of the topic to the quality of healthcare as a public service. The literature was systematically searched to examine the effectiveness and safety of various anticoagulation treatments and cross-evaluate them based on the according category of patients that were assigned to. Clinical trials, observational studies and systematic reviews were included and, eventually, conclusive remarks and future considerations were developed and presented. In the category of patients without prior indication to anticoagulation, SAPT was proven safer and still effective, when antiplatelet therapies were compared, while a comparison of antiplatelet versus anticoagulation strategies noted the first one, with limited data, as the optimal one. Lastly, direct oral anticoagulants were shown to be safe substitutes for vitamin K antagonists for patients with prior indication to anticoagulation.
Topics: Humans; Thrombosis; Anticoagulants; Hemorrhage; Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Outcome; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
PubMed: 36724817
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2023.101632 -
Medicine Dec 2016Data regarding the clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) receiving dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) and an anticoagulant in addition to DAPT... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis Review
Comparing the clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation receiving dual antiplatelet therapy and patients receiving an addition of an anticoagulant after coronary stent implantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.
BACKGROUND
Data regarding the clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) receiving dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) and an anticoagulant in addition to DAPT (DAPT + vitamin K antagonist [VKA]) after coronary stent implantation are still controversial. Therefore, in order to solve this issue, we aim to compare the adverse clinical outcomes in AF patients receiving DAPT and DAPT + VKA after percutaneous coronary intervention and stenting (PCI-S).
METHODS
Observational studies comparing the adverse clinical outcomes such as major bleeding, major adverse cardiovascular events, stroke, myocardial infarction, all-cause mortality, and stent thrombosis (ST) in AF patients receiving DAPT + VKA therapy, and DAPT after PCI-S have been searched from Medline, EMBASE, and PubMed databases. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to express the pooled effect on discontinuous variables, and the pooled analyses were performed with RevMan 5.3.
RESULTS
Eighteen studies consisting of a total of 20,456 patients with AF (7203 patients received DAPT + VKA and 13,253 patients received DAPT after PCI-S) were included in this meta-analysis. At a mean follow-up period of 15 months, the risk of major bleeding was significantly higher in DAPT + VKA group, with OR 0.62 (95% CI 0.50-0.77, P < 0.0001). There was no significant differences in myocardial infarction and major adverse cardiovascular event between DAPT + VKA and DAPT, with OR 1.27 (95% CI 0.92-1.77, P = 0.15) and OR 1.17 (95% CI 0.99-1.39, P = 0.07), respectively. However, the ST, stroke, and all-cause mortality were significantly lower in the DAPT + VKA group, with OR 1.98 (95% CI 1.03-3.81, P = 0.04), 1.59 (95% CI 1.08-2.34, P = 0.02), and 1.41 (95% CI 1.03-1.94, P = 0.03), respectively.
CONCLUSION
At a mean follow-up period of 15 months, DAPT + VKA was associated with significantly lower risk of stroke, ST, and all-cause mortality in AF patients after PCI-S compared with DAPT group. However, the risk of major bleeding was significantly higher in the DAPT + VKA group.
Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation; Coronary Disease; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Observational Studies as Topic; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Stents; Vitamin K
PubMed: 27977592
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005581 -
Hellenic Journal of Cardiology : HJC =... 2023Atrial fibrillation (AF) and cancer often co-exist. Each has been associated with an increased risk of morbidity and mortality. The aim of this meta-analysis was to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
AIMS
Atrial fibrillation (AF) and cancer often co-exist. Each has been associated with an increased risk of morbidity and mortality. The aim of this meta-analysis was to synthesize available data regarding the incidence of arterial thromboembolism (TE), bleeding, and all-cause mortality in patients with AF with or without cancer.
METHODS
Literature search was conducted in PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, WebOfScience, Scopus, CENTRAL, OpenGrey, and EThOS databases to identify studies that included patients with AF and accounted for cancer status with the incidence of TE (ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, or arterial thrombosis), major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding, and all-cause mortality. A random-effects meta-analysis was used.
RESULTS
Overall, 17 studies were included (3,149,547 patients). The risk of TE was similar in patients with AF with comorbid cancer compared with that in AF alone (pooled odds ratio [pOR] 0.97, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.85-1.11, I = 87%). Major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding (pOR 1.65, 95% CI 1.35-2.02, I = 98%) and all-cause death (pOR 2.17, 95% CI 1.83-2.56, I = 98%) were significantly higher in patients with AF with cancer than in patients with AF only. The history of TE and hypertension and mean age were significant moderators of TE risk.
CONCLUSION
In patients with AF, the presence of cancer is associated with a similar risk of TE as well as an increased risk of bleeding and all-cause death compared with the absence of cancer.
Topics: Humans; Atrial Fibrillation; Stroke; Anticoagulants; Hemorrhage; Thromboembolism; Neoplasms; Risk Factors
PubMed: 37414144
DOI: 10.1016/j.hjc.2023.06.005 -
The Canadian Journal of Cardiology Mar 2018Intracardiac thrombi arising in the left atrial appendage (LAA) are the principal cause of stroke in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF). Predicting the presence of LAA... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Intracardiac thrombi arising in the left atrial appendage (LAA) are the principal cause of stroke in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF). Predicting the presence of LAA thrombi is of vital importance in stratifying patients that would need further LAA imaging prior to cardioversion or AF ablation.
METHODS
We comprehensively searched PubMed from its inception to November 2017 for randomized controlled trials, cohort and case control studies, as well as for case series on LAA thrombi risk factors, imaging, prevention, and anticoagulation management in atrial fibrillation.
RESULTS
A systematic review of the literature identified 106 articles that investigated the presence of LAA thrombi in AF patients. We classified the articles according to topic and reported on: (1) risk factors; (2) diagnostic imaging modalities; (3) prevention strategies before cardioversion; (4) prevention strategies before AF ablation; and (5) management of detected LAA thrombi.
CONCLUSIONS
Integration of clinical, biomarker, and imaging risk factors can improve overall prediction for the presence of LAA thrombi, translating into improved patient selection for imaging. The gold standard for the diagnosis of LAA thrombi remains transesophageal echocardiography, although intracardiac ultrasound, cardiac computed tomography, and cardiovascular magnetic imaging are promising alternative modalities. When LAA thrombi are discovered, the treatment regimen remains variable, although direct oral anticoagulants might have efficacy similar to vitamin K antagonists. Future trials will help further elucidate direct oral anticoagulant use for the treatment of LAA thrombi.
Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Appendage; Atrial Fibrillation; Catheter Ablation; Echocardiography, Transesophageal; Electric Countershock; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prognosis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Survival Rate; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 29395705
DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2017.12.008 -
Stroke Apr 2017This study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban in real-world practice compared with effectiveness and safety of dabigatran or warfarin... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
This study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban in real-world practice compared with effectiveness and safety of dabigatran or warfarin for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation through meta-analyzing observational studies.
METHODS
Seventeen studies were included after searching in PubMed for studies reporting the comparative effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban versus dabigatran (n=3), rivaroxaban versus Warfarin (n=11), or both (n=3) for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.
RESULTS
Overall, the risks of stroke/systematic thromboembolism with rivaroxaban were similar when compared with those with dabigatran (stroke/thromboembolism: hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.91-1.13; I=70.2%, N=5), but were significantly reduced when compared with those with warfarin (hazard ratio, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-0.85; I=45.1%, N=9). Major bleeding risk was significantly higher with rivaroxaban than with dabigatran (hazard ratio, 1.38; 95% confidence interval, 1.27-1.49; I=26.1%, N=5), but similar to that with warfarin (hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.91-1.07; I=0.0%, N=6). Rivaroxaban was associated with increased all-cause mortality and gastrointestinal bleeding, but similar risk of acute myocardial infarction and intracranial hemorrhage when compared with dabigatran. When compared with warfarin, rivaroxaban was associated with similar risk of any bleeding, mortality, and acute myocardial infarction, but a higher risk of gastrointestinal bleeding and lower risk of intracranial hemorrhage.
CONCLUSIONS
In this systematic review and meta-analysis, rivaroxaban was as effective as dabigatran, but was more effective than warfarin for the prevention of stroke/thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation patients. Major bleeding risk was significantly higher with rivaroxaban than with dabigatran, as was all-cause mortality and gastrointestinal bleeding. Rivaroxaban was comparable to warfarin for major bleeding, with an increased risk in gastrointestinal bleeding and decreased risk of intracranial hemorrhage.
Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Intracranial Embolism; Intracranial Thrombosis; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin
PubMed: 28213573
DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.016275 -
Clinical Therapeutics Jul 2017The findings from the observational studies comparing the effectiveness and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) versus vitamin K antagonists... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
The findings from the observational studies comparing the effectiveness and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for atrial fibrillation (AF) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) are inconsistent. We conducted separate meta-analyses examining the efficacy/effectiveness and safety of NOACs versus VKAs by disease (AF vs VTE), study design (randomized controlled trials [RCTs] vs observational studies), and NOAC (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban).
METHODS
The main data sources included PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Scopus from January 1, 2005, to February 15, 2016. We searched for Phase III RCTs and observational studies comparing NOACs versus VKAs. The primary outcomes were stroke/systemic embolism (SE) for AF; recurrent VTE/fatal pulmonary embolism (PE) for VTE; and major bleeding for both conditions. Secondary outcomes included stroke and myocardial infarction (MI) for AF, recurrent deep vein thrombosis (DVT)/PE for VTE, and mortality, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and gastrointestinal bleeding for both conditions. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) were reported by using inverse variance-weighted random effects models.
FINDINGS
A total of 13 RCTs and 27 observational studies (AF, n = 32; VTE, n = 8) were included. For AF, dabigatran and VKAs were comparable for stroke/SE risk in 1 RCT (HR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.57-1.03]) and 6 observational studies (HR, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.83-1.27]). Rivaroxaban had a 20% decreased risk of stroke/SE in 3 RCTs (HR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.67-0.95]) compared with VKA, but the effect was nonsignificant in 3 observational studies (HR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.59-1.04]). Apixaban decreased stroke/systemic embolism risk (HR, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.66-0.95]) compared with VKA in 1 RCT, but edoxaban was comparable to VKA (HR, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.77-1.28]) in 1 RCT (no observational studies available for apixaban/edoxaban). Dabigatran, apixaban, and edoxaban decreased the risk of hemorrhagic stroke, mortality, major bleeding, and ICH by 10% to 71% compared with VKAs but not rivaroxaban. For VTE, NOACs and VKAs were comparable for recurrent VTE/fatal PE/DVT/PE risk in 7 RCTs and 1 observational study. The 7 RCTs demonstrated a 32% to 69% decreased risk of major bleeding for dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban compared with VKAs. No difference was shown in 1 rivaroxaban observational study (HR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.40-1.49]) and 1 edoxaban RCT (HR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.59-1.20]). Except for dabigatran, the NOACs had a 61% to 86% decreased risk of ICH and gastrointestinal bleeding.
IMPLICATIONS
Overall, NOACs were comparable or superior to VKAs. Although no observational studies are currently available for apixaban/edoxaban, a few notable inconsistencies exist for dabigatran (ischemic stroke, MI) and rivaroxaban (stroke/SE, major bleeding in VTE) between RCTs and observational studies. Individualizing NOAC/VKA therapy based on benefit/safety profiles and patient characteristics is suggested.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Observational Studies as Topic; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism; Vitamin K
PubMed: 28668628
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.05.358