-
Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism &... Sep 2018BSTRACT Introduction: The aim of this study was to investigate the potential role of melatonin in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nephrotoxicity at the... (Review)
Review
BSTRACT Introduction: The aim of this study was to investigate the potential role of melatonin in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nephrotoxicity at the preclinical level. Areas to be covered: To illuminate the possible role of melatonin in preventing chemotherapy-related nephrotoxicity, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline was followed. A comprehensive search strategy was developed to include PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase electronic databases from their inception to May 2018. Based on a set of prespecified inclusion and exclusion criteria, 21 non-clinical articles were ultimately included in the study. Expert opinion: Our findings clearly demonstrate that melatonin has a protective role in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nephrotoxicity which may be caused by different chemotherapy agents such as cyclophosphamide, cisplatin, doxorubicin, methotrexate, oxaliplatin, etoposide, and daunorubicin. On the basis of current review of non-clinical studies, this protective effect of melatonin is attributed to different mechanisms such as reduction of oxidative stress, apoptosis, and inflammation. The findings presented in this review are based on non-clinical studies and thus conducting appropriate clinical trials to evaluate the real effectiveness of the concurrent use of chemotherapy agents with melatonin in the cancer patients is necessary.
Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Apoptosis; Humans; Inflammation; Kidney Diseases; Melatonin; Neoplasms; Oxidative Stress
PubMed: 30118646
DOI: 10.1080/17425255.2018.1513492 -
European Journal of Surgical Oncology :... Dec 2023PIPAC consists in delivering normothermic chemotherapy solution directly into the peritoneal cavity as an aerosol under pressure. Currently PIPAC is considered as a... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
PIPAC consists in delivering normothermic chemotherapy solution directly into the peritoneal cavity as an aerosol under pressure. Currently PIPAC is considered as a palliative treatment for patients suffering from non-resectable peritoneal carcinomatosis. We performed a SR to assess tolerance and response of this novel method among patient with OC.
METHODS
We searched electronic database PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Clinical Trials.gov. We only included clinical studies reporting PIPAC with cisplatin and doxorubicin in patients with ovarian cancer.
RESULTS
This systematic review included 4 studies. In 3 studies all patients were pretreated with cytoreductive surgery, in 1 study surgery was performed in 8/34 (23 %) patients. Mean PCI at first PIPAC procedure ranged from 16.3 to 19.6. All studies reported the proportion of patients with ascites at the first PIPAC with a pooled rate of 48,3 %. Pooled rate of CTCAE Grade 3 toxicity calculated on the total number of PIPAC was 6 % and Grade 4 was 0.9 %. One study reported two cases of small bowel perforation related or potentially related to PIPAC. On study reported a cumulative survival after 400 days of 62 % and a mean actuarial survival time of all patients who underwent PIPAC of 442 days. In another study the mean time to progression was 144 days (95 % CI 122-168 days).
CONCLUSION
This systematic review demonstrated that PIPAC with cisplatin and doxorubicin appear to have a good safety profile with low toxicity and encouraging trend in terms of overall survival.
Topics: Humans; Female; Cisplatin; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Ovarian Neoplasms; Doxorubicin; Aerosols
PubMed: 37951158
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.107250 -
Drug Development Research Aug 2023This study aims to assess studies on circular RNAs (circRNAs) in the chemoresistance of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and provide relevant references for the... (Review)
Review
This study aims to assess studies on circular RNAs (circRNAs) in the chemoresistance of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and provide relevant references for the development of new TNBC chemotherapy sensitivity biomarkers and therapeutic targets. The PubMed, Embase, Web of Knowledge, Cochrane Library, and four Chinese databases were searched up to January 27, 2023, and studies related to TNBC chemoresistance were included. The basic characteristics of the studies and the mechanisms of circRNAs in regulating TNBC chemoresistance were analyzed. A total of 28 studies published between 2018 and 2023 were included, and the chemotherapeutics included adriamycin, paclitaxel, docetaxel, 5-fluorouracil, lapatinib, and so forth. A total of 30 circRNAs were identified, 86.67% (n = 26) of these circRNAs were reported to act as microRNA (miRNA) sponges to regulate chemotherapy sensitivity, while only two circRNAs (circRNA-MTO1 and circRNA-CREIT) interacted with proteins. A total of 14, 12, and 2 circRNAs were reported to be associated with chemoresistance to adriamycin, taxanes, and 5-fluorouracil, respectively. Six circRNAs were found to act as miRNA sponges that promote chemotherapy resistance by regulating the PI3K/Akt signalling pathway. CircRNAs participate in the regulation of TNBC chemoresistance and can be used as biomarkers and therapeutic targets for improving chemotherapy sensitivity. However, further studies are needed to confirm the role of circRNAs in TNBC chemoresistance.
Topics: Humans; RNA, Circular; Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases; MicroRNAs; Biomarkers; Doxorubicin; Fluorouracil; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic
PubMed: 37114737
DOI: 10.1002/ddr.22069 -
Health Technology Assessment... Jan 2015Ovarian cancer is the fifth most common cancer in the UK, and the fourth most common cause of cancer death. Of those people successfully treated with first-line... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis Review
Topotecan, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin hydrochloride, paclitaxel, trabectedin and gemcitabine for advanced recurrent or refractory ovarian cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
BACKGROUND
Ovarian cancer is the fifth most common cancer in the UK, and the fourth most common cause of cancer death. Of those people successfully treated with first-line chemotherapy, 55-75% will relapse within 2 years. At this time, it is uncertain which chemotherapy regimen is more clinically effective and cost-effective for the treatment of recurrent, advanced ovarian cancer.
OBJECTIVES
To determine the comparative clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan (Hycamtin(®), GlaxoSmithKline), pegylated liposomal doxorubicin hydrochloride (PLDH; Caelyx(®), Schering-Plough), paclitaxel (Taxol(®), Bristol-Myers Squibb), trabectedin (Yondelis(®), PharmaMar) and gemcitabine (Gemzar(®), Eli Lilly and Company) for the treatment of advanced, recurrent ovarian cancer.
DATA SOURCES
Electronic databases (MEDLINE(®), EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Health Technology Assessment database, NHS Economic Evaluations Database) and trial registries were searched, and company submissions were reviewed. Databases were searched from inception to May 2013.
METHODS
A systematic review of the clinical and economic literature was carried out following standard methodological principles. Double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trials, evaluating topotecan, PLDH, paclitaxel, trabectedin and gemcitabine, and economic evaluations were included. A network meta-analysis (NMA) was carried out. A de novo economic model was developed.
RESULTS
For most outcomes measuring clinical response, two networks were constructed: one evaluating platinum-based regimens and one evaluating non-platinum-based regimens. In people with platinum-sensitive disease, NMA found statistically significant benefits for PLDH plus platinum, and paclitaxel plus platinum for overall survival (OS) compared with platinum monotherapy. PLDH plus platinum significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) compared with paclitaxel plus platinum. Of the non-platinum-based treatments, PLDH monotherapy and trabectedin plus PLDH were found to significantly increase OS, but not PFS, compared with topotecan monotherapy. In people with platinum-resistant/-refractory (PRR) disease, NMA found no statistically significant differences for any treatment compared with alternative regimens in OS and PFS. Economic modelling indicated that, for people with platinum-sensitive disease and receiving platinum-based therapy, the estimated probabilistic incremental cost-effectiveness ratio [ICER; incremental cost per additional quality-adjusted life-year (QALY)] for paclitaxel plus platinum compared with platinum was £24,539. Gemcitabine plus carboplatin was extendedly dominated, and PLDH plus platinum was strictly dominated. For people with platinum-sensitive disease and receiving non-platinum-based therapy, the probabilistic ICERs associated with PLDH compared with paclitaxel, and trabectedin plus PLDH compared with PLDH, were estimated to be £25,931 and £81,353, respectively. Topotecan was strictly dominated. For people with PRR disease, the probabilistic ICER associated with topotecan compared with PLDH was estimated to be £324,188. Paclitaxel was strictly dominated.
LIMITATIONS
As platinum- and non-platinum-based treatments were evaluated separately, the comparative clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of these regimens is uncertain in patients with platinum-sensitive disease.
CONCLUSIONS
For platinum-sensitive disease, it was not possible to compare the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of platinum-based therapies with non-platinum-based therapies. For people with platinum-sensitive disease and treated with platinum-based therapies, paclitaxel plus platinum could be considered cost-effective compared with platinum at a threshold of £30,000 per additional QALY. For people with platinum-sensitive disease and treated with non-platinum-based therapies, it is unclear whether PLDH would be considered cost-effective compared with paclitaxel at a threshold of £30,000 per additional QALY; trabectedin plus PLDH is unlikely to be considered cost-effective compared with PLDH. For patients with PRR disease, it is unlikely that topotecan would be considered cost-effective compared with PLDH. Randomised controlled trials comparing platinum with non-platinum-based treatments might help to verify the comparative effectiveness of these regimens.
STUDY REGISTRATION
This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42013003555.
FUNDING
The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Deoxycytidine; Dioxoles; Disease-Free Survival; Double-Blind Method; Doxorubicin; Female; Health Care Costs; Humans; Neoplasm Invasiveness; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Neoplasm Staging; Ovarian Neoplasms; Paclitaxel; Polyethylene Glycols; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Survival Analysis; Tetrahydroisoquinolines; Topotecan; Trabectedin; Treatment Outcome; United Kingdom; Gemcitabine
PubMed: 25626481
DOI: 10.3310/hta19070 -
Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology Mar 2019Induction chemotherapy based on anthracyclines and cytarabine (Ara-C) combination remains the standard of care for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients who are...
Induction chemotherapy based on anthracyclines and cytarabine (Ara-C) combination remains the standard of care for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients who are considered candidate for intensive and curative approaches. However, the toxicity of this regimen is high, with disappointing clinical outcomes among the so-called poor-prognosis AML subsets, which generally refer to patients with adverse cytogenetic risk, secondary AML including therapy-related AML, poor-prognosis mutations, especially FLT3-ITD, and relapse/refractory AML. Areas covered: To the best of our knowledge, the role and efficacy of 7 + 3 schedules containing daunorubicin (DNR) and Ara-C for certain types of poor-prognosis AML has not been systematically assessed. A critical approach to the role of DNR and Ara-C induction could be relevant to establish which patients should be enrolled in clinical trials using novel therapies. Expert commentary: In this regard, a recent randomized clinical trial (RCT) showed improved results in older patients with sAML or high-risk cytogenetics who received CPX-351 compared with standard 7 + 3 combination. We perform a systematic literature review to analyze the clinical outcomes reported with DNR plus Ara-C regimens in adult patients with poor-prognosis AML, the use of liposomal formulations of DNR and Ara-C and the RCTs which compared standard 7 + 3 with the addition of a third drug.
Topics: Adult; Animals; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Cytarabine; Cytogenetic Analysis; Daunorubicin; Drug Administration Schedule; Humans; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute; Mutation; Prognosis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 30672340
DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2019.1573668 -
European Journal of Clinical... Nov 2023This study aimed to systematically review and critically appraise cost-effectiveness studies on Brentuximab vedotin (BV) in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
This study aimed to systematically review and critically appraise cost-effectiveness studies on Brentuximab vedotin (BV) in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL).
METHODS
The PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science core collection, and Embase databases were searched until July 3, 2022. We included published full economic evaluation studies on BV for treating patients with HL. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the Quality of Health Economic Studies (QHES) checklist. Meanwhile, we used qualitative synthesis to analyze the findings. We converted the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) to the value of the US dollar in 2022.
RESULTS
Eight economic evaluations met the study's inclusion criteria. The results of three studies that compared BV plus doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (BV + AVD) front-line therapy with doxorubicin, bleomycin, vincristine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) showed that BV is unlikely to be cost-effective as a front-line treatment in patients advanced stage (III or IV) HL. Four studies investigated the cost-effectiveness of BV in patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) HL after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). BV was not cost-effective in the reviewed studies at accepted thresholds. In addition, the adjusted ICERs ranged from $65,382 to $374,896 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). The key drivers of cost-effectiveness were medication costs, hazard ratio for BV, and utilities.
CONCLUSION
Available economic evaluations show that using BV as front-line treatment or consolidation therapy is not cost-effective based on specific ICER thresholds for patients with HL or R/R HL. To decide on this orphan drug, we should consider other factors such as existence of alternative treatment options, clinical benefits, and disease burden.
Topics: Humans; Hodgkin Disease; Brentuximab Vedotin; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Doxorubicin; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bleomycin; Vinblastine; Dacarbazine; Transplantation, Autologous
PubMed: 37656182
DOI: 10.1007/s00228-023-03557-6 -
Cardiology in Review 2018Doxorubicin is an important cause of chemotherapy-induced cardiomyopathy. Prior studies have found conflicting results of whether nonstrain diastolic parameters can... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Doxorubicin is an important cause of chemotherapy-induced cardiomyopathy. Prior studies have found conflicting results of whether nonstrain diastolic parameters can predict doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity. We performed a systematic review of English written publications using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The following inclusion criteria were applied: cancer subjects, echo-derived nonstrain diastolic profile, and patients compared before and after treatment to predict systolic dysfunction. The following exclusion criteria were applied: other cardiotoxic agents, non-echo studies, or used protective medications. Meta-analysis was performed using comprehensive meta-analysis software V3 to calculate cumulative means, SD, and odds ratios (ORs). Only 4 studies were designed to predict doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity. Of the 7 common parameters identified among studies, only 4 were significant: mitral E [OR: 3.4; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.5-7.8; P = 0.003]; lateral E' (OR: 3.7; 95% CI: 1.5-9.4; P < 0.005); mitral E/A (OR: 4.3; 95% CI: 2.1-8.9; P < 0.0001); and lateral S' (OR: 2.7; 95% CI: 1.2-5.8; P = 0.01). We found that conventional nonstrain diastolic parameters predicted doxorubicin-induced systolic dysfunction. Whether nonstrain diastolic parameters can be used to supplement strain imaging for predicting doxorubicin-induced systolic function warrants further investigation in larger studies.
Topics: Antibiotics, Antineoplastic; Cardiomyopathies; Diastole; Doxorubicin; Echocardiography; Heart Ventricles; Humans; Neoplasms; Prognosis; Stroke Volume
PubMed: 29045286
DOI: 10.1097/CRD.0000000000000161 -
Cancer Treatment Reviews Feb 2018Despite a lack of improvement in overall survival (OS) with doxorubicin-based combinations over doxorubicin alone in advanced STS, the role of multi-agent chemotherapy... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Despite a lack of improvement in overall survival (OS) with doxorubicin-based combinations over doxorubicin alone in advanced STS, the role of multi-agent chemotherapy remains poorly defined.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate benefits and harms of multi-agent chemotherapy in advanced STS. Eligible studies were randomized trials of chemotherapy in advanced STS comparing single agent to multi-agent therapy. Data from studies reporting a hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for OS and progression-free survival (PFS) were pooled in a meta-analysis. Meta-regression was utilized to explore the association between efficacy (OS and PFS) and both toxicity and dose intensity.
RESULTS
We identified 22 trials published between 1974 and April 2016 and comprising 5044 patients. Overall, multi-agent chemotherapy was associated with improved OS (HR:0.79, p = 0.02), and borderline improvement in PFS (HR:0.86, p = 0.05). While the effect on OS was similar in trials with non-anthracycline controls compared to those with anthracycline controls (HR for OS 0.73 vs. 0.82, p for difference = 0.63) there was a non-significantly greater effect for multi-agent chemotherapy on PFS in non-anthracycline RCT (HR for PFS 0.73 vs. 0.91, p for difference = 0.13). Compared to studies with cytotoxic therapy-based multi-agent therapy, a non-significantly greater magnitude of effect among studies with biological/cytostatic experimental groups was seen (HR for OS 0.64 vs. 0.86, p for difference = 0.37). There was a borderline significant association between dose reductions (which were more common in combination arms) and worse PFS (beta = 0.70, p = 0.053).
CONCLUSION
Multi-agent chemotherapy is associated with a modest, but statistically significant improvement in outcomes in STS. Combining chemotherapy with non-cytotoxic agents might represent a promising strategy.
Topics: Anthracyclines; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Disease-Free Survival; Doxorubicin; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sarcoma
PubMed: 29253836
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2017.12.003 -
Critical Reviews in Oncology/hematology Jun 2016Docetaxel or Epirubicin-based regimens are both approved for the treatment of metastatic gastric cancer. We perform a systemic review with metanalysis to evaluate the... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis Review
Docetaxel or Epirubicin-based regimens are both approved for the treatment of metastatic gastric cancer. We perform a systemic review with metanalysis to evaluate the efficacy and toxicities of docetaxel-based chemotherapy compared with epirubicin-containing regimens. A metaanalysis of randomized studies in accordance with the preference guidelines for reported items in systematic reviews and meta-analyses is performed in which the databases of PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and the ASCO University Meeting were searched for relevant publications. The primary outcome was efficacy, the secondary toxicities. A total of 553 cases were included in the meta-analysis; 278 received epirubicin-based treatment and 313 received docetaxel. The pooled risk ratio to achieve an objective response and a disease control rate were 1.08 (95% CI 0.85-1.37; P=0.52) and 0.90 (95% CI 0.75-1.08; P=0.27) respectively. EPI arm showed a decrease in the risk of neutropenia, anemia, fatigue, asthenia and diarrhea, paraesthesia; docetaxel arm showed a decrease in the risk of leucopenia, thrombocytopenia, anorexia, nausea, nausea-vomiting, stomatitis and neutropenic fever. The results of our study suggest a similar activity of docetaxel and epirubicin-based chemotherapeutic regimens in metastatic gastric cancer. Other parameters as, comorbidity, concomitant diseases and prior therapies should be taken into account to address the clinician's choice in selecting the best therapeutical approach for any single patient.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Docetaxel; Epirubicin; Humans; Neoplasm Staging; Stomach Neoplasms; Taxoids; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 27083592
DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2016.04.001 -
Future Oncology (London, England) Feb 2022To understand the burden of treatment-naive peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL). A systematic literature review was conducted in November 2020 following best practice...
To understand the burden of treatment-naive peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL). A systematic literature review was conducted in November 2020 following best practice methodology. Fifty-five clinical studies were included, mostly investigating cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (CHOP) or 'CHOP-like' regimens, with combination regimens showing similar effectiveness to CHOP alone. Aside from the combination of brentuximab vedotin + cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and prednisone (A+CHP), other available treatments showed no statistically significant benefit over CHOP in terms of overall or progression-free survival in overall PTCL patients. The mean monthly cost per patient in the USA ranged from 6328 to US$9356 based on six studies. One economic evaluation demonstrated A+CHP to be a more cost-effective treatment option than CHOP. Further research is needed to understand the humanistic and cost impact of frontline treatment for PTCL and its specific subtypes.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Brentuximab Vedotin; Cost of Illness; Cyclophosphamide; Doxorubicin; Female; Humans; Lymphoma, T-Cell, Peripheral; Male; Prednisone; Treatment Outcome; Vincristine
PubMed: 34851173
DOI: 10.2217/fon-2021-1032