-
Colorectal Disease : the Official... Apr 2022Anismus is a common cause of obstructed defaecation syndrome (ODS). The aim of the present review is to assess the efficacy and safety of puborectalis muscle (PRM)... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
AIM
Anismus is a common cause of obstructed defaecation syndrome (ODS). The aim of the present review is to assess the efficacy and safety of puborectalis muscle (PRM) division in the treatment of anismus.
METHOD
PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies that assessed the outcome of PRM division in the treatment of anismus. The main outcome measures were subjective improvement in ODS, decrease in the Wexner constipation score and ODS score, and complications, namely faecal incontinence (FI).
RESULTS
Ten studies (204 patients, 63.7% male) were included. The weighted mean rate of initial subjective improvement across randomized trials was 97.6% (95% CI 94%-100%) and across nonrandomized studies it was 63.1 (95% CI 39.3%-87%). The weighted mean rate of 12-month improvement across randomized trials was 64.9% (95% CI 53.3%-76.4%) and across nonrandomized studies it was 55.9% (95% CI 30.8%-81%). The weighted mean rate of FI across randomized trials was 12.1% (95% CI 4.2%-20%) and across nonrandomized studies it was 10.4% (95% CI 1.6%-19.3%). Male sex and unilateral PRM division were significantly associated with recurrence of symptoms after PRM division. Bilateral PRM division, posterior division, complete division and concomitant sphincterotomy were significantly associated with FI after PRM division.
CONCLUSIONS
The use of PRM division for treatment of anismus was followed by some initial improvement in ODS symptoms which decreased to <60% 12 months after PRM division. The mean rate of FI after PRM division, namely 10%-12%, is a limitation of the technique. Further well-designed trials are needed to verify the outcome of PRM division in the treatment of anismus.
Topics: Anus Diseases; Constipation; Female; Humans; Male; Pelvic Floor; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 34984814
DOI: 10.1111/codi.16040 -
Complementary Therapies in Medicine May 2023Postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction (PGD) is a common complication in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery. Several studies have evaluated the effect of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction (PGD) is a common complication in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery. Several studies have evaluated the effect of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) on PGD, so we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to better understand these studies methodologic limitations and summarize clinical effects.
METHODS
Articles (published from January 2010 to April 2022) were searched from the following databases: Wanfang Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science and Embase. Two authors conducted literature selection, data extraction and statistical analysis independently. This meta-analysis used RevMan 5.4 software to implement statistical analysis and applied Cochrane bias risk tool to assess methodologic weaknesses of included articles. We assessed the effect of TEAS on time to first flatus, first defecation and bowel sound recovery through meta-analyses using a random-effects model.
RESULTS
The meta-analysis included 10 articles including 1497 patients. This study showed that TEAS could effectively promote postoperative gastrointestinal function recovery by analyzing the time to first flatus (MD-14.81 h, 95% CI -15.88 to -13.75 h), time to first defecation (MD-14.68 h, 95% CI -20.59 to -8.76 h), time to bowel sound recovery (MD-5.79 h, 95% CI -10.87 to -0.71 h), length of hospital stay (MD-1.48d, 95% CI -1.86 to -1.11d), and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.29-0.58). In addition, we assessed the quality of the articles and found small sample sizes and lower methodological quality in some articles.
CONCLUSION
Our meta-analysis revealed that TEAS could be a nonpharmacological treatment for PGD in patients after gastrointestinal surgery. However, positive findings should be treated carefully and future studies with high quality and large samples are needed to support this results.
Topics: Humans; Digestive System Surgical Procedures; Acupuncture Points; Flatulence; Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting; Postoperative Period; Gastrointestinal Diseases
PubMed: 36842636
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctim.2023.102938 -
Techniques in Coloproctology Sep 2020Dyssynergic defaecation is a common form of functional constipation that responds poorly to conservative interventions. This systematic review and meta-analysis assesses... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Dyssynergic defaecation is a common form of functional constipation that responds poorly to conservative interventions. This systematic review and meta-analysis assesses the effectiveness of biofeedback therapy for dyssynergic defaecation using global clinical improvement as the primary outcome, and resolution of the dyssynergic pattern on anorectal physiology and quality of life as secondary outcomes.
METHODS
MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, PsychInfo, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from inception to March 2019 using a predefined strategy. Randomised controlled trials of adult patients with dyssynergic defaecation and a biofeedback treatment arm were eligible for review. Studies including patients with secondary forms of constipation were excluded. Data abstraction and risk of bias assessments were conducted by consensus between two authors.
RESULTS
Eleven trials including 725 participants were included in the narrative review. Sixty-three percent of patients treated with biofeedback reported clinical improvement. Six studies included in the meta-analysis showed biofeedback superior to non-biofeedback therapy for the primary outcome (OR 3.63, CI 1.10-11.93, p = 0.03). Heterogeneity between trials and overall risk of bias was high.
CONCLUSIONS
Biofeedback therapy is recommended for patients referred to tertiary units with dyssynergic defaecation who fail conservative therapy. Future research should be directed towards identifying validated outcomes and the optimum method for delivering biofeedback therapy. Home biofeedback therapy may improve accessibility and recruitment to future clinical trials.
Topics: Adult; Biofeedback, Psychology; Constipation; Defecation; Humans; Quality of Life; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 32372153
DOI: 10.1007/s10151-020-02230-9 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Sep 2015Constipation is a common symptom experienced during pregnancy. It has a range of consequences from reduced quality of life and perception of physical health to... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Constipation is a common symptom experienced during pregnancy. It has a range of consequences from reduced quality of life and perception of physical health to haemorrhoids. An understanding of the effectiveness and safety of treatments for constipation in pregnancy is important for the clinician managing pregnant women.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effectiveness and safety of interventions (pharmacological and non-pharmacological) for treating constipation in pregnancy.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (30 April 2015), ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (30 April 2015) and reference lists of retrieved studies.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We considered all published, unpublished and ongoing randomised controlled trials (RCTs), cluster-RCTs and quasi-RCTs, evaluating interventions (pharmacological and non-pharmacological) for constipation in pregnancy. Cross-over studies were not eligible for inclusion in this review. Trials published in abstract form only (without full text publication) were not eligible for inclusion.We compared one intervention (pharmacological or non-pharmacological) against another intervention, placebo or no treatment.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and risk of bias, extracted data and checked them for accuracy.
MAIN RESULTS
Four studies were included, but only two studies with a total of 180 women contributed data to this review. It was not clear whether they were RCTs or quasi-RCTs because the sequence generation was unclear. We classified the overall risk of bias of three studies as moderate and one study as high risk of bias. No meta-analyses were carried out due to insufficient data.There were no cluster-RCTs identified for inclusion. Comparisons were available for stimulant laxatives versus bulk-forming laxatives, and fibre supplementation versus no intervention. There were no data available for any other comparisons.During the review process we found that studies reported changes in symptoms in different ways. To capture all data available, we added a new primary outcome (improvement in constipation) - this new outcome was not prespecified in our published protocol. Stimulant laxatives versus bulk-forming laxativesNo data were identified for any of this review's prespecified primary outcomes: pain on defecation, frequency of stools and consistency of stools.Compared to bulk-forming laxatives, pregnant women who received stimulant laxatives had significantly more improvement in constipation (risk ratio (RR) 1.59, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.21 to 2.09; 140 women, one study, moderate quality of evidence), but also significantly more abdominal discomfort (RR 2.33, 95% CI 1.15 to 4.73; 140 women, one study, low quality of evidence), and borderline difference in diarrhoea (RR 4.50, 95% CI 1.01 to 20.09; 140 women, one study, moderate quality of evidence). In addition, there was no significant difference in women's satisfaction (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.46; 140 women, one study, moderate quality of evidence).No usable data were identified for any of this review's secondary outcomes: quality of life; dehydration; electrolyte imbalance; acute allergic reaction; or asthma. Fibre supplementation versus no interventionPregnant women who received fibre supplementation had significantly higher frequency of stools compared to no intervention (mean difference (MD) 2.24 times per week, 95% CI 0.96 to 3.52; 40 women, one study, moderate quality of evidence). Fibre supplementation was associated with improved stool consistency as defined by trialists (hard stool decreased by 11% to 14%, normal stool increased by 5% to 10%, and loose stool increased by 0% to 6%).No usable data were reported for either the primary outcomes of pain on defecation and improvement in constipation or any of this review's secondary outcomes as listed above. Quality Five outcomes were assessed with the GRADE software: improvement in constipation, frequency of stools, abdominal discomfort, diarrhoea and women's satisfaction. These were assessed to be of moderate quality except for abdominal discomfort which was assessed to be of low quality. The results should therefore be interpreted with caution. There were no data available for evaluation of pain on defecation or consistency of stools.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
There is insufficient evidence to comprehensively assess the effectiveness and safety of interventions (pharmacological and non-pharmacological) for treating constipation in pregnancy, due to limited data (few studies with small sample size and no meta-analyses). Compared with bulk-forming laxatives, stimulant laxatives appear to be more effective in improvement of constipation (moderate quality evidence), but are accompanied by an increase in diarrhoea (moderate quality evidence) and abdominal discomfort (low quality evidence) and no difference in women's satisfaction (moderate quality evidence). Additionally, fibre supplementation may increase frequency of stools compared with no intervention (moderate quality evidence), although these results were of moderate risk of bias.There were no data for a comparison of other types of interventions, such as osmotic laxatives, stool softeners, lubricant laxatives and enemas and suppositories.More RCTs evaluating interventions for treating constipation in pregnancy are needed. These should cover different settings and evaluate the effectiveness of various interventions (including fibre, osmotic, and stimulant laxatives) on improvement in constipation, pain on defecation, frequency of stools and consistency of stools.
Topics: Adult; Constipation; Dietary Fiber; Female; Humans; Laxatives; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 26342714
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011448.pub2 -
European Journal of Pediatrics Sep 2017We updated our 2010 systematic review on the efficacy of probiotics in the treatment of constipation in children. The MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases;... (Review)
Review
UNLABELLED
We updated our 2010 systematic review on the efficacy of probiotics in the treatment of constipation in children. The MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases; clinical trial registries; and reference lists of included studies were searched to February 2017 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) performed in children, with no language restriction. The primary outcome measure was treatment success, as defined by the investigators. We included seven RCTs with a total of 515 participants. Included trials were heterogeneous with respect to study population, probiotic strains, dosages, study duration, and follow-up. Pooled results of two RCTs showed no significant difference between the Lactobacillus rhamnosus casei Lcr35 and placebo groups with respect to treatment success. Other probiotics were studied in single trials only. There was no significant difference between the probiotic and control groups with respect to treatment success. While some probiotic strains showed some effects on defecation frequency, none of the probiotics had beneficial effects on frequency of fecal incontinence or frequency of abdominal pain. Adverse events were rare and not serious.
CONCLUSION
Limited evidence does not support the use of any of currently evaluated probiotics in the treatment of functional constipation in children. What is Known: • Conventional treatment for functional constipation in children does not always provide satisfying improvement. • Probiotics have been suggested as potential treatment modalities for this condition. What is New: • Probiotics are ineffective for the management of functional constipation in children in terms of treatment success, frequency of fecal incontinence, and frequency of abdominal pain.
Topics: Abdominal Pain; Case-Control Studies; Child; Constipation; Fecal Incontinence; Humans; Lactobacillus; Probiotics; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 28762070
DOI: 10.1007/s00431-017-2972-2 -
European Journal of Oncology Nursing :... Oct 2021After the reversal of the temporary stoma, rectal cancer survivors are often confronted with bowel complaints largely impacting on their quality of life. This systematic... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
After the reversal of the temporary stoma, rectal cancer survivors are often confronted with bowel complaints largely impacting on their quality of life. This systematic review aims to identify and synthesise the experiences and needs of patients with rectal cancer confronted with bowel problems after stoma reversal.
METHODS
A systematic search was performed through Pubmed, CINAHL and Web of Science. Only studies with a qualitative design were included in this review. Quality assessment was done by the critical appraisal skill programme (CASP) Qualitative Studies Checklist. A thematic-synthesis was performed.
RESULTS
Of 2713 identified papers, 10 were included in this systematic review. Two general themes were identified: 'experiences and needs about bowel function before surgery' and 'experiences and needs afterwards'. Before restoration of continuity patients had to cope with the temporary stoma, and they felt uncertain about what to expect. Patients indicated that the timing of providing information was crucial but varied. Bowel problems after surgery had a physical and emotional impact on patients' family life. They were also confronted with shame and stigma. Patients were happy to be alive and cancer free but were hopeful that the bowel problems would resolve. They used several strategies to manage and cope with these symptoms. Peers and healthcare professionals proved valuable resources of support.
CONCLUSION
Rectal cancer survivors experience ongoing bowel problems after treatment. Patients describe experiences and needs before rectal cancer surgery and afterwards when confronting with bowel problems. Follow-up care should be organised proactively and focus on management strategies and emotional support.
Topics: Adaptation, Psychological; Defecation; Humans; Quality of Life; Rectal Neoplasms; Surgical Stomas
PubMed: 34543812
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2021.102018 -
The Journal of Pediatrics Oct 2023To summarize available data on defecation frequency and stool consistency of healthy children up to age 4 in order to estimate normal references values. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
To summarize available data on defecation frequency and stool consistency of healthy children up to age 4 in order to estimate normal references values.
STUDY DESIGN
Systematic review including cross-sectional, observational, and interventional studies published in English, that reported on defecation frequency and/or stool consistency in healthy children 0-4 years old.
RESULTS
Seventy-five studies were included with 16 393 children and 40 033 measurements of defecation frequency and/or stool consistency. Based on visual inspection of defecation frequency data, a differentiation was made between two age categories: young infants (0-14 weeks old) and young children (15 weeks-4 years old). Young infants had a mean defecation frequency of 21.8 per week (95 % CI, 3.9-35.2) compared with 10.9 (CI, 5.7-16.7) in young children (P < .001). Among young infants, human milk-fed (HMF) infants had the highest mean defecation frequency per week (23.2 [CI, 8.8-38.1]), followed by formula-fed (FF) infants (13.7 [CI 5.4-23.9]), and mixed-fed (MF) infants (20.7 [CI, 7.0-30.2]). Hard stools were infrequently reported in young infants (1.5%) compared with young children (10.5%), and a reduction in the frequency of soft/watery stools was observed with higher age (27.0% in young infants compared with 6.2% in young children). HMF young infants had softer stools compared with FF young infants.
CONCLUSIONS
Young infants (0-14 weeks old) have softer and more frequent stools compared with young children (15 weeks-4 years old).
Topics: Infant; Humans; Child; Child, Preschool; Infant, Newborn; Defecation; Cross-Sectional Studies; Milk, Human; Diarrhea; Food, Formulated; Feces
PubMed: 37331467
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2023.113559 -
Frontiers in Psychiatry 2021Clinical evidence suggests that acupuncture is effective for relieving abdominal pain and distension in acute pancreatitis (AP). However, there is a lack of systematic...
Clinical evidence suggests that acupuncture is effective for relieving abdominal pain and distension in acute pancreatitis (AP). However, there is a lack of systematic reviews and meta-analyses that provide high-quality evidence of the efficacy and safety of acupuncture in this context. To assess the efficacy and safety of acupuncture for relieving abdominal pain and distension in AP. We searched the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, and China Biomedical Literature databases. Randomized controlled trials of acupuncture plus routine treatment (RT) vs. RT alone or RT plus sham/placebo acupuncture were included. Primary outcomes included total effectiveness rate, VAS scores for abdominal pain and distension, and time until relief of abdominal pain and distension. Secondary outcomes included time until recovery of bowel sound, time until first defecation, length of hospital stay, and APACHE II score. Nineteen eligible original studies ( = 1,503) were included. The results showed that acupuncture in combination with RT had a significant advantage in terms of increasing the total effectiveness rate [risk ratio: 1.15; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.06-1.24; = 0.001]. Acupuncture also reduced the VAS score for abdominal pain [weighted mean difference (WMD): -1.45; 95% CI: -1.71 to -1.19; < 0.0001] and the VAS score for abdominal distension (WMD: -0.71; 95% CI: -1.04 to -0.37; < 0.0001) in patients with AP. Other results also showed the efficacy of acupuncture. One study reported adverse events after acupuncture. Acupuncture in combination with RT has a better effect than RT alone for relieving abdominal pain and distension in AP. More rigorous studies are needed to confirm this result. PROSPERO CRD42019147503 (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=147503).
PubMed: 34925110
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.786401 -
Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced... Apr 2017To compare intracorporeal anastomosis (IA) and extracorporeal anastomosis (EA) in laparoscopic right colectomy (LRC) in terms of intraoperative and postoperative... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis Review
AIM
To compare intracorporeal anastomosis (IA) and extracorporeal anastomosis (EA) in laparoscopic right colectomy (LRC) in terms of intraoperative and postoperative outcomes.
METHODS
A systematic literature search with no limits was performed in PubMed and Embase. The last search was performed on April 9, 2016. The outcomes of interests included intraoperative outcomes (operative time, blood loss, length of incision, conversion, lymph nodes harvested, and intraoperative complications) and postoperative outcomes (time to first flatus, time to first defecation, time to liquid diet, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, mortality, ileus, anastomotic leakage, anastomotic bleeding, wound infection, hernia, and intra-abdominal abscess).
RESULTS
Fifteen articles and four conference abstracts published between 2004 and 2016 with a total of 1957 patients were enrolled in this meta-analysis. IA was associated with significant less blood loss, smaller length of incision, shorter time to first defecation, shorter time to liquid diet, and shorter length of hospital stay. No differences were found for operative time, conversion, lymph nodes harvested, intraoperative complications, time to first flatus, postoperative complications, mortality, anastomotic leakage, anastomotic bleeding, ileus, wound infection, intra-abdominal abscess, or hernia between IA and EA.
CONCLUSION
Our meta-analysis suggests that the IA for LRC improves cosmesis and results in better postoperative recovery outcomes without increasing intraoperative and postoperative complications. Furthermore, a large randomized control study is warranted to compare the short-term and long-term outcomes of those two anastomosis techniques.
Topics: Abdominal Abscess; Anastomosis, Surgical; Anastomotic Leak; Colectomy; Colon, Ascending; Humans; Ileus; Intraoperative Complications; Laparoscopy; Length of Stay; Lymph Node Excision; Lymph Nodes; Operative Time; Postoperative Complications; Postoperative Hemorrhage; Postoperative Period; Surgical Wound Infection; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 27768552
DOI: 10.1089/lap.2016.0485 -
BMC Public Health Feb 2019The significance of sanitation to safeguard human health is irrefutable and has important public health dimensions. Access to sanitation has been essential for human...
BACKGROUND
The significance of sanitation to safeguard human health is irrefutable and has important public health dimensions. Access to sanitation has been essential for human dignity, health and well-being. Despite 15 years of conjunctive efforts under the global action plans like Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), 2.3 billion people have no access to improved sanitation facilities (flush latrine or pit latrine) and nearly 892 million of the total world's population is still practicing open defecation.
METHODS
The study provides a systematic review of the published literature related to implications of open defecation that goes beyond the scope of addressing health outcomes by also investigating social outcomes associated with open defecation. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) was used to frame the review, empirical studies focusing upon open defecation in women aged 13-50 in low and middle income countries were included in the review. Research papers included in the review were assessed for quality using appropriate critical appraisal tools. In total 9 articles were included in the review; 5 of these related to health effects and 4 related to social effects of open defecation.
RESULTS
The review identified 4 overarching themes; Health Impacts of open defecation, Increased risk of sexual exploitation, Threat to women's privacy and dignity and Psychosocial stressors linked to open defecation, which clearly present a serious situation of poor sanitation in rural communities of Lower-Middle Income Countries (LMICs). The findings of the review identified that open defecation promotes poor health in women with long-term negative effects on their psychosocial well-being, however it is a poorly researched topic.
CONCLUSION
The health and social needs of women and girls remain largely unmet and often side-lined in circumstances where toilets in homes are not available. Further research is critically required to comprehend the generalizability of effects of open defecation on girls and women.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION
CRD42019119946 . Registered 9 January 2019 .
Topics: Defecation; Female; Humans; Sanitation; Social Determinants of Health; Women's Health
PubMed: 30727975
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-019-6423-z