-
Neuromuscular Disorders : NMD Aug 2022Chronic immune mediated neuropathy is a heterogenous group of peripheral nerve diseases, encompassing chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP),...
Chronic immune mediated neuropathy is a heterogenous group of peripheral nerve diseases, encompassing chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), autoimmune nodopathy, multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN), and anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG) neuropathy. Rituximab (RTX) is a chimeric monoclonal antibody targeting the CD20 antigen, which has been used in the treatment of autoimmune neuropathies, although the efficacy of RTX remains unclear. A literature search was performed using Medline, Embase and Cochrane Register for studies between 2000 and 2021 using the search terms "Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy" OR "Multifocal motor neuropathy" OR "Myelin associated glycoprotein" OR "Distal acquired demyelinating neuropathy" OR "Multifocal acquired demyelinating sensory and motor neuropathy" OR "demyelinating neuropathy" AND "Rituximab". Twenty-three studies were included, of which two were randomised controlled trials, 6 prospective studies and 15 retrospective studies. RTX was effective in 63% of CIDP patients, 48% of anti-MAG neuropathy, and 96% of patients with autoimmune nodopathy. Neurophysiological improvement was evident in 58% of CIDP and 40% of anti-MAG neuropathy patients. Low rates of serious adverse events (2.6%) were observed. These results indicate that RTX has potential as a treatment in immune mediated polyneuropathy, although the quality of evidence supporting its use it poor. Randomized controlled trials are required to reliably establish the efficacy and safety of RTX. Trial registration number: CRD42020179666.
Topics: Humans; Polyneuropathies; Polyradiculoneuropathy, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Rituximab
PubMed: 35672205
DOI: 10.1016/j.nmd.2022.05.013 -
Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders Dec 2023Persons with multiple sclerosis (MS) engage in less physical activity than the general population, and the disease manifestations and comorbidity conditions might... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Persons with multiple sclerosis (MS) engage in less physical activity than the general population, and the disease manifestations and comorbidity conditions might further predispose them toward sedentary behavior (SB) among this population. We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis of studies that compared SB in persons with MS and non-MS controls, and examined factors that may moderate the difference in SB between the two groups.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic search using PubMed, PsycINFO, Scopus, and CINAHL from inception up to August 2022, and identified studies that involved group comparison of SB outcomes between MS and non-MS controls. Effect sizes were calculated as standardized mean differences (SMDs) using Hedge's g. We generated a multilevel random-effects model for estimating an overall effect, and performed moderator analyses. Methodological quality was assessed using the Appraisal Tool for Cross-Sectional Studies (AXIS tool).
RESULTS
Eleven studies were included (1403 MS vs. 449 controls) and yielded 17 effects for meta-analysis. Results indicated an overall small, but significant effect (SMD [95% CI] = 0.27 [0.02, 0.53], p = 0.03) with significant heterogeneity (Q = 72.2, p < 0.01; I = 75.8%). There were larger effects when the MS sample had a higher proportion of females, or when SB was reported as percent sedentary time per day compared with other SB outcomes (p = 0.03 and 0.05, respectively). The included studies achieved fairly good quality (91.4%) using the AXIS tool.
CONCLUSIONS
The cumulative evidence supports that persons with MS engage in more SB than non-MS controls. Our findings may support the design of targeted behavioral change interventions for reducing SB and improving health and function in the MS population.
Topics: Female; Humans; Sedentary Behavior; Multiple Sclerosis; Cross-Sectional Studies; Exercise
PubMed: 37956522
DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2023.105124 -
Immunologic Research Feb 2017Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is a rapid-onset muscle weakness disease caused by the immune-mediated damage of the peripheral nervous system. Since there is an increase... (Review)
Review
Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is a rapid-onset muscle weakness disease caused by the immune-mediated damage of the peripheral nervous system. Since there is an increase incidence of GBS cases in Latin America, particularly in Colombia, and most of them are currently preceded by Zika virus (ZIKV) infection, we aimed to assess the available evidence of the disease in Colombia through a systematic literature review. Out of 51 screened abstracts, only 16 corresponded to articles that met inclusion criteria, of which 15 were case reports or case series. A total of 796 cases of GBS were reported in the included articles. The majority of patients were males (66.8 %) and younger than 50 years old (94 %). An infectious disease before the onset of GBS was registered in 31 % of patients, with gastrointestinal or respiratory symptoms being the most frequently observed. In those cases in which electrodiagnostic tests were performed, the most common subphenotype was acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (17 %). Death was reported in 15 % of patients. Data regarding GBS in Colombia is scant and heterogeneous. Taking into account the burden of the disease and the recent rise of GBS cases associated with ZIKV, a careful patient evaluation and a systematic collection of data are warranted. A form to data gathering is proposed.
Topics: Colombia; Guillain-Barre Syndrome; Humans
PubMed: 27421717
DOI: 10.1007/s12026-016-8816-8 -
Journal of Neurology Feb 2017The association between multiple sclerosis (MS) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has been suggested, apart from their common epidemiological and immunological... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
The association between multiple sclerosis (MS) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has been suggested, apart from their common epidemiological and immunological patterns, also due to observations of increased incidence of both IBD among MS patients and MS among IBD patients. We estimated the risk of concurrent IBD and MS comorbidity, using data from all available case-control studies. We calculated the corresponding Risk ratios (RRs) in each included case-control study to express the risk of IBD and MS concurrence at a given population. We performed additional subgroup analyses according to the type of registry from which the data of the cases were exported (IBD or MS registry) and the IBD type (Crohn's disease, CD or Ulcerative colitis, UC). We included 10 studies, comprising a total of 1,086,430 patients (0.08% of them with concurrent IBD and MS). Pooled RR for IBD/MS comorbitity was 1.54 (95% CI 1.40-1.67; p < 0.0001) with no differences (p = 0.91) among IBD and MS registries (RR 1.53, 95% CI 1.36-1.72, p < 0.001 for MS comorbidity in IBD patients vs. RR 1.55, 95% CI 1.32-1.81, p < 0.001 for IBD comorbidity in MS patients). No difference was also found on the risk of MS comorbidity among patients with CD or UC (RR 1.52, 95% CI 1.34-1.72, p < 0.001 vs. RR 1.55, 95% CI 1.38-1.74, p < 0.001; p for subgroup differences: 0.84). In all analyses no evidence of heterogeneity or publication bias was detected. Both IBD and MS patients seem to have a fifty-percent increased risk of MS or IBD comorbidity, respectively, with no apparent differences between patients with CD or UC.
Topics: Comorbidity; Humans; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases; Multiple Sclerosis
PubMed: 27878439
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-016-8340-8 -
Survey of Ophthalmology 2017The association between multiple sclerosis (MS) and uveitis has been questioned. Nerve tissue and eye tissue develop from the same embryonic cells; thus, MS and uveitis... (Review)
Review
The association between multiple sclerosis (MS) and uveitis has been questioned. Nerve tissue and eye tissue develop from the same embryonic cells; thus, MS and uveitis could be etiologically associated. In published studies, the prevalence of MS in patients with uveitis differe from 0.7% to 30.4%, whereas the prevalence of uveitis in patients with MS differe from 0.65% to 36.7%. Based on the largest retrospective studies, the prevalence of uveitis among MS patients is ∼1%, and the prevalence of MS among patients with uveitis is ∼1%. This is considerably higher than in the general population; thus, more research on this topic is needed to further understand the relationship between MS and uveitis.
Topics: Autoimmunity; Global Health; Humans; Multiple Sclerosis; Prevalence; Uveitis
PubMed: 27491475
DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2016.07.002 -
Neurology Apr 2016To reach consensus about the most relevant comorbidities to study in multiple sclerosis (MS) with respect to incidence, prevalence, and effect on outcomes; review...
OBJECTIVE
To reach consensus about the most relevant comorbidities to study in multiple sclerosis (MS) with respect to incidence, prevalence, and effect on outcomes; review datasets that may support studies of comorbidity in MS; and identify MS outcomes that should be prioritized in such studies.
METHODS
We held an international workshop to meet these objectives, informed by a systematic review of the incidence and prevalence of comorbidity in MS, and an international survey regarding research priorities for comorbidity.
RESULTS
We recommend establishing age- and sex-specific incidence and prevalence estimates for 5 comorbidities (depression, anxiety, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes); evaluating the effect of 7 comorbidities (depression, anxiety, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, chronic lung disease, and autoimmune diseases) on disability, quality of life, brain atrophy and other imaging parameters, health care utilization, employment, and mortality, including age, sex, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and disease duration as potential confounders; harmonizing study designs across jurisdictions; and conducting such studies worldwide. Ultimately, clinical trials of treating comorbidity in MS are needed.
CONCLUSION
Our recommendations will help address knowledge gaps regarding the incidence, prevalence, and effect of comorbidity on outcomes in MS.
Topics: Comorbidity; Humans; Multiple Sclerosis; Observational Studies as Topic; Research Design
PubMed: 26865523
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002474 -
BMC Neurology Apr 2023The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has affected the mental health, sleep and quality of life, especially in individuals with chronic disease. Therefore,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on neuropsychiatric and sleep disorders, and quality of life in individuals with neurodegenerative and demyelinating diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.
BACKGROUND
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has affected the mental health, sleep and quality of life, especially in individuals with chronic disease. Therefore, the purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on neuropsychiatric disorders (depression, anxiety, stress), sleep disorders (sleep quality, insomnia) and quality of life in individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD), Multiple Sclerosis (MS) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) compared to healthy controls.
METHODS
Seven databases (Medline, Embase, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, Scielo and Lilacs) were searched between March 2020 and December 2022. Observational studies (i.e., cross-sectional, case-control, cohort) were included. GRADE approach was used to assess the quality of evidence and strength of the recommendation. Effect size was calculated using standardized mean differences (SMD; random effects model). A customized Downs and Black checklist was used to assess the risk of bias.
RESULTS
Eighteen studies (PD = 7, MS = 11) were included. A total of 627 individuals with PD (healthy controls = 857) and 3923 individuals with MS (healthy controls = 2432) were analyzed. Twelve studies (PD = 4, MS = 8) were included in the meta-analysis. Individuals with PD had significantly elevated levels of depression (very low evidence, SMD = 0.40, p = 0.04) and stress (very low evidence, SMD = 0.60, p < 0.0001). There was no difference in anxiety (p = 0.08). Individuals with MS had significantly higher levels of depression (very low evidence, SMD = 0.73, p = 0.007) and stress (low evidence, SMD = 0.69, p = 0.03) and low quality of life (very low evidence, SMD = 0.77, p = 0.006). There was no difference in anxiety (p = 0.05) and sleep quality (p = 0.13). It was not possible to synthesize evidence in individuals with AD and sleep disorder (insomnia).
CONCLUSION
In general, the COVID-19 pandemic negatively impacted individuals with PD and MS. Individuals with PD showed significantly higher levels of depression and stress; and individuals with MS presented significantly higher depression and stress levels, as well as significantly lower quality of life when compared to healthy controls. Further studies are needed to investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in individuals with AD.
Topics: Humans; Pandemics; COVID-19; Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders; Quality of Life; Cross-Sectional Studies; Sleep Wake Disorders; Parkinson Disease; Demyelinating Diseases; Depression
PubMed: 37046209
DOI: 10.1186/s12883-023-03176-9 -
Nutrients Jun 2023Vitamin D supplementation has been considered a possible treatment to reduce the risk of disease activity and progression in people with multiple sclerosis (MS).... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Vitamin D supplementation has been considered a possible treatment to reduce the risk of disease activity and progression in people with multiple sclerosis (MS). However, its effect on disease symptoms remains unclear. The aim of this meta-analysis was to conduct a systematic review to assess the effect of vitamin D on fatigue in this population. The systematic review was conducted using the MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase and Web of Science databases from inception to May 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting pre-post changes in fatigue after vitamin D supplementation were included. Pooled effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated by applying a random effects model with Stata/SE (Version 16.0; StataCorp., College Station, TX, USA). The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed. A total of five studies with 345 individuals (271 females; age range: 25.4-41.1 years) were included. A significant reduction in fatigue was perceived when vitamin D supplementation was compared with a control group: -0.18 (95% CI: -0.36 to -0.01; I = 0%). Thus, our findings show that the therapeutic use of vitamin D on fatigue in people with MS could be considered. Nevertheless, due to the lack of agreement on the dose to be applied, it is recommended to use it under medical prescription.
Topics: Adult; Female; Humans; Dietary Supplements; Fatigue; Multiple Sclerosis; Vitamin D; Male
PubMed: 37447189
DOI: 10.3390/nu15132861 -
Journal of Neurology Feb 2022Since the declaration of COVID-19 pandemic, several case reports of demyelination of both peripheral and central nervous systems have been published. The association... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Since the declaration of COVID-19 pandemic, several case reports of demyelination of both peripheral and central nervous systems have been published. The association between CNS demyelination and viral infection has long been documented, and this link was recently reported following SARS-CoV-2 infection as well.
OBJECTIVES
In this systematic review, we aim to investigate the existing literature on CNS demyelination associated with SARS-CoV-2, and the proposed pathophysiological mechanisms.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review of articles in PubMed, SCOPUS, EMBASE, Cochrane, Google Scholar and Ovid databases, from 1 January 2020 until June 15, 2021. The following keywords were used: "COVID-19", "SARS-CoV-2", "demyelination", "demyelinating disease", "multiple sclerosis", "neuromyelitis optica", and "transverse myelitis".
RESULTS
A total of 60 articles were included in the final analysis of this systematic review and included 102 patients: 52 (51%) men and 50 (49%) women, with a median age of 46.5 years. The demyelination mimicked a variety of conditions with a picture of encephalitis/encephalomyelitis being the most common. At the same time other patterns were less frequently reported such as MS, NMOSD and even MOGAD. Longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis (LETM) was the most frequently reported pattern of spinal cord involvement.
CONCLUSION
A growing body of literature has shown an association between SARS-CoV-2 infection and the development of different types of CNS demyelination. Although causality cannot readily be inferred, this review may suggest a probable causal relationship, through a para-infectious or post-infectious immune-mediated etiology in COVID-19 patients. This relationship needs to be clarified in future research.
Topics: COVID-19; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myelitis, Transverse; Neuromyelitis Optica; Pandemics; SARS-CoV-2
PubMed: 34386902
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-021-10752-x -
Journal of Neurology Sep 2021Neurofilament proteins have been extensively studied in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, where they are promising biomarkers of disease activity and treatment... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Neurofilament proteins have been extensively studied in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, where they are promising biomarkers of disease activity and treatment response. Their role in progressive multiple sclerosis, where there is a particularly urgent need for improved biomarkers, is less clear. The objectives of this systematic review are to summarise the literature on neurofilament light and heavy in progressive multiple sclerosis, addressing key questions.
METHODS
A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Scopus identified 355 potential sources. 76 relevant sources were qualitatively reviewed using QUADAS-2 criteria, and 17 were identified as at low risk of bias. We summarise the findings from all relevant sources, and separately from the 17 high-quality studies.
RESULTS
Differences in neurofilament light between relapsing-remitting and progressive multiple sclerosis appear to be explained by differences in covariates. Neurofilament light is consistently associated with current inflammatory activity and future brain atrophy in progressive multiple sclerosis, and is consistently shown to be a marker of treatment response with immunosuppressive disease-modifying therapies. Associations with current or future disability are inconsistent, and there is no evidence of NFL being a responsive marker of purportedly neuroprotective treatments. Evidence on neurofilament heavy is more limited and inconsistent.
CONCLUSIONS
Neurofilament light has shown consistent utility as a biomarker of neuroinflammation, future brain atrophy and immunosuppressive treatment response at a group level. Neither neurofilament light or heavy has shown a consistent treatment response to neuroprotective disease-modifying therapies, which will require further data from successful randomised controlled trials.
Topics: Biomarkers; Humans; Intermediate Filaments; Multiple Sclerosis; Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Progressive; Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting; Neurofilament Proteins
PubMed: 32447549
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-020-09917-x