-
Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders Sep 2021Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory demyelinating CNS disease and the most common neurological immune-mediated disorder. Due to its progressive format, it affects... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory demyelinating CNS disease and the most common neurological immune-mediated disorder. Due to its progressive format, it affects patients' quality of life (QoL) significantly. This study aimed to evaluate epidemiologic parameters of MS in the Asia and Oceania continents.
METHODS
A comprehensive literature search on October 1st, 2020, was performed in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science to retrieve original population-based studies on MS epidemiology in the Asian and Oceanian countries, published between January 1st, 1985 and October 1st, 2020. The designed search strategy was repeated for each country, and the relevant referenced articles were added to our database. A random-effect model was used to combine the epidemiological estimates, and subgroup analysis was also performed by continent, region, and country, when possible. Meta-regression analysis was done to evaluate the effects of Human Developmental Index (HDI), latitude, and study period on the epidemiologic parameters.
RESULTS
A total of 3,109 publications were found, of which 89 articles met the eligibility criteria and were included for data extraction. These articles provided data on prevalence, incidence, and mean age at disease onset in 18 countries in Asia and Oceania, including Iran, Turkey, Cyprus, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, UAE, Jordan, Israel, India, Malaysia, China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Republic of Korea, Japan, Australia, and New Zealand. The pooled total prevalence, incidence, and mean age of onset in Asia and Oceania were 37.89/100000 (95% CI: 35.65 - 40.142), 2.40/100000 (95% CI: 2.22 - 2.58), and 28.21 (95% CI: 27.55 - 28.88), respectively. MS prevalence and incidence in the female gender (68.7/100000 and 4.42/100000, respectively) were infinitely higher than in the male gender (24.52/100000 and 2.06/100000, respectively). Our subgroup analysis showed that MS was much more prevalent in Australia and West Asia among the studied area. The meta-regression showed that the total incidence decreased with an increase in the HDI, and the total prevalence in Asia increased with increasing latitude gradients. Also, the study period had a positive effect on the total prevalence and incidence in Asia and Oceania.
CONCLUSION
MS prevalence and incidence have increased in recent decades. This study highlights the need for further studies to elucidate MS's geographical and temporal variations' exact etiologies.
Topics: Asia; Female; Humans; Incidence; Male; Multiple Sclerosis; Oceania; Quality of Life
PubMed: 34247103
DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2021.103119 -
Cells Jun 2023Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic, progressive neuroinflammatory disease with a complex pathophysiological background. A variety of diverse factors have been... (Review)
Review
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic, progressive neuroinflammatory disease with a complex pathophysiological background. A variety of diverse factors have been attributed to the propagation of inflammation and neurodegeneration in MS, mainly genetic, immunological, and environmental factors such as vitamin D deficiency, infections, or hormonal disbalance. Recently, the importance of the gut-brain axis for the development of many neurological conditions, including stroke, movement disorders, and neuroinflammatory disorders, has been postulated. The purpose of our paper was to summarize current evidence confirming the role of the gut microbiome in the pathophysiology of MS and related disorders, such as neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMO-SD). For this aim, we conducted a systematic review of the literature listed in the following databases: Medline, Pubmed, and Scopus, and were able to identify several studies demonstrating the involvement of the gut microbiome in the pathophysiology of MS and NMO-SD. It seems that the most relevant bacteria for the pathophysiology of MS are those belonging to , , , , , , , and , while and have been demonstrated to play a role in the pathophysiology of NMO-SD. Following this line of evidence, there is also some preliminary data supporting the use of probiotics or other agents affecting the microbiome that could potentially have a beneficial effect on MS/NMO-SD symptoms and prognosis. The topic of the gut microbiome in the pathophysiology of MS is therefore relevant since it could be used as a biomarker of disease development and progression as well as a potential disease-modifying therapy.
Topics: Humans; Multiple Sclerosis; Gastrointestinal Microbiome; Neuromyelitis Optica; Vitamin D Deficiency; Inflammation
PubMed: 37443793
DOI: 10.3390/cells12131760 -
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery Dec 2016The natural history of multiple sclerosis (MS) in Brazil has been available in different regions of country. There is no nationwide population-based studies that express... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
The natural history of multiple sclerosis (MS) in Brazil has been available in different regions of country. There is no nationwide population-based studies that express general data in Brazil.
OBJECTIVE
To review and synthesize available data about MS in Brazil.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Systematic review was performed through a search of medical literature databases to identify Brazilian studies published during 1990-2012.
DATA SOURCES
PubMed, SciELO, and Lilacs.
KEYWORDS
"Brazil" or "Brazilian" combined with the following terms: "multiple sclerosis", "clinical profile", "demographic profile", "natural history", "clinical course", "pediatric", or "familial form".
RESULTS
In total of 45 pediatric and 1922 adult patients, the median age at onset was 10 years in pediatric patients and 32 years in adult patients. Women were more affected. Motor-control complaints and relapsing-remitting phenotype at onset were the most common. Predictors to disability and progression were number of relapses during the first year of disease, older age, male gender and African ancestry.
CONCLUSIONS
The profile of the MS in Brazilian seems to correspond to that observed in high-MS-prevalence areas. African ancestry is a risk factor to disability and progression early. In Brazil, factors that limit MS incidence do not interfere with the clinical pattern and outcomes.
Topics: Adult; Brazil; Child; Disease Progression; Female; Humans; Male; Multiple Sclerosis
PubMed: 27756020
DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2016.07.011 -
Journal of Integrative Neuroscience Feb 2024Several results support the hypothesis that a group of pathologies falling within the Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders (NMOSD) diagnostic criteria may coexist... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Several results support the hypothesis that a group of pathologies falling within the Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders (NMOSD) diagnostic criteria may coexist with Connective Tissue Diseases (CTD) in patients with a high susceptibility to autoimmune conditions. However, the relationship between NMOSD and rheumatologic diseases deserves further investigations to clarify all clinical aspects of this coexistence. We designed a systematic review and a proportional meta-analysis to estimate the association between CTD and MNOSD, with the aim of helping to plan the best strategy to achieve the most significant public health benefit for these conditions.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review of the literature published until February 2023, searching in four databases: PubMed, Web of Science, EmBase, and OVID. Then, we conducted a random-effects proportional meta-analysis and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist.
RESULTS
The literature search yielded an overall result of 3176 publications (272 from PubMed, 880 from Web of Science, 634 from EmBase and 1390 from OVID). Of these, 29 were included in this systematic review. Analyzing studies that recruited unselected patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) and Sjogren Syndrome (SjS), the pooled percentages of NMOSD overlapping were 0.6% (95% Confidence Interval [95% CI]: 0.1%-1.4%,) and 6.5% (95% CI: 4.7-8.6), respectively. Studies enrolling rheumatologic patients with nervous system symptoms involvement reported higher percentage of NMOSD (i.e., among SjS patients, a pooled percentage of 26.5%, 95% CI: 5.5-54.6%, was found). Similarly, recruiting patients with NMOSD, we found pooled percentages of SjS or SLE respectively of 7.0% and 3.5%.
CONCLUSIONS
Our research found that the coexistence of these two disorders was more frequent in female rheumatologic patients with a SjS diagnosis with neurological manifestations and in neurologic patients for whom a SjS diagnosis was suspected. Similarly, NMOSD are less frequently found in SLE and very rarely incident in Mixed Connective Tissue Disease (MCTD) patients. These considerations should be taken into account in clinical experience of rheumatologists and neurologists, since early diagnosis of both conditions may influence the timing of immunosuppressive therapy and the prevention of systemic disabilities.
Topics: Humans; Female; Neuromyelitis Optica; Aquaporin 4; Connective Tissue Diseases; Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic; Arthritis, Rheumatoid
PubMed: 38419451
DOI: 10.31083/j.jin2302035 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Nov 2021Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic immune-mediated disease of the central nervous system, with an unpredictable course. Current MS therapies such as disease-modifying... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic immune-mediated disease of the central nervous system, with an unpredictable course. Current MS therapies such as disease-modifying therapies focus on treating exacerbations, preventing new exacerbations and avoiding the progression of disability. Siponimod (BAF312) is an oral treatment, a selective sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulator, for the treatment of adults with relapsing forms of MS including active, secondary progressive MS with relapses.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the benefits and adverse effects of siponimod as monotherapy or combination therapy versus placebo or any active comparator for people diagnosed with MS.
SEARCH METHODS
On 18 June 2020, we searched the Cochrane Multiple Sclerosis and Rare Diseases of the CNS Trials Register, which contains studies from CENTRAL, MEDLINE and Embase, and the trials registry databases ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). We also handsearched relevant journals and screened the reference lists of published reviews and retrieved articles and searched reports (2004 to June 2020) from the MS societies in Europe and America.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomised parallel controlled clinical trials (RCTs) that evaluated siponimod, as monotherapy or combination therapy, versus placebo or any active comparator in people with MS. There were no restrictions on dose or administration frequency.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. We discussed disagreements and resolved them by consensus among the review authors. Our primary outcomes wereworsening disability , relapse and adverse events, and secondary outcomes were annualised relapse rate, gadolinium-enhancing lesions, new lesions or enlarged pre-existing lesions and mean change of brain volume. We independently evaluated the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach. We contacted principal investigators of included studies for additional data or confirmation of data.
MAIN RESULTS
Two studies (1948 participants) met our selection criteria, 608 controls and 1334 treated with siponimod. The included studies compared siponimod with placebo. Overall, all studies had a high risk of bias due to selective reporting and attrition bias. Comparing siponimod administered at a dose of 2 mg to placebo, we found that siponimod may reduce the number of participants with disability progression at six months (56 fewer people per 1000; risk ratio (RR) 0.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.65 to 0.94; 1 study, 1641 participants; low-certainty evidence) and annualised relapse rate (RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.56; 2 studies, 1739 participants; low-certainty evidence). But it might lead to little reduction in the number of participants with new relapse (166 fewer people per 1000; RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.15 to 1.00; 1 study, 94 participants; very low-certainty evidence). We observed no evidence of a difference due to adverse events for siponimod at 2 mg compared to placebo (14 more people per 1000; RR 1.52, 95% CI 0.85 to 2.71; 2 studies, 1739 participants, low-certainty evidence). In addition, due to the high risk of inaccurate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data in the two included studies, we could not combine data for active lesions on MRI scans. Both studies had high attrition bias resulting from the unbalanced reasons for dropouts among groups and high risk of bias due to conflicts of interest. Siponimod may reduce the number of gadolinium-enhancing T1-weighted lesions at two years of follow-up (RR 0.14, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.19; P < 0.0001; 1 study, 1641 participants; very low-certainty evidence). There may be no evidence of a difference between groups in the number of participants with at least one serious adverse event excluding relapses (113 more people per 1000; RR 1.80, 95% CI 0.37 to 8.77; 2 studies, 1739 participants; low-certainty evidence) at six months. No data were available regarding cardiac adverse events. In terms of safety profile, the most common adverse events associated with siponimod were headache, back pain, bradycardia, dizziness, fatigue, influenza, urinary tract infection, lymphopenia, nausea, alanine amino transferase increase and upper respiratory tract infection. These adverse events have dose-related effects and rarely led to discontinuation of treatment.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Based on the findings of the RCTs included in this review, we are uncertain whether siponimod interventions are beneficial for people with MS. There was low-certainty evidence to support that siponimod at a dose of 2 mg orally once daily as monotherapy compared with placebo may reduce the annualised relapse rate and the number of participants who experienced disability worsening, at 6 months. However, the certainty of the evidence to support the benefit in reducing the number of people with a relapse is very low. The risk of withdrawals due to adverse events requires careful monitoring of participants over time. The duration of all studies was less than 24 months, so the efficacy and safety of siponimod over 24 months are still uncertain, and further exploration is needed in the future. There is no high-certainty data available to evaluate the benefit on MRI outcomes. We assessed the certainty of the body of evidence for all outcomes was low to very low, downgraded due to serious study limitations, imprecision and indirectness. We are uncertain whether siponimod is beneficial for people with MS. More new studies with robust methodology and longer follow-up are needed to evaluate the benefit of siponimod for the management of MS and to observe long-term adverse effects. Also, in addition to comparing with placebo, more new studies are needed to evaluate siponimod versus other therapeutic options.
Topics: Adult; Azetidines; Benzyl Compounds; Humans; Multiple Sclerosis; Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Progressive
PubMed: 34783010
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013647.pub2 -
Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders Oct 2017Despite being one of the most common neurological disorders globally, the cause(s) of multiple sclerosis (MS) remain unknown. Cigarette smoking has been studied with... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Despite being one of the most common neurological disorders globally, the cause(s) of multiple sclerosis (MS) remain unknown. Cigarette smoking has been studied with regards to both the development and progression of MS. The Bradford Hill criteria for causation can contribute to a more comprehensive evaluation of a potentially causal risk factor-disease outcome relationship. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the relationship between smoking and both MS risk and MS progression, subsequently applying Hill's criteria to further evaluate the likelihood of causal associations.
METHODS
The Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycInfo, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for relevant studies up until July 28, 2015. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted for three outcomes: MS risk, conversion from clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) to clinically definite multiple sclerosis (CDMS), and progression from relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) to secondary-progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS). Dose-response relationships and risk factor interactions, and discussions of mechanisms and analogous associations were noted. Hill's criteria were applied to assess causality of the relationships between smoking and each outcome. The effect of second-hand smoke exposure was also briefly reviewed.
RESULTS
Smoking had a statistically significant association with both MS risk (conservative: OR/RR 1.54, 95% CI [1.46-1.63]) and SPMS risk (HR 1.80, 95% CI [1.04-3.10]), but the association with progression from CIS to CDMS was non-significant (HR 1.13, 95% CI [0.73-1.76]). Using Hill's criteria, there was strong evidence of a causal role of smoking in MS risk, but only moderate evidence of a causal association between smoking and MS progression. Heterogeneity in study designs and target populations, inconsistent results, and an overall scarcity of studies point to the need for more research on second-hand smoke exposure in relation to MS prior to conducting a detailed meta-analysis.
CONCLUSION
This first review to supplement systematic review and meta-analytic methods with Hill's criteria to analyze the smoking-MS association provides evidence supporting the causal involvement of smoking in the development and progression of MS. Smoking prevention and cessation programs and policies should consider MS as an additional health risk when aiming to reduce smoking prevalence in the population.
Topics: Humans; Multiple Sclerosis; Smoking
PubMed: 29055459
DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2017.07.020 -
Journal of Neurology Jun 2017Vaccinations are often the most effective tool against some disease known to mankind. This study offers a literature review on the role of vaccines regarding the risk of... (Review)
Review
Vaccinations are often the most effective tool against some disease known to mankind. This study offers a literature review on the role of vaccines regarding the risk of developing multiple sclerosis (MS) and MS relapse. The method used in this study is a systematic literature review on the database PubMed. The study found no change in risk of developing multiple sclerosis (MS) after vaccination against hepatitis B virus, human papillomavirus, seasonal influenza, measles-mumps-rubella, variola, tetanus, Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG), polio, or diphtheria. No change in risk of relapse was found for influenza. Further research is needed for the potential therapeutic use of the BCG vaccine in patients in risk of developing MS and for the preventive potential of the tetanus and diphtheria vaccine.
Topics: Animals; Humans; Multiple Sclerosis; Vaccination
PubMed: 27604618
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-016-8263-4 -
Neurological Sciences : Official... Jun 2023Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a progressive demyelinating disease of the central nervous system that has overlapping symptoms with multiple sclerosis... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a progressive demyelinating disease of the central nervous system that has overlapping symptoms with multiple sclerosis (MS) but differs from it in a variety of ways. Previous studies have reported conflicting results trying to estimate the number of individuals affected by them which is why we designed this systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the worldwide prevalence and incidence of NMOSD/NMO based on current evidence.
METHODS
We searched PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, and gray literature including references from the identified studies, review studies, and conference abstracts which were published up to February 1, 2022. We used all MeSH terms pertaining to "NMOSD," "NMO," and all the terms on "prevalence," "incidence," and "epidemiology" to identify the search components. Pooled effect sizes were measured using random-effect model by DerSimonian-Laird.
RESULTS
The prevalence and incidence rates of NMOSD/NMO ranged from 0.07 to 10 and 0.029 to 0.880 per 100,000 population, respectively. The overall pooled prevalence of NMO per 100,000 population was 1.54 (I: 98.4%, 95% CI: 1.13-1.96, P< 0.001) based on the 2006 criteria, 1.51 (I: 99.4%, 95% CI: 1.21-1.81, P < 0.001) based on the 2015 criteria and 2.16 (I: 89.4%, 95% CI: 1.46-2.86, P < 0.001) based on the 2006/2015 criteria. The overall annual incidence of NMO per 100,000 population was 0.155 (I: 95%, 95% CI: 0.115-0.195, P < 0.001) based on the 2006 criteria and 0.278 (I: 100%, 95% CI: 0.135-0.420, P < 0.001) based on the 2015 criteria. The prevalence rates were highest in French West Indies and South Korea, and lowest in Cuba and Australia, based on the 2006 and 2015 criteria, respectively. Also, the highest annual incidence rates were obtained for Sweden and Slovak republic and the lowest for Cuba and Australia based on the 2006 and 2015 criteria, respectively. All estimated rates were higher among females compared to males.
CONCLUSION
Although rare, NMOSD/NMO impact affected individuals in devastating ways. Several large-scale prospective studies are required to reach a comprehension of the epidemiological aspects of these notorious demyelinating conditions.
Topics: Male; Female; Humans; Neuromyelitis Optica; Prevalence; Multiple Sclerosis; Central Nervous System; Incidence
PubMed: 36745300
DOI: 10.1007/s10072-023-06617-y -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Apr 2016Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune, T-cell-dependent, inflammatory, demyelinating disease of the central nervous system, with an unpredictable course. Current MS... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune, T-cell-dependent, inflammatory, demyelinating disease of the central nervous system, with an unpredictable course. Current MS therapies focus on treating exacerbations, preventing new exacerbations and avoiding the progression of disability. However, at present there is no effective treatment that is capable of safely and effectively reaching these objectives. This has led to the development and investigation of new drugs. Recent clinical trials suggest that alemtuzumab, a humanised monoclonal antibody against cell surface CD52, could be a promising option for MS.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the safety and effectiveness of alemtuzumab used alone or associated with other treatments to decrease disease activity in patients with any form of MS.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Trials Register of the Cochrane Multiple Sclerosis and Rare Diseases of the CNS Group (30 April 2015), which contains trials from the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, LILACS and the trial registry databases ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. There was no restriction on the source, publication date or language.
SELECTION CRITERIA
All randomised clinical trials (RCTs) involving adults diagnosed with any form of MS according to the McDonald criteria, comparing alemtuzumab alone or associated with other medications, at any dose and for any duration, versus placebo or any other active drug therapy or alemtuzumab in other dose, regimen or duration. The co-primary outcomes were relapse-free survival, sustained disease progression and number of participants with at least one of any adverse events, including serious adverse events.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two independent review authors performed study selection, data extraction and 'Risk of bias' assessment. A third review author checked the process for accuracy. We used the Cochrane 'Risk of bias' tool to assess the risk of bias of the studies included in the review. We used the GRADE system to assess the quality of the body of evidence. To measure the treatment effect on dichotomous outcomes we used the risk ratio (RR); for the treatment effect on continuous outcomes, we used the mean difference (MD) and for time-to-event outcomes we used hazard ratio (HR). We calculated 95% confidence intervals (CI) for these measures. When there was no heterogeneity, we used a fixed-effect model to pool data.
MAIN RESULTS
Three RCTs (1713 participants) fulfilled the selection criteria and we included them in the review. All three trials compared alemtuzumab versus subcutaneous interferon beta-1a for patients with relapsing-remitting MS. Patients were treatment-naive in the CARE-MS and CAMMS223 studies. The CARE-MS II study included patients with at least one relapse while being treated with interferon beta or glatiramer acetate. Alemtuzumab was given for 12 or 24 months; for some outcomes, the follow-up period reached 36 months. The regimens were (a) 12 mg or 24 mg per day administered intravenously, once a day for five consecutive days at month 0 and 12 or (b) 24 mg per day, intravenously, once a day for three consecutive days at month 12 and 24. The patients in the other arm of the trials received interferon beta-1a 44 μg subcutaneously three times weekly after dose titration.At 24 months, alemtuzumab 12 mg was associated with: (a) higher relapse-free survival (hazard ratio (HR) 0.50, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.60; 1248 participants, two studies, moderate quality evidence); (b) higher sustained disease progression-free survival (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.87; 1191 participants; two studies; moderate quality evidence); (c) a slightly higher number of participants with at least one adverse event (RR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.06; 1248 participants; two studies; moderate quality evidence); (d) a lower number of participants with new or enlarging T2-hyperintense lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.91; 1238 participants; two studies; I(2) = 80%); and (e) a lower number of dropouts (RR 0.31, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.41; 1248 participants; two studies, I(2) = 29%; low quality evidence).At 36 months, alemtuzumab 24 mg was associated with: (a) higher relapse-free survival (45 versus 17; HR 0.21, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.40; one study; 221 participants); (b) a higher sustained disease progression-free survival (HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.69; one study; 221 participants); and (c) no statistical difference in the rate of participants with at least one adverse event. We did not find any study that reported any of the following outcomes: rate of participants free of clinical disease activity, quality of life, fatigue or change in the numbers of MRI T2- and T1-weighted lesions after treatment. It was not possible to perform subgroup analyses according to disease type and disability at baseline due to lack of data.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
In patients with relapsing-remitting MS, alemtuzumab 12 mg was better than subcutaneous interferon beta-1a for the following outcomes assessed at 24 months: relapse-free survival, sustained disease progression-free survival, number of participants with at least one adverse event and number of participants with new or enlarging T2-hyperintense lesions on MRI. The quality of the evidence for these results was low to moderate. Alemtuzumab 24 mg seemed to be better than subcutaneous interferon beta-1a for relapse-free survival and sustained disease progression-free survival, at 36 months.More randomised clinical trials are needed to evaluate the effects of alemtuzumab on other forms of MS and compared with other therapeutic options. These new studies should assess additional relevant outcomes such as the rate of participants free of clinical disease activity, quality of life, fatigue and adverse events (individual rates, serious adverse events and long-term adverse events). Moreover, these new studies should evaluate other doses and durations of alemtuzumab course.
Topics: Adult; Alemtuzumab; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Disease-Free Survival; Humans; Interferon beta-1a; Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 27082500
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011203.pub2 -
Reviews in Medical Virology Jan 2024Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is one of the immune-mediated demyelinating disorders. Multiple components, including the environment and genetics, are possible factors in the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is one of the immune-mediated demyelinating disorders. Multiple components, including the environment and genetics, are possible factors in the pathogenesis of MS. Also, it can be said that infections are a key component of the host's response to MS development. Finally, we evaluated the relationship between different pathogens and MS disease in this umbrella research. We systematically collected and analysed multiple meta-analyses focused on one particular topic. We utilised the Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science databases starting with inception until 30 May 2023. The methodological quality of the analysed meta-analysis has been determined based on Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews 2 and Grade, and graph construction and statistical analysis were conducted using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis. The Confidence Interval of effect size was 95% in meta-analyses, and p < 0.05 indicated a statistically meaningful relationship. The included studies evaluated the association between MS and 12 viruses containing SARS-CoV-2, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), Hepatitis B virus, varicella-zoster virus (VZV), human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6), HHV-7, HHV-8, HSV-1, HSV-2, Cytomegalovirus, Human Papillomavirus, and influenza. SARS-CoV-2, with a 3.74 odds ratio, has a significantly more potent negative effect on MS among viral infections. After that, EBV, HHV-6, HSV-2, and VZV, respectively, with 3.33, 2.81, 1.76, and 1.72 odds ratios, had a significantly negative relationship with MS (p < 0.05). Although the theoretical evidence mostly indicates that EBV has the greatest effect on MS, recent epidemiological studies have challenged this conclusion and put forward possibilities that SARS-CoV-2 is the culprit. Hence, it was necessary to investigate the effects of SARS-CoV-2 and EBV on MS.
Topics: Humans; Multiple Sclerosis; Herpesvirus 4, Human; Epstein-Barr Virus Infections; Virus Diseases; Viruses; Herpesvirus 3, Human
PubMed: 38010852
DOI: 10.1002/rmv.2494