-
European Journal of Haematology Apr 2017This study aimed to systematically review and meta-analyze the value of pretransplant FDG-PET in predicting outcome after autologous stem cell transplantation in... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
This study aimed to systematically review and meta-analyze the value of pretransplant FDG-PET in predicting outcome after autologous stem cell transplantation in aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma. MEDLINE was systematically searched; included studies were methodologically assessed and meta-analyzed, when possible. Overall methodological quality of included studies (n = 11) was poor, with moderate risk of bias in the domains of study participation (n = 7) and prognostic factor measurement (n = 7), and high risk of bias in the domains of outcome measurement (n = 10), and study confounding (n = 11). In all aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphomas, pooled sensitivity and specificity were 54.0% and 73.1% in predicting treatment failure, and 54.5% and 68.7% in predicting death. Because of interstudy heterogeneity, additional subgroup analyses were performed. In newly diagnosed aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma, pooled sensitivity and specificity were 20.0% and 70.0% in predicting treatment failure, and 8.3% % and 30.5% in predicting death. In refractory/relapsed aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma, pooled sensitivity and specificity were 68.1% and 72.1% in predicting treatment failure, and 77.3% and 69.6% in predicting death. At present, pretransplant FDG-PET cannot be recommended in aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma, because available studies suffer from major methodological flaws, and reported prognostic estimates are low (i.e., poor in newly diagnosed and moderate in refractory/relapsed aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma).
Topics: Female; Glucose-6-Phosphate; Humans; Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin; Male; Positron-Emission Tomography; Predictive Value of Tests
PubMed: 27943422
DOI: 10.1111/ejh.12837 -
Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism Oct 2022To conduct a systematic literature review and meta-analysis to estimate the proportion of fever of unknown origin (FUO) and inflammation of unknown origin (IUO) cases... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES
To conduct a systematic literature review and meta-analysis to estimate the proportion of fever of unknown origin (FUO) and inflammation of unknown origin (IUO) cases that are due to rheumatic disorders and the relative frequency of specific entities associated with FUO/IUO.
METHODS
We searched PubMed and EMBASE between January 1, 2002, and December 31, 2021, for studies with ≥50 patients reporting on causes of FUO/IUO. The primary outcome was the proportion of FUO/IUO patients with rheumatic disease. Secondary outcomes include the association between study and patient characteristics and the proportion of rheumatic disease in addition to the relative frequency of rheumatic disorders within this group. Proportion estimates were calculated using random-effects models.
RESULTS
The included studies represented 16884 patients with FUO/IUO. Rheumatic disease explained 22.2% (95%CI 19.6 - 25.0%) of cases. Adult-onset Still's disease (22.8% [95%CI 18.4-27.9%]), giant cell arteritis (11.4% [95%CI 8.0-16.3%]), and systemic lupus erythematosus (11.1% [95%CI 9.0-13.8%]) were the most frequent disorders. The proportion of rheumatic disorders was significantly higher in high-income countries (25.9% [95%CI 21.5 - 30.8%]) versus middle-income countries (19.5% [95%CI 16.7 - 22.7%]) and in prospective studies (27.0% [95%CI 21.9-32.8%]) versus retrospective studies (20.6% [95%CI 18.1-24.0%]). Multivariable meta-regression analysis demonstrated that rheumatic disease was associated with the fever duration (0.011 [95%CI 0.003-0.021]; P=0.01) and with the fraction of patients with IUO (1.05 [95%CI 0.41-1.68]; P=0.002).
CONCLUSION
Rheumatic disorders are a common cause of FUO/IUO. The care of patients with FUO/IUO should involve physicians who are familiar with the diagnostic workup of rheumatic disease.
Topics: Adult; Fever of Unknown Origin; Fluorodeoxyglucose F18; Humans; Inflammation; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Rheumatic Diseases
PubMed: 35868032
DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2022.152066 -
Oncotarget Jun 201718F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) and PET/CT have become two of the most powerful tools for malignant lymphoma exploration, but their... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) and PET/CT have become two of the most powerful tools for malignant lymphoma exploration, but their diagnostic role in primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is still disputed. The purpose of our study is to identify the usefulness of 18F-FDG PET and PET/CT for detecting PCNSL.
RESULTS
A total of 129 patients, obtained from eight eligible studies, were included for this systematic review and meta-analysis. The performance of 18F-FDG PET and PET/CT for diagnosing PCNSL were as follows: the pooled sensitivity was 0.88 (95% CI: 0.80-0.94), specificity was 0.86 (95% CI: 0.73-0.94), positive likelihood ratio (PLR) was 3.99 (95% CI: 2.31-6.90), negative likelihood ratio (NLR) was 0.11 (95% CI: 0.04-0.32), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 33.40 (95% CI: 10.40-107.3). In addition, the area under the curve (AUC) and Q index were 0.9192 and 0.8525, respectively.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library were systematically searched for potential publications (last updated on July 16th, 2016). Reference lists of included articles were also checked. Original articles that reported data on patients who were suspected of having PCNSL were considered suitable for inclusion. The sensitivities and specificities of 18F-FDG PET and PET/CT in each study were evaluated. The Stata software and Meta-Disc software were employed in the process of data analysis.
CONCLUSIONS
18F-FDG PET and PET/CT showed considerable accuracy in identifying PCNSL in immunocompetent patients and could be a valuable radiological diagnostic tool for PCNSL.
Topics: Central Nervous System Neoplasms; Fluorodeoxyglucose F18; Humans; Immunocompetence; Lymphoma; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography; Positron-Emission Tomography; Radiopharmaceuticals
PubMed: 28514747
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.17456 -
Lung Cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) Dec 2021The role of PET and integrated PET-CT in the diagnostic workup of suspected malignant pleural effusions is unknown. Earlier systematic reviews (published 2014 and 2015)... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
The role of PET and integrated PET-CT in the diagnostic workup of suspected malignant pleural effusions is unknown. Earlier systematic reviews (published 2014 and 2015) both included pleural pathology without effusion, and reached contradictory conclusions. Five studies have been published since the latest review. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to summarise the evidence of PET and integrated PET-CT in predicting pleural malignancy in patients suspected of having malignant pleural effusions. A meta-analysis based on a systematic literature search in Cochrane Library, Medline, EMBASE and Clinicaltrials.gov was performed. Diagnostic studies evaluating the performance of PET or PET-CT in patients with suspected malignant pleural effusion, using pleural fluid cytology or histopathology as the reference test, and presenting sufficient data for constructing a 2x2 table were included. The quality of the studies was assessed by the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 score. Subgroup analyses on image modality, interpretation method and known malignancy status pre index-test application were planned. Seven studies with low risk of bias were included. The pooled ability to separate benign from malignant effusions varied with image modality, interpretation method and known malignancy status pre index-test application. In studies using PET-CT, visual/qualitative image analysis was superior to semi-quantitative with positive (LR + ) and negative likelihood ratio (LR-) of 9.9 (4.5-15.3) respectively 0.1 (0.1-0.2). There was considerable heterogeneity among studies. In conclusion, visual/qualitative image analysis of integrated PET-CT seems to add relevant information in the work-up of suspected malignant pleural effusions with LR + and LR- close to rigorous pre-set cut-offs of > 10 and < 0.1. However, the quality of evidence was low due to inter-study heterogeneity, and inability to assess meta-bias. Clinical Trial Registration: The protocol was uploaded to the PROSPERO database (CRD42020213319) on the 13th of October 2020.
Topics: Fluorodeoxyglucose F18; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Pleural Effusion; Pleural Effusion, Malignant; Pleural Neoplasms; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography; Positron-Emission Tomography; Radiopharmaceuticals; Sensitivity and Specificity
PubMed: 34775214
DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2021.10.018 -
European Journal of Medical Research Jan 2023To compare the detection rates of [Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET MRI/CT vs. [F]-FDG PET MRI/CT in gastric cancer. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES
To compare the detection rates of [Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET MRI/CT vs. [F]-FDG PET MRI/CT in gastric cancer.
METHODS
An extensive librarian-led literature search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Central Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov was performed. The primary outcomes were sensitivity in patient-based evaluations, detection of lymph node metastases, and peritoneal involvement.
RESULTS
Five studies, including 148 participants, were analyzed. [Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET MRI/CT has a comparatively high sensitivity in patient-based evaluations compared with [F]-FDG PET MRI/CT (risk difference = 0.16, 95% CI 0.09-0.22, P < 0.00001). The [Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET MRI/CT group has a comparatively higher sensitivity in detecting lymph node metastases (RR = 0.15, 95% CI 0.01-0.29, P = 0.04), peritoneal involvement (RR = 0.55, 95% CI 0.38-0.72, P < 0.00001) in gastric cancer than [F]-FDG PET MRI/CT group.
CONCLUSIONS
This systematic review confirmed the advantage of [Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET MRI/CT in gastric cancer. [Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET MRI/CT was superior to [F]-FDG PET MRI/CT in detecting the primary tumor, lymph node metastases, and peritoneal metastases. More studies are needed for the sensitivity and specificity of [Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET MRI/CT in different pathological types of gastric cancer.
Topics: Humans; Fluorodeoxyglucose F18; Gallium Radioisotopes; Stomach Neoplasms; Lymphatic Metastasis; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Carcinoma
PubMed: 36653862
DOI: 10.1186/s40001-023-00997-9 -
Journal of Nuclear Medicine : Official... Aug 2023Fibroblast-activation protein is a promising target for oncologic molecular imaging. Studies show that fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) radiotracers are... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Fibroblast-activation protein is a promising target for oncologic molecular imaging. Studies show that fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) radiotracers are accurate diagnostics with favorable tumor-to-background ratios across various cancers. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and metaanalysis to assess the diagnostic performance of FAPI PET/CT in comparison with [F]FDG PET/CT, the most widely used radiotracer in oncology. We conducted a systematic search in MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, relevant trial registries, and bibliographies. The search consisted of combinations of terms for 3 topics: neoplasia, PET/CT, and FAPI. Two authors independently screened retrieved articles using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria and extracted the data. Study quality was assessed using the criteria of QUADAS-2 (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2). For each study, the sensitivity, specificity, and 95% CIs were calculated to determine diagnostic accuracy for primary, nodal, and metastatic lesions. A random-effects metaanalysis was used for pooling the data, and heterogeneity was assessed (I index). Thirty-nine studies (1,259 patients) investigating the use of FAPI PET/CT were included. On a patient-based analysis, pooled sensitivity was 0.99 (95% CI, 0.97-1.0) for the detection of primary lesions. Pooled sensitivity for nodal and distant metastases was 0.91 (95% CI, 0.81-0.96) and 0.99 (95% CI, 0.96-1.0), respectively. On a paired analysis between FAPI and [F]FDG PET/CT, FAPI had a higher sensitivity in the detection of primary, nodal, and metastatic lesions (all < 0.001). The differences in sensitivities between FAPI and [F]FDG were statistically significant. In terms of heterogeneity, analyses on primary lesions were moderately affected, distant metastatic lesions were highly affected, and the nodal metastatic analyses had negligible heterogeneity. The diagnostic performance of FAPI PET/CT is superior to that of [F]FDG in the detection of primary, nodal, and distant metastases. However, further studies are needed to better evaluate its utility and indication in specific cancer types and clinical settings.
Topics: Humans; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography; Fluorodeoxyglucose F18; Medical Oncology; Positron-Emission Tomography; Molecular Imaging; Gallium Radioisotopes; Quinolines
PubMed: 37290798
DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.265471 -
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology Sep 2015The purpose of this study was to assess the diagnostic performance of FDG PET or PET/CT for detection of local, regional, and distant recurrences in the follow-up of... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this study was to assess the diagnostic performance of FDG PET or PET/CT for detection of local, regional, and distant recurrences in the follow-up of patients with head and neck cancer who underwent definitive treatment.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A systematic search was performed in MEDLINE and Cochrane Library (updated September 2014) to identify relevant published studies. Studies investigating the accuracy of FDG PET/CT that were performed at least 4 months after therapy were included. Two authors independently screened all retrieved articles, selected studies that met the inclusion criteria, and extracted the data. Histopathologic confirmation or clinical follow-up of at least 6 month (or both) was considered as the reference standard.
RESULTS
Twenty-three studies constituting a total of 2247 FDG PET/CT examinations met our inclusion criteria. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of follow-up PET/CT for detection of recurrence were 0.92 (95% CI, 0.90-0.94), and 0.87 (95% CI, 0.82-0.91), respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of scans performed 4-12 months after treatment were 0.95 (95% CI, 0.91-0.97) and 0.78 (95% CI, 0.70-0.84), respectively. Similar estimates for scans performed at or more than 12 months after treatment were 0.92 (95% CI, 0.85-0.96) and 0.91 (95% CI, 0.78-0.96), respectively. The overall accuracy of FDG PET/CT in detecting recurrence is higher in patients without suspicion of recurrence before the scan compared with the patients with suspected recurrence.
CONCLUSION
The high diagnostic performance of FDG PET/CT in detecting recurrence in curatively treated patients with head and neck cancer supports its use in clinical practice for patient follow-up. Further studies are needed to evaluate the prognostic utility of PET/CT in the follow-up of head and neck cancer.
Topics: Fluorodeoxyglucose F18; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Humans; Multimodal Imaging; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Positron-Emission Tomography; Radiopharmaceuticals; Tomography, X-Ray Computed
PubMed: 26295652
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.14.14166 -
Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine Oct 2021Vitreous humor has been extensively used in forensic practice to assess hyperglycemia after death. The results from different articles, for various hyperglycemia markers... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Vitreous humor has been extensively used in forensic practice to assess hyperglycemia after death. The results from different articles, for various hyperglycemia markers are highly variable, and a systematic analysis of the results from studies currently used in forensic practice as landmarks has not yet been performed. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate to usefulness and limits of using the values of vitreous glucose, lactic acid, beta-hydroxybutyrate, and 1,5 Anhydro-d-glucitol to detect postmortem hyperglycemia.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
For this purpose, we performed a systematic review and a meta-analysis using the random-effects model to identify the threshold values and average differences for the markers mentioned above in the vitreous humor of diabetic versus nondiabetic subjects.
RESULTS
We included eleven studies in the meta-analysis and found the following mean differences between the diabetic and nondiabetic groups: for glucose - 91.4 mg/dl, for lactate - 34.17 mg/dl, for the Traub formula - 111 mg/dl, for fructosamine - 0.71 mmol/L, for beta-hydroxybutyrate - 36.55 mg/dl and 1,5 Anhydro-d-glucitol - -15.2 mg/dl. We also gave practical recommendations, based on the range of values and 95% confidence intervals in normal subjects and controls to identify antemortem hyperglycemia and evaluated, whenever possible, threshold values for fatal diabetes.
CONCLUSIONS
Glucose, Traub formula, fructosamine, and beta-hydroxy-butyrate can be used to detect postmortem hyperglycemia with some limitations; 1,5 Anhydro-d-glucitol can only be used to suggest the absence of a hyperglycemic status before death.
Topics: 3-Hydroxybutyric Acid; Biomarkers; Deoxyglucose; Forensic Medicine; Fructosamine; Glucose; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Lactic Acid; Postmortem Changes; Vitreous Body
PubMed: 34488176
DOI: 10.1016/j.jflm.2021.102250 -
Clinical Nuclear Medicine Feb 202318F-FDG is the dominant radiotracer in oncology; however, it has limitations. Novel labeled fibroblast activation protein (FAP) radiotracers have been developed and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
18F-FDG is the dominant radiotracer in oncology; however, it has limitations. Novel labeled fibroblast activation protein (FAP) radiotracers have been developed and published in several studies. Thus, this meta-analysis aimed to compare the detection rates (DRs) of FDG and FAP, based on previous studies from a systematic review.
METHODS
PubMed/MEDLINE and Cochrane library databases were used to perform a comprehensive and systematic search and are updated to April 30, 2022. The DR, relative risk, and the SUVmax were calculated between the FAP and FDG tracers. Finally, the sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio, and summary receiver operating characteristic curve of FAP and FDG were analyzed using gold and reference standards.
RESULTS
Thirty studies (1170 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. The relative risks of FAP DR for the primary tumor, recurrent tumor, lymph node metastasis, and distant metastasis were FDG 1.06- to 3.00-fold per patient and per lesion. For the primary tumor, FAP uptake was most intense in pancreatic cancer, followed by head and neck, cervical, colorectal, lung, gastric, and hepatocellular carcinoma, and was higher than FDG except for urological system cancer. The sensitivity (0.84-0.98), diagnostic odds ratio (19.36-358.47), and summary receiver operating characteristic curve (0.94-0.99) of FAP based on patient and lesion were better for primary tumors, LN metastasis, and distant metastasis than FDG.
CONCLUSIONS
Fibroblast activation protein is an extremely potential radiotracer to replace most of the use of FDG in oncology. It is noteworthy that the FAP tracers for primary tumors had low specificity despite excellent sensitivity and had lower uptake than FDG in urological system cancer. In addition, the difference in detection between FAP and FDG for LN metastasis could not be certain in sarcoma.
Topics: Humans; Fluorodeoxyglucose F18; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography; Radiopharmaceuticals; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Positron-Emission Tomography; Sensitivity and Specificity
PubMed: 36607362
DOI: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000004438 -
European Journal of Radiology Feb 2024The aim of our meta-analysis and systematic review was to contrast the positivity rates of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI PET and [18F]FDG PET in detecting bone and lymph node metastases... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Head-to-head comparison of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI PET and [18F]FDG PET in the detection of bone and lymph node metastasis in various cancers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
PURPOSE
The aim of our meta-analysis and systematic review was to contrast the positivity rates of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI PET and [18F]FDG PET in detecting bone and lymph node metastases across diverse cancer types.
METHODS
We conducted a comprehensive search for eligible articles up until August 2023, utilizing databases including PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science. Studies focusing on the positivity rate of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI PET vs. [18F]FDG PET for bone and lymph metastasis were included. Using random-effect model, the positivity rate for [68Ga]Ga-FAPI PET and [18F]FDG PET were generated. In order to gauge the heterogeneity among aggregated studies, we utilized the I statistic. Additionally, we applied the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Performance Studies (QUADAS-2) methodology to evaluate the caliber of the studies encompassed in our analysis.
RESULTS
A total of 430 publications were initially identified in the search. Eventually, 25 studies, involving 779 patients, met the inclusion criteria. In terms of bone metastasis, the findings indicate no statistically significant difference between the use of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI PET and [18F]FDG PET (P = 0.34). However, concerning lymph node metastasis, the results demonstrate significant difference between the two imaging agents (P = 0.04).
CONCLUSIONS
This systematic review suggests that [68Ga]Ga-FAPI PET appears to outperform [18F]FDG PET in detecting lymph node metastases. However, when it comes to bone metastasis, no statistically significant difference was observed. It is crucial to acknowledge that the insights concerning bone metastasis stem from studies with comparatively modest sample sizes. Consequently, there is a pressing demand for further, expansive prospective studies in this field.
Topics: Humans; Fluorodeoxyglucose F18; Lymphatic Metastasis; Prospective Studies; Databases, Factual; Positron-Emission Tomography; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography; Gallium Radioisotopes
PubMed: 38219352
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111302