-
Academic Emergency Medicine : Official... Aug 2023Distinguishing peritonsillar abscess (PTA) from peritonsillar cellulitis using clinical assessment is challenging as many features overlap for both conditions, and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Distinguishing peritonsillar abscess (PTA) from peritonsillar cellulitis using clinical assessment is challenging as many features overlap for both conditions, and physical examination is only about 75% sensitive and 50% specific for diagnosing PTA. The primary objective of this systematic review was to determine the test characteristics of ultrasound for diagnosing PTA when compared to a reference standard of computed tomography or acquisition of pus via needle aspiration or incision and drainage.
METHODS
This systematic review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA) guidelines. We searched seven databases from 1960 to November 2022. Two independent reviewers completed study selection, data extraction, and QUADAS-2 risk-of-bias assessment. We used a bivariate random-effects model to calculate pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (LR+), and negative likelihood ratio (LR-). We also conducted subgroup analyses on radiology ultrasound compared to point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) and intraoral compared to transcervical scanning techniques.
RESULTS
From 339 citations, we identified 18 studies for inclusion. Because one study only reported positive cases of PTA (thereby preventing the calculation of specificity), it was excluded from the analysis, so the analysis included a total of 17 studies with 812 patients, of whom 541 had PTA. Pooled bivariate sensitivity was 86% (95% confidence interval [CI] 78%-91%), specificity 76% (95% CI 67%-82%), LR+ 3.51 (95% CI 2.59-4.89), and LR- 0.19 (95% CI 0.12-0.30). On subgroup analysis, radiology-performed ultrasound had a sensitivity and specificity of 89% and 71%, compared to POCUS, which had a sensitivity and specificity of 74% and 79%. Comparing the two different techniques, intraoral had a sensitivity and specificity of 91% and 75% while transcervical had a sensitivity and specificity of 80% and 81%.
CONCLUSIONS
Ultrasound demonstrates high sensitivity for ruling out PTA, but it only has moderate specificity for ruling in the diagnosis.
Topics: Humans; Peritonsillar Abscess; Ultrasonography; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Sensitivity and Specificity; Physical Examination
PubMed: 36625850
DOI: 10.1111/acem.14660 -
Telemedicine Journal and E-health : the... Nov 2023(Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Topics: Humans; Sensitivity and Specificity; Physical Examination; Diagnosis, Oral
PubMed: 36976779
DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2022.0426 -
Journal of Attention Disorders Oct 2023To identify and analyze all studies validating rating scales or interview-based screeners commonly used to evaluate ADHD in adults. (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
To identify and analyze all studies validating rating scales or interview-based screeners commonly used to evaluate ADHD in adults.
METHOD
A systematic literature search identified all studies providing diagnostic accuracy statistics, including sensitivity and specificity, supplemented by relevant articles or test manuals referenced in reviewed manuscripts.
RESULTS
Only 20 published studies or manuals provided data regarding sensitivity and specificity when tasked with differentiating those with and without ADHD. While all screening measures have excellent ability to correctly classify non-ADHD individuals (with negative predictive values exceeding 96%), false positive rates were high. At best, positive predictive values in clinical samples reached 61%, but most fell below 20%.
CONCLUSION
Clinicians cannot rely on scales alone to diagnose ADHD and must undertake more rigorous evaluation of clients who screen positive. Furthermore, relevant classification statistics must be included in publications to help clinicians make statistically defensible decisions. Otherwise, clinicians risk inappropriately diagnosing ADHD.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Self Report; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Sensitivity and Specificity; Mass Screening
PubMed: 37366274
DOI: 10.1177/10870547231177470 -
Ageing Research Reviews Sep 2021Myosteatosis, which is excessive fat infiltration in the skeletal muscle, is now considered a distinct disease from sarcopenia. Advances in imaging technique have made... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Myosteatosis, which is excessive fat infiltration in the skeletal muscle, is now considered a distinct disease from sarcopenia. Advances in imaging technique have made muscle parameters an evaluable biomarker, and many studies have proved association between myosteatosis and aging or disease process. However, the diagnosis and clinical impact of myosteatosis have not been well established. Thus, we aim to provide a systematic summary with a qualitive review of 73 eligible studies regarding these issues. First, the most widely used modality to diagnose myosteatosis is abdominal computed tomography, based on evaluation of the muscle radiodensity of the total abdominal muscle area predominantly at the L3 vertebral level. However, there was significant heterogeneity in the diagnostic methods and cutoff values used to diagnose myosteatosis (32 different cutoff values among 73 studies). Second, the clinical impact of myosteatosis on prognosis was very straightforward, and most studies have shown a negative impact of myosteatosis on overall survival and complications related to underlying diseases. However, the mechanism of the myosteatosis on mortality has not been explored well, and metabolic dysfunction (i.e. insulin resistance, systemic inflammation) would be a possible explanation. Providing systemic review of current issues can elucidate future directions for developing standardized diagnosis and management of myosteatosis.
Topics: Body Composition; Humans; Muscle, Skeletal; Prognosis; Sarcopenia; Tomography, X-Ray Computed
PubMed: 34214642
DOI: 10.1016/j.arr.2021.101398 -
Rheumatology International May 2023Polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) is an inflammatory joint disease in patients over 50 years of age with pain and prolonged morning stiffness in the shoulder and hip girdles...
Polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) is an inflammatory joint disease in patients over 50 years of age with pain and prolonged morning stiffness in the shoulder and hip girdles and neck. The lack of specific clinical findings, laboratory signs, biomarker and established imaging methods makes it difficult to diagnose patients with this disease. The aim of the systematic review is to present the literature data on the use of imaging methods for early diagnosis, assessment of disease activity and therapeutic response in PMR. At the same time, the advantages, disadvantages and contraindications of each method are considered. A literature search was carried out in PubMed and Scopus up to June 2022. Studies were selected that met the following criteria: (1) English language publications in peer-reviewed journals, (2) cohort or case-control studies and a series of more than five clinical cases, (3) studies of newly diagnosed or suspected PMR patients according to classification criteria or expert opinion, (4) imaging evaluation of articular, extraarticular and vascular impairment in PMR. Out of a total of 1431 publications, 61 articles were selected, which differed in the imaging techniques used: radiography (5), scintigraphy (4), magnetic resonance imaging (14), PET/CT (14) and ultrasound (24). Prevalence of extraarticular involvement (tendons, entheses and bursae) was identified in patients with PMR. In a significant number of cases, subclinical vasculitis of the large vessels was found, confirming the common pathogenetic pathways of the two diseases. The diagnostic, therapeutic and prognostic potential of imaging methods in PMR has been relatively poorly studied and remains to be clarified.
Topics: Humans; Middle Aged; Polymyalgia Rheumatica; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography; Giant Cell Arteritis; Pain; Ultrasonography
PubMed: 36853338
DOI: 10.1007/s00296-023-05284-8 -
Journal of Psychosomatic Research Sep 2016Functional somatic symptoms (FSS) are bodily complaints of unclear etiology, which are (currently) not fully explained by well-recognized somatic pathology. Doctors are... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Functional somatic symptoms (FSS) are bodily complaints of unclear etiology, which are (currently) not fully explained by well-recognized somatic pathology. Doctors are often hesitant to diagnose FSS, due to the risk to miss a somatic disease. The purpose of this study is to review available literature on the percentage of patients diagnosed with FSS reported to have an underlying somatic disease that explains their symptoms previously labeled as FSS.
METHODS
We performed a systematic search of Medline, Embase and PsycINFO databases and reference lists of selected articles. We included studies published between January 1980 and July 2014 without language restrictions. Studies that measured the percentage of underlying somatic diseases after a diagnostic evaluation or naturalistic follow-up period in adult patients initially diagnosed with FSS were included. As primary outcome measure the weighted percentage of revised diagnoses was calculated using meta-analyses.
RESULTS
Six diagnostic evaluation studies (total N=1804 patients) and 16 follow-up studies (total N=2440 patients) were included. The percentage of revised diagnosis in patients initially diagnosed with FSS was 8.8% (95% CI 1.0 to 22.2, p=0.007) in diagnostic evaluation studies and 0.5% (95% CI 0.01 to 1.5, p=0.03) in follow-up studies. Partially or possibly related diagnoses were rarely found. No specific somatic diagnosis seemed to be missed systematically.
CONCLUSIONS
The percentage of underlying somatic diseases in patients previously diagnosed with FSS is relatively small but unneglectable.
Topics: Diagnostic Errors; Humans; Medically Unexplained Symptoms; Somatoform Disorders
PubMed: 27455914
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2016.07.001 -
Journal of Endovascular Therapy : An... Aug 2014To quantitatively summarize the incidence of misdiagnosis of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAA), the most common presenting features, and the commonest incorrect... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
To quantitatively summarize the incidence of misdiagnosis of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAA), the most common presenting features, and the commonest incorrect differential diagnoses.
METHODS
A systematic search according to PRISMA guidelines was performed using EMBASE and MEDLINE databases to identify studies reporting the initial rate of misdiagnosis of patients with rAAA. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to estimate the rate of misdiagnosis, presenting features, and commonest differential diagnoses. A sensitivity analysis was performed for studies reporting after 1990.
RESULTS
Nine studies comprising 1109 patients contributed to the pooled analysis, which found a 42% incidence of rAAA misdiagnosis (95% CI 29% to 55%). In studies reporting after 1990, misdiagnosis was seen in 32% (95% CI 16% to 49%). The most common erroneous differential diagnoses were ureteric colic and myocardial infarction. Abdominal pain, shock, and a pulsatile mass were presenting features in 61% (49%-72%), 46% (32%-61%), and 45% (29%-62%) of rAAAs, respectively.
CONCLUSION
The rate of misdiagnosis of rAAA has remained consistent over time and is concerning. There is a need for an effective clinical decision tool to enable accurate diagnosis and triage at the scene of the emergency.
Topics: Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal; Aortic Rupture; Diagnosis, Differential; Diagnostic Errors; Humans; Predictive Value of Tests; Prognosis
PubMed: 25101588
DOI: 10.1583/13-4626MR.1 -
Microbial Pathogenesis May 2018The serum galactomannan (GM) assay is used to diagnose invasive aspergillosis (IA). We conducted a systematic review and analysis to estimate the overall accuracy of the... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
The serum galactomannan (GM) assay is used to diagnose invasive aspergillosis (IA). We conducted a systematic review and analysis to estimate the overall accuracy of the serum GM test for diagnosing pediatric IA.
METHOD
A systematic literature review was conducted of all relevant studies published in PubMed and EMbase databases up to March 10, 2017. We selected and assessed articles that reported diagnostic data related to serum GM for diagnosis of pediatric IA. Pooled diagnostic odds ratios (DORs) and summary receiver operating characteristics (SROCs) were constructed with a cutoff value of 0.5. Additionally, pooled sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE), and positive and negative likelihood ratios (PLR and NLR, respectively) were estimated for summarizing overall test performance.
RESULTS
Seventeen studies were included in this systematic review. The total number of patients (age range 0-21 years old) was 1768, with 178 that had proven or probable IA. The pooled serum GM assay results, with a cutoff value of 0.5 for proven or probable IA, were DOR: 41.16 (95% confidence interval (CI) 21.48-78.86), SEN: 0.85 (95% CI 0.72-0.93), SPE: 0.88 (95% CI 0.80-0.93), PLR: 6.92 (95% CI 4.40-10.88), and NLR: 0.17 (95% CI 0.09-0.32). The SROC was 0.93.
CONCLUSION
Serum GM can be used to assist in diagnosis of proven or probable pediatric IA. However, serum GM test results should be interpreted in combination with clinical findings in pediatric IA cases, as the test results are not always sensitive or specific enough for pediatric IA.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aspergillosis; Biomarkers; Child; Child, Preschool; Databases, Factual; Diagnostic Tests, Routine; Galactose; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis; Mannans; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Probability; ROC Curve; Sensitivity and Specificity; Young Adult
PubMed: 29614368
DOI: 10.1016/j.micpath.2018.03.059 -
Journal of Affective Disorders Apr 2018Reliability of schizoaffective disorder (SAD) diagnoses is low in adults but unclear in children and adolescents (CAD). We estimate the test-retest reliability of SAD... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES
Reliability of schizoaffective disorder (SAD) diagnoses is low in adults but unclear in children and adolescents (CAD). We estimate the test-retest reliability of SAD and its key differential diagnoses (schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and unipolar depression).
METHODS
Systematic literature search of Medline, Embase, and PsycInfo for studies on test-retest reliability of SAD, in CAD. Cohen's kappa was extracted from studies. We performed meta-analysis for kappa, including subgroup and sensitivity analysis (PROSPERO protocol: CRD42013006713).
RESULTS
Out of > 4000 records screened, seven studies were included. We estimated kappa values of 0.27 [95%-CI: 0.07 0.47] for SAD, 0.56 [0.29; 0.83] for schizophrenia, 0.64 [0.55; 0.74] for bipolar disorder, and 0.66 [0.52; 0.81] for unipolar depression. In 5/7 studies kappa of SAD was lower than that of schizophrenia; similar trends emerged for bipolar disorder (4/5) and unipolar depression (2/3). Estimates of positive agreement of SAD diagnoses supported these results.
LIMITATIONS
The number of studies and patients included is low.
CONCLUSIONS
The point-estimate of the test-retest reliability of schizoaffective disorder is only fair, and lower than that of its main differential diagnoses. All kappa values under study were lower in children and adolescents samples than those reported for adults. Clinically, schizoaffective disorder should be diagnosed in strict adherence to the operationalized criteria and ought to be re-evaluated regularly. Should larger studies confirm the insufficient reliability of schizoaffective disorder in children and adolescents, the clinical value of the diagnosis is highly doubtful.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Bipolar Disorder; Child; Depressive Disorder, Major; Diagnosis, Differential; Female; Humans; Male; Psychotic Disorders; Reproducibility of Results; Schizophrenia; Young Adult
PubMed: 29360577
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.12.070 -
Pediatrics Sep 2018Systemic hypertension is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in adulthood. High blood pressure (HBP) and repeated measures of HBP, hypertension (HTN), begin in...
UNLABELLED
Systemic hypertension is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in adulthood. High blood pressure (HBP) and repeated measures of HBP, hypertension (HTN), begin in youth. Knowledge of how best to diagnose, manage, and treat systemic HTN in children and adolescents is important for primary and subspecialty care providers.
OBJECTIVES
To provide a technical summary of the methodology used to generate the 2017 "Clinical Practice Guideline for Screening and Management of High Blood Pressure in Children and Adolescents," an update to the 2004 "Fourth Report on the Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure in Children and Adolescents."
DATA SOURCES
Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Excerpta Medica Database references published between January 2003 and July 2015 followed by an additional search between August 2015 and July 2016.
STUDY SELECTION
English-language observational studies and randomized trials.
METHODS
Key action statements (KASs) and additional recommendations regarding the diagnosis, management, and treatment of HBP in youth were the product of a detailed systematic review of the literature. A content outline establishing the breadth and depth was followed by the generation of 4 patient, intervention, comparison, outcome, time questions. Key questions addressed: (1) diagnosis of systemic HTN, (2) recommended work-up of systemic HTN, (3) optimal blood pressure (BP) goals, and (4) impact of high BP on indirect markers of cardiovascular disease in youth. Once selected, references were subjected to a 2-person review of the abstract and title followed by a separate 2-person full-text review. Full citation information, population data, findings, benefits and harms of the findings, as well as other key reference information were archived. Selected primary references were then used for KAS generation. Level of evidence (LOE) scoring was assigned for each reference and then in aggregate. Appropriate language was used to generate each KAS based on the LOE and the balance of benefit versus harm of the findings. Topics that could not be researched via the stated approach were (1) definition of HTN in youth, and (2) definition of left ventricular hypertrophy. KASs related to these stated topics were generated via expert opinion.
RESULTS
Nearly 15 000 references were identified during an initial literature search. After a deduplication process, 14 382 references were available for title and abstract review, and 1379 underwent full text review. One hundred twenty-four experimental and observational studies published between 2003 and 2016 were selected as primary references for KAS generation, followed by an additional 269 primary references selected between August 2015 and July 2016. The LOE for the majority of references was C. In total, 30 KASs and 27 additional recommendations were generated; 12 were related to the diagnosis of HTN, 13 were related to management and additional diagnostic testing, 3 to treatment goals, and 2 to treatment options. Finally, special additions to the clinical practice guideline included creation of new BP tables based on BP values obtained solely from children with normal weight, creation of a simplified table to enhance screening and recognition of abnormal BP, and a revision of the criteria for diagnosing left ventricular hypertrophy.
CONCLUSIONS
An extensive and detailed systematic approach was used to generate evidence-based guidelines for the diagnosis, management, and treatment of youth with systemic HTN.
Topics: Adolescent; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Blood Pressure Determination; Child; Female; Humans; Hypertension; Male; Mass Screening; Practice Guidelines as Topic
PubMed: 30126937
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2018-2096