-
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery May 2017Outcomes after implant arthroplasty for primary degenerative and posttraumatic osteoarthritis of the proximal interphalangeal joint were different according to the... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Review
BACKGROUND
Outcomes after implant arthroplasty for primary degenerative and posttraumatic osteoarthritis of the proximal interphalangeal joint were different according to the implant design and surgical approach. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate outcomes of various types of implant arthroplasty for proximal interphalangeal joint osteoarthritis, with an emphasis on different surgical approaches.
METHODS
The authors searched all available literature in the PubMed and EMBASE databases for articles reporting on outcomes of implant arthroplasty for proximal interphalangeal joint osteoarthritis. Data collection included active arc of motion, extension lag, and complications. The authors combined the data of various types of surface replacement arthroplasty into one group for comparison with silicone arthroplasty.
RESULTS
A total of 849 articles were screened, yielding 40 studies for final review. The mean postoperative arc of motion and the mean gain in arc of motion of silicone implant with the volar approach were 58 and 17 degrees, respectively, which was greater than surface replacement implant with the dorsal approach at 51 and 8 degrees, respectively. The mean postoperative extension lag of silicone implant with the volar approach and surface replacement with the dorsal approach was 5 and 14 degrees, respectively. The revision rate of silicone implant with the volar approach and surface replacement with the dorsal approach was 6 percent and 18 percent at a mean follow-up of 41.2 and 51 months, respectively.
CONCLUSION
Silicone implant with the volar approach showed the best arc of motion, with less extension lag and fewer complications after surgery among all the implant designs and surgical approaches.
Topics: Adolescent; Arthroplasty; Finger Joint; Humans; Joint Prosthesis; Osteoarthritis; Postoperative Complications; Prosthesis Design; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 28445369
DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003260 -
Pain Reports 2021Several animal and human studies revealed that joint and nerve mobilisations positively influence neuroimmune responses in neuromusculoskeletal conditions. However, no... (Review)
Review
Several animal and human studies revealed that joint and nerve mobilisations positively influence neuroimmune responses in neuromusculoskeletal conditions. However, no systematic review and meta-analysis has been performed. Therefore, this study aimed to synthesize the effects of joint and nerve mobilisation compared with sham or no intervention on neuroimmune responses in animals and humans with neuromusculoskeletal conditions. Four electronic databases were searched for controlled trials. Two reviewers independently selected studies, extracted data, assessed the risk of bias, and graded the certainty of the evidence. Where possible, meta-analyses using random effects models were used to pool the results. Preliminary evidence from 13 animal studies report neuroimmune responses after joint and nerve mobilisations. In neuropathic pain models, meta-analysis revealed decreased spinal cord levels of glial fibrillary acidic protein, dorsal root ganglion levels of interleukin-1β, number of dorsal root ganglion nonneuronal cells, and increased spinal cord interleukin-10 levels. The 5 included human studies showed mixed effects of spinal manipulation on salivary/serum cortisol levels in people with spinal pain, and no significant effects on serum β-endorphin or interleukin-1β levels in people with spinal pain. There is evidence that joint and nerve mobilisations positively influence various neuroimmune responses. However, as most findings are based on single studies, the certainty of the evidence is low to very low. Further studies are needed.
PubMed: 34104836
DOI: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000927 -
Neuropsychology Review Jun 2023Both substance-related as well as non-substance-related addictions may include recurrent engagement in risky actions despite adverse outcomes. We here apply a unified... (Review)
Review
Both substance-related as well as non-substance-related addictions may include recurrent engagement in risky actions despite adverse outcomes. We here apply a unified approach and review task-based neuroimaging studies on substance-related (SRAs) and non-substance related addictions (NSRAs) to examine commonalities and differences in neural correlates of risk-taking in these two addiction types. To this end, we conducted a systematic review adhering to the PRISMA guidelines. Two databases were searched with predefined search terms to identify neuroimaging studies on risk-taking tasks in individuals with addiction disorders. In total, 19 studies on SRAs (comprising a total of 648 individuals with SRAs) and 10 studies on NSRAs (comprising a total of 187 individuals with NSRAs) were included. Risk-related brain activation in SRAs and NSRAs was summarized individually and subsequently compared to each other. Results suggest convergent altered risk-related neural processes, including hyperactivity in the OFC and the striatum. As characteristic for both addiction types, these brain regions may represent an underlying mechanism of suboptimal decision-making. In contrast, decreased DLPFC activity may be specific to SRAs and decreased IFG activity could only be identified for NSRAs. The precuneus and posterior cingulate show elevated activity in SRAs, while findings regarding these areas were mixed in NSRAs. Additional scarce evidence suggests decreased ventral ACC activity and increased dorsal ACC activity in both addiction types. Associations between identified activation patterns with drug use severity underpin the clinical relevance of these findings. However, this exploratory evidence should be interpreted with caution and should be regarded as preliminary. Future research is needed to evaluate the findings gathered by this review.
Topics: Humans; Substance-Related Disorders; Brain; Behavior, Addictive; Neuroimaging; Risk-Taking
PubMed: 35906511
DOI: 10.1007/s11065-022-09552-5 -
The Journal of Hand Surgery, European... Jun 2016The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review in order to identify predictors of secondary displacement in distal radius fractures. We performed a systematic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
UNLABELLED
The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review in order to identify predictors of secondary displacement in distal radius fractures. We performed a systematic review and identified all studies that reported secondary displacement following distal radius fractures. Where possible, we pooled the odds ratios of predictors. The initial search yielded 3178 studies of which 27 were included. Multiple studies found that age, shortening, volar comminution, loss of radial inclination, the presence of a volar hook, AO type 3 fractures (A3, B3, C3) and the Older classification were significant predictors of secondary displacement. Pooling revealed a significantly increased risk of secondary displacement in fractures with dorsal comminution, in women and in patients aged >60 years. An associated ulna fracture or intra-articular involvement does not result in an increased risk of secondary displacement. The overview provided in this study can help surgeons to inform patients of the chances of success of closed treatment regarding the radiological outcome and facilitate shared decision making.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
II.
Topics: Age Factors; Fracture Fixation, Internal; Fracture Healing; Fractures, Comminuted; Humans; Joint Dislocations; Joint Instability; Postoperative Complications; Predictive Value of Tests; Radius Fractures; Risk Factors; Sex Factors
PubMed: 26420817
DOI: 10.1177/1753193415604795 -
Foot and Ankle Surgery : Official... Jun 2023The Zadek osteotomy, a dorsal closing wedge osteotomy of the calcaneus, has been described as a treatment option in patients with Insertional Achilles Tendinopathy (IAT)... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
The Zadek osteotomy, a dorsal closing wedge osteotomy of the calcaneus, has been described as a treatment option in patients with Insertional Achilles Tendinopathy (IAT) that have failed conservative management. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes and the complications of the Zadek for the management of IAT.
METHODS
PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trails (CENTRAL) were searched for all studies to November 2022. PRISMA guidelines were followed. The overall estimates of effect were presented as Weighted Mean Difference (WMD) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). Meta-analysis was conducted using the Review Manager Software (RevMan, Version 5.4).
RESULTS
Ten studies with 232 patients were included. Functional scores and pain levels were significantly improved after the Zadek osteotomy (p < 0.00001). There were a total of 22 complications reported in the included studies and they were all considered minor. The most common complications were superficial wound infection and sural nerve paraesthesia.
CONCLUSIONS
The Zadek osteotomy is a safe and effective procedure for patients with IAT. There are no well-designed randomized controlled trials in the literature assessing the outcomes of a Zadek osteotomy against alternate surgical treatments and future research should focus on this.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
II.
Topics: Humans; Achilles Tendon; Tendinopathy; Musculoskeletal Diseases; Osteotomy; Calcaneus
PubMed: 37088671
DOI: 10.1016/j.fas.2023.04.007 -
The Journal of Hand Surgery, European... Oct 2016We assessed the proximity of neurological structures to arthroscopic portals in a cadaveric study and through a systematic review. Arthroscopy was performed on ten... (Review)
Review
UNLABELLED
We assessed the proximity of neurological structures to arthroscopic portals in a cadaveric study and through a systematic review. Arthroscopy was performed on ten cadaveric wrists. Subsequently the specimens were dissected to isolate the superficial branch of the radial nerve, the dorsal branch of the ulnar nerve, the posterior interosseous nerve and the extensor tendons. We measured the distances from the nerves to common portals. For the systematic review Pubmed and EMBASE were searched on the 31 May 2014 for cadaveric studies reporting the proximity of neurological structures to any arthroscopic wrist portal. In the cadaveric study, partial injuries were seen to six extensor tendons and one posterior interosseous nerve; it was assumed this was due to creation of the portals. Seven published studies were included in the systematic review. The dorsal sensory branch of the ulnar nerve was found to be at risk by performing the 6 Ulnar, 6 Radial and ulnar midcarpal portals, the sensory branch of the radial nerve by the 1-2 and 3-4 portals and the posterior interosseous nerve by the 3-4 and 4-5 portals.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
V.
Topics: Arthroscopy; Cadaver; Dissection; Humans; Intraoperative Complications; Radial Nerve; Ulnar Nerve; Wrist Joint
PubMed: 27056276
DOI: 10.1177/1753193416641061 -
Pain Practice : the Official Journal of... Sep 2023Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) is a difficult condition to treat. Due to complex pelvic innervation, dorsal column spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has not been shown to produce... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) is a difficult condition to treat. Due to complex pelvic innervation, dorsal column spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has not been shown to produce the same effect as dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRGS) given emerging evidence suggesting that applying DRGS may result in favorable outcomes for individuals with CPP. The aim of this systematic review is to investigate the clinical use and effectiveness of DRGS for patients with CPP.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A systematic review of clinical studies demonstrating the use of DRGS for CPP. Searches were conducted using four electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Web of Science) across August and September 2022.
RESULTS
A total of nine studies comprising 65 total patients with variable pelvic pain etiologies met the inclusion criteria. The majority of subjects implanted with DRGS reported >50% mean pain reduction at variable times of follow-up. Secondary outcomes reported throughout studies including quality of life (QOL) and pain medication consumption were reported to be significantly improved.
CONCLUSIONS
Dorsal root ganglion stimulation for CPP continues to lack supportive evidence from well-designed, high-quality studies and recommendations from consensus committee experts. However, we present consistent evidence from level IV studies showing success with the use of DRGS for CPP in reducing pain symptoms along with reports of improved QOL through periods as short as 2 months to as long as 3 years. Because the available studies at this time are of low quality with a high risk of bias, we strongly recommend the facilitation of high-quality studies with larger sample sizes in order to better ascertain the utility of DRGS for this specific patient population. At the same time, from a clinical perspective, it may be reasonable and appropriate to evaluate patients for DRGS candidacy on a case-by-case basis, especially those patients who report CPP symptoms that are refractory to noninterventional measures and who may not be ideal candidates for other forms of neuromodulation.
Topics: Humans; Pain Management; Quality of Life; Neuralgia; Ganglia, Spinal; Chronic Pain; Pelvic Pain; Spinal Cord Stimulation
PubMed: 37246484
DOI: 10.1111/papr.13255 -
Neurochemistry International Dec 2023Parvalbumin is one of the calcium-binding proteins. In the spinal cord, it is mainly expressed in inhibitory neurons; in the dorsal root ganglia, it is expressed in... (Review)
Review
Parvalbumin is one of the calcium-binding proteins. In the spinal cord, it is mainly expressed in inhibitory neurons; in the dorsal root ganglia, it is expressed in proprioceptive neurons. In contrast to in the brain, weak systematization of parvalbumin-expressing neurons occurs in the spinal cord. The aim of this paper is to provide a systematic review of parvalbumin-expressing neuronal populations throughout the spinal cord and the dorsal root ganglia of mammals, regarding their mapping, co-expression with some functional markers. The data reviewed are mostly concerning rodentia species because they are predominantly presented in literature.
Topics: Animals; Calcium-Binding Proteins; Parvalbumins; Ganglia, Spinal; Spinal Cord; Neurons; Mammals
PubMed: 37967669
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuint.2023.105634 -
Pain and Therapy Jun 2022Systematic literature review. (Review)
Review
STUDY DESIGN
Systematic literature review.
OBJECTIVE
The goal of this systematic review is to assess the clinical safety and potential complications of conventional and pulsed radiofrequency ablations targeting dorsal root entry zone complex (DREZC) components in the treatment of chronic pain.
BACKGROUND
There is a growing popularity for the use of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) techniques targeting DREZC components by pain management physicians for an increasing variety of indications. To date, we lack a systematic review to describe the safety and the type of complications associated with these procedures.
METHODS
This was a systematic literature review. This systematic search was limited to peer-reviewed literature using "radiofrequency ablation" as a search keyword using PubMed's database for manuscripts published between inception and December 2020. Abstracts that involved the application of radiofrequency currents, of any modality, to DREZC components for the treatment of pain were included for full-text review. Search was limited to original data describing clinical outcomes following RFA performed for pain indications only, involving the DREZC components outlined above, in human subjects, and written in English. The primary outcomes were complications associated with conventional RFA and pulsed radiofrequency ablation (PRF). Complications were categorized as type 1 (persistent neurological deficits or other serious adverse events, defined as any event that resulted in permanent of prolonged injury; type 2 (transient neuritis or neurological deficits, or other non-neurological non-minor adverse event); type 3 (minor adverse events (e.g., headache, soreness, bruising, etc.).
RESULTS
Of the 62 selected manuscripts totaling 3157 patients, there were zero serious adverse events or persistent neurological deficits reported. A total of 36 (1.14%) transient neurological deficits, cases of transient neuritis, or non-minor adverse events like uncomplicated pneumothorax were reported. A total of 113 (3.58%) minor adverse events were reported (bruising, transient site soreness, headache).
CONCLUSIONS
This systematic review indicates that the use of RFA lesion of the DREZC for interventional pain management is very safe. There were no serious adverse effects with a sizable sample of randomized controlled trial (RCT), prospective observational, and retrospective studies.
PubMed: 35434768
DOI: 10.1007/s40122-022-00378-w -
Child's Nervous System : ChNS :... Jul 2020Objective Selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) is most commonly applied in the context of the treatment of the spastic diplegic variant of cerebral palsy (CP). Its role in... (Review)
Review
Objective Selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) is most commonly applied in the context of the treatment of the spastic diplegic variant of cerebral palsy (CP). Its role in the treatment of spasticity associated with other conditions is not well-established. We sought to review outcomes following SDR for the treatment of functionally limiting spasticity in the setting of a genetic etiology. Methods A systematic literature review was performed using the databases Ovid Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and PubMed based on the PRISMA guidelines. Articles were included if they described the application of SDR for spasticity of genetic etiology. Reported outcomes pertaining to spasticity and gross motor function following SDR were summarized. Results Five articles reporting on 16 patients (10 males, 6 females) met the inclusion criteria, of which four reported on SDR for hereditary spastic paraplegia (HSP) and four on syndromic patients or other inherited diseases, with an overall follow-up ranging from 11 to 252 months. These individuals were found to have several genetic mutations including ALS2, SPG4, and SPG3A. The mean age at the time of surgery was 14.9 years (median 10 years, range 3-37 years). Conclusions Although all patients experienced a reduction in spasticity, the long-term gross motor functional outcomes objectively assessed at last follow-up were heterogeneous. There may be a role for SDR in the context of static genetic disorders causing spasticity. Further evidence is required prior to the widespread adoption of SDR for such disorders as, based on the collective observations of this review, spasticity is consistently reduced but the long-term effect on gross motor function remains unclear.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Causality; Cerebral Palsy; Child; Child, Preschool; Female; Humans; Male; Muscle Spasticity; Rhizotomy; Spastic Paraplegia, Hereditary; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult
PubMed: 32300873
DOI: 10.1007/s00381-020-04601-x