-
Clinical Otolaryngology : Official... Nov 2022A large proportion of patients with infectious mononucleosis (IM) have abnormal liver function tests (LFT) at presentation. There is no guideline regarding the... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
A large proportion of patients with infectious mononucleosis (IM) have abnormal liver function tests (LFT) at presentation. There is no guideline regarding the management and follow-up of these patients. Some patients also have abdominal ultrasound (US) due to deranged LFT, the need for this practice is unclear. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the evidence base on LFT assessment in IM, time to resolution of derangement, and the role of abdominal US.
METHODS
A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane library was done. Two authors independently screened records for eligibility using pre-defined criteria. We included both adult and paediatric populations. Quality assessment of included studies was done.
RESULTS
A total of 3924 patients were included from 32 studies, of which LFT values were reported on 2779 patients. A combination of typical clinical features, heterophile antibodies and Epstein-Barr virus-specific antibodies were used to ascertain diagnosis. The following proportion of patients had abnormal LFT: aspartate transaminase (57%); alanine transaminase (62%); alkaline phosphatase (65%); bilirubin (16%); gamma-glutamyltransferase (41%). Reported median (interquartile range) time to resolution of LFT was 8 (6-12) weeks (n = 438). Maximum time to resolution was >6 months. Clinical hepatomegaly and splenomegaly were found in 35% and 44% of patients, respectively. Enlarged liver and spleen on US were seen in 16 of 29 and 38 of 38 of patients, respectively. There were no reports of decompensated liver disease.
CONCLUSION
Current evidence questions the need for routine assessment of LFT in immunocompetent patients presenting with IM; serial LFT assessments following initial abnormalities are not required in immunocompetent patients with subclinical derangement of LFT; routine US abdomen in IM to evaluate for derangement of LFT is not required.
Topics: Adult; Alanine Transaminase; Alkaline Phosphatase; Antibodies, Heterophile; Aspartate Aminotransferases; Bilirubin; Child; Epstein-Barr Virus Infections; Herpesvirus 4, Human; Humans; Infectious Mononucleosis; Liver Diseases; Liver Function Tests; gamma-Glutamyltransferase
PubMed: 35834363
DOI: 10.1111/coa.13965 -
Journal of the American Board of Family... 2021The accuracy of individual symptoms, signs, and several easily obtainable hematologic parameters for diagnosing infectious mononucleosis (IM) still needs to be... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The accuracy of individual symptoms, signs, and several easily obtainable hematologic parameters for diagnosing infectious mononucleosis (IM) still needs to be confirmed. Improving the diagnosis of IM based on the clinical findings could prompt physicians to identify better which patients need a diagnostic test for IM. This study performed a systematic review to determine the accuracy of symptoms, signs, and hematologic parameters in patients with suspected IM that used heterophile antibody test or viral capsid antigen tests as the reference standard.
METHODS
The PubMed database was searched for all relevant articles. Two reviewers reviewed all studies in parallel and assessed the quality of the selected studies using the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies 2 (QUADAS-2) criteria. The pooled measures of diagnostic performance were calculated by bivariate meta-analysis for each clinical finding, which included sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, the diagnostic odds ratios, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.
RESULTS
Seventeen studies were included in our final analysis. The prevalence of IM ranged from 2.1% to 80% among prospective cohort studies. The presence of splenomegaly (positive likelihood ratio [LR+], 2.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-5.51), palatal petechiae (LR+, 1.32-11.40), posterior cervical lymphadenopathy (LR+, 3.16; 95% CI, 1.45-5.20), and axillary or inguinal cervical lymphadenopathy (LR+, 3.05; 95 CI, 1.85-4.70) were moderately useful for ruling in IM. The most helpful hematologic parameters for ruling in IM include lymphocytes greater than 4 × 10/L and greater than 40% to 50%, or atypical lymphocytes greater than 40%. A combination of lymphocytes greater than 50% and atypical lymphocytes greater than 10% (LR+, 50.40; 95% CI, 8.43-162) was also found to be helpful to rule in disease. Most of the clinical findings have limited diagnostic value in ruling out the disease when absent.
CONCLUSIONS
Although most symptoms and signs were unhelpful, the likelihood of IM is appreciably increased by several examination findings. Hematologic parameters were more accurate than symptoms and signs. Since most clinical findings have limited diagnostic value in ruling out the disease, physicians should not rely on the absence of any individual symptom or clinical sign for ruling out IM.
Topics: Diagnostic Tests, Routine; Humans; Infectious Mononucleosis; Neck; Prospective Studies; ROC Curve; Sensitivity and Specificity
PubMed: 34772769
DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2021.06.210217