-
Current Eye Research Dec 2021: To perform a systematic review on the association between alcohol consumption and risk of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) using a meta-analytical approach.:... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
: To perform a systematic review on the association between alcohol consumption and risk of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) using a meta-analytical approach.: Systematic literature research was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Both categorical and dose-response meta-analysis was performed separately for early and late AMD. A fixed-effect model was used to calculate pooled effect estimates with 95% confidence interval (CI).: Seven studies were included in the analysis with 4,566 and 440 cases of early and late AMD, respectively. Compared to the nondrinkers or occasional drinkers, the pooled effect estimates for early AMD with moderate (1.19, 95% CI [1.03-1.37]) and heavy (1.24, [1.10-1.39]) alcohol consumption, but not light (0.95, [0.90-1.06]) alcohol consumption, were statistically significant. However, the pooled effect estimates for late AMD with light (1.03, [0.79-1.33]), moderate (1.13, [0.83-1.55]), and heavy (0.98, [0.63-1.53]) alcohol consumption were found to be insignificant. A linear dose-response relationship was established ( < .05) between alcohol consumption and risk of early AMD, and the pooled effect estimate for an increase in alcohol consumption of 10 g/day was 1.14 (1.08-1.21).: Moderate and heavy alcohol consumption could increase the risk of early AMD, but not late AMD, with a linear dose-response relationship.
Topics: Alcohol Drinking; Global Health; Humans; Incidence; Macular Degeneration; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors
PubMed: 34115943
DOI: 10.1080/02713683.2021.1942070 -
Ophthalmology Sep 2015A systematic review and meta-analysis of dyslipidemia and diabetic macular edema (DME). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
TOPIC
A systematic review and meta-analysis of dyslipidemia and diabetic macular edema (DME).
CLINICAL RELEVANCE
Diabetic macular edema causes impairment of vision in patients with diabetes, and dyslipidemia has been reported as a risk factor for its development. A systematic review with a meta-analysis was undertaken to examine the evidence of an association between dyslipidemia and DME.
METHODS
We defined eligibility criteria as randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies reporting on the relationship between blood lipid levels and DME. We performed a literature search in MEDLINE, PubMed, and Embase from inception to September 2014. We used the Newcastle-Ottawa scale to assess the quality of case-control, cross-sectional, and cohort studies, and the Cochrane risk of bias tool for RCTs.
RESULTS
The search strategy identified 4959 publications. After screening, we selected 21 articles for review (5 cross-sectional, 5 cohort, 7 case-control, and 4 RCTs). Meta-analysis of case-control studies revealed that mean levels of total serum cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoproteins (LDLs), and serum triglycerides (TGs) were significantly higher in patients with DME compared with those without DME (TC: 30.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 21.14-39.02; P < 0.001; LDL: 18.62; 95% CI, 5.80-31.43; P < 0.05; TG: 24.82; 95% CI, 9.21-40.42; P < 0.05). Meta-analysis of RCTs did not show significant risk in worsening of hard exudates and severity of DME in the lipid-lowering group compared with placebo (hard exudates: relative risk, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.47-2.11; P = 1.00; DME: relative risk, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.75-1.86; P = 0.48).
CONCLUSIONS
Despite evidence from the cohort studies and meta-analysis of the case-control studies suggesting a strong relationship between lipid levels and DME, this was not confirmed by the meta-analysis that included only prospective RCTs. Therefore, given the significant public health relevance of the topic, the relationship between lipid levels and DME deserves further investigation.
Topics: Case-Control Studies; Cholesterol; Cohort Studies; Cross-Sectional Studies; Databases, Factual; Diabetic Retinopathy; Dyslipidemias; Humans; Lipoproteins, LDL; Macular Edema; Triglycerides
PubMed: 26150053
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.05.011 -
International Archives of Occupational... Jan 2019Macular degeneration is a multi-factorial disease, leading cause of blindness for people over 50 years old in developed countries. To date, the knowledge on possible...
PURPOSE
Macular degeneration is a multi-factorial disease, leading cause of blindness for people over 50 years old in developed countries. To date, the knowledge on possible occupational factors involved in the development of the disease is scant.
METHOD
We performed a systematic scientific literature search on the association between macular degeneration and occupational risk factors searching the MedLine and Scopus databases.
RESULTS
We examined 158 articles and, according to the inclusion criteria, 13 peer-reviewed studies evaluating occupational risk factors for macular degeneration or reporting the frequency of the disease in specific groups of workers were included in the review. Ten on thirteen articles evaluated the presence of macular degeneration in workers exposed to solar radiation. Only one study found that non-specific history of occupational chemical exposure was associated with the disease. Two studies showed an association between macular degeneration and the general category of "blue-collar" workers, but they did not identify the specific risk factors involved.
CONCLUSIONS
To date few studies have examined occupational risk factors for macular degeneration. Nevertheless, available data indicate that long-term occupational solar radiation exposure, in particular for its blue-light component, is associated with macular degeneration in outdoor workers.
Topics: Humans; Macular Degeneration; Occupational Exposure; Occupations; Radiation Injuries; Risk Factors; Sunlight
PubMed: 30191305
DOI: 10.1007/s00420-018-1355-y -
Maturitas Jun 2016Vitamin D may be involved in ocular function in older adults, but there is no current consensus on a possible association between circulating concentrations of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Vitamin D may be involved in ocular function in older adults, but there is no current consensus on a possible association between circulating concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) and the occurrence of age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Our objective was to systematically review and quantitatively assess the association of circulating 25OHD concentration with AMD. A Medline search was conducted in November 2015, with no date limit, using the MeSH terms "Vitamin D" OR "Vitamin D deficiency" OR "Ergocalciferols" OR 'Cholecalciferol' combined with "Age-related macular degeneration" OR "Macular degeneration" OR "Retinal degeneration" OR "Macula lutea" OR "Retina". Fixed and random-effects meta-analyses were performed to compute (i) standard mean difference in 25OHD concentration between AMD and non-AMD patients; (ii) AMD risk according to circulating 25OHD concentration. Of the 243 retrieved studies, 11 observational studies-10 cross-sectional studies and 1 cohort study-met the selection criteria. The number of participants ranged from 65 to 17,045 (52-100% women), and the number with AMD ranged from 31 to 1440. Circulating 25OHD concentration was 15% lower in AMD compared with non-AMD on average. AMD was inversely associated with the highest 25OHD quintile compared with the lowest (summary odds ratio (OR)=0.83 [95%CI:0.71-0.97]), notably late AMD (summary OR=0.47 [95%CI:0.28-0.79]). Circulating 25OHD<50nmol/L was also associated with late-stage AMD (summary OR=2.18 [95%CI:1.34-3.56]), an association that did not persist when all categories of AMD were considered (summary OR=1.26 [95%CI:0.90-1.76]). In conclusion, this meta-analysis provides evidence that high 25OHD concentrations may be protective against AMD, and that 25OHD concentrations below 50nmol/L are associated with late AMD.
Topics: Cross-Sectional Studies; Humans; Macular Degeneration; Vitamin D; Vitamin D Deficiency
PubMed: 27105707
DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2016.04.002 -
Nutrients Apr 2023The Mediterranean diet (MD) is a healthy diet pattern that can prevent chronic age-related diseases, especially age-related eye diseases (AREDs) including cataract,... (Review)
Review
The Mediterranean diet (MD) is a healthy diet pattern that can prevent chronic age-related diseases, especially age-related eye diseases (AREDs) including cataract, glaucoma, age-related macular degeneration (AMD), diabetic retinopathy (DR) and dry eye syndrome (DES). In this study, we systematically reviewed studies in the literature that had reported associations between adherence to the MD and the five above-mentioned AREDs. Randomized controlled trials as well as prospective and retrospective observational studies were included; 1164 studies were identified, of which 1, 2, 9, 2 and 4 studies met our eligibility criteria for cataract, glaucoma, AMD, DR, and DES, respectively. According to these studies, higher MD adherence was associated with reduced risks of incident DR, incident AMD and progression to late AMD, but whether early and neovascular AMD could be alleviated remained to be debated. The results regarding the effects of the MD on DES were mixed, with three studies reporting an associations between MD and decreased severity or incidence of DES, whereas one study reported the opposite. No significant associations were observed between the MD and cataract or glaucoma. Generally, convincing evidence suggested a protective effect of the MD against AMD and DR. However, the evidence for cataract, glaucoma, and DES was less conclusive, and high-quality studies are needed for comprehensive evaluations of the potential benefits of MD on these eye diseases.
Topics: Humans; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Diet, Mediterranean; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A; Visual Acuity; Wet Macular Degeneration; Glaucoma; Cataract; Diabetic Retinopathy
PubMed: 37432187
DOI: 10.3390/nu15092043 -
Medicine Dec 2023A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to evaluate the efficacy and the overall safety of Faricimab compared with other anti-vascular endothelial growth... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Comparative efficacy and safety of Faricimab and other anti-VEGF therapy for age-related macular degeneration and diabetic macular edema: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
INTRODUCTION
A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to evaluate the efficacy and the overall safety of Faricimab compared with other anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGF) therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and diabetic macular edema (DME).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A systematic literature search of a comprehensive electronic database was performed to identify randomized clinical trials published from January 2013 to January 2023 for Faricimab in AMD and DME. Weighted mean differences and risk ratios were used to integrate the different studies.
RESULTS
A total of 4 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 1678 AMD patients and 3 RCTs with 20 DME patients were included in the meta-analysis.In patients with AMD, a significant difference was found in the number of injections between Faricimab and other anti-VEGF therapy (MD = -2.42, 95% CI [-3.93 to -0.90], P = .002).No significant difference was found for the change in best corrected visual acuity (BVCA), central subfoveal thickness (CST), and gaining 15 or more letters. Similarly, no significant difference was found for adverse events.In patients with DME, a significant difference was observed for CST (MD = -22.41, 95% CI [-29.95 to -14.86], P < .00001) and the number of injections(MD = -0.93, 95% CI [-1.33 to -0.54], P < .00001). No significant difference was found for BVCA and gaining 15 or more letters, and no significant difference was found for adverse events.
CONCLUSIONS
Comprehensive evidence confirms that Faricimab achieves non-inferior or even better CST improvement than other anti-VEGF therapies with extended dosing intervals, but more long-term follow-up studies are needed to support our conclusions.
Topics: Antibodies, Bispecific; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A; Macular Degeneration; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Macular Edema; Diabetes Complications; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 38115358
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000036370 -
Acta Ophthalmologica Nov 2015Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and cataract often coexist in patients and concerns that cataract surgery is associated with an increased risk of incidence or... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and cataract often coexist in patients and concerns that cataract surgery is associated with an increased risk of incidence or progression of existing AMD has been raised. This systematic review and meta-analysis is focused on presenting the evidence concerning progression of AMD in patients undergoing cataract surgery.
METHODS
We performed a systematic literature search in the PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Library and CINAHL databases. Two randomized trials and two case-control trials were identified. Quality of the studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool, data were extracted, and meta-analyses were performed. Quality of the available evidence was evaluated using the GRADE system.
RESULTS
We found that visual acuity at 6-12 months follow-up was significantly better (6.5-7.5 letters) in eyes that had undergone cataract surgery than in unoperated eyes, but the included number of subjects was small, and hence, the quality of evidence was downgraded to moderate. We did not find an increased risk of progression to exudative AMD 6-12 months after cataract surgery [RR 3.21 (0.14-75.68)], but the included number of subjects was small, and thus, the quality of the evidence was moderate.
CONCLUSION
Cataract surgery increases visual acuity without an increased risk of progression to exudative AMD, but further research with longer follow-up is encouraged.
Topics: Cataract; Cataract Extraction; Databases, Factual; Disease Progression; Humans; Risk Factors; Visual Acuity; Wet Macular Degeneration
PubMed: 25601333
DOI: 10.1111/aos.12665 -
Translational Vision Science &... Nov 2023This systematic review evaluates the safety and efficacy of ocular gene therapy using adeno-associated virus (AAV). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
This systematic review evaluates the safety and efficacy of ocular gene therapy using adeno-associated virus (AAV).
METHODS
MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched systematically for controlled or non-controlled interventional gene therapy studies using key words related to retinal diseases, gene therapy, and AAV vectors. The primary outcome measure was safety, based on ocular severe adverse events (SAEs). Secondary outcome measures evaluated efficacy of the therapy based on best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and improvements in visual sensitivity and systemic involvement following ocular delivery. Pooling was done using a DerSimonian Laird random effects model. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool, version 1.
RESULTS
Our search identified 3548 records. Of these, 80 publications met eligibility criteria, representing 28 registered clinical trials and 5 postmarket surveillance studies involving AAV gene therapy for Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA), choroideremia, Leber hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON), age-related macular degeneration (AMD), retinitis pigmentosa (RP), X-linked retinoschisis, and achromatopsia. Overall, AAV therapy vectors were associated with a cumulative incidence of at least one SAE of 8% (95% confidence intervals [CIs] of 5% to 12%). SAEs were often associated with the surgical procedure rather than the therapeutic vector itself. Poor or inconsistent reporting of adverse events (AEs) were a limitation for the meta-analysis. The proportion of patients with any improvement in BCVA and visual sensitivity was 41% (95% CIs of 31% to 51%) and 51% (95% CIs of 31% to 70%), respectively. Systemic immune involvement was associated with a cumulative incidence of 31% (95% CI = 21% to 42%).
CONCLUSIONS
AAV gene therapy vectors appear to be safe but the surgical procedure required to deliver them is associated with some risk. The large variability in efficacy can be attributed to the small number of patients treated, the heterogeneity of the population and the variability in dosage, volume, and follow-up.
TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE
This systematic review will help to inform and guide future clinical trials.
Topics: Humans; Retinal Degeneration; Dependovirus; Macular Degeneration; Retinitis Pigmentosa; Genetic Therapy
PubMed: 37982768
DOI: 10.1167/tvst.12.11.24 -
Graefe's Archive For Clinical and... Feb 2023Various treatment regimens are currently practiced in the treatment of CI-DMO (centre-involving diabetic macular oedema). In recent years, there has been a growing body... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
Various treatment regimens are currently practiced in the treatment of CI-DMO (centre-involving diabetic macular oedema). In recent years, there has been a growing body of evidence supporting a treat and extend (T&E) regimen for DMO which offers the promise of comparable visual and anatomical outcomes while reducing injection burden. This meta-analysis was hence performed to evaluate the aforementioned outcomes in the treatment of DMO. Ten studies met the inclusion criteria.
METHODS
A search of PubMed, MEDLINE, Current Contents, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases was performed. We employed the terms 'treat AND extend AND (diabetic AND macular AND edema OR oedema)' to ensure a comprehensive search. The search workflow adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.
RESULTS
The pooled analysis of the mean number of injections in 1 year for T&E-aflibercept (AFL), T&E-ranibizumab (RBZ) and collectively was 9.1 (95% CI: 7.63-10.63), 10.0 (95% CI: 9.55-10.47) and 9.6 (95% CI: 8.62-10.49), respectively. Improvements in vision at 1 year for T&E-AFL, T&E-RBZ and collectively were 6.26 (95% CI: 3.24-9.29), 7.14 (95% CI: 4.76-9.52) and 7.08 (95% CI: 5.32-8.84) letters, respectively. The improvements in central subfield thickness at 1 year for T&E-AFL, T&E-RBZ and collectively were 131.94 (95% CI: 100.29-163.60), 108.64 (95% CI: 82.82-134.46) and 121.32 (95% CI: 102.89-139.75) microns, respectively.
CONCLUSION
The meta-analysis of T&E for DMO did not show a clear advantage in reducing the number of injections compared to landmark clinical trials with pro-re-nata (PRN) treatment regimens in the first year of treatment with limited gains in visual and anatomical outcomes. However, the T&E approach offers the potential for fewer patient visits, thereby reducing treatment burden. Longer term studies on T&E with a standardised protocol would be required to assess the longevity of the vision gain in the first year despite a likely reduced treatment burden compared to the PRN trials.
Topics: Humans; Macular Edema; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A; Visual Acuity; Ranibizumab; Diabetic Retinopathy; Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor; Intravitreal Injections; Recombinant Fusion Proteins; Diabetes Mellitus
PubMed: 35906415
DOI: 10.1007/s00417-022-05770-y -
BMJ Open Ophthalmology Jun 2023This systematic review and meta-analysis provides a summary of the efficacy and safety of ranibizumab biosimilars relative to reference ranibizumab anti-vascular... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
TOPIC
This systematic review and meta-analysis provides a summary of the efficacy and safety of ranibizumab biosimilars relative to reference ranibizumab anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).
METHODS
We conducted systematic searches from January 2003 to August 2022 on Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials. We included studies reporting changes in early treatment diabetic retinopathy study-measured best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), number of patients who lost or gained more than 15 letters in BCVA from baseline, changes in retinal thickness and adverse events between treatment arms. The following studies were excluded: studies that did not report visual outcomes following biosimilar and reference ranibizumab intravitreal injections, study arms combining anti-VEGF agents with laser or steroid injections, sham injections as a control comparator, studies without English full texts and non-comparative, observational study design.
RESULTS
Five studies reported on four randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and 1544 eyes at baseline were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The studies in our systematic review found no significant differences between reference ranibizumab and ranibizumab biosimilar medications (FYB201, SB11, RanizuRel and Lupin's ranibizumab) for visual and anatomical outcomes. No significant differences were detected between biosimilar and reference ranibizumab for treatment emergent adverse events (risk ratio, RR 1.06, 95% CI (0.91 to 1.23), p=0.45, I=52%) or IOP-related adverse events with significant heterogeneity (RR 2.59, 95% CI (0.11 to 62.25), p=0.56, I=76%).
CONCLUSION
This systematic review of four RCTs demonstrated no significant difference in visual outcomes, retinal thickness outcomes, as well as meta-analysis of adverse events between biosimilar and reference ranibizumab therapies for nAMD treatment.
Topics: Humans; Ranibizumab; Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Bevacizumab; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A; Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factors; Observational Studies as Topic
PubMed: 37493655
DOI: 10.1136/bmjophth-2022-001205