-
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Apr 2016Acute asthma in children can be life-threatening and must be treated promptly in the emergency setting. Intravenous magnesium sulfate is recommended by various... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Acute asthma in children can be life-threatening and must be treated promptly in the emergency setting. Intravenous magnesium sulfate is recommended by various guidelines for cases of acute asthma that have not responded to first-line treatment with bronchodilators and steroids. The treatment has recently been shown to reduce the need for hospital admission for adults compared with placebo, but it is unclear whether it is equally effective for children.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the safety and efficacy of intravenous magnesium sulfate (IV MgSO4) in children treated for acute asthma in the emergency department (ED).
SEARCH METHODS
We identified studies by searching the Cochrane Airways Review Group Specialised Register up to 23 February 2016. We also searched ClinicalTrials.gov and reference lists of other reviews, and we contacted study authors to ask for additional information.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomised controlled trials of children treated in the ED for exacerbations of asthma if they compared any dose of IV MgSO4 with placebo.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors screened the results of the search and independently extracted data from studies meeting the inclusion criteria. We resolved disagreements through discussion and contacted study authors in cases of missing data and other uncertainties relating to the studies.We analysed dichotomous data as odds ratios and continuous data as mean differences, both using fixed-effect models. We assessed each study for risk of bias and rated the quality of evidence for each outcome with GRADE and presented the results in a 'Summary of findings' table. There was insufficient evidence to conduct the planned subgroup analyses.
MAIN RESULTS
Five studies (182 children) met the inclusion criteria, and four contributed data to at least one meta-analysis. The included studies were overall at low risk of bias, but our confidence in the evidence was generally low, mainly due to the small sample sizes. Treatment with IV MgSO4 reduced the odds of admission to hospital by 68% (odds ratio (OR) 0.32, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.14 to 0.74; children = 115; studies = 3; I(2) = 63%). This result was based on data from just three studies including 115 children. Meta-analysis for the secondary outcomes was extremely limited by paucity of data. We performed meta-analysis for the outcome 'return to the emergency department within 48 hours', which showed a very imprecise effect estimate that was not statistically significant (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.02 to 10.30; children = 85; studies = 2; I(2) = 0%). Side effects and adverse events were not consistently reported and meta-analysis was not possible, however few side effects or adverse events were reported.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
IV MgSO4 may reduce the need for hospital admission in children presenting to the ED with moderate to severe exacerbations of asthma, but the evidence is extremely limited by the number and size of studies. Few side effects of the treatment were reported, but the data were extremely limited.
Topics: Acute Disease; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Asthma; Child; Emergency Service, Hospital; Hospitalization; Humans; Injections, Intravenous; Magnesium Sulfate
PubMed: 27126744
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011050.pub2 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Dec 2014Creatine is an amino acid derivative and, when phosphorylated (phosphocreatine), is involved in replenishing adenosine triphosphate (ATP) via the creatine kinase... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Creatine is an amino acid derivative and, when phosphorylated (phosphocreatine), is involved in replenishing adenosine triphosphate (ATP) via the creatine kinase reaction. Cells obtain creatine from a diet rich in fish, meat, or dairy and by endogenous synthesis from the amino acids arginine, glycine, and methionine in an approximate 50:50 ratio. Animal studies have shown that creatine may provide fetal neuroprotection when given to the mother through her diet in pregnancy. It is important to assess whether maternally administered creatine in human pregnancy (at times of known, suspected, or potential fetal compromise) may offer neuroprotection to the fetus and may accordingly reduce the risk of adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes, such as cerebral palsy and associated impairments and disabilities arising from fetal brain injury.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effects of creatine when used for neuroprotection of the fetus.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (30 November 2014).
SELECTION CRITERIA
We planned to include all published, unpublished, and ongoing randomised trials and quasi-randomised trials. We planned to include studies reported as abstracts only as well as full-text manuscripts. Trials using a cross-over or cluster-randomised design were not eligible for inclusion.We planned to include trials comparing creatine given to women in pregnancy for fetal neuroprotection (regardless of the route, timing, dose, or duration of administration) with placebo, no treatment, or with an alternative agent aimed at providing fetal neuroprotection. We also planned to include comparisons of different regimens for administration of creatine.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We identified no completed or ongoing randomised controlled trials.
MAIN RESULTS
We found no randomised controlled trials for inclusion in this review.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
As we did not identify any randomised controlled trials for inclusion in this review, we are unable to comment on implications for practice. Although evidence from animal studies has supported a fetal neuroprotective role for creatine when administered to the mother during pregnancy, no trials assessing creatine in pregnant women for fetal neuroprotection have been published to date. If creatine is established as safe for the mother and her fetus, research efforts should first be directed towards randomised trials comparing creatine with either no intervention (ideally using a placebo), or with alternative agents aimed at providing fetal neuroprotection (including magnesium sulphate for the very preterm infant). If appropriate, these trials should then be followed by studies comparing different creatine regimens (dosage and duration of exposure). Such trials should be high quality and adequately powered to evaluate maternal and infant short and longer-term outcomes (including neurodevelopmental disabilities such as cerebral palsy), and should consider utilisation/costs of health care.
Topics: Brain Diseases; Creatine; Female; Fetal Diseases; Humans; Neuroprotective Agents; Pregnancy
PubMed: 25523279
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010846.pub2 -
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology... 2023This study evaluated the efficacy of epidurally administered magnesium associated with local anesthetics on postoperative pain control. (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
This study evaluated the efficacy of epidurally administered magnesium associated with local anesthetics on postoperative pain control.
METHODS
The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO as CRD42021231910. Literature searches were conducted on Medline, Cochrane, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials comparing epidural administration of magnesium added to local anesthetics for postoperative pain in elective surgical adult patients. Primary outcomes were the time to the first Postoperative (PO) Analgesic Request (TFAR), 24-hour postoperative opioid consumption, and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores at the first six and 24 postoperative hours. Secondary outcomes included Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV), pruritus, and shivering. Quality of evidence was assessed using GRADE criteria.
RESULTS
Seventeen studies comparing epidural were included. Effect estimates are described as weighted Mean Differences (MD) and 95% Confidence Intervals (95% CI) for the main outcomes: TFAR (MD = 72.4 min; 95% CI = 10.22-134.58 min; p < 0.001; I = 99.8%; GRADE: very low); opioid consumption (MD = -7.2 mg (95% CI = -9.30 - -5.09; p < 0.001; I = 98%; GRADE: very low). VAS pain scores within the first six PO hours (VAS) (MD = -1.01 cm; 95% CI = -1.40-0.64 cm; p < 0.001; I = 88%; GRADE: very low), at 24 hours (MD = -0.56 cm; 95% CI = -1.14-0.01 cm; p = 0.05; I = 97%; GRADE: very low).
CONCLUSIONS
Magnesium sulfate delayed TFAR and decreased 24-hour opioid consumption and early postoperative pain intensity. However, imprecision and inconsistency pervaded meta-analyses, causing very low certainty of effect estimates.
Topics: Humans; Anesthetics, Local; Magnesium Sulfate; Analgesics, Opioid; Magnesium; Pain, Postoperative
PubMed: 36087812
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjane.2022.08.005 -
The Journal of Maternal-fetal &... Nov 2014Asthma is the most common chronic disease of childhood and the leading cause of childhood morbidity. When uncontrolled, asthma can place significant limits on daily... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Asthma is the most common chronic disease of childhood and the leading cause of childhood morbidity. When uncontrolled, asthma can place significant limits on daily life, and is sometimes fatal. The use of magnesium sulphate (MgSO4) is one of numerous treatment options available during acute severe asthma in children. The efficacy of intravenous, or inhaled MgSO4 has been demonstrated, while little is known about the actual clinical use of either intravenous (IV) or inhaled MgSO4.
OBJECTIVE
To assess the effectiveness of intravenous (IV) and/or inhaled MgSO4 on hospital admissions and pulmonary function in children with asthma. This systematic review assessed the best available evidence for the use of either intravenous or inhaled MgSO4 in children with acute asthma. Magnesium deficiency is a common electrolyte disorder in children with acute severe asthma. Several authors reported that IV magnesium was effective in the treatment of moderate to acute asthma in children but evidence for nebulised magnesium was insufficient. In addition, it is used in severe, progressed cases to prevent respiratory failure and/or admission to the intensive care unit. It has bronchodilating and anti-inflammatory effects and modulates ion transport and influences intracellular calcium concentration. Intravenous MgSO4 therapy helps in achieving earlier improvement in clinical signs and symptoms of asthma, e.g. respiratory function and significantly reduced hospital admission, in children with acute severe asthma. The role of nebulised MgSO4 in asthmatic children requires further investigation.
CONCLUSION
According to the previous studies, the author recommends the use of intravenous MgSO4 as a safe and effective adjunct to conventional bronchodilator therapy in acute severe asthma in children.
Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Administration, Intravenous; Asthma; Bronchodilator Agents; Child; Health; Humans; Magnesium; Magnesium Sulfate; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 24345031
DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2013.876620 -
JBI Evidence Synthesis Mar 2021The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the effectiveness of intravenous magnesium sulfate when used to attenuate hemodynamic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the effectiveness of intravenous magnesium sulfate when used to attenuate hemodynamic fluctuations associated with the creation of pneumoperitoneum in adults undergoing laparoscopic surgery.
INTRODUCTION
Laparoscopic surgery has gained popularity as a result of improved patient outcomes postoperatively, but pneumoperitoneum alters the patient's physiology and hemodynamic profile during the intraoperative period. Magnesium sulfate is a nonopioid agent known for its ability to blunt the physiologic sympathetic response associated with exposure to noxious stimuli. Magnesium sulfate may be efficacious in promoting anesthetic management that optimizes a patient's cardiopulmonary function while minimzing opioid use.
INCLUSION CRITERIA
Studies with participants at least 18 years old undergoing any elective laparoscopic surgery using pneumoperitoneum with CO2 insufflation were included. Studies were excluded if patients were being treated for pheochromocytoma. Studies eligible for inclusion employed any intravenous dosing strategy of magnesium sulfate, administered at any point in the perioperative period for the purpose of blunting the sympathetic response to creation of a pneumoperitoneum. The comparator utilized was normal saline.
METHODS
A systematic search of MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, Trip Database, MedNar, Grey Literature Report, ClinicalTrials.gov, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses was conducted to identify both published and unpublished studies. The search was limited to studies written in the English language and performed on human subjects. Studies were selected for review based on inclusion criteria and were appraised by two reviewers using the appropriate JBI standardized appraisal tool. Data extraction was performed for all outcome variables. Data were pooled using the JBI System for the Unified Management, Assessment and Review of Information. Mean differences (95% confidence interval) were calculated for all continuous variables. Meta-analysis using a fixed effects model was performed at various time points for heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and mean arterial pressure. Standard GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) evidence assessment was also reported.
RESULTS
A total of six randomized controlled trials were included in the review. Meta-analysis of data for biophysical parameters (heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and mean arterial pressure) at five minutes, 10 to 15 minutes, 30 minutes after pneumoperitoneum, and at the end of surgery showed a consistent reduction in the magnesium groups compared to placebo. Support for all outcome variables was determined to be high using the GRADE criteria.
CONCLUSION
The administration of magnesium sulfate consistently demonstrated improved hemodynamic measurements during laparoscopic surgery. All doses administered in the included studies proved beneficial compared to placebo. Magnesium sulfate should be considered as an adjunct agent in laparoscopic surgery to blunt the sympathetic nervous system response to surgical stimulation. The quality of the included studies was high, but small sample sizes and selection of healthy participants may limit the generalizability of the results. The use of magnesium sulfate may have improved effects on patients with significant health comorbidities, but the limitations of the included studies related to sample demographics make the evidence inconclusive.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER
PROSPERO (CRD42019139991).
Topics: Administration, Intravenous; Adolescent; Adult; Hemodynamics; Humans; Insufflation; Laparoscopy; Magnesium Sulfate
PubMed: 33074990
DOI: 10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00414 -
Headache Nov 2019Non-traumatic headaches comprise up to 4% of all emergency department (ED) visits. Current practice is moving toward multimodal analgesia regimens that limit narcotic...
INTRODUCTION
Non-traumatic headaches comprise up to 4% of all emergency department (ED) visits. Current practice is moving toward multimodal analgesia regimens that limit narcotic use.
OBJECTIVE
The objective of this systematic review is to address the following research question: In patients with non-traumatic headaches (Population), does administration of intravenous magnesium sulfate (Intervention) compared to placebo, corticosteroids, dopamine antagonists, ergot alkaloids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), triptans, or usual care result in better pain control, lower rate of recurrence at 24 hours, lower requirements for rescue analgesia, and less adverse medication effects (Outcomes)?
METHODS
Scholarly databases and relevant bibliographies were searched, as were clinical trial registries and relevant conference proceedings to limit publication bias. Studies were not limited by date, language, or publication status. Inclusion criteria were: (1) randomized clinical trial (RCT), (2) patients age ≥18 years, (3) non-traumatic headache, (4) patients treated in ED or an outpatient acute care treatment center, and (5) magnesium sulfate administered intravenously (IV). Eligible comparison groups included: placebo, conventional therapy, dopamine antagonist, NSAID, corticosteroid, ergot alkaloid, or triptans.
RESULTS
Out of 4018 identified references, 7 RCTs (545 participants) that treated migraine headaches (n = 6) and benign non-traumatic headaches (n = 1) met inclusion criteria. Pain intensity was improved with magnesium sulfate vs comparators at 60-120 minutes, but not at earlier time points. Result for the endpoint of pain reduction by 50% were conflicting as 3 studies reported that headache was improved, unchanged, and less with magnesium sulfate. Complete pain relief was improved with magnesium sulfate in 1 study, and in the migraine with aura (MA) subgroup in another. The need for rescue analgesia at any point was improved with magnesium sulfate in 1 study, and in the MA subgroup in another. Twenty-four-hour headache recurrence was improved with magnesium sulfate in 1 study, but unchanged in a second. The intended meta-analysis was not performed due to the clinical heterogeneity among studies.
CONCLUSION
While we cannot draw a firm conclusion on the efficacy or benefit of intravenous magnesium sulfate in the treatment of acute non-traumatic headaches, the existing evidence indicates potential benefits in pain control beyond 1 hour, aura duration, and need for rescue analgesia.
Topics: Administration, Intravenous; Analgesics, Non-Narcotic; Emergency Service, Hospital; Headache; Humans; Magnesium Sulfate; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 31566727
DOI: 10.1111/head.13648 -
Medicine Nov 2018The impact of magnesium sulfate on hemodynamic responses during laparoscopic cholecystectomy remains controversial. We conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
The impact of magnesium sulfate on hemodynamic responses during laparoscopic cholecystectomy remains controversial. We conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the influence of magnesium sulfate on hemodynamic responses for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
METHODS
We search PubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases through June 2018 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of magnesium sulfate on hemodynamic responses for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Meta-analysis is performed using the random-effect model.
RESULTS
Four RCTs involving 208 patients are included in the meta-analysis. Overall, compared with control group in laparoscopic cholecystectomy, intravenous magnesium sulfate is associated with systolic blood pressure at 30 minutes [Std. MD = -1.34; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = -1.86 to -0.82; P < .00001], diastolic blood pressure at 30 minutes (Std. MD = -1.40; 95% CI = -1.86 to -0.94; P < .00001), mean arterial pressure at 30 minutes (Std. MD = -1.19; 95% CI = -1.91 to -0.46; P = .001), systolic blood pressure at 10 minutes (Std. MD = -1.61; 95% CI = -2.08 to -1.13; P < .00001), diastolic blood pressure at 10 minutes (Std. MD = -1.54; 95% CI = -2.68 to -0.40; P = .008), heart rate at 30 minutes (Std. MD = -2.09; 95% CI = -2.87 to -1.32; P < .00001), but results in prolonged extubation time (Std. MD = 0.96; 95% CI = 0.18-1.74; P = .02).
CONCLUSION
Magnesium sulfate can reduce blood pressure, but with the increase in extubation time for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Topics: Adult; Blood Pressure; Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic; Female; Heart Rate; Hemostasis, Surgical; Humans; Magnesium Sulfate; Male; Middle Aged; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Renin-Angiotensin System; Treatment Outcome; Vasodilator Agents
PubMed: 30407279
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012747 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Oct 2023Magnesium sulphate is the drug of choice for the prevention and treatment of women with eclampsia. Regimens for administration of this drug have evolved over the years,... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Magnesium sulphate is the drug of choice for the prevention and treatment of women with eclampsia. Regimens for administration of this drug have evolved over the years, but there is no clarity on the comparative benefits or harm of alternative regimens. This is an update of a review first published in 2010.
OBJECTIVES
To assess if one magnesium sulphate regimen is better than another when used for the care of women with pre-eclampsia or eclampsia, or both, to reduce the risk of severe morbidity and mortality for the woman and her baby.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register, ClinicalTrials.gov, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (29 April 2022), and reference lists of retrieved studies.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomised trials and cluster-randomised trials comparing different regimens for administration of magnesium sulphate used in women with pre-eclampsia or eclampsia, or both. Comparisons included different dose regimens, intramuscular versus intravenous route for maintenance therapy, and different durations of therapy. We excluded studies with quasi-random or cross-over designs. We included abstracts of conference proceedings if compliant with the trustworthiness assessment.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
For this update, two review authors assessed trials for inclusion, performed risk of bias assessment, and extracted data. We checked data for accuracy. We assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach.
MAIN RESULTS
For this update, a total of 16 trials (3020 women) met our inclusion criteria: four trials (409 women) compared regimens for women with eclampsia, and 12 trials (2611 women) compared regimens for women with pre-eclampsia. Most of the included trials had small sample sizes and were conducted in low- and middle-income countries. Eleven trials reported adequate randomisation and allocation concealment. Blinding of participants and clinicians was not possible in most trials. The included studies were for the most part at low risk of attrition and reporting bias. Treatment of women with eclampsia (four comparisons) One trial compared a loading dose-alone regimen with a loading dose plus maintenance dose regimen (80 women). It is uncertain whether either regimen has an effect on the risk of recurrence of convulsions or maternal death (very low-certainty evidence). One trial compared a lower-dose regimen with standard-dose regimen over 24 hours (72 women). It is uncertain whether either regimen has an effect on the risk of recurrence of convulsion, severe morbidity, perinatal death, or maternal death (very low-certainty evidence). One trial (137 women) compared intravenous (IV) versus standard intramuscular (IM) maintenance regimen. It is uncertain whether either route has an effect on recurrence of convulsions, death of the baby before discharge (stillbirth and neonatal death), or maternal death (very low-certainty evidence). One trial (120 women) compared a short maintenance regimen with a standard (24 hours after birth) maintenance regimen. It is uncertain whether the duration of the maintenance regimen has an effect on recurrence of convulsions, severe morbidity, or side effects such as nausea and respiratory failure. A short maintenance regimen may reduce the risk of flushing when compared to a standard 24 hours maintenance regimen (risk ratio (RR) 0.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.08 to 0.93; 1 trial, 120 women; low-certainty evidence). Many of our prespecified critical outcomes were not reported in the included trials. Prevention of eclampsia for women with pre-eclampsia (five comparisons) Two trials (462 women) compared loading dose alone with loading dose plus maintenance therapy. Low-certainty evidence suggests an uncertain effect with either regimen on the risk of eclampsia (RR 2.00, 95% CI 0.61 to 6.54; 2 trials, 462 women) or perinatal death (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.19 to 1.36; 2 trials, 462 women). One small trial (17 women) compared an IV versus IM maintenance regimen for 24 hours. It is uncertain whether IV or IM maintenance regimen has an effect on eclampsia or stillbirth (very low-certainty evidence). Four trials (1713 women) compared short postpartum maintenance regimens with continuing for 24 hours after birth. Low-certainty evidence suggests there may be a wide range of benefit or harm between groups regarding eclampsia (RR 1.99, 95% CI 0.18 to 21.87; 4 trials, 1713 women). Low-certainty evidence suggests there may be little or no effect on severe morbidity (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.29; 2 trials, 1233 women) or side effects such as respiratory depression (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.25 to 2.61; 2 trials, 1424 women). Three trials (185 women) compared a higher-dose maintenance regimen versus a lower-dose maintenance regimen. It is uncertain whether either regimen has an effect on eclampsia (very low-certainty evidence). Low-certainty evidence suggests that a higher-dose maintenance regimen has little or no effect on side effects when compared to a lower-dose regimen (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.01; 1 trial 62 women). One trial (200 women) compared a maintenance regimen by continuous infusion versus a serial IV bolus regimen. It is uncertain whether the duration of the maintenance regimen has an effect on eclampsia, side effects, perinatal death, maternal death, or other neonatal morbidity (very low-certainty evidence). Many of our prespecified critical outcomes were not reported in the included trials.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Despite the number of trials evaluating various magnesium sulphate regimens for eclampsia prophylaxis and treatment, there is still no compelling evidence that one particular regimen is more effective than another. Well-designed randomised controlled trials are needed to answer this question.
Topics: Humans; Pregnancy; Infant, Newborn; Female; Pre-Eclampsia; Magnesium Sulfate; Eclampsia; Perinatal Death; Stillbirth; Maternal Death; Seizures
PubMed: 37815037
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007388.pub3 -
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Dec 2023Permissive hypotension, defined as mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 60-70 mm Hg, has been regarded as favorable among surgeons performing rhinoplasty. Furthermore,... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE
Permissive hypotension, defined as mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 60-70 mm Hg, has been regarded as favorable among surgeons performing rhinoplasty. Furthermore, management of blood pressure has been shown to promote greater visualization of the surgical field and decrease postoperative complications, such as ecchymosis and edema. While multiple therapies have been utilized to achieve permissive hypotension, it remains unclear how modalities compare in terms of safety and efficacy. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review to better understand the specific modalities and associated outcomes in managing blood pressure during rhinoplasty.
METHODS
A systematic literature review was conducted in order to identify and assess therapeutics utilized in achieving permissive hypotension during rhinoplasty. Variables collected included year of publication, journal, article title, organization of study, patient sample, treatment modality, associated outcomes (i.e., intraoperative bleeding, edema, and ecchymosis), adverse events, complications, and satisfaction. Articles were then categorized by the level of evidence as set forth by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons. Any conflicts were resolved through discussion and full-text review among co-authors. Of note, the search was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. No funding was required to conduct this review of the literature.
RESULTS
Initial review yielded sixty-five articles. Title and abstract review followed by standardized application of inclusion and exclusion criteria resulted in a total of ten studies for analysis. Articles discussed multiple therapies for management of blood pressure during rhinoplasty, including dexmedetomidine, dexamethasone, gabapentin, labetalol, nitroglycerine, remifentanil, magnesium sulfate, clonidine, and metoprolol. Overall, intraoperative bleeding, as well as postoperative ecchymosis and edema were reduced when MAP was controlled.
CONCLUSION
Given its intra- and postoperative benefits, permissive hypotension can be leveraged to improve outcomes in rhinoplasty. This study presents an updated comprehensive review of various modalities used to achieve permission hypotension in rhinoplasty. Future studies should explore how comorbidities may impact choice of treatment regimen among patients undergoing rhinoplasty.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Topics: Humans; Hemorrhage; Hypotension; Rhinoplasty; Treatment Outcome; Postoperative Complications
PubMed: 36877227
DOI: 10.1007/s00266-023-03298-y -
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Dec 2014Atrial fibrillation after thoracic surgery is frequent and increases morbidity and mortality. A number of trials have investigated medical prophylaxis for the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Atrial fibrillation after thoracic surgery is frequent and increases morbidity and mortality. A number of trials have investigated medical prophylaxis for the prevention of atrial fibrillation after surgery for lung cancer. However, the literature is diverse and hence difficult to review. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of reducing the risk of postoperative atrial fibrillation by the use of medical prophylaxis in patients undergoing surgery for lung cancer.
METHODS
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials investigating prophylactic medical interventions to reduce the risk of postoperative atrial fibrillation was performed.
RESULTS
A total number of 10 trials were identified. A significant reduction in the risk of postoperative atrial fibrillation was found with a relative risk of 0.53 (95% confidence interval, 0.42 to 0.67) and a number needed-to-treat of 8.5 (95% confidence interval, 6.4 to 13.3). Amiodarone was found to be the most effective prophylactic agent with a relative risk of 0.32 (95% confidence interval, 0.19 to 0.50) and a number needed-to-treat of 4.8 (95% confidence interval, 3.7 to 7.6) and regarded as safe, with no severe adverse events registered. The risk of atrial fibrillation was overall reduced from 25.1% to 13.4% (p < 0.001) and for amiodarone as a single therapy from 30.4% to 9.6% (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
Medical prophylaxis with calcium-channel blockers, magnesium sulfate, or amiodarone significantly reduces the risk of developing atrial fibrillation after lung reduction surgery. However, amiodarone and magnesium sulfate were the most effective and safest drugs causing no increased risk of adverse events.
Topics: Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Pneumonectomy; Postoperative Complications; Risk Factors
PubMed: 25283696
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.06.069