-
The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry Feb 2017Currently, which type of suprastructure is preferred when fabricating implant-retained craniofacial prostheses is unknown. (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Review
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM
Currently, which type of suprastructure is preferred when fabricating implant-retained craniofacial prostheses is unknown.
PURPOSE
The purpose of this systematic review was to identify the best retention system (bar-clips versus magnets) for implant-retained craniofacial prostheses.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
This systematic review was conducted and reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. A systematic search of Medline/PubMed and Web of Science databases for clinical trials was conducted on implant-retained craniofacial prostheses published between 2005 and 2015. English-language studies that directly compared different types of retention systems or presented information on implant survival, periimplant soft tissue reactions, and prosthetic complications were included. Nonclinical studies were excluded to eliminate bias.
RESULTS
A total to 173 studies were identified, of which 10 satisfied the inclusion criteria. In total, 492 participants were included in these studies. Four selected studies displayed detailed information with regard to the number of implant failures according to the retention system. As reported, 29 (18.2%) of 159 implants with magnets failed, whereas 25 (31.6%) of 79 implants with bars failed. Overall auricular superstructures showed the highest survival (99.08%). In addition, 55.4% of all participants in the selected studies showed grade 0 of periimplant soft tissue reactions.
CONCLUSIONS
A systematic search for clinical studies resulted in few studies with a short-term follow-up and small number of participants. The limited data collected indicated that magnets show fewer complications than bar superstructures; however, no hard conclusions could be drawn. Further research, preferably in the form of clinical trials, is needed to validate these findings.
Topics: Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported; Humans; Magnets; Maxillofacial Prosthesis; Prosthesis Retention
PubMed: 27666496
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.05.020 -
Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society 2020To evaluate the survival rate, tissue response, and patient satisfaction of different attachments used in implant overdenture. (Review)
Review
AIM
To evaluate the survival rate, tissue response, and patient satisfaction of different attachments used in implant overdenture.
SETTINGS AND DESIGN
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Electronic search of peer-review articles published between 2001 and 2019 assessing the attachments used for implant-supported overdentures was done according to PRISMA Guidelies. The review evaluated sixteen articles related to survival of the attachments, the reaction of the soft and hard tissues along with repair and maintenance of the attachments, and overall performance of the overdenture attachments.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED
There is statistically significant heterogeneity (Q =374.7403, df = 15, and < 0.0001). The statistics of fixed-effect model reported an MD of - 0.0880 (95% CI = -0.1536; 0.0225).
RESULT
The review evaluated the 16 articles that met with the inclusion and search criteria. The studies were the combination of bar and ball attachments and their subtypes, magnetic and bar attachments, and locator in combination with other attachments. The meta-analysis of combined 16 studies reported acceptable heterogeneity among 16 studies (I 2 = 96%) and reported to be statistically significant ( < 0.01).
CONCLUSION
The survival rate of attachments was in the range of 95.8%-97.5% for bar, 96.2%-100% for ball, 90%-92% for magnet and locator attachments were in the range of 97% after a mean follow-up period of 3 years. The bar attachments reported moderate tissue reaction in the form of mucosal changes, gingival inflammation, and bone resorption. The locator attachments require higher maintenance and repair. The magnetic attachments produce higher bone resorption and readily displace under functional force. Patient satisfaction and compliance was higher for ball, locator, and bar attachments as well as low for magnetic attachment. Thus, the ball and locator attachments excellently perform in terms of survival rate, tissue response, and patient satisfaction.
PubMed: 33223695
DOI: 10.4103/jips.jips_368_19 -
Saudi Medical Journal Aug 2021To systematically review the occurrence of magnet or receiver/stimulator displacement following cochlear implant (CI) placement complication and evaluate the existing...
OBJECTIVES
To systematically review the occurrence of magnet or receiver/stimulator displacement following cochlear implant (CI) placement complication and evaluate the existing literature on this topic.
METHODS
A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Virtual Health Library (VHL), and Cochrane Library. Original studies reporting cases of magnet or receiver-stimulator migration occurring as a complication after CI placement were included. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the National Institutes of Health Quality Assessment Tool for observational studies and CARE checklist for case studies.
RESULTS
A total of 36 studies, including 6469 patients, were included. Magnet migration was reported in 82 (1.3%) patients, while receiver/stimulator was reported in 4 (0.1%) cases. The cause of magnet migration was identified in 78 cases; MRI-induced movement was the most frequently reported cause (n=43, 55.1%), followed by head trauma (n=25, 32.1%). A total of 20 studies involving 35 patients with magnet migration performed skull radiography to diagnose magnet migration. Revision/exploratory surgery with surgical repositioning or replacement was the most frequent management procedure (n=46).
CONCLUSIONS
Further research on magnet pocket design and standard protocols for MRI in CI users is needed. Early diagnosis of magnet migration and instant referral to specialized CI centers is necessary for proper management and prevention of major complications. PROSPERO REG. NO. CRD: 42020204514.
Topics: Cochlear Implantation; Cochlear Implants; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Magnets; Reoperation
PubMed: 34344804
DOI: 10.15537/smj.2021.42.8.20210294 -
Pediatrics in Review Oct 2015Esophageal and aspirated foreign bodies have important clinical significance, and both should be considered carefully when the history or physical examination findings... (Review)
Review
Esophageal and aspirated foreign bodies have important clinical significance, and both should be considered carefully when the history or physical examination findings raise sufficient suspicion. The published evidence regarding the diagnosis and management of foreign body ingestion or aspiration is weighted disproportionately with observational studies, case controls, expert opinion, and systematic reviews. Most of the publications would receive a categorization of C (observational studies including case-control and cohort design) and D (expert opinion, case reports, and clinical reasoning). One of the few prospective studies examining the diagnostic evaluation of foreign body aspiration in children could be considered level B evidence (randomized clinical trials, systematic reviews, or diagnostic studies with minor limitations). This study found that the medical history is the most important predictive part of the evaluation. There is evidence for considering bronchoscopy if there is significant history suggestive of foreign body aspiration, even in the setting of normal physical examination findings. (28). Most ingested foreign bodies spontaneously pass without incident. However, special attention should be paid to objects in the esophagus as well as to batteries and magnets. Based on a systematic review of the literature (level B evidence) and the potential for rapid and life-threatening damage, batteries in the esophagus should be removed immediately. (10) Other objects, such as coins, may be observed for passage in an asymptomatic patient. In addition, given the high risk of significant complications, ingestion of high-powered magnets should be quickly and carefully evaluated. Although single magnets are likely to pass without complication, multiple magnets or magnets ingested with other metal objects can cause significant damage and should be removed if there is any concern for mural entrapment, bowel perforation, or failure to progress. (10)(16)(17)(18)(19). Lastly, another systematic review of the literature (level B evidence) about the aspiration of food objects in children suggests that this is a significant public health concern with potentially devastating consequences. Despite clear legislation and regulation by the Consumer Product Safety Commission regarding toys, there is no similar regulation of high-risk foods. The data suggest that there is opportunity for improvement in legislation about the production and packaging of high-risk items as well as in the education of caregivers. (22)
Topics: Child, Preschool; Esophagus; Foreign Bodies; Humans; Respiratory System
PubMed: 26430203
DOI: 10.1542/pir.36-10-430 -
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology 2023Magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy (MCCE) is a non-invasive, painless, comfortable, and safe equipment to diagnose gastrointestinal diseases (GID), partially... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy (MCCE) is a non-invasive, painless, comfortable, and safe equipment to diagnose gastrointestinal diseases (GID), partially overcoming the shortcomings of conventional endoscopy and wireless capsule endoscopy (WCE). With advancements in technology, the main technical parameters of MCCE have continuously been improved, and MCCE has become more intelligent.
OBJECTIVES
The aim of this systematic review was to summarize the research progress of MCCE and artificial intelligence (AI) in the diagnosis and treatment of GID.
DATA SOURCES AND METHODS
We conducted a systematic search of PubMed and EMBASE for published studies on GID detection of MCCE, physical factors related to MCCE imaging quality, the application of AI in aiding MCCE, and its additional functions. We synergistically reviewed the included studies, extracted relevant data, and made comparisons.
RESULTS
MCCE was confirmed to have the same performance as conventional gastroscopy and WCE in detecting common GID, while it lacks research in detecting early gastric cancer (EGC). The body position and cleanliness of the gastrointestinal tract are the main factors affecting imaging quality. The applications of AI in screening intestinal diseases have been comprehensive, while in the detection of common gastric diseases such as ulcers, it has been developed. MCCE can perform some additional functions, such as observations of drug behavior in the stomach and drug damage to the gastric mucosa. Furthermore, it can be improved to perform a biopsy.
CONCLUSION
This comprehensive review showed that the MCCE technology has made great progress, but studies on GID detection and treatment by MCCE are in the primary stage. Further studies are required to confirm the performance of MCCE.
PubMed: 37900007
DOI: 10.1177/17562848231206991 -
American Journal of Otolaryngology 2022Cochlear implant (CI) migration due to head trauma is a rare complication, and there is limited data summarizing this topic. This review seeks to provide a more... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
Cochlear implant (CI) migration due to head trauma is a rare complication, and there is limited data summarizing this topic. This review seeks to provide a more comprehensive understanding of risk factors, clinical presentations, diagnosis, and intervention strategies for traumatic CI displacement.
METHODS
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Protocol was followed using the PubMed and MED-LINE databases from 2000 to 2021, with manual cross-checks of reference lists of identified articles for additional relevant studies. The keywords used for database searches included "cochlear implant", "migration", "displacement", "extrusion" and "head trauma". All full-text articles available in English were screened, including single case presentations. Abstracts, commentaries, and publications deemed outside the scope of our study aims were excluded from review.
RESULTS
After the removal of duplicate articles, a total of 152 articles were screened. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 11 articles were included in the review. Due to heterogeneity of the available literature, a qualitative synthesis was employed to integrate results by identifying common themes among the relevant studies.
CONCLUSIONS
The incidence of traumatic CI migration is extremely low and can be due to receiver-stimulator displacement, magnet displacement, or electrode extrusion. Migration occurred anywhere from 3 months to 26 years after implantation, suggesting that risk of migration from head trauma does not depend solely on time from implantation. There are several methods for repairing migrated CI, but there is limited data comparing operative techniques, specifically in the prevention of traumatic CI migration.
Topics: Cochlear Implantation; Cochlear Implants; Craniocerebral Trauma; Humans
PubMed: 35988364
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2022.103553 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Sep 2014Anterior open bite occurs when there is a lack of vertical overlap of the upper and lower incisors. The aetiology is multifactorial including: oral habits, unfavourable... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Anterior open bite occurs when there is a lack of vertical overlap of the upper and lower incisors. The aetiology is multifactorial including: oral habits, unfavourable growth patterns, enlarged lymphatic tissue with mouth breathing. Several treatments have been proposed to correct this malocclusion, but interventions are not supported by strong scientific evidence.
OBJECTIVES
The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate orthodontic and orthopaedic treatments to correct anterior open bite in children.
SEARCH METHODS
The following databases were searched: the Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register (to 14 February 2014); the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL)(The Cochrane Library 2014, Issue 1); MEDLINE via OVID (1946 to 14 February 2014); EMBASE via OVID (1980 to 14 February 2014); LILACS via BIREME Virtual Health Library (1982 to 14 February 2014); BBO via BIREME Virtual Health Library (1980 to 14 February 2014); and SciELO (1997 to 14 February 2014). We searched for ongoing trials via ClinicalTrials.gov (to 14 February 2014). Chinese journals were handsearched and the bibliographies of papers were retrieved.
SELECTION CRITERIA
All randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials of orthodontic or orthopaedic treatments or both to correct anterior open bite in children.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently assessed the eligibility of all reports identified. Risk ratios (RRs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for dichotomous data. The continuous data were expressed as described by the author.
MAIN RESULTS
Three randomised controlled trials were included comparing: effects of Frankel's function regulator-4 (FR-4) with lip-seal training versus no treatment; repelling-magnet splints versus bite-blocks; and palatal crib associated with high-pull chincup versus no treatment.The study comparing repelling-magnet splints versus bite-blocks could not be analysed because the authors interrupted the treatment earlier than planned due to side effects in four of ten patients.FR-4 associated with lip-seal training (RR = 0.02 (95% CI 0.00 to 0.38)) and removable palatal crib associated with high-pull chincup (RR = 0.23 (95% CI 0.11 to 0.48)) were able to correct anterior open bite.No study described: randomisation process, sample size calculation, there was not blinding in the cephalometric analysis and the two studies evaluated two interventions at the same time. These results should be therefore viewed with caution.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
There is weak evidence that the interventions FR-4 with lip-seal training and palatal crib associated with high-pull chincup are able to correct anterior open bite. Given that the trials included have potential bias, these results must be viewed with caution. Recommendations for clinical practice cannot be made based only on the results of these trials. More randomised controlled trials are needed to elucidate the interventions for treating anterior open bite.
Topics: Adolescent; Child; Humans; Malocclusion; Open Bite; Orthodontic Appliances, Functional; Orthodontic Appliances, Removable; Orthodontics, Corrective; Orthopedic Procedures; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 25247473
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005515.pub3 -
Skeletal Radiology May 2018To give a systematic overview of current diagnostic imaging options for assessment of the distal tibio-fibular syndesmosis. (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
To give a systematic overview of current diagnostic imaging options for assessment of the distal tibio-fibular syndesmosis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A systematic literature search across the following sources was performed: PubMed, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, and SpringerLink. Forty-two articles were included and subdivided into three groups: group one consists of studies using conventional radiographs (22 articles), group two includes studies using computed tomography (CT) scans (15 articles), and group three comprises studies using magnet resonance imaging (MRI, 9 articles).The following data were extracted: imaging modality, measurement method, number of participants and ankles included, average age of participants, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the measurement technique. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool was used to assess the methodological quality.
RESULTS
The three most common techniques used for assessment of the syndesmosis in conventional radiographs are the tibio-fibular clear space (TFCS), the tibio-fibular overlap (TFO), and the medial clear space (MCS). Regarding CT scans, the tibio-fibular width (axial images) was most commonly used. Most of the MRI studies used direct assessment of syndesmotic integrity. Overall, the included studies show low probability of bias and are applicable in daily practice.
CONCLUSIONS
Conventional radiographs cannot predict syndesmotic injuries reliably. CT scans outperform plain radiographs in detecting syndesmotic mal-reduction. Additionally, the syndesmotic interval can be assessed in greater detail by CT. MRI measurements achieve a sensitivity and specificity of nearly 100%; however, correlating MRI findings with patients' complaints is difficult, and utility with subtle syndesmotic instability needs further investigation. Overall, the methodological quality of these studies was satisfactory.
Topics: Ankle Injuries; Diagnosis, Differential; Humans; Predictive Value of Tests
PubMed: 29188345
DOI: 10.1007/s00256-017-2823-2 -
Cephalalgia : An International Journal... Feb 2023Migraine is a highly prevalent primary headache disorder. Despite a high burden of disease, key disease mechanisms are not entirely understood. Functional magnetic... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Migraine is a highly prevalent primary headache disorder. Despite a high burden of disease, key disease mechanisms are not entirely understood. Functional magnetic resonance imaging is an imaging method using the blood-oxygen-level-dependent signal, which has been increasingly used in migraine research over recent years. This systematic review summarizes recent findings employing functional magnetic resonance imaging for the investigation of migraine.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic search and selection of functional magnetic resonance imaging applications in migraine from April 2014 to December 2021 (PubMed and references of identified articles according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines). Methodological details and main findings were extracted and synthesized.
RESULTS
Out of 224 articles identified, 114 were included after selection. Repeatedly emerging structures of interest included the insula, brainstem, limbic system, hypothalamus, thalamus, and functional networks. Assessment of functional brain changes in response to treatment is emerging, and machine learning has been used to investigate potential functional magnetic resonance imaging-based markers of migraine.
CONCLUSIONS
A wide variety of functional magnetic resonance imaging-based metrics were found altered across the brain for heterogeneous migraine cohorts, partially correlating with clinical parameters and supporting the concept to conceive migraine as a brain state. However, a majority of findings from previous studies have not been replicated, and studies varied considerably regarding image acquisition and analyses techniques. Thus, while functional magnetic resonance imaging appears to have the potential to advance our understanding of migraine pathophysiology, replication of findings in large representative datasets and precise, standardized reporting of clinical data would likely benefit the field and further increase the value of observations.
Topics: Humans; Migraine Disorders; Brain; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Brain Mapping; Hypothalamus
PubMed: 36751858
DOI: 10.1177/03331024221128278 -
Journal of Neurosurgery. Pediatrics Sep 2022Several growth-preserving surgical techniques are employed in the management of early-onset scoliosis (EOS). The authors' objective was to compare the use of traditional... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
Several growth-preserving surgical techniques are employed in the management of early-onset scoliosis (EOS). The authors' objective was to compare the use of traditional growing rods (TGRs), magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGRs), Shilla growth guidance techniques, and vertically expanding prosthetic titanium ribs (VEPTRs) for the management of EOS.
METHODS
A systematic review of electronic databases, including Ovid MEDLINE and Cochrane, was performed. Outcomes of interest included correction of Cobb angle, T1-S1 distance, and complication rate, including alignment, hardware failure and infection, and planned and unplanned reoperation rates. The percent changes and 95% CIs were pooled across studies using random-effects meta-analysis.
RESULTS
A total of 67 studies were identified, which included 2021 patients. Of these, 1169 (57.8%) patients underwent operations with TGR, 178 (8.8%) Shilla growth guidance system, 448 (22.2%) MCGR, and 226 (11.1%) VEPTR system. The mean ± SD age of the cohort was 6.9 ± 1.2 years. The authors found that the Shilla technique provided the most significant improvement in coronal Cobb angle immediately after surgery (mean [95% CI] 64.3% [61.4%-67.2%]), whereas VEPTR (27.6% [22.7%-33.6%]) performed significantly worse. VEPTR also performed significantly worse than the other techniques at final follow-up. The techniques also provided comparable gains in T1-S1 height immediately postoperatively (mean [95% CI] 10.7% [8.4%-13.0%]); however, TGR performed better at final follow-up (21.4% [18.7%-24.1%]). Complications were not significantly different among the patients who underwent the Shilla, TGR, MCGR, and VEPTR techniques, except for the rate of infections. The TGR technique had the lowest rate of unplanned reoperations (mean [95% CI] 15% [10%-23%] vs 24% [19%-29%]) but the highest number of planned reoperations per patient (5.31 [4.83-5.82]). The overall certainty was also low, with a high risk of bias across studies.
CONCLUSIONS
This analysis suggested that the Shilla technique was associated with a greater early coronal Cobb angle correction, whereas use of VEPTR was associated with a lower correction rate at any time point. TGR offered the most significant height gain at final follow-up. The complication rates were comparable across all surgical techniques. The optimal surgical approach should be tailored to individual patients, taking into consideration the strengths and limitations of each option.
Topics: Humans; Child, Preschool; Child; Scoliosis; Prostheses and Implants; Reoperation; Titanium; Ribs; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Follow-Up Studies
PubMed: 36152334
DOI: 10.3171/2022.8.PEDS22156