-
International Journal of Molecular... Nov 2023Gliomas are aggressive malignant brain tumors, with poor prognosis despite available therapies, raising the necessity for finding new compounds with therapeutic action.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Gliomas are aggressive malignant brain tumors, with poor prognosis despite available therapies, raising the necessity for finding new compounds with therapeutic action. Numerous preclinical investigations evaluating resveratrol's anti-tumor impact in animal models of glioma have been reported; however, the variety of experimental circumstances and results have prevented conclusive findings about resveratrol's effectiveness. Several databases were searched during May 2023, ten publications were identified, satisfying the inclusion criteria, that assess the effects of resveratrol in murine glioma-bearing xenografts. To determine the efficacy of resveratrol, tumor volume and animal counts were retrieved, and the data were then subjected to a random effects meta-analysis. The influence of different experimental conditions and publication bias on resveratrol efficacy were evaluated. Comparing treated to untreated groups, resveratrol administration decreased the tumor volume. Overall, the effect's weighted standardized difference in means was -2.046 (95%CI: -3.156 to -0.936; -value < 0.001). The efficacy of the treatment was observed for animals inoculated with both human glioblastoma or rat glioma cells and for different modes of resveratrol administration. The combined administration of resveratrol and temozolomide was more effective than temozolomide alone. Reducing publication bias did not change the effectiveness of resveratrol treatment. The findings suggest that resveratrol slows the development of tumors in animal glioma models.
Topics: Humans; Rats; Mice; Animals; Temozolomide; Resveratrol; Cell Line, Tumor; Glioma; Brain Neoplasms; Models, Animal
PubMed: 38068922
DOI: 10.3390/ijms242316597 -
Critical Reviews in Oncology/hematology Apr 2017Coined as the "Warburg effect" and a recognized hallmark of cancer, energy metabolism is aberrantly geared towards aerobic glycolysis in most human cancers, including... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Coined as the "Warburg effect" and a recognized hallmark of cancer, energy metabolism is aberrantly geared towards aerobic glycolysis in most human cancers, including malignant glioma. Ketogenic metabolic therapy (KMT), i.e. nutritional intervention with ketogenic or low-glycemic diets, has been proposed as an anti-neoplastic strategy in glioma patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We here review the rationale and existing data investigating KMT in management of patients with malignant glioma and discuss the promise and potential challenges of this novel strategy. Results from published clinical studies and ongoing clinical trials on the topic are systematically reviewed, including 6 published original articles and 10 ongoing clinical trials. Search criteria for this review entailed the databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Google Scholar, as well as ICTRP (WHO) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NIH) registries.
RESULTS
A substantial amount of preclinical literature demonstrates KMT efficacy and safety in model systems of malignant glioma. Clinical literature indicates KMT safety and feasibility; 2 clinical studies suggest KMT-associated anti-neoplastic efficacy and clinical benefit. Ongoing clinical trials address KMT safety and metabolic impact, patient compliance, and patient clinical/survival benefit.
CONCLUSIONS
While clinical evidence is still limited in this evolving field, increasing numbers of ongoing clinical trials suggest that KMT is emerging as a potential therapeutic option and might be combinable with existing anti-neoplastic treatments for malignant glioma. Emerging clinical data will help answer questions concerning safety and efficacy of KMT, and are aiming to identify the most promising KMT regimen, compatibility with other anti-cancer treatments, ethical aspects, and impact on quality of life of cancer patients.
Topics: Animals; Diet, Ketogenic; Glioma; Humans
PubMed: 28325264
DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2017.02.016 -
Drugs Feb 2022Gliomas represent most common primary brain tumors. Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common subtype and carries a poor prognosis. There is growing interest in the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Gliomas represent most common primary brain tumors. Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common subtype and carries a poor prognosis. There is growing interest in the anti-glioma properties of statins. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review of the preclinical literature and to meta-analyze existing clinical studies to determine what benefit, if any, statins may confer in the context of glioma.
METHODS
The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science libraries were queried in May 2021. Preclinical studies were included if they investigated the anti-cancer effects of statins in glioma in vitro and in vivo. Clinical studies were included if they reported incidence rates of glioma by statin use, or mortality outcomes among GBM patients by statin use. Pooled point estimates were calculated using a random-effects model.
RESULTS
In total, 64 publications, 51 preclinical and 13 clinical, were included. Preclinical studies indicated that statins inhibited glioma cell proliferation, migration, and invasion. These effects were time- and concentration-dependent. Synergistic anti-glioma effects were observed when statins were combined with other anti-cancer therapies. Clinical observational studies showed an inverse, albeit non-statistically significant, association between statin use and incidence rate of glioma (HR = 0.84, 95% CI 0.62-1.13, I = 72%, p-heterogeneity = 0.003, 6 studies). Statin use was not associated with better overall survival following GBM surgery (HR = 1.05, 95% CI 0.85-1.30, I = 30%, p-heterogeneity = 0.23, 4 studies).
CONCLUSION
Statins were potent anti-cancer drugs that suppressed glioma growth through various mechanisms in vitro; these effects have translated into the clinical realm, clinically but not statistically, in terms of glioma incidence but not GBM survival.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Glioma; Humans; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors
PubMed: 35122635
DOI: 10.1007/s40265-021-01668-x -
Expert Reviews in Molecular Medicine Mar 2023Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most frequent adult malignant brain tumour and despite different therapeutic efforts, the median overall survival still ranges from 14 to 18... (Review)
Review
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most frequent adult malignant brain tumour and despite different therapeutic efforts, the median overall survival still ranges from 14 to 18 months. Thus, new therapeutic strategies are urgently needed. However, the identification of cancer-specific targets is particularly challenging in GBM, due to the high heterogeneity of this tumour in terms of histopathological, molecular, genetic and epigenetic features. Telomerase reactivation is a hallmark of malignant glioma. An activating mutation of the hTERT gene, encoding for the active subunit of telomerase, is one of the molecular criteria to establish a diagnosis of GBM, IDH-wildtype, in the 2021 WHO classification of central nervous system tumours. Telomerase inhibition therefore represents, at least theoretically, a promising strategy for GBM therapy: pharmacological compounds, as well as direct gene expression modulation therapies, have been successfully employed in and settings. Unfortunately, the clinical applications of telomerase inhibition in GBM are currently scarce. The aim of the present systematic review is to provide an up-to-date report on the studies investigating telomerase inhibition as a therapeutic strategy for malignant glioma in order to foster the future translational and clinical research on this topic.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Telomerase; Glioma; Brain Neoplasms; Glioblastoma; Genetic Therapy
PubMed: 36919343
DOI: 10.1017/erm.2023.6 -
World Neurosurgery Jul 2023To develop a research overview of brain tumor classification using machine learning, we conducted a systematic review with a bibliometric analysis. Our systematic review... (Review)
Review
To develop a research overview of brain tumor classification using machine learning, we conducted a systematic review with a bibliometric analysis. Our systematic review and bibliometric analysis included 1747 studies of automated brain tumor detection using machine learning reported in the previous 5 years (2019-2023) from 679 different sources and authored by 6632 investigators. Bibliographic data were collected from the Scopus database, and a comprehensive bibliometric analysis was conducted using Biblioshiny and the R platform. The most productive and collaborative institutes, reports, journals, and countries were determined using citation analysis. In addition, various collaboration metrics were determined at the institute, country, and author level. Lotka's law was tested using the authors' performance. Analysis showed that the authors' publication trends followed Lotka's inverse square law. An annual publication analysis showed that 36.46% of the studies had been reported in 2022, with steady growth from previous years. Most of the cited authors had focused on multiclass classification and novel convolutional neural network models that are efficient for small training sets. A keyword analysis showed that "deep learning," "magnetic resonance imaging," "nuclear magnetic resonance imaging," and "glioma" appeared most often, proving that of the several brain tumor types, most studies had focused on glioma. India, China, and the United States were among the highest collaborative countries in terms of both authors and institutes. The University of Toronto and Harvard Medical School had the highest number of affiliations with 132 and 87 publications, respectively.
Topics: Humans; Brain; Brain Neoplasms; Glioma; Machine Learning; Bibliometrics; Radiopharmaceuticals
PubMed: 37019303
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.03.115 -
Chinese Clinical Oncology Aug 2022Glioma is the most common intracranial primary malignant tumor, and half of it is glioblastoma. Despite receiving the standard treatment, the prognosis of glioblastoma...
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE
Glioma is the most common intracranial primary malignant tumor, and half of it is glioblastoma. Despite receiving the standard treatment, the prognosis of glioblastoma is still poor and its 5-year survival rate in China is only 9%. In addition, new targeted and immunotherapy therapy and tumor treating fields also have certain curative effects on glioblastoma. To help clinicians and patients make appropriate treatment based on current evidences, we summarize the Chinese guidelines on the management of glioma and review the recent management of glioblastoma.
METHODS
We systematically searched PubMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Wanfang databases to retrieve guidelines on glioma in China published from the establishment of the database to 24 January 2022. We performed a narrative review of current clinical study related to the management of glioblastoma, especially in the surgical, targeted and immunotherapy therapy and tumor treating fields.
KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS
In this review, 19 guidelines were included, including 8 subclassified as the guideline, 8 subclassified as the consensus and 3 subclassified as the standard. Two guidelines reported the contents of the system search, 4 guidelines are updated, and 9 guidelines reported the source of funding. At present, most clinical trials on the immune and targeted therapy of glioblastoma are ongoing in China.
CONCLUSIONS
China's guidelines still need to be improved in terms of preciseness, applicability and editorial independence. In addition, the cooperation in clinical research of glioblastoma in multiple centers needs to be strengthened in China.
Topics: Brain Neoplasms; China; Databases, Factual; Glioblastoma; Glioma; Humans
PubMed: 36098100
DOI: 10.21037/cco-22-18 -
Neuro-oncology Mar 2023This systematic review provides updated insights, from the published literature in the past 5 years, based on the 2017 European Association of Neuro-Oncology (EANO)...
BACKGROUND
This systematic review provides updated insights, from the published literature in the past 5 years, based on the 2017 European Association of Neuro-Oncology (EANO) guidelines for palliative care in adults with malignant brain tumors. It provides an overview of palliative care options, including during the end-of-life phase for patients with malignant brain tumors.
METHODS
A systematic literature search was conducted from 2016 to 2021 focusing on four main topics: (1) symptom management, (2) caregiver needs, (3) early palliative care, and (4) care in the end-of-life phase. An international panel of palliative care experts in neuro-oncology synthesized the literature and reported the most relevant updates. A total of 140 articles were included.
RESULTS
New insights include that: Hippocampal avoidance and stereotactic radiosurgery results in a lower risk of neurocognitive decline in patients with brain metastases; levetiracetam is more efficacious in reducing seizures than valproic acid as first-line monotherapy antiseizure drug (ASD) in glioma patients; lacosamide and perampanel seem well-tolerated and efficacious add-on ASDs; and a comprehensive framework of palliative and supportive care for high-grade glioma patients and their caregivers was proposed. No pharmacological agents have been shown in randomized controlled trials to significantly improve fatigue or neurocognition.
CONCLUSIONS
Since the 2017 EANO palliative care guidelines, new insights have been reported regarding symptom management and end-of-life care, however, most recommendations remain unchanged. Early palliative care interventions are essential to define goals of care and minimize symptom burden in a timely fashion. Interventional studies that address pain, fatigue, and psychiatric symptoms as well as (the timing of) early palliative care are urgently needed.
Topics: Humans; Adult; Terminal Care; Brain Neoplasms; Glioma; Death; Fatigue
PubMed: 36271873
DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noac216 -
Journal of Neuroimaging : Official... May 2022Angiocentric gliomas (AGs) are epileptogenic low-grade gliomas in young patients. We aimed to investigate the MRI findings of AGs and systematically review previous... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Angiocentric gliomas (AGs) are epileptogenic low-grade gliomas in young patients. We aimed to investigate the MRI findings of AGs and systematically review previous publications and three new cases.
METHODS
We searched PubMed, Elsevier's abstract and citation database, and Embase databases and included 50 patients with pathologically proven AGs with analyzable preoperative MRI including 3 patients from our institution and 47 patients from 38 publications (median age, 13 years [range, 2-83 years]; 35 men). Two board-certified radiologists reviewed all images. The relationships between seizure/epilepsy history and MRI findings were statistically analyzed. Moreover, clinical and imaging differences were evaluated between supratentorial and brainstem AGs.
RESULTS
Intratumoral T1-weighted high-intensity areas, stalk-like signs, and regional brain parenchymal atrophy were observed in 23 out of 50 (46.0%), 10 out of 50 (20.0%), and 14 out of 50 (28.0%) patients, respectively. Intratumoral T1-weighted high-intensity areas were observed significantly more frequently in patients with stalk-like signs (positive, 9/10 vs. negative, 14/40, p = .0031) and regional atrophy (13/14 vs. 10/36, p = .0001). There were significant relationships between the length of seizure/epilepsy history and presence of intratumoral T1-weighted high-intensity area (median 3 years vs. 0.5 years, p = .0021), stalk-like sign (13.5 vs. 1 year, p < .0001), and regional atrophy (14 vs. 0.5 years, p < .0001). Patients with brainstem AGs (n = 7) did not have a seizure/epilepsy history and were significantly younger than those with supratentorial AGs (median, 5 vs. 13 years, p < .0001, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS
Intratumoral T1-weighted high-intensity areas, stalk-like signs, and regional brain atrophy were frequent imaging features in AG. We also found that affected age was different between supratentorial and brainstem AGs.
Topics: Adolescent; Atrophy; Brain Neoplasms; Female; Glioma; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Neuroimaging; Seizures
PubMed: 35201652
DOI: 10.1111/jon.12983 -
The British Journal of Nutrition Jan 2022In this systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis, we aimed to assess whether coffee and tea consumption is related to the risk of glioma. We performed a... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
In this systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis, we aimed to assess whether coffee and tea consumption is related to the risk of glioma. We performed a systematic literature search using PubMed, Embase, Scopus and the EuropePMC from the inception of database up until 1 October 2020. Exposures in the present study were coffee and tea consumption, the main outcome was the incidence of glioma. The present study compares the association between the exposure of coffee and tea with the incidence of glioma, and the results are reported in relative risks (RR). There are 12 unique studies comprising of 1 960 731 participants with 2987 glioma cases. Higher coffee consumption was associated with a statistically non-significant trend towards lower risk of glioma (RR 0·77 (95 % CI 0·55, 1·03), P= 0·11; I2:75·27 %). Meta-regression showed that the association between coffee and glioma was reduced by smoking (P= 0·029). Higher tea consumption was associated with a lower risk of glioma (RR 0·84 (95 % CI 0·71, 0·98), P= 0·030; I2:16·42 %). Sensitivity analysis by removal of case-control studies showed that higher coffee consumption (RR 0·85 (95 % CI 0·72, 1·00), P= 0·046; I2:0 %) and higher tea consumption (RR 0·81 (95 % CI 0·70, 0·93), P= 0·004; I2:0 %, Pnon-linearity = 0·140) were associated with lower risk of glioma. Dose-response meta-analysis showed that every one cup of coffee per day decreases the risk of glioma by 3 % (RR 0·97 (95 % CI 0·94, 0·99), P= 0·016, Pnon-linearity = 0·054) and every one cup of tea per day decreases the risk of glioma by 3 % (RR 0·97 (95 % CI 0·94, 1·00), P= 0·048). This meta-analysis showed apparent association between coffee and tea intake and risk of glioma.
Topics: Coffee; Glioma; Humans; Incidence; Risk; Risk Factors; Tea
PubMed: 33750490
DOI: 10.1017/S0007114521000830 -
Reviews in the Neurosciences Jun 2018Although different immunotherapeutic approaches have been developed for the treatment of glioma, there is a discrepancy between clinical trials limiting their approval... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Although different immunotherapeutic approaches have been developed for the treatment of glioma, there is a discrepancy between clinical trials limiting their approval as common treatment. So, the current systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to assess survival and clinical response of specific immunotherapy in patients with glioma. Generally, seven databases were searched to find eligible studies. Controlled clinical trials investigating the efficacy of specific immunotherapy in glioma were found eligible. After data extraction and risk of bias assessment, the data were analyzed based on the level of heterogeneity. Overall, 25 articles with 2964 patients were included. Generally, mean overall survival did not statistically improve in immunotherapy [median difference=1.51; 95% confidence interval (CI)=-0.16-3.17; p=0.08]; however, it was 11.16 months higher in passive immunotherapy (95% CI=5.69-16.64; p<0.0001). One-year overall survival was significantly higher in immunotherapy groups [hazard ratio (HR)=0.69; 95% CI=0.52-0.92; p=0.01]. As the hazard rate in the immunotherapy approach was 0.83 of the control group, 2-year overall survival was significantly higher in immunotherapy (HR=0.83; 95% CI=0.69-0.99; p=0.04). Three-year overall survival was significantly higher in immunotherapy as well (HR=0.67; 95% CI=0.48-0.92; p=0.01). Overall, median progression-free survival was significantly higher in immunotherapy (standard median difference=0.323; 95% CI=0.110-0.536; p=0.003). However, 1-year progression-free survival was not remarkably different between immunotherapy and control groups (HR=0.94; 95% CI=0.74-1.18; p=0.59). Specific immunotherapy demonstrated remarkable improvement in survival of patients with glioma and could be a considerable choice of treatment in the future. Despite the current promising results, further high-quality randomized controlled trials are required to approve immunotherapeutic approaches as the standard of care and the front-line treatment for glioma.
Topics: Brain Neoplasms; Glioma; Humans; Immunotherapy
PubMed: 29320366
DOI: 10.1515/revneuro-2017-0057