-
The Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and... Jan 2023To perform a systematic review to investigate the common presenting symptoms of barosinusitis, the incidence of those findings, the methods for diagnosis, as well as the...
OBJECTIVE
To perform a systematic review to investigate the common presenting symptoms of barosinusitis, the incidence of those findings, the methods for diagnosis, as well as the medical and surgical treatment options.
METHODS
A review of PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library for articles published between 1967 and 2020 was conducted with the following search term: aerosinusitis OR "sinus squeeze" OR barosinusitis OR (barotrauma AND sinusitis) OR (barotrauma AND rhinosinusitis). Twenty-seven articles encompassing 232 patients met inclusion criteria and were queried for demographics, etiology, presentation, and medical and surgical treatments.
RESULTS
Mean age of patients was 33.3 years, where 21.7% were females and 78.3% were males. Causes of barotrauma include diving (57.3%), airplane descent (26.7%), and general anesthesia (0.4%). The most common presentations were frontal pain (44.0%), epistaxis (25.4%), and maxillary pain (10.3%). Most patients received topical steroids (44.0%), oral steroids (28.4%), decongestants (20.7%), and antibiotics (15.5%). For surgical treatment, most patients received functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) (49.6%). Adjunctive surgeries include middle meatal or maxillary antrostomy (20.7%), septoplasty (15.5%), and turbinate surgery (9.1%). The most efficacious medical treatments are as follows: 63.6% success rate with oral steroids (66 treated), 50.0% success rate with topical steroids (102 treated), and 50.0% success rate analgesics (10 treated). For surgical treatments received by greater than 10% of the sample, the most efficacious was FESS (91.5% success rate, 108 treated).
CONCLUSION
Oral and topical steroids should be first line therapies. If refractory, then functional endoscopic sinus surgery is an effective treatment.
Topics: Male; Female; Humans; Adult; Endoscopy; Sinusitis; Barotrauma; Steroids; Chronic Disease; Craniocerebral Trauma; Pain
PubMed: 35130739
DOI: 10.1177/00034894211072353 -
Otolaryngology--head and Neck Surgery :... Apr 2022Odontogenic sinusitis (ODS) can cause infectious orbital, intracranial, and osseous complications. Diagnosis and management of complicated ODS have not been discussed in...
OBJECTIVE
Odontogenic sinusitis (ODS) can cause infectious orbital, intracranial, and osseous complications. Diagnosis and management of complicated ODS have not been discussed in recent sinusitis guidelines. The purpose of this systematic review was to describe epidemiological and clinical features, as well as management strategies of complicated ODS.
DATA SOURCES
PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library.
REVIEW METHODS
A systematic review was performed to describe various features of complicated ODS. All complicated ODS studies were included in qualitative analysis, but studies were only included in quantitative analysis if they reported specific patient-level data.
RESULTS
Of 1126 studies identified, 75 studies with 110 complicated ODS cases were included in qualitative analysis, and 47 studies with 62 orbital and intracranial complications were included in quantitative analyses. About 70% of complicated ODS cases were orbital complications. Only 23% of complicated ODS studies were published in otolaryngology journals. Regarding ODS-related orbital and intracranial complications, about 80% occurred in adults, and 75% were male. Complicated ODS occurred most commonly from apical periodontitis of maxillary molars. There were no relationships between sinusitis extent and orbital or intracranial complications. High rates of anaerobic and α-hemolytic streptococcal bacteria were identified in complicated ODS. Management generally included systemic antibiotics covering aerobic and anaerobic bacteria, and surgical interventions were generally performed to address both the complications (orbital and/or intracranial) and possible infectious sources (dentition and sinuses).
CONCLUSION
ODS should be considered in all patients with infectious extrasinus complications. Multidisciplinary management between otolaryngologists, dental specialists, ophthalmologists, and neurosurgeons should be considered to optimize outcomes.
Topics: Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Humans; Male; Orbital Diseases; Otolaryngologists; Otolaryngology; Paranasal Sinuses; Sinusitis
PubMed: 34253072
DOI: 10.1177/01945998211026268 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Oct 2015Currently, two separate Cochrane reviews, ‘’ and ‘’ describe the effect of antibiotics for acute rhinosinusitis. Although both Cochrane reviews study the same... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Currently, two separate Cochrane reviews, ‘’ and ‘’ describe the effect of antibiotics for acute rhinosinusitis. Although both Cochrane reviews study the same condition, they look at different populations (patients in which the diagnosis was based on clinical signs and symptoms and patients in which the diagnosis was confirmed by imaging). Because of this, the conclusions are different in these Cochrane reviews. This was confusing for clinicians who needed to read both Cochrane reviews to know which conclusions are most applicable to their patients. This review is being withdrawn and will be incorporated into the updated publication of ‘’. This ‘merged’ review will still maintain the relevant distinction between the two populations. However, information on the effectiveness of antibiotics for rhinosinusitis will be published in the ‘merged’ Cochrane review. We will omit the comparison between antibiotics (as published in this Cochrane review) because the choice for certain antibiotics and/or doses differs according to the local antibiotic resistance patterns and therefore this comparison is less relevant. The editorial group responsible for this previously published document have withdrawn it from publication.
Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Maxillary Sinusitis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 26471061
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000243.pub4 -
The Journal of Oral Implantology Dec 2022To evaluate the available literature reporting the survival and complication rate of zygomatic implants, assessing factors (such as surgical technique,...
AIM
To evaluate the available literature reporting the survival and complication rate of zygomatic implants, assessing factors (such as surgical technique, surgical/restorative plan, population, study design and characteristics, etc.) associated with these outcomes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A comprehensive search was performed in three electronic databases, together with a manual search, to identify clinical studies reporting the survival and/or complication rates following zygomatic implant therapy, to quantify relative rates for both stated outcomes. Results: 101 articles were included: 69 were retrospective in nature, 29 were prospective non-randomized studies and 3 were randomized trials (RCTs). The mean survival rate among retrospective studies was 97.61%, while among prospective non-RCTs and RCTs was 98.53% and 95.92%, respectively. The survival rate was not associated with the surgical technique, nor with the surgical/restorative plan. A trend towards higher survival rate, although not statistically significant (p>0.05), was observed in more recent vs less recent studies. Forty-eight articles reported data on complications related to zygomatic implants, with labial laceration, orbital cavity penetration, hematoma, epistaxis, maxillary sinusitis, infection and oro-antral communication being among the most common adverse event. A lower incidence of maxillary sinusitis was observed for zygomatic implants placed using the extrasinus approach compared to the other surgical approaches (p<0.01). The incidence of maxillary sinusitis and oro-antral communications was found to be less likely in "recent" vs "less recent" studies (p<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
Zygomatic implant therapy is a reliable treatment option for rehabilitating the severely atrophic maxilla, with high implant survival rate and relatively low complication rate. Several factors were found to be associated with the incidence of post-operative complications. Nevertheless, the evidence from the literature is mainly based on non-RCTs and therefore these findings have to be interpreted with cautions.
PubMed: 36473176
DOI: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-22-00008 -
American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy Sep 2021Odontogenic sinusitis affects a significant proportion of patients with paranasal sinus infections. Nevertheless, no shared diagnostic criteria for this condition have...
BACKGROUND
Odontogenic sinusitis affects a significant proportion of patients with paranasal sinus infections. Nevertheless, no shared diagnostic criteria for this condition have yet been implemented and published studies differ in their definition of the disease.
OBJECTIVE
The present systematic review of the literature was undertaken to characterize and analyze the different diagnostic criteria currently employed for odontogenic sinusitis.
METHODS
Systematic searches for studies published between 2009 and 2019 were performed in Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases. Search criteria were designed to identify all studies focusing, even partially, on odontogenic sinusitis. Human original studies except single case reports published in the English, French, German, Spanish, or Italian language were included. We removed duplicate abstracts and conducted full-text reads, data extraction, and quality assessment procedures (using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine levels of evidence and National Heart Lung and Blood Institute Study Quality Assessment Tools). We reviewed articles for diagnostic criteria, both in terms of definition and etiology identification.
RESULTS
Among 1,000 unique citations, 63 studies were deemed eligible. Most articles (n = 45) were retrospective case series; a single randomized clinical trial was available. Only 49 studies reported diagnostic criteria, yet relied marginally on published guidelines (n = 10 articles) for identifying sinusitis, often choosing instead to develop their own clinical (n = 15 articles), endoscopic (n = 12 articles), and/or radiologic (n = 30 articles) criteria. For odontogenic focus identification, 14 papers required a multidisciplinary evaluation, 11 papers required a time relationship between dental procedures and sinusitis, 24 papers required oroscopy and/or dental evaluation, and 53 papers required computed tomography.
CONCLUSIONS
Current diagnostic criteria for odontogenic sinusitis are extremely heterogeneous. Establishing shared diagnostic criteria aimed at defining both sinusitis and related odontogenic foci would spur collaboration between investigators and support more comprehensive outcomes evaluations together with a better understanding of treatment options.
Topics: Endoscopy; Humans; Maxillary Sinusitis; Paranasal Sinuses; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Retrospective Studies; Sinusitis; Tomography, X-Ray Computed
PubMed: 33236664
DOI: 10.1177/1945892420976766 -
International Journal of Oral and... Feb 2023The displacement of dental implants into the maxillary sinus is increasingly reported and may lead to serious complications. Better knowledge of this condition could... (Review)
Review
The displacement of dental implants into the maxillary sinus is increasingly reported and may lead to serious complications. Better knowledge of this condition could help clinicians improve their practice, but it is difficult to draw conclusions from the current literature. Therefore, a systematic review was performed to describe the main characteristics of dental implant displacement, as well as its management and temporal evolution over a 31-year period. This review was conducted according to the PRISMA methodology. The PubMed/Scopus electronic databases were searched to December 2021. Risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute tools. A total of 73 articles reporting 321 patients with displaced dental implants were included. Implants located in the upper first molar site were the most frequently involved (23.7%). Displacement occurred mainly during the first 6 months after implant placement (62.6%). The majority became symptomatic (56.2%), most often due to maxillary sinusitis and/or oroantral communication (44.2%). The surgical approaches to remove displaced implants were the lateral approach (38.1%), the Caldwell-Luc approach (27.2%), and endoscopic nasal surgery (23.1%). This review highlights the importance of preventive measures: avoiding implant displacement by careful pre-implantation radiographic analysis, but also preventing infectious complications through early removal of the displaced implant (PROSPERO CRD42021279473).
Topics: Humans; Maxillary Sinus; Dental Implants; Maxillary Sinusitis; Molar; Endoscopy
PubMed: 35778233
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2022.06.009 -
Journal of Clinical Medicine Oct 2022Background: To assess the diagnostic utility of middle meatal culture (MMC) in patients with acute and chronic sinusitis; Methods: Six databases were thoroughly reviewed... (Review)
Review
Background: To assess the diagnostic utility of middle meatal culture (MMC) in patients with acute and chronic sinusitis; Methods: Six databases were thoroughly reviewed up to March 2022. Sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive values were extracted. Methodological quality was evaluated using the QUADAS-2 instrument; Results: Fifteen reports were analyzed. MMC results exhibited a significant correlation (r = 0.7590, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.6855; 0.8172], p < 0.0001) with those of maxillary sinus puncture. The diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of MMC (reference = maxillary sinus culture) was 8.5475 [3.9238; 18.6199]. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.761. The sensitivity and specificity of MMC were 0.7759 [0.6744; 0.8526] and 0.7514 [0.6110; 0.8534], respectively. We performed subgroup analysis based on age (children vs. adults), duration of disease (acute vs. chronic), and specimen collection method (biopsy, swabs, suction tips). The DORs, specificities, and negative and positive predictive values varied significantly. Diagnostic accuracy was highest for children and individuals with chronic disease, and when samples were collected via suction.; Conclusions: MMC provided fair diagnostic accuracy in patients with acute or chronic sinusitis. Although some institutional differences were evident, the middle meatal and maxillary sinus culture results were similar.
PubMed: 36294389
DOI: 10.3390/jcm11206069 -
Expert Review of Clinical Immunology 2023Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) has a high recurrence rate after surgery despite the availability of medical treatments. Multiple clinical and... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) has a high recurrence rate after surgery despite the availability of medical treatments. Multiple clinical and biological factors have been associated with poor post-operative outcomes in patients with CRSwNP. However, these factors and their prognostic values have not yet been extensively summarized.
AREAS COVERED
This systematic review included 49 cohort studies exploring the prognostic factors for post-operative outcomes in CRSwNP. A total of 7802 subjects and 174 factors were included. All investigated factors were classified into three categories according to their predictive value and evidence quality, of which 26 factors were considered plausible for post-operative outcome prediction. Previous nasal surgery, ethmoid-to-maxillary (E/M) ratio, fractional exhaled nitric oxide, tissue eosinophil count or percentage, tissue neutrophil count, tissue IL-5, tissue eosinophil cationic protein, and CLC or IgE in nasal secretion provided more reliable information for prognosis in at least two studies.
EXPERT OPINION
Exploring predictors through noninvasive or minimally invasive methods for specimen collection is recommended for future work. Models combining multiple factors must be established, as no single factor is effective for the whole population.
Topics: Humans; Prognosis; Nasal Polyps; Rhinitis; Sinusitis; Chronic Disease; Eosinophils
PubMed: 37225659
DOI: 10.1080/1744666X.2023.2218089 -
Medicine Sep 2023The objective of this review is to investigate and analyze the anatomical variations present in the maxillary sinus (MS), through the examination of the prevalence of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
The objective of this review is to investigate and analyze the anatomical variations present in the maxillary sinus (MS), through the examination of the prevalence of these variations, as well as the corresponding prevalence of clinically significant pathologies and complications associated with them.
METHODS
The search process was carried out in the following databases; MEDLINE, SCIELO, WOS, CINHAL, SCOPUS, and GOOGLE SCHOLAR, using as search terms; "Maxillary bone," "Maxillary sinus," "Paranasal sinus," "Anatomical variations," "Sinusitis" and "Clinical anatomy."
RESULTS
A total of 26 articles and 12969 samples were included, from which 12,594 subjects had their sex recorded giving a total of 5802 males and 6792 females. The variants reported by the included were Haller cells, Concha Bullosa, Number of septa, Hypoplastic sinus, Agger Nasi, Thickening of the MS mucosa, Deviation of the nasal septum, Accessory ostium, and Onodi cells. Among the mentioned, the ones that presented the greatest number of studies (between 8 and 10 studies included) were: the Haller Cells, the Concha Bullosa, and the Number of septa, where prevalence was 0.30, 0.36, 0.39 respectively. These variations can lead to sinusitis, cause some types of tumors, or affect neighboring structures that could be compromised by this variation.
CONCLUSION
As a result, it is certainly complex to distinguish the presence of anatomical variations from pathological abnormalities. Therefore, knowledge of the different variations and their clinical relationships could be a useful asset for clinicians dedicated to this region.
Topics: Female; Male; Humans; Nose Diseases; Databases, Factual; Knowledge; MEDLINE; Maxillary Sinus
PubMed: 37747000
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034510 -
The Journal of Craniofacial SurgeryMaxillary osteotomies as a component of orthognathic surgery disrupt the normal anatomy and function of the sinus. The osteotomy with advancement of the inferior... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Maxillary osteotomies as a component of orthognathic surgery disrupt the normal anatomy and function of the sinus. The osteotomy with advancement of the inferior component of the sinus leaves a bony and mucosal opening in the sinus. Immediately after surgery, nasal drainage is impeded because of intranasal swelling. Acute and chronic maxillary sinusitis would be expected; however, its incidence as an expected complication is not well documented. A systematic review and meta-analysis was completed using PubMed to determine the incidence of sinusitis after maxillary orthognathic surgery. Studies were reviewed by two authors, and incidence data were extracted. Two hundred six articles were identified with 24 meeting the criteria for analysis. The incidence of sinusitis was based on 4213 participants who had undergone orthognathic surgery. Twenty-three studies reported a total number of sinusitis cases, and the results demonstrated a pooled incidence of 3.3% (95% confidence interval: 1.77, 6.06). One study did not report a total number of cases but reported chronic sinusitis survey-duration-based and Lund-Mackay scores. These scores, respectively, worsened from 7.6 to 14.8 and from 1.58 to 2.90 postoperatively. Despite the variability of maxillary surgery, the surgical technique, and the postoperative management, the incidence is low but sinusitis does occur. Prospective studies with validated questionnaires within the context of a specific protocol may further elucidate the causality of sinusitis. Further, patients with sinonasal symptoms postsurgery should be encouraged to consult with an otolaryngologist to ensure prompt treatment.
Topics: Humans; Orthognathic Surgery; Prospective Studies; Incidence; Sinusitis; Maxillary Sinusitis; Osteotomy; Chronic Disease; Endoscopy
PubMed: 37681995
DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000009738