-
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology,... Jan 2015To determine the incidence and clinical significance of postoperative meniscus transplant extrusion. (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
To determine the incidence and clinical significance of postoperative meniscus transplant extrusion.
METHODS
A systematic search was performed using PubMed and Cochrane online databases. Inclusionary criteria were English language, clinical trials of meniscus transplantation published from 1984 to 2014, and meniscus extrusion measured on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
RESULTS
Twenty-three studies were included, in which 814 menisci were implanted into 803 patients. MRIs were obtained from 2 days to 10 years postoperatively. Eighteen studies used fresh-frozen meniscus transplants implanted with bone (n = 612) or suture fixation (n = 116); four studies, cryopreserved transplants; and one, irradiated transplants. Three measurements assessed extrusion: absolute millimeters of extrusion (0-8.8 mm), relative percentage of extrusion (0-100%), and the percent of transplants that were extruded (0-100 %). Relationships between transplant extrusion and clinical rating scales, joint space narrowing on standing radiographs, and arthrosis progression were inconclusive. Non-anatomic placement of lateral meniscus transplants and suture fixation of medial and lateral transplants were associated with greater extrusion in two studies.
CONCLUSIONS
Inconsistencies among studies prevent conclusions regarding the incidence and clinical significance of meniscus transplant extrusion. Even so, the short- to mid-term results were encouraging for knee function with daily activities and low rates of failure requiring transplant removal. A postoperative MRI showing more than 3-mm extrusion occurring in some studies suggested technique and/or implant sizing problems that required correction. Future studies should report absolute transplant extrusion, relative percent of extrusion, percent of transplant within the tibiofemoral compartment, and the percent of transplants that are extruded.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
IV.
Topics: Arthroplasty; Humans; Incidence; Knee Joint; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Menisci, Tibial; Postoperative Complications; Tissue Transplantation; Transplants
PubMed: 25246176
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-3329-2 -
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology,... Sep 2023To evaluate the overall evidence of published health-economic evaluation studies on meniscus tear treatment. (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
To evaluate the overall evidence of published health-economic evaluation studies on meniscus tear treatment.
METHODS
Our systematic review focuses on health-economic evaluation studies of meniscus tear treatment interventions found in PubMed and Embase databases. A qualitative, descriptive approach was used to analyze the studies' results and systematically report them following PRISMA guidelines. The health-economic evaluation method for each included study was categorized following one of the four approaches: partial economic evaluation (PEE), cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA), cost-benefit analysis (CBA), or cost-utility analysis (CUA). The quality of each included study was assessed using the Consensus on Health Economic Criteria (CHEC) list. Comparisons of input variables and outcomes were made, if applicable.
RESULTS
Sixteen studies were included; of these, six studies performed PEE, seven studies CUA, two studies CEA, and one study combined CBA, CUA, and CEA. The following economic comparisons were analyzed and showed the respective comparative outcomes: (1) meniscus repair was more cost-effective than arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (meniscectomy) for reparable meniscus tear; (2) non-operative treatment or physical therapy was less costly than meniscectomy for degenerative meniscus tear; (3) physical therapy with delayed meniscectomy was more cost-effective than early meniscectomy for meniscus tear with knee osteoarthritis; (4) meniscectomy without physical therapy was less costly than meniscectomy with physical therapy; (5) meniscectomy was more cost-effective than either meniscus allograft transplantation or meniscus scaffold procedure; (6) the conventional arthroscopic instrument cost was lower than laser-assisted arthroscopy in meniscectomy procedures.
CONCLUSION
Results from this review suggest that meniscus repair is the most cost-effective intervention for reparable meniscus tears. Physical therapy followed by delayed meniscectomy is the most cost-effective intervention for degenerative meniscus tears. Meniscus scaffold should be avoided, especially when implemented on a large scale.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Systematic review of level IV studies.
Topics: Humans; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Meniscectomy; Osteoarthritis, Knee; Meniscus; Arthroscopy; Menisci, Tibial
PubMed: 36637478
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-022-07278-8 -
The American Journal of Sports Medicine Jun 2023Medial meniscus posterior root (MMPR) injuries accelerate the progression of osteoarthritis. While partial meniscectomy was once considered the gold standard for... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Medial meniscus posterior root (MMPR) injuries accelerate the progression of osteoarthritis. While partial meniscectomy was once considered the gold standard for treatment, meniscus root repair has become increasingly utilized with reported improvements in clinical and biomechanical outcomes.
PURPOSE
To perform a systematic review of biomechanical outcomes and a meta-analysis of clinical and radiographic outcomes after MMPR repair.
STUDY DESIGN
Meta-analysis and systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS
The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were queried in August 2021 for studies reporting biomechanical, clinical, and radiographic outcomes after MMPR repair. Biomechanical studies were assessed for main results and conclusions. Data including study characteristics, cohort demographics, and outcomes were extracted. Included clinical studies were analyzed with a random-effects meta-analysis of proportions for binary outcomes or continuous outcomes for mean differences between preoperative and postoperative time points. Subgroup analysis for studies reporting repair outcomes with concomitant high tibial osteotomy (HTO) was performed where appropriate.
RESULTS
A total of 13 biomechanical studies were identified and reported an overall improvement in mean and peak contact pressures after MMPR repair. There were 24 clinical studies, consisting of 876 patients (877 knees), identified, with 3 studies (106 knees) reporting outcomes with concomitant HTO. The mean patient age was 57.1 years (range, 23-74 years), with a mean follow-up of 27.7 months (range, 2-64 months). Overall, clinical outcomes (Lysholm, Hospital for Special Surgery, International Knee Documentation Committee, visual analog scale for pain, Tegner, and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score scores) were noted to improve postoperatively compared with preoperatively, with improved Lysholm scores in patients undergoing concomitant HTO versus MMPR repair alone. Meniscal extrusion was not significantly improved after MMPR repair compared with preoperative measurements. The progression in Kellgren-Lawrence grades from grade 0 to grades 1 to 3 occurred in 5.9% (21/354) of patients after repair, with no patients progressing from grades 1 to 3 to grade 4.
CONCLUSION
MMPR repair generally improved biomechanical outcomes and led to improved patient-reported outcomes with greater improvements noted in patients undergoing concomitant HTO. Repair did not significantly improve meniscal extrusion, while only 5.9% of patients were noted to progress to low-grade osteoarthritis. The high level of heterogeneity in the included biomechanical and clinical investigations emphasizes the need for more well-designed studies that evaluate outcomes after MMPR repair.
Topics: Humans; Young Adult; Adult; Middle Aged; Aged; Menisci, Tibial; Retrospective Studies; Knee Joint; Meniscectomy; Osteoarthritis; Arthroscopy
PubMed: 35384728
DOI: 10.1177/03635465221077271 -
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology,... Sep 2021The purpose of this study was to systematically review case reports and case series about meniscal ossicle, to summarize existing evidence. Specifically, to identify the... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
The purpose of this study was to systematically review case reports and case series about meniscal ossicle, to summarize existing evidence. Specifically, to identify the etiology, demographic characteristics, localization, clinical features, diagnostic procedures and treatment options of this rare entity. Although, case reports/ series are of low level of evidence, a systematic review of such studies can provide and help us to gain a better understanding and awareness of meniscal ossicle.
METHODS
Two authors searched three online databases (MEDLINE, SCOPUS and GOOGLE SCHOLAR) from inception until March 2020 for the literature on meniscal ossicle. Inclusion criteria included case series, case reports and case-based reviews, available in full-text version, in English and that concern humans. Reports published in languages other than English were excluded, as well as articles with no electronic full text availability. Case reports using the term "meniscal ossicle" to describe an acute avulsion fracture of the tibial root of the meniscus, were also excluded.
RESULTS
Of 453 initial studies, 38 studies satisfied inclusion criteria. In total 169 patients were included of whom 107 (63%) were males and 62 (37%) were females. Mean age was 44 years (range 12-87). According to Magnetic resonance imaging findings, in 144 knees (86%) the ossicle was localized at the posterior root or horn of the medial meniscus. 60% of the patients had a history of trauma. The predominant symptom in 87% of patients was knee pain. In all patients was detected an intra-articular density structure in computed radiography. 76% had associated meniscal tear, 61% had intraarticular cartilage loss, 34% meniscal extrusion and 28% anterior cruciate ligament injury. Treatment modalities included conservative regimen in 40 patients, while 59 patients underwent surgical excision.
CONCLUSION
The most possible etiology of meniscal ossicle is posttraumatic heterotopic ossification and small occult bony avulsion fracture. It is commonly observed in individuals complaining about knee pain with history of antecedent trauma. The presence of a meniscal ossicle should alert the physician to the high likelihood of the patient having an associated meniscal tear, articular cartilage loss, ACL injury or meniscal extrusion. Along with the meniscal ossicle, the associated meniscal tear should be treated as well.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries; Child; Female; Humans; Knee Injuries; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Menisci, Tibial; Middle Aged; Osteogenesis; Retrospective Studies; Tibial Meniscus Injuries; Young Adult
PubMed: 33128588
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-020-06338-1 -
The American Journal of Sports Medicine Feb 2022Whereas there has been growing interest in surgical repair of posterior medial meniscus root tears (PMMRTs), our understanding of the medium- and long-term results of...
BACKGROUND
Whereas there has been growing interest in surgical repair of posterior medial meniscus root tears (PMMRTs), our understanding of the medium- and long-term results of this procedure is still evolving.
PURPOSE
To report midterm clinical outcomes from PMMRT repairs.
STUDY DESIGN
Systematic review.
METHODS
A literature review for this systematic analysis was performed in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. We identified studies that reported the results of arthroscopic repair of PMMRTs. Functional and imaging outcomes were reviewed and summarized.
RESULTS
In total, 28 studies with a total of 994 patients (83% female) with an overall mean age of 57.1 were included in this review. Clinical outcomes (Lysholm, International Knee Documentation Committee, Hospital for Special Surgery, and Tegner scores) were improved at final follow-up in all studies. Of patients, 49% had radiographic progression of at least 1 grade in the Kellgren-Lawrence scale at a mean follow-up of 4.0 years in 11 studies. Cartilage degeneration had progressed at least 1 grade on magnetic resonance imaging scans in 23% of patients at a mean follow-up of 31.6 months in 4 studies.
CONCLUSION
PMMRT repairs provide a functional benefit with consistent improvements in clinical outcome scores. There is some evidence that PMMRT repair slows the progression of osteoarthritis but does not prevent it at midterm follow-up.
Topics: Arthroscopy; Female; Humans; Knee Joint; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Menisci, Tibial; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Tibial Meniscus Injuries; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 33780278
DOI: 10.1177/0363546521998297 -
The American Journal of Sports Medicine Apr 2024Intact meniscus roots are a prerequisite for normal meniscal function, including even distribution of compressive forces across the knee joint. An injury to the root...
BACKGROUND
Intact meniscus roots are a prerequisite for normal meniscal function, including even distribution of compressive forces across the knee joint. An injury to the root disrupts the hoop strength of the meniscus and may lead to its extrusion and the development of osteoarthritis. A medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT) is often thought to have a primary degenerative pathogenesis. However, there is mention of some cases of MMPRTs where the patients have a solely traumatic injury to a previously healthy meniscus.
PURPOSE
To describe a subpopulation of patients with traumatic MMPRT.
STUDY DESIGN
Systematic review; Level of evidence, 5.
METHODS
The Web of Science database (www.webofscience.com) was queried using the Medical Subject Headings term "medial root tear." Articles were reviewed, and those evaluated for MMPRTs in a degenerative meniscus were excluded. A total of 25 articles describing cases of acute traumatic causes were included in this study. For these articles, the patient characteristics, injury mechanisms, and concomitant injuries evaluated were recorded and pooled.
RESULTS
The search revealed 660 articles, and 25 were selected for inclusion. A total of 113 patients with a traumatic MMPRT were identified and included in this review. The study population had a mean age of 27.1 years and a high share of men (64%). Also, this review displays how most patients with traumatic MMPRTs also suffer concomitant injuries (68%).
CONCLUSION
The findings in this review support our hypothesis that there is a unique subgroup with acute traumatic MMPRTs that have unique patient characteristics, injury mechanisms, and combined injuries, compared with previously published reviews on MMPRTs.
PubMed: 38600780
DOI: 10.1177/03635465241237254 -
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology,... Feb 2023Given the paucity of literature on the re-revision of ACL, the current study was undertaken. The purpose of this systematic review was to synthesise and qualitatively... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Given the paucity of literature on the re-revision of ACL, the current study was undertaken. The purpose of this systematic review was to synthesise and qualitatively assess the currently available evidence in the literature regarding the re-revision of ACL reconstruction (rrACLR).
METHODS
A systematic review was conducted based on the PRISMA guidelines. The following search terms were used in the title, abstract and keywords fields: "ACL" or "anterior cruciate ligament" AND "revision" or "multiple" or "repeat". The outcome data extracted from the studies were the Lysholm score, Subjective IKDC, Marx Score, Tegner, Marx Score, KOOS score, radiological changes and the rate of return to sports. Complications, failures and/or revision surgery were also analysed.
RESULTS
The cohort consisted of 295 patients [191 (64.7%) men and 104 (35.3%) women] with a mean age of 29.9 ± 2.8 years (range 14-58 years) from 10 studies. The mean postoperative follow-up (reported in all studies except one) was 66.9 ± 44.7 months (range 13-230.4 months). Associated injuries were 103 (34.9%) medial meniscus tears, 57 (19.3%) lateral meniscus tears, 14 (4.7%) combined medial plus lateral meniscus tears, 11 (3.7%) meniscal tears (not specified), 252 (85.4%) cartilage lesions, 6 (2.0%) medial collateral ligament injury and 2 (0.7%) lateral collateral ligament injuries. In 47 (15.9%) patients an extra-articular plasty was performed for the anterolateral ligament. In all studies that reported pre- and post-operative IKDC (subjective and objective) and Lysholm score, there was a significant improvement compared to the pre-operative value (p < 0.05). At the final follow-up, laxity measured with KT-1000 was found to be 2.2 ± 0.6 mm. 31 (10.5%) out of 295 patients returned to their pre-injury activity level. A total of 19 (6.4%) re-ruptures were found, while only 4 (1.4%) complications (all minors) were reported, out of which 2 (0.7%) were superficial infections, 1 (0.3%) cyclops lesion and 1 (0.3%) flexion loss.
CONCLUSION
Multiple revisions of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction allow acceptable clinical results and a good degree of knee stability with a low rate of subsequent new re-ruptures but the possibility of regaining pre-injury sports activity is poor; whenever possible, it is preferred to revise the ligament in one stage. This surgery remains a challenge for orthopaedic surgeons and many doubts persist regarding the ideal grafts, additional extra-articular procedures and techniques to use.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
IV.
STUDY REGISTRATION
PROSPERO-CRD42022352164 ( https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ ).
Topics: Male; Humans; Female; Adolescent; Young Adult; Adult; Middle Aged; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries; Anterior Cruciate Ligament; Knee Joint; Knee Injuries; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction; Reoperation; Follow-Up Studies
PubMed: 36224291
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-022-07197-8 -
Tissue Engineering. Part C, Methods Nov 2017Injury to the meniscus is common, but few viable strategies exist for its repair or regeneration. To address this, animal models have been developed to translate new... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Injury to the meniscus is common, but few viable strategies exist for its repair or regeneration. To address this, animal models have been developed to translate new treatment strategies toward the clinic. However, there is not yet a regulatory document guiding such studies. The purpose of this study was to carry out a systematic review of the literature on meniscus treatment methods and outcomes to define the state of the field. Public databases were queried by using search terms related to animal models and meniscus injury and/or repair over the years 1980-2015. Identified peer-reviewed manuscripts were screened by using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. One of nine reviewers read each manuscript and scored them based on whether the publication described a series of predefined study descriptors and outcome measures. Additional data were extracted to identify common assays used. A total of 128 full-length peer-reviewed manuscripts were identified. The number of publications increased over the time frame analyzed, with 48% focused on augmented repair. Rabbit was, by far, the most prevalent species utilized (46%), with dog (21%) and sheep (20%) being the next most common. Analysis of study descriptors revealed that most studies appropriately documented details of the animal used, the surgical approach, and defect and implant characteristics (e.g., 63% of studies identified clearly the defect size). In terms of outcome parameters, most studies carried out macroscopic (85%), histologic (90%), and healing/integration (83%) analyses of the meniscus. However, many studies did not provide further analysis beyond these fundamental measures, and less than 40% reported on the adjacent cartilage and synovium, as well as joint function. There is intense interest in the field of meniscus repair. However, given the current lack of guidance documentation in this area, preclinical animal models are not performed in a standardized fashion. The development of a "Best Practices" document would increase reproducibility and external validity of experiments, while accelerating advancements in translational research. Advancement is of paramount importance given the high prevalence of meniscal injuries and the paucity of effective repair or regenerative strategies.
Topics: Animals; Menisci, Tibial; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Regeneration; Species Specificity; Wound Healing
PubMed: 28622089
DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEC.2017.0080 -
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology,... May 2016To determine the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound (US) in the diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), medial meniscus and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
To determine the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound (US) in the diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), medial meniscus and lateral meniscus tears in people with suspected ACL and/or meniscal tears.
METHODS
MEDLINE, Web of Science and the Cochrane library were searched from inception to March 2014. All prospective studies of the diagnostic accuracy of MRI or US against arthroscopy as the reference standard were included in the systematic review. Studies with a retrospective design and those with evidence of verification bias were excluded. Methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. A meta-analysis of studies evaluating MRI to calculate the pooled sensitivity and specificity for each target condition was performed using a bivariate model with random effects. Sub-group and sensitivity analysis were used to examine the effect of methodological and other study variables.
RESULTS
There were 14 studies included in the meta-analysis of the accuracy of MRI for ACL tears, 19 studies included for medial meniscal tears and 19 studies for lateral meniscal tears. The summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity of MRI were 87 % (95 % CI 77-94 %) and 93 % (95 % CI 91-96 %), respectively, for ACL tears; 89 % (95 % CI 83-94 %) and 88 % (95 % CI 82-93 %), respectively, for medial meniscal tears; and 78 % (95 % CI 66-87 %) and 95 % (95 % CI 91-97 %), respectively, for lateral meniscal tears. Magnetic field strength had no significant effect on accuracy. Most studies had a high or unclear risk of bias. There were an insufficient number of studies that evaluated US to perform a meta-analysis.
CONCLUSION
This study provides a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies of MRI and applies strict exclusion criteria in relation to the risk of verification bias. The risk of bias in most studies is high or unclear in relation to the reference standard. Concerns regarding the applicability of patient selection are also present in most studies.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
III.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries; Arthroscopy; Female; Humans; Knee Joint; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Menisci, Tibial; Middle Aged; Tibial Meniscus Injuries; Young Adult
PubMed: 26614425
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-015-3861-8 -
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage Oct 2014The aim of this review is to describe imaging techniques for evaluation of non-osteochondral structures such as the synovium, menisci in the knee, labrum in the hip,... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this review is to describe imaging techniques for evaluation of non-osteochondral structures such as the synovium, menisci in the knee, labrum in the hip, ligaments and muscles and to review the literature from recent clinical and epidemiological studies of OA.
METHODS
This is a non-systematic narrative review of published literature on imaging of non-osteochondral tissues in OA. PubMed and MEDLINE search for articles published up to 2014, using the keywords osteoarthritis, synovitis, meniscus, labrum, ligaments, plica, muscles, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), scintigraphy, and positron emission tomography (PET).
RESULTS
Published literature showed imaging of non-osteochondral tissues in OA relies primarily on MRI and ultrasound. The use of semiquantitative and quantitative imaging biomarkers of non-osteochondral tissues in clinical and epidemiological OA studies is reported. We highlight studies that have compared both imaging methodologies directly, and those that have established a relationship between imaging biomarkers and clinical outcomes. We provide recommendations as to which imaging protocols should be used to assess disease-specific changes regarding synovium, meniscus in the knee, labrum in the hip, and ligaments, and highlight potential pitfalls in their usage.
CONCLUSION
MRI and ultrasound are currently the most useful imaging modalities for evaluation of non-osteochondral tissues in OA. MRI evaluation of any tissue needs to be performed using appropriate MR pulse sequences. Ultrasound may be particularly useful for evaluation of small joints of the hand. Nuclear medicine and CT play a limited role in imaging of non-osteochondral tissues in OA.
Topics: Diagnostic Imaging; Humans; Ligaments; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Menisci, Tibial; Muscle, Skeletal; Osteoarthritis, Hip; Osteoarthritis, Knee; Positron-Emission Tomography; Radionuclide Imaging; Synovial Membrane; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Ultrasonography
PubMed: 25278069
DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2014.05.001