-
Behavioural Brain Research Aug 2023Alzheimer's disease (AD), a prevalent progressive neurodegenerative disease, is mainly characterized by dementia, memory loss, and cognitive disorder. Rising research... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND AND AIM
Alzheimer's disease (AD), a prevalent progressive neurodegenerative disease, is mainly characterized by dementia, memory loss, and cognitive disorder. Rising research was performed to develop pharmacological or non-pharmacological approaches to treat or improve AD complications. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are stromal cells that can self-renew and exhibit multilineage differentiation. Recent evidence suggested that some of the therapeutic effects of MSCs are mediated by the secreted paracrine factors. These paracrine factors, called MSC- conditioned medium (MSC-CM), may stimulate endogenous repair, promote angio- and artery genesis, and reduce apoptosis through paracrine mechanisms. The current study aims to systematically review the advantages of MSC-CM to the development of research and therapeutic concepts for AD management.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
The present systematic review was performed using PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus from April 2020 to May 2022 following the "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews" (PRISMA) guidelines. The keywords, including "Conditioned medium OR Conditioned media OR Stem cell therapy" AND "Alzheimer's," was searched, and finally, 13 papers were extracted.
RESULTS
The obtained data revealed that MSC-CMs might positively affect neurodegenerative diseases prognosis, especially AD, through various mechanisms, including a decrease in neuro-inflammation, reduction of oxidative stress and Aβ formation, modulation of Microglia function and count, reduction of apoptosis, induction of synaptogenesis and neurogenesis. Also, the results showed that MSC-CM administration could significantly improve cognitive and memory function, increase the expression of neurotrophic factors, decrease the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, improve mitochondrial function, reduce cytotoxicity, and increase neurotransmitter levels.
CONCLUSION
While inhibiting the induction of neuroinflammation could be considered the first therapeutic effect of CMs, the prevention of apoptosis could be regarded as the most crucial effect of CMs on AD improvement.
Topics: Humans; Alzheimer Disease; Culture Media, Conditioned; Neurodegenerative Diseases; Stem Cells; Mesenchymal Stem Cells
PubMed: 37311523
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2023.114543 -
International Journal of Stem Cells May 2018Mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) have emerged as breakthrough treatments for myocardial infarction. However, the efficacy of MSC remains unclear. The aim of the study was to... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) have emerged as breakthrough treatments for myocardial infarction. However, the efficacy of MSC remains unclear. The aim of the study was to evaluate treatment effect of MSC in terms of mechanical, regenerative, and clinical outcomes for patients with myocardial infarction (MI) using meta-analysis.
METHODS
A systematic search and critical review of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane database literature published from inception through December 2017 was performed. The inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials, studies on patients with myocardial infarction, and studies compared with placebo as a control group.
RESULTS
A total of 950 patients from 14 randomized placebo controlled trials were included in the final meta-analysis. MSC treatment showed benefits for mechanical, regenerative, and clinical outcomes. In terms of mechanical outcomes, the LVEF of the MSC treatment group increased by 3.84% (95% CI: 2.32~5.35, ²=43) and the effect was maintained for up to 24 months. Regenerative outcomes were measured by scar mass and WMSI. Scar mass was reduced by -1.13 (95% CI: -1.80 to -0.46, ²=71) and WMSI was reduced by -0.05 (95% CI: -0.07 to -0.03, ²=45) at 6 months after MSC treatment. Mortality rate and incidence of re-hospitalization for HF in MSC group patients trended toward reduced incidence compared to the control group, although this was not statistically significant because of the low event rate.
CONCLUSIONS
The findings of this meta-analysis indicate that MSCs can be beneficial in improving heart function in the treatment of MI. However, the efficacy of MSCs must be further explored through large randomized controlled trials based on rigorous research design.
PubMed: 29482311
DOI: 10.15283/ijsc17061 -
Current Stem Cell Research & Therapy 2021Preclinical and clinical evidence suggests that mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) may be beneficial in treating Heart Failure (HF). However, the effects of stem cell therapy... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Preclinical and clinical evidence suggests that mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) may be beneficial in treating Heart Failure (HF). However, the effects of stem cell therapy in patients with heart failure is an ongoing debate and the safety and efficacy of MSCs therapy are not well-known. We conducted a systematic review of clinical trials that evaluated the safety and efficacy of MSCs for HF. This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of MSCs therapy compared to the placebo in heart failure patients.
METHODS
We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library systematically, with no language restrictions. Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) assessing the influence of MSCs treatment function controlled with placebo in heart failure were included in this analysis. We included RCTs with data on safety and efficacy in patients with heart failure after mesenchymal stem cell transplantation. Two investigators independently searched the articles, extracted data, and assessed the quality of the included studies. Pooled data was performed using the fixed-effect model or random-effect model by the use of Review Manager 5.3. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to assess the bias of included studies. The primary outcome was safely assessed by death and rehospitalization and the secondary outcome was efficacy, which was assessed by six-minute walk distance and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF), Left Ventricular End-systolic Volume (LVESV), Left Ventricular End-diastolic Volume (LVEDV) and Brain Natriuretic Peptide (BNP).
RESULTS
A total of twelve studies were included, involving 823 patients who underwent MSCs or placebo treatment. The overall rate of death showed a trend of reduction of 27% (RR [CI]=0.73 [0.49, 1.09], p=0.12) in the MSCs treatment group. The incidence of rehospitalization was reduced by 47% (RR [CI]=0.53[0.38, 0.75], p=0.0004). The patients in the MSCs treatment group realised an average of 117.01m (MD [95% CI]=117.01m [94.87, 139.14], p<0.00001) improvement in 6MWT. MSCs transplantation significantly improved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) by 5.66 % (MD [95% CI]=5.66 [4.39, 6.92], p<0.00001), decreased Left Ventricular End-Systolic Volume (LVESV) by 14.75 ml (MD [95% CI]=-14.75 [-16.18, - 12.83], p<0.00001) and Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Volume (LVEDV) by 5.78 ml (MD [95% CI]=- 5.78[-12.00, 0.43], p=0.07), in the MSCs group, BNP was decreased by 133.51 pg/ml MD [95% CI]= - 133.51 [-228.17,-38.85], p=0.54, I2= 0.0%) than did in the placebo group.
CONCLUSION
Our results suggested that mesenchymal stem cells as a regenerative therapeutic approach for heart failure are safe and effective by virtue of their self-renewal potential, vast differentiation capacity and immune modulating properties. Allogenic MSCs have superior therapeutic effects and intracoronary injection is the optimum delivery approach. In the tissue origin, patients who received treatment with umbilical cord MSCs seem more effective than bone marrow MSCs. As to dosage injected, (1-10)*10^8 cells were of better effect.
Topics: Heart Failure; Humans; Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation; Mesenchymal Stem Cells; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke Volume; Ventricular Function, Left
PubMed: 32867655
DOI: 10.2174/1574888X15999200820171432 -
Diseases of the Colon and Rectum May 2018There has been a surge in clinical trials studying the safety and efficacy of mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of perianal Crohn's disease. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
There has been a surge in clinical trials studying the safety and efficacy of mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of perianal Crohn's disease.
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this work was to systematically review the literature to determine safety and efficacy of mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of refractory perianal Crohn's disease.
DATA SOURCES
Sources included PubMed, Cochrane Library Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Embase.
STUDY SELECTION
Studies that reported safety and/or efficacy of mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of perianal Crohn's disease were included. Two independent assessors reviewed eligible articles.
INTERVENTION
The study intervention was delivery of mesenchymal stem cells to treat perianal Crohn's disease.
MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES
Safety and efficacy of mesenchymal stem cells used to treat perianal Crohn's disease were measured.
RESULTS
Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review. Three trials with a comparison arm were included in the meta-analysis. There were no significant increases in adverse events (OR = 1.07 (95% CI, 0.61-1.89); p = 0.81) or serious adverse events (OR = 0.53 (95% CI, 0.28-0.98); p = 0.04) in patients treated with mesenchymal stem cells. Mesenchymal stem cells were associated with improved healing as compared with control subjects at primary end points of 6 to 24 weeks (OR = 3.06 (95% CI, 1.05-8.90); p = 0.04) and 24 to 52 weeks (OR = 2.37 (95% CI, 0.90-6.25); p = 0.08).
LIMITATIONS
The study was limited by its multiple centers and heterogeneity in the study inclusion criteria, mesenchymal stem cell origin, dose and frequency of delivery, use of scaffolding, and definition and time point of fistula healing.
CONCLUSIONS
Although there have been only 3 trials conducted with control arms, existing data demonstrate improved efficacy and no increase in adverse or serious adverse events with mesenchymal stem cells as compared with control subjects for the treatment of perianal Crohn's disease.
Topics: Anus Diseases; Crohn Disease; Humans; Injections; Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 29578916
DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001093 -
Journal of Endodontics Jun 2022MicroRNAs (miRNAs), small noncoding RNAs, control the translation of messenger RNAs into proteins. miRNAs have a crucial role in regulating the diverse biological... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
MicroRNAs (miRNAs), small noncoding RNAs, control the translation of messenger RNAs into proteins. miRNAs have a crucial role in regulating the diverse biological processes of many physiological and pathological activities. The aim of this systematic review was to explore various functions of miRNAs in the regulation of dental pulp stem cell (DPSC) behavior.
METHODS
The articles were searched in PubMed, SCOPUS, and ISI Web of Science database using designated keywords. Full-length manuscripts published in English in peer-reviewed journals relevant to the role of miRNAs in DPSC functions were included and reviewed by 2 independent researchers.
RESULTS
The original search of the database generated 299 studies. A total of 102 duplicate studies were removed. After their exclusion, 48 studies were selected for review. miRNAs have shown to modulate the stemness and differentiation of various mesenchymal stem cells. The miRNAs expression profiles in DPSCs were differed compared with other cell types and have been demonstrated to regulate the levels of proteins crucial for promoting or inhibiting DPSC proliferation as well as differentiation. Further, miRNAs also modulate inflammatory processes in dental pulp.
CONCLUSION
miRNAs have various functions on the regulation of DPSCs and understanding these roles of miRNAs is crucial for the development of new therapeutics in regenerative dental medicine. With the advancing technologies, the utilization of miRNA technology could revolutionarily change the future of regenerative endodontics.
Topics: Cell Differentiation; Cell Proliferation; Cells, Cultured; Dental Pulp; Mesenchymal Stem Cells; MicroRNAs; Stem Cells
PubMed: 35271859
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2022.02.012 -
British Medical Bulletin Jun 2023Chronic low back pain, common from the sixth decade, negatively impacts the quality of life of patients and health care systems. Recently, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs)...
BACKGROUND
Chronic low back pain, common from the sixth decade, negatively impacts the quality of life of patients and health care systems. Recently, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been introduced in the management of degenerative discogenic pain. The present study summarizes the current knowledge on the effectiveness of MSCs in patients with discogenic back pain.
SOURCES OF DATA
We performed a systematic review of the literature following the PRISMA guidelines. We searched PubMed and Google Scholar database, and identified 14 articles about management of chronic low back pain with MSCs injection therapy. We recorded information on type of stem cells employed, culture medium, clinical scores and MRI outcomes.
AREAS OF AGREEMENT
We identified a total of 303 patients. Ten studies used bone marrow stem cells. In the other four studies, different stem cells were used (of adipose, umbilical, or chondrocytic origin and a pre-packaged product). The most commonly used scores were Visual Analogue Scale and Oswestry Disability Index.
AREAS OF CONTROVERSY
There are few studies with many missing data.
GROWING POINTS
The studies analysed demonstrate that intradiscal injections of MSCs are effective on discogenic low-back pain. This effect may result from inhibition of nociceptors, reduction of catabolism and repair of injured or degenerated tissues.
AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH
Further research should define the most effective procedure, trying to standardize a single method.
Topics: Humans; Low Back Pain; Quality of Life; Treatment Outcome; Mesenchymal Stem Cells; Magnetic Resonance Imaging
PubMed: 37164906
DOI: 10.1093/bmb/ldad008 -
Neural Regeneration Research Jul 2024Parkinson's disease is characterized by the loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta, and although restoring striatal dopamine levels may...
Parkinson's disease is characterized by the loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta, and although restoring striatal dopamine levels may improve symptoms, no treatment can cure or reverse the disease itself. Stem cell therapy has a regenerative effect and is being actively studied as a candidate for the treatment of Parkinson's disease. Mesenchymal stem cells are considered a promising option due to fewer ethical concerns, a lower risk of immune rejection, and a lower risk of teratogenicity. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the therapeutic effects of mesenchymal stem cells and their derivatives on motor function, memory, and preservation of dopaminergic neurons in a Parkinson's disease animal model. We searched bibliographic databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Scopus, and Web of Science) to identify articles and included only peer-reviewed in vivo interventional animal studies published in any language through June 28, 2023. The study utilized the random-effect model to estimate the 95% confidence intervals (CI) of the standard mean differences (SMD) between the treatment and control groups. We use the systematic review center for laboratory animal experimentation's risk of bias tool and the collaborative approach to meta-analysis and review of animal studies checklist for study quality assessment. A total of 33 studies with data from 840 Parkinson's disease model animals were included in the meta-analysis. Treatment with mesenchymal stem cells significantly improved motor function as assessed by the amphetamine-induced rotational test. Among the stem cell types, the bone marrow MSCs with neurotrophic factor group showed largest effect size (SMD [95% CI] = -6.21 [-9.50 to -2.93], P = 0.0001, I2 = 0.0 %). The stem cell treatment group had significantly more tyrosine hydroxylase positive dopaminergic neurons in the striatum ([95% CI] = 1.04 [0.59 to 1.49], P = 0.0001, I2 = 65.1 %) and substantia nigra (SMD [95% CI] = 1.38 [0.89 to 1.87], P = 0.0001, I2 = 75.3 %), indicating a protective effect on dopaminergic neurons. Subgroup analysis of the amphetamine-induced rotation test showed a significant reduction only in the intracranial-striatum route (SMD [95% CI] = -2.59 [-3.25 to -1.94], P = 0.0001, I2 = 74.4 %). The memory test showed significant improvement only in the intravenous route (SMD [95% CI] = 4.80 [1.84 to 7.76], P = 0.027, I2 = 79.6 %). Mesenchymal stem cells have been shown to positively impact motor function and memory function and protect dopaminergic neurons in preclinical models of Parkinson's disease. Further research is required to determine the optimal stem cell types, modifications, transplanted cell numbers, and delivery methods for these protocols.
PubMed: 38051903
DOI: 10.4103/1673-5374.387976 -
Stem Cell Reviews and Reports Jan 2024Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD) is an inherited genetic disorder characterized by progressive degeneration of muscle tissue, leading to functional disability and... (Review)
Review
Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD) is an inherited genetic disorder characterized by progressive degeneration of muscle tissue, leading to functional disability and premature death. Despite extensive research efforts, the discovery of a cure for DMD continues to be elusive, emphasizing the need to investigate novel treatment approaches. Cellular therapies have emerged as prospective approaches to address the underlying pathophysiology of DMD. This review provides an examination of the present situation regarding cell-based therapies, including CD133 + cells, muscle precursor cells, mesoangioblasts, bone marrow-derived mononuclear cells, mesenchymal stem cells, cardiosphere-derived cells, and dystrophin-expressing chimeric cells. A total of 12 studies were found eligible to be included as they were completed cell therapy clinical trials, clinical applications, or case reports with quantitative results. The evaluation encompassed an examination of limitations and potential advancements in this particular area of research, along with an assessment of the safety and effectiveness of cell-based therapies in the context of DMD. In general, the available data indicates that diverse cell therapy approaches may present a new, safe, and efficacious treatment modality for patients diagnosed with DMD. However, further studies are required to comprehensively understand the most advantageous treatment approach and therapeutic capacity.
Topics: Humans; Muscular Dystrophy, Duchenne; Muscle, Skeletal; Mesenchymal Stem Cells; Treatment Outcome; Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy
PubMed: 37955832
DOI: 10.1007/s12015-023-10653-8 -
Techniques in Coloproctology Jun 2017Anal fistulas continue to be a problem for patients and surgeons alike despite scientific advances. While patient and anatomical characteristics are important to... (Review)
Review
Anal fistulas continue to be a problem for patients and surgeons alike despite scientific advances. While patient and anatomical characteristics are important to surgeons who are evaluating patients with anal fistulas, their development and persistence likely involves a multifaceted interaction of histological, microbiological, and molecular factors. Histological studies have shown that anal fistulas are variably epithelialized and are surrounded by dense collagen tissue with pockets of inflammatory cells. Yet, it remains unknown if or how histological differences impact fistula healing. The presence of a perianal abscess that contains gut flora commonly leads to the development of anal fistula. This implies a microbiological component, but bacteria are infrequently found in chronic fistulas. Recent work has shown an increased expression of proinflammatory cytokines and epithelial to mesenchymal cell transition in both cryptoglandular and Crohn's perianal fistulas. This suggests that molecular mechanisms may also play a role in both fistula development and persistence. The aim of this study was to examine the histological, microbiological, molecular, and host factors that contribute to the development and persistence of anal fistulas.
Topics: Adult; Anal Canal; Chronic Disease; Crohn Disease; Cytokines; Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition; Female; Gastrointestinal Microbiome; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Rectal Fistula
PubMed: 28620877
DOI: 10.1007/s10151-017-1645-5 -
Spine May 2018Systematic review. (Review)
Review
STUDY DESIGN
Systematic review.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study was to investigate, quantify, compare, and compile the various mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) tissue sources within human spinal tissues to act as a compendium for clinical and research application.
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA
Recent years have seen a dramatic increase in academic and clinical understanding of human MSCs. Previously limited to cells isolated from bone marrow, the past decade has illicited the characterization and isolation of human MSCs from adipose, bone marrow, synovium, muscle, periosteum, peripheral blood, umbilical cord, placenta, and numerous other tissues. As researchers explore practical applications of cells in these tissues, the absolute levels of MSCs in specific spinal tissue will be critical to guide future research.
METHODS
The PubMED, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched for articles relating to the harvest, characterization, isolation, and quantification of human MSCs from spinal tissues. Selected articles were examined for relevant data, categorized according to type of spinal tissue, and when possible, standardized to facilitate comparisons between sites.
RESULTS
Human MSC levels varied widely between spinal tissues. Yields for intervertebral disc demonstrated roughly 5% of viable cells to be positive for MSC surface markers. Cartilage endplate cells yielded 18,500 to 61,875 cells/0.8 mm thick sample of cartilage end plate. Ligamentum flavum yielded 250,000 to 500,000 cells/g of tissue. Annulus fibrosus fluorescence activated cell sorting treatment found 29% of cells positive for MSC marker Stro-1. Nucleus pulposus yielded mean tissue samples of 40,584 to 234,137 MSCs per gram of tissue.
CONCLUSION
Numerous tissues within and surrounding the spine represent a consistent and reliable source for the harvest and isolation of human MSCs. Among the tissues of the spine, the annulus fibrosus and ligamentum flavum each offer considerable levels of MSCs, and may prove comparable to that of bone marrow.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
5.
Topics: Animals; Bone Marrow; Cell Differentiation; Humans; Intervertebral Disc; Ligamentum Flavum; Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation; Mesenchymal Stem Cells; Periosteum; Spinal Cord
PubMed: 28885289
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002401