-
Wound Repair and Regeneration :... Jul 2019A systematic review and meta-analysis were undertaken in order to explore the influence of matrix metalloproteinases and their diagnostic methods in chronic and acute... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
A systematic review and meta-analysis were undertaken in order to explore the influence of matrix metalloproteinases and their diagnostic methods in chronic and acute wounds. Searches were conducted in the PubMed (Medline) and Embase (Elsevier) databases from inception to late November 2017. We included clinical trials enrolling patients with cutaneous chronic and acute wounds where a validated diagnostic method was employed for metalloproteinases. We excluded in vitro, animal or preclinical studies, nonoriginal articles, and studies without available data for analysis. In addition, references of narrative and systematic reviews were scrutinized for additional articles. Eight studies met the inclusion criteria. Results revealed that the most frequently determined matrix metalloproteinases were MMP-2 and MMP-9, and were found in 54.5% of wounds. MMP-9 was present in more than 50% of the chronic wounds with a range from 37 to 78%. However, metalloproteinases were found in only 20% of acute wounds, and other types of metalloproteinases were also observed (MMP-2 and MMP-3). On the basis of the available evidence, high levels of metalloproteinases have been correlated with significantly delayed wound healing in wounds of a variety of etiologies.
Topics: Humans; Matrix Metalloproteinases; Wound Healing; Wounds and Injuries
PubMed: 30873727
DOI: 10.1111/wrr.12717 -
Hand (New York, N.Y.) Jan 2023A systematic review and meta-analysis of case-control animal model studies will help clarify the vascular effects of botulinum toxin (BTX). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Botulinum Toxin A and B Improve Perfusion, Increase Flap Survival, Cause Vasodilation, and Prevent Thrombosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Controlled Animal Studies.
BACKGROUND
A systematic review and meta-analysis of case-control animal model studies will help clarify the vascular effects of botulinum toxin (BTX).
METHODS
Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were used to identify all animal case-control studies published before September 13, 2020, evaluating the vascular effects of BTX. Primary parameters included the following: perfusion, flap survival, arterial and venous dilation, and arterial and venous thrombosis.
RESULTS
Thirty-six studies with 1032 animals met the systematic review inclusion criteria. Twenty-nine studies had quantifiable data for statistical analysis. Statistically significant increases in perfusion with BTX over saline were detected within 1 day and sustained up to 8 weeks. The following represent weighted mean data from the meta-analysis. The administration of BTX has a 26% increase in both random pattern and pedicled flap survival area over controls. Botulinum toxin causes vasodilation. Botulinum toxin increases vessel diameter in arteries by 40% and in veins by 46% compared with saline controls. The administration of BTX reduces thrombosis by 85% in arteries and by 79% in veins compared with saline controls. Vascular effects were consistent across both BTX-A and BTX-B serotypes, multiple animal species, and various doses. No clear relationships between vascular effects and BTX pretreatment time were identified.
CONCLUSIONS
Perivascular BTX administration intraoperatively or as a chemical delay pretreatment several days before surgery in multiple animal species and models shows multiple changes to the vascular system. Extrapolation of lessons learned from this systematic review and meta-analysis of animal models could expand research and clinical use of BTX in human vascular disease and surgery.
Topics: Animals; Humans; Botulinum Toxins, Type A; Vasodilation; Surgical Flaps; Perfusion; Thrombosis
PubMed: 33645294
DOI: 10.1177/1558944721994250 -
International Journal of Molecular... Sep 2015Pre-eclampsia (PE) complicates 2%-8% of all pregnancies and is an important cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality worldwide. In order to reduce these complications... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Pre-eclampsia (PE) complicates 2%-8% of all pregnancies and is an important cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality worldwide. In order to reduce these complications and to develop possible treatment modalities, it is important to identify women at risk of developing PE. The use of biomarkers in early pregnancy would allow appropriate stratification into high and low risk pregnancies for the purpose of defining surveillance in pregnancy and to administer interventions. We used formal methods for a systematic review and meta-analyses to assess the accuracy of all biomarkers that have been evaluated so far during the first and early second trimester of pregnancy to predict PE. We found low predictive values using individual biomarkers which included a disintegrin and metalloprotease 12 (ADAM-12), inhibin-A, pregnancy associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A), placental growth factor (PlGF) and placental protein 13 (PP-13). The pooled sensitivity of all single biomarkers was 0.40 (95% CI 0.39-0.41) at a false positive rate of 10%. The area under the Summary of Receiver Operating Characteristics Curve (SROC) was 0.786 (SE 0.02). When a combination model was used, the predictive value improved to an area under the SROC of 0.893 (SE 0.03). In conclusion, although there are multiple potential biomarkers for PE their efficacy has been inconsistent and comparisons are difficult because of heterogeneity between different studies. Therefore, there is an urgent need for high quality, large-scale multicentre research in biomarkers for PE so that the best predictive marker(s) can be identified in order to improve the management of women destined to develop PE.
Topics: ADAM Proteins; ADAM12 Protein; Biomarkers; Female; Galectins; Humans; Inhibins; Membrane Proteins; Placenta Growth Factor; Pre-Eclampsia; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Proteins; Pregnancy-Associated Plasma Protein-A
PubMed: 26404264
DOI: 10.3390/ijms160923035 -
Toxins Sep 2023The aim of this paper is to provide a systematic review of the literature regarding the clinical use of botulinum toxin (BTX) to treat various orofacial neuropathic pain... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
The aim of this paper is to provide a systematic review of the literature regarding the clinical use of botulinum toxin (BTX) to treat various orofacial neuropathic pain disorders (NP).
METHODS
A comprehensive literature search was conducted using Medline, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases. Only randomized clinical trials (RCT) published between 2003 and the end of June 2023, investigating the use of BTX to treat NP, were selected. PICO guidelines were used to select and tabulate the articles.
RESULTS
A total of 6 RCTs were selected. Five articles used BTX injections to treat classical trigeminal neuralgia, and one to treat post-herpetic neuralgia. A total of 795 patients received BTX injections. The selected studies utilised different doses and methods of injections and doses. All the selected studies concluded superiority of BTX injections over placebo for reducing pain levels, and 5 out 6 of them highlighted an improvement in the patient's quality of life. Most of the studies reported transient and mild side effects.
CONCLUSION
There is evidence of the efficacy of BTX injections in orofacial pain management. However, improved study protocols are required to provide direction for the clinical use of BTX to treat various orofacial neuropathic pain disorders.
Topics: Humans; Botulinum Toxins; Facial Pain; Trigeminal Neuralgia; Databases, Factual; Neuralgia
PubMed: 37755967
DOI: 10.3390/toxins15090541 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jan 2018Gilles de la Tourette syndrome, or Tourette's syndrome, is defined as the presence of both motor and vocal (phonic) tics for more than 12 months, that manifest before... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Gilles de la Tourette syndrome, or Tourette's syndrome, is defined as the presence of both motor and vocal (phonic) tics for more than 12 months, that manifest before the age of 18 years, in the absence of secondary causes. Treatment of motor and phonic tics is difficult and challenging.
OBJECTIVES
To determine the safety and effectiveness of botulinum toxin in treating motor and phonic tics in people with Tourette's syndrome, and to analyse the effect of botulinum toxin on premonitory urge and sensory tics.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Movement Disorders Group Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and two trials registers to 25 October 2017. We reviewed reference lists of relevant articles for additional trials.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We considered all randomised, controlled, double-blind studies comparing botulinum toxin to placebo or other medications for the treatment of motor and phonic tics in Tourette's syndrome for this review. We sought both parallel group and cross-over studies of children or adults, at any dose, and for any duration.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We followed standard Cochrane methods to select studies, assess risk of bias, extract and analyse data. All authors independently abstracted data onto standardized forms; disagreements were resolved by mutual discussion.
MAIN RESULTS
Only one randomised placebo-controlled, double-blind cross-over study met our selection criteria. In this study, 20 participants with motor tics were enrolled over a three-year recruitment period; 18 (14 of whom had a diagnosis of Tourette's syndrome) completed the study; in total, 21 focal motor tics were treated. Although we considered most bias domains to be at low risk of bias, the study recruited a small number of participants with relatively mild tics and provided limited data for our key outcomes. The effects of botulinum toxin injections on tic frequency, measured by videotape or rated subjectively, and on premonitory urge, are uncertain (very low-quality evidence). The quality of evidence for adverse events following botulinum toxin was very low. Nine people had muscle weakness following the injection, which could have led to unblinding of treatment group assignment. No data were available to evaluate whether botulinum injections led to immunoresistance to botulinum.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
We are uncertain about botulinum toxin effects in the treatment of focal motor and phonic tics in select cases, as we assessed the quality of the evidence as very low. Additional randomised controlled studies are needed to demonstrate the benefits and harms of botulinum toxin therapy for the treatment of motor and phonic tics in patients with Tourette's syndrome.
Topics: Botulinum Toxins, Type A; Humans; Neuromuscular Agents; Tics; Time Factors; Tourette Syndrome
PubMed: 29304272
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012285.pub2 -
Toxins Mar 2023Accurate targeting of overactive muscles is fundamental for successful botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) injections in the treatment of spasticity. The necessity of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Accurate targeting of overactive muscles is fundamental for successful botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) injections in the treatment of spasticity. The necessity of instrumented guidance and the superiority of one or more guidance techniques are ambiguous. Here, we sought to investigate if guided BoNT injections lead to a better clinical outcome in adults with limb spasticity compared to non-guided injections. We also aimed to elucidate the hierarchy of common guidance techniques including electromyography, electrostimulation, manual needle placement and ultrasound. To this end, we conducted a Bayesian network meta-analysis and systematic review with 245 patients using the MetaInsight software, R and the Cochrane Review Manager. Our study provided, for the first time, quantitative evidence supporting the superiority of guided BoNT injections over the non-guided ones. The hierarchy comprised ultrasound on the first level, electrostimulation on the second, electromyography on the third and manual needle placement on the last level. The difference between ultrasound and electrostimulation was minor and, thus, appropriate contextualization is essential for decision making. Taken together, guided BoNT injections based on ultrasound and electrostimulation performed by experienced practitioners lead to a better clinical outcome within the first month post-injection in adults with limb spasticity. In the present study, ultrasound performed slightly better, but large-scale trials should shed more light on which modality is superior.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Bayes Theorem; Botulinum Toxins, Type A; Injections, Intramuscular; Muscle Spasticity; Network Meta-Analysis; Neuromuscular Agents; Neurotoxins; Stroke; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37104194
DOI: 10.3390/toxins15040256 -
International Urology and Nephrology Jan 2016The aim of this study was to overcome the limitation of overlooking the placebo effect in previous studies and to demonstrate the overall treatment efficacy and safety... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
The aim of this study was to overcome the limitation of overlooking the placebo effect in previous studies and to demonstrate the overall treatment efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) compared with placebo.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the published literature in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase reporting on BTX use in lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS)/benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH). Single-group analysis for the placebo effect and meta-regression analysis for the moderator effect were performed with high-quality RCTs compared with placebo.
RESULTS
A total of three studies were included, with a total sample size of 522 subjects (260 subjects in the experimental group and 262 subjects in the control group). Study duration ranged from 8 to 24 weeks. The pooled overall SMD in the mean change in IPSS for the BTX-A group versus the placebo group was -1.02 (95 % CI -1.97, -0.07). The other outcomes (Q max, prostate volume, and post-voided residual volume) were not statistically different between the two groups. The placebo effect in single-group analysis ranged from 0 to 27.9 % for IPSS, and from -1.1 to 28.7 % for Q max (lowest to highest, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS
This evidence-based systematic review and meta-analysis of the BTX-A injection for LUTS/BPH showed no differences in efficacy compared with placebo and also showed no difference in procedure-related adverse events occurred. Thus, the results of this study do not provide evidence of clinical benefits of using the BTX-A injection for LUTS/BPH in real clinical practice.
Topics: Botulinum Toxins, Type A; Humans; Injections; Male; Neuromuscular Agents; Prostatic Hyperplasia; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 26560471
DOI: 10.1007/s11255-015-1153-3 -
Journal of Clinical Neuroscience :... Jan 2022Botulinum toxin (BTX) is a neurotoxin that has been used to treat various disorders and has also become a popular choice for cosmetic indications, yet traditionally,... (Review)
Review
Botulinum toxin (BTX) is a neurotoxin that has been used to treat various disorders and has also become a popular choice for cosmetic indications, yet traditionally, myasthenia gravis (MG) is considered a contraindication for BTX. To determine whether BTX should be avoided in MG patients, clinical data from our MG and dystonia specialist clinic were analyzed retrospectively. In addition, a systematic literature review was conducted to identify all published cases associated with the co-existence of MG and BTX treatments. Here, we described one patient from our clinic, who received BTX injections before being given MG diagnosis. After the literature review, 8 cases with subclinical MG previously treated with BTX for dystonia or cosmetic reasons ("BTX injections before MG diagnosis") were identified. Markedly, 8 out of 8 (100%) patients developed obvious muscle weakness. In contrast, 10 patients presenting MG as comorbidity had received BTX for dystonia or overactive bladder ("BTX injection after MG diagnosis"), and 8 out of 10 (80%) experienced improved symptoms through appropriate dose modifications and adequate treatment for MG before receiving BTX injections. These findings support that, under proper management of co-existing MG, BTX could be used safely and successfully in patients presenting MG comorbidities in the future.
Topics: Botulinum Toxins, Type A; Contraindications; Dystonia; Humans; Myasthenia Gravis; Neuromuscular Agents; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 34929650
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2021.11.010 -
European Journal of Neurology Jan 2022Sialorrhea often happens in patients with neurologic disorders, and botulinum toxin (BoNT), which inhibits acetylcholine activation, may be an effective treatment for... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Sialorrhea often happens in patients with neurologic disorders, and botulinum toxin (BoNT), which inhibits acetylcholine activation, may be an effective treatment for drooling. This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of BoNT in adults and children with sialorrhea due to neurological disorders.
METHODS
The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for relevant studies published before August 2021. The pooled estimate of outcomes was calculated using a random effect model.
RESULTS
The review included 17 studies involving 981 patients. Compared with placebo, both BoNT type A (BoNT-A) and BoNT type B (BoNT-B) alleviated drooling frequency and severity (mean difference, 95% CI; BoNT-A: -1.20, -1.89 to -0.51; BoNT-B: -1.62, -2.07 to -1.17), reduced saliva weight (BoNT-A: -1.70, -2.30 to -1.10; BoNT-B: -1.12, -1.97 to -0.27), and improved global impression of change (BoNT-A: -1.30, -1.73 to -0.86; BoNT-B: -1.58, -1.95 to -1.21) in adults 4 weeks postinjection. BoNT-B remained effective at 12 weeks. In children, BoNT-A and BoNT-B alleviated sialorrhea symptoms (BoNT-A: -1.63, -2.42 to -0.85; BoNT-B: -5.20, -6.03 to -4.37) and BoNT-A reduced saliva weight (-0.77, -1.54 to 0.00) at 4 weeks postinjection. After 12 weeks, BoNT-B remained efficacious. Most adverse effects (AEs) were mild to moderate and self-limited.
CONCLUSIONS
There is moderate certainty of evidence (COE) that either BoNT-A or BoNT-B could relieve sialorrhea after 4 and 12 weeks of follow-up without significantly more severe AEs in adults. However, the COE is very low to low in children.
Topics: Botulinum Toxins, Type A; Child; Humans; Neuromuscular Agents; Sialorrhea; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 34449931
DOI: 10.1111/ene.15083 -
Dermatologic Therapy Jan 2022Hyperhidrosis impairs quality of life (QOL) in hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) patients and may exacerbate HS. However, there is limited literature on whether... (Review)
Review
Hyperhidrosis impairs quality of life (QOL) in hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) patients and may exacerbate HS. However, there is limited literature on whether hyperhidrosis treatments improve HS disease. To systematically review literature on efficacy and tolerability of hyperhidrosis treatments in HS patients. In May 2021, MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were systematically searched by two reviewers per PRISMA guidelines for articles on hyperhidrosis and HS. Sixteen articles met inclusion criteria (2 randomized controlled trials [RCTs], one case-control study, three cross-sectional studies, 10 case-studies/series), encompassing 252 HS patients across studies. They examined botulinum toxin A (BTX-A) (n = 6) and B (BTX-B) (n = 1), suction-curettage (n = 1), diode laser (n = 1), and microwave-based energy device (MED) (n = 3). Overall, BTX treatments improve HS severity, QOL, hyperhidrosis, and were well-tolerated. Suction-curettage did not improve disease. One HS patient tolerated diode laser well, with improvement in sweating and HS. One RCT studying MED was discontinued due to adverse events. Two studies reported MED-induced HS. BTX was overall helpful in HS patients, including in patients without concomitant hyperhidrosis. However, more prospective studies are needed to examine its utility in HS. There is potential harm of MEDs in HS. Most studies examining hyperhidrosis treatments in HS patients are low level of evidence. Larger RCTs should examine the efficacy and tolerability of hyperhidrosis treatments in HS.
Topics: Botulinum Toxins, Type A; Case-Control Studies; Hidradenitis Suppurativa; Humans; Hyperhidrosis; Quality of Life
PubMed: 34796606
DOI: 10.1111/dth.15210