-
World Journal of Surgery Apr 2018Distant metastasis (DM) is not a frequent event in differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) but has an adverse impact on mortality of patients with DTC. In the current... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
Distant metastasis (DM) is not a frequent event in differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) but has an adverse impact on mortality of patients with DTC. In the current study, we aimed to conduct a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the risk factors for DM in DTCs and for each histological subtype.
METHODS
Five electronic databases were searched from inception to December 2016 for relevant articles. Pooled odd ratios and 95% confidence interval were calculated using random-effect model.
RESULTS
Thirty-four articles with 73,219 patients were included for meta-analyses. In DTCs, male gender, age ≥45 years, tumor size ≥4 cm, multifocality, vascular invasion (VI), extrathyroidal extension (ETE), lymph node metastasis (LNM), and lateral LNM were demonstrated to be associated with significant risks for DM. In addition, several clinicopathological factors such as age ≥45 years, VI, ETE, and LNM were shown to be significant risk factors for DM in both PTC and FTC subgroups.
CONCLUSION
Our study demonstrated the promising value of several clinicopathological factors such as male gender, older age, VI, ETE, and LNM in predicting DM in PTCs and FTCs. Our study affirms the value of the selected clinicopathological factors for tumor risk stratification and assessment of patients' prognosis.
Topics: Carcinoma; Databases, Factual; Humans; Lymphatic Metastasis; Models, Statistical; Neoplasm Invasiveness; Neoplasm Metastasis; Odds Ratio; Prognosis; Risk Factors; Thyroid Neoplasms
PubMed: 28913696
DOI: 10.1007/s00268-017-4206-1 -
The British Journal of Surgery Feb 2016Axillary reverse mapping (ARM) assesses the lymphatic drainage of the arm simultaneously with that of the breast, enabling preservation of arm lymphatics during axillary... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Axillary reverse mapping (ARM) assesses the lymphatic drainage of the arm simultaneously with that of the breast, enabling preservation of arm lymphatics during axillary surgery for breast cancer. This article systematically reviews the evidence on the lymphoedema rate and oncological safety of the ARM technique.
METHODS
PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched systematically for studies that addressed the use of ARM during axillary surgery in breast cancer. Studies were eligible if they performed ARM during sentinel node biopsy (SNB) or axillary node clearance (ANC) for breast cancer in prospective studies of more than 50 patients, with assessment of lymphoedema and oncological outcomes during a minimum follow-up of 6 months.
RESULTS
Eight studies reported data on ARM in 1142 patients undergoing axillary surgery for breast cancer. Lymphoedema rates ranged from 0 to 6 per cent during ARM-assisted SNB, and from 5.9 to 24 per cent during ARM lymphatic preservation at ANC. Crossover nodes between the arm and breast lymphatics were identified in 0-10 per cent of patients, and metastases were present in 0-20 per cent of these patients. ARM nodes were not preserved in between 11 and 18 per cent of patients with ARM nodes identified, and metastases were detected in 0-19 per cent of these patients.
CONCLUSION
ARM can achieve low rates of lymphoedema, but the risk of metastasis in crossover and clinically suspicious ARM nodes, or those in close proximity to an involved sentinel node, warrants their excision.
Topics: Axilla; Breast Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Lymph Nodes; Lymphatic Metastasis; Neoplasm Staging; Prognosis; Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy
PubMed: 26661686
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10041 -
PloS One 2018Small cell carcinoma of the cervix (SCCC) is a rare primary neuroendocrine cervical carcinoma with a high degree of invasiveness. SCCC is prone to early-stage lymph node... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Influence of clinicopathological characteristics and comprehensive treatment models on the prognosis of small cell carcinoma of the cervix: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Small cell carcinoma of the cervix (SCCC) is a rare primary neuroendocrine cervical carcinoma with a high degree of invasiveness. SCCC is prone to early-stage lymph node and distant metastases and characterized by a poor prognosis. Currently, there is no standard treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the clinicopathological factors and treatment models that influence SCCC prognosis through a systematic review and meta-analysis, to improve the diagnosis and treatment of SCCC. A comprehensive search was performed in multiple medical literature databases to retrieve studies on the clinical prognosis of SCCC published in China and abroad as of March 1, 2017. Twenty cohort studies with 1904 patients were analyzed. Meta-analysis showed statistical significance for the following factors: FIGO staging (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.63, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.13-3.24; odds ratio [OR] = 3.72, 95% CI: 2.46-5.62), tumor size (HR = 1.64, 95% CI: 1.25-2.15), parametrial involvement (HR = 2.40, 95% CI: 1.43-4.05), resection margin (HR = 4.09, 95% CI: 2.27-7.39), lymph node metastasis (OR = 2.09, 95% CI: 1.18-3.71), depth of stromal invasion (HR = 1.99, 95% CI: 1.33-2.97), neoadjuvant chemotherapy (HR = 2.06, 95% CI: 1.14-3.73), and adjuvant chemotherapy (HR = 1.63, 95% CI: 1.26-2.12; OR = 1.48, 95% CI: 1.02-2.16). FIGO staging, tumor size, parametrial involvement, resection margin, depth of stromal invasion, and lymph node metastasis can be used as clinicopathological characteristics for the prediction of SCCC prognosis. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy tended to improve prognosis. Our findings suggest that neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus adjuvant chemotherapy may be the preferred strategy. However, adjuvant radiotherapy appeared to cause no significant improvement in prognosis. Therefore, the clinical application of radiotherapy and the relationship between radiotherapy and clinicopathological factors need to be re-examined. The results of this study should be validated and developed in formal, well-designed multicenter clinical trials.
Topics: Carcinoma, Small Cell; Cervix Uteri; Female; Humans; Lymphatic Metastasis; Neoplasm Invasiveness; Neoplasm Staging; Prognosis; Treatment Outcome; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
PubMed: 29641578
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192784 -
PloS One 2017The epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) is one of the most commonly used markers of cancer stem cells (CSCs), but the clinical and prognostic significance of EpCAM... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES
The epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) is one of the most commonly used markers of cancer stem cells (CSCs), but the clinical and prognostic significance of EpCAM in gastric cancer (GC) remains disputable. Motivated by heterogeneous and inconclusive results, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to systematically summarize and elucidate the association between EpCAM overexpression and GC patients.
METHODS
The PubMed, Cochrane Library, Medline, Web of Knowledge and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases were searched to identify relevant studies. The RevMan 5.3 software was used for the meta-analysis. Fixed-effects or random-effects models were applied depending on the presence of heterogeneity. The pooled odds ratio (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were applied to estimate the associations between EpCAM and gastric cancer. For the significant heterogeneity studies, sensitivity analyses were applied based on the population to test the robustness of the pooled results and identify possible sources of heterogeneity.
RESULTS
A total of 11 studies including 1960 GC patients met our inclusion criteria. The results of the meta-analyses revealed that there were significant differences in EpCAM overexpression and tumour size (OR = 2.97, 95% CI: 2.13~4.13, P < 0.00001), the nature of the tissue (OR = 80.30, 95% CI: 29.21~220.81, P < 0.00001), lymph node metastasis (OR = 2.78, 95% CI: 1.23~6.27, P = 0.01), and the cumulative 5-year overall survival rate (OR = 0.54, 95% CI:0.29~0.99, P = 0.05). No significant associations were identified between EpCAM overexpression and gender (OR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.66~1.19, P = 0.43), age (OR = 1.13, 95% CI: 0.58~2.20, P = 0.73), tumour stage (OR = 2.26, 95% CI: 0.79~6.45, P = 0.13), distant metastasis (OR = 2.15, 95% CI: 0.20~22.69, P = 0.52), TNM stage (OR = 5.14, 95% CI: 0.77~34.37, P = 0.09), Lauren type (OR = 1.18, 95% CI: 0.08~16.45, P = 0.9), differentiation (OR = 1.88, 95% CI: 0.65~5.41, P = 0.24). However, due to significant heterogeneity in tumor stage, lymph node metastasis, TNM stage, differentiation and Lauren type, these results should be taken carefully.
CONCLUSIONS
The meta-analysis demonstrated that the expression of EpCAM in the gastric cancer group was greater than that in the control group. Moreover, EpCAM overexpression was associated with larger tumour size, lymphnode metastasis and worse prognosis in gastric cancer. Due to significant heterogeneity, the sensitivity analysis suggests that population factor may be an important source of heterogeneity, and these results should be treated with caution. EpCAM may be useful as a novel prognostic factor, and large-scale and well-designed studies are needed to validate our results in the future.
Topics: Biomarkers, Tumor; Epithelial Cell Adhesion Molecule; Gastric Mucosa; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Humans; Lymphatic Metastasis; Prognosis; Stomach; Stomach Neoplasms; Up-Regulation
PubMed: 28403178
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175357 -
European Journal of Cancer (Oxford,... May 2022Local treatment (metastasectomy or stereotactic radiotherapy) for oligometastatic disease (OMD) in patients with esophagogastric cancer may improve overall survival... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Local treatment (metastasectomy or stereotactic radiotherapy) for oligometastatic disease (OMD) in patients with esophagogastric cancer may improve overall survival (OS). The primary aim was to identify definitions of esophagogastric OMD. A secondary aim was to perform a meta-analysis of OS after local treatment versus systemic therapy alone for OMD.
METHODS
Studies and study protocols reporting on definitions or OS after local treatment for esophagogastric OMD were included. The primary outcome was the maximum number of organs/lesions considered OMD and the maximum number of lesions per organ (i.e. 'organ-specific' OMD burden). Agreement was considered to be either absent/poor (< 50%), fair (50%-75%), or consensus (≥ 75%). The secondary outcome was the pooled adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) for OS after local treatment versus systemic therapy alone. The ROBINS tool was used for quality assessment.
RESULTS
A total of 97 studies, including 7 study protocols, and 2 prospective studies, were included. OMD was considered in 1 organ with ≤ 3 metastases (consensus). 'Organ-specific' OMD burden could involve bilobar ≤ 3 liver metastases, unilateral ≤ 2 lung metastases, 1 extra-regional lymph node station, ≤ 2 brain metastases, or bilateral adrenal gland metastases (consensus). Local treatment for OMD was associated with improved OS compared with systemic therapy alone based on 6 non-randomized studies (pooled aHR 0.47, 95% CI: 0.30-0.74) and for liver oligometastases based on 5 non-randomized studies (pooled aHR 0.39, 95% CI: 0.22-0.59). All studies scored serious risk of bias.
CONCLUSIONS
Current literature considers esophagogastric cancer spread limited to 1 organ with ≤ 3 metastases or 1 extra-regional lymph node station to be OMD. Local treatment for OMD appeared associated with improved OS compared with systemic therapy alone. Prospective randomized trials are warranted.
Topics: Esophageal Neoplasms; Humans; Metastasectomy; Neoplasm Metastasis; Prospective Studies; Radiosurgery; Stomach Neoplasms
PubMed: 35339868
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.02.018 -
Thyroid : Official Journal of the... Mar 2015Renal cell carcinoma can metastasize to uncommon sites, for example, the thyroid gland where metastases are rarely found. To determine the patient survival and the time... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Renal cell carcinoma can metastasize to uncommon sites, for example, the thyroid gland where metastases are rarely found. To determine the patient survival and the time between cancer diagnosis and thyroid metastasis, we analyzed a large patient cohort from our hospital records and performed a systematic review.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Patients diagnosed between 1978 and 2007 with thyroid metastases from renal cell carcinoma were retrospectively identified from the hospital database. A systematic literature search was performed for publications describing at least three cases of thyroid metastasis from renal cell carcinoma. Case data from the identified studies were collected and used to determine the survival data.
RESULTS
We identified 34 patients (19 females) from our hospital records with a mean age of 67 years (range, 33-79) when thyroid metastasis was diagnosed. Median time to primary metastasis after resection of renal cell carcinoma was 6.5 years (range, 0-25) with a single case of synchronous metastasis. Median survival after primary metastasis was 4.7 years (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.8-7.6). The systematic review included 32 studies with 285 patients. Case data could be extracted for 202 patients. Median time to thyroid metastasis (without synchronous cases) was 8.8 years (95% CI: 7.5-10.1). Median actuarial survival after thyroid metastasis was 3.4 years (95% CI: 2.2-4.6). Total thyroidectomy was not associated with a better survival compared to partial thyroidectomies.
CONCLUSIONS
Time to thyroid metastasis of renal cell carcinoma can be very long, and survival after thyroidectomy is favorable compared to metastasis to other sites.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Female; Humans; Incidence; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Kidney Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Metastasis; Nephrectomy; Retrospective Studies; Thyroid Neoplasms; Thyroidectomy; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 25491306
DOI: 10.1089/thy.2014.0498 -
PloS One 2016In the era of somatostatin analogues and targeted therapies, the role of chemotherapy in NET remains largely undefined. This systematic review aimed to assess the effect... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES
In the era of somatostatin analogues and targeted therapies, the role of chemotherapy in NET remains largely undefined. This systematic review aimed to assess the effect of chemotherapy on response rates (RR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicity compared to other chemotherapies/systemic therapies or best supportive care in patients with advanced or metastatic NET.
METHODS
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) from 1946 to 2015 were identified from MEDLINE, EMBASE, other databases and conference proceedings. Review of abstracts, quality assessment and data abstraction were performed independently by two investigators. Meta-analyses were conducted using Mantel-Haenszel analysis with random-effects modelling.
RESULTS
Six RCTs comparing standard streptozotocin plus 5-fluorouacil (STZ/5FU) chemotherapy to other chemotherapy regimens, and 2 comparing this to interferon (IFN) were included. Only 1 study was considered at low risk of bias. STZ/5-FU was no different to other chemotherapies in response rate [RR 0.96; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72-1.27], PFS (RR 0.95; CI 0.81-1.13), or OS (RR 1.03; CI 0.77-1.39). IFN may produce higher response than STZ/5FU (RR 0.20; CI 0.04-1.13), but event rates were small and survival was no different. Interferon was associated with higher overall haematological (RR 0.47; CI 0.27-0.82) and lower overall renal toxicity (RR 3.61; CI 1.24-10.51).
CONCLUSION
Strong evidence is lacking in the area of chemotherapy in neuroendocrine tumors. There is currently no evidence that one chemotherapeutic regimen is significantly better than the other, nor is interferon better than chemotherapy. There is an urgent need to design RCTs comparing modern chemotherapy to other agents in NET.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Disease-Free Survival; Fluorouracil; Humans; Interferons; Neoplasm Metastasis; Neuroendocrine Tumors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Somatostatin; Streptozocin; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 27362760
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158140 -
European Journal of Surgical Oncology :... Nov 2018The central compartment is a common site for nodal spread from differentiated thyroid carcinoma, often occurring in patients without clinical or ultrasonographic (US)... (Review)
Review
The central compartment is a common site for nodal spread from differentiated thyroid carcinoma, often occurring in patients without clinical or ultrasonographic (US) evidence of neck lymph node metastasis (cN0). However, the role of elective central compartment neck dissection (CND) among patients with DTC remains controversial. We performed a systematic literature review, also including review of international guidelines, with discussion of anatomic and technical aspects, as well as risks and benefits of performing elective CND. The recent literature does not uniformly support or refute elective CND in patients with DTC, and therefore an individualized approach is warranted which considers individual surgeon experience, including individual recurrence and complication rates. Patients (especially older males) with large tumors (>4 cm) and extrathyroidal extension are more likely to benefit from elective CND, but elective CND also increases risk for hypoparathyroidism and recurrent nerve injury, especially when operated by low-volume surgeons. Individual surgeons who perform elective CND must ensure the number of central compartment dissections needed to prevent one recurrence (number needed to treat) is not disproportionate to their individual number of central compartment dissections per related complication (number needed to harm).
Topics: Decision Making; Humans; Lymphatic Metastasis; Neck Dissection; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Postoperative Complications; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Risk Factors; Thyroid Neoplasms
PubMed: 30145001
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.08.005 -
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy May 2020Metastasis to the gastrostomy site in patients with upper aerodigestive tract (UADT) malignancies is a rare but devastating adverse event that has been poorly described.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
Metastasis to the gastrostomy site in patients with upper aerodigestive tract (UADT) malignancies is a rare but devastating adverse event that has been poorly described. Our aim was to determine the overall incidence and clinicopathologic characteristics observed with development of gastrostomy site metastasis in patients with UADT cancers.
METHODS
This was a systematic review and meta-analysis of 6138 studies retrieved from Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Register after being queried for studies including gastrostomy site metastasis in patients with UADT malignancies.
RESULTS
The final analysis included 121 studies. Pooled analysis showed an overall event rate gastrostomy site metastasis of .5% (95% confidence interval [CI], .4%-.7%). Subgroup analysis showed an event rate of .56% (95% CI, .40%-.79%) with the pull technique and .29% (95% CI, .15%-.55%) with the push technique. Clinicopathologic characteristics observed with gastrostomy site metastasis were late-stage disease (T3/T4) (57.8%), positive lymph node status (51.2%), and no evidence of systemic disease (M0) (62.8%) at initial presentation. The average time from gastrostomy placement to diagnosis of metastasis was 7.78 ± 4.9 months, average tumor size on detection was 4.65 cm (standard deviation, 2.02), and average length of survival was 7.26 months (standard deviation, 6.23).
CONCLUSIONS
Gastrostomy site metastasis is a rare but serious adverse event that occurs at an overall rate of .5%, particularly in patients with advanced-stage disease, and is observed with a very poor prognosis. These findings emphasize a need for clinical practice guidelines to include a regular assessment of the PEG site and highlight the importance of detection and management of gastrostomy site metastasis by the multidisciplinary care oncology team.
Topics: Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Gastrostomy; Humans; Incidence; Neoplasm Metastasis; Prognosis; Stomach Neoplasms
PubMed: 31926149
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.12.045 -
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Jun 2023Patients with T1 colorectal cancer (CRC) are at high risk for lymph node metastasis and recurrence after local resection (LR) and need surgical resection (SR) for... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
Patients with T1 colorectal cancer (CRC) are at high risk for lymph node metastasis and recurrence after local resection (LR) and need surgical resection (SR) for additional lymph node dissection to improve prognosis. However, the net benefits of SR and LR are still unquantified.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic search for studies in which survival analysis among high-risk T1 CRC patients undergoing LR and SR was performed. Overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and disease-specific survival (DSS) data were extracted. Hazard ratios (HRs) and fitted survival curves for OS, RFS, and DSS were used to estimate the long-term clinical outcomes of patients in the 2 groups.
RESULTS
This meta-analysis included 12 studies. Compared with those in the SR group, patients in the LR group had higher risks of death (HR, 2.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.59-2.65), recurrence (HR, 3.51; 95% CI, 2.51-4.93), and cancer-related mortality (HR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.17-4.54) in the long term. Fitted survival curves for the LR and SR groups revealed the 5-year, 10-year, and 20-year rates for OS (86.3% and 94.5%, 72.9% and 84.4%, and 61.8% and 71.1%), RFS (89.9% and 96.9%, 83.3% and 93.9%, and 29.6% and 90.8%), and DSS (96.7% and 98.3%, 86.9% and 97.1%, and 86.9% and 96.4%). Log-rank tests showed significant differences among all outcomes except 5-year DSS.
CONCLUSIONS
For high-risk T1 CRC patients, the net benefit of DSS appears to be significant when the observation period exceeds 10 years. A long-term net benefit may exist but may not be applicable to all patients, especially high-risk patients with comorbidities. Therefore, LR may be a reasonable alternative for individualized treatment for some high-risk T1 CRC patients.
Topics: Humans; Prognosis; Survival Analysis; Lymph Node Excision; Lymphatic Metastasis; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Colorectal Neoplasms
PubMed: 36863572
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.02.027