-
Open Forum Infectious Diseases Jun 2024is a World Health Organization critical priority fungal pathogen. We conducted a systematic review to describe its epidemiology in Africa. PubMed and Google scholar... (Review)
Review
is a World Health Organization critical priority fungal pathogen. We conducted a systematic review to describe its epidemiology in Africa. PubMed and Google scholar databases were searched between January 2009 and September 2023 for clinical studies on cases and/or isolates from Africa. Reviews were excluded. We included 19 studies, involving at least 2529 cases from 6 African countries with the most, 2372 (93.8%), reported from South Africa. Whole-genome sequencing of 127 isolates identified 100 (78.7%) as clade III. Among 527 isolates, 481 (91.3%) were resistant to fluconazole, 108 (20.5%) to amphotericin B, and 9 (1.7%) to micafungin. Ninety of 211 (42.7%) patients with clinical outcomes died. is associated with high mortality and antifungal resistance, yet this critical pathogen remains underreported in Africa. Collaborative surveillance, fungal diagnostics, antifungals, and sustainable infection control practices are urgently needed for containment.
PubMed: 38887473
DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofad681 -
Journal de Mycologie Medicale May 2023Systemic candidiasis is caused by Candida invading the bloodstream. The efficacy and safety of echinocandins in monotherapy and combination therapy regimes have not been... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Systemic candidiasis is caused by Candida invading the bloodstream. The efficacy and safety of echinocandins in monotherapy and combination therapy regimes have not been adequately compared in immunocompromised patients with Candidiasis, and thus this systematic review aims to do so.
METHODS
A protocol was prepared a priori. PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were searched systematically (from inception of each database to September 2022) to identify randomized controlled trials. Two reviewers performed screening, quality assessment of trials, and extracted data independently. Pairwise meta-analysis was performed using random-effects model to compare echinocandin monotherapy versus other antifungals. The primary outcomes of interest were treatment success and treatment-related adverse events.
RESULTS
547 records (PubMed=310, EMBASE=210 and Cochrane Library=27) were reviewed. Following our screening criteria, six trials involving 177 patients were included. Risk of bias of four included studies had some concerns due to lack of a pre-specified analysis plan. Meta-analysis shows that echinocandin monotherapy does not have significantly higher rates of "treatment success" compared to other classes of antifungals (RR 1.12, 95%CI 0.80-1.56). However, echinocandins appeared to be significantly safer than other forms of antifungal therapy (RR 0.79, 95%CI 0.73-0.86).
CONCLUSION
Our findings have shown that echinocandin monotherapy (micafungin, caspofungin) given intravenously are just as effective as other antifungals (amphotericin B, itraconazole) in the treatment of systemic candidiasis in immunocompromised patients. There appears to be similar benefits when using echinocandins compared to amphotericin B which has also been used as a broad-spectrum antifungal, while avoiding the severe adverse effects that amphotericin B causes, such as nephrotoxicity.
Topics: Humans; Antifungal Agents; Echinocandins; Amphotericin B; Candidiasis; Immunocompromised Host; Lipopeptides
PubMed: 36867970
DOI: 10.1016/j.mycmed.2023.101362 -
Frontiers in Pediatrics 2020This study aimed to identify alterations in pharmacokinetics in children on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), identify knowledge gaps, and inform future...
This study aimed to identify alterations in pharmacokinetics in children on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), identify knowledge gaps, and inform future pharmacology studies. We systematically searched the databases MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Embase from earliest publication until November 2018 using a controlled vocabulary and keywords related to "ECMO" and "pharmacokinetics," "pharmacology," "drug disposition," "dosing," and "pediatrics." Inclusion criteria were as follows: study population aged <18 years, supported on ECMO for any indications, received any medications while on ECMO, and reported pharmacokinetic data. Clearance and/or volume of distribution values were extracted from included studies. Forty-one studies (total patients = 574) evaluating 23 drugs met the inclusion criteria. The most common drugs studied were antimicrobials ( = 13) and anticonvulsants ( = 3). Twenty-eight studies (68%) were conducted in children <1 year of age. Thirty-three studies (80%) were conducted without intra-study comparisons to non-ECMO controls. Increase in volume of distribution attributable to ECMO was demonstrated for nine (56%) drugs: cefotaxime, gentamicin, piperacillin/tazobactam, fluconazole, micafungin, levetiracetam, clonidine, midazolam, and sildenafil (range: 23-345% increase relative to non-ECMO controls), which may suggest the need for higher initial dosing. Decreased volume of distribution was reported for two drugs: acyclovir and ribavirin (50 and 69%, respectively). Decreased clearance was reported for gentamicin, ticarcillin/clavulanate, bumetanide, and ranitidine (range: 26-95% decrease relative to non-ECMO controls). Increased clearance was reported for caspofungin, micafungin, clonidine, midazolam, morphine, and sildenafil (range: 25-455% increase relative to non-ECMO controls). There were substantial pharmacokinetic alterations in 70% of drugs studied in children on ECMO. However, studies evaluating pharmacokinetic changes of many drug classes and those that allow direct comparisons between ECMO and non-ECMO patients are still lacking. Systematic evaluations of pharmacokinetic alterations of drugs on ECMO that incorporate multidrug opportunistic trials, physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling, and other methods are necessary for definitive dose recommendations. : CRD42019114881.
PubMed: 32670992
DOI: 10.3389/fped.2020.00260 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jan 2016Invasive fungal infections are important causes of morbidity and mortality among critically ill patients. Early institution of antifungal therapy is pivotal for... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Invasive fungal infections are important causes of morbidity and mortality among critically ill patients. Early institution of antifungal therapy is pivotal for mortality reduction. Starting a targeted antifungal therapy after culture positivity and fungi identification requires a long time. Therefore, alternative strategies (globally defined as 'untargeted antifungal treatments') for antifungal therapy institution in patients without proven microbiological evidence of fungal infections have been discussed by international guidelines. This review was originally published in 2006 and updated in 2016. This updated review provides additional evidence for the clinician dealing with suspicion of fungal infection in critically ill, non-neutropenic patients, taking into account recent findings in this field.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effects of untargeted treatment with any antifungal drug (either systemic or nonabsorbable) compared to placebo or no antifungal or any other antifungal drug (either systemic or nonabsorbable) in non-neutropenic, critically ill adults and children. We assessed effectiveness in terms of total (all-cause) mortality and incidence of proven invasive fungal infections as primary outcomes.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the following databases to February 2015: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE (OVID), and EMBASE (OVID). We also searched reference lists of identified studies and major reviews, abstracts of conference proceedings, scientific meetings and clinical trials registries. We contacted experts in the field, study authors and pharmaceutical companies as part of the search strategy.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (irrespective of language or publication status) comparing the use of untargeted treatment with any antifungal drug (either systemic or nonabsorbable) to placebo, no antifungal, or another antifungal agent in non-neutropenic critically ill participants.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Three authors independently applied selection criteria, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. We resolved any discrepancies by discussion. We synthesized data using the random-effects model and expressed the results as risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals. We assessed overall evidence quality using the GRADE approach.
MAIN RESULTS
We included 22 studies (total of 2761 participants). Of those 22 studies, 12 were included in the original published review and 10 were newly identified. Eleven trials compared the use of fluconazole to placebo or no antifungal treatment. Three trials compared ketoconazole versus placebo. One trial compared anidulafungin with placebo. One trial compared caspofungin to placebo. Two trials compared micafungin to placebo. One trial compared amphotericin B to placebo. Two trials compared nystatin to placebo and one trial compared the effect of clotrimazole, ketoconazole, nystatin and no treatment. We found two new ongoing studies and four new studies awaiting classification. The RCTs included participants of both genders with wide age range, severity of critical illness and clinical characteristics. Funding sources from pharmaceutical companies were reported in 11 trials and one trial reported funding from a government agency. Most of the studies had an overall unclear risk of bias for key domains of this review (random sequence generation, allocation concealment, incomplete outcome data). Two studies had a high risk of bias for key domains. Regarding the other domains (blinding of participants and personnel, outcome assessment, selective reporting, other bias), most of the studies had a low or unclear risk but four studies had a high risk of bias.There was moderate grade evidence that untargeted antifungal treatment did not significantly reduce or increase total (all-cause) mortality (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.09, P value = 0.36; participants = 2374; studies = 19). With regard to the outcome of proven invasive fungal infection, there was low grade evidence that untargeted antifungal treatment significantly reduced the risk (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.83, P value = 0.0001; participants = 2024; studies = 17). The risk of fungal colonization was significantly reduced (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.97, P value = 0.03; participants = 1030; studies = 12) but the quality of evidence was low. There was no difference in the risk of developing superficial fungal infection (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.29, P value = 0.24; participants = 662; studies = 5; low grade of evidence) or in adverse events requiring cessation of treatment between the untargeted treatment group and the other group (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.27, P value = 0.51; participants = 1691; studies = 11; low quality of evidence). The quality of evidence for the outcome of total (all-cause) mortality was moderate due to limitations in study design. The quality of evidence for the outcome of invasive fungal infection, superficial fungal infection, fungal colonization and adverse events requiring cessation of therapy was low due to limitations in study design, non-optimal total population size, risk of publication bias, and heterogeneity across studies.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
There is moderate quality evidence that the use of untargeted antifungal treatment is not associated with a significant reduction in total (all-cause) mortality among critically ill, non-neutropenic adults and children compared to no antifungal treatment or placebo. The untargeted antifungal treatment may be associated with a reduction of invasive fungal infections but the quality of evidence is low, and both the heterogeneity and risk of publication bias is high.Further high-quality RCTs are needed to improve the strength of the evidence, especially for more recent and less studied drugs (e.g. echinocandins). Future trials should adopt standardized definitions for microbiological outcomes (e.g. invasive fungal infection, colonization) to reduce heterogeneity. Emergence of resistance to antifungal drugs should be considered as outcome in studies investigating the effects of untargeted antifungal treatment to balance risks and benefit.
Topics: Adult; Amphotericin B; Antifungal Agents; Critical Illness; Fluconazole; Humans; Immunocompromised Host; Mycoses; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 26772902
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004920.pub3 -
Mycoses Sep 2020Chronic pulmonary aspergillosis (CPA) is a potentially life-threatening debilitating lung disease necessitating long-term oral antifungal treatment. However, development... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Chronic pulmonary aspergillosis (CPA) is a potentially life-threatening debilitating lung disease necessitating long-term oral antifungal treatment. However, development of antifungal-resistant isolates of Aspergillus and major toxicities requiring discontinuation of treatment limits their use. Intravenous (IV) antifungals are an option in this group of patients. We comprehensively evaluate the response rates to IV antifungals in the management of CPA. We searched Medline and Embase databases to select clinical studies providing information about IV amphotericin B or an echinocandin for the treatment of CPA from inception to May 2020. Reviews, single-case reports and case series reporting <10 patients were excluded. We evaluated 12 eligible studies. A total of 380 patients received amphotericin B (n = 143) or an echinocandin (n = 237) and were included in the meta-analysis. In a pooled analysis, overall response to IV antifungals was 61% ((95% confidence interval (CI): 52%-70%; I = 73.3%; P < .001), to amphotericin B was 58% (95% CI: 36%-80%; I = 86.6%; P < .001) and to echinocandins was 62% (95% CI: 53%-72%; I = 63.6%; P < .001). Amphotericin B courses were usually doses at slightly <1 mg/Kg (deoxycholate) or 3 mg/Kg (liposomal) for 2-3 weeks. Micafungin doses varied from 12.5 to 300 mg (frequently, 150 mg) daily for at least 3 weeks, and sometimes much longer. Liposomal amphotericin B was well tolerated, but led to renal function loss in 25% of patients. Adverse events were observed in 5-35.3% of patients receiving echinocandins, none of which was considered major. Intravenous antifungals have a place in the management of CPA. A head-to-head comparison of amphotericin B and echinocandins is lacking, and future studies should look at evaluating short- and longer-term outcomes of these agents.
Topics: Administration, Intravenous; Antifungal Agents; Chronic Disease; Disease Management; Echinocandins; Humans; Pulmonary Aspergillosis
PubMed: 32542771
DOI: 10.1111/myc.13131 -
Infection and Drug Resistance 2019The aim of this study was to use a network meta-analysis to evaluate the relative efficacy of various agents at preventing invasive fungal infections (IFIs). In this...
The aim of this study was to use a network meta-analysis to evaluate the relative efficacy of various agents at preventing invasive fungal infections (IFIs). In this way, suitable prophylactic regimens may be selected for patients with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials comparing the prophylactic effects of two antifungal agents or an antifungal agent and a placebo administered to patients with HSCT. Relevant studies were found in the PubMed and Cochrane databases. Unpublished studies were collected from the ClinicalTrials.gov registry. Sixteen two-arm studies were identified. Compared with placebo, all six antifungal agents (amphotericin B, fluconazole, itraconazole, micafungin, posaconazole, and voriconazole) presented with greater efficacy at controlling proven IFIs. OR ranged from 0.08 to 0.29. Voriconazole (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA]=71.6%), posaconazole (SUCRA=68.9%), and itraconazole (SUCRA=64.7%) were the three top-ranking drugs for preventing proven IFIs. Itraconazole ranked highest (SUCRA=83.1%) and had the greatest efficacy at preventing invasive candidiasis. Posaconazole and micafungin were the two top-ranking drugs (SUCRA=81.3% and 78.4%, respectively) at preventing invasive aspergillosis. Micafungin and voriconazole were the drugs of choice because they lowered mortality more than the other agents (SUCRA=74.6% and 61.1%, respectively). This study is the first network meta-analysis to explore the prophylactic effects of antifungal agents in patients with HSCT. Voriconazole was the best choice for the prevention of proven IFIs in HSCT patients.
PubMed: 31190920
DOI: 10.2147/IDR.S203579 -
Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy :... Jun 2020Empirical antifungal therapy is recommended in high-risk patients who have persistent febrile neutropenia (FN) despite broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy. Based on... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Echinocandins versus non-echinocandins for empirical antifungal therapy in patients with hematological disease with febrile neutropenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Empirical antifungal therapy is recommended in high-risk patients who have persistent febrile neutropenia (FN) despite broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy. Based on high-quality evidence, most guidelines recommend caspofungin. The aim of this study was to clarify whether echinocandins, including micafungin, are associated with improved clinical outcomes in patients with persistent FN. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of empirical therapy with echinocandins and non-echinocandins for FN in patients with hematological disease. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality within 7 days after completion of therapy. Secondary outcomes included treatment success, and discontinuation of therapy because of adverse events. For subgroup analysis, we compared RCTs of echinocandins with liposomal amphotericin B. Six RCTs (four that evaluated caspofungin and two that evaluated micafungin) were included in the meta-analysis. Mortality and adverse events in echinocandin-treated patients were significantly lower than in those treated with non-echinocandins [risk ratio (RR) 0.70, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.49-0.99; RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.33-0.71, respectively]. There was no significant difference in treatment success (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.87-1.36). Mortality and adverse events in echinocandin-treated patients were significantly lower than in those treated with liposomal amphotericin B (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.46-0.99; RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.37-0.74, respectively). In conclusion, patients with persistent FN treated with echinocandins had decreased risk of death and adverse events. Both caspofungin and micafungin may be recommended as first-line empirical antifungal therapy in these patients. However, the small number of enrolled patients and the lack of RCTs involving pediatric patients should be considered when using micafungin.
Topics: Amphotericin B; Antifungal Agents; Echinocandins; Febrile Neutropenia; Humans; Mycoses; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome; Voriconazole
PubMed: 32171659
DOI: 10.1016/j.jiac.2020.01.015 -
Mycoses Sep 2021Oral itraconazole and voriconazole are currently recommended in the initial management of chronic pulmonary aspergillosis (CPA). However, only a few studies have... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Oral itraconazole and voriconazole are currently recommended in the initial management of chronic pulmonary aspergillosis (CPA). However, only a few studies have compared outcomes with different anti-fungal agents (AFAs) in treating CPA. Herein, we perform a network meta-analysis comparing the efficacy of different AFAs in CPA.
METHODS
We searched the PubMed and EmBase databases to identify studies (either randomised-controlled trials [RCTs] or observational) reporting treatment outcomes with AFAs in patients of CPA. The study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS). We performed a network meta-analysis to compare the relative efficacy of different AFAs in treating CPA. The primary outcome was a favourable response to treatment with AFAs.
RESULTS
We found ten studies (718 patients) investigating different AFAs (oral AFAs [n = 5], intravenous AFAs [n = 5]) in the treatment of CPA. There were four RCTs and six observational studies. The studies using oral agents reported long-term outcomes (>12 weeks), while those with intravenous agents provided only short-term outcomes (<6 weeks). We found one study of posaconazole and none with isavuconazole for treating CPA. Amongst the oral agents, itraconazole was significantly better than supportive care and was ranked as the best oral AFA on network rank analysis. We found all intravenous AFAs to be equally effective. Intravenous echinocandins and voriconazole were ranked best for achieving a favourable treatment response.
CONCLUSION
Oral itraconazole may be preferred over other azoles as the initial therapy for CPA. Amongst the intravenous agents, echinocandins and voriconazole may be preferred over amphotericin B. Randomised-controlled trials comparing different AFAs, especially the newer AFAs, are urgently needed.
Topics: Antifungal Agents; Echinocandins; Humans; Itraconazole; Network Meta-Analysis; Observational Studies as Topic; Pulmonary Aspergillosis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Voriconazole
PubMed: 34031920
DOI: 10.1111/myc.13324 -
Mycopathologia Feb 2019The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of echinocandins in the treatment of Candida prosthetic joint infection (PJI) based on published literature and on...
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of echinocandins in the treatment of Candida prosthetic joint infection (PJI) based on published literature and on patients we examined. A structured literature review of multiple databases was conducted to identify patients who received echinocandins for Candida PJIs. Additionally, we describe here the first cases of PJIs due to C. parapsilosis, successfully treated with prolonged anidulafungin therapy. Out of 17 patients, 12 were female and the mean age at diagnosis was 66.0 years. No risk factors associated with Candida PJIs were found in four patients (23.5%). Infection sites included the knee (n = 10, 62.5%), the hip (n = 6, 35.3%) and the shoulder (n = 1, 5.9%). The most frequently isolated Candida species were C. albicans (n = 7, 41.2%) and C. glabrata (n = 7, 41.2%), followed by C. parapsilosis (n = 2, 11.8%) and C. freyschussii (n = 1, 5.9%). All patients were cured with the combination of systemic antifungal therapy and surgical interventions. Two-stage exchange arthroplasty and resection arthroplasty were performed in five and nine patients, respectively. The most frequently used echinocandins were caspofungin (n = 11, 64.7%), followed by anidulafungin (n = 4, 23.5%) and micafungin (n = 2, 11.8%). The median duration (days) of echinocandin therapy was as follows: caspofungin (25.5, range 8-56), micafungin (14.0, range 4-56) and anidulafungin (58, range 14-90). This study supports the effective role of echinocandins, as well as the potential advantage of surgical intervention in the treatment of Candida PJIs. Furthermore, it provides fundamental data on the safety of long-term echinocandin therapy.
Topics: Aged; Antifungal Agents; Arthroplasty; Candida; Candidiasis; Demography; Echinocandins; Female; Humans; Joints; Male; Middle Aged; Osteoarthritis; Prosthesis-Related Infections; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 30051279
DOI: 10.1007/s11046-018-0286-1 -
Frontiers in Pharmacology 2020Precision dosing for many antifungal drugs is now recommended. Saliva sampling is considered as a non-invasive alternative to plasma sampling for therapeutic drug...
Precision dosing for many antifungal drugs is now recommended. Saliva sampling is considered as a non-invasive alternative to plasma sampling for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). However, there are currently no clinically validated saliva models available. The aim of this study is firstly, to conduct a systematic review to evaluate the evidence supporting saliva-based TDM for azoles, echinocandins, amphotericin B, and flucytosine. The second aim is to develop a saliva population pharmacokinetic (PK) model for eligible drugs, based on the evidence. Databases were searched up to July 2019 on PubMed and Embase, and 14 studies were included in the systematic review for fluconazole, voriconazole, itraconazole, and ketoconazole. No studies were identified for isavuconazole, posaconazole, flucytosine, amphotericin B, caspofungin, micafungin, or anidulafungin. Fluconazole and voriconazole demonstrated a good saliva penetration with an average S/P ratio of 1.21 (± 0.31) for fluconazole and 0.56 (± 0.18) for voriconazole, both with strong correlation (r = 0.89-0.98). Based on the evidence for TDM and available data, population PK analysis was performed on voriconazole using Nonlinear Mixed Effects Modeling (NONMEM 7.4). 137 voriconazole plasma and saliva concentrations from 11 patients (10 adults, 1 child) were obtained from the authors of the included study. Voriconazole pharmacokinetics was best described by one-compartment PK model with first-order absorption, parameterized by clearance of 4.56 L/h (36.9% CV), volume of distribution of 60.7 L, absorption rate constant of 0.858 (fixed), and bioavailability of 0.849. Kinetics of the voriconazole distribution from plasma to saliva was identical to the plasma kinetics, but the extent of distribution was lower, modeled by a scale factor of 0.5 (4% CV). A proportional error model best accounted for the residual variability. The visual and simulation-based model diagnostics confirmed a good predictive performance of the saliva model. The developed saliva model provides a promising framework to facilitate saliva-based precision dosing of voriconazole.
PubMed: 32595511
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2020.00894