-
Journal of Clinical Oncology : Official... Jan 2023To develop recommendations for treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).
PURPOSE
To develop recommendations for treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).
METHODS
ASCO convened an Expert Panel to conduct a systematic review of relevant studies and develop recommendations for clinical practice.
RESULTS
Five systematic reviews and 10 randomized controlled trials met the systematic review inclusion criteria.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Doublet chemotherapy should be offered, or triplet therapy may be offered to patients with previously untreated, initially unresectable mCRC, on the basis of included studies of chemotherapy in combination with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibodies. In the first-line setting, pembrolizumab is recommended for patients with mCRC and microsatellite instability-high or deficient mismatch repair tumors; chemotherapy and anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy is recommended for microsatellite stable or proficient mismatch repair left-sided treatment-naive wild-type mCRC; chemotherapy and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy is recommended for microsatellite stable or proficient mismatch repair wild-type right-sided mCRC. Encorafenib plus cetuximab is recommended for patients with previously treated V600E-mutant mCRC that has progressed after at least one previous line of therapy. Cytoreductive surgery plus systemic chemotherapy may be recommended for selected patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases; however, the addition of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy is not recommended. Stereotactic body radiation therapy may be recommended following systemic therapy for patients with oligometastases of the liver who are not considered candidates for resection. Selective internal radiation therapy is not routinely recommended for patients with unilobar or bilobar metastases of the liver. Perioperative chemotherapy or surgery alone should be offered to patients with mCRC who are candidates for potentially curative resection of liver metastases. Multidisciplinary team management and shared decision making are recommended. Qualifying statements with further details related to implementation of guideline recommendations are also included.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/gastrointestinal-cancer-guidelines.
Topics: Humans; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Cetuximab; Colonic Neoplasms; Colorectal Neoplasms; Endothelial Growth Factors; Rectal Neoplasms; Practice Guidelines as Topic
PubMed: 36252154
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.22.01690 -
Annals of Oncology : Official Journal... Aug 2019Cancers with a defective DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) system contain thousands of mutations most frequently located in monomorphic microsatellites and are thereby defined...
ESMO recommendations on microsatellite instability testing for immunotherapy in cancer, and its relationship with PD-1/PD-L1 expression and tumour mutational burden: a systematic review-based approach.
BACKGROUND
Cancers with a defective DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) system contain thousands of mutations most frequently located in monomorphic microsatellites and are thereby defined as having microsatellite instability (MSI). Therefore, MSI is a marker of dMMR. MSI/dMMR can be identified using immunohistochemistry to detect loss of MMR proteins and/or molecular tests to show microsatellite alterations. Together with tumour mutational burden (TMB) and PD-1/PD-L1 expression, it plays a role as a predictive biomarker for immunotherapy.
METHODS
To define best practices to implement the detection of dMMR tumours in clinical practice, the ESMO Translational Research and Precision Medicine Working Group launched a collaborative project, based on a systematic review-approach, to generate consensus recommendations on the: (i) definitions related to the concept of MSI/dMMR; (ii) methods of MSI/dMMR testing and (iii) relationships between MSI, TMB and PD-1/PD-L1 expression.
RESULTS
The MSI-related definitions, for which a consensus frame-work was used to establish definitions, included: 'microsatellites', 'MSI', 'DNA mismatch repair' and 'features of MSI tumour'. This consensus also provides recommendations on MSI testing; immunohistochemistry for the mismatch repair proteins MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2 represents the first action to assess MSI/dMMR (consensus with strong agreement); the second method of MSI/dMMR testing is represented by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based assessment of microsatellite alterations using five microsatellite markers including at least BAT-25 and BAT-26 (strong agreement). Next-generation sequencing, coupling MSI and TMB analysis, may represent a decisive tool for selecting patients for immunotherapy, for common or rare cancers not belonging to the spectrum of Lynch syndrome (very strong agreement). The relationships between MSI, TMB and PD-1/PD-L1 expression are complex, and differ according to tumour types.
CONCLUSIONS
This ESMO initiative is a response to the urgent questions raised by the growing success of immunotherapy and provides also important insights on the relationships between MSI, TMB and PD-1/PD-L1.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological; B7-H1 Antigen; Biomarkers, Tumor; DNA Mismatch Repair; DNA Mutational Analysis; European Union; Genetic Testing; High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing; Humans; Immunohistochemistry; Medical Oncology; Microsatellite Instability; Mutation; Neoplasms; Patient Selection; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor; Societies, Medical
PubMed: 31056702
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz116 -
JAMA Oncology Oct 2022Approval by the US Food and Drug Administration of immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) for advanced gastroesophageal cancer (aGEC) irrespective of PD-L1 status has... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Association of PD-L1 Expression and Other Variables With Benefit From Immune Checkpoint Inhibition in Advanced Gastroesophageal Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 17 Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trials.
IMPORTANCE
Approval by the US Food and Drug Administration of immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) for advanced gastroesophageal cancer (aGEC) irrespective of PD-L1 status has generated controversy. Exploratory analyses from individual trials indicate a lack of meaningful benefit from ICI in patients with absent or low PD-L1 expression; however, analysis of a single variable while ignoring others may not consider the instability inherent in exploratory analyses.
OBJECTIVE
To systematically examine the predictive value of tissue-based PD-L1 status compared with that of other variables for ICI benefit in aGEC to assess its stability.
DATA SOURCES
MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register (2000-2022).
STUDY SELECTION, DATA EXTRACTION, AND SYNTHESIS
Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were included of adults with aGEC (adenocarcinoma [AC] or squamous cell carcinoma [SCC]) randomized to anti-PD-1 or PD-L1-containing treatment vs standard of care (SOC). Study screening, data abstraction, and bias assessment were completed independently by 2 reviewers. Of 5752 records screened, 26 were assessed for eligibility; 17 trials were included in the analysis.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
The prespecified primary end point was overall survival. The mean hazard ratio (HR) for ICI vs SOC was calculated (random-effects model). Predictive values were quantified by calculating the ratio of mean HRs between 2 levels of each variable.
RESULTS
In all, 17 RCTs (9 first line, 8 after first line) at low risk of bias and 14 predictive variables were included, totaling 11 166 participants (5067 with SCC, 6099 with ACC; 77.6% were male and 22.4% were female; 59.5% of patients were younger than 65 years, 40.5% were 65 years or older). Among patients with SCCs, PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) was the strongest predictor of ICI benefit (HR, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.53-0.68] for high TPS; and HR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.75-0.95] for low TPS), yielding a predictive value of 41.0% favoring high TPS (vs ≤16.0% for other variables). Among patients with AC, PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) was the strongest predictor (after microsatellite instability high status) of ICI benefit (HR, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.66-0.81] for high CPS; and HR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.84-1.07] for low CPS), yielding a predictive value of 29.4% favoring CPS-high (vs ≤12.9% for other variables). Head-to-head analyses of trials containing both levels of a variable and/or having similar design generally yielded consistent results.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
Tissue-based PD-L1 expression, more than any variable other than microsatellite instability-high, identified varying degrees of benefit from ICI-containing therapy vs SOC among patients with aGEC in 17 RCTs.
Topics: Adult; Female; Humans; Male; Adenocarcinoma; B7-H1 Antigen; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Esophageal Neoplasms; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Microsatellite Instability; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stomach Neoplasms; United States
PubMed: 36006624
DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.3707 -
Journal of Clinical Oncology : Official... Mar 2022To develop recommendations for adjuvant therapy for patients with resected stage II colon cancer.
PURPOSE
To develop recommendations for adjuvant therapy for patients with resected stage II colon cancer.
METHODS
ASCO convened an Expert Panel to conduct a systematic review of relevant studies and develop recommendations for clinical practice.
RESULTS
Twenty-one observational studies and six randomized controlled trials met the systematic review inclusion criteria.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) is not routinely recommended for patients with stage II colon cancer who are not in a high-risk subgroup. Patients with T4 tumors are at higher risk of recurrence and should be offered ACT, whereas patients with other high-risk factors, including sampling of fewer than 12 lymph nodes in the surgical specimen, perineural or lymphovascular invasion, poorly or undifferentiated tumor grade, intestinal obstruction, tumor perforation, or grade BD3 tumor budding, may be offered ACT. The addition of oxaliplatin to fluoropyrimidine-based ACT is not routinely recommended, but may be offered as a result of shared decision making. Patients with mismatch repair deficiency/microsatellite instability tumors should not be routinely offered ACT; if the combination of mismatch repair deficiency/microsatellite instability and high-risk factors results in a decision to offer ACT, oxaliplatin-containing chemotherapy is recommended. Duration of oxaliplatin-containing chemotherapy is also addressed, with recommendations for 3 or 6 months of treatment with capecitabine and oxaliplatin or fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin, with decision making informed by key evidence of 5-year disease-free survival in each treatment subgroup and the rate of adverse events, including peripheral neuropathy.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/gastrointestinal-cancer-guidelines.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Brain Neoplasms; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Colonic Neoplasms; Colorectal Neoplasms; Fluorouracil; Humans; Leucovorin; Microsatellite Instability; Neoplasm Staging; Neoplastic Syndromes, Hereditary; Oxaliplatin
PubMed: 34936379
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.21.02538 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2023Immunotherapy has been approved for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. The efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy for the treatment of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Immunotherapy has been approved for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. The efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy for the treatment of non-metastatic colorectal cancer remains unclear. We tried to explore clinical effect of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in the treatment of non-metastatic colorectal cancer.
METHODS
We searched the databases (PubMed, Wanfang Embase, Cochrane Library and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases) to obtain suitable articles up to September 2022. The primary outcomes of pathological complete response (pCRs), major pathological response (MPR), objective response rate (ORR), R0-resection and anus preserving rate were collected and evaluated. Secordary outcomes (pCRs and MPR) of subgroup analysis between deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite instability-high group (dMMR/MSI-H) and proficient mismatch repair/microsatellite stable group (pMMR/MSS) and outcomes for rectal cancer were analyzed for the final results.
RESULTS
We included ten articles and 410 cases of non-metastatic colorectal cancer with neoadjuvant immunotherapy. There were 113 (27.5%) cases with the dMMR/MSI-H status and 167 (40.7%) cases with the pMMR/MSS status. pCRs was found in 167/373 (44.6%) patients (ES: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.36 to 0.62, <0.01, chi = 65.3, <0.01, = 86.2%) and MPR was found in 194/304 (63.8%) patients (ES: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.54 to 0.78, <0.01, chi = 42.55, <0.01, = 81.2%) with the random-effects model and huge heterogeneity. In the subgroup analysis, pCRs was higher in the dMMR/MSI-H group than the pMMR/MSS group in the fixed-effects model with minimal heterogeneity (OR: 3.55, 95% CI: 1.74 to 7.27, <0.01, chi = 1.86, =0.6, = 0%). pCRs was found in 58/172 (33.9%) rectal cancer patients (ES: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.26 to 0.40, <0.01, chi = 3.04, =0.55, = 0%) with the fixed-effects model and little heterogeneity.
CONCLUSION
Neoadjuvant immunotherapy could increase pCRs and MPR rate for non-metastatic colorectal cancer. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy could achieve better pCRs rate in dMMR/MSI-H group than in the pMMR/MSS group. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy could be another treatment option for non-metastatic colorectal cancer.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#myprospero, identifier CRD42022350523.
Topics: Humans; Colorectal Neoplasms; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Colonic Neoplasms; Immunotherapy; Rectal Neoplasms; Microsatellite Instability
PubMed: 36776899
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1044353 -
Journal of the National Cancer Institute Apr 2022KRAS and BRAF mutations are well-established predictive and prognostic factors in metastatic colorectal cancer; however, their impact in the adjuvant setting has not yet... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
KRAS and BRAF mutations are well-established predictive and prognostic factors in metastatic colorectal cancer; however, their impact in the adjuvant setting has not yet been established.
METHODS
We performed a meta-analysis of adjuvant phase III trials in patients with stage II and III colon cancer with available data on the impact of KRAS or BRAF mutations on both disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Trials were subgrouped based on whether adjustment for microsatellite instability (MSI) was performed and the subgroup effect was analyzed through a meta-regression. To increase the precision of the estimates, a joint DFS-OS (so-called "multivariate") meta-analysis was performed. All statistical tests were 2-sided.
RESULTS
Nine trials were selected (QUASAR 2, PETACC-8, N0147, CALGB-89803, NSABP-C07, NSABP-C08, PETACC-3, QUASAR, MOSAIC) including a total of 10 893 patients. In the primary meta-analysis, KRAS mutation was associated with poor DFS (pooled hazard ratio [HR] = 1.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.15 to 1.61, P < .001) and OS (pooled HR = 1.27, 95% CI = 1.03 to 1.55, P = .03) and BRAF mutation was also associated with poor DFS (pooled HR = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.00 to 1.78, P = .05) and OS (pooled HR = 1.49, 95% CI = 1.31 to 1.70, P < .001). The effect of the mutations on outcome was enhanced in the MSI-adjusted subgroup for both the KRAS mutation (pooled HR for DFS = 1.43, 95% CI = 1.15 to 1.79, P = .001; and pooled HR for OS = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.03 to 1.71, P = .03) and the BRAF mutation (pooled HR for DFS = 1.59, 95% CI = 1.22 to 2.07, P = .001; and pooled HR for OS = 1.67, 95% CI = 1.37 to 2.04, P < .001). The interaction between BRAF and MSI adjustment was statistically significant for DFS (Pinteraction = .02). This interaction was even more pronounced in the DFS-OS multivariate meta-analysis.
CONCLUSIONS
Both KRAS and BRAF mutations were statistically significantly associated with both DFS and OS, with the mutation effect being enhanced by MSI adjustment. Effective adjuvant treatment for microsatellite-stable BRAF or KRAS-mutated colon cancer represents an unmet clinical need, and exploring the use of recently available BRAF and KRAS inhibitors in this setting would be highly desirable.
Topics: Colonic Neoplasms; Colorectal Neoplasms; Humans; Male; Microsatellite Instability; Mutation; Neoplasm Staging; Prognosis; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras); Testicular Neoplasms
PubMed: 34542636
DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djab190 -
Journal of Clinical Oncology : Official... Sep 2022To update the ASCO Biomarkers to Guide Systemic Therapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC) guideline.
PURPOSE
To update the ASCO Biomarkers to Guide Systemic Therapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC) guideline.
METHODS
An Expert Panel conducted a systematic review to identify randomized clinical trials and prospective-retrospective studies from January 2015 to January 2022.
RESULTS
The search identified 19 studies informing the evidence base.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Candidates for a regimen with a phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor and hormonal therapy should undergo testing for mutations using next-generation sequencing of tumor tissue or circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in plasma to determine eligibility for alpelisib plus fulvestrant. If no mutation is found in ctDNA, testing in tumor tissue, if available, should be used. Patients who are candidates for poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor therapy should undergo testing for germline and pathogenic or likely pathogenic mutations to determine eligibility for a PARP inhibitor. There is insufficient evidence for or against testing for a germline pathogenic variant to determine eligibility for PARP inhibitor therapy in the metastatic setting. Candidates for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy should undergo testing for expression of programmed cell death ligand-1 in the tumor and immune cells to determine eligibility for treatment with pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy. Candidates for an immune checkpoint inhibitor should also undergo testing for deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite instability-high to determine eligibility for dostarlimab-gxly or pembrolizumab, as well as testing for tumor mutational burden. Clinicians may test for fusions to determine eligibility for TRK inhibitors. There are insufficient data to recommend routine testing of tumors for mutations, for homologous recombination deficiency, or for TROP2 expression to guide MBC therapy selection. There are insufficient data to recommend routine use of ctDNA or circulating tumor cells to monitor response to therapy among patients with MBC.Additional information can be found at www.asco.org/breast-cancer-guidelines.
Topics: Adenosine Diphosphate; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Biomarkers, Tumor; Breast Neoplasms; Circulating Tumor DNA; Class I Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases; Female; Fulvestrant; Humans; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Ligands; Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Ribose
PubMed: 35759724
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.22.01063 -
Gynecologic Oncology Mar 2023Investigating for mismatch repair protein deficiency (MMRd), microsatellite instability (MSI), and Lynch syndrome (LS) is widely accepted in endometrial cancer, but... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
Investigating for mismatch repair protein deficiency (MMRd), microsatellite instability (MSI), and Lynch syndrome (LS) is widely accepted in endometrial cancer, but knowledge is limited on its value in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). The primary objective was to evaluate the prevalence of mismatch repair protein deficiency (MMRd), microsatellite instability (MSI)-high, and Lynch syndrome (LS) in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), as well as the diagnostic accuracy of LS screening tests. The secondary objective was to determine the prevalence of MMRd, MSI-high, and LS in synchronous ovarian endometrial cancer and in histological subtypes.
METHODS
We systematically searched the MEDLINE, Epub Ahead of Print, MEDLINE In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Embase databases. We included studies analysing MMR, MSI, and/or LS by sequencing.
RESULTS
A total of 55 studies were included. The prevalence of MMRd, MSI-high, and LS in EOC was 6% (95% confidence interval (CI) 5-8%), 13% (95% CI 12-15%), and 2% (95% CI 1-3%) respectively. Hypermethylation was present in 76% of patients with MLH1 deficiency (95% CI 64-84%). The MMRd prevalence was highest in endometrioid (12%) followed by non-serous non-mucinous (9%) and lowest in serous (1%) histological subtypes. MSI-high prevalence was highest in endometrioid (12%) and non-serous non-mucinous (12%) and lowest in serous (9%) histological subtypes. Synchronous and endometrioid EOC had the highest prevalence of LS pathogenic variants at 7% and 3% respectively, with serous having lowest prevalence (1%). Synchronous ovarian and endometrial cancers had highest rates of MMRd (28%) and MSI-high (28%). Sensitivity was highest for IHC (91.1%) and IHC with MSI (92.8%), while specificity was highest for IHC with methylation (92.3%).
CONCLUSION
MMRd and germline LS testing should be considered for non-serous non-mucinous EOC, particularly for endometrioid.
PRECIS
The rates of mismatch repair deficiency, microsatellite instability high, and mismatch repair germline mutations are highest in endometrioid subtype and non-serous non-mucinous ovarian cancer. The rates are lowest in serous histologic subtype.
Topics: Humans; Female; Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Microsatellite Instability; Ovarian Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Endometrioid; Endometrial Neoplasms; Protein Deficiency; DNA Mismatch Repair; MutL Protein Homolog 1
PubMed: 36682091
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.12.008 -
Anticancer Research Dec 2019About 15-20% of colorectal cancers (CRCs) have deficiency in a mismatch repair (MMR) protein. MMR has a high level of microsatellite instability (MSI-H). We have... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND/AIM
About 15-20% of colorectal cancers (CRCs) have deficiency in a mismatch repair (MMR) protein. MMR has a high level of microsatellite instability (MSI-H). We have conducted this review and meta-analysis to determine the prognostic role of MSI-H status in stage II CRC.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We searched PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and SCOPUS for studies reporting data on overall survival (OS) and disease-free or relapse-free survival (DFS or RFS) for MSI-H compared to microsatellite stable (MSS) CRC.
RESULTS
A total of 39 studies were analysed, including 12,110 patients. MSI-H status was associated with a significantly reduced risk of death (HR=0.64, 95%CI=0.52-0.8, p<0.01) and relapse (HR=0.59, 95%CI=0.45-0.77, p<0.01) in stage II CRC.
CONCLUSION
MSI-H represents an important prognostic determinant in stage II CRC and may be considered when estimating the risk of recurrence in stage II CRC.
Topics: Colorectal Neoplasms; DNA Mismatch Repair; Humans; Microsatellite Instability; Neoplasm Staging; Prognosis; Survival Analysis
PubMed: 31810907
DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.13857 -
La Radiologia Medica Feb 2023This study aimed to systematically summarize the performance of the machine learning-based radiomics models in the prediction of microsatellite instability (MSI) in... (Review)
Review
This study aimed to systematically summarize the performance of the machine learning-based radiomics models in the prediction of microsatellite instability (MSI) in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). It was conducted according to the preferred reporting items for a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA) guideline and was registered at the PROSPERO website with an identifier CRD42022295787. Systematic literature searching was conducted in databases of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library up to November 10, 2022. Research which applied radiomics analysis on preoperative CT/MRI/PET-CT images for predicting the MSI status in CRC patients with no history of anti-tumor therapies was eligible. The radiomics quality score (RQS) and Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) were applied to evaluate the research quality (full score 100%). Twelve studies with 4,320 patients were included. All studies were retrospective, and only four had an external validation cohort. The median incidence of MSI was 19% (range 8-34%). The area under the receiver operator curve of the models ranged from 0.78 to 0.96 (median 0.83) in the external validation cohort. The median sensitivity was 0.76 (range 0.32-1.00), and the median specificity was 0.87 (range 0.69-1.00). The median RQS score was 38% (range 14-50%), and half of the studies showed high risk in patient selection as evaluated by QUADAS-2. In conclusion, while radiomics based on pretreatment imaging modalities had a high performance in the prediction of MSI status in CRC, so far it does not appear to be ready for clinical use due to insufficient methodological quality.
Topics: Humans; Colorectal Neoplasms; Machine Learning; Microsatellite Instability; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 36648615
DOI: 10.1007/s11547-023-01593-x