-
Journal of the American Dental... Jul 2015Conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis on nonsurgical treatment of patients with chronic periodontitis by means of scaling and root planing (SRP) with or without... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis on nonsurgical treatment of patients with chronic periodontitis by means of scaling and root planing (SRP) with or without adjuncts.
METHODS
A panel of experts convened by the American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs conducted a search of PubMed (MEDLINE) and Embase for randomized controlled trials of SRP with or without the use of adjuncts with clinical attachment level (CAL) outcomes in trials at least 6 months in duration and published in English through July 2014. The authors assessed individual study bias by using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and conducted meta-analyses to obtain the summary effect estimates and their precision and to assess heterogeneity. The authors used funnel plots and Egger tests to assess publication bias when there were more than 10 studies. The authors used a modified version of the US Preventive Services Task Force methods to assess the overall level of certainty in the evidence.
RESULTS
The panel included 72 articles on the effectiveness of SRP with or without the following: systemic antimicrobials, a systemic host modulator (subantimicrobial-dose doxycycline), locally delivered antimicrobials (chlorhexidine chips, doxycycline hyclate gel, and minocycline microspheres), and a variety of nonsurgical lasers (photodynamic therapy with a diode laser, a diode laser, neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet lasers, and erbium lasers).
CONCLUSIONS AND PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS
With a moderate level of certainty, the panel found approximately a 0.5-millimeter average improvement in CAL with SRP. Combinations of SRP with assorted adjuncts resulted in a range of average CAL improvements between 0.2 and 0.6 mm over SRP alone. The panel judged the following 4 adjunctive therapies as beneficial with a moderate level of certainty: systemic subantimicrobial-dose doxycycline, systemic antimicrobials, chlorhexidine chips, and photodynamic therapy with a diode laser. There was a low level of certainty in the benefits of the other included adjunctive therapies. The panel provides clinical recommendations in the associated clinical practice guideline.
Topics: Chronic Periodontitis; Dental Scaling; Humans; Root Planing; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 26113099
DOI: 10.1016/j.adaj.2015.01.028 -
International Journal of Dermatology Feb 2024Radiesse is a filler composed of calcium hydroxylapatite microspheres suspended in a carboxymethylcellulose gel (CaHA/CMC). It has robust rheological properties that... (Review)
Review
Radiesse is a filler composed of calcium hydroxylapatite microspheres suspended in a carboxymethylcellulose gel (CaHA/CMC). It has robust rheological properties that have been associated with its versatility. CaHA/CMC is employed for both on-label indications of filling wrinkles or lines, volumizing, and contouring of areas as well as off-label indications aiming at biostimulation and skin tightening. However, despite the expanding use of CaHA/CMC, overall evidence and recommendations for treatment are currently lacking. This paper aims to provide an up-to-date overview of CaHA/CMC clinical applications, together with a level of evidence of supporting literature, focusing on the face. Based on the data, CaHA/CMC may be considered a safe and effective treatment option for cheeks, jawline, HIV-related facial lipoatrophy, and nasolabial folds. Treatment of marionette lines, chin, pre-jowl, and corner of the mouth also tends to respond with a high degree of efficacy. Despite the recent trend, guidelines, and safety profile of diluted and hyperdiluted Radiesse , no randomized controlled trials have been published.
Topics: Humans; Biocompatible Materials; Calcium; Carboxymethylcellulose Sodium; Cheek; Cosmetic Techniques; Durapatite; Face; Lipodystrophy; Skin Aging
PubMed: 37897174
DOI: 10.1111/ijd.16888 -
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Jul 2021Genicular artery embolization (GAE) is an innovative technique that has been investigated as a supplementary treatment method for chronic pain secondary to knee... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Genicular artery embolization (GAE) is an innovative technique that has been investigated as a supplementary treatment method for chronic pain secondary to knee osteoarthritis (OA).
PURPOSE
To evaluate the current evidence on the effectiveness and safety of GAE for OA-related knee pain.
STUDY DESIGN
Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS
A systematic literature search was conducted in the PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Scopus databases to identify studies related to knee OA treated with GAE. Treatment agents were categorized as Embozene, imipenem/cilastatin, resorbable microspheres, and polyvinyl alcohol. The main outcomes were the mean difference (MD) in pre- and postembolization pain based on the visual analog scale (VAS) or the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores as well as changes in the need for pain medication. Random- and fixed-effects models were applied for data analysis.
RESULTS
Of 379 initially inspected publications, 11 (N = 225 patients; 268 knees) were included in the final review. The quality of the studies was fair in 8 and poor in 3-categorized according to the National Institutes of Health quality assessment tool. Overall, 119, 72, 13, and 21 patients were treated with imipenem/cilastatin, Embozene, resorbable microspheres, and polyvinyl alcohol, respectively. Symptomatic improvement was reported in all studies. The pooled effect size, characterized by MD, showed a significant improvement in the VAS and WOMAC pain scores, with better functional status after GAE. Pre- versus postembolization MDs in VAS scores ranged from 32 within the first week to 58 after a 2-year follow-up (equivalent to 54% and 80% improvement, respectively). There was a similar trend in the overall WOMAC scores, with MDs ranging from 28.4 to 36.8 (about 58% and 85% improvement, respectively). GAE resulted in a decreased need for pain medication for knee OA, with a 27%, 65%, and 73% decline in the number of patients who used opioids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and intra-articular hyaluronic acid injection, respectively ( < .00001 for all). No significant difference between embolic agents was seen with regard to post-GAE pain reduction. No severe or life-threatening complications were reported.
CONCLUSION
OA treated by GAE using different embolic particles can be considered generally safe, with good efficacy and no reported serious complications.
PubMed: 34350303
DOI: 10.1177/23259671211021356 -
BJU International Mar 2021To systematically review the literature in order to investigate the efficacy and safety of surgical and non-invasive penile enhancement procedures for aesthetic and...
OBJECTIVE
To systematically review the literature in order to investigate the efficacy and safety of surgical and non-invasive penile enhancement procedures for aesthetic and therapeutic purposes.
METHODS
A systematic search for papers investigating penile enhancement procedures was performed using the MEDLINE database. Articles published from January 2010 to December 2019, written in English, including >10 cases, and reporting objective length and/or girth outcomes, were included. Studies without primary data and conference abstracts were excluded. The main outcome measure was objective length and/or girth improvement. The review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement.
RESULTS
Out of 220 unique records, a total of 57 were reviewed. Eighteen studies assessed interventions for penile enhancement in 1764 healthy men complaining of small penis. Thirty-nine studies investigated 2587 men with concomitant pathologies consisting mostly of Peyronie's disease and erectile dysfunction. Twenty-five studies evaluated non-invasive interventions and 32 studies assessed surgical interventions, for a total of 2192 and 2159 men, respectively. Non-invasive interventions, including traction therapies and injection of fillers, were safe and mostly efficacious, whereas surgical interventions were associated with minor complications and mostly increased penile dimensions and/or corrected penile curvature. Overall, the quality of studies was low, and standardized criteria to evaluate and report efficacy and safety of procedures, as well as patient satisfaction, were missing.
CONCLUSION
The quality of the studies on penile enhancement procedures published in the last decade is still low. This prevents us from establishing recommendations based on scientific evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of interventions that are performed to increase the penis size for aesthetic or therapeutic indications.
Topics: Erectile Dysfunction; Humans; Hyaluronic Acid; Male; Microspheres; Organ Size; Patient Satisfaction; Penile Erection; Penile Induration; Penis; Polyesters; Polymethyl Methacrylate; Prostheses and Implants; Traction; Urogenital Surgical Procedures
PubMed: 32575166
DOI: 10.1111/bju.15145 -
European Journal of Gastroenterology &... Feb 2017Radioembolization (RE) is a relatively novel treatment modality for primary and secondary hepatic malignancies. Microspheres embedded with a β-emitting radioisotope are... (Review)
Review
Radioembolization (RE) is a relatively novel treatment modality for primary and secondary hepatic malignancies. Microspheres embedded with a β-emitting radioisotope are injected into the hepatic artery, resulting in microsphere deposition in the tumor arterioles and normal portal triads. Microsphere deposition in nontumorous parenchyma can result in radiation-induced liver injury, with lethal RE-induced liver disease (REILD) at the outer end of the spectrum. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate RE-related hepatotoxicity and present an overview of the currently applied definitions and clinically relevant characteristics of REILD. A systematic literature search on REILD was performed. Studies after the introduction of the term REILD (2008) were screened for definitions of REILD. Hepatotoxicity and applied definitions of REILD were compared. Liver biochemistry test abnormalities occur in up to 100% of patients after RE, mostly self-limiting. The incidence of symptomatic REILD varied between 0 and 31%, although in most reports, the incidence was 0-8%, with a lethal outcome in 0-5%. With the exception of bilirubin, the presentation of hepatotoxicity and REILD was similar for cirrhotic and noncirrhotic patients. No uniform definition of REILD was established in the current literature. Here, we propose a unifying definition and grading system for REILD. RE-related hepatotoxicity is a common phenomenon; symptomatic REILD, however, is rare. Currently, reporting of REILD is highly variable, precluding reliable comparison between studies, identification of risk factors, and treatment developments.
Topics: Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Embolization, Therapeutic; Humans; Liver Diseases; Liver Neoplasms; Microspheres; Radiation Injuries; Radiopharmaceuticals; Radiotherapy; Yttrium Radioisotopes
PubMed: 27926660
DOI: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000772 -
Journal of Clinical Periodontology Jun 2023The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy of patient-performed or administered adjunctive measures to non-surgical peri-implantitis therapy in terms... (Review)
Review
AIM
The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy of patient-performed or administered adjunctive measures to non-surgical peri-implantitis therapy in terms of probing depth (PD) and/or bleeding on probing (BoP) reductions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Randomized and controlled clinical trials with at least 6 months of follow-up were searched in three databases. Secondary outcomes included implant loss, disease resolution, recurrence of peri-implantitis, need of re-treatment, changes in marginal bone levels, patient-reported outcomes and adverse effects.
RESULTS
Of 567 titles, 10 publications, reporting 9 investigations, were included. Three types of adjunctive measures were found (local/systemic antimicrobials and probiotics). Four studies evaluated the effects of local antimicrobials (i.e., minocycline microspheres, chlorhexidine chips or a metronidazole + amoxicillin gel), three studies evaluated systemic antimicrobials (either amoxicillin + metronidazole or metronidazole alone) and two studies evaluated probiotics (Lactobacillus reuteri strains). The addition of local antimicrobials led to modest improvements in PD reduction. Systemic antimicrobials showed significantly greater reductions in PD and BoP, especially at initially deep sites (PD > 6 mm). Due to the large heterogeneity among included studies, no meta-analyses were performed.
CONCLUSIONS
Different adjunctive measures in the non-surgical treatment of peri-implantitis have different impact in terms of PD and BoP reductions. Improved PD reductions result after the use of systemic antimicrobials, and to a lesser extent, after the use of local antimicrobials.
Topics: Humans; Peri-Implantitis; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Metronidazole; Minocycline; Amoxicillin; Anti-Infective Agents; Dental Implants
PubMed: 37143407
DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.13821 -
European Journal of Drug Metabolism and... Jul 2022Almost 15 years after the introduction of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with drug-eluting beads (DEB-TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) therapy, the mean... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review and Pharmacokinetic Meta-analysis of Doxorubicin Exposure in Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization and Doxorubicin-Eluted Beads Chemoembolization for Treatment of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
BACKGROUND
Almost 15 years after the introduction of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with drug-eluting beads (DEB-TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) therapy, the mean peak plasma concentration (C) and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) for doxorubicin have still not been systematically reviewed or meta-analyzed.
OBJECTIVE
To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of available data and establish a reference range for C and AUC of doxorubicin DEB-TACE and TACE, as well as explore the potential influence of microspheres' size and type on these parameters.
METHODS
PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science were searched from August 1992 through December 2021. Studies measuring exposure parameters among HCC patients treated with doxorubicin DEB-TACE without restriction on language were included. Two independent reviewers extracted and unified data sets for pooled estimate analysis. The quality of the evidence was assessed via the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework. The ClinPK Statement checklist and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) were used to determine the quality of studies.
RESULTS
Out of 666 studies, 246 full-text were reviewed, and 8 studies entered the meta-analysis (120 patients). C and AUC of doxorubicin were 7.52-fold (95% CI 7.65 to 7.42-fold; P < 0.0001) and 1.91-fold (95% CI 1.95 to 1.88-fold; P = 0.0001) lower with DEB-TACE compared to TACE. Significant reduction in pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) of C and AUC was observed with DEB-TACE versus TACE in direct comparison analysis (- 2.93; 95% CI - 3.60 to - 2.26, P < 0.00001, and - 1.73 95% CI - 2.55 to - 0.91, P < 0.0001, respectively). Moreover, in DEB-TACE stratification analysis, small microspheres revealed higher C, AUC and tumor response rate as well as lower complication rate.
LIMITATION
The heterogeneity could not be completely addressed through sensitivity and stratification analysis.
CONCLUSION
This meta-analysis provides exposure parameters of doxorubicin and justifies the advantage of DEB-TACE over TACE in terms of safety for patients with unresectable HCC. This study showed a marked association between the size of microsphere and exposure parameters of doxorubicin supporting the preference for small microspheres in DEB-TACE. The moderate and low quality of evidence is assigned to the C and AUC, respectively.
Topics: Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Chemoembolization, Therapeutic; Doxorubicin; Humans; Liver Neoplasms; Microspheres
PubMed: 35543895
DOI: 10.1007/s13318-022-00762-z -
Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied... Dec 2016Use systematic reviews and meta-analyses to assess the effect of polyvinyl alcohol and tris-acryl gelatin microsphere materials in leiomyoma embolization for symptomatic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
Use systematic reviews and meta-analyses to assess the effect of polyvinyl alcohol and tris-acryl gelatin microsphere materials in leiomyoma embolization for symptomatic leiomyomas.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
We included randomised controlled studies published before January 2015 comparing polyvinyl alcohol and tris-acryl gelatin microsphere materials in uterine leiomyoma embolization for women with symptomatic leiomyomas. The main outcome measures included change of overall quality of life, change of overall symptom severity, changes of uterine and leiomyoma volumes, leiomyoma infarction rate, treatment failure and complications.
RESULTS
A total of six randomized controlled studies from 335 studies accounting for 351 women with leiomyomas were identified in this meta-analysis. Compared to polyvinyl alcohol, tris-acryl gelatin microsphere showed a significant benefit in improving the overall quality of life and in reducing uterine volume at three and six months, in reducing overall symptom severity at 6 and 12 months, and furthermore in reducing treatment failure. In addition, tris-acryl gelatin microsphere could significantly reduce leiomyoma volume and decrease <90% complete leiomyoma infarction rate at three months. There were no differences in pain severity, other post-procedural symptoms or medication use in the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS
A better effect of tris-acryl gelatin microsphere in leiomyoma embolization for patients with symptomatic leiomyoma.
Topics: Acrylic Resins; Embolization, Therapeutic; Female; Gelatin; Humans; Leiomyoma; Microspheres; Polyvinyl Alcohol; Quality of Life; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Severity of Illness Index; Tumor Burden; Uterine Neoplasms; Uterus
PubMed: 27433856
DOI: 10.1080/13645706.2016.1207667 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Feb 2016Hepatocellular carcinoma is the most common liver neoplasm and the fifth most common cancer worldwide. Moreover, its incidence has increased dramatically since the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Hepatocellular carcinoma is the most common liver neoplasm and the fifth most common cancer worldwide. Moreover, its incidence has increased dramatically since the mid-2000s. While surgical resection and liver transplantation are the main curative treatments, only around 20% of people with early hepatocellular carcinoma may benefit from these therapies. Current treatment options for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma include various ablative and trans-arterial therapies in addition to the drug sorafenib.
OBJECTIVES
To determine the benefits and harms of yttrium-90 microsphere trans-arterial radioembolisation either as a monotherapy or in combination with other systemic or locoregional therapies versus placebo, no treatment, or other similar systemic or locoregional therapies for people with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.
SEARCH METHODS
We reviewed data from the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Controlled Trials Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Science Citation Index Expanded. We also checked reference lists of primary original studies and review articles manually for further related articles (cross-references) up to December 2015.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Eligible studies included all randomised clinical trials comparing yttrium-90-90 microsphere radioembolisation either as a monotherapy or in combination with other systemic or locoregional therapies versus placebo, no treatment, or other systemic or locoregional therapies for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
The two review authors independently extracted the relevant information on participant characteristics, interventions, study outcomes, and data on the outcomes for this review, as well as information on the design and methodology of the studies. The two review authors assessed risk of bias of the included trials using pre-defined risk of bias domains. We used Trial Sequential Analysis to control the risk of random errors. We assessed the methodological quality with GRADE.
MAIN RESULTS
Two randomised clinical trials with 68 participants fulfilled our inclusion criteria. Both trials were at high risk of bias, and we rated the evidence as very low quality. One of the included trials compared radioembolisation versus chemoembolization for intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma as classified by the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system, while the other included trial was an interim analysis of a randomised trial assessing radioembolisation combined with sorafenib versus sorafenib monotherapy in participants with BCLC-advanced stage hepatocellular carcinoma. The available data were insufficient to perform the planned analyses. Neither of the two trials reported data on all-cause mortality, cancer-related mortality, or time to progression of the tumour. The trial comparing radioembolisation with chemoembolization reported quality of life and serious adverse events, and there were no statistically significant differences between the trial groups with regard to these outcomes at week 12. On the basis of the two included randomised clinical trials, single-session radioembolisation appeared to be as safe as multiple sessions of chemoembolization for intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma and had a similar impact on quality of life, but data were too sparse to exclude even major differences. Radioembolisation followed by sorafenib appeared to be as well tolerated as sorafenib alone for advanced stage hepatocellular carcinoma, but data were too sparse to exclude even major differences. We also identified five ongoing studies evaluating the topic of our review.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
There was insufficient evidence to assess the beneficial and harmful effects of yttrium-90 microsphere radioembolisation for people with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Further randomised clinical trials are mandatory to better assess the potential beneficial and harmful outcomes of yttrium-90 microsphere trans-arterial radioembolisation either as a monotherapy or in combination with other systemic or locoregional therapies versus placebo, no treatment, or other systemic or locoregional therapies for people with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Chemoembolization, Therapeutic; Embolization, Therapeutic; Humans; Liver Neoplasms; Microspheres; Niacinamide; Phenylurea Compounds; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sorafenib; Yttrium Radioisotopes
PubMed: 26905230
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011313.pub2 -
AAPS PharmSciTech May 2022Aqueous colloidal dispersions of water-insoluble polymers (APDs) avoid hassles associated with the use of organic solvents and offer processing advantages related to... (Review)
Review
Aqueous colloidal dispersions of water-insoluble polymers (APDs) avoid hassles associated with the use of organic solvents and offer processing advantages related to their low viscosity and short processing times. Therefore, they became the main vehicle for pharmaceutical coating of tablets and multiparticulates, a process commonly employed using pan and fluidized-bed machinery. Another interesting although less common processing approach is co-spray drying APDs with drugs in aqueous systems. It enables the manufacture of capsule- and matrix-type microspheres with controllable size and improved processing characteristics in a single step. These microspheres can be further formulated into different dosage forms. This systematic review is based on published research articles and aims to highlight the applicability and opportunities of co-spray drying drugs with APDs in drug delivery.
Topics: Drug Compounding; Excipients; Polymers; Solubility; Spray Drying; Tablets; Water
PubMed: 35538248
DOI: 10.1208/s12249-022-02293-x