-
Neurosurgical Review Oct 2021Fusiform intracranial aneurysms (FIA) are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Fusiform intracranial aneurysms (FIA) are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data with propensity score adjustment to compare the functional and angiographic outcomes between surgical and endovascular approaches to FIA. We conducted a systematic review for articles on the treatment of FIA with individual patient-level detailing. Data from patients treated for FIA in our institution from 2010 to 2018 were also collected. The primary studied outcome was morbidity, and secondary outcomes were angiographic results and retreatment. Propensity score-adjusted mixed-effects logistic regression models evaluated treatment options, stratified by anatomical location. Compiling original and published data, there were 312 cases, of which 79 (25.3%) had open surgery, and 233 (74.5%) were treated with endovascular procedures. There were no differences between treatment groups, for neither cavernous ICA (OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.05-23.6) nor supraclinoid aneurysms (OR 7.82, 95% CI 0.65-94.4). Both size (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.03-1.19) and initial mRS (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.2-3.3) were risk factors for morbidity, independent of location. Neither age nor rupture status influenced the odds of posterior morbidity. Unfavorable angiographic outcomes were more common in the endovascular group for supraclinoid and vertebrobasilar aneurysms (χ, P < 0.01). There were no differences between morbidity of surgical and endovascular treatments for FIA, regardless of aneurysm location. Size and initial mRS were correlated with functional outcomes, whereas age and rupture status were not. Microsurgery seems to yield better long-term angiographic results compared to endovascular procedures.
Topics: Embolization, Therapeutic; Endovascular Procedures; Humans; Intracranial Aneurysm; Microsurgery; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 33205313
DOI: 10.1007/s10143-020-01440-x -
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery May 2023Supermicrosurgical simulators and experimental models promote test viability, a faster learning curve, technical innovations, and improvements of the surgical... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Supermicrosurgical simulators and experimental models promote test viability, a faster learning curve, technical innovations, and improvements of the surgical dexterities. The authors aimed to present a systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical experimental models and simulation platforms used for supermicrosurgery.
METHODS
An electronic search was conducted across the PubMed MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus databases in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Data collection included the types of experimental models and outcomes. Pooled estimates were calculated with a random-effect meta-analysis using the DerSimonian-Laird model.
RESULTS
Thirty-eight articles were incorporated in the qualitative synthesis. Twenty-three articles reported the use of in vivo models (60.5%), 12 used ex vivo models (31.5%), and three used synthetic models (7.9%). The superficial inferior epigastric system of rats was the most common in vivo model, whereas chicken wings and hindlimbs were the most common methods used in ex vivo models. The most common methods to evaluate patency of anastomoses were gross inspection, passage of nylon thread into the lumen, and intravascular flow of an injected dye. Nineteen studies were incorporated in the meta-analysis. The overall rate of a successful anastomosis was 94.9% (95% CI, 92.3 to 97.5%). The success rate of in vivo models using rats was 92.5% (95% CI, 88.8 to 96.3%). The success rate of ex vivo models was 97.7% (95% CI, 94.6 to >99%).
CONCLUSION
Simulators that have high fidelity concerning the dissection of the vascular pedicle, flap elevation, supermicrovascular anastomosis, and adequate assessment of a successful anastomosis possess adequate predictive validation to evaluate and simulate the supermicrosurgical technique.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT
Supermicrosurgical simulators are designed to reproduce specific clinical scenarios; therefore, these should be implemented sequentially to develop specific competencies. Supermicrosurgical models must be regarded as mutually inclusive learning platforms to optimize the learning curve.
Topics: Rats; Animals; Microsurgery; Surgical Flaps; Anastomosis, Surgical; Dissection; Models, Theoretical
PubMed: 36729403
DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010084 -
Annals of Plastic Surgery Mar 2020Advances in microsurgery have improved the survival rate of arm replantation. However, the functional outcome of the replanted arms remains unpredictable. The authors...
BACKGROUND
Advances in microsurgery have improved the survival rate of arm replantation. However, the functional outcome of the replanted arms remains unpredictable. The authors performed a systematic review to evaluate the long-term outcome of arm replantation and the secondary reconstructive procedures after replantation.
METHODS
All available English literature in the PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL databases was searched for articles reporting functional outcome of successful arm replantation with follow-up period more than 1 yr. Clinical data were extracted including study characteristics, patient demographic information, functional outcome, and the numbers, types, and timing of secondary surgery. Among these, factors identified to influence overall outcome were reviewed and analyzed.
RESULTS
Twenty-nine studies representing 79 arm replantations met the inclusion criteria. A total of 111 secondary procedures were recorded in 23 studies. The average number of secondary surgical procedures was 2.6 per patient. The most common procedures were nerve repair (23.4%), followed by functioning muscle transfer (19.8%), tendon transfer (17.1%), wound coverage (11.7%), contracture release (10.8%), bone repair (9.9%), arthrodesis (5.4%), and others (1.8%). Procedures involving wound coverage and nerve repair were mainly conducted in the early stage within 4 mos after replantation, whereas functioning muscle transfer, tendon transfer, and arthrodesis were mostly performed after 1 yr postoperatively. The satisfied (Chen I and II) functional outcome was achieved in 49.4% patients. The level of amputation and the type of injury have significant impact on final outcomes, whereas patients' age and timing of nerve repair do not. Patients with amputation at the distal third of the arms had a better outcome than those at the proximal and middle third of the arms (P < 0.05), and patients injured by sharp-cut recovered better than those by crush and avulsion (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
Optimal outcomes could be achieved in nearly half of patients with arm replantation, although multiple secondary surgical interventions and long periods of recovery are often required.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Amputation, Traumatic; Arm; Female; Humans; Male; Microsurgery; Middle Aged; Plastic Surgery Procedures; Replantation; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult
PubMed: 32028338
DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002283 -
Journal of Investigative Surgery : the... Jan 2020: The goal of this meta-analysis and systematic review is to evaluate the overall effect and safety of microsurgery versus laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis
: The goal of this meta-analysis and systematic review is to evaluate the overall effect and safety of microsurgery versus laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of varicocele according to qualified randomized controlled trials (RCTs). : The following electronic databases were searched including PubMed, Cochrane, Embase to identify the qualified studies and publications that were associated with this meta-analysis updated to February 2018 based on index words. The qualified studies only included RCTs. We analyzed the main outcomes through mean difference (MD) and relative risk (RR) along with 95% confidence interval (95% CI). : Totally, the current meta-analysis included 23 studies with 1178 patients in the group with microsurgery and 1069 patients in the group with laparoscopic surgery. The results indicated that compared with the laparoscopic surgery group, the microsurgery group could significantly decrease the complication rate (RR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.21-0.75), as well as the hospital stay (WMD: -0.53, 95% CI: -0.85 to -0.21), increase the sperm concentration after the surgery (WMD: 3.00, 95% CI: 1.23-4.76), and decrease the recurrence rate (RR: 0.35, 95% CI: 0.22-0.55). Besides, there was no significant difference of operation time (SMD: 1.61, 95% CI: 0.71-2.51) and sperm motility (WMD: 2.38, 95% CI: 0.39-4.37) between the two groups. : The results demonstrated microsurgery would significantly decrease the complication, hospital stay, and recurrence rate and increase the sperm concentration when compared with laparoscopic surgery. In conclusion, microsurgery is prone to be a better alternative therapy for the treatment of varicocele than laparoscopic surgery.
Topics: Humans; Infertility, Male; Laparoscopy; Length of Stay; Male; Microsurgery; Operative Time; Postoperative Complications; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recurrence; Sperm Count; Sperm Motility; Treatment Outcome; Urologic Surgical Procedures, Male; Varicocele
PubMed: 30339469
DOI: 10.1080/08941939.2018.1474979 -
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Jun 2018Prevention of blood loss is a chief consideration in plastic and reconstructive surgery. The antifibrinolytic drugs tranexamic acid and ε-aminocaproic acid have emerged... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Prevention of blood loss is a chief consideration in plastic and reconstructive surgery. The antifibrinolytic drugs tranexamic acid and ε-aminocaproic acid have emerged as promising agents to reduce both perioperative blood loss and transfusion requirements. However, published reports in the plastic surgery literature are lacking. The authors sought to summarize the current knowledge of the use of antifibrinolytics in plastic surgery by reviewing the existing literature for clinical outcomes and recommendations.
METHODS
A systematic review of the PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases was conducted for publications examining the use of antifibrinolytics in plastic surgery. Studies were abstracted for procedure type, antifibrinolytic dose, time and mode of administration, blood loss, transfusion requirements, and complications.
RESULTS
Thirty-three studies were deemed eligible for inclusion, comprising a total of 1823 patients undergoing plastic surgical procedures with tranexamic acid (n = 1328) and/or ε-aminocaproic acid (n = 495).
CONCLUSIONS
Tranexamic acid and ε-aminocaproic acid are widely used to reduce blood loss and transfusion requirements in craniofacial and orthognathic surgery, without an increased risk of adverse events. Intravenous administration is most commonly used, although topical formulations show similar efficacy with a reduced systemic distribution. Tranexamic acid has also emerged as a promising agent in aesthetic surgery and burn care, due to its favorable safety profile and role in reducing blood loss, achieving an improved surgical field, and reducing edema and ecchymosis. Further investigation of these agents in the fields of burn care, aesthetic surgery, and microsurgery is warranted to standardize protocols for clinical use.
Topics: Aminocaproic Acid; Antifibrinolytic Agents; Burns; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cohort Studies; Forecasting; Humans; Microsurgery; Orthognathic Surgical Procedures; Plastic Surgery Procedures; Tranexamic Acid
PubMed: 29794717
DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004421 -
Systematic Reviews Dec 2022Vestibular schwannomas are benign tumours for which various treatments are available. We performed a systematic review of prospective controlled trials comparing the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Vestibular schwannomas are benign tumours for which various treatments are available. We performed a systematic review of prospective controlled trials comparing the patient-relevant benefits and harms of single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (sfSRS) with microsurgical resection (MR) in patients with vestibular schwannoma.
METHODS
We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized prospective controlled trials in MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and study registries (last search: 09/2021) and also screened reference lists of relevant systematic reviews. Manufacturers were asked to provide unpublished data. Eligible studies investigated at least one patient-relevant outcome. We assessed the risk of bias (high or low) at the study and outcome level. If feasible, meta-analyses were performed. We graded the results into different categories (hint, indication, or proof of greater benefit or harm).
RESULTS
We identified three non-randomized prospective controlled trials of generally low quality with evaluable data on 339 patients with unilateral vestibular schwannoma. There was an indication of greater benefit of sfSRS compared with MR for facial palsy (OR 0.06, 95% CI 0.02-0.21, p < 0.001, 2 studies), hearing function (no pooled estimate available, 2 studies), and length of hospital stay (no pooled estimate available, 2 studies). We found no clinically relevant differences for mortality, vertigo, headaches, tinnitus, balance function, work disability, adverse events, and health-related quality of life.
CONCLUSIONS
Our systematic review indicates that sfSRS has greater benefits than MR in patients with unilateral vestibular schwannoma. However, it is unclear whether this conclusion still holds after 2 years, as long-term studies are lacking. It is also unclear whether the effects of sfSRS are similar in patients with bilateral vestibular schwannomas. Long-term prospective studies including patients with this condition would therefore be useful.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
The full (German language) protocol and report (Commission No. N20-03) are available on the institute's website: www.iqwig.de/en/projects/n20-03.html.
Topics: Humans; Microsurgery; Neuroma, Acoustic; Radiosurgery; Treatment Outcome; Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic
PubMed: 36503553
DOI: 10.1186/s13643-022-02118-9 -
Journal of Clinical Medicine Jan 2021The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to analyze the efficacy of the computer-aided static navigation technique on the accuracy of root apex location... (Review)
Review
UNLABELLED
The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to analyze the efficacy of the computer-aided static navigation technique on the accuracy of root apex location in endodontic microsurgery.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
A systematic literature review and meta-analysis, based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations, of clinical studies that evaluated the apex location rate of the computer-aided static navigation techniques applied to endodontic microsurgery. A total of four databases were consulted in the literature search: Pubmed-Medline, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science. After eliminating duplicated articles and applying the inclusion criteria, seven articles were selected for the qualitative and the quantitative analysis.
RESULTS
The root apex location success rate stated at 96.8% (confidence interval (CI): 93.0-100%) of the cases performed through a computer-aided static navigation technique. The prediction interval ranges from 91.4% to 100%. The meta-analysis did not detect heterogeneity between the combined studies (Q-test = 6.15; -value = 0.407; I2 = 2.4%). The computer-aided static navigation techniques showed a root apex location success rate 27 times higher than conventional endodontic microsurgery procedures (Q test = 0.80; = 0.671; I2 = 0%). Three studies of computer-aided static navigation techniques and control group were compared using a random effects model with the Mantel-Haenszel method with a statistically significant odds success ratio of 27.7, with a 95% confidence interval between 11.3 and 68.1 (z test = 7.23; < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS
According to in vitro studies analyzed, endodontic microsurgeries performed through computer-aided static navigation techniques show a high precision.
PubMed: 33467707
DOI: 10.3390/jcm10020313 -
Neurosurgical Review Feb 2021To quantitatively synthesize the comparative efficacy and safety of the most common surgical approaches including endonasal transsphenoidal endoscopic surgery (ETES),... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
To quantitatively synthesize the comparative efficacy and safety of the most common surgical approaches including endonasal transsphenoidal endoscopic surgery (ETES), sublabial transsphenoidal microsurgery (STMS) and endonasal transsphenoidal microsurgery (ETMS) for all kinds of pituitary tumors. This systematic review and network meta-analysis was performed on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and comparison studies from databases of Pubmed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane library. We selected the rate of gross complete resection as our primary outcome of efficacy. And the incidence of all complications, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, diabetes insipidus, nasal septal perforation, death, and bleeding were designed as our primary outcomes of safety. Twenty-seven studies with 2618 patients were included in this network meta-analysis. On efficacy, there was no statistical difference among the three methods including ETES, STMS, and ETMS. As for safety, results indicated that the incidence of total complications of STMS (OR = 4.74; 95% CI 1.03, 40.14) is significantly superior to ETES. And the incidence of diabetes insipidus of ETMS (OR = 2.21; 95% CI 1.31, 3.81) was significantly superior to that of ETES. Besides, there was no statistical difference in the other complications including CSF leak, nasal septal perforation, death, and bleeding. We clarified the overpraise of the efficacy of endoscopy especially the endonasal transsphenoidal approach, and verified that all the approaches owned similar efficacy. Moreover, we recommended the endoscopy to be the first choice for pituitary tumors, because it demonstrated the best safety.
Topics: Endoscopy; Humans; Microsurgery; Pituitary Neoplasms
PubMed: 32036504
DOI: 10.1007/s10143-020-01240-3 -
Microsurgery Jul 2017Prolonged mean life expectancy gives rise to a more populated and older patient group. With increasing number of cases during the past decades, older patients are... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Prolonged mean life expectancy gives rise to a more populated and older patient group. With increasing number of cases during the past decades, older patients are regarded as candidates for microsurgical interventions. Whether advanced patient age is an independent risk factor for microsurgical reconstruction is still an ongoing matter of debate.
METHODS
The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL and EMBASE databases were screened for combination of the key words "elderly", "geriatric", "advanced age", "free flap", "microsurgery", free tissue transfer" by using time limits between 1989 and 2015.
RESULTS
According to results of the meta-analysis, there was no significant difference in the flap success rates(P =.39, CI = 0.848 to 2.329) and surgical complication rates (P = .83, CI = 0.792 to 1.163) between the young and elderly patient groups. However, the systemic complication rates(P = .02, CI = 1.468 to 3.572), preoperative ASA scores(P < .0001, CI = 0.342 to 1.078), and mortality rates (P = .03, CI = 2.636 to 9.055) were found to be significantly higher in the elderly patients.
CONCLUSIONS
Although an increased rate of systemic complications and mortality has been associated with advanced age, our study results showed no significant difference between the flap success rates and surgical complications. A successful reduction in systemic complications would bring the risk level of reconstructive microsurgical interventions of the elderly patient group to the level of the young patient group. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microsurgery 37:442-450, 2017.
Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Free Tissue Flaps; Humans; Microsurgery; Models, Statistical; Postoperative Complications; Plastic Surgery Procedures; Risk Factors
PubMed: 28319277
DOI: 10.1002/micr.30156 -
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Aug 2016Although unconventional perfusion flaps have been in clinical use since 1975, many surgeons are still deterred from using them, because of some reports of high necrosis... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Although unconventional perfusion flaps have been in clinical use since 1975, many surgeons are still deterred from using them, because of some reports of high necrosis rates.
METHODS
The authors performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of all articles written in English, French, German, Spanish, and Portuguese on the clinical use of unconventional perfusion flaps and indexed to PubMed from 1975 until July 15, 2015.
RESULTS
A total of 134 studies and 1445 patients were analyzed. The estimated survival rate of unconventional perfusion flaps was 89.5 percent (95 percent CI, 87.3 to 91.3 percent; p < 0.001). Ninety-two percent of unconventional perfusion flaps (95 percent CI, 89.9 to 93.7 percent; p < 0.001) presented complete or nearly complete survival. Most defects mandating unconventional perfusion flap reconstruction were caused by trauma (63.6 percent), especially of the hand and fingers (75.1 percent). The main complication of all types of flaps was a variable degree of necrosis (7.5 percent of all unconventional perfusion flaps presented marginal necrosis; 9.2 percent and 5.5 percent had significant and complete necrosis, respectively). There was a positive correlation between the rate of postoperative infection and the need for a new flap (Pearson coefficient, 0.405; p = 0.001). Flaps used to reconstruct the upper limb showed better survival than those transferred to the head and neck or to the lower limb (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION
Unconventional perfusion flaps show high survival rates and should probably be used more liberally, particularly in the realm of upper limb reconstruction.
CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Therapeutic, V.
Topics: Humans; Microsurgery; Postoperative Complications; Plastic Surgery Procedures; Surgical Flaps
PubMed: 27465169
DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002390