-
Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral... Nov 2015The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the influence of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) on the regeneration of periodontal intrabony defects by... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the influence of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) on the regeneration of periodontal intrabony defects by means of evaluating clinical and radiographic outcomes in prospective human clinical trials.
BACKGROUND
PRP is a high concentration of platelets suspended in a small volume of plasma and has been used for periodontal tissue regeneration. However, although it has been broadly studied, there is much controversy on its efficacy when used to treat infrabony periodontal defects.
METHODS
An electronic literature search was conducted by two reviewers (AR and AM) in several databases up to February 2014. The PICO question was: Does PRP have a higher or similar efficacy of regenerating periodontal intrabony defects compared with other conventional periodontal regeneration treatments (e.g., bone grafts, barrier membranes)? Articles were included in this systematic review if they were prospective clinical trials with 10 or more human patients, reporting the radiographic and/or clinical outcomes PRP for regeneration intrabony periodontal defects. Random effects meta-analyses of the selected studies were applied to avoid any bias being caused by methodologic differences among studies.
RESULTS
Twenty-two papers were obtained and reviewed. Of these, 21 articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria and subsequently were qualitatively analyzed. Eighteen of these could be meta-analyzed. Fourteen articles were included for evaluating of probing pocket depth (PPD). The weighted mean difference (WMD) was 0.55 mm, with a 95% CI=-0.09 to 1.20 mm (P=.09). For bone level (BL), 2 articles measured BL in millimeters, and the other two articles measured BL in percentage. The WMD was 0.76 mm (95% CI=0.21-1.31 mm; P=.007) and 47.41% (95% CI=32.48%-62.33%; P<.0001), respectively. For attachment level (AL) changes, 12 articles were included. The WMD was 0.58 mm, with a 95% CI=0.24 to 0.91 mm (P=.0008). Sixteen articles were included for evaluation of marginal gingival level (MGL). The WMD -0.10 mm, with a 95% CI=-0.19 to -0.01 (P=.03).
CONCLUSIONS
High heterogeneity among studies made it difficult to draw clear conclusions. Nonetheless, within the limitations of this review, PRP might offer some beneficial effects on clinical and radiographic outcomes for regeneration of periodontal intrabony defects.
Topics: Alveolar Bone Loss; Bone Regeneration; Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal; Humans; Periodontal Diseases; Platelet-Rich Plasma; Prospective Studies
PubMed: 26453383
DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2015.06.035 -
Journal of Dentistry Sep 2014The purpose of the present review was to test the null hypothesis of no difference in the implant failure rates, postoperative infection, and marginal bone loss for... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES
The purpose of the present review was to test the null hypothesis of no difference in the implant failure rates, postoperative infection, and marginal bone loss for patients being rehabilitated using dental implants with immediate nonfunctional loading (INFL) compared to immediate functional loading (IFL), against the alternative hypothesis of a difference.
METHODS
An electronic search without time or language restrictions was undertaken in March 2014. Eligibility criteria included clinical human studies, either randomized or not. The estimates of relative effect were expressed in risk ratio (RR) and mean difference (MD) in millimeters.
RESULTS
1059 studies were identified and 11 studies were included, of which 7 were of high risk of bias, whereas four studies were of low risk of bias. The results showed that the procedure used (nonfunctional vs. functional) did not significantly affect the implant failure rates (P=0.70), with a RR of 0.87 (95% CI 0.44-1.75). The wide CI demonstrates uncertainty about the effect size. The analysis of postoperative infection was not possible due to lack of data. No apparent significant effects of non-occlusal loading on the marginal bone loss (MD 0.01mm, 95% CI -0.04-0.06; P=0.74) were observed.
CONCLUSIONS
The results of this study suggest that the differences in occlusal loading between INFL and IFL might not affect the survival of these dental implants and that there is no apparent significant effect on the marginal bone loss.
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE
There has been a controversy concerning whether dental implants should be subjected to immediate functional or nonfunctional loading. As the philosophies of treatment may alter over time, a periodic review of the different concepts is necessary to refine techniques and eliminate unnecessary procedures. This would form a basis for optimum treatment.
Topics: Alveolar Bone Loss; Dental Implants; Dental Restoration Failure; Humans; Immediate Dental Implant Loading; Surgical Wound Infection; Survival Analysis
PubMed: 24995809
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.06.010 -
Heliyon Dec 2023The application of robotic surgery technologies in neurological surgeries resulted in some advantages compared to traditional surgeries, including higher accuracy and... (Review)
Review
The application of robotic surgery technologies in neurological surgeries resulted in some advantages compared to traditional surgeries, including higher accuracy and dexterity enhancement. Its success in various surgical fields, especially in urology, cardiology, and gynecology surgeries was reported in previous studies, and similar advantages in neurological surgeries are expected. Surgeries in the central nervous system with the pathology of millimeters through small working channels around vital tissue need especially high precision. Applying robotic surgery is therefore an interesting dilemma for these situations. This article reviews various studies published on the application of brain and spine robotic surgery and discusses the current application of robotic technology in neurological cases.
PubMed: 38046149
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22523 -
American Journal of Ophthalmology Mar 2024Many studies have examined the ocular pulse amplitude (OPA) to better understand its physiology and clinical relevance, but the papers are scattered, not consistently... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
Many studies have examined the ocular pulse amplitude (OPA) to better understand its physiology and clinical relevance, but the papers are scattered, not consistently indexed, and sometimes difficult to locate. We aimed to identify and summarize the relevant published evidence on OPA and, in a meta-analysis, outline specific differences of this parameter between healthy individual, primary open-angle glaucoma, normal-tension glaucoma, ocular hypertension, and cataract patients.
DESIGN
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
METHODS
A thorough literature search and data extraction were conducted by 2 reviewers independently. Reports on OPA measured by the dynamic contour tonometry in conjunction with different ocular and systemic diseases or potential influencing factors were included.
RESULTS
Of the 527 initially found reports, 97 met the inclusion criteria assessing 31 clinical conditions. A meta-analysis based on 6850 eyes and 106 study arms (68.8%) revealed differences in mean OPA values in millimeters of mercury between various entities. Among healthy eyes, the OPA was 2.58 mm Hg (95% CI: 2.45-2.71), whereas OPA values were higher in glaucoma (unspecified glaucoma 2.73 mm Hg, 95% CI: 2.38-3.08; normal-tension glaucoma 2.66 mm Hg, 95% CI: 2.36-2.97; and primary open-angle glaucoma 2.92 mm Hg, 95% CI: 2.75-3.08). Although ocular hypertension showed the highest OPA values (3.53 mm Hg, 95% CI: 3.05-4.01), the lowest values were found in cataract eyes (2.26 mm Hg, 95% CI: 1.57-2.94).
CONCLUSION
We found different OPA values characteristic of different clinical entities, with above-normal values in glaucoma and ocular hypertension and lower values in cataract patients. Our work is intended for clinicians and researchers who want to get a quick overview of the available evidence or who need statistical data on OPA distributions in individual diseases.
Topics: Humans; Intraocular Pressure; Glaucoma, Open-Angle; Healthy Volunteers; Blood Pressure; Glaucoma; Ocular Hypertension; Tonometry, Ocular; Low Tension Glaucoma; Cataract
PubMed: 37898282
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2023.10.014 -
Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) Jun 2022The aim of this review was to answer the following PICO question: "Do TMJ kinematic parameters (intervention and comparison) show efficacy for assessment of mandibular... (Review)
Review
The aim of this review was to answer the following PICO question: "Do TMJ kinematic parameters (intervention and comparison) show efficacy for assessment of mandibular function (Outcome) both in asymptomatic and TMD subjects? (Population)". PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, Central databases were searched. The inclusion criteria were (1) performed on human, (2) English only, (3) on healthy, symptomatic or surgically altered TMJ, (4) measured dynamic kinematics of mandible or TMJ (5) with six degrees of freedom. To assess the Risk of Bias, the Joanna Briggs Institute tool for non-randomised clinical studies was employed. A pairwise meta-analysis was carried out using STATA v.17.0 (Stata). The heterogeneity was estimated using the Q value and the inconsistency index. Ninety-two articles were included in qualitative synthesis, nine studies in quantitative synthesis. The condylar inclination was significantly increased in female (effect size 0.03°, 95% CI: -0.06, 0.12, = 0.00). Maximum mouth opening (MMO) was increased significantly in female population in comparison with males (effect size 0.65 millimetres (0.36, 1.66). Incisor displacement at MMO showed higher values for control groups compared with TMD subjects (overall effect size 0.16 millimetres (-0.37, 0.69). Evidence is still needed, considering the great variety of devices and parameters used for arthrokinematics. The present study suggests standardising outcomes, design, and population of the future studies in order to obtain more reliable and repeatable values.
PubMed: 35877320
DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering9070269 -
International Journal of Oral and... Jan 2020The aim of this study was to analyse the influence of different loading protocols on marginal bone loss (MBL). The outcomes of different implant loading protocols were... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
The aim of this study was to analyse the influence of different loading protocols on marginal bone loss (MBL). The outcomes of different implant loading protocols were assessed at 1year after implantation, with focus on MBL; protocols included immediate, immediate non-occlusal, early, and conventional loading. The search strategy resulted in 889 studies. Twenty-two of these studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Among the included studies, the lowest MBL was for immediately loaded implants (0.05±0.67mm) and the highest for immediate non-occlusally loaded implants (1.37±0.5mm). The results of the meta-analysis showed an estimated mean MBL of 0.457mm (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.133-0.781) for immediate loading, 0.390mm (95% CI 0.240-0.540) for immediate non-occlusal loading, 0.488mm (95% CI 0.289-0.687) for early loading (>2 days to <3 months), and 0.852mm (95% CI 0.429-1.275) for conventional loading (>3 months) implant protocols. The lowest decrease in 1-year implant survival per millimetre increase in MBL was observed for immediate loading and the highest for conventional loading. Conventional loading showed a significantly higher MBL than the other three loading protocols. This systematic review and meta-analysis indicates that the immediate loading protocol is a reasonable alternative to the conventional loading protocol.
Topics: Alveolar Bone Loss; Dental Implantation, Endosseous; Dental Implants; Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported; Dental Restoration Failure; Immediate Dental Implant Loading; Time Factors
PubMed: 31255443
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2019.03.965 -
Critical Reviews in Oncology/hematology Jan 2016Oral cancer (OC) is known to have a multi-factorial etiology; tobacco, alcohol and betel quid being the major risk factors. Tooth loss and periodontal disease (PD) have... (Review)
Review
UNLABELLED
Oral cancer (OC) is known to have a multi-factorial etiology; tobacco, alcohol and betel quid being the major risk factors. Tooth loss and periodontal disease (PD) have been implicated to increase the risk of developing various cancers. The aim of this systematic review was to assess any possible association between PD and OC. Indexed databases were searched using different combinations of the following key words: "oral cancer", "periodontal disease", "tooth loss", "squamous cell carcinoma", "missing teeth" "alveolar bone loss", "clinical attachment loss" and "periodontitis". PRISMA criteria were followed to accrue data and databases were searched from 1984 up to and including June 2015. In total, 12 case-control studies were selected from the published literature.
RESULTS
Nine studies reported a 2-5 fold increase in the risk of OC among patients with PD as compared to those without PD. Three studies reported no association between PD and OC. In one study, an increased risk of tongue cancer was associated with each millimeter of alveolar bone loss and in two studies clinical attachment loss of more than 1.5mm was associated with an increased risk of OC. In studies reporting significant findings these associations persisted after adjusting for major risk factors. PD is associated with a small but significant increase in risk for OC. In several reported studies this association was attenuated following adjustment for tobacco and alcohol use.
Topics: Humans; Mouth Neoplasms; Periodontal Diseases; Risk Factors
PubMed: 26343577
DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2015.08.018 -
Journal of Clinical Medicine Feb 2020Ultrasound can penetrate deep into tissues and interact with human tissue via thermal and mechanical mechanisms. The ability to focus an ultrasound beam and its energy... (Review)
Review
Ultrasound can penetrate deep into tissues and interact with human tissue via thermal and mechanical mechanisms. The ability to focus an ultrasound beam and its energy onto millimeter-size targets was a significant milestone in the development of therapeutic applications of focused ultrasound. Focused ultrasound can be used as a non-invasive thermal ablation technique for tumor treatment and is being developed as an option to standard oncologic therapies. High-intensity focused ultrasound has now been used for clinical treatment of a variety of solid malignant tumors, including those in the pancreas, liver, kidney, bone, prostate, and breast, as well as uterine fibroids and soft-tissue sarcomas. Magnetic resonance imaging and Ultrasound imaging can be combined with high intensity focused ultrasound to provide real-time imaging during ablation. Magnetic resonance guided focused ultrasound represents a novel non-invasive method of treatment that may play an important role as an alternative to open neurosurgical procedures for treatment of a number of brain disorders. This paper briefly reviews the underlying principles of HIFU and presents current applications, outcomes, and complications after treatment. Recent applications of Focused ultrasound for tumor treatment, drug delivery, vessel occlusion, histotripsy, movement disorders, and vascular, oncologic, and psychiatric applications are reviewed, along with clinical challenges and potential future clinical applications of HIFU.
PubMed: 32046072
DOI: 10.3390/jcm9020460 -
The International Journal of Oral &... Dec 2023Alveolar ridge split (ARS) is ridge augmentation to mitigate ridge width loss that typically follows tooth extraction. This study aimed to determine the efficacy of ARS... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
Alveolar ridge split (ARS) is ridge augmentation to mitigate ridge width loss that typically follows tooth extraction. This study aimed to determine the efficacy of ARS on alveolar ridge horizontal dimensional changes and the survival rates of implants placed into the same sites.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
An electronic and manual search was conducted for English articles published up to January 1, 2021. The PICO (problem, intervention, comparison, outcome) model for quantitative studies was established to address the following two focused questions: (1) What are the effects of the ARS technique on increasing alveolar width and implant survival?; and (2) what are the factors that influence the efficacy of the ARS technique? The outcome measures in this systematic review and meta-analysis were mean alveolar ridge gain-horizontal (buccolingual) in millimeters from baseline (initial presentation) to final assessment (minimum of 12 weeks after ARS), implant survival rate, and patient-reported complication rate. The risk of bias was evaluated using the ROBINS-I assessment tool for non-randomized interventional studies. Weighted means were calculated, and pooled effects and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were depicted on forest plots. Publication bias was assessed by funnel plot and Rosenthal Statistics. A sensitivity analysis was undertaken to assess the primary outcome.
RESULTS
Overall, 35 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review. The mean alveolar ridge gain for ARS was 3.06 mm (95% CI: 3.01 to 3.12 mm). A mean gain of 2.99 mm (95% CI: 2.93 to 3.04 mm) was found after sensitivity analysis, excluding one article with a high risk of bias. There were no significant differences in ridge width in the group with bone graft (mean difference [95% CI] of 2.97 mm [2.91 to 3.03 mm]) and in the group without bone graft (mean difference [95% CI] of 3.06 mm [2.92 to 3.20 mm]). The ARS technique demonstrated a 98.17% implant survival rate in 4,446 implants, 4,103 of which were placed at the time of ARS with a 97.72% implant survival rate, and 343 placed in a delayed approach with a 99.14% implant survival rate. The risk of bias was low in 14.2%, low to moderate in 68.5%, moderate in 11.4%, and severe/moderate in 5.7% of the included studies.
CONCLUSIONS
ARS shows a high implant survival rate in narrow alveolar ridges, adequate horizontal alveolar ridge dimensional gain regardless of adding grafting material, and minimal patient-reported complications.
Topics: Humans; Dental Implantation, Endosseous; Dental Implants; Alveolar Ridge Augmentation; Alveolar Process; Bone Transplantation
PubMed: 38085739
DOI: 10.11607/jomi.9972 -
Journal of Periodontology Mar 2016The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the effects of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) membranes on the outcomes of clinical treatments in patients with gingival... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the effects of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) membranes on the outcomes of clinical treatments in patients with gingival recession.
METHODS
Articles that were published before June 2015 were searched electronically in four databases without any date or language restrictions and searched manually in regular journals and unpublished studies. The eligibility criteria comprised randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective controlled trials with follow-up periods of ≥ 6 months that compared the performance of PRF to other biomaterials in the treatment of Miller Class I or II gingival recessions. For the meta-analysis, the inverse variance method was used in fixed- or random-effect models, which were chosen according to heterogeneity. The estimates of the intervention effects were expressed as the mean differences in percentages or millimeters.
RESULTS
Six RCTs and one prospective clinical trial are included in this review. Root coverage (RC) and clinical attachment level (CAL) did not differ significantly between the analyzed subgroups (P = 0.57 and P = 0.50, respectively). The keratinized mucosa width (KMW) gain was significantly greater (P = 0.04) in the subgroup that was treated with connective tissue grafts.
CONCLUSION
The results of the meta-analysis suggest that the use of PRF membranes did not improve the RC, KMW, or CAL of Miller Class I and II gingival recessions compared with the other treatment modalities.
Topics: Blood Platelets; Connective Tissue; Fibrin; Gingiva; Gingival Recession; Humans; Prospective Studies; Surgical Flaps; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 26561997
DOI: 10.1902/jop.2015.150420