-
The Surgeon : Journal of the Royal... Aug 2015Pancreatitis is the most common and serious complication of diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Prevention strategies... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND AND AIM
Pancreatitis is the most common and serious complication of diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Prevention strategies targeting risk factors could be important to reduce the rate of post-ERCP pancreatitis. However, the risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) are still debated. This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to identify risk factors for PEP.
METHODS
Medline (PubMed and Ovid), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled trials & Database of Systematic Reviews, Embase, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Springer links and WEB OF SCIENCE were searched for published studies in all languages. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were defined a priori. Eighteen probable risk factors were evaluated, and outcomes were expressed in the case of dichotomous variables, as an odds ratio (OR) (with a 95% confidence interval, (CI)).
RESULTS
When patient-related risk factors were analyzed, the ORs for female gender was 1.46 (95%CI: 1.30-1.64); for previous pancreatitis 2.03 (95%CI: 1.31-3.14); for previous PEP was 2.90 (95%CI: 1.87-4.48); for Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD) was 2.04 (95%CI: 1.73-2.33) and for Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) was 3.01 (95%CI: 1.34-6.77). Four endoscopy-related factors were confirmed: the OR for difficult cannulation was 3.49 (95%CI: 1.364-8.925); for endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) it was 1.39 (95%CI: 1.09-1.79); for precut sphincterotomy it was 2.25 (95%CI: 1.70_2.96); and for main pancreatic duct injection it was 1.58 (95%CI: 1.21-2.08).
CONCLUSIONS
Female gender, previous pancreatitis, previous PEP, SOD, IPMN, difficult cannulation, EST, precut sphincterotomy and main pancreatic duct injection are risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis.
Topics: Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde; Humans; Pancreatitis; Risk Factors
PubMed: 25547802
DOI: 10.1016/j.surge.2014.11.005 -
Annals of Surgery Apr 2016To systematically review studies reporting clinicopathological features of intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct (IPNB) to provide evidence-based guidance for... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
To systematically review studies reporting clinicopathological features of intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct (IPNB) to provide evidence-based guidance for management.
BACKGROUND
IPNB is a rare tumor type. Management decisions are currently based upon anecdotal evidence and small case series. To data, there has been no systematic review of IPNB literature.
METHODS
MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched and data were extracted from relevant studies. Meta-analysis was used to pool study estimates. Evidence of association was determined by comparing pooled crude odds ratios (OR) derived from abstracted data.
RESULTS
Fifty-seven retrospective case series were included. At least 43% of 476 specimens contained invasive disease. Invasive tumors were found at significantly higher frequency in pancreaticobiliary than intestinal, gastric or oncocytic-type IPNB [pooled OR 2.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.5-4.2, P < 0.001]. A significantly higher proportion of pancreaticobiliary tumors compared with intestinal tumors expressed MUC-1 [86.4% (95% CI 75.1%-94.7%) vs 13.2% (95% CI 4.6%-25.2%), respectively P < 0.001]. IPNB identified in centers from Asia were more likely to be intrahepatic and were less frequently invasive compared with those from Western centers. Pooled estimates of absolute survival after IPNB resection were 96% (95% CI 93%-99%) at 1 year, 79% (95% CI 69%-88%) at 3 years, and 65% (95% CI 46%-76%) at 5 years.
CONCLUSIONS
Early surgery is advisable for radiologically suspected IPNB as it is frequently invasive. The pathobiology of IPNB demonstrates geographic variation. Pancreaticobiliary IPNB expresses MUC1 and is more frequently associated with invasive disease than other IPNB subtypes.
Topics: Bile Duct Neoplasms; Humans; Neoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and Serous; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 26501712
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001426 -
Discover Oncology Feb 2021Histological subtypes of colorectal cancer may be associated with varied prognostic features. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare... (Review)
Review
Clinicopathological factors and survival outcomes of signet-ring cell and mucinous carcinoma versus adenocarcinoma of the colon and rectum: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
Histological subtypes of colorectal cancer may be associated with varied prognostic features. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare clinicopathological characteristics, recurrence and overall survival between colorectal signet-ring cell (SC) and mucinous carcinoma (MC) to conventional adenocarcinoma (AC).
METHODS
A literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Ovid and Cochrane Library was performed for studies that reported data on clinicopathological and survival outcomes on SC and/or MC versus AC from January 1985 to May 2020. Meta-analysis was performed using random-effect models and between-study heterogeneity was assessed.
RESULTS
Thirty studies of 1,087,055 patients were included: 11,510 (1.06%) with SC, 110,179 (10.13%) with MC and 965,366 (88.81%) with AC. Patients with SC were younger than patients with AC (WMD - 0.47; 95% CI - 0.84 to -0.10; I 88.6%; p = 0.014) and more likely to have right-sided disease (OR 2.12; 95% CI 1.72-2.60; I 82.9%; p < 0.001). Locoregional recurrence at 5 years was more frequent in patients with SC (OR 2.81; 95% CI 1.40-5.65; I 0.0%; p = 0.004) and MC (OR 1.92; 95% CI 1.18-3.15; I 74.0%; p = 0.009). 5-year overall survival was significantly reduced when comparing SC and MC to AC (HR 2.54; 95% CI 1.98-3.27; I 99.1%; p < 0.001 and HR 1.38; 95% CI 1.19-1.61; I 98.6%; p < 0.001, respectively).
CONCLUSION
SC and MC are associated with right-sided lesions, advanced stage at presentation, higher rates of recurrence and poorer overall survival. This has strong implications towards surgical and oncological management and surveillance of colorectal cancer.
PubMed: 35201441
DOI: 10.1007/s12672-021-00398-6 -
The American Surgeon Feb 2018Appendiceal mucoceles (AMs) are rare mucin-containing neoplasms with malignant potential. Lack of evidence-based data exists defining clinicopathological features for... (Review)
Review
Appendiceal mucoceles (AMs) are rare mucin-containing neoplasms with malignant potential. Lack of evidence-based data exists defining clinicopathological features for management. MEDLINE search between 1995 and 2015 was performed using search criteria "Appendix mucocele." Systematic review of patient-, pathologic-, and treatment-related characteristics was performed and data analyzed. Among 276 cases of non-perforated AMs, 163 (59%) patients were female, with variable and nonspecific presentation. Patients were treated with appendectomy (52.1%), right hemicolectomy (17.6%), partial cecectomy (17.2%), and ileocecetomy (13.1%). Pathologic evaluation revealed the following: cystadenoma/low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (54%), unspecified/benign (25%), retention cyst (14.1%), cystadenocarcinoma (4.2%), and mucosal hyperplasia (2.9%). All 11 (4.2%) patients with cystadenocarcinoma were female (P = 0.004), odds ratio for malignancy 1.07 times higher for women. Synchronous colonic malignancy was reported in three patients (27%) with cystadenocarcinoma (P = 0.007), odds ratio of 12.1. AMs have low risk for malignancy. Treatment should begin with appendectomy-only and subsequently guided by pathologic diagnosis.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous; Appendectomy; Appendiceal Neoplasms; Cecum; Colectomy; Cystadenocarcinoma; Cystadenocarcinoma, Mucinous; Cystadenoma, Mucinous; Humans; Ileum; Mucocele
PubMed: 29580358
DOI: No ID Found -
Molecular Nutrition & Food Research Jan 2024Akkermansia muciniphila (A. muciniphila) are Gram negative commensal bacteria, degrading mucin in the intestinal mucosa, modulating intestinal permeability and... (Review)
Review
SCOPE
Akkermansia muciniphila (A. muciniphila) are Gram negative commensal bacteria, degrading mucin in the intestinal mucosa, modulating intestinal permeability and inflammation in the digestive tract, liver, and blood. Some components can promote the relative abundance of A. muciniphila in the gut microbiota, but lower levels of A. muciniphila are more commonly found in people with obesity, diabetes, metabolic syndromes, or inflammatory digestive diseases. Over-intake of ethanol can also induce a decrease of A. muciniphila, associated with dysregulation of microbial metabolite production, impaired intestinal permeability, induction of chronic inflammation, and production of cytokines.
METHODS AND RESULTS
Using a PRISMA search strategy, a review is performed on the bacteriological characteristics of A. muciniphila, the factors capable of modulating its relative abundance in the digestive tract and its probiotic use in alcohol-related liver diseases (alcoholic hepatitis, cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, hepatic transplantation, partial hepatectomy).
CONCLUSION
Several studies have shown that supplementation with A. muciniphila can improve ethanol-related hepatic pathologies, and highlight the interest in using this bacterial species as a probiotic.
Topics: Humans; Verrucomicrobia; Liver Diseases; Inflammation; Ethanol; Akkermansia
PubMed: 38059838
DOI: 10.1002/mnfr.202300510 -
Pancreatology : Official Journal of the... 2016The current management of pancreatic mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCN) is defined by the consensus European, International Association of Pancreatology and American... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
The current management of pancreatic mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCN) is defined by the consensus European, International Association of Pancreatology and American College of Gastroenterology guidelines. However, the criterion for surgical resection remains uncertain and differs between these guidelines. Therefore through this systematic review of the existing literature we aimed to better define the natural history and prognosis of these lesions, in order to clarify recommendations for future management.
METHODS
A systematic literature search was performed (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library) for studies published in the English language between 1970 and 2015.
RESULTS
MCNs occur almost exclusively in women (female:male 20:1) and are mainly located in the pancreatic body or tail (93-95%). They are usually found incidentally at the age of 40-60 years. Cross-sectional imaging and endoscopic ultrasound are the most frequently used diagnostic tools, but often it is impossible to differentiate MCNs from branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (BD-IPMN) or oligocystic serous adenomas pre-operatively. In resected MCNs, 0-34% are malignant, but in those less than 4 cm only 0.03% were associated with invasive adenocarcinoma. No surgically resected benign MCNs were associated with a synchronous lesion or recurrence; therefore further follow-up is not required after resection. Five-year survival after surgical resection of a malignant MCN is approximately 60%.
CONCLUSIONS
Compared to other pancreatic tumors, MCNs have a low aggressive behavior, with exceptionally low rates of malignant transformation when less than 4 cm in size, are asymptomatic and lack worrisome features on pre-operative imaging. This differs significantly from the natural history of small BD-IPMNs, supporting the need to differentiate mucinous cyst subtypes pre-operatively, where possible. The findings support the recommendations from the recent European Consensus Guidelines, for the more conservative management of MCNs.
Topics: Humans; Neoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and Serous; Pancreatic Cyst; Pancreatic Neoplasms
PubMed: 27681503
DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2016.09.011 -
Graefe's Archive For Clinical and... Dec 2023Diquafosol enhances fluid transfer and mucin secretion on ocular surface, which has been suggested as an effective treatment for dry eye disease (DED). The aim of the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Diquafosol enhances fluid transfer and mucin secretion on ocular surface, which has been suggested as an effective treatment for dry eye disease (DED). The aim of the systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy and safety of topical diquafosol versus hyaluronic acid (HA) for DED.
METHODS
Relevant randomized controlled trials were obtained via search of electronic including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. A random-effects model was used to pool the results after incorporating the influence of potential heterogeneity.
RESULTS
A total of nine RCTs involving 1295 patients with DED were included in the meta-analysis. Compared to treatment with 0.1% HA, topical treatment with 3% diquafosol significantly improved the Ocular Surface Disease Index (mean difference (MD): - 3.59, 95% confidence interval (CI): - 4.68 to - 2.50, p < 0.001; I = 6%), results of Schirmer's test (MD: 1.08 mm, 95% CI: 0.41 to 1.76, p = 0.002; I = 0%), tear breakup time (MD: 0.60 s, 95% CI: 0.20 to 0.99, p = 0.003; I = 63%), corneal fluorescein staining score (MD: - 0.20, 95% CI: - 0.37 to - 0.03, p = 0.02; I = 58%), and ocular rose bengal staining score (MD: - 0.62, 95% CI: - 0.88 to - 0.35, p < 0.001; I = 15%). No severe adverse events were reported. Topical use of diquafosol was associated with a higher risk of overall adverse events as compared to HA (odds ratio: 1.71, 95% CI: 1.08 to 2.71, p = 0.02; I = 18%).
CONCLUSIONS
Topical treatment with 3% diquafosol may be more effective than 0.1% HA for patients with DED. However, the long-term efficacy and tolerability of diquafosol still need to be determined.
Topics: Humans; Hyaluronic Acid; Ophthalmic Solutions; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Dry Eye Syndromes; Tears
PubMed: 37162564
DOI: 10.1007/s00417-023-06083-4 -
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Mar 2019The association between hysterectomy for benign gynecologic disease and ovarian cancer risk was controversial. Thus, we perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
The association between hysterectomy for benign gynecologic disease and ovarian cancer risk was controversial. Thus, we perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of hysterectomy and ovarian cancer risk.
METHODS
PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase were searched from 2000 toJanuary 2018. A random-effect model was used to obtain the summary odds risks (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
RESULTS
A total of 18 case-control studies were included in the meta-analysis. We found that there was no statistical significance for ovarian cancer risk following hysterectomy (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.83-1.12). And in subgroup analysis, the protective effects were observed for invasive endometrioid/clear cell carcinomas after hysterectomy (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.51, 0.94; I = 0%), and no statistical significance for serous and mucinous.
CONCLUSIONS
Hysterectomy showed no relationship with ovarian cancer. But a reduced risk was found for endometrioid-invasive OC. These findings could provide evidence for patients with benign gynecological disease and clinicians to make appropriate decision about whether to conduct hysterectomy.
Topics: Case-Control Studies; Female; Humans; Hysterectomy; Ovarian Neoplasms; Risk Factors
PubMed: 30607584
DOI: 10.1007/s00404-018-5020-1 -
Diseases of the Colon and Rectum Dec 2016Mucinous adenocarcinoma represents a potentially poor prognostic subgroup of rectal cancer. A consensus on the effect of mucinous cancer on outcomes following... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Mucinous adenocarcinoma represents a potentially poor prognostic subgroup of rectal cancer. A consensus on the effect of mucinous cancer on outcomes following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and curative resection for rectal cancer has not been reached.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of the current study is to use meta-analytical techniques to assess the association between mucinous histology and response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer.
DATA SOURCES
A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Embase, and The Cochrane Library was performed.
STUDY SELECTION
All studies examining the effect of mucinous histology on chemotherapeutic response in rectal cancer were included.
INTERVENTIONS
No direct interventions were performed.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
Outcomes of mucinous rectal adenocarcinoma were compared with nonmucinous tumors by using random-effects methods to analyze data. Data are presented as ORs with 95% CIs. The main outcomes measured were the rates of pathological complete response, tumor and nodal downstaging, positive resection margin rate, local recurrence, and overall mortality.
RESULTS
Eight comparative series describing outcomes in 1724 patients were identified, 241 had mucinous tumors (14%). Mucinous tumors had a reduced rate of pathological complete response (OR, 0.078; 95% CI, 0.015-0.397; p = 0.002) and tumor downstaging (OR, 0.318; 95% CI, 0.185-0.547; p < 0.001) following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with an increased rate of positive resection margin (OR, 5.018; 95% CI, 3.224-7.810; p < 0.001) and poorer overall survival (OR, 1.526; 95% CI, 1.060-2.198; p = 0.023) following resection. Mucin expression did not significantly affect nodal downstaging (OR, 0.706; 95% CI, 0.295-1.693; p = 0.435) or local recurrence (OR, 1.856; 95% CI, 0.933-3.693; p = 0.078). There was no across-study heterogeneity for any end point.
LIMITATIONS
Most studies were retrospectively designed, and there were variations in patient populations and duration of follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS
Mucinous rectal adenocarcinoma represents a biomarker for poor response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy and is an adverse prognostic indicator.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous; Chemoradiotherapy; Humans; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Prognosis; Rectal Neoplasms; Survival Analysis; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 27824706
DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000635 -
International Journal of Colorectal... Aug 2021For the past two decades, microsatellite instability (MSI) has been reported as a robust clinical biomarker associated with survival advantage attributed to its... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
For the past two decades, microsatellite instability (MSI) has been reported as a robust clinical biomarker associated with survival advantage attributed to its immunogenicity. However, MSI is also associated with high-risk adverse pathological features (poorly differentiated, mucinous, signet cell, higher grade) and exhibits a double-edged sword phenomenon. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the rate of dissemination and the prognosis of early and advanced stage colorectal cancer based on MSI status.
METHODS
A systematic literature search of original studies was performed on Ovid searching MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, American College of Physicians ACP Journal Club, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects DARE, Clinical Trials databases from inception of database to June 2019. Colorectal cancer, microsatellite instability, genomic instability and DNA mismatch repair were used as key words or MeSH terms. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline was followed. Data were pooled using a random-effects model with odds ratio (OR) as the effect size. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan ver 5.3 Cochrane Collaboration.
RESULTS
From 5288 studies, 136 met the inclusion criteria (n = 92,035; MSI-H 11,746 (13%)). Overall, MSI-H was associated with improved OS (OR, 0.81; 95% CI 0.73-0.90), DFS (OR, 0.73; 95% CI 0.66-0.81) and DSS (OR, 0.69; 95% CI 0.52-0.90). Importantly, MSI-H had a protective effect against dissemination with a significantly lower rate of lymph node and distant metastases. By stage, the protective effect of MSI-H in terms of OS and DFS was observed clearly in stage II and stage III. Survival in stage I CRC was excellent irrespective of MSI status. In stage IV CRC, without immunotherapy, MSI-H was not associated with any survival benefit.
CONCLUSIONS
MSI-H CRC was associated with an overall survival benefit with a lower rate of dissemination. Survival benefit was clearly evident in both stage II and III CRC, but MSI-H was neither a robust prognostic marker in stage I nor stage IV CRC without immunotherapy.
Topics: Colorectal Neoplasms; DNA Mismatch Repair; Humans; Immunotherapy; Microsatellite Instability; Microsatellite Repeats; Prognosis
PubMed: 33604737
DOI: 10.1007/s00384-021-03874-1