-
Heart Rhythm Feb 2016Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are implanted with the intention to prolong life in selected patients with inherited arrhythmia syndromes, but ICD... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator harm in young patients with inherited arrhythmia syndromes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of inappropriate shocks and complications.
BACKGROUND
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are implanted with the intention to prolong life in selected patients with inherited arrhythmia syndromes, but ICD implantation is also associated with inappropriate shocks and complications.
OBJECTIVE
We aimed to quantify the rate of inappropriate shocks and other ICD-related complications to be able to weigh benefit and harm in these patients.
METHODS
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of inappropriate shock and/or other ICD-related complication rates, including ICD-related mortality, in patients with inherited arrhythmia syndromes, that is, arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia, Brugada syndrome, catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, dilated cardiomyopathy due to a mutation in the lamin A/C gene, long QT syndrome, and short QT syndrome. We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception to May 30, 2014.
RESULTS
Of 2471 unique citations, 63 studies comprising 4916 patients with inherited arrhythmia syndromes (mean age of 39 ± 15 years) were included. Inappropriate shocks occurred in 20% of patients (crude annual rate of 4.7% per year), with a significantly higher rate in studies published before 2008 (6.1% per year vs 4.1% per year). Moreover, 22% experienced ICD-related complications (4.4% per year) and there was a 0.5% ICD-related mortality (0.08% per year).
CONCLUSION
ICD implantation carries a significant risk of inappropriate shocks and inhospital and postdischarge complications in relatively young patients with inherited arrhythmia syndromes. These data can be used to better inform patients and physicians about the expected risk of adverse ICD events and thereby facilitate shared decision making.
Topics: Adult; Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Death, Sudden, Cardiac; Defibrillators, Implantable; Electric Countershock; Equipment Failure Analysis; Humans; Middle Aged; Risk Assessment
PubMed: 26385533
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.09.010 -
Aging Sep 2023Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common malignant cancers in humans and has a high fatality rate. In recent years, researchers have verified that the...
BACKGROUNDS
Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common malignant cancers in humans and has a high fatality rate. In recent years, researchers have verified that the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway affects the clinicopathological features and prognosis of patients with HCC. Although many studies have investigated the relationship between Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway and HCC, the prognostic value of β-catenin in HCC remains inconclusive. (Catenin Beta-1) is an important factor in the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. However, no consensus has been reached on the clinical and prognostic significance of mutations in HCCs.
METHODS
Eligible studies and relevant data were obtained from PubMed, Web of Science, Elsevier, Cochrane Library, Ovid, and Embase databases. The correlation between mutations and clinical/prognosis of patients were evaluated. A fixed- or random-effects model was used to calculate pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).
RESULTS
Seventeen studies matched the selection criteria, and 1828 patients were included. This meta-analysis demonstrated that patients with HCC with mutations had favorable clinicopathological features and survival. The combined ORs of 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival were0.52 (n = 6 studies, 95% CI: 0.34-0.81, Z = 2.89, =0.004, 0.28 (n =6 studies, 95% CI: 0.18-0.42, Z = 6.03, <0.00001), -0.22 (n = 6 studies, 95% CI: 0.37-0.06, Z = 2.78, = 0.005), respectively. Additionally, mutation might be significantly associated with differentiation (OR = 0.54, 95% CI:0.36-0.81, Z = 2.98, = 0.003), TMN stages (Tumor, Node, Metastasis staging classification) (OR = -0.25, 95% CI:-0.33--0.18, Z = 6.60, <0.00001), liver cirrhosis (OR = 0.21, 95% CI:0.11-0.39, Z = 4.94, < = 0.00001), and HBV (Hepatitis B Virus) infection (OR = 0.44, 95% CI:0.31-0.64, Z = 4.37, <0.0001), but not with tumor size, metastasis, vascular invasion, and HCV infection.
CONCLUSIONS
mutation can serve as an indicator of favorable prognosis as well as a novel target for treatment in HCC.
PubMed: 37733676
DOI: 10.18632/aging.205047 -
World Neurosurgery Jun 2022Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutations are present in 70% of World Health Organization grade II and III gliomas. IDH mutation induces accumulation of the... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutations are present in 70% of World Health Organization grade II and III gliomas. IDH mutation induces accumulation of the oncometabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate. Therefore, therapies targeting reversal of epigenetic dysregulation in gliomas have been suggested. However, the utility of epigenetic treatments in gliomas remains unclear. Here, we present the first clinical systematic review of epigenetic therapies in treatment of IDH-mutant gliomas and highlight their safety and efficacy.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic search of electronic databases from 2000 to January 2021 following PRISMA guidelines. Articles were screened to include clinical usage of epigenetic therapies in case reports, prospective case series, or clinical trials. Primary and secondary outcomes included safety/tolerability of epigenetic therapies and progression-free survival/overall survival, respectively.
RESULTS
A total of 133 patients across 8 clinical studies were included in our analysis. IDH inhibitors appear to have the best safety profile, with an overall grade 3/grade 4 adverse event rate of 9%. Response rates to IDH-mutant inhibitors were highest in nonenhancing gliomas (stable disease achieved in 55% of patients). In contrast, histone deacetylase inhibitors demonstrate a lower safety profile with single-study adverse events as high as 28%.
CONCLUSION
IDH inhibitors appear promising given their benign toxicity profile and ease of monitoring. Histone deacetylase inhibitors appear to have a narrow therapeutic index, as lower concentrations do not appear effective, while increased doses can produce severe immunosuppressive effects. Preliminary data suggest that epigenetic therapies are generally well tolerated and may control disease in certain patient groups, such as those with nonenhancing lesions.
Topics: Brain Neoplasms; Epigenesis, Genetic; Glioma; Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors; Humans; Isocitrate Dehydrogenase; Mutation
PubMed: 35314408
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.03.051 -
Surgical Oncology Jun 2018Hepatic resection is considered the optimal potentially curative treatment for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Following resection, up to two-thirds of patients will... (Review)
Review
Clinical significance and prognostic relevance of KRAS, BRAF, PI3K and TP53 genetic mutation analysis for resectable and unresectable colorectal liver metastases: A systematic review of the current evidence.
BACKGROUND
Hepatic resection is considered the optimal potentially curative treatment for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Following resection, up to two-thirds of patients will develop recurrence within 5-years. Genetic mutation analysis of CRLM, especially KRAS status, has been proposed as a means to guide treatment, as well as identifying patients who can derive the most survival benefit from hepatic resection.
METHODS
A systematic review of the literature was conducted the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane library through February 8th, 2018. The following algorithm was applied: "(colorectal OR rectal OR colon OR colonic) AND (liver OR hepatic) AND (metastasis OR metastases) AND (gene OR mutation OR KRAS OR BRAF OR SMAD4 OR RAS OR TP53 OR P53 OR APC OR PI3K OR MSI OR EGFR OR MACC1 OR microsatellite)."
RESULTS
From the 2404 records retrieved, 78 studies were finally deemed eligible; 47 studies reported mutational data on patients with resectable CRLM, whereas 31 studies reported on patients with unresectable CRLM. Mutational analyses were mostly performed on the CRLM specimen rather than the primary CRC. The vast majority of studies reported on the KRAS mutational status (88.5%, n = 69/78). Prevalence of KRAS mutations ranged from 25% to 52%. Most studies reported that RAS mutation was a negative prognostic factor for overall (OS) (n = 24) and recurrence-free (RFS) (n = 9) survival; a few reports noted no effect of RAS mutational status on OS (n = 4) or RFS (n = 6). Twelve studies reported on BRAF mutations with a prevalence of BRAF mutation ranging from 0 to 9.1% in resected CRLM specimens. BRAF mutation was strongly associated with a worse prognosis. TP53 and PIK3CA gene mutations did not affect long-term outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS
The biological status of each tumor provides the basis for individualized cancer therapeutics. Data on the mutational status on CRLM should be a part of multidisciplinary discussions to help inform the therapeutic approach, type of chemotherapy, as well as timing and approach of surgical resection.
Topics: Biomarkers, Tumor; Colorectal Neoplasms; Hepatectomy; Humans; Liver Neoplasms; Mutation; Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases; Prognosis; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras); Survival Rate; Tumor Suppressor Protein p53
PubMed: 29937183
DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2018.05.012 -
The Journal of Dermatological Treatment May 2018Although BRAF inhibitors have been used to treat advanced melanoma with BRAF mutation, combination strategies are suggested due to acquired resistance to BRAF inhibitors. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Although BRAF inhibitors have been used to treat advanced melanoma with BRAF mutation, combination strategies are suggested due to acquired resistance to BRAF inhibitors.
OBJECTIVE
To assess the efficacy of BRAF inhibitor-based combination therapy for the treatment of advanced melanoma with BRAF mutation.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that compared BRAF inhibitor-based combination therapy with BRAF inhibitor monotherapy. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and relevant conference proceedings. The random-effects inverse variance and Mantel-Haenszel methods were used to pool the results.
RESULTS
Four randomized controlled trials and one cohort study were identified. A combination therapy with BRAF inhibitors and MEK inhibitors was used in all studies. The combined hazard ratios of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) comparing combination therapy with monotherapy were 0.70 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62-0.78] and 0.59 (95% CI 0.55-0.63), respectively. The combined risk ratio of objective response rate (ORR) was 1.30 (95% CI 1.20-1.40), which meant more patients achieved complete/partial responses in combination therapy group than those in the monotherapy group.
CONCLUSIONS
Combination therapy with BRAF inhibitors and MEK inhibitors significantly improved OS, PFS, and ORR in patients with advanced melanoma with BRAF mutation.
Topics: Databases, Factual; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; MAP Kinase Kinase Kinases; Melanoma; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Proto-Oncogene Mas; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Survival Rate
PubMed: 28504036
DOI: 10.1080/09546634.2017.1330530 -
European Journal of Medical Research Jun 2021Coronavirus Disease-2019 (SARS-CoV-2) started its devastating trajectory into a global pandemic in Wuhan, China, in December 2019. Ever since, several variants of...
INTRODUCTION
Coronavirus Disease-2019 (SARS-CoV-2) started its devastating trajectory into a global pandemic in Wuhan, China, in December 2019. Ever since, several variants of SARS-CoV-2 have been identified. In the present review, we aimed to characterize the different variants of SARS-CoV-2 and explore the related morbidity and mortality.
METHODS
A systematic review including the current evidence related to different variants of SARS-CoV-2 and the related morbidity and mortality was conducted through a systematic search utilizing the keywords in the online databases including Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and Science Direct; we retrieved all related papers and reports published in English from December 2019 to September 2020.
RESULTS
A review of identified articles has shown three main genomic variants, including type A, type B, and type C. we also identified three clades including S, V, and G. Studies have demonstrated that the C14408T and A23403G alterations in the Nsp12 and S proteins are the most prominent alterations in the world, leading to life-threatening mutations.The spike D614G amino acid change has become the most common variant since December 2019. From missense mutations found from Gujarat SARS-CoV-2 genomes, C28854T, deleterious mutation in the nucleocapsid (N) gene was significantly associated with patients' mortality. The other significant deleterious variant (G25563T) is found in patients located in Orf3a and has a potential role in viral pathogenesis.
CONCLUSION
Overall, researchers identified several SARS-CoV-2 variants changing clinical manifestations and increasing the transmissibility, morbidity, and mortality of COVID-19. This should be considered in current practice and interventions to combat the pandemic and prevent related morbidity and mortality.
Topics: COVID-19; Coronavirus RNA-Dependent RNA Polymerase; Humans; Morbidity; Mutation; Pandemics; SARS-CoV-2; Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus; Survival Rate; Virulence
PubMed: 34103090
DOI: 10.1186/s40001-021-00524-8 -
European Journal of Surgical Oncology :... Jan 2020To evaluate the benefit of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) by estimating the pathological positive rate of occult lesions, including serous tubal... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the benefit of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) by estimating the pathological positive rate of occult lesions, including serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC) and occult cancers (OCCs).
METHODS
BRCA1/2 mutation carriers who underwent RRSO in a Chinese study center between 2014 and 2018 were included. A literature review was performed, followed by a meta-analysis of the literature to further validate the findings.
RESULTS
Twenty-four BRCA1/2 mutation carriers who underwent RRSO were identified; one patient (4.2%) had STIC, and one patient (4.2%) had occult fallopian tube cancer complicated by STIC. Thirty-four articles were ultimately included in the meta-analysis. Of the reported cases of OCC, 61.3% occurred in the fallopian tubes and 32.3% in the ovaries, and 81.5% were in the early stages. The estimated rate of overall pathological positive events was 5%. The estimated rates of overall STIC events and OCC were 1% and 3%, respectively. The rates of STIC and OCC were 1% and 3%, respectively, for BRCA1 mutation carriers and 1% and 1%, respectively, for BRCA2 mutation carriers. No significant difference was observed between the results of a routine examination of pathological sections and those of the Sectioning and Extensively Examining the Fimbriae (SEE-FIM) protocol.
CONCLUSIONS
This study is the first report of RRSO results in China. In this systematic review, the positive rates of STIC or OCC after RRSO were no more than 3%, which are 200-fold higher than the risk of the general population. The use of a strict SEE-FIM protocol would likely increase positive results.
Topics: Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous; Fallopian Tube Neoplasms; Fallopian Tubes; Female; Genes, BRCA1; Genes, BRCA2; Genetic Predisposition to Disease; Humans; Mutation; Neoplasm Staging; Ovarian Neoplasms; Ovary; Salpingo-oophorectomy
PubMed: 31521389
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.09.002 -
BMC Pulmonary Medicine Jun 2023For patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR mutations, the suggested course of action is epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Efficacy and safety of EGFR-TKIs in combination with angiogenesis inhibitors as first-line therapy for advanced EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
For patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR mutations, the suggested course of action is epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). Even with a high disease control rate, a majority of patients develop acquired EGFR-TKIs resistance and eventually advance. To increase the benefits of treatment, clinical trials are increasingly exploring the value of EGFR-TKIs combined with angiogenesis inhibitors as a first-line treatment in advanced NSCLC carrying EGFR mutations.
METHOD
Using PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library, to locate published full-text articles in print or online, a thorough literature search was done from the database's inception to February 2021. Additionally, oral presentation RCTs from ESMO and ASCO were obtained. We sifted out RCTs that used EGFR-TKIs along with angiogenesis inhibitors as first-line therapy for advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC. ORR, AEs, OS, and PFS were the endpoints. Review Manager version 5.4.1 was used for data analysis.
RESULTS
One thousand eight hundred twenty-one patients were involved in 9 RCTs. According to the results, combining EGFR-TKIs with angiogenesis inhibitors therapy prolonged PFS of advanced EGFR-mutation NSCLC patients on the whole [HR:0.65 (95%CI: 0.59~0.73, P<0.00001)]. No significant statistical difference was identified between the combination group and single drug group in OS(P=0.20) and ORR (P=0.11). There are more adverse effects when EGFR-TKIs are used in combination with angiogenesis inhibitors than when used alone.
CONCLUSION
The combination of EGFR-TKIs and angiogenesis inhibitors prolonged PFS in patients with EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC, but the OS and ORR benefit was not significant, and the risk of adverse events was higher, more pronounced with hypertension and proteinuria; PFS in subgroups suggested that the combination was associated with better PFS in the smoking, liver metastasis, and no brain metastasis groups, and the included studies suggested that the smoking group , liver metastasis group, and brain metastasis group may have a potential OS benefit.
Topics: Humans; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Lung Neoplasms; Liver Neoplasms; ErbB Receptors
PubMed: 37316870
DOI: 10.1186/s12890-023-02472-x -
Journal of Personalized Medicine Dec 2021Recently, checkpoint inhibitors have been investigated in metastatic prostate cancer, however their overall effect is unclear and needs to be further investigated. (Review)
Review
UNLABELLED
Recently, checkpoint inhibitors have been investigated in metastatic prostate cancer, however their overall effect is unclear and needs to be further investigated.
OBJECTIVES
The aim of this systematic review is to investigate the oncological response of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients to immune checkpoint inhibitors.
METHODS
Based on the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement, a systematic review of the literature was conducted through online electronic databases and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Meeting Library. Eligible publications were selected after a staged screening and selection process. RevMan 5.4 software was employed to run the quantitative analysis and forest plots. Risk of bias assessment was conducted using the Cochrane tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for the randomized and non-randomized trials, respectively.
RESULTS
From the 831 results retrieved, 8 studies including 2768 patients were included. There was no significant effect on overall survival (OS) (overall response (OR) = 0.98; Z = 0.42; = 0.67). Meanwhile, progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly better with immune checkpoint inhibitors administration (OR = 0.85; Z = 3.9; < 0.0001). The subgroup analysis for oncological outcomes based on programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) positivity status displayed no significant effect, except on prostate-specific antigen response rate (PSA RR) (OR = 3.25; Z = 2.29; = 0.02). Based on DNA damage repair (DDR), positive patients had a significantly better PFS and a trend towards better OS and overall response rate (ORR); the ORR was 40% in positive patients compared to 20% in the negative patients (OR = 2.46; Z = 1.3; = 0.19), while PSA RR was 23.5% compared to 14.3% (OR = 1.88; Z = 0.88; = 0.38). Better PFS was clearly associated with DDR positivity (OR = 0.70; Z = 2.48; = 0.01) with a trend towards better OS in DDR positive patients (OR = 0.71; Z = 1.38; = 0.17). Based on tumor mutation burden (TMB), ORR was 46.7% with high TMB versus 8.8% in patients with low TMB (OR = 11.88; Z = 3.0; = 0.003).
CONCLUSIONS
Checkpoint inhibitors provide modest oncological advantages in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. There are currently no good predictive indicators that indicate a greater response in some patients.
PubMed: 35055323
DOI: 10.3390/jpm12010008 -
Health Technology Assessment... Oct 2014Bowel cancer is the third most common cancer in the UK. Most bowel cancers are initially treated with surgery, but around 17% spread to the liver. When this happens,... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Bowel cancer is the third most common cancer in the UK. Most bowel cancers are initially treated with surgery, but around 17% spread to the liver. When this happens, sometimes the liver tumour can be treated surgically, or chemotherapy may be used to shrink the tumour to make surgery possible. Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene (KRAS) mutations make some tumours less responsive to treatment with biological therapies such as cetuximab. There are a variety of tests available to detect these mutations. These vary in the specific mutations that they detect, the amount of mutation they detect, the amount of tumour cells needed, the time to give a result, the error rate and cost.
OBJECTIVES
To compare the performance and cost-effectiveness of KRAS mutation tests in differentiating adults with metastatic colorectal cancer whose metastases are confined to the liver and are unresectable and who may benefit from first-line treatment with cetuximab in combination with standard chemotherapy from those who should receive standard chemotherapy alone.
DATA SOURCES
Thirteen databases, including MEDLINE and EMBASE, research registers and conference proceedings were searched to January 2013. Additional data were obtained from an online survey of laboratories participating in the UK National External Quality Assurance Scheme pilot for KRAS mutation testing.
METHODS
A systematic review of the evidence was carried out using standard methods. Randomised controlled trials were assessed for quality using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Diagnostic accuracy studies were assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. There were insufficient data for meta-analysis. For accuracy studies we calculated sensitivity and specificity together with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Survival data were summarised as hazard ratios and tumour response data were summarised as relative risks, with 95% CIs. The health economic analysis considered the long-term costs and quality-adjusted life-years associated with different tests followed by treatment with standard chemotherapy or cetuximab plus standard chemotherapy. The analysis took a 'no comparator' approach, which implies that the cost-effectiveness of each strategy will be presented only compared with the next most cost-effective strategy. The de novo model consisted of a decision tree and Markov model.
RESULTS
The online survey indicated no differences between tests in batch size, turnaround time, number of failed samples or cost. The literature searches identified 7903 references, of which seven publications of five studies were included in the review. Two studies provided data on the accuracy of KRAS mutation testing for predicting response to treatment in patients treated with cetuximab plus standard chemotherapy. Four RCTs provided data on the clinical effectiveness of cetuximab plus standard chemotherapy compared with that of standard chemotherapy in patients with KRAS wild-type tumours. There were no clear differences in the treatment effects reported by different studies, regardless of which KRAS mutation test was used to select patients. In the 'linked evidence' analysis the Therascreen KRAS RGQ PCR Kit (QIAGEN) was more expensive but also more effective than pyrosequencing or direct sequencing, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £17,019 per quality-adjusted life-year gained. In the 'assumption of equal prognostic value' analysis the total costs associated with the various testing strategies were similar.
LIMITATIONS
The results assume that the differences in outcomes between the trials were solely the result of the different mutation tests used to distinguish between patients; this assumption ignores other factors that might explain this variation.
CONCLUSIONS
There was no strong evidence that any one KRAS mutation test was more effective or cost-effective than any other test.
STUDY REGISTRATION
PROSPERO CRD42013003663.
FUNDING
The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.
Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Cetuximab; Colorectal Neoplasms; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Genetic Techniques; Humans; Liver Neoplasms; Markov Chains; Mutation; Proto-Oncogene Proteins; Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras); Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; ras Proteins
PubMed: 25314637
DOI: 10.3310/hta18620