-
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jul 2022Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by systemic inflammation, fibrosis, vascular injury, reduced quality of life, and limited... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by systemic inflammation, fibrosis, vascular injury, reduced quality of life, and limited treatment options. Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has emerged as a potential intervention for severe SSc refractory to conventional treatment.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the benefits and harms of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for the treatment of systemic sclerosis (specifically, non-selective myeloablative HSCT versus cyclophosphamide; selective myeloablative HSCT versus cyclophosphamide; non-selective non-myeloablative HSCT versus cyclophosphamide).
SEARCH METHODS
We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and trial registries from database insertion to 4 February 2022.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included RCTs that compared HSCT to immunomodulators in the treatment of SSc.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently selected studies for inclusion, extracted study data, and performed risk of bias and GRADE assessments to assess the certainty of evidence using standard Cochrane methods.
MAIN RESULTS
We included three RCTs evaluating: non-myeloablative non-selective HSCT (10 participants), non-myeloablative selective HSCT (79 participants), and myeloablative selective HSCT (36 participants). The comparator in all studies was cyclophosphamide (123 participants). The study examining non-myeloablative non-selective HSCT had a high risk of bias given the differences in baseline characteristics between the two arms. The other studies had a high risk of detection bias for participant-reported outcomes. The studies had follow-up periods of one to 4.5 years. Most participants had severe disease, mean age 40 years, and the duration of disease was less than three years. Efficacy No study demonstrated an overall mortality benefit of HSCT when compared to cyclophosphamide. However, non-myeloablative selective HSCT showed overall survival benefits using Kaplan-Meier curves at 10 years and myeloablative selective HSCT at six years. We graded our certainty of evidence as moderate for non-myeloablative selective HSCT and myeloablative selective HSCT. Certainty of evidence was low for non-myeloablative non-selective HSCT. Event-free survival was improved compared to cyclophosphamide with non-myeloablative selective HSCT at 48 months (hazard ratio (HR) 0.34, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.16 to 0.74; moderate-certainty evidence). There was no improvement with myeloablative selective HSCT at 54 months (HR 0.54 95% CI 0.23 to 1.27; moderate-certainty evidence). The non-myeloablative non-selective HSCT trial did not report event-free survival. There was improvement in functional ability measured by the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI, scale from 0 to 3 with 3 being very severe functional impairment) with non-myeloablative selective HSCT after two years with a mean difference (MD) of -0.39 (95% CI -0.72 to -0.06; absolute treatment benefit (ATB) -13%, 95% CI -24% to -2%; relative percent change (RPC) -27%, 95% CI -50% to -4%; low-certainty evidence). Myeloablative selective HSCT demonstrated a risk ratio (RR) for improvement of 3.4 at 54 months (95% CI 1.5 to 7.6; ATB -37%, 95% CI -18% to -57%; RPC -243%, 95% CI -54% to -662%; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) 3, 95% CI 2 to 9; low-certainty evidence). The non-myeloablative non-selective HSCT trial did not report HAQ-DI results. All transplant modalities showed improvement of modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) (scale from 0 to 51 with the higher number being more severe skin thickness) favoring HSCT over cyclophosphamide. At two years, non-myeloablative selective HSCT showed an MD in mRSS of -11.1 (95% CI -14.9 to -7.3; ATB -22%, 95% CI -29% to -14%; RPC -43%, 95% CI -58% to -28%; moderate-certainty evidence). At 54 months, myeloablative selective HSCT at showed a greater improvement in skin scores than the cyclophosphamide group (RR 1.51, 95% CI 1.06 to 2.13; ATB -27%, 95% CI -6% to -47%; RPC -51%, 95% CI -6% to -113%; moderate-certainty evidence). The NNTB was 4 (95% CI 3 to 18). At one year, for non-myeloablative non-selective HSCT the MD was -16.00 (95% CI -26.5 to -5.5; ATB -31%, 95% CI -52% to -11%; RPC -84%, 95% CI -139% to -29%; low-certainty evidence). No studies reported data on pulmonary arterial hypertension. Adverse events In the non-myeloablative selective HSCT study, there were 51/79 serious adverse events with HSCT and 30/77 with cyclophosphamide (RR 1.7, 95% CI 1.2 to 2.3), with an absolute risk increase of 26% (95% CI 10% to 41%), and a relative percent increase of 66% (95% CI 20% to 129%). The number needed to treat for an additional harmful outcome was 4 (95% CI 3 to 11) (moderate-certainty evidence). In the myeloablative selective HSCT study, there were similar rates of serious adverse events between groups (25/34 with HSCT and 19/37 with cyclophosphamide; RR 1.43, 95% CI 0.99 to 2.08; moderate-certainty evidence). The non-myeloablative non-selective HSCT trial did not clearly report serious adverse events.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Non-myeloablative selective and myeloablative selective HSCT had moderate-certainty evidence for improvement in event-free survival, and skin thicknesscompared to cyclophosphamide. There is also low-certainty evidence that these modalities of HSCT improve physical function. However, non-myeloablative selective HSCT and myeloablative selective HSCT resulted in more serious adverse events than cyclophosphamide; highlighting the need for careful risk-benefit considerations for people considering these HSCTs. Evidence for the efficacy and adverse effects of non-myeloablative non-selective HSCT is limited at this time. Due to evidence provided from one study with high risk of bias, we have low-certainty evidence that non-myeloablative non-selective HSCT improves outcomes in skin scores, forced vital capacity, and safety. Two modalities of HSCT appeared to be a promising treatment option for SSc though there is a high risk of early treatment-related mortality and other adverse events. Additional research is needed to determine the effectiveness and adverse effects of non-myeloablative non-selective HSCT in the treatment of SSc. Also, more studies will be needed to determine how HSCT compares to other treatment options such as mycophenolate mofetil, as cyclophosphamide is no longer the first-line treatment for SSc. Finally, there is a need for a greater understanding of the role of HSCT for people with SSc with significant comorbidities or complications from SSc that were excluded from the trial criteria.
Topics: Adult; Cyclophosphamide; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Scleroderma, Systemic
PubMed: 35904231
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011819.pub2 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2023Various immunosuppressive regimens have been developed for the treatment of lupus nephritis (LN). This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
Various immunosuppressive regimens have been developed for the treatment of lupus nephritis (LN). This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of immunosuppressive regimens in adults with LN.
METHODS
We systematically searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases, including conference proceedings, trial registries, and reference lists, from inception until July 10, 2022. The effects of treatment were compared and ranked using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). The primary endpoint was total remission. The secondary endpoints were complete remission, systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index (SLEDAI), relapse, all-cause mortality, end-stage renal disease (ESRD), infection, herpes zoster, ovarian failure, myelosuppression, and cancer.
RESULTS
Sixty-two trials reported in 172 studies involving 6,936 patients were included in the network meta-analysis. The combination of tacrolimus (TAC), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and glucocorticoid (GC) provided the best result for the total remission rate (SUCRA, 86.63%) and SLEDAI (SUCRA, 91.00%), while the combination of voclosporin (VCS) , MMF and GC gave the best improvement in the complete remission rate (SUCRA, 90.71%). The combination of cyclophosphamide (CYC), MMF and GC was associated with the lowest risk of relapse (SUCRA, 85.57%) and cancer (SUCRA, 85.14%), while the combination of obinutuzumab (OTB), MMF and GC was associated with the lowest risk of all-cause mortality (SUCRA, 84.07%). Rituximab (RTX) plus MMF plus GC was associated with the lowest risk of ESRD (SUCRA, 83.11%), while the risk of infection was lowest in patients treated with azathioprine (AZA) plus CYC plus GC (SUCRA, 68.59%). TAC plus GC was associated with the lowest risk of herpes zoster (SUCRA, 87.67%) and ovarian failure (SUCRA, 73.60%). Cyclosporine (CsA) plus GC was associated with the lowest risk of myelosuppression (SUCRA, 79.50%), while AZA plus GC was associated with the highest risk of myelosuppression (SUCRA, 16.25%).
DISCUSSION
This study showed that a combination of TAC, MMF and GC was the best regimen for improving the total remission rate. The optimal regimen for specific outcomes should be highlighted for high-risk patients.
Topics: Humans; Adult; Immunosuppressive Agents; Lupus Nephritis; Network Meta-Analysis; Treatment Outcome; Cyclophosphamide; Tacrolimus; Azathioprine; Mycophenolic Acid; Glucocorticoids; Bone Marrow Diseases; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Recurrence; Herpes Zoster; Neoplasms
PubMed: 37901212
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1232244 -
European Journal of Gastroenterology &... Feb 2018The gold-standard treatment for autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a prednisone/azathioprine combination. However, subgroups of patients may be unresponsive to this... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
The gold-standard treatment for autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a prednisone/azathioprine combination. However, subgroups of patients may be unresponsive to this treatment. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of second-line immunosuppressive therapies for AIH through a systematic review and meta-analysis in adult patients.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
The systematic review was registered at the PROSPERO platform under number 42015019831. Databases MEDLINE (PubMed), Lilacs, Cochrane, and Scielo were searched. The keywords used were 'Hepatitis, Autoimmune' and descriptors terms (MeSH and DeCS). These terms were linked with each immunosuppressant of interest.
RESULTS
A total of 1532 studies were identified. Of these, 1492 were excluded on the basis of title and abstract reading. Among the 40 studies retrieved for detailed full-text analysis, a total of 15 fulfilled the inclusion criteria for the analysis. The most studied second-line immunosuppressive was mycophenolate mofetil (MM). The mean reduction of aminotransferases was observed in 94.3% with tacrolimus/prednisone, 91.3% for cyclosporine/prednisone, 85.5% for budesonide, and 78.7% MM/prednisone. For MM/prednisone, the mean rate of histological remission was 88.6%, liver transplantation was indicated in 11.4%, and the mortality rate was 7.2%. Limitations were also present, such as the lack of randomized-controlled trials and prospective studies, the small number of patients, and the heterogeneity between remission criteria.
CONCLUSION
This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the second-line imunossupressant therapy for AIH. The most studied second-line immunosuppressive is the MM, with a reasonable histological remission. The use of combined tacrolimus/prednisone was the most effective for the normalization of aminotransferases.
Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Cyclophosphamide; Drug Therapy, Combination; Hepatitis, Autoimmune; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Mycophenolic Acid; Prednisone; Retreatment; Tacrolimus
PubMed: 29227329
DOI: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001019 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2022Anti-interferon-γ autoantibody (AIGA) positivity is an emerging immunodeficiency syndrome closely associated with intracellular infection in individuals without human...
BACKGROUND
Anti-interferon-γ autoantibody (AIGA) positivity is an emerging immunodeficiency syndrome closely associated with intracellular infection in individuals without human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). However, the information on epidemiology, pathogen spectrum, and immunotherapy among these patients lack a systematic description of large data.
METHODS
This systematic literature review and multicenter retrospective study aimed to describe the pathogen spectrum and review treatment strategies among patients with AIGA positivity.
RESULTS
We included 810 HIV-negative patients with AIGA positivity infected with one or more intracellular pathogens. Excluding four teenagers, all the patients were adults. The most common pathogen was nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) (676/810, 83.5%). A total of 765 NTM isolates were identified in 676 patients with NTM, including 342 (44.7%) rapid-grower mycobacteria, 273 (35.7%) slow-grower mycobacteria, and 150 (19.6%) unidentified NTM subtype. Even with long-term and intensive antimicrobial treatments, 42.6% of patients with AIGA positivity had recurrence and/or persistent infection. Sixty-seven patients underwent immunoregulatory or immunosuppressive therapy, and most (60) achieved remission. The most common treatment strategy was rituximab (27/67, 40.3%) and cyclophosphamide (22/67, 32.8%), followed by cyclophosphamide combined with glucocorticoids (8/67, 11.9%).
CONCLUSIONS
Intracellular pathogen was the most common infection in patients with AIGA positivity. The predominant infection phenotypes were NTM, varicella-zoster virus, , and spp., with or without other opportunistic infections. AIGA immunotherapy, including rituximab or cyclophosphamide, has yielded good preliminary results in some cases.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Adolescent; Retrospective Studies; Mycobacterium Infections, Nontuberculous; Autoantibodies; Rituximab; Nontuberculous Mycobacteria; Immunotherapy; Cyclophosphamide; HIV Infections; Multicenter Studies as Topic
PubMed: 36569827
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1051673 -
Clinical and Experimental Dental... Feb 2023Granulomatosis with polyangiitis is an unusual multisystemic inflammatory disease, with vasculitis of small- and medium-sized vessels, with a predilection for... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
Granulomatosis with polyangiitis is an unusual multisystemic inflammatory disease, with vasculitis of small- and medium-sized vessels, with a predilection for upper lower airways and kidneys. The etiology remains unknown although it may originate from different stimuli, in genetically susceptible patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A detailed database search was performed. The variables were demographics, localization, histopathological findings, antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody, cytoplasmic (c-ANCA) tests, treatment, and follow-up.
RESULTS
Fifty-two cases were identified; the mean age was 49.6 years, with a range from 6 to 87 years. It was most frequently seen in females (57.7%). The most common race was white (59.6%). The most frequent location was in the maxillary gingiva (28.8%), followed by both the upper and lower gingiva (19.2%). The most common clinical presentation was "strawberry gingivitis" (61.5%). The main symptom was pain, in 50%. Regarding the c-ANCA test, it was positive in 71.2% of cases. The most common therapy was prednisone and cyclophosphamide, utilized in 51.9%. The average follow-up was 23.6 months, and 88.5% of patients were still alive at follow-up.
CONCLUSION
The diagnosis initially was difficult to establish, an early diagnosis and treatment are mandatory. If untreated the disease can be associated with morbidity and mortality. For the oral clinician, this disease needs to be addressed in the differential diagnosis of oral lesions.
Topics: Female; Humans; Child; Adolescent; Young Adult; Adult; Middle Aged; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Cyclophosphamide
PubMed: 36600477
DOI: 10.1002/cre2.706 -
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases Oct 2016The data from cohorts of childhood-onset granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) and microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) remain scarce and heterogeneous. We aimed to analyse... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
The data from cohorts of childhood-onset granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) and microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) remain scarce and heterogeneous. We aimed to analyse the features at presentation, therapeutic approaches and the disease course of these rare diseases.
METHODS
Electronic searches of Medline and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled trials database were conducted. We also checked the reference lists of the studies included and other systematic reviews, to identify additional reports. We included all cohorts, cross-sectional studies or registries reporting features at presentation or outcomes in patients with a diagnosis of childhood-onset GPA or MPA (age <18 years). The pooled prevalence of clinical manifestations at presentation, ANCA and induction therapies for GPA and MPA was calculated.
RESULTS
We reviewed 570 full texts and identified 14 studies on GPA and 8 on MPA. Childhood-onset GPA and MPA occurred predominantly in female subjects during adolescence. For GPA, ear-nose-throat (ENT) disease (pooled prevalence 82 % [95 % CI 78-87]), constitutional symptoms (73 % [95 % CI 55-88]), renal (65 % [95 % CI 49-79]), and lower respiratory tract (61 % [95 % CI 48-74]) manifestations were the most frequently reported at presentation. Renal disease was a hallmark of MPA (94 % [95 % CI 89-97]). ANCA were detected in >90 % of children with GPA or MPA. Combined corticosteroids and cyclophosphamide was the most frequently used first remission-inducing treatment for GPA (76 % [95 % CI 69-82]) and MPA (62 % [95 % CI 20-96]). Relapses occurred more frequently in GPA (67-100 %) than in MPA (25-50 %). The leading causes of death were the disease itself, and infections.
CONCLUSIONS
Childhood-onset MPA and GPA remain severe diseases with frequent relapses and a high cumulative morbidity. Survival and disease-free survival need to be improved.
Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Cross-Sectional Studies; Cyclophosphamide; Disease Progression; Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis; Humans; Microscopic Polyangiitis
PubMed: 27770813
DOI: 10.1186/s13023-016-0523-y -
Pituitary Oct 2017Granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) is a multisystem disease, characterized by necrotizing small-vessel vasculitis, which mainly affects the respiratory tract and the... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) is a multisystem disease, characterized by necrotizing small-vessel vasculitis, which mainly affects the respiratory tract and the kidneys. Pituitary involvement in GPA is rare, present in about 1% of all cases of GPA. To date, only case reports or small case series have been published. Herein we report clinical features, imaging findings, treatment and outcomes in three patients with GPA-related pituitary dysfunction (PD).
METHODS
A retrospective analysis of three cases of GPA-related PD was conducted, followed by systematic review of the English medical literature using PubMed.
RESULTS
The three cases include three women aged between 32 and 37 years. PD was the presenting feature in one and two developed PD in the course of the disease. All patients had a pituitary lesion on MRI. Conventional treatment with high doses of glucocorticoids and cyclophosphamide led to resolution or improvement of the MRI abnormalities, whereas it was not effective in restoring PD. A systematic review identified 51 additional patients, showing that GPA can lead to partial or global PD, either at onset or, during the course of the disease. Secondary hypogonadism is the predominant manifestation, followed by diabetes insipidus (DI). Sellar mass with central cystic lesion is the most frequent radiological finding.
CONCLUSION
GPA should be carefully considered in patients with a sellar mass and unusual clinical presentation with DI and systemic disease. Although conventional induction-remission treatment improves systemic symptoms and radiological pituitary abnormalities, hormonal deficiencies persist in most of the patients. Therefore, follow-up should include both imaging and pituitary function assessment.
Topics: Adult; Cyclophosphamide; Diabetes Insipidus; Female; Glucocorticoids; Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis; Humans; Pituitary Diseases; Pituitary Gland; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 28540625
DOI: 10.1007/s11102-017-0811-0 -
Autoimmunity Reviews Apr 2022Fertility is thought to be not affected in women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), however disease-related factors, psychosocial effects of chronic disease, as... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Fertility is thought to be not affected in women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), however disease-related factors, psychosocial effects of chronic disease, as well as medications exposure might impair gonadal function.
OBJECTIVE
This systematic literature review (SLR) aimed to explore clinical, hormonal, serological and treatment factors associated with fertility outcomes in women of childbearing age with SLE.
METHODS
This SLR was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for systematic reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement. All articles available in English (1972 - 30th April 2021) in Pubmed, EMBASE, Scopus and Cochrane Library were screened. Studies selection and data collection were performed by two independent reviewers. All data were extracted using a standardized template. The risk of bias of the included studies was assessed using the NIH risk-of-bias tool.
RESULTS
Of 789 abstracts evaluated, we included in this review 46 studies, of which 1 SLR, 16 cross-sectional studies, 18 cohort studies, 10 observational studies and 1 case-series, with data pertaining to 4704 patients (mean age 31.5 ± 3.7 years, disease duration 83.27 ± 38.3 months). Definitions of premature ovarian failure (POF) adopted in the studies varied in terms of the number of months of amenorrhea considered and the age of onset of amenorrhea. Clinical factors associated with the development of POF were older age at the time of initiation of therapy, and older age at the onset of SLE disease. Cyclophosphamide exposure (CYC) and its cumulative dose influenced gonadal function in SLE women, leading to amenorrhoea and POF, as reported in 19 studies. Mycophenolate, azathioprine, calcineurin inhibitors and steroids associated with a lower risk of POF compared to CYC. POF was less frequent in patients co-treated with CYC and gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues (GnRH-a) compared with patients not receiving GnRH-a (risk ratio 0.28, 95%-CI [0.14; 0.55]). 11 studies evaluated the impact of damage accrual and disease activity on ovarian reserve with conflicting evidence. Finally, 18 studies investigated exposure to hormonal and serological factors and, among others, neither anti-Müllerian Hormone nor anti-corpus luteum antibodies were associated with POF.
CONCLUSION
The strongest evidence regarding management factors associated with fertility in SLE women of childbearing age remains the treatment with CYC, as well as its cumulative dosage. Hormonal and serological factors appeared not to impact fertility outcomes, but they might be used as a surrogate of fertility, especially during the treatment with disease-specific drugs.
Topics: Adult; Cross-Sectional Studies; Cyclophosphamide; Female; Fertility; Humans; Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic; Primary Ovarian Insufficiency
PubMed: 34995765
DOI: 10.1016/j.autrev.2022.103038 -
Autoimmunity Reviews Dec 2021Many therapies have been investigated for systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD), including immunosuppressive therapies, antifibrotic agents,... (Review)
Review
Many therapies have been investigated for systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD), including immunosuppressive therapies, antifibrotic agents, immunomodulators and monoclonal antibodies. There is a high unmet medical need to better understand the current evidence for treatment efficacy and safety. This systematic review aims to present the existing literature on different drug treatments investigated for SSc-ILD and to critically assess the level of evidence for these drugs. A systematic review was performed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A structured literature search was performed for clinical trials and observational studies on the treatment of SSc-ILD with pharmaceutical interventions from 1 January 1990 to 15 December 2020. The quality of each reference was assessed using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria. A total of 77 references were reviewed and 13 different treatments were identified. We found high-quality evidence for the use of cyclophosphamide, nintedanib, mycophenolate and tocilizumab. Therefore, we would posit that the clinical community has four valid options for treatment of SSc-ILD. Further research is mandatory to provide more evidence for the optimal treatment strategy in SSc-ILD, including the optimal time to initiate treatment, selection of patients for treatment and upfront combination therapy.
Topics: Antifibrotic Agents; Cyclophosphamide; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Lung Diseases, Interstitial; Scleroderma, Systemic
PubMed: 34718159
DOI: 10.1016/j.autrev.2021.102978 -
Journal of the American Academy of... Apr 2019This systematic review assesses effects of paternal exposure to dermatologic medications by using the former US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) pregnancy categories...
BACKGROUND
This systematic review assesses effects of paternal exposure to dermatologic medications by using the former US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) pregnancy categories as a benchmark.
OBJECTIVE
To assess whether systemic dermatologic medications can cause infertility and teratogenicity when taken by men.
METHODS
Categories D and X dermatologic medications were identified; a systematic review of the literature and reviews of the FDA Adverse Events Reporting System and prescribing information were performed to identify the effects of these medications on male fertility and teratogenicity. A secondary search was performed to assess for other systemic dermatologic medications causing teratogenicity or infertility following paternal exposure.
RESULTS
A total of 13 medications met the inclusion criteria. Of 1,032 studies identified, 19 were included after a systematic review of the literature. Studies evaluating medication effects with paternal exposure were identified for 10 of the 13 evaluated medications, and evidence of a negative effect was identified for 6 medications.
LIMITATIONS
We did not encounter any studies for 3 medications that met the inclusion criteria. Information submitted to the FDA Adverse Events Reporting System may not reflect the incidence of side effects.
CONCLUSIONS
Many former pregnancy category D and X systemic dermatologic medications also have effects on male fertility. More research and better-quality studies are required in this area, particularly studies assessing potential teratogenicity.
Topics: Acitretin; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Colchicine; Cyclophosphamide; Dermatologic Agents; Doxycycline; Finasteride; Humans; Infertility, Male; Isotretinoin; Male; Methotrexate; Paternal Exposure; Teratogenesis; Tetracycline; Thalidomide
PubMed: 30287313
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.09.031