-
Seizure Jul 2023The late onset myoclonic epilepsy in Down Syndrome (LOMEDS) is a peculiar epilepsy type characterized by cortical myoclonus and generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS),... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
The late onset myoclonic epilepsy in Down Syndrome (LOMEDS) is a peculiar epilepsy type characterized by cortical myoclonus and generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS), in people suffering from cognitive decline in Down syndrome (DS). In this review, we analyzed available data on the diagnostic and therapeutic management of individuals with LOMEDS.
METHODS
We performed a systematic search of the literature to identify the diagnostic and therapeutic management of patients with LOMEDS. The following databases were used: PubMed, Google Scholar, EMBASE, CrossRef. The protocol was registered on PROSPERO (registration code: CRD42023390748).
RESULTS
Data from 46 patients were included. DS was diagnosed according to the patient's clinical and genetic characteristics. Diagnosis of Alzheimer's dementia (AD) preceded the onset of epilepsy in all cases. Both myoclonic seizures (MS) and generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS) were reported, the latter preceding the onset of MS in 28 cases. EEG was performed in 45 patients, showing diffuse theta/delta slowing with superimposed generalized spike-and-wave or polyspike-and-wave. A diffuse cortical atrophy was detected in 34 patients on neuroimaging. Twenty-seven patients were treated with antiseizure medication (ASM) monotherapy, with reduced seizure frequency in 17 patients. Levetiracetam and valproic acid were the most used ASMs. Up to 41% of patients were unresponsive to first-line treatment and needed adjunctive therapy for seizure control.
CONCLUSIONS
AD-related pathological changes in the brain may play a role in LOMEDS onset, although the mechanism underlying this phenomenon is still unknown. EEG remains the most relevant investigation to be performed. A significant percentage of patients developed a first-line ASM refractory epilepsy. ASMs which modulate the glutamatergic system may represent a good therapeutic option.
Topics: Humans; Down Syndrome; Epilepsy; Epilepsies, Myoclonic; Levetiracetam; Seizures; Alzheimer Disease; Electroencephalography; Anticonvulsants; Epilepsy, Generalized
PubMed: 37267668
DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2023.05.017 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Apr 2017Topiramate is a newer broad-spectrum antiepileptic drug (AED). Some studies have shown the benefits of topiramate monotherapy in the treatment of juvenile myoclonic... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Topiramate is a newer broad-spectrum antiepileptic drug (AED). Some studies have shown the benefits of topiramate monotherapy in the treatment of juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME). However, there are no current systematic reviews to determine the efficacy and tolerability of topiramate monotherapy in people with JME. This is an updated version of the original Cochrane Review published in Issue 12, 2015.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of topiramate monotherapy in the treatment of JME.
SEARCH METHODS
For the latest update, on 21 February 2017 we searched Cochrane Epilepsy's Specialized Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and ClinicalTrials.gov. We also searched ongoing trials registers, reference lists and relevant conference proceedings, and contacted study authors and pharmaceutical companies.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating topiramate monotherapy versus placebo or other AED treatment for people with JME, with the outcomes of proportion of responders or experiencing adverse events (AEs).
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently screened the titles and abstracts of identified records, selected studies for inclusion, extracted data, cross-checked the data for accuracy and assessed the methodological quality. We performed no meta-analyses due to the limited available data.
MAIN RESULTS
We included three studies with 83 participants. For efficacy, a greater proportion of participants in the topiramate group had a 50% or more reduction in primarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures (PGTCS) compared with participants in the placebo group. There were no significant differences between topiramate versus valproate in participants responding with a 50% or more reduction in myoclonic seizures or in PGTCS or seizure-free. Concerning tolerability, we ranked AEDs associated with topiramate as moderate-to-severe, while we ranked 59% of AEDs linked to valproate as severe complaints. Moreover, systemic toxicity scores were higher in the valproate group than the topiramate group. We judged the quality of the evidence from the studies to be very low.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Since the last version of this review we found no new studies. This review does not provide sufficient evidence to support topiramate for the treatment of people with JME. Based on the current limited available data, topiramate seems to be better tolerated than valproate, but there were no more benefits of efficacy in topiramate compared with valproate. In the future, well-designed, double-blind RCTs with large samples are required to test the efficacy and tolerability of topiramate in people with JME.
Topics: Adolescent; Anticonvulsants; Child; Fructose; Humans; Myoclonic Epilepsy, Juvenile; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Seizures; Topiramate; Treatment Outcome; Valproic Acid; Young Adult
PubMed: 28434203
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010008.pub3 -
Children (Basel, Switzerland) Mar 2023Vitamin B6-dependent epilepsies include treatable diseases responding to pyridoxine or pyridoxal-5Iphosphate (ALDH7A1 deficiency, PNPO deficiency, PLP binding protein... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Vitamin B6-dependent epilepsies include treatable diseases responding to pyridoxine or pyridoxal-5Iphosphate (ALDH7A1 deficiency, PNPO deficiency, PLP binding protein deficiency, hyperprolinemia type II and hypophosphatasia and glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchor synthesis defects).
PATIENTS AND METHODS
We conducted a systematic review of published pediatric cases with a confirmed molecular genetic diagnosis of vitamin B6-dependent epilepsy according to PRISMA guidelines. Data on demographic features, seizure semiology, EEG patterns, neuroimaging, treatment, and developmental outcomes were collected.
RESULTS
497 published patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Seizure onset manifested at 59.8 ± 291.6 days (67.8% of cases in the first month of life). Clonic, tonic-clonic, and myoclonic seizures accounted for two-thirds of the cases, while epileptic spasms were observed in 7.6%. Burst-suppression/suppression-burst represented the most frequently reported specific EEG pattern (14.4%), mainly in PLPB, ALDH7A1, and PNPO deficiency. Pyridoxine was administered to 312 patients (18.5% intravenously, 76.9% orally, 4.6% not specified), and 180 also received antiseizure medications. Pyridoxine dosage ranged between 1 and 55 mg/kg/die. Complete seizure freedom was achieved in 160 patients, while a significant seizure reduction occurred in 38. PLP, lysine-restricted diet, and arginine supplementation were used in a small proportion of patients with variable efficacy. Global developmental delay was established in 30.5% of a few patients in whom neurocognitive tests were performed.
CONCLUSIONS
Despite the wide variability, the most frequent hallmarks of the epilepsy phenotype in patients with vitamin B6-dependent seizures include generalized or focal motor seizure semiology and a burst suppression/suppression burst pattern in EEG.
PubMed: 36980111
DOI: 10.3390/children10030553 -
Epilepsia Mar 2024KCTD7-related progressive myoclonic epilepsy (PME) is a rare autosomal-recessive disorder. This study aimed to describe the clinical details and genetic variants in a...
OBJECTIVE
KCTD7-related progressive myoclonic epilepsy (PME) is a rare autosomal-recessive disorder. This study aimed to describe the clinical details and genetic variants in a large international cohort.
METHODS
Families with molecularly confirmed diagnoses of KCTD7-related PME were identified through international collaboration. Furthermore, a systematic review was done to identify previously reported cases. Salient demographic, epilepsy, treatment, genetic testing, electroencephalographic (EEG), and imaging-related variables were collected and summarized.
RESULTS
Forty-two patients (36 families) were included. The median age at first seizure was 14 months (interquartile range = 11.75-22.5). Myoclonic seizures were frequently the first seizure type noted (n = 18, 43.9%). EEG and brain magnetic resonance imaging findings were variable. Many patients exhibited delayed development with subsequent progressive regression (n = 16, 38.1%). Twenty-one cases with genetic testing available (55%) had previously reported variants in KCTD7, and 17 cases (45%) had novel variants in KCTD7 gene. Six patients died in the cohort (age range = 1.5-21 years). The systematic review identified 23 eligible studies and further identified 59 previously reported cases of KCTD7-related disorders from the literature. The phenotype for the majority of the reported cases was consistent with a PME (n = 52, 88%). Other reported phenotypes in the literature included opsoclonus myoclonus ataxia syndrome (n = 2), myoclonus dystonia (n = 2), and neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis (n = 3). Eight published cases died over time (14%, age range = 3-18 years).
SIGNIFICANCE
This study cohort and systematic review consolidated the phenotypic spectrum and natural history of KCTD7-related disorders. Early onset drug-resistant epilepsy, relentless neuroregression, and severe neurological sequalae were common. Better understanding of the natural history may help future clinical trials.
Topics: Adolescent; Child; Child, Preschool; Humans; Infant; Young Adult; Electroencephalography; Epilepsies, Myoclonic; Myoclonic Epilepsies, Progressive; Potassium Channels; Seizures; Unverricht-Lundborg Syndrome
PubMed: 38231304
DOI: 10.1111/epi.17880 -
Epilepsy & Behavior : E&B Sep 2023Idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE) is a common epilepsy syndrome with early age onset and generally good seizure outcomes. This study aims to determine the incidence... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE) is a common epilepsy syndrome with early age onset and generally good seizure outcomes. This study aims to determine the incidence and predictive risk factors for drug-resistant IGE.
METHODS
We systematically searched three databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library) in November 2022 and included 12 eligible studies which reported long-term outcomes (mean = 14.05) after antiseizure medications (ASMs) from 2001 to 2020. We defined drug resistance as the persistence of any seizure despite ASMs treatment (whether as monotherapies or in combination) given the criteria of drug resistance varied in original studies. A random-effects model was used to evaluate the prevalence of refractory IGE. Studies reporting potential poor prognostic factors were included for subsequent subgroup meta-analysis.
RESULTS
The pooled prevalence of drug resistance in IGE cohorts was 27% (95% CI: 0.19-0.36). Subgroup analysis of the risk factors revealed that the psychiatric comorbidities (odds ratio (OR): 4.87, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.97-7.98), combined three seizure types (absences, myoclonic jerks, and generalized tonic-clonic seizures) (OR: 5.37, 95% CI: 3.16-9.13), the presence of absence seizure (OR: 4.38, 95% CI: 2.64-7.28), generalized polyspike trains (GPT) (OR: 4.83, 95% CI: 2.42-9.64), sex/catamenial epilepsy (OR: 3.25, 95% CI: 1.97-5.37), and status epilepticus (OR: 5.94, 95% CI: 2.23-15.85) increased the risk of poor prognosis. Other factors, including age onset, family history, and side effects of ASMs, were insignificantly associated with a higher incidence of refractory IGE.
CONCLUSION
Drug resistance is a severe complication of IGE. Further standardized research about clinical and electroencephalography factors is warranted.
Topics: Humans; Anticonvulsants; Prevalence; Epilepsy, Generalized; Seizures; Drug Resistant Epilepsy; Risk Factors; Immunoglobulin E
PubMed: 37523796
DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2023.109364 -
Seizure Jun 2024Sleep disturbances significantly impact the lives of individuals with Juvenile Myoclonic Epilepsy (JME). This study aimed to investigate sleep studies, disturbances, and... (Review)
Review
Sleep disturbances significantly impact the lives of individuals with Juvenile Myoclonic Epilepsy (JME). This study aimed to investigate sleep studies, disturbances, and the impact of anti-seizure drugs on sleep in JME patients. Relevant studies were retrieved from the National Library of Medicine (Pubmed) database and the Cochrane Library utilizing the search terms "Juvenile Myoclonic Epilepsy" and "sleep". A total of 160 papers' review, data extraction, and resolution of discrepancies were performed independently by two reviewers according to the PRISMA protocol and were registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023472439). A systematic review of 31 studies was conducted, encompassing various methodologies, including sleep questionnaires (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (n = 13), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (n = 10)), polysomnography (n = 8), EEG (n = 9), actigraphy (n = 1), and transcranial magnetic stimulation (n = 1). Most studies were hospital-based (n = 31), cross-sectional (n = 11), and prospective (n = 25). Patients with JME exhibit a higher prevalence of sleep disturbances, worse quality of sleep (n = 4), daytime sleepiness (n = 2), sleep efficiency (n = 7), and increased sleep latency (n = 1) compared to controls. These disruptions are characterized by increased wakefulness (n = 3), frequent arousals (n = 3), decreased REM sleep (n = 2), and conflicting NREM sleep findings (n = 3). Additional sleep-related issues observed in JME patients include insomnia (n = 1) and increased prevalence of parasomnias such as nightmares and sleep talking. Periodic limb movement and obstructive sleep apnea are similar or less frequent (3/28). REM behavioral disorders and sleepwalking were not seen. Valproate showed conflicting effects on sleep (n = 7), while levetiracetam did not impact sleep (n = 1). These findings underlined the need for more sufficient evidence of sleep studies in JME. Future research should prioritize understanding the nature of sleep in JME and its impact on management.
PubMed: 38908143
DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2024.05.014 -
Seizure Mar 2021Juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME), like other forms of idiopathic generalized epilepsy, shows a marked female predominance. However, few studies have specifically... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME), like other forms of idiopathic generalized epilepsy, shows a marked female predominance. However, few studies have specifically addressed the role of sex in its long-term prognosis. We performed a systematic review of the literature relevant to JME prognosis, focusing on sex-based differences in prognostic factors and outcome.
METHODS
A comprehensive literature search of the PubMed and Scopus databases was performed, considering all articles up to April 2020 in which long-term prognosis in JME had been explored and sex differences in outcome or prognostic factors were specified.
RESULTS
We included 25 articles published between 1984 and 2020. Sex differences in epilepsy outcome were explored by 21 of the 25 studies, but only three reported different outcomes in male vs female patients. All three found female sex to be associated with a later response to antiseizure medications, worse seizure control, and a higher risk of relapse in their entire study samples, which included JME patients. Eight studies found sex-based differences in possible predictors of long-term outcome: prolonged epileptiform EEG runs and the presence of eye closure sensitivity, both more frequent in women, were factors possibly linked to a poorer prognosis, as were praxis induction and generalized EEG asymmetric changes, which instead were more common in men. Valproate use, more frequent in men, was associated with a better outcome.
CONCLUSION
Most studies do not highlight sex differences in JME prognosis. However, some sex specificities do emerge, especially with regard to particular reflex traits and EEG abnormalities. Finally, sex may condition therapeutic choices, and thus have a possible impact on long-term outcome.
Topics: Electroencephalography; Female; Humans; Male; Myoclonic Epilepsy, Juvenile; Prognosis; Seizures; Sex Characteristics
PubMed: 33524768
DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2021.01.005 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Dec 2015Topiramate is a newer broad-spectrum of antiepileptic drug (AED). Some studies have shown the benefits of topiramate monotherapy in the treatment of juvenile myoclonic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Topiramate is a newer broad-spectrum of antiepileptic drug (AED). Some studies have shown the benefits of topiramate monotherapy in the treatment of juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME). However, there are no current systematic reviews to determine the efficacy and tolerability of topiramate monotherapy in people with JME.
OBJECTIVES
To determine the efficacy and tolerability of topiramate monotherapy in the treatment of JME.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Epilepsy Group Specialized Register (2 November 2015), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL via the Cochrane Register of Studies CRSO, 2 November 2015), MEDLINE (Ovid, 2 November 2015), EMBASE (1 July 2015) and ClinicalTrials.gov (2 November 2015). In an effort to identify further published, unpublished and ongoing trials, we searched ongoing trials registers, reference lists and relevant conference proceedings, and contacted authors and pharmaceutical companies.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating topiramate monotherapy versus placebo or other AED treatment for people with JME, with the outcomes of proportion of responders or experiencing adverse events (AEs).
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently screened the titles and abstracts of identified records, selected studies for inclusion, extracted data, cross-checked the data for accuracy and assessed the methodological quality. We performed no meta-analyses due to the limited available data.
MAIN RESULTS
We included three studies with 83 participants. For the efficacy, a greater proportion of participants in the topiramate group had a 50% or more reduction in primarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures (PGTCS) compared with participants in the placebo group. There were no significant differences between topiramate versus valproate in participants responding with a 50% or more reduction in myoclonic seizures or in PGTCS or seizure-free. Concerning tolerability, we ranked AEDs associated with topiramate as moderate-to-severe, while we ranked 59% of AEDs linked to valproate as severe complaints. Moreover, systemic toxicity scores were higher in the valproate group than the topiramate group. We judged the quality of the evidence from the studies to be very low.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
This review does not provide sufficient evidence to support topiramate for the treatment of people with JME. Based on the current limited available data, topiramate seems to be better tolerated than valproate, but there were no more benefits of efficacy in topiramate compared with valproate. In the future, well-designed, double-blind RCTs with large samples are required to test the efficacy and tolerability of topiramate in people with JME.
Topics: Adolescent; Anticonvulsants; Child; Fructose; Humans; Myoclonic Epilepsy, Juvenile; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Seizures; Topiramate; Treatment Outcome; Valproic Acid; Young Adult
PubMed: 26695884
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010008.pub2 -
EClinicalMedicine Nov 2022A third of people with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME) are drug-resistant. Three-quarters have a seizure relapse when attempting to withdraw anti-seizure medication...
Individualised prediction of drug resistance and seizure recurrence after medication withdrawal in people with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy: A systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
A third of people with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME) are drug-resistant. Three-quarters have a seizure relapse when attempting to withdraw anti-seizure medication (ASM) after achieving seizure-freedom. It is currently impossible to predict who is likely to become drug-resistant and safely withdraw treatment. We aimed to identify predictors of drug resistance and seizure recurrence to allow for individualised prediction of treatment outcomes in people with JME.
METHODS
We performed an individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis based on a systematic search in EMBASE and PubMed - last updated on March 11, 2021 - including prospective and retrospective observational studies reporting on treatment outcomes of people diagnosed with JME and available seizure outcome data after a minimum one-year follow-up. We invited authors to share standardised IPD to identify predictors of drug resistance using multivariable logistic regression. We excluded pseudo-resistant individuals. A subset who attempted to withdraw ASM was included in a multivariable proportional hazards analysis on seizure recurrence after ASM withdrawal. The study was registered at the Open Science Framework (OSF; https://osf.io/b9zjc/).
FINDINGS
Our search yielded 1641 articles; 53 were eligible, of which the authors of 24 studies agreed to collaborate by sharing IPD. Using data from 2518 people with JME, we found nine independent predictors of drug resistance: three seizure types, psychiatric comorbidities, catamenial epilepsy, epileptiform focality, ethnicity, history of CAE, family history of epilepsy, status epilepticus, and febrile seizures. Internal-external cross-validation of our multivariable model showed an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0·70 (95%CI 0·68-0·72). Recurrence of seizures after ASM withdrawal (n = 368) was predicted by an earlier age at the start of withdrawal, shorter seizure-free interval and more currently used ASMs, resulting in an average internal-external cross-validation concordance-statistic of 0·70 (95%CI 0·68-0·73).
INTERPRETATION
We were able to predict and validate clinically relevant personalised treatment outcomes for people with JME. Individualised predictions are accessible as nomograms and web-based tools.
FUNDING
MING fonds.
PubMed: 36467455
DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101732 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jan 2019Topiramate is a newer broad-spectrum antiepileptic drug (AED). Some studies have shown the benefits of topiramate in the treatment of juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME).... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Topiramate is a newer broad-spectrum antiepileptic drug (AED). Some studies have shown the benefits of topiramate in the treatment of juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME). However, there are no current systematic reviews to determine the efficacy and tolerability of topiramate in people with JME. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2015, and last updated in 2017.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of topiramate in the treatment of JME.
SEARCH METHODS
For the latest update, on 10 July 2018 we searched the Cochrane Register of Studies (CRS Web), which includes the Cochrane Epilepsy Group's Specialized Register and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE (Ovid 1946- ), and ClinicalTrials.gov. We also searched ongoing trials registers, reference lists and relevant conference proceedings, and contacted study authors and pharmaceutical companies.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating topiramate versus placebo or other AED treatment for people with JME, with the outcomes of proportion of responders and proportion of participants experiencing adverse events (AEs).
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently screened the titles and abstracts of identified records, selected studies for inclusion, extracted data, cross-checked the data for accuracy and assessed the methodological quality. We performed no meta-analyses due to the limited available data.
MAIN RESULTS
We included three studies with a total of 83 participants. For efficacy, a greater proportion of participants in the topiramate group had a 50% or more reduction in primarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures (PGTCS) compared with participants in the placebo group. There were no significant differences between topiramate and valproate in participants responding with a 50% or more reduction in myoclonic seizures or in PGTCS, or becoming seizure-free. Concerning tolerability, we ranked AEs associated with topiramate as moderate to severe, while we ranked 59% of AEs linked to valproate as severe complaints. Moreover, systemic toxicity scores were higher in the valproate group than the topiramate group.Overall we judged all three studies to be at high risk of attrition bias and at unclear risk of reporting bias. We judged all three studies to be at low to unclear bias for the remaining risk of bias domains (random sequence, allocation, blinding). We judged the quality of the evidence from the studies to be very low.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
We have found no new studies since the last version of this review was published in 2017. This review does not provide sufficient evidence to support topiramate for the treatment of people with JME. Based on the current limited available data, topiramate seems to be better tolerated than valproate, but has no clear benefits over valproate in terms of efficacy. Well-designed, double-blind RCTs with large samples are required to test the efficacy and tolerability of topiramate in people with JME.
Topics: Adolescent; Anticonvulsants; Child; Humans; Myoclonic Epilepsy, Juvenile; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Seizures; Topiramate; Treatment Outcome; Valproic Acid; Young Adult
PubMed: 30687937
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010008.pub4