-
Clinical Ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) 2023Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a leading cause of blindness. Early DR screening is essential, but the infrastructure can be less affordable in low resource countries. This... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a leading cause of blindness. Early DR screening is essential, but the infrastructure can be less affordable in low resource countries. This study aims to review the accuracy of low-cost smartphone-based fundus cameras for DR screening in adult patients with diabetes.
METHODS
We performed a systematic literature search to find studies that reported the sensitivity and specificity of low-cost smartphone-based devices for fundus photography in adult patients with diabetes. We searched three databases (MEDLINE, Google Scholar, Scopus) and one register (Cochrane CENTRAL). We presented the accuracy values by grouping the diagnosis into three: any DR, referrable DR, and diabetic macular oedema (DMO). Risk of bias and applicability of the studies were assessed using QUADAS-2.
RESULTS
Five out of 294 retrieved records were included with a total of six smartphone-based devices reviewed. All of the reference diagnostic methods used in the included studies were either indirect ophthalmoscopy or slit-lamp examinations and all smartphone-based devices' imaging protocols used mydriatic drops. The reported sensitivity and specificity for any DR were 52-92.2% and 73.3-99%; for referral DR were 21-91.4% and 64.9-100%; and for DMO were 29.4-81% and 95-100%, respectively.
CONCLUSION
Sensitivity available low-cost smartphone-based devices for DR screening were acceptable and their specificity particularly for detecting referrable DR and DMO were considerably good. These findings support their potential utilization for DR screening in a low resources setting.
PubMed: 37614846
DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S416422 -
International Journal of Ophthalmology 2020Non-simulator-based examination methods of the fundal examination have shown to be cost-effective. We reviewed different non-simulator-based direct fundoscopy... (Review)
Review
Non-simulator-based examination methods of the fundal examination have shown to be cost-effective. We reviewed different non-simulator-based direct fundoscopy examination methods used in undergraduate curricula and their outcomes. PubMed (MEDLINE) and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched using standard Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms ophthalmoscopy, medical education, undergraduate medical education, medical student, educational assessment and learning. The search included publications until 28 February 2019. We obtained 34 articles after screening abstracts; of them, 12 articles were included in the qualitative synthesis. The studies were comprised of diverse teaching methods which included fundal photograph matching with corresponding eye, continuous education using community-based eye clinics, formal instructions and demonstrations prior to skills training, ophthalmoscopy skills practice using eye pathologies, teaching versus conventional ophthalmoscopy and group-based teaching. We concluded that non-simulator-based techniques such as use of fundal photograph matching of an eye of a volunteer, introduction to eye pathologies, smaller student groups and formal instructions with video demonstrations prior to skills training were highly effective in teaching direct ophthalmoscopy for undergraduate medical students.
PubMed: 32399420
DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2020.04.20 -
Health Technology Assessment... Apr 2016Natural fluorescence in the eye may be increased or decreased by diseases that affect the retina. Imaging methods based on confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (cSLO)... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Natural fluorescence in the eye may be increased or decreased by diseases that affect the retina. Imaging methods based on confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (cSLO) can detect this 'fundus autofluorescence' (FAF) by illuminating the retina using a specific light 'excitation wavelength'. FAF imaging could assist the diagnosis or monitoring of retinal conditions. However, the accuracy of the method for diagnosis or monitoring is unclear.
OBJECTIVE
To conduct a systematic review to determine the accuracy of FAF imaging using cSLO for the diagnosis or monitoring of retinal conditions, including monitoring of response to therapy.
DATA SOURCES
Electronic bibliographic databases; scrutiny of reference lists of included studies and relevant systematic reviews; and searches of internet pages of relevant organisations, meetings and trial registries. Databases included MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science and the Medion database of diagnostic accuracy studies. Searches covered 1990 to November 2014 and were limited to the English language.
REVIEW METHODS
References were screened for relevance using prespecified inclusion criteria to capture a broad range of retinal conditions. Two reviewers assessed titles and abstracts independently. Full-text versions of relevant records were retrieved and screened by one reviewer and checked by a second. Data were extracted and critically appraised using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies criteria (QUADAS) for assessing risk of bias in test accuracy studies by one reviewer and checked by a second. At all stages any reviewer disagreement was resolved through discussion or arbitration by a third reviewer.
RESULTS
Eight primary research studies have investigated the diagnostic accuracy of FAF imaging in retinal conditions: choroidal neovascularisation (one study), reticular pseudodrusen (three studies), cystoid macular oedema (two studies) and diabetic macular oedema (two studies). Sensitivity of FAF imaging using an excitation wavelength of 488 nm was generally high (range 81-100%), but was lower (55% and 32%) in two studies using longer excitation wavelengths (514 nm and 790 nm, respectively). Specificity ranged from 34% to 100%. However, owing to limitations of the data, none of the studies provide conclusive evidence of the diagnostic accuracy of FAF imaging.
LIMITATIONS
No studies on the accuracy of FAF imaging for monitoring the progression of retinal conditions or response to therapy were identified. Owing to study heterogeneity, pooling of diagnostic outcomes in meta-analysis was not conducted. All included studies had high risk of bias. In most studies the patient spectrum was not reflective of those who would present in clinical practice and no studies adequately reported how FAF images were interpreted.
CONCLUSIONS
Although already in use in clinical practice, it is unclear whether or not FAF imaging is accurate, and whether or not it is applied and interpreted consistently for the diagnosis and/or monitoring of retinal conditions. Well-designed prospective primary research studies, which conform to the paradigm of diagnostic test accuracy assessment, are required to investigate the accuracy of FAF imaging in diagnosis and monitoring of inherited retinal dystrophies, early age-related macular degeneration, geographic atrophy and central serous chorioretinopathy.
STUDY REGISTRATION
This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42014014997.
FUNDING
The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.
Topics: Choroidal Neovascularization; Diabetic Retinopathy; Humans; Macular Edema; Optical Imaging; Prospective Studies; Retinal Diseases; Technology Assessment, Biomedical
PubMed: 27115052
DOI: 10.3310/hta20310 -
Acta Ophthalmologica May 2021To review studies focusing on cilioretinal arteries (CLRA) in order to assess the overall prevalence and establish the prevalence of CLRA in a Hungarian Caucasian...
PURPOSE
To review studies focusing on cilioretinal arteries (CLRA) in order to assess the overall prevalence and establish the prevalence of CLRA in a Hungarian Caucasian population. METHODS #1: Systematic literature review of published studies with at least 100 participants. METHODS #2: Non-mydriatic digital colour photographs were taken of 1000 consecutively enrolled healthy Caucasian young adult volunteers. Images were graded by two trained independent observers. Number and location of identified cilioretinal arteries were recorded and statistically analysed. RESULTS #1: Prevalence of CLRA ranges from 6.9% to 49.5%. Detection with fluorescein angiography yields the highest values followed by fundus photography and ophthalmoscopy. Unilateral presence of CLRA is between 70.30% and 93.65%, and temporal location is between 80.77% and 100%. RESULTS #2: We found at least one CLRA in 36.5% of the participants and in 22.75% of all the examined eyes. Cilioretinal arteries (CLRA) were unilateral in 75.34% and bilateral in 24.66%. Of all the identified CLRA, 96.16% were originating from the temporal rim of the optic disc. We identified at least one temporal CLRA supplying the macula in 28% of the participants and 16.95% of the examined eyes.
CONCLUSION
Prevalence of CLRA varies depending on identification method. Unilateral presence is unequivocally more frequent similarly to temporal location. From a risk of bias standpoint, high-quality studies are rare. Our data on the distribution pattern of CLRA are similar to that in the international literature. Based on our findings, we assume that slightly more than one-third of the Hungarian Caucasian population has a CLRA.
Topics: Ciliary Arteries; Cross-Sectional Studies; Female; Humans; Male; Prevalence; Prospective Studies; Retinal Artery; Retinal Diseases
PubMed: 32833328
DOI: 10.1111/aos.14592 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Nov 2015The diagnosis of glaucoma is traditionally based on the finding of optic nerve head (ONH) damage assessed subjectively by ophthalmoscopy or photography or by... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
The diagnosis of glaucoma is traditionally based on the finding of optic nerve head (ONH) damage assessed subjectively by ophthalmoscopy or photography or by corresponding damage to the visual field assessed by automated perimetry, or both. Diagnostic assessments are usually required when ophthalmologists or primary eye care professionals find elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) or a suspect appearance of the ONH. Imaging tests such as confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (HRT), optical coherence tomography (OCT) and scanning laser polarimetry (SLP, as used by the GDx instrument), provide an objective measure of the structural changes of retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) thickness and ONH parameters occurring in glaucoma.
OBJECTIVES
To determine the diagnostic accuracy of HRT, OCT and GDx for diagnosing manifest glaucoma by detecting ONH and RNFL damage.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched several databases for this review. The most recent searches were on 19 February 2015.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included prospective and retrospective cohort studies and case-control studies that evaluated the accuracy of OCT, HRT or the GDx for diagnosing glaucoma. We excluded population-based screening studies, since we planned to consider studies on self-referred people or participants in whom a risk factor for glaucoma had already been identified in primary care, such as elevated IOP or a family history of glaucoma. We only considered recent commercial versions of the tests: spectral domain OCT, HRT III and GDx VCC or ECC.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We adopted standard Cochrane methods. We fitted a hierarchical summary ROC (HSROC) model using the METADAS macro in SAS software. After studies were selected, we decided to use 2 x 2 data at 0.95 specificity or closer in meta-analyses, since this was the most commonly-reported level.
MAIN RESULTS
We included 106 studies in this review, which analysed 16,260 eyes (8353 cases, 7907 controls) in total. Forty studies (5574 participants) assessed GDx, 18 studies (3550 participants) HRT, and 63 (9390 participants) OCT, with 12 of these studies comparing two or three tests. Regarding study quality, a case-control design in 103 studies raised concerns as it can overestimate accuracy and reduce the applicability of the results to daily practice. Twenty-four studies were sponsored by the manufacturer, and in 15 the potential conflict of interest was unclear.Comparisons made within each test were more reliable than those between tests, as they were mostly based on direct comparisons within each study.The Nerve Fibre Indicator yielded the highest accuracy (estimate, 95% confidence interval (CI)) among GDx parameters (sensitivity: 0.67, 0.55 to 0.77; specificity: 0.94, 0.92 to 0.95). For HRT measures, the Vertical Cup/Disc (C/D) ratio (sensitivity: 0.72, 0.60 to 0.68; specificity: 0.94, 0.92 to 0.95) was no different from other parameters. With OCT, the accuracy of average RNFL retinal thickness was similar to the inferior sector (0.72, 0.65 to 0.77; specificity: 0.93, 0.92 to 0.95) and, in different studies, to the vertical C/D ratio.Comparing the parameters with the highest diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) for each device in a single HSROC model, the performance of GDx, HRT and OCT was remarkably similar. At a sensitivity of 0.70 and a high specificity close to 0.95 as in most of these studies, in 1000 people referred by primary eye care, of whom 200 have manifest glaucoma, such as in those who have already undergone some functional or anatomic testing by optometrists, the best measures of GDx, HRT and OCT would miss about 60 cases out of the 200 patients with glaucoma, and would incorrectly refer 50 out of 800 patients without glaucoma. If prevalence were 5%, e.g. such as in people referred only because of family history of glaucoma, the corresponding figures would be 15 patients missed out of 50 with manifest glaucoma, avoiding referral of about 890 out of 950 non-glaucomatous people.Heterogeneity investigations found that sensitivity estimate was higher for studies with more severe glaucoma, expressed as worse average mean deviation (MD): 0.79 (0.74 to 0.83) for MD < -6 db versus 0.64 (0.60 to 0.69) for MD ≥ -6 db, at a similar summary specificity (0.93, 95% CI 0.92 to 0.94 and, respectively, 0.94; 95% CI 0.93 to 0.95; P < 0.0001 for the difference in relative DOR).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
The accuracy of imaging tests for detecting manifest glaucoma was variable across studies, but overall similar for different devices. Accuracy may have been overestimated due to the case-control design, which is a serious limitation of the current evidence base.We recommend that further diagnostic accuracy studies are carried out on patients selected consecutively at a defined step of the clinical pathway, providing a description of risk factors leading to referral and bearing in mind the consequences of false positives and false negatives in the setting in which the diagnostic question is made. Future research should report accuracy for each threshold of these continuous measures, or publish raw data.
Topics: Diagnostic Errors; Glaucoma; Humans; Nerve Fibers; Odds Ratio; Ophthalmoscopy; Optic Disk; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Scanning Laser Polarimetry; Sensitivity and Specificity; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Visual Field Tests
PubMed: 26618332
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008803.pub2 -
JAMA Ophthalmology Jan 2021Red reflex testing is a simple and inexpensive method implemented in many countries as an important part of infant screening for ocular pathologies. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
IMPORTANCE
Red reflex testing is a simple and inexpensive method implemented in many countries as an important part of infant screening for ocular pathologies.
OBJECTIVES
To review the literature on the diagnostic accuracy of the red reflex test in infant screening for ocular pathologies and to perform meta-analyses to provide summary estimates.
DATA SOURCES
The following literature databases were searched for English-language, peer-reviewed literature, published until April 19, 2020: Cochrane Central, PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, BIOSIS Previews, Current Contents Connect, Data Citation Index, Derwent Innovations Index, KCI-Korean Journal Database, Russian Science Citation Index, SciELO Citation Index, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), and ClinicalTrials.gov.
STUDY SELECTION
Eligibility criteria were defined according to population (studies of consecutively screened infants), exposure (red reflex or Brückner test as the index test), comparator (any ophthalmological examination), and study type (any study with diagnostic test accuracy data).
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (PRISMA-DTA) guidelines were followed. Data were extracted independently by 2 authors. For summary estimates of diagnostic test accuracy, the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristics curve was used. Prevalence of ocular pathologies was introduced for a prevalence meta-analysis, which was then used in calculations of diagnostic accuracy of the red reflex test when applied in infant screening.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
True-positive, false-positive, true-negative, and false-negative findings; sensitivity; specificity; and positive and negative predictive values.
RESULTS
In this meta-analysis, 8713 unique infants from 5 unique studies were eligible for qualitative and quantitative review. All studies used the red reflex test without pupillary dilation and were compared with a reference test performed with pupillary dilation. For any ocular pathology, an estimated sensitivity of 7.5% (95% CI, 7.4%-7.5%) and specificity of 97.5% (95% CI, 97.5%-97.5%) was found. Focusing on ocular pathologies that required a medical or surgical intervention, sensitivity improved to 17.5% (95% CI, 0.8%-84.8%) and specificity remained high at 97.6% (95% CI, 87.7%-99.6%).
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
These findings suggest that an abnormal red reflex finding most likely reflects an underlying ocular pathology. However, a normal red reflex finding during screening does not exclude ocular disease.
Topics: Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Neonatal Screening; Ophthalmoscopes; Ophthalmoscopy; Predictive Value of Tests; Refraction, Ocular; Refractive Errors; Reproducibility of Results; Vision Screening; Vision, Ocular
PubMed: 33180103
DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.4854 -
JAMA Network Open Nov 2021The currently recommended method for screening for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy, which requires frequent eye examinations... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
IMPORTANCE
The currently recommended method for screening for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy, which requires frequent eye examinations entailing a heavy clinical workload. Weight gain-based algorithms have the potential to minimize the need for binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy and have been evaluated in different setups with variable results to predict type 1 or severe ROP.
OBJECTIVE
To synthesize evidence regarding the ability of postnatal weight gain-based algorithms to predict type 1 or severe ROP.
DATA SOURCES
PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched to identify studies published between January 2000 and August 2021.
STUDY SELECTION
Prospective and retrospective studies evaluating the ability of these algorithms to predict type 1 or severe ROP were included.
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
Two reviewers independently extracted data. This meta-analysis was performed according to the Cochrane guidelines and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (PRISMA-DTA) guidelines.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
Ability of algorithms to predict type 1 or sever ROP was measured using statistical indices (pooled sensitivity, specificity, and summary area under the receiver operating characteristic curves, as well as pooled negative likelihood ratios and positive likelihood ratios and diagnostic odds ratios).
RESULTS
A total of 61 studies (>37 000 infants) were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled estimates for sensitivity and specificity, respectively, were 0.89 (95% CI, 0.85-0.92) and 0.57 (95% CI, 0.51-0.63) for WINROP (Weight, IGF-1 [insulinlike growth factor 1], Neonatal, ROP), 1.00 (95% CI, 0.88-1.00) and 0.60 (95% CI, 0.15-0.93) for G-ROP (Postnatal Growth and ROP), 0.95 (95% CI, 0.71-0.99) and 0.52 (95% CI, 0.36-0.68) for CHOP ROP (Children's Hospital of Philadelphia ROP), 0.99 (95% CI, 0.73-1.00) and 0.49 (95% CI, 0.03-0.74) for ROPScore, 0.98 (95% CI, 0.94-0.99) and 0.35 (95% CI, 0.22-0.51) for CO-ROP (Colorado ROP). The original PINT (Premature Infants in Need of Transfusion) ROP study reported a sensitivity of 0.98 (95% CI, 0.91-0.99) and a specificity of 0.36 (95% CI, 0.30-0.42). The pooled negative likelihood ratios were 0.19 (95% CI, 0.13-0.27) for WINROP, 0.0 (95% CI, 0.00-0.32) for G-ROP, 0.10 (95% CI, 0.02-0.53) for CHOP ROP, 0.03 (95% CI, 0.00-0.77) for ROPScore, and 0.07 (95% CI, 0.03-0.16) for CO-ROP. The pooled positive likelihood ratios were 2.1 (95% CI, 1.8-2.4) for WINROP, 2.5 (95% CI, 0.7-9.1) for G-ROP, 2.0 (95% CI, 1.5-2.6) for CHOP ROP, 1.9 (95% CI, 1.1-3.3) for ROPScore, and 1.5 (95% CI, 1.2-1.9) for CO-ROP.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
This study suggests that weight gain-based algorithms have adequate sensitivity and negative likelihood ratios to provide reasonable certainty in ruling out type 1 ROP or severe ROP. Given the implications of missing even a single case of severe ROP, algorithms with very high sensitivity (close to 100%) and low negative likelihood ratios (close to zero) need to be chosen to safely reduce the number of unnecessary examinations in infants at lower risk of severe ROP.
Topics: Algorithms; Birth Weight; Early Diagnosis; Female; Forecasting; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Infant, Premature; Infant, Premature, Diseases; Male; Neonatal Screening; Philadelphia; Prognosis; Prospective Studies; Retinopathy of Prematurity; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Sensitivity and Specificity; Weight Gain
PubMed: 34812847
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.35879 -
Acta Ophthalmologica Feb 2024Optic disc drusen (ODD) are calcium-containing deposits in the optic nerve head, capable of causing visual field defects and sudden visual loss. The underlying... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Optic disc drusen (ODD) are calcium-containing deposits in the optic nerve head, capable of causing visual field defects and sudden visual loss. The underlying pathophysiology remains inadequately understood and treatment options are missing. In this paper, we systematically reviewed prevalence studies of ODD in non-selected populations to provide an overview of its prevalence, conducted meta-analyses to determine modality-specific prevalence estimates and performed a forecasting study to estimate current and future global population number of individuals with ODD. We searched 11 literature databases on 25 October 2022 for prevalence studies of ODD in non-selected populations. Eight eligible studies provided data from a total of 27 463 individuals. Prevalence estimates were stratified according to diagnostic modalities: ophthalmoscopy 0.37% (95% CI: 0.10-0.95%), fundus photography 0.12% (95% CI: 0.03-0.24%), spectral domain optical coherence tomography with enhanced depth imaging 2.21% (95% CI: 1.25-3.42%) and histopathology 1.82% (95% CI: 1.32-2.38%). Using histopathology-based summary prevalence estimate, we forecast 145 million individuals with ODD currently, a number expected to increase further due to world population growth. These numbers underscore the importance of including ODD in health education and highlight the necessity of continuing research in ODD.
Topics: Humans; Optic Disk; Optic Disk Drusen; Prevalence; Tomography, Optical Coherence
PubMed: 37144704
DOI: 10.1111/aos.15690 -
Current Eye Research Jul 2022To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the wide-field digital retinal imaging (WFDRI) for the detection of Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP) in premature infants as... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the wide-field digital retinal imaging (WFDRI) for the detection of Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP) in premature infants as compared to the binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy (BIO).
METHODS
This systematic review and meta-analysis included the publications searched through PubMed (Medline), EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library databases and Clinical Trials. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS)-2, the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic, meta-regression, publication bias analyses, and the GRADE methodology for the certainty of the overall evidence were conducted. The pooled effect sizes of the sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR) and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were calculated.
RESULTS
Total sixteen eligible studies from 10 articles were included with total 2,537 image interpretations from 697 premature infants. Less than 50% risk of bias and low concern were found in each domain across all articles by QUADAS-2. The pooled effect sizes showed the sensitivity of 0.77 (95% confidence interval (C.I.): 0.69-0.84), specificity of 0.96 (95% C.I.: 0.92-0.98), PLR of 20.9 (95% C.I.: 10.2-42.5), NLR of 0.23 (95% C.I.: 0.17-0.33) and DOR of 89 (95% C.I.: 43-185) as compared to BIO. The income level, setting, mean/median birth weight and gestational age contributed to the significant differences in sensitivity ( < 0.001). No publication bias was found among these 16 studies. The GRADE quality of evidence showed moderate for the pooled sensitivity and high for the pooled specificity.
CONCLUSIONS
The diagnostic accuracy based on WFDRI is substantial and comparable to BIO, supporting its application in the ROP screening programs.
Topics: Humans; Infant, Newborn; Infant, Premature; Neonatal Screening; Ophthalmoscopy; Retina; Retinopathy of Prematurity; Sensitivity and Specificity
PubMed: 35435102
DOI: 10.1080/02713683.2022.2050262