-
Infectious Diseases (London, England) Dec 2022Occult Hepatitis B virus infection (OBI) is of great significance to the transmission of Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and the evolution of the patient's clinical outcome. We... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
Occult Hepatitis B virus infection (OBI) is of great significance to the transmission of Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and the evolution of the patient's clinical outcome. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the prevalence of OBI in Asia.
METHODS
Literature search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Library database, Web of Science and Embase with the keywords of 'Hepatitis B virus', 'occult infection', 'prevalence'. 70 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Meta-analysis was performed using random-effects models to calculate the pooled prevalence of OBI and 95% confidence interval (CI). The data were analyzed in R 4.1.2.
RESULTS
The overall prevalence of OBI was 4% (95%CI: 0.03-0.06) in Asia. Subgroup analysis based on geographic region showed a prevalence of 3% (95%CI 0.02-0.06) in East Asia, 9% (95%CI 0.05-0.15) in West Asia, 3% (95%CI 0.01-0.11) in Southern Asia and 9% (95%CI 0.05-0.15) in Southeast Asia. Subgroup analysis demonstrated a prevalence of 1% (95%CI 0.00-0.02) in general population, 5% (95%CI: 0.03-0.08) in high-risk population, 9% (95%CI: 0.03-0.22) in the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patient, 18% (95%CI: 0.09-0.32) in the hepatopathy patients.
CONCLUSION
Based on the meta-analysis of the prevalence of OBI in different populations, we concluded that the prevalence of OBI in the high-risk population, hepatopathy patients, and HIV-infected patients was higher than that in the general population. A systematic review showed that OBI was associated with disease progression and prognosis. Therefore, these populations should be routinely screened for OBI and promptly intervened to avoid promoting disease progression.
Topics: Humans; Hepatitis B virus; Hepatitis B Surface Antigens; DNA, Viral; Hepatitis B; Hepatitis B, Chronic; HIV Infections; Asia; Disease Progression
PubMed: 36047593
DOI: 10.1080/23744235.2022.2115126 -
PloS One 2022Due to their common routes of transmission, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) coinfection with hepatitis B virus (HBV) and/or hepatitis C virus (HCV) has become a major... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Epidemiology of hepatitis B virus and/or hepatitis C virus infections among people living with human immunodeficiency virus in Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
INTRODUCTION
Due to their common routes of transmission, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) coinfection with hepatitis B virus (HBV) and/or hepatitis C virus (HCV) has become a major public health problem worldwide, particularly in Africa, where these viruses are endemic. Few systematic reviews report the epidemiological data of HBV and/or HCV coinfection with HIV in Africa, and none provided data on the case fatality rate (CFR) associated with this coinfection. This study was conducted to investigate the prevalence and case fatality rate of HBV and/or HCV infections among people living with human immunodeficiency virus (PLHIV) in Africa.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review of published articles in PubMed, Web of Science, African Journal Online, and African Index Medicus up to January 2022. Manual searches of references from retrieved articles and grey literature were also performed. The meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model. Sources of heterogeneity were investigated using subgroup analysis, while funnel plots and Egger tests were performed to assess publication bias.
RESULTS
Of the 4388 articles retrieved from the databases, 314 studies met all the inclusion criteria. The overall HBV case fatality rate estimate was 4.4% (95% CI; 0.7-10.3). The overall seroprevalences of HBV infection, HCV infection, and HBV/HCV coinfection in PLHIV were 10.5% [95% CI = 9.6-11.3], 5.4% [95% CI = 4.6-6.2], and 0.7% [95% CI = 0.3-1.0], respectively. The pooled seroprevalences of current HBsAg, current HBeAg, and acute HBV infection among PLHIV were 10.7% [95% CI = 9.8-11.6], 7.0% [95% CI = 4.7-9.7], and 3.6% [95% CI = 0.0-11.0], respectively. Based on HBV-DNA and HCV-RNA detection, the seroprevalences of HBV and HCV infection in PLHIV were 17.1% [95% CI = 11.5-23.7] and 2.5% [95% CI = 0.9-4.6], respectively. Subgroup analysis showed substantial heterogeneity.
CONCLUSIONS
In Africa, the prevalence of hepatotropic viruses, particularly HBV and HCV, is high in PLHIV, which increases the case fatality rate. African public health programs should emphasize the need to apply and comply with WHO guidelines on viral hepatitis screening and treatment in HIV-coinfected patients.
REVIEW REGISTRATION
PROSPERO, CRD42021237795.
Topics: Africa; Coinfection; HIV; HIV Infections; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis B; Hepatitis B virus; Hepatitis C; Humans
PubMed: 35639675
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269250 -
Journal of Viral Hepatitis Jul 2019Therapeutic vaccines may be promising treatments for chronic hepatitis B (CHB), but their clinical efficacy and safety are unclear. We conducted a systematic review of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Therapeutic vaccines may be promising treatments for chronic hepatitis B (CHB), but their clinical efficacy and safety are unclear. We conducted a systematic review of the evidence for the efficacy and safety of therapeutic vaccines in CHB patients. We searched PubMed, EMBASE and Google Scholar from 1990 until present and abstracts from EASL, APASL and AASLD from 2012 to 2017 and selected randomized controlled trials of CHB patients, comparing therapeutic vaccines with no treatment or standard of care. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool v2.0 and GRADE method were used. Analyses were stratified by hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) status and the comparator (therapeutic vaccines vs no treatment, or therapeutic vaccines + standard of care vs standard of care). Efficacy outcomes were HBeAg seroconversion, hepatitis B virus DNA reduction and hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) loss, measured at the end of treatment or end of follow-up. Effects were reported as risk differences with 95% confidence intervals using a random effects model. Fifteen studies were included. A wide variety of therapeutic vaccines were tested. For HBeAg clearance at the end of follow-up, when comparing therapeutic vaccines vs no therapy, RD = 0.01, 95% CI -0.05 to 0.07, and when comparing therapeutic vaccines + standard of care vs standard of care, RD = 0.03, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.09. For HBVDNA reduction at the end of follow-up, when comparing therapeutic vaccines vs no therapy, RD = -0.03, 95% CI -0.08 to 0.02, and when comparing therapeutic vaccines + standard of care, RD = 0.15, 95% CI 0.02-0.28. There were only a few studies on HBsAg loss, and hence, the findings were inconclusive. The only efficacy finding was HBVDNA reduction at the end of follow-up for therapeutic vaccines + standard of care vs standard of care; otherwise, therapeutic vaccines do not appear to be efficacious for the treatment of CHB, but were limited by few RCTs, suboptimal therapeutic vaccines and patient selection.
Topics: Hepatitis B Surface Antigens; Hepatitis B Vaccines; Hepatitis B e Antigens; Hepatitis B virus; Hepatitis B, Chronic; Humans; Publication Bias; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome; Vaccination
PubMed: 30801899
DOI: 10.1111/jvh.13085 -
Acta Histochemica Jan 2024The combined pathogenesis of Aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) and several viruses such as HBV, EBV and influenza virus have been investigated yet the molecular mechanism of their... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
The combined pathogenesis of Aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) and several viruses such as HBV, EBV and influenza virus have been investigated yet the molecular mechanism of their interaction and possible synergistic effects is not fully understood.
OBJECTIVES
The aim of the current systematic review was to review in-vitro and in-vivo studies investigating the combined pathogenesis of aflatoxins and viruses.
METHODS
This systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PECO (Population, Exposure, Comparator, and Outcome) criteria for invitro and invivo studies were used to evaluate the eligibility of the studies for systematic review.
RESULTS
21 studies were eligible for qualitative analysis based on the inclusion criteria. Of all the included studies, 9 (42.9 %) were invivo, 7 (33.3 %) were invitro-invivo and 5(23.8) articles conducted only invitro assay. Furthermore 14 (66.6 %) article explored hepatitis B virus (HBV) combination with AFB1, 4 (19 %) studied influenza A virus (SIV), 2 (9.7 %) were about Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and only 1 (4.7 %) included hepatitis C virus (HCV).
CONCLUSION
The limited collected evidence suggests that AFB1 enhanced EBV and influenza virus pathogenesis. AFB1 also operated as a cofactor for HBV and EBV-mediated carcinogenesis. On the other hand HBV and HCV also induced AFB-1 carcinogenesis. Due to the limited amount of included studies and the inconsistency of their results further studies especially on HBV and SIV are essential for better understanding of their combined mechanisms.
Topics: Humans; Aflatoxin B1; Epstein-Barr Virus Infections; Herpesvirus 4, Human; Hepatitis B virus; Carcinogenesis; Hepatitis C
PubMed: 38101290
DOI: 10.1016/j.acthis.2023.152116 -
American Journal of Obstetrics and... Aug 2022This study investigated the efficacy and safety of pharmacologic interventions to prevent vertical transmission of the hepatitis B virus. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Comparative efficacy and safety of pharmacologic interventions to prevent mother-to-child transmission of hepatitis B virus: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
OBJECTIVE
This study investigated the efficacy and safety of pharmacologic interventions to prevent vertical transmission of the hepatitis B virus.
DATA SOURCES
Medline, Cochrane, and Scopus databases were searched up to October 28, 2020.
STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
All randomized controlled trials reporting vertical hepatitis B virus transmission with pharmacologic intervention were included.
METHODS
Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias tool, version 2. Treatment efficacy was estimated using stratified network meta-analysis on the basis of maternal hepatitis B envelope antigen status.
RESULTS
Nineteen studies were included for mothers positive for hepatitis B surface and envelope antigens. Pooling indicated that a combination of hepatitis B vaccination and hepatitis B immunoglobulin in infants significantly reduced transmission risk compared with vaccination alone, with a risk ratio of 0.52 (95% confidence interval; 0.30-0.91). Only the addition of maternal tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, but not telbivudine, lamivudine, or maternal hepatitis B immunoglobulin further reduced transmission risk compared with a combination of hepatitis B vaccination and hepatitis B immunoglobulin in infants, with a pooled risk ratio of 0.10 (0.03-0.35). Twelve studies conducted in mothers with hepatitis B surface antigen positivity and mixed, unknown, or negative hepatitis B envelope antigen status provided limited evidence to suggest that maternal hepatitis B immunoglobulin combined with hepatitis B vaccination and immunoglobulin in infants was the likely best treatment, but this failed to reach statistical significance compared with a combination of hepatitis B vaccination and immunoglobulin in infants. Similarly, infant hepatitis B immunoglobulin, added to vaccination, likely provides additional benefit but failed to reach statistical significance.
CONCLUSION
A combination of hepatitis B vaccination and immunoglobulin in infants is the cornerstone for prevention of vertical transmission for mothers positive for both hepatitis B surface and envelope antigens. The addition of maternal tenofovir to this infant combination regimen was considered the likely most effective treatment. For infants of mothers with hepatitis B surface antigen positivity and mixed, unknown, or negative hepatitis B envelop antigen status, no additional agents provided further benefit beyond hepatitis B vaccination alone.
Topics: Antiviral Agents; Female; Hepatitis B; Hepatitis B Surface Antigens; Hepatitis B virus; Humans; Immunoglobulins; Infant; Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical; Network Meta-Analysis; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious; Tenofovir; Viral Load
PubMed: 35263648
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.02.042 -
International Journal of Clinical... Oct 2016Background Multiple studies have compared the efficacy of entecavir with lamivudine in preventing hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation among HBV-carrying lymphoma... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis Review
Background Multiple studies have compared the efficacy of entecavir with lamivudine in preventing hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation among HBV-carrying lymphoma patients with chemotherapy treatment. However, the results were slightly varied. Aim of the review to combine the findings of independent studies assessing the clinical efficacy of the two drugs using a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods PubMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), Chongqing VIP and WanFang Data were retrieved. Two independent reviewers evaluated the study eligibility and extracted eight studies, with 770 patients in total. The meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.3 and STATA software. Results HBV-carrying lymphoma patients receiving lamivudine during chemotherapy had a statistically significantly higher odds of HBV reactivation compared to those receiving entecavir (OR 5.0, 95 % CI 2.85-8.78, P < 0.001). The odds of hepatitis, HBV-Reactivation caused hepatitis and chemotherapy disruption was statistically significantly elevated in the patient group receiving lamivudine compared to the entecavir group (OR 4.12, 95 % CI 1.70-9.98, P = 0.002; OR 11.44, 95 % CI 2.70-48.52, P < 0.001; OR 6.71, 95 % CI 2.34-19.26, P < 0.001, respectively). Furthermore, the HBV reactivation rate in Ann Arbor stages I - II patient group was statistically significantly lower than the one in Ann Arbor stages III-IV group, with an overall pooled value of 0.37 (95 % CI 0.17-0.82, P = 0.01). Conclusion The metaanalysis result suggested that among HBV-carrying lymphoma patients undergoing chemotherapy, entecavir is more effective than lamivudine in preventing HBV reactivation.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Antiviral Agents; Guanine; Hepatitis B; Hepatitis B virus; Humans; Lamivudine; Lymphoma; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 27450506
DOI: 10.1007/s11096-016-0358-6 -
Digestive and Liver Disease : Official... Aug 2018Time-varying impact of anti-viral therapy on liver stiffness in patients with hepatitis B is unclear. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Time-varying impact of anti-viral therapy on liver stiffness in patients with hepatitis B is unclear.
AIMS
To estimate the magnitude and kinetics of change in liver stiffness in hepatitis B patients treated with nucleot(s)ide analogs.
METHODS
Through a systematic review of multiple databases, we identified 24 studies in adults with hepatitis B who underwent transient elastography before and at least 6 months after starting nucleot(s)ide analogs therapy. We estimated change in liver stiffness 6 m, 12 m, 24 m, 36 m and 60 m after starting therapy, as weighted mean difference and 95% confidence intervals, using random-effects meta-analysis.
RESULTS
Liver stiffness significantly declined by 2.21 kPa (95% CI, -1.36 to -3.05), 2.56 kPa (-2.23 to -2.89), 3.73 kPa (-2.98 to -4.49), 4.15 kPa (-2.75 to -5.54), and 5.19 kPa (-3.34 to -7.03) at 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, and 5 years from the start of therapy, respectively (p < 0.001). High baseline alanine aminotransferase level, viral load and liver stiffness were associated with greater magnitude of decline in liver stiffness.
CONCLUSIONS
Antiviral therapy is associated with progressive decline in liver stiffness in patients with hepatitis B, particularly in patients with high baseline alanine aminotransferase and viral load.
Topics: Alanine Transaminase; Antiviral Agents; Elasticity Imaging Techniques; Hepatitis B virus; Hepatitis B, Chronic; Humans; Liver; Liver Cirrhosis; Viral Load
PubMed: 29807871
DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2018.05.005 -
BMC Cancer Feb 2024Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infections is an important public health problem worldwide and closely affect extrahepatic cancer. Several recent studies have investigated the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infections is an important public health problem worldwide and closely affect extrahepatic cancer. Several recent studies have investigated the relationship between HBV infection and head and neck cancer (HNC), but their findings were inconsistent.In order to address the limitations of small sample sizes, we conducted a meta-analysis to assess the association between HBV and HNC.
METHODS
We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure from inception to August 2023. Original articles published as a case-control or cohort study were included. HBV infection was identified by HBsAg, HBV DNA or ICD codes. Review articles, meeting abstracts, case reports, communications, editorials and letters were excluded, as were studies in a language other than English or Chinese. According to the MOOSE guidelines, frequencies reported for all dichotomous variables were extracted by two reviewers independently. Similarly, the outcomes of OR, RR or HR, and 95% CIs after adjusting for age and gender were collected.
RESULTS
Thirteen relevant studies and 58,006 patients with HNC were included. Our analysis revealed a positive correlation between HBV and HNC (OR = 1.50; 95% CI: 1.28-1.77). After adjusting for age and gender, the similar result (OR = 1.30; 95% CI: 1.10-1.54) was obtained. Subgroup analysis further demonstrated a significant association between HBV infection and oral cancer (OR = 1.24; 95% CI: 1.05-1.47), as well as nasopharyngeal carcinoma (OR = 1.41; 95% CI: 1.26-1.58). However, due to the limited number of studies included, the statistical significance was not reached for cancer of the oropharynx (OR = 1.82; 95% CI: 0.66-5.05), hypopharynx (OR = 1.33; 95% CI: 0.88-2.00), and larynx (OR = 1.25; 95% CI: 0.69-2.24) after adjusting for age and gender. When excluding the interference of HIV/HCV, smoking and alcohol use, the final outcome (OR = 1.17; 95% CI: 1.01-1.35) got the same conclusion.
CONCLUSIONS
Our study confirmed a positive relationship between HNC, specifically oral cancer and nasopharyngeal carcinoma, and HBV infection. However, further investigation is required at the molecular level to gather additional evidence in HNC.
Topics: Humans; Hepatitis B virus; Cohort Studies; Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma; Hepatitis B; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms; Mouth Neoplasms
PubMed: 38365701
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-11967-7 -
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics Jul 2021Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is one the most common in the world. Aim of this study is to perform a systematic review on the relationship between HBV vaccination... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is one the most common in the world. Aim of this study is to perform a systematic review on the relationship between HBV vaccination and multiple sclerosis. Research was conducted on Pubmed, ISI Web of Science, and Scopus. Terms " and "" were used. Meta-analysis and metaregression were performed. 414 papers were found. Seven articles were selected. For the reported crude risk estimates for MS no statistically significant association was observed with pooled OR 1,19 (95%CI: 0,96-1,49). For the adjusted ORs, the pooled odds ratio (OR) was 0, 965 (95%CI: 0,886- 1,051). Meta regression show that year of publication is negatively (β: -0,019; P < 0.001) and NOS score and publishing in Europe are positively associated with O.R. value. Funnel plot showed the presence of publication bias. Results showed that Hepatitis B vaccination is not associated with an increased risk of developing MS.
Topics: Europe; Hepatitis B; Hepatitis B Vaccines; Hepatitis B virus; Humans; Multiple Sclerosis
PubMed: 30260264
DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2018.1528835 -
Clinical Gastroenterology and... Feb 2021Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and entecavir are recommended as first-line treatments for chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. However, there is debate over... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND & AIMS
Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and entecavir are recommended as first-line treatments for chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. However, there is debate over the comparative effectiveness of these drugs in preventing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of TDF vs entecavir in reducing the incidence of HCC among patients with chronic HBV infection.
METHODS
We performed a systematic review of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library from 2010 through 2019 for full-text articles and conference abstracts on studies of effects of TDF vs entecavir in patients with HBV infection. Extracted data were analyzed with the random-effects model. Potential sources of heterogeneity were investigated using sensitivity, meta-regression, and subgroup analyses.
RESULTS
Our final analysis comprised 15 studies (61,787 patients; 16,101 patients given TDF and 45,686 given entecavir). TDF treatment was associated with a significantly lower risk of HCC than entecavir (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.69-0.93; P = .003; I = 13%). The lower risk of HCC in patients given TDF compared with entecavir persisted in sensitivity and subcohort analyses performed with propensity score-matched cohorts and cirrhosis subcohorts. Inclusion of patients with decompensated cirrhosis and the sample size were the factors with the largest effects on between-study heterogeneity in meta-regression analyses. Subsequent subgroup analyses showed no statistical differences in the incidence of death or transplantation (hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.73-1.17; P = .519; I = 6%) between patients given TDF vs entecavir.
CONCLUSIONS
In a meta-analysis of studies of patients with chronic HBV infection, we found that TDF treatment was associated with a significantly lower (20%) risk of HCC than entecavir treatment. Randomized trials are needed to support this finding.
Topics: Antiviral Agents; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Guanine; Hepatitis B virus; Hepatitis B, Chronic; Humans; Liver Neoplasms; Tenofovir; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 32407970
DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.05.008