-
Clinical Oral Implants Research Jul 2017The goal of this meta-analysis was to evaluate how muscular activity, measured by electromyography (EMG), differs among edentulous patients treated with a complete... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
EMG correlations of edentulous patients with implant overdentures and fixed dental prostheses compared to conventional complete dentures and dentates: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
OBJECTIVES
The goal of this meta-analysis was to evaluate how muscular activity, measured by electromyography (EMG), differs among edentulous patients treated with a complete denture (CD), removable implant overdentures (IO), implant-retained fixed dental prostheses (IFDP), and dentates. The differences during clenching and chewing were of particular interest.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
An electronic literature review was carried out on MEDLINE (Pubmed) and the Cochrane Library covering the period January 1980 through September 2013. This was accomplished independently by three different reviewers and supplemented by a manual search. The review included randomized controlled trials, controlled clinical trials, and clinical trials which evaluated surface electromyography, bite force, chewing, and implants or complete dentures. In addition, the research was adjusted using MeSH terms.
RESULTS
The search garnered 646 titles and abstracts. Sixteen articles which met the inclusion criteria were analyzed. The effect size for muscular activity after implant support increased after therapy during clenching 2.18 (95% CI: 1.14, 3.23) and during chewing 1.45 (95%CI: 1.21, 1.69). Moreover, the EMG data of IO and IFDP groups (pooled) were lower than that of dentate control subjects during clenching (effect size: -1.01 [95%CI: -1.37, -0.65]). In contrast, the IFDP-wearers showed higher values than dentates during chewing. Among the edentulous control patients, the IO and IFDP groups (pooled) displayed higher values during clenching (effect size: 1.12 [95%CI: 0.7, 1.55]) and chewing (effect size: 1.33 [95%CI: -0.57, 2.10]). Furthermore, the muscular activity during chewing correlated with the hardness of the food.
CONCLUSION
In general, edentulous patients with CDs can achieve a greater degree of muscular activity after rehabilitation with IOs during clenching and chewing. During clenching, patients with IFDPs achieved higher values than those with dentates. The muscular activity increases with the hardness of the food.
Topics: Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported; Denture, Complete; Denture, Overlay; Electromyography; Humans; Masticatory Muscles; Mouth, Edentulous
PubMed: 27302014
DOI: 10.1111/clr.12874 -
Journal of Dentistry Feb 2017The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the use of mini implants to retain complete overdentures in terms of survival rates of mini implants, marginal bone... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the use of mini implants to retain complete overdentures in terms of survival rates of mini implants, marginal bone loss, satisfaction, and quality of life.
DATA
This report followed the PRISMA Statement and PICO question. This review has been registered at PROSPERO under the number CRD42016036141.
SOURCE
Two independent reviewers performed a comprehensive search of studies published until September 2016 and listed in the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and The Cochrane Library databases. The focused question was: is the use of mini implants feasible for prosthodontic rehabilitation with complete overdentures?
RESULTS
The 24 studies selected for review evaluated 1273 patients whose mean age was 65.93 years; these patients had received 2494 mini implants and 386 standard implants for retaining overdenture prosthesis. The mean follow-up time was 2.48 years (range: 1-7 years). There was a higher survival rate of mini implants (92.32%). More frequent failures for maxillary (31.71%) compared with mandibular arches (4.89%). The majority of studies revealed marginal bone loss values similar to those of standard implants (<1.5mm). All studies verified an increase in satisfaction and quality of life after rehabilitation treatment with mini dental implants.
CONCLUSION
The present systematic review indicates that the use of mini implants for retaining overdenture prosthesis is considered an alternative treatment when standard treatment is not possible, since it presents high survival rates, acceptable marginal bone loss, and improvements in variables related to satisfaction and quality of life.
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Based on the results of this study, the use of a minimum 4 and 6 mini implants can be considered a satisfactory treatment option for rehabilitation of the mandibular and maxillary arches respectively with a complete overdenture.
Topics: Aged; Alveolar Bone Loss; Dental Implants; Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported; Dental Restoration Failure; Denture Design; Denture Retention; Denture, Complete; Denture, Overlay; Humans; Mandible; Maxilla; Mouth, Edentulous; Patient Satisfaction; Quality of Life; Rehabilitation
PubMed: 27888049
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2016.11.009 -
The Journal of Contemporary Dental... Nov 2021The purpose of this review is to compare randomized clinical trials evaluating the peri-implant tissue outcomes using different unsplinted attachment systems in two... (Review)
Review
AIM
The purpose of this review is to compare randomized clinical trials evaluating the peri-implant tissue outcomes using different unsplinted attachment systems in two implant-retained mandibular overdentures.
BACKGROUND
Literature lacks information on various unsplinted attachment systems and their effect on peri-implant tissue health. A focus question (as per PICOS) was set as follows: Does one particular unsplinted attachment system (I) compared with another (C) results in better peri-implant outcomes (O) in two implant-retained mandibular overdentures (P) using randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (S)? The literature search was conducted in the PubMed, MEDLINE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases between January 2011 and December 2021. The keywords used were "denture, overlay," "denture," "overlay" AND "dental prosthesis, implant supported," "dental implants," "dental implant abutment design" AND "jaw, edentulous," "mouth, edentulous" AND "mandible." Only RCTs on two implant-retained mandibular overdentures using unsplinted attachment systems measuring peri-implant tissue outcomes with minimum 1-year follow-up were selected. In total, 224 studies were identified in initial search, and 25 were shortlisted for full-text evaluation. Four studies were included for systematic review upon considering inclusion and exclusion criteria. The risk of bias was evaluated using Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2.0 (RoB 2.0).
REVIEW RESULTS
A total of 41 patients received ball attachments (in 3 studies), 36 patients received low-profile attachments (in 3 studies), 16 patients received magnet attachments (in 1 study), and 13 patients received telescopic attachments (in 1 study). All four studies used standard sized implants, however, differed in implant manufacturers. Two studies which compared ball attachments low-profile attachments revealed-similar peri-implant tissue health parameters but differed in crestal bone-level changes. One study compared ball with telescopic attachments and revealed similar results in crestal bone-level changes and all four peri-implant tissue health parameters. Single study compared magnets with low-profile attachments and shown lesser bone loss with magnet attachments. Single study was judged to have low risk of bias, single with some concerns, and remaining two to have high risk of bias.
CONCLUSION
Gingival index and bleeding index of the patients were not influenced by any of the unsplinted overdenture attachment (stud, magnet, telescopic) system. Inconclusive results found among the studies evaluated comparing crestal bone loss and plaque index.
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE
This review manuscript has simplified comparative analysis of different unsplinted attachment systems used in two implant mandibular overdentures to help clinicians choose correct system in such situation.
Topics: Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported; Denture Retention; Denture, Overlay; Humans; Jaw, Edentulous; Mandible; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 35343463
DOI: No ID Found -
The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry Jun 2022A systematic review of the effect of different overdenture attachments with different loading protocols on peri-implant health is lacking. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Effect of 2-implant mandibular overdenture with different attachments and loading protocols on peri-implant health and prosthetic complications: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM
A systematic review of the effect of different overdenture attachments with different loading protocols on peri-implant health is lacking.
PURPOSE
The purpose of this systematic review and network meta-analysis was to evaluate the effect of different overdenture attachments with delayed or immediately loaded 2-implant-retained mandibular overdentures on peri-implant tissue health.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
A comprehensive search of the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library was conducted to identify eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The outcomes were marginal bone loss, probing depth, plaque index, bleeding on probing, implant survival rate, and prosthetic complications. The Bayesian network meta-analysis accompanied by a random effect model and 95% credible intervals was calculated.
RESULTS
Sixteen RCT (n=599 participants receiving 1198 dental implants) were included. Five common overdenture attachment systems with delayed or immediate loading were compared. The difference in marginal bone loss and probing depth was not statistically significant when comparing different overdenture attachments with different loading protocols. The rank probability test showed that bar+ immediate loading ranked highest (63.8%) in terms of marginal bone loss, whereas ball+ delayed loading (73.3%) ranked highest in terms of probing depth. The implant survival rate was 100% for the LOCATOR+ delayed loading, resilient telescopic+ delayed loading, and magnet+ immediate loading; however, bar+ delayed loading, ball+ delayed loading, magnet+ delayed loading, LOCATOR+ immediate loading, ball+ immediate loading, and bar+ immediate loading had survival rates of 99.1%, 98.8%, 96.0%, 94.7%, 93.1%, and 91.2%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
All types of overdenture attachment with immediate loading or delayed loading had a similar effect on peri-implant health. Bar+ immediate loading was associated with the least marginal bone loss, whereas ball+ delayed loading showed the least probing depth.
Topics: Dental Implants; Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported; Denture, Overlay; Humans; Immediate Dental Implant Loading; Jaw, Edentulous; Mandible; Network Meta-Analysis; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 33546861
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.12.016 -
The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry May 2024Immediately loaded mandibular overdentures are clinically acceptable treatment options that have gained popularity because their use shortens the treatment duration.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Patient-reported outcome measures and prosthetic events in implant-supported mandibular overdenture patients after immediate versus delayed loading: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM
Immediately loaded mandibular overdentures are clinically acceptable treatment options that have gained popularity because their use shortens the treatment duration. However, whether the immediate loading of dental implants can match the prosthetic events, satisfaction, and quality of life of delayed loading is still unclear.
PURPOSE
The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the prosthetic events, satisfaction, and quality of life of immediate versus delayed loading implants in patients rehabilitated with mandibular overdentures.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement and was registered at The International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (CRD42021258187). Electronic searches were carried out by 2 independent reviewers in the PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases up to May 2021. Only randomized clinical trials and prospective studies with at least 10 participants that compared immediate versus delayed loading were selected. A meta-analysis was performed by using the RevMan 5 software program for complications and maintenance outcomes.
RESULTS
Seven articles were included in the qualitative analysis, and 4 were included in the quantitative analysis. The meta-analysis demonstrated no significant difference between immediate and delayed loading for prosthetic complications (RR=1.71; 95% CI=0.67-4.37; I=85%, P=.27) or maintenance (RR=1.92, 95% CI=0.44-8.28; I=94%, P=.38).
CONCLUSIONS
Although the prosthetic complications and maintenance were more likely to favor the delayed loading group, available evidence showed no statistical difference for prosthetic complications and maintenance between immediate loading and delayed loading in mandibular overdentures.
Topics: Humans; Denture, Overlay; Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported; Immediate Dental Implant Loading; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Mandible; Quality of Life; Patient Satisfaction
PubMed: 35501187
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.03.015 -
Dental and Medical Problems 2023The ball attachments and their O-rings used for the retention and stabilization of overdentures showed a decrease in retention as the number of cycles increased. This... (Review)
Review
The ball attachments and their O-rings used for the retention and stabilization of overdentures showed a decrease in retention as the number of cycles increased. This fact resulted in a decrease in the retention of the prosthesis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the fatigue resistance of ball attachments through a systematic review. An electronic search was performed using the Cochrane Library, LILACS, PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science databases. The search was conducted based on the PICOS framework. The inclusion criteria involved in the search comprised research articles written in English and published between the years 2000 and 2020. In the final selection, 18 articles were included in the review. Most of these studies performed the fatigue retention tests using parallel implants without angles. However, some studies used different angles to analyze the fatigue retention values. With the passage of time, the wear results in deformation and, as a consequence, a decrease in the retention of most attachments, leading to treatment failure. The main factor to be considered is the loss of retention of these components and their low durability. The loss of retention is due to large extent to the materials used to manufacture the attachments and O-rings, the size and angulation of the implants, and the length of the prosthesis. Future research is needed to further elucidate the reasons for the failure of the attachments.
Topics: Humans; Dental Implants; Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported; Denture Retention; Denture, Overlay
PubMed: 37023344
DOI: 10.17219/dmp/146719 -
The International Journal of... 2017Edentulous patients benefit significantly from implant-supported overdenture prostheses. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Edentulous patients benefit significantly from implant-supported overdenture prostheses. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of implant-supported overdentures (IODs) for edentulous patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The search was limited to studies written in English and included an electronic and manual search through MEDLINE (Ovid, 1946 to November 2015), Embase (Ovid, 1966 to November 2015), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (to November 2015), and PubMed (to November 2015). Two investigators extracted the data and assessed the studies independently. No meta-analysis was conducted due to the high heterogeneity within the literature.
RESULTS
Of the initial 583 selected articles, 10 studies involving 802 participants were included. Of these, 6 studies had a high risk of bias and the rest had an unclear risk of bias. Implant-supported prostheses were more cost-effective when compared to conventional dentures and fixed implant-supported prostheses. Overdentures supported by two implants and magnet attachment were reported as cost-effective.
CONCLUSION
Implant-supported overdentures are a cost-effective treatment for edentulous patients. More clinical studies with appropriate scientific vigor are required to further assess the cost-effectiveness of implant-supported overdentures.
Topics: Cost-Benefit Analysis; Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported; Denture, Overlay; Humans; Jaw, Edentulous
PubMed: 28697200
DOI: 10.11607/ijp.5023 -
Clinical Oral Implants Research Jan 2016This systematic review was performed to compare the survival of 1- vs. 2-implant overdentures (IODs) in the edentulous mandible. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
This systematic review was performed to compare the survival of 1- vs. 2-implant overdentures (IODs) in the edentulous mandible.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Manual and electronic database (PubMed, EMBASE and CENTRAL) searches were performed to identify scientific articles, published in English, reporting on mandibular IODs utilizing unsplinted attachments. Studies were included if they were prospective human studies reporting on two-piece microrough surface implants with a diameter ≥3 mm. Data were extracted by two independent investigators, and an overall inter-investigator kappa score was calculated. A meta-analysis was performed on the included comparative studies.
RESULTS
The search shortlisted 30 prospective studies for data extraction and statistical analysis. The included studies comprised of only two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing 1- vs. 2-IODs, and a further 28 prospective studies. The kappa score calculated was between 0.86 and 1 for the various parameters. One RCT favored 1-IODs (RD: 0.08, 95% CI: 0.01, 0.14) while the other favored 2-IODs (RD:-0.04, 95% CI: -0.27, 0.19). However, the overall random effects model did not reveal a significant risk difference (RD) for implant failure between the two interventions (I(2) = 36.6%, P = 0.209; RD: 0.05, 95% CI: -0.07, 0.18).
CONCLUSIONS
The results of this meta-analysis conclude that the postloading implant survival of 1-IODs is not significantly different from 2-IODs. However, the existing scientific evidence in the literature in terms of prospective comparative studies is scarce. Hence, before recommending the 1-IOD as a treatment modality, long-term observations are needed and a larger range of functional, prosthodontic, and patient-centered outcome measures should be considered.
Topics: Dental Implants; Dental Prosthesis Design; Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported; Dental Restoration Failure; Denture Retention; Denture, Complete, Lower; Denture, Overlay; Humans; Jaw, Edentulous; Mandible; Surface Properties
PubMed: 25350235
DOI: 10.1111/clr.12513 -
Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society 2022The purpose of this study is to evaluate the retention effectiveness of Molloplast B as a female attachment compared to O rings' in implant supported overdentures. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
AIM
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the retention effectiveness of Molloplast B as a female attachment compared to O rings' in implant supported overdentures.
SETTINGS AND DESIGN
This systematic review and meta-analysis was evaluated using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Sixteen female part models were divided into two groups: eight female parts made with O ring (Group A) and eight female parts made with Molloplast B (Group B). All of the models were soaked in artificial saliva for 24 h, then, their retention force was measured in Newton using a Universal mechanical testing machine, initially, after 500, after 1000, and after 1500 of loading and dislodging cycles.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED
: The statistical analysis was conducted by using one way ANOVA test and Bonferroni test. SPSS Software (SPSS, Version 27, IBM Co., Chicago, IL, USA).
RESULTS
After 1500 loading and dislodging cycles, Group B has the highest mean retention force (4.09), followed by Group A, which has a mean retention force of 3.73.
CONCLUSION
Molloplast B with a 2.7 mm diameter ball attachment lost the least amount of retention force after 1500 loading and dislodging cycles.
Topics: Female; Humans; Denture Retention; Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported; Dental Stress Analysis; Dental Implants; Denture, Overlay
PubMed: 36511057
DOI: 10.4103/jips.jips_43_22 -
Journal of Prosthodontics : Official... Oct 2023The aim of this systematic review was to compare treatment outcomes in terms of implant survival rate, marginal bone loss, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
The aim of this systematic review was to compare treatment outcomes in terms of implant survival rate, marginal bone loss, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) between narrow-diameter implants and regular-diameter implants (RDIs) for mandibular implant overdentures (MIOs).
METHODS
This study was based on the methodology adapted as per Cochrane. Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched for pertinent studies published by July 22, 2022. Outcome parameters included in this meta-analysis were implant survival rate, marginal bone loss, visual analogue scale score for patient satisfaction, and value of oral health impact profile.
RESULTS
A total of 782 non-duplicate articles and 83 clinical study registrations were identified from database and hand searches, of which 26 were eligible for full-text searches. Finally, 12 publications reporting on 8 independent studies were included in this review. In the meta-analysis, implant survival rate and marginal bone loss did not significantly differ between narrow-diameter implants and RDIs. Regarding RDIs, narrow-diameter implants were associated with significantly better outcomes in general patient satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life than RDIs for mandibular overdentures.
CONCLUSIONS
Narrow-diameter implants have competitive treatment outcomes compared to RDIs in terms of implant survival rate, marginal bone loss, and PROMs. [Correction added on July 21, 2023, after first online publication: The abbreviation RDIs was changed to PROMs in the preceding sentence.] Thus, narrow-diameter implants might be an alternative treatment option for MIOs in situations with limited alveolar bone volume.
Topics: Humans; Dental Implants; Quality of Life; Denture, Overlay; Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported; Treatment Outcome; Mandible; Alveolar Bone Loss
PubMed: 37365991
DOI: 10.1111/jopr.13726