-
The Lancet. Oncology Oct 2019Although international guidelines support the administration of hormone therapies with or without targeted therapies in postmenopausal women with... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis
Endocrine treatment versus chemotherapy in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, metastatic breast cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
Although international guidelines support the administration of hormone therapies with or without targeted therapies in postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer, upfront use of chemotherapy remains common even in the absence of visceral crisis. Because first-line or second-line treatments, or both, based on chemotherapy and on hormone therapy have been scarcely investigated in head-to-head randomised controlled trials, we aimed to compare these two different approaches.
METHODS
We did a systematic review and network meta-analysis with a systematic literature search on PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials, Web of Science, and online archives of the most relevant international oncology conferences. We included all phase 2 and 3 randomised controlled trials investigating chemotherapy with or without targeted therapies and hormone therapies with or without targeted therapies as first-line or second-line treatments, or both, in postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer, published between Jan 1, 2000, and Dec 31, 2017. Additional recently published randomised controlled trials relevant to the topic were also subsequently added. No language restrictions were adopted for our search. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was done to compare hazard ratios (HRs) for progression-free survival (the primary outcome), and to compare odds ratios (ORs) for the proportion of patients achieving an overall response (the secondary outcome). All treatments were compared to anastrozole and to palbociclib plus letrozole. This study is registered in the Open Science Framework online public database, registration DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/496VR.
FINDINGS
We identified 2689 published results and 140 studies (comprising 50 029 patients) were included in the analysis. Palbociclib plus letrozole (HR 0·42; 95% credible interval [CrI] 0·25-0·70), ribociclib plus letrozole (0·43; 0·24-0·77), abemaciclib plus anastrozole or letrozole (0·42; 0·23-0·76), palbociclib plus fulvestrant (0·37; 0·23-0·59), ribociclib plus fulvestrant (0·48; 0·31-0·74), abemaciclib plus fulvestrant (0·44; 0·28-0·70), everolimus plus exemestane (0·42; 0·28-0·67), and, in patients with a PIK3CA mutation, alpelisib plus fulvestrant (0·39; 0·22-0·66), and several chemotherapy-based regimens, including anthracycline and taxane-containing regimens, were associated with better progression-free survival than was anastrozole alone. No chemotherapy or hormone therapy regimen was significantly better than palbociclib plus letrozole for progression-free survival. Paclitaxel plus bevacizumab was the only clinically relevant regimen that was significantly better than palbociclib plus letrozole in terms of the proportion of patients achieving an overall response (OR 8·95; 95% CrI 1·03-76·92).
INTERPRETATION
In the first-line or second-line setting, CDK4/6 inhibitors plus hormone therapies are better than standard hormone therapies in terms of progression-free survival. Moreover, no chemotherapy regimen with or without targeted therapy is significantly better than CDK4/6 inhibitors plus hormone therapies in terms of progression-free survival. Our data support treatment guideline recommendations involving the new combinations of hormone therapies plus targeted therapies as first-line or second-line treatments, or in both settings, in women with hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer.
FUNDING
None.
Topics: Aminopyridines; Anastrozole; Androstadienes; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzimidazoles; Bevacizumab; Breast Neoplasms; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Everolimus; Female; Fulvestrant; Humans; Letrozole; Network Meta-Analysis; Paclitaxel; Piperazines; Postmenopause; Progression-Free Survival; Purines; Pyridines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Receptor, ErbB-2; Receptors, Estrogen; Receptors, Progesterone
PubMed: 31494037
DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30420-6 -
Cancer Cell International Sep 2023Paclitaxel is a natural anticancer compound with minimal toxicity, the capacity to stabilize microtubules, and high efficiency that has remained the standard of... (Review)
Review
Paclitaxel is a natural anticancer compound with minimal toxicity, the capacity to stabilize microtubules, and high efficiency that has remained the standard of treatment alongside platinum-based therapy as a remedy for a variety of different malignancies. In contrast, polyphenols such as flavonoids are also efficient antioxidant and anti-inflammatory and have now been shown to possess potent anticancer properties. Therefore, the synergistic effects of paclitaxel and flavonoids against cancer will be of interest. In this review, we use a Boolean query to comprehensively search the well-known Scopus database for literature research taking the advantage of paclitaxel and flavonoids simultaneously while treating various types of cancer. After retrieving and reviewing the intended investigations based on the input keywords, the anticancer mechanisms of flavonoids and paclitaxel and their synergistic effects on different targets raging from cell lines to animal models are discussed in terms of the corresponding involved signaling transduction. Most studies demonstrated that these signaling pathways will induce apoptotic / pro-apoptotic proteins, which in turn may activate several caspases leading to apoptosis. Finally, it can be concluded that the results of this review may be beneficial in serving as a theoretical foundation and reference for future studies of paclitaxel synthesis, anticancer processes, and clinical applications involving different clinical trials.
PubMed: 37743502
DOI: 10.1186/s12935-023-03052-z -
Cureus Oct 2023Pancreatic cancer is a malignant tumor with one of the worst prognosis. Its incidence has been on the rise in recent years. First-line and second-line treatments as well... (Review)
Review
Pancreatic cancer is a malignant tumor with one of the worst prognosis. Its incidence has been on the rise in recent years. First-line and second-line treatments as well as adjuvant therapies have been employed in clinical trials for pancreatic cancer along with traditional chemotherapy and radiotherapy that has been enhanced. The prognosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is still quite bad despite recent improvements in diagnostic and treatment methods. Since most patients are not candidates for treatment with a curative purpose, effective palliative care is crucial. For this systematic review, between December 25, 2022, and January 5, 2023, we searched PubMed, Medline, Cochrane, and Science Direct and discovered 225 relevant articles. The appropriateness of the literature abstracts for the pooled analysis was evaluated using different combinations of keywords such as pancreatic cancer, first- and second-line chemotherapy, palliative chemotherapy, gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel (GnP), FOLFIRINOX (FFX), and fluorouracil. Eight research studies with a total of 15,236 people, including systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs), were included. The only treatment of choice for patients without metastatic disease who have clinical staging that suggests resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) should be resection. This research examined how first- and second-line chemotherapeutic regimens (using different drug combinations) affected patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) or BRPC and how they responded in terms of overall survival (OS), tumor resectability, and progression-free interval. The review concludes by highlighting the results of these therapies. Notably, a growing body of research indicates that the two most popular first-line medication combinations GnP and FFX have similar results in RCTs and in real-world populations. Results of second-line therapy after first-line regime failure are still dismal, and there is still a great deal of doubt regarding the best course of action. More RCTs and real-world evidence studies that address current and innovative regimens, as well as the best order in which to administer them, are required, with a greater emphasis on targeted therapy with fewer side effects.
PubMed: 37937003
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.46630 -
Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology Oct 2023Taxanes in the treatment of cancer are associated with a significant incidence of hypersensitivity reactions, which may preclude their use in patients in need of first... (Review)
Review
Taxanes in the treatment of cancer are associated with a significant incidence of hypersensitivity reactions, which may preclude their use in patients in need of first line therapy. Drug desensitization induces transient immunological tolerance and has allowed the reintroduction of taxanes in highly allergic patients. Increase the knowledge of hypersensitivity reactions (HSR) during the administration of taxanes. A systematic review regarding the safety and efficacy of rapid drug desensitization (RDD) for taxanes HSR. The study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, was registered in PROSPERO(CRD42021242324) and a comprehensive search was conducted in Medline, Embase, Web of Science and Scopus databases. 25 studies encompassing 10 countries were identified and 976 patients with initial HSR to paclitaxel (n = 707) and docetaxel (n = 284), that underwent a total of 2,396 desensitizations. The most common symptoms were cutaneous (74.6%) with paclitaxel and respiratory (72.6%) with docetaxel. Severe initial hypersensitivity reactions including anaphylaxis occurred in 39.6% and 13% of paclitaxel and docetaxel cases respectively and during the first (87.4%) or second exposure (81.5%). Patients tolerated well RDD and breakthrough reactions (BTR) occurred in 32.2% of paclitaxel-treated patients and in 20.6% of docetaxel treated patients. Premedications included corticosteroids, antihistamines and leukotriene receptor antagonists. The most commonly used protocol was the BWH 3 bags 12 steps, all protocols showed a success rate between 95-100%, with no reported deaths. RDD is a safe and effective procedure in patients with HSR to taxanes and protocols should be standardized for wide range implementation.
PubMed: 37589840
DOI: 10.1007/s12016-023-08968-y -
Frontiers in Pharmacology 2023Doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity represents a prevalent adverse effect encountered in patients undergoing treatment with doxorubicin. To date, there has been no...
Doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity represents a prevalent adverse effect encountered in patients undergoing treatment with doxorubicin. To date, there has been no bibliometric study to summarize the field of doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity. In our study, we aim to determine the current status and frontiers of doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity by bibliometric analysis. The documents concerning doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity are obtained from the Web of Science Core Collection database (WOSCC), and VOSviewer 1.6.16, CiteSpace 5.1.3 and the WOSCC's literature analysis wire were used to conduct the bibliometric analysis. In total, 7,021 publications were encompassed, which are produced by 37,152 authors and 6,659 organizations, 1,323 journals, and 101 countries/regions. The most productive author, institution, country and journal were Bonnie Ky with 35 publications, University of Texas with 190 documents, the United States with 1,912 publications, and with 120 documents. The first high-cited article was published in the NEJM with 8,134 citations authored by DJ Slamon et al., in 2001. For keyword analysis, there are four clusters depicted in distinct directions. The keywords in the red cluster are oxidative stress, apoptosis, and cardiomyopathy. The keywords in the green cluster are cardiotoxicity, heart failure, and anthracycline. The keywords in the blue cluster are chemotherapy, trastuzumab, and paclitaxel. The keywords in the purple cluster are doxorubicin, adriamycin, and cancer. Most of the documents were derived from the United States, China and Italy (4,080/7,021, 58.1%). The number of studies from other countries should be increased. In conclusion, the main research hotspots and frontiers in the field of doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity include the role of doxorubicin in cardiotoxicity, the mechanisms underlying doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity, and the development of treatment strategies for doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity. More studies are needed to explore the mechanisms and treatment of doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity.
PubMed: 38026961
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1255158 -
Cancer Treatment Reviews Dec 2015Taxanes, including paclitaxel and docetaxel, are indispensable for treatment of cancer. Development of toxicity frequently necessitates dose reduction or discontinuation... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Taxanes, including paclitaxel and docetaxel, are indispensable for treatment of cancer. Development of toxicity frequently necessitates dose reduction or discontinuation of therapy, despite clinical response.
OBJECTIVE
Pharmacogenetic studies were reviewed for identification of genetic variants possibly underlying individual susceptibility to adverse events.
METHOD
We conducted a systematic search in Pubmed and Embase for pharmacogenetic reports with focus on commonly reported taxane-related gastrointestinal, hematological and neurological toxicities in adult patients with solid tumors. The findings from a total of 51 eligible studies are presented in a comprehensive way.
RESULTS
Most frequently investigated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were located in genes encoding proteins affecting pharmacokinetics, such as drug transporters and genes of the cytochrome P450 family. Inconclusive data for risk of toxicity as well as for effects on drug exposure were reported on variants in ABCB1, CYP3A4, CYP3A5 and, for paclitaxel, CYP2C8. Interest is also dedicated towards genes involved in pharmacodynamics, such as detoxification of reactive oxygen species, DNA repair, neuronal processes and microtubule function. Recent studies include variants in TUBB2A, EPHA5 and EPHA6 for a possible association with neurotoxicity. Variations in methodological approach, sample size, study design, treatment schedule and end-point of toxicity affect consistency of results.
CONCLUSION
This review illustrates the complexity to well design pharmacogenetic studies for validation of SNPs that may clarify differences in taxane-induced toxicities among individuals. Novel genes encoding cellular targets of taxanes deserve further analysis by means of robust patient cohorts and definition of objective end-points.
Topics: ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B; Antineoplastic Agents; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C8; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A; Docetaxel; Gastrointestinal Diseases; Hematologic Diseases; Humans; Neurotoxicity Syndromes; Paclitaxel; Pharmacogenetics; Polymorphism, Genetic; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Receptor, EphA5; Receptor, EphA6; Taxoids; Tubulin
PubMed: 26585358
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2015.10.010 -
Surgical Oncology Sep 2022Breast cancer (BC) is a common malignant tumor. Apatinib in combination with other treatments has been used for BC; however, its safety and efficacy are not well-known.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Breast cancer (BC) is a common malignant tumor. Apatinib in combination with other treatments has been used for BC; however, its safety and efficacy are not well-known. Therefore, this meta-analysis was performed to assess the efficacy and safety of apatinib in the treatment of BC.
METHODS
Studies comparing the effects of apatinib-based therapy versus control among BC patients were included. On January 21, 2022, a systematic search was performed in 9 databases. The risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to estimate efficacy and safety. The I square value (I) was used to assess heterogeneity. A leave-one-out sensitivity analysis was also conducted. Publication bias was assessed by funnel plots and Egger's and Begg's tests.
RESULTS
A total of 31 studies including 2,258 BC patients were included. The results showed that apatinib group had a significant improvement in disease control rate (DCR, RR = 1.43, 95% CI = 1.35-1.52, I = 43.8%) and objective response rate (ORR, RR = 1.79, 95% CI = 1.51-2.13, I = 61.8%) compared to the control group. Except for hemorrhage, hypertension, and hand-foot syndrome, the adverse events were similar between apatinib group and control group. Subgroup analyses found statistically significant differences in DCR in all subgroups except for apatinib combined with radiation therapy and with paclitaxel liposome plus S1. For ORR, there were statistically significant differences in all subgroups except for the radiation therapy, and apatinib monotherapy subgroups.
CONCLUSIONS
Our study shown apatinib showed good efficacy and acceptable safety in the treatment of BC patients. More high-quality randomized controlled trials from different regions and countries are needed to confirm our findings.
Topics: Breast Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Liposomes; Paclitaxel; Pyridines; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 35930900
DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2022.101818 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2023The combination of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-PTX)/paclitaxel (PTX) with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has demonstrated significant efficacy in... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
The combination of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-PTX)/paclitaxel (PTX) with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has demonstrated significant efficacy in cancer patients. However, the safety of these combination regimens remains conflicting in former researches. Therefore, in order to address this issue, we performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) to evaluate and compare the safety profile.
METHODS
We performed a systematic review by searching randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Web of Science up to August 15, 2022. The primary outcomes were all-grade (grade 1-5) and high-grade (grade 3-5) immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Secondary outcomes were all-grade (grade 1-5) and high-grade (grade 3-5) irAEs of subgroups of ICIs.
RESULTS
There were 22 RCTs included in the NMA, involving a total of 15 963 patients diagnosed with any type of cancer. ICIs+nab-PTX was associated with a noticeably decreased risk of grade 3-5 pneumonitis (odds ratio [OR]=0.28, 95% credible interval [CrI]: 0.09,0.90) compared to ICI monotherapy; ICIs+PTX showed a lower risk of grade 1-5 hyperthyroidism (OR=0.46, 95% CrI: 0.22-0.96) and grade 1-5 hypothyroidism (OR=0.49, 95% CrI: 0.26-0.93) than ICIs. Compared with PD-1, PD-1+PTX was associated with a statistically significantly lower risk of grade 1-5 pneumonitis (OR=0.32, 95% CrI: 0.11-0.92). PD-L1 resulted in a noticeably lower risk of grade 1-5 hypothyroidism (OR=0.34, 95% CrI: 0.12-1.00) than PD-L1+PTX. Nearly all treatment regimens containing ICIs demonstrated significantly higher risks of irAEs compared to the standard chemotherapy groups.
CONCLUSION
Nab-PTX/PTX+ICIs demonstrated an approach leading to decreased risk of irAEs compared with ICI monotherapy. This finding supports that ICIs+nab-PTX/PTX may be a safer treatment strategy. Moreover, we also found that the combination regimens containing ICIs had a higher risk of irAEs than standard chemotherapy. Additionally, ICIs+nab-PTX demonstrated a decreased risk of irAEs compared to ICIs+PTX. PD-1 inhibitors were associated with a higher risk of irAEs than PD-L1 inhibitors.
Topics: Humans; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; B7-H1 Antigen; Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor; Network Meta-Analysis; Neoplasms; Paclitaxel; Hypothyroidism; Pneumonia
PubMed: 37520574
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1175809 -
Breast Cancer (Tokyo, Japan) Mar 2017Ixabepilone is now a Food and Drug Administration-approved therapeutic option for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) whose disease has progressed despite prior... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Ixabepilone is now a Food and Drug Administration-approved therapeutic option for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) whose disease has progressed despite prior anthracycline and taxane therapy. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of ixabepilone for treating metastatic breast cancer.
METHODS
A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted. Randomized controlled studies applying ixabepilone for treating MBC were included. The primary outcome was Overall Survival (OS). The authors of primary articles were contacted and methodological quality was evaluated. Subgroups were drawn based on intervention measures; heterogeneity and bias were discussed.
RESULTS
Eight studies with 5247 patients were included. Compared with a weekly schedule, a triweekly schedule of ixabepilone was better at improving overall response rate (ORR), while there were no differences in improving OS and progression-free survival (PFS). Ixabepilone plus capecitabine was superior to capecitabine monotherapy in improving OS, PFS and ORR. Paclitaxel was more effective than ixabepilone in terms of OS and PFS. There was no difference in the improvement of ORR, clinical benefit rate (CBR) and disease control rate (DCR) between ixabepilone and eribulin.
CONCLUSIONS
Current evidence suggests that a triweekly schedule of ixabepilone is more effective than weekly dosing in improving ORR. Use of ixabepilone in combination with capecitabine possesses superior clinical efficacy to the use of capecitabine alone. Paclitaxel was more effective than ixabepilone in terms of OS and PFS. The efficacy and safety between ixabepilone and eribulin were identical.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Breast Neoplasms; Capecitabine; Drug Administration Schedule; Epothilones; Female; Furans; Humans; Ketones; Paclitaxel; Survival Analysis; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 27491426
DOI: 10.1007/s12282-016-0717-0 -
BMC Cancer Jul 2021Although various clinical trials and real-life studies have tried to explore the value of nab-paclitaxel mono-chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC), the safety... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Although various clinical trials and real-life studies have tried to explore the value of nab-paclitaxel mono-chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC), the safety and efficacy of nab-paclitaxel remain unclear which need to be systematically evaluated.
METHODS
Electronic searches for prospective clinical trials evaluating nab-paclitaxel monotherapy for MBC were performed. Requisite data were extracted, integrated and analysed from the included studies according to the different study designs using systematic review and meta-analysis. Meta-regression and subgroup analysis were further performed to explore the potential risk factors affecting each individual outcome of interest following nab-paclitaxel monotherapy.
RESULTS
Twenty-two studies with 3287 MBC patients were included. A total of 1685 MBC patients received nab-paclitaxel as first-line therapy, 640 patients as further-line therapy, and 962 patients as mixed-line therapy. A total of 1966 MBC patients (60.40%) received nab-paclitaxel weekly, 1190 patients (36.56%) received nab-paclitaxel triweekly and 99 patients (3.04%) received nab-paclitaxel biweekly. The overall incidence rates of all-grade neutropenia, leukopenia, peripheral sensory neuropathy, and fatigue were 52% (95% CI, 38-66%, I = 98.97%), 58% (95% CI, 43-73%, I = 97.72%), 58% (95% CI, 48-68%, I = 97.17%), and 49% (95% CI, 41-56%, I = 94.39%), respectively. The overall response rate (ORR) was 40% (95% CI, 35-45%, I = 98.97%), and the clinical benefit rate (CBR) was 66% (95% CI, 59-73%, I = 98.97%) following nab-paclitaxel monotherapy. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.64 months (95% CI, 6.89-8.40 months, I = 92.3%), and the median overall survival (OS) was 24.51 months (95% CI, 21.25-27.78 months, I = 92.7%). Treatment line, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2(Her-2)-negative status and dosage were found to be sources of heterogeneity among the included studies. According to the meta-regression and subgroup analysis, grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred less frequently in Her-2-negative patients than in the entire population (P = 0.046). Patients who received first-line nab-paclitaxel monotherapy showed a higher ORR (P = 0.006) and longer PFS (P = 0.045). Efficacy outcomes were not affected by the administration schedule. However, within the same schedule, patients appeared to have a superior ORR (P = 0.044) and longer PFS (P = 0.03) with an increasing dosage of nab-paclitaxel administered.
CONCLUSIONS
The benefits brought by nab-paclitaxel mono-chemotherapy in the treatment of MBC are considerable while the harm is generally manageable. Further study and validation are needed to figure out the roles which the dosage, schedule and other factors play actually in nab-paclitaxel chemotherapy.
Topics: Albumins; Breast Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Neoplasm Metastasis; Paclitaxel; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 34275458
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08441-z