-
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Feb 2016Uveitis is a term used to describe a heterogeneous group of intraocular inflammatory diseases of the anterior, intermediate, and posterior uveal tract (iris, ciliary... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Uveitis is a term used to describe a heterogeneous group of intraocular inflammatory diseases of the anterior, intermediate, and posterior uveal tract (iris, ciliary body, choroid). Uveitis is the fifth most common cause of vision loss in high-income countries, accounting for 5% to 20% of legal blindness, with the highest incidence of disease in the working-age population.Corticosteroids are the mainstay of acute treatment for all anatomical subtypes of non-infectious uveitis and can be administered orally, topically with drops or ointments, by periocular (around the eye) or intravitreal (inside the eye) injection, or by surgical implantation.
OBJECTIVES
To determine the efficacy and safety of steroid implants in people with chronic non-infectious posterior uveitis, intermediate uveitis, and panuveitis.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched CENTRAL (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register) (Issue 10, 2015), Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid MEDLINE In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE Daily, Ovid OLDMEDLINE (January 1946 to November 2015), EMBASE (January 1980 to November 2015), PubMed (1948 to November 2015), Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature Database (LILACS) (1982 to November 2015), the metaRegister of Controlled Trials (mRCT) (www.controlled-trials.com) (last searched 15 April 2013), ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov), and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (www.who.int/ictrp/search/en). We did not use any date or language restrictions in the electronic search for studies. We last searched the electronic databases on 6 November 2015.We also searched reference lists of included study reports, citation databases, and abstracts and clinical study presentations from professional meetings.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomized controlled trials comparing either fluocinolone acetonide (FA) or dexamethasone intravitreal implants with standard-of-care therapy with at least six months of follow-up after treatment. We included studies that enrolled participants of all ages who had chronic non-infectious posterior uveitis, intermediate uveitis, or panuveitis with vision that was better than hand-motion.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently reviewed studies for inclusion. Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias for each study.
MAIN RESULTS
We included data from two studies (619 eyes of 401 participants) that compared FA implants with standard-of-care therapy. Both studies used similar standard-of-care therapy that included administration of prednisolone and, if needed, immunosuppressive agents. The studies included participants from Australia, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Portugal, Saudi Arabia, Spain, Switzerland, Turkey, the United Kingdom, and the United States. We assessed both studies at high risk of performance and detection bias.Only one study reported our primary outcome, recurrence of uveitis at any point during the study through 24 months. The evidence, judged as moderate-quality, showed that a FA implant probably prevents recurrence of uveitis compared with standard-of-care therapy (risk ratio (RR) 0.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.14 to 0.59; 132 eyes). Both studies reported safety outcomes, and moderate-quality evidence showed increased risks of needing cataract surgery (RR 2.98, 95% CI 2.33 to 3.79; 371 eyes) and surgery to lower intraocular pressure (RR 7.48, 95% CI 3.94 to 14.19; 599 eyes) in the implant group compared with standard-of-care therapy through two years of follow-up. No studies compared dexamethasone implants with standard-of-care therapy.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
After considering both benefits and harms reported from two studies in which corticosteroids implants were compared with standard-of-care therapy, we are unable to conclude that the implants are superior to traditional systemic therapy for the treatment of non-infectious uveitis. These studies exhibited heterogeneity in design and outcomes that measured efficacy. Pooled findings regarding safety outcomes suggest increased risks of post-implant surgery for cataract and high intraocular pressure compared with standard-of-care therapy.
Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Adult; Chronic Disease; Drug Implants; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Prednisolone; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recurrence; Standard of Care; Uveitis
PubMed: 26866343
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010469.pub2 -
Journal of the European Academy of... Mar 2024
-
Current Opinion in Rheumatology Jan 2023Emerging data suggest that regulatory T-cells (Treg) alterations play a major role in systemic vasculitis pathophysiology. We performed a systematic review of recent...
PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW
Emerging data suggest that regulatory T-cells (Treg) alterations play a major role in systemic vasculitis pathophysiology. We performed a systematic review of recent advances in the role of Treg and interleukin (IL)-10 in the pathogenesis and treatment of systemic vasculitis, including giant cell arteritis (GCA), Takayasu arteritis, Behçet's disease, antineutrophil cytoplasm antibodies (ANCA) associated vasculitis (AAV), and cryoglobulinemia associated vasculitis.
RECENT FINDINGS
Emerging data suggest that Treg deficiencies are disease-specific, affecting distinct pathways in distinct vasculitides. Decreased peripheral blood frequencies of Treg are described in all vasculitis when compared to healthy donors. Altered Treg functions are reported in GCA, Takayasu arteritis, AAV, and Behçet's disease with different mechanisms proposed. Treatment with biologics, and sometimes other immunosuppressants, may restore Treg frequencies and/or immune activity with significant differences in active disease or disease in remission in several systemic vasculitis. IL-10 is elevated in GCA, AAV, cryoglobulinemia associated vasculitis. In Behçet's disease, IL-10 is decreased in peripheral blood and elevated in saliva. In Takayasu arteritis, IL-10 levels were essentially elevated in patients' vessel wall. Several new therapeutic approaches targeting Treg and Il-10 (low dose IL-2, CAR Treg…) are developed to treat patients with systemic vasculitis.
SUMMARY
Treg and IL-10 play a central role in the regulation of inflammation in vasculitis and new targeting approaches are emerging.
Topics: Humans; T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory; Interleukin-10; Behcet Syndrome; Giant Cell Arteritis; Takayasu Arteritis; Systemic Vasculitis; Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis
PubMed: 36508306
DOI: 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000915 -
Health Technology Assessment... Nov 2017Non-infectious intermediate uveitis, posterior uveitis and panuveitis are a heterogeneous group of inflammatory eye disorders. Management includes local and systemic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Non-infectious intermediate uveitis, posterior uveitis and panuveitis are a heterogeneous group of inflammatory eye disorders. Management includes local and systemic corticosteroids, immunosuppressants and biological drugs.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of subcutaneous adalimumab (Humira; AbbVie Ltd, Maidenhead, UK) and a dexamethasone intravitreal implant (Ozurdex; Allergan Ltd, Marlow, UK) in adults with non-infectious intermediate uveitis, posterior uveitis or panuveitis.
DATA SOURCES
Electronic databases and clinical trials registries including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects and the World Health Organization's International Clinical Trials Registry Platform were searched to June 2016, with an update search carried out in October 2016.
REVIEW METHODS
Review methods followed published guidelines. A Markov model was developed to assess the cost-effectiveness of dexamethasone and adalimumab, each compared with current practice, from a NHS and Personal Social Services (PSS) perspective over a lifetime horizon, parameterised with published evidence. Costs and benefits were discounted at 3.5%. Substantial sensitivity analyses were undertaken.
RESULTS
Of the 134 full-text articles screened, three studies (four articles) were included in the clinical effectiveness review. Two randomised controlled trials (RCTs) [VISUAL I (active uveitis) and VISUAL II (inactive uveitis)] compared adalimumab with placebo, with limited standard care also provided in both arms. Time to treatment failure (reduced visual acuity, intraocular inflammation, new vascular lesions) was longer in the adalimumab group than in the placebo group, with a hazard ratio of 0.50 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.36 to 0.70; < 0.001] in the VISUAL I trial and 0.57 (95% CI 0.39 to 0.84; = 0.004) in the VISUAL II trial. The adalimumab group showed a significantly greater improvement than the placebo group in the 25-item Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-25) composite score in the VISUAL I trial (mean difference 4.20; = 0.010) but not the VISUAL II trial (mean difference 2.12; = 0.16). Some systemic adverse effects occurred more frequently with adalimumab than with placebo. One RCT [HURON (active uveitis)] compared a single 0.7-mg dexamethasone implant against a sham procedure, with limited standard care also provided in both arms. Dexamethasone provided significant benefits over the sham procedure at 8 and 26 weeks in the percentage of patients with a vitreous haze score of zero ( < 0.014), the mean best corrected visual acuity improvement ( ≤ 0.002) and the percentage of patients with a ≥ 5-point improvement in VFQ-25 score ( < 0.05). Raised intraocular pressure and cataracts occurred more frequently with dexamethasone than with the sham procedure. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for one dexamethasone implant in one eye for a combination of patients with unilateral and bilateral uveitis compared with limited current practice, as per the HURON trial, was estimated to be £19,509 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. The ICER of adalimumab for patients with mainly bilateral uveitis compared with limited current practice, as per the VISUAL trials, was estimated to be £94,523 and £317,547 per QALY gained in active and inactive uveitis respectively. Sensitivity analyses suggested that the rate of blindness has the biggest impact on the model results. The interventions may be more cost-effective in populations in which there is a greater risk of blindness.
LIMITATIONS
The clinical trials did not fully reflect clinical practice. Thirteen additional studies of clinically relevant comparator treatments were identified; however, network meta-analysis was not feasible. The model results are highly uncertain because of the limited evidence base.
CONCLUSIONS
Two RCTs of systemic adalimumab and one RCT of a unilateral, single dexamethasone implant showed significant benefits over placebo or a sham procedure. The ICERs for adalimumab were estimated to be above generally accepted thresholds for cost-effectiveness. The cost-effectiveness of dexamethasone was estimated to fall below standard thresholds. However, there is substantial uncertainty around the model assumptions. In future work, primary research should compare dexamethasone and adalimumab with current treatments over the long term and in important subgroups and consider how short-term improvements relate to long-term effects on vision.
STUDY REGISTRATION
This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42016041799.
FUNDING
The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.
Topics: Adalimumab; Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Dexamethasone; Humans; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Technology Assessment, Biomedical; Uveitis, Intermediate; Uveitis, Posterior
PubMed: 29183563
DOI: 10.3310/hta21680 -
Annales de Dermatologie Et de... Dec 2016Answering the question « what's new in internal medecine in 2016? » is very challenging. We used 3 methods of article selection to reduce the selection bias: 3... (Review)
Review
Answering the question « what's new in internal medecine in 2016? » is very challenging. We used 3 methods of article selection to reduce the selection bias: 3 authors, a systematic review of the articles discussed in the weekly bibliographic meeting of our unit (Dermatology department, Saint-Louis Hospital, Paris, France) and a selection of the best articles by several internal medecine practitioners in Paris. Eleven « hot topics » were analyzed: i/lowering cholesterol level but not blood blessure has a significant impact on cardiovascular morbi-mortality in cardiovascular intermediate risk patients; ii/the « treat to treat target » is efficient in psoriatic arthritis; iii/ a genotype/ phenotype correlation favors the separation of ileal Crohn's disease, colonic Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis; iv/ tocilizumab treatment (anti-IL-6 monoclonal antibody ) is very efficient in giant cell arteritis and slightly efficient in systemic sclerosis; v/ combination therapy using methotrexate plus steroids compared with steroids alone becomes the « gold standard » treatment for juvenile dermatomyositis; vi/ dupilumab treatment (antibody blocking IL-4 and IL-13 receptors) is not only efficient in atopic dermatitis but also in asthma; vii/ think of eosinophilic oesophagitis in a patient with atopic dermatitis and dypshagia or food impaction; viii/ genetic A2 protein dysfunction induces NF-kB hyperactivation and an autoinflammatory disorder with features similar to Behcet's disease; ix/ no new biotherapies have shown high efficacy in systemic lupus erythematosus; x/ nanoparticles loaded with autoantigens induce Tregs and Bregs and may be a promising therapeutic option to treat auto-immune disease in the future; xi/ ipilimumab treatment (anti-CTLA4 antibody, immune checkpoint inhibitor) may induce complete remission in acute myeloid leukemia patients relapsing after haematological stem cell transplantation. Year 2016 is full of great discoveries in internal medicine keeping the dermatologist brain fully open minded.
Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antihypertensive Agents; Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Asthma; Autoimmune Diseases; Behcet Syndrome; Cardiovascular Diseases; Humans; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases; Internal Medicine; Ipilimumab; Skin Diseases
PubMed: 29429506
DOI: 10.1016/S0151-9638(18)30046-2 -
Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation :... Apr 2022Tubulointerstitial nephritis and uveitis (TINU) syndrome is defined as the occurrence of tubulointerstitial nephritis (TIN) and uveitis in the absence of other systemic...
BACKGROUND
Tubulointerstitial nephritis and uveitis (TINU) syndrome is defined as the occurrence of tubulointerstitial nephritis (TIN) and uveitis in the absence of other systemic diseases. The most comprehensive review on this condition was published in 2001.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review of the literature for cases of TINU syndrome. MEDLINE and Embase databases were screened. Full-length articles or letters reporting cases with both TIN and uveitis were selected. We investigated differences between males and females and paediatric and adult cases. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify potential risk factors for chronic kidney disease (CKD) development.
RESULTS
A total of 233 articles reporting 592 TINU cases were retained for the analysis. The median age of the included subjects was 17 years (interquartile range 13-46) with a female predominance (65%). Uveitis most frequently (52%) followed renal disease and was mostly anterior (65%) and bilateral (88%). Children tended to have more ocular relapses, while they were slightly less likely than adults to suffer from acute kidney injury and to develop CKD. Adult age as well as posterior or panuveitis were associated with an increased risk of developing CKD.
CONCLUSIONS
TINU affects both children and adults, with some differences between these two categories. Adult age and the presence of a posterior uveitis or panuveitis appear to be associated with the development of CKD.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Child; Female; Humans; Male; Nephritis, Interstitial; Panuveitis; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Uveitis
PubMed: 33561271
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfab030 -
Survey of Ophthalmology 2022Cytomegalovirus (CMV) anterior uveitis is the most common form of ocular manifestation of CMV in immunocompetent individuals. The difficulty in diagnosing CMV anterior... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) anterior uveitis is the most common form of ocular manifestation of CMV in immunocompetent individuals. The difficulty in diagnosing CMV anterior uveitis may delay adequate treatment and affect outcomes. We sought to review systemically the overall clinical characteristics and compare treatment outcomes in CMV anterior uveitis and endotheliitis. A literature search was performed, and studies describing clinical characteristics, treatment regimens, and outcomes that included more than 5 treated eyes were included. In these 23 studies, acute CMV anterior uveitis commonly presented with high intraocular pressure (95.31%, 95% CI 90.45-98.60) and mild anterior chamber inflammation (cells >2+ = 3.18%, 95% CI 0.21-0.54). About two-thirds of CMV endotheliitis cases presented with high intraocular pressure and coin-shaped corneal lesions. Acute CMV anterior uveitis showed good clinical response to topical 0.15% ganciclovir (GCV) gel or oral valganciclovir (VGCV) (90%, 95% CI 74-100% and 95%, 95% CI 88-100%, respectively). For chronic CMV anterior uveitis, both topical GCV and oral VGCV yielded comparable results. Topical 0.5-2% GCV or a combination of topical and oral VGCV for CMV endotheliitis both resulted in good clinical response. Recurrence of inflammation was common after cessation of maintenance therapy. Overall, topical GCV resulted in an optimal outcome for CMV anterior uveitis. Escalated concentration and frequency of usage are needed for chronic CMV anterior uveitis and endotheliitis. Adequate induction and maintenance phases of anti-CMV treatment seem necessary to prevent recurrences.
Topics: Antiviral Agents; Aqueous Humor; Cytomegalovirus; Cytomegalovirus Infections; DNA, Viral; Eye Infections, Viral; Ganciclovir; Glaucoma; Humans; Inflammation; Treatment Outcome; Uveitis, Anterior; Valganciclovir
PubMed: 34954093
DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2021.12.006 -
Ophthalmology May 2024Sympathetic ophthalmia (SO) is a sight-threatening granulomatous panuveitis caused by a sensitizing event. Primary enucleation or primary evisceration, versus primary... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
TOPIC
Sympathetic ophthalmia (SO) is a sight-threatening granulomatous panuveitis caused by a sensitizing event. Primary enucleation or primary evisceration, versus primary repair, as a risk management strategy after open-globe injury (OGI) remains controversial.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE
This systematic review was conducted to report the incidence of SO after primary repair compared with that of after primary enucleation or primary evisceration. This enabled the reporting of an estimated number needed to treat.
METHODS
Five journal databases were searched. This review was registered with International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (identifier, CRD42021262616). Searches were carried out on June 29, 2021, and were updated on December 10, 2022. Prospective or retrospective studies that reported outcomes (including SO or lack of SO) in a patient population who underwent either primary repair and primary enucleation or primary evisceration were included. A systematic review and meta-analysis were carried out in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Random effects modelling was used to estimate pooled SO rates and absolute risk reduction (ARR).
RESULTS
Eight studies reporting SO as an outcome were included in total. The included studies contained 7500 patients and 7635 OGIs. In total, 7620 OGIs met the criteria for inclusion in this analysis; SO developed in 21 patients with OGI. When all included studies were pooled, the estimated SO rate was 0.12% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.00%-0.25%) after OGI. Of 779 patients who underwent primary enucleation or primary evisceration, no SO cases were reported, resulting in a pooled SO estimate of 0.05% (95% CI, 0.00%-0.21%). For primary repair, the pooled estimate of SO rate was 0.15% (95% CI, 0.00%-0.33%). The ARR using a random effects model was -0.0010 (in favour of eye removal; 95% CI, -0.0031 [in favor of eye removal] to 0.0011 [in favor of primary repair]). Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations analysis highlighted a low certainty of evidence because the included studies were observational, and a risk of bias resulted from missing data.
DISCUSSION
Based on the available data, no evidence exists that primary enucleation or primary evisceration reduce the risk of secondary SO.
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)
Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Topics: Humans; Ophthalmia, Sympathetic; Retrospective Studies; Eye Enucleation; Eye Injuries; Eye Evisceration
PubMed: 38086434
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2023.12.006 -
Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology Sep 2022The assessment of quality of life (QoL) in Behçet's disease (BD) patients has been a surrogate of disease outcomes, but a wider impact on the patient's lifestyle has... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
The assessment of quality of life (QoL) in Behçet's disease (BD) patients has been a surrogate of disease outcomes, but a wider impact on the patient's lifestyle has not been considered. This systematic review aims to provide an overview of the existing tools specifically adopted to explore the QoL in BD patients.
METHODS
A systematic literature review was conducted using 2 electronic databases, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A combination of BD and QoL-related search terms were used. All articles were screened by 3 independent reviewers for title, abstract and full text level. Studies investigating QoL in BD patients were included.
RESULTS
64 papers of 497 records were retained. Data about 7,449 patients with a BD diagnosis and QoL evaluation were collected. 47 different tools to evaluate QoL were detected. The mean number of tools adopted in each study was 2.14±1.34. General QoL and psychological and social impact were investigated in 68.75% and 54.69% respectively. The correlation with disease activity was investigated in 71.86%.
CONCLUSIONS
The assessment of QoL in BD patients may provide a fundamental measurement for health to evaluate the outcome of interventions for BD patients. The adoption of a single validated QoL tool, developed including the BD patient's perspective, may provide an accurate and effective assessment, ensure the comparison within different cohorts, and set standardised values to define QoL level in BD patients.
Topics: Behcet Syndrome; Humans; Quality of Life
PubMed: 36106544
DOI: 10.55563/clinexprheumatol/sian1b -
Journal of Gastroenterology and... Apr 2022Behcet's disease is a systemic vasculitis that can involve gastrointestinal tract. This is a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the efficacy and safety of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND AND AIM
Behcet's disease is a systemic vasculitis that can involve gastrointestinal tract. This is a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the efficacy and safety of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents in treating patients with intestinal Behcet's disease.
METHODS
We conducted searches on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane. Data from eligible studies were used to calculate the pooled estimate of proportions of clinical remission, mucosal healing at Months 3, 6, 12, and 24 as well as the pooled incidence of adverse drug reactions. And subgroup analysis based on the specific type of anti-TNF agents was performed.
RESULTS
Of the 828 studies initially identified, 13 were included finally, all of which were single-arm cohort studies. The pooled proportions of clinical remission at Months 3, 6, 12, and 24 were 0.61 (95%CI 0.48-0.78), 0.51 (95%CI 0.40-0.66), 0.57 (95%CI 0.48-0.67), and 0.38 (95%CI 0.16-0.88), respectively. The pooled proportions of mucosal healing at Months 3, 6, 12, and 24 were 0.66 (95%CI 0.50-0.86), 0.82 (95%CI 0.48-0.98), 0.65 (95%CI 0.51-0.81), and 0.69 (95%CI 0.39-1.00), respectively. The pooled estimate of proportion of overall adverse drug reactions for infliximab was 0.22 (95%CI 0.07-0.69).
CONCLUSIONS
Anti-TNF agents, including infliximab and adalimumab, were an efficient therapy for intestinal Behcet's disease. The safety of anti-TNF agents used in the treatment of intestinal Behcet's disease was acceptable.
Topics: Adalimumab; Behcet Syndrome; Humans; Infliximab; Treatment Outcome; Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha
PubMed: 34894004
DOI: 10.1111/jgh.15754