-
Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) Aug 2022: Pelvic nonunion and malunion have been documented as rare complications in pelvic fractures and literature describing these topics is severely limited. Articles... (Review)
Review
: Pelvic nonunion and malunion have been documented as rare complications in pelvic fractures and literature describing these topics is severely limited. Articles dedicated solely to pelvic malunion are nearly nonexistent. We conducted a literature search with the goal of providing a summary of the definition, causes, treatment strategies, and outcomes of pelvic malunion correction. : An initial review of the literature was performed using the PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews databases. Search terms used were "malunion" AND "pelvic" OR "pelvis". Duplicate articles, non-English language articles without translations available and non-human subject studies were excluded. : Eleven original publications were found describing experiences with pelvic malunion. Seven of the articles were exclusively dedicated to the topic of pelvic fracture malunion, and only two reported on a series of patients treated for malunion with variably staged procedures. Most reports define pelvic pain as the main indication for surgical correction, along with gait disturbance, standing or sitting imbalance, and urinary or sexual dysfunction. Radiographically, vertical displacement of one to two centimeters and rotation of the hemipelvis of fifteen degrees or more have been described in defining malunion. No treatment algorithms exist, and each patient is treated with a unique work-up and operative plan due to the complexity of the problem. Only one series reported a patient satisfaction rate of 75% following malunion treatment. Conclusions: Pelvic malunion is a rare complication of pelvic ring injury and is seldom discussed in the literature. We found two small case series reporting exclusively on malunion treatment and complications. While some of the combination studies made the distinction in the diagnosis of malunion and nonunion, they rarely differentiated the treatment outcomes between the two categories. This paper describes pelvic malunion and highlights the need for more research into surgical outcomes of treatment specifically regarding functionality, patient satisfaction, and recurrence of preoperative symptoms.
Topics: Fractures, Bone; Fractures, Malunited; Humans; Pelvic Bones
PubMed: 36013565
DOI: 10.3390/medicina58081098 -
Journal of Physiotherapy Apr 2021What is the most cost-effective way of providing pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) to prevent or treat postpartum incontinence? (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Group-based pelvic floor muscle training for all women during pregnancy is more cost-effective than postnatal training for women with urinary incontinence: cost-effectiveness analysis of a systematic review.
QUESTION
What is the most cost-effective way of providing pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) to prevent or treat postpartum incontinence?
DESIGN
Meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis of models of care included in a recent Cochrane systematic review.
PARTICIPANTS
Pregnant and postnatal women.
INTERVENTION
Supervised PFMT for preventing or treating urinary and/or faecal incontinence.
OUTCOME MEASURES
Postpartum urinary or faecal incontinence.
ANALYSIS
We examined the comparative incremental cost effectiveness of different approaches to successfully prevent or cure one case of incontinence. Costs were valued in Australian dollars using publicly available market rates and enterprise agreements as of 2019. Comparisons involving group-based treatment approaches were subject to sensitivity analyses where the numbers of patients attending each group were varied to identify thresholds where recommendations change.
RESULTS
Seventeen trials were included for meta-analysis. Three models of care were clinically effective: individually supervised PFMT during pregnancy to prevent urinary incontinence (Model 1), group-based PFMT during pregnancy to prevent or treat urinary incontinence (Model 2) and individually supervised postnatal PFMT to treat urinary incontinence and prevent or treat faecal incontinence (Model 3). The health service costs per urinary incontinence case prevented or cured were $768 for Model 1, and $1,970 for Model 3. However, Model 2 generated a cost saving of $14 if there were eight participants per session, with greater savings if more participants attend. The health service cost per faecal incontinence case prevented or cured was $2,784 (Model 3).
CONCLUSION
Providing group-based PFMT for all women during pregnancy is likely more efficient than individual PFMT for incontinent women postnatally; however, providing PFMT for postnatal women with urinary incontinence should not be discounted because of the added known benefit for preventing and treating faecal incontinence.
Topics: Australia; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Exercise Therapy; Female; Humans; Pelvic Floor; Pregnancy; Treatment Outcome; Urinary Incontinence; Urinary Incontinence, Stress
PubMed: 33771484
DOI: 10.1016/j.jphys.2021.03.001 -
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics May 2024This systematic review aims to identify, critically appraise, and summarize current evidence regarding the feasibility and efficacy of pelvic floor muscle training in... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
This systematic review aims to identify, critically appraise, and summarize current evidence regarding the feasibility and efficacy of pelvic floor muscle training in telerehabilitation.
METHODS
Three bibliographic databases, PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched from inception to October 1, 2023. Clinical trials assessing the feasibility and efficacy of pelvic floor muscle training in telerehabilitation were eligible for inclusion. The Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale and National Institutes of Health Study Quality Assessment Tool were used for methodological quality assessment. Study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment were completed by two independent reviewers. Meta-analyses were performed to determine the effects of pelvic floor muscle training in telerehabilitation.
RESULTS
Five randomized controlled trials and three single cohort clinical trials were included in this review. Four studies were evaluated as good quality, and four as fair. Pelvic floor telerehabilitation was well tolerated and demonstrated good patient compliance and satisfaction. Pooled analysis indicated significant effects of pelvic floor telerehabilitation on the severity of urinary incontinence with a large effect size, pelvic floor muscle strength with a large effect size, and quality of life with a medium effect size.
CONCLUSION
This systematic review demonstrates that pelvic floor muscle training in telerehabilitation is a feasible and effective approach and highlights its efficacy in patients with urinary incontinence. This review supports the application of pelvic floor muscle training in telerehabilitation and informs further clinical and research endeavors to incorporate digital health technologies in managing pelvic floor dysfunction.
Topics: Humans; Pelvic Floor; Quality of Life; Telerehabilitation; Urinary Incontinence; Physical Therapy Modalities; Exercise Therapy; Urinary Incontinence, Stress; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 38340157
DOI: 10.1007/s00404-024-07380-x -
International Urogynecology Journal May 2016Hormonal contraceptive use is common practice worldwide. Although the effects of hormone treatments in the pelvic region are well established, there is no clear evidence... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS
Hormonal contraceptive use is common practice worldwide. Although the effects of hormone treatments in the pelvic region are well established, there is no clear evidence regarding their effects on incontinence, bladder, bowel, vaginal and sexual symptoms in premenopausal women. We hypothesized that hormonal contraceptives affect pelvic floor function. We therefore performed a comprehensive systematic review of published studies to determine the influence of hormonal contraception on pelvic floor functions.
METHODS
Electronic literature databases were searched from database inception to March 2015. Keywords and medical subject headings searched for included terms and word variations for 'contraception', and 'bowel', 'vaginal', 'sexual' and 'urinary' symptoms. Studies were eligible if they looked at these symptoms in women taking hormonal contraception. Two reviewers independently screened studies for inclusion, and extracted data on study characteristics, quality and results. Data were combined where possible.
RESULTS
Of the 429 citations identified, 13 studies were included in the review. Data were meta-analysed where possible and presented as prevalence. The results indicate statistically significant links between interstitial cystitis and oral contraceptive use at any point (ever) (OR 2.31, 95 % CI 1.03 - 5.16; p = 0.04) and vulvar vestibulitis and current oral contraceptive use (OR 2.10, 95 % CI 1.26 - 3.49; p = 0.004). The evidence is unclear in other areas.
CONCLUSIONS
Our results indicate that oral contraceptives may have an effect on pelvic floor function. They could increase the risk of painful bladder and vulvar vestibulitis, but their effect on dyspareunia is inconsistent. However, robustly collected prospective data to establish causal associations are needed.
Topics: Contraceptive Agents, Female; Contraceptives, Oral, Hormonal; Cystitis, Interstitial; Delayed-Action Preparations; Dyspareunia; Female; Humans; Intrauterine Devices, Medicated; Levonorgestrel; Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms; Medroxyprogesterone Acetate; Pelvic Floor; Premenopause; Vulvodynia
PubMed: 26407563
DOI: 10.1007/s00192-015-2833-3 -
Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation... Sep 2018Pelvic floor fatigue is known by its clinical consequences (fecal incontinence, stress urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse), but there are still few studies on... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Pelvic floor fatigue is known by its clinical consequences (fecal incontinence, stress urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse), but there are still few studies on the subject.
OBJECTIVE
This article presents an overview of the current knowledge of pelvic and perineal fatigue, focusing on its assessment and consequences in terms of evaluation and therapeutic strategies, to propose an evaluation that could be routinely performed.
METHODS
We performed a systematic review of the literature in MEDLINE via PubMed and Cochrane Library databases by using the keywords pelvic floor, muscular fatigue, physiopathology, stress urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, fecal incontinence, physical activity, and pelvic rehabilitation. We included reports of systematic reviews and retrospective and prospective studies on adult humans and animals in English or French published up to April 2018 with no restriction on start date.
RESULTS
We selected 59 articles by keyword search, 18 by hand-search and 3 specific guidelines (including the 2009 International Continence Society recommendations); finally 45 articles were included; 14 are described in the Results section (2 reviews of 6 and 20 studies, and 12 prospective observational or cross-over studies of 5 to 317 patients including 1 of animals). Perineal fatigue can be assessed by direct assessment, electromyography and spectral analysis and during urodynamics. Because pelvic floor fatigue assessments are not evaluated routinely, this fatigability is not always identified and is often falsely considered an exclusive pelvic floor weakness, as suggested by some rehabilitation methods that also weaken the pelvic floor instead of enhancing it.
CONCLUSION
Pelvic floor fatigue is not evaluated enough on a routine basis and the assessment is heterogeneous. A better knowledge of pelvic floor fatigue by standardized routine evaluation could lead to targeted therapeutic strategies.
Topics: Fecal Incontinence; Humans; Muscle Fatigue; Muscle Strength; Pelvic Floor; Perineum; Urinary Incontinence, Stress; Urodynamics
PubMed: 30017491
DOI: 10.1016/j.rehab.2018.06.006 -
Actas Urologicas Espanolas May 2024Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a common disorder in women that has a negative impact on quality of life. Pregnancy and childbirth are considered important risk... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a common disorder in women that has a negative impact on quality of life. Pregnancy and childbirth are considered important risk factors that directly affect the pelvic floor during pregnancy and labour, increasing the risk of pelvic floor dysfunction, with prevalence rates of SUI in the postpartum period ranging from 30 to 47% during the first 12 months.
OBJECTIVE
To determine the effectiveness of pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) in the prevention of SUI in women during the antenatal and postnatal period by reviewing and evaluating the available scientific literature.
METHODS
This is a systematic review, using only randomised controlled trials. We searched the databases Pubmed, Scopus, Cochrane and PEDro. We reviewed 7 prospective studies in English and Portuguese, which included 1,401 pregnant women of legal age who underwent PFMT to prevent SUI.
RESULTS
The results allowed us to establish that PFMT is used for pelvic floor muscles and that this intervention, applied with the appropriate methodology, can prevent or cure SUI.
CONCLUSIONS
The application of PFMT in an early stage of pregnancy has positive effects on the continence capacity after delivery.
Topics: Humans; Urinary Incontinence, Stress; Female; Pelvic Floor; Exercise Therapy; Pregnancy; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Pregnancy Complications
PubMed: 38556125
DOI: 10.1016/j.acuroe.2024.01.007 -
European Urology Mar 2016Preoperative pelvic floor muscle exercise (PFME) is often prescribed to reduce the severity of postprostatectomy incontinence. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
CONTEXT
Preoperative pelvic floor muscle exercise (PFME) is often prescribed to reduce the severity of postprostatectomy incontinence.
OBJECTIVE
Systematic review and meta-analysis of evidence regarding the effect of preoperative PFME on postoperative urinary incontinence following radical prostatectomy.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION
A systematic search was performed of the Cochrane Library, Medline, Embase, and all potential articles from references in relevant articles on 4 October 2014. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. Identified reports were critically appraised for quality and relevance. Only studies of preoperative PFME compared with no preoperative PFME were included.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS
Eleven studies were included based on the selection criteria. The total number of patients included in the final analysis was 739. In seven studies, sufficient quantitative data on postoperative incontinence were available for meta-analysis. At 1 mo, there was no difference in continence rates between the groups (odds ratio [OR]: 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45-1.03). At 3 mo, there was 36% improvement in the preoperative PFME group (OR: 0.64; 95% CI, 0.47-0.88). At 6 mo, there was no difference between groups (OR: 0.60; 95% CI, 0.32-1.15). When examining quality of life measures, four of seven studies demonstrated significant improvement in the preoperative PFME group at 3 mo, and two of these studies demonstrated significant differences at 6 mo.
CONCLUSIONS
Preoperative PFME improves postoperative urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy at 3 mo but not at 6 mo, suggesting it improves early continence but not long-term continence rates.
PATIENT SUMMARY
We reviewed all evidence for preoperative pelvic floor muscle exercise (PFME) in treating urinary incontinence following radical prostatectomy. We found evidence to suggest that preoperative PFME improves early continence rates but not long-term continence rates.
Topics: Chi-Square Distribution; Exercise Therapy; Humans; Male; Odds Ratio; Pelvic Floor; Preoperative Care; Prostatectomy; Quality of Life; Risk Factors; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Urinary Incontinence
PubMed: 26610857
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.11.004 -
American Journal of Obstetrics and... Jun 2023Pelvic floor muscle tone, which includes active and passive components, is argued to be increased in many pelvic health conditions, including those involving pain. This... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
Pelvic floor muscle tone, which includes active and passive components, is argued to be increased in many pelvic health conditions, including those involving pain. This study systematically reviewed evidence for increased pelvic floor muscle tone in pelvic health conditions.
DATA SOURCES
Electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, and Embase) were searched up to May 31, 2021. The search strategy included variants of pelvic and/or floor, muscle, and tone using keywords and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms.
STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
Studies were included if they investigated increased tone of the pelvic floor muscle and reported measures of active or mechanical properties of the pelvic floor muscle in humans with any pelvic health condition, including pain, bowel, urogenital, or sexual dysfunctions. Studies of any design were included, except systematic and narrative reviews. Reference lists of studies, reviews, and book chapters were searched for additional studies.
METHODS
Data were extracted using a standardized form, including measurement tool and outcome measure. Risk of bias was analyzed using a modified ROBINS-I (Risk of Bias In Non-randomized Studies - of Interventions) tool, and a score was allocated to determine whether the study provided "convincing" interpretation (comparison with condition-free control group, valid measure, no application issues).
RESULTS
In total, 151 studies were included, reporting 8 different tools (electromyography, dynamometry, manometry, digital palpation, defecography, ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, other). The most common pelvic health condition was pelvic pain (n=16 conditions), followed by bowel and urogenital conditions. Most studies (57%) were cross-sectional. A healthy control group was infrequently included for comparison (27%). Unvalidated methods or methods applied in a manner that precluded convincing interpretation were common (94%). Of the 15 measurement tools that provided convincing evidence, 10 demonstrated greater tone in a pelvic health condition (all pain) compared with controls, and 5 showed no difference.
CONCLUSION
Despite the large literature, few studies provide convincing evidence for increased tone/overactivity of pelvic floor muscles in pelvic health conditions. Interpretation is hampered by design and measurement issues. Terminology was often inaccurate. Few studies investigate male, transgender, and pediatric groups.
Topics: Male; Humans; Child; Female; Pelvic Floor; Pelvic Pain; Electromyography; Pelvic Floor Disorders; Outcome Assessment, Health Care
PubMed: 37272325
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.10.027 -
International Urogynecology Journal Jul 2022Mouse knockout (KO) models of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) have contributed mechanistic evidence for the role of connective tissue defects, specifically impaired elastic... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS
Mouse knockout (KO) models of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) have contributed mechanistic evidence for the role of connective tissue defects, specifically impaired elastic matrix remodeling. Our objective was to summarize what mouse KO models for POP are available and what have we learned from these mouse models about the pathophysiological mechanisms of POP development.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review and reported narrative findings according to PRISMA guidelines. Two independent reviewers searched PubMed, Scopus and Embase for relevant manuscripts and conference abstracts for the time frame of January 1, 2000, to March 31, 2021. Conference abstracts were limited to the past 5 years.
RESULTS
The search strategy resulted in 294 total titles. We ultimately included 25 articles and an additional 11 conference abstracts. Five KO models have been studied: Loxl1, Fbln5, Fbln3, Hoxa11 and Upii-sv40t. Loxl1 and Fbln5 KO models have provided the most reliable and predictable POP phenotype. Loxl1 KO mice develop POP primarily from failure to heal after giving birth, whereas Fbln5 KO mice develop POP with aging. These mouse KO models have been used for a wide variety of investigations including genetic pathways involved in development of POP, biomechanical properties of the pelvic floor, elastic fiber deposition, POP therapies and the pathophysiology associated with mesh complications.
CONCLUSIONS
Mouse KO models have proved to be a valuable tool in the study of specific genes and their role in the development and progression of POP. They may be useful to study POP treatments and POP complications.
Topics: Amino Acid Oxidoreductases; Animals; Disease Models, Animal; Extracellular Matrix Proteins; Female; Mice; Mice, Knockout; Pelvic Floor; Pelvic Organ Prolapse; Pregnancy
PubMed: 35088092
DOI: 10.1007/s00192-021-05066-5 -
International Urogynecology Journal Oct 2021The Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI) and PFDI-20 have been translated and validated into several languages with different measurement property values... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS
The Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI) and PFDI-20 have been translated and validated into several languages with different measurement property values and are recommended by the International Consultation on Incontinence (ICI) as grade A for assessing pelvic floor dysfunction. Thus, the aim of the current study was to investigate the measurement properties of the PFDI and PFDI-20.
METHODS
Systematic review conducted in August 2020 through a search performed in PubMed, SCOPUS, WoS, ScienceDirect, CINAHL, and Google Scholar for studies that evaluated the measurement properties of the PFDI and PFDI-20. The data were analyzed according to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN).
RESULTS
Initially, 2857 studies were found, and 7 studies on PFDI and 25 on PFDI-20 were analyzed. The PFDI presented high quality of evidence for hypothesis testing, moderate for test-retest reliability and responsiveness, and very low quality of evidence for content validity. The PFDI-20 presented high quality of evidence for criterion validity, hypothesis testing, and responsiveness, moderate quality for test-retest reliability and measurement errors, and very low quality of evidence for content validity. It was not possible to rate the quality of evidence of the internal consistency of the PFDI and PFDI-20. No studies assessed the cross-cultural validity.
CONCLUSION
Only the hypothesis testing presented high quality of evidence for the PFDI. Criterion validity, hypothesis testing, and responsiveness presented a high quality of evidence for the PFDI-20. Due to the high degree of recommendation of the PFDI and PFDI-20 given by the ICI, further studies are needed to reevaluate all the measurement properties of these instruments.
Topics: Humans; Pelvic Floor; Pelvic Floor Disorders; Reproducibility of Results; Surveys and Questionnaires; Urinary Incontinence
PubMed: 33710430
DOI: 10.1007/s00192-021-04748-4