-
Current Urology Reports Aug 2023We wanted to analyse the outcomes of surgical (SWL, URS, PCNL) and medical management of cystine stones in the paediatric population in terms of stone-free status and... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE OF REVIEW
We wanted to analyse the outcomes of surgical (SWL, URS, PCNL) and medical management of cystine stones in the paediatric population in terms of stone-free status and complication rates, based on all the available literature evidence.
RECENT FINDINGS
A systematic review of literature was performed for all studies with paediatric cystine stone management. Twelve studies met the eligibility criteria, of which 4 analysed outcomes of SWL, 2 of URS and 3 of PCNL and 3 focused on the effect of either alkalising agents (potassium citrate, citric acid) or cysteine-binding thiol (CBT) agents (tiopronin, penicillamine). The reported SFR in studies ranged from 50 to 83%, 59 to 100% and 63 to 80.6%, with a complication rate of 2.8-51%, 14-27% and 12.9-15.4% with SWL, URS and PCNL, respectively. Paediatric cystine stones treatment should aim at complete stone clearance, preservation of renal function and prevention of further recurrences. SWL achieves inferior results in case of cystine stones. URS and PCNL are safe and effective procedures in the paediatric population, with a low rate of major complications. Adherence to medical prevention therapies may prolong recurrence-free periods.
Topics: Humans; Child; Kidney Calculi; Cystine; Lithotripsy; Ureteroscopy; Ureteral Calculi; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37079195
DOI: 10.1007/s11934-023-01162-9 -
Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism Aug 2024Drug-induced dermatomyositis (DIDM) is a rare and underestimated variant of dermatomyositis (DM) characterized by muscle damage and skin rash and related to certain drug... (Review)
Review
Drug-induced dermatomyositis (DIDM) is a rare and underestimated variant of dermatomyositis (DM) characterized by muscle damage and skin rash and related to certain drug exposure. The spectrum of drugs causing DIDM has evolved over time, originally implicating hydroxyurea, penicillamine, and statins as causative agents. Tumor necrosis factor α inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors have also been associated with such conditions. To bridge the gap between current literature and clinical practice, and therefore guide clinicians, we conducted a comprehensive review of English literature from Pubmed, EMBASE, and MEDLINE. Our analysis included demographic data, clinical features, laboratory findings, therapeutic outcomes, and extant research pertaining to the probable pathogenesis of DIDM induced by various drugs. Furthermore, we categorized the drugs involved in DIDM cases into biologics and traditional agents for subsequent statistical analysis. Over time, there has been a gradual accumulation of reported DIDM cases. A total of 69 published DIDM cases were documented in our study, among which 33 should be attributed to biologics and the remaining 36 to traditional drugs. Interestingly, 41 of all DIDM cases had a previous history of malignancies. Additionally, DIDM cases exhibited similar cutaneous and muscular manifestations to classic DM, with the exception of cases induced by hydroxyurea, which did not entail muscle damage. Positive antinuclear antibodies and anti-TIF1-γ autoantibodies have been predominantly observed in biologics-induced cases, while positive anti-TIF1-γ antibodies were merely reported in the cases that were primarily diagnosed with malignant diseases and exposed to ICIs afterwards. Anti-TIF1-γ antibodies may potentially serve as a red flag in the identification of co-existing malignant diseases in DM patients. We also provided a comprehensive summary and exploration of potential mechanisms lying behind drug-induced dermatomyositis. In conclusion, our review consolidates the current literature on DIDM, highlighting the evolving spectrum of medications and elucidating the differences in clinical manifestations, laboratory findings, and underlying mechanisms.
Topics: Dermatomyositis; Humans; Biological Products
PubMed: 38833729
DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2024.152478 -
Oncotarget Sep 2015Most comprehensive treatments for PBC include UDCA, combination of methotrexate (MTX), corticosteroids (COT), colchicine (COC) or bezafibrate (BEF), cyclosporin A (CYP),... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
Most comprehensive treatments for PBC include UDCA, combination of methotrexate (MTX), corticosteroids (COT), colchicine (COC) or bezafibrate (BEF), cyclosporin A (CYP), D-penicillamine (DPM), methotrexate (MTX), or azathioprine (AZP). Since the optimum treatment regimen remains inconclusive, we aimed to compare these therapies in terms of patient mortality or liver transplantation (MOLT) and adverse event (AE).
METHODS
We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials until August 2014. We estimated HRs for MOLT and ORs for AE. The sensitivity analysis based on dose of UDCA was also performed.
RESULTS
The search identified 49 studies involving 12 different treatment regimens and 4182 patients. Although no statistical significance can be found in MOLT, COT plus UDCA was ranked highest for efficacy outcome amongst all the treatment regimes. While for AEs, compared with OBS or UDCA, monotherapy with COC (OR 5.6, P < 0.001; OR 5.89, P < 0.001), CYP (OR 3.24, P < 0.001; OR 3.42, P < 0.001), DPM (OR 8.00, P < 0.001; OR 8.45, P < 0.001) and MTX (OR 5.31, P < 0.001; OR 5.61, P < 0.001) were associated with statistically significant increased risk of AEs. No significant differences were found for other combination regimes. Effect estimates from indirect comparisons matched closely to estimates derived from pairwise comparisons. Consistently, in the sensitivity analysis, results closely resembled our primary analysis.
CONCLUSIONS
COT plus UDCA was the most efficacious among treatment regimens both for MOLT and AEs.
Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Adult; Aged; Azathioprine; Bezafibrate; Bile Ducts; Colchicine; Cyclosporine; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Liver Cirrhosis, Biliary; Male; Methotrexate; Middle Aged; Penicillamine; Treatment Outcome; Ursodeoxycholic Acid
PubMed: 26109432
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.4528 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Mar 2017Primary biliary cholangitis (previously primary biliary cirrhosis) is a chronic liver disease caused by the destruction of small intra-hepatic bile ducts resulting in... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Primary biliary cholangitis (previously primary biliary cirrhosis) is a chronic liver disease caused by the destruction of small intra-hepatic bile ducts resulting in stasis of bile (cholestasis), liver fibrosis, and liver cirrhosis. The optimal pharmacological treatment of primary biliary cholangitis remains uncertain.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the comparative benefits and harms of different pharmacological interventions in the treatment of primary biliary cholangitis through a network meta-analysis and to generate rankings of the available pharmacological interventions according to their safety and efficacy. However, it was not possible to assess whether the potential effect modifiers were similar across different comparisons. Therefore, we did not perform the network meta-analysis, and instead, assessed the comparative benefits and harms of different interventions using standard Cochrane methodology.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2017, Issue 2), MEDLINE, Embase, Science Citation Index Expanded, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and randomised controlled trials registers to February 2017 to identify randomised clinical trials on pharmacological interventions for primary biliary cholangitis.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included only randomised clinical trials (irrespective of language, blinding, or publication status) in participants with primary biliary cholangitis. We excluded trials which included participants who had previously undergone liver transplantation. We considered any of the various pharmacological interventions compared with each other or with placebo or no intervention.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) and rate ratio with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using both fixed-effect and random-effects models based on available-participant analysis with Review Manager 5. We assessed risk of bias according to Cochrane, controlled risk of random errors with Trial Sequential Analysis, and assessed the quality of the evidence using GRADE.
MAIN RESULTS
We identified 74 trials including 5902 participants that met the inclusion criteria of this review. A total of 46 trials (4274 participants) provided information for one or more outcomes. All the trials were at high risk of bias in one or more domains. Overall, all the evidence was low or very low quality. The proportion of participants with symptoms varied from 19.9% to 100% in the trials that reported this information. The proportion of participants who were antimitochondrial antibody (AMA) positive ranged from 80.8% to 100% in the trials that reported this information. It appeared that most trials included participants who had not received previous treatments or included participants regardless of the previous treatments received. The follow-up in the trials ranged from 1 to 96 months.The proportion of people with mortality (maximal follow-up) was higher in the methotrexate group versus the no intervention group (OR 8.83, 95% CI 1.01 to 76.96; 60 participants; 1 trial; low quality evidence). The proportion of people with mortality (maximal follow-up) was lower in the azathioprine group versus the no intervention group (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.98; 224 participants; 2 trials; I = 0%; low quality evidence). However, it has to be noted that a large proportion of participants (25%) was excluded from the trial that contributed most participants to this analysis and the results were not reliable. There was no evidence of a difference in any of the remaining comparisons. The proportion of people with serious adverse events was higher in the D-penicillamine versus no intervention group (OR 28.77, 95% CI 1.57 to 526.67; 52 participants; 1 trial; low quality evidence). The proportion of people with serious adverse events was higher in the obeticholic acid plus ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) group versus the UDCA group (OR 3.58, 95% CI 1.02 to 12.51; 216 participants; 1 trial; low quality evidence). There was no evidence of a difference in any of the remaining comparisons for serious adverse events (proportion) or serious adverse events (number of events). None of the trials reported health-related quality of life at any time point.
FUNDING
nine trials had no special funding or were funded by hospital or charities; 31 trials were funded by pharmaceutical companies; and 34 trials provided no information on source of funding.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Based on very low quality evidence, there is currently no evidence that any intervention is beneficial for primary biliary cholangitis. However, the follow-up periods in the trials were short and there is significant uncertainty in this issue. Further well-designed randomised clinical trials are necessary. Future randomised clinical trials ought to be adequately powered; performed in people who are generally seen in the clinic rather than in highly selected participants; employ blinding; avoid post-randomisation dropouts or planned cross-overs; should have sufficient follow-up period (e.g. five or 10 years or more); and use clinically important outcomes such as mortality, health-related quality of life, cirrhosis, decompensated cirrhosis, and liver transplantation. Alternatively, very large groups of participants should be randomised to facilitate shorter trial duration.
Topics: Azathioprine; Chenodeoxycholic Acid; Cholagogues and Choleretics; Cholangitis; Chronic Disease; Colchicine; Cyclosporine; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Methotrexate; Mitochondria; Network Meta-Analysis; Penicillamine; Quality of Life; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ursodeoxycholic Acid
PubMed: 28350426
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011648.pub2 -
Life (Basel, Switzerland) Aug 2023Wilson's disease (WD) is a genetic disorder with copper accumulation in various tissues leading to related clinical symptoms (mainly hepatic and neuropsychiatric) which...
Wilson's disease (WD) is a genetic disorder with copper accumulation in various tissues leading to related clinical symptoms (mainly hepatic and neuropsychiatric) which can be in 85% of patients successfully treated with anti-copper agents. However, during WD treatment neurological deterioration may occur in several patients. D-penicillamine (DPA) is one of the most frequently used drugs in WD treatment. Despite its efficacy, DPA can produce many adverse drug reactions, which should be recognized early. We present the case of a 51-year-old man diagnosed with the hepatic form of WD and initially treated with DPA in whom after 15 months of treatment, diplopia and evening ptosis occurred. WD treatment non-compliance as well as overtreatment were excluded. Supported by neurological symptoms, a positive edrophonium test, and high serum levels of antibodies against acetylcholine receptors (AChR-Abs), as well as low concentrations of antibodies against muscle-specific kinase (MuSK-Abs), the diagnosis of myasthenia gravis (MG), induced by DPA, was established. DPA was stopped; zinc sulfate for WD and pyridostigmine for MG symptoms were introduced. Diplopia and ptosis subsided after a few days, which supported our diagnosis. During a follow-up visit after 6 months, the patient did not present any MG symptoms. AChR-Abs level gradually decreased and MuSK-Abs were no longer detected. Pyridostigmine was stopped, and within 9 months of follow-up, the neurological symptoms of MG did not reoccur. The authors discussed the patient's neurological deterioration, performed a systematic review of DPA-induced MG in WD and concluded that MG is a rare and usually reversible complication of DPA treatment. DPA-induced MG generally occurs 2-12 months after treatment initiation and ocular symptoms predominate. Response to pyridostigmine treatment is good and MG symptoms usually reverse within one year after DPA treatment cessation. However, symptoms may persist in some cases where DPA treatment is only a trigger factor for MG occurrence.
PubMed: 37629572
DOI: 10.3390/life13081715 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Mar 2017Primary sclerosing cholangitis is a chronic cholestatic liver disease that is associated with both hepatobiliary and colorectal malignancies, which can result in liver... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Primary sclerosing cholangitis is a chronic cholestatic liver disease that is associated with both hepatobiliary and colorectal malignancies, which can result in liver cirrhosis and its complications. The optimal pharmacological treatment for patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis remains controversial.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the comparative benefits and harms of different pharmacological interventions in people with primary sclerosing cholangitis by performing a network meta-analysis, and to generate rankings of available pharmacological interventions according to their safety and efficacy. Given that it was not possible to assess whether potential effect modifiers were similar across comparisons, we did not perform the network meta-analysis but instead used standard Cochrane methods.When trials begin to provide an adequate description of potential effect modifiers, we will attempt to conduct network meta-analysis.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Science Citation Index - Expanded, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and randomised controlled trials registers until February 2017 to identify randomised clinical trials (RCT) on pharmacological interventions for primary sclerosing cholangitis.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included only RCTs, irrespective of language, blinding, or publication status, in which participants were given a diagnosis of primary sclerosing cholangitis. We excluded trials that included previously liver-transplanted participants. We considered any of various pharmacological interventions compared with one other or with placebo. We excluded trials that compared different doses of various pharmacological interventions or that reported different treatment durations, except for ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA). As UDCA is the drug most commonly investigated for primary sclerosing cholangitis, we performed a second analysis in which we stratified the dose of UDCA.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We calculated the odds ratio and the rate ratio with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using both fixed-effect and random-effects models based on available-participant analysis with Review Manager. We assessed risk of bias according to Cochrane, controlled risk of random errors with Trial Sequential Analysis, and assessed the quality of the evidence using GRADE.
MAIN RESULTS
We identified 22 RCTs in which 1211 participants were randomised to 13 different interventions. Most were placebo-controlled trials. Trials had few restrictions apart from an established diagnosis of primary sclerosing cholangitis, evidence of cholestasis, absence of decompensated liver disease, and absence of malignancy. However, some trials included symptomatic participants only, and others included both symptomatic and asymptomatic participants. A total of 11 RCTs (706 participants) provided data for one or more outcomes. The period of follow-up ranged from three months to three years in most trials. Only three trials reported follow-up longer than three years. Investigators found no evidence of differences in important clinical benefits such as reduction in mortality at maximal follow-up and improvement in health-related quality of life. Primary outcomes Mortality: Effect estimates: colchicine versus placebo: odds ratio 0.44, 95% CI 0.04 to 5.07, participants = 84, one trial; penicillamine versus placebo: odds ratio 1.18, 95% CI 0.39 to 3.58, participants = 70, one trial; steroids versus placebo: odds ratio 3.00, 95% CI 0.10 to 90.96, participants = 11, one trial; ursodeoxycholic acid versus placebo: odds ratio 1.51, 95% CI 0.63 to 3.63, participants = 348, two trials, I = 0%; vancomycin versus placebo: not estimable because no events in either group, participants = 29, one trial. Serious adverse events (proportion): Effect estimates: infliximab versus placebo: odds ratio not estimable (because of zero events in both arms), participants = 7, one trial; steroids versus placebo: odds ratio 20.00, 95% CI 0.93 to 429.90, participants = 11, one trial; vancomycin versus placebo: not estimable because no events in either group, participants = 29, one trial. Serious adverse events (number): Effect estimates: infliximab versus placebo: rate ratio 0.80, 95% CI 0.02 to 40.44, participants = 7, one trial; penicillamine versus placebo: rate ratio 13.60, 95% CI 0.78 to 237.83, participants = 70, one trial; steroids versus placebo: rate ratio 3.32, 95% CI 0.71 to 15.62, participants = 11, one trial. Adverse events (proportion): Effect estimates: steroids versus placebo: odds ratio 20.00, 95% CI 0.93 to 429.90, participants = 11, one trial; ursodeoxycholic acid versus placebo: odds ratio 1.22, 95% CI 0.68 to 2.17, participants = 198, one trial; vancomycin versus placebo: not estimable because no events in either group, participants = 29, one trial. Adverse events (number): Effect estimates: cyclosporin versus placebo: rate ratio 2.64, 95% CI 0.99 to 7.03, participants = 26, one trial; steroids versus placebo: rate ratio 3.32, 95% CI 0.71 to 15.62, participants = 11, one trial; ursodeoxycholic acid plus metronidazole versus ursodeoxycholic acid: rate ratio 2.36, 95% CI 0.98 to 5.71, participants = 71, one trial. Health-related quality of life: ursodeoxycholic acid versus placebo: mean difference 1.30, 95% CI -5.61 to 8.21, participants = 198, one trial (Short Form (SF)-36 General Health Scale). Secondary outcomes Studies provided no evidence of differences in clinical benefits such as a reduction in the requirement for liver transplantation or a reduction in the incidence proportion of cholangiocarcinoma. One small trial (29 participants) comparing vancomycin versus placebo reported no malignancies, no liver decompensation, and no liver transplantation in either group after a very short follow-up period of 12 weeks after treatment. None of the remaining trials clearly reported other clinical benefits such as decreased development of all malignancies, colorectal cancer, liver decompensation, time to liver decompensation, time to liver transplantation, or requirement for cholecystectomy to allow comparisons between different interventions.
SOURCE OF FUNDING
Fifteen trials reported the source of funding; three were funded by parties without vested interest in results of the trial, and 12 were funded in part or in full by drug companies.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Evidence is currently insufficient to show differences in effectiveness measures such as mortality, health-related quality of life, cirrhosis, or liver transplantation between any active pharmacological intervention and no intervention. However, trials were at high risk of bias and included small numbers of participants, had short follow-up periods, and reported few clinical outcomes. An urgent need exists to identify an effective medical treatment for primary sclerosing cholangitis through well-designed RCTs with adequate follow-up that aim to identify differences in outcomes important to people with primary sclerosing cholangitis.
PubMed: 28417463
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011343.pub2 -
Liver International : Official Journal... Nov 2019Wilson disease (WD) is a rare disorder of copper metabolism. The objective of this systematic review was to determine the comparative effectiveness and safety of common... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND & AIMS
Wilson disease (WD) is a rare disorder of copper metabolism. The objective of this systematic review was to determine the comparative effectiveness and safety of common treatments of WD.
METHODS
We included WD patients of any age or stage and the study drugs D-penicillamine, zinc salts, trientine and tetrathiomolybdate. The control could be placebo, no treatment or any other treatment. We included prospective, retrospective, randomized and non-randomized studies. We searched Medline and Embase via Ovid, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and screened reference lists of included articles. Where possible, we applied random-effects meta-analyses.
RESULTS
The 23 included studies reported on 2055 patients and mostly compared D-penicillamine to no treatment, zinc, trientine or succimer. One study compared tetrathiomolybdate and trientine. Post-decoppering maintenance therapy was addressed in one study only. Eleven of 23 studies were of low quality. When compared to no treatment, D-penicillamine was associated with a lower mortality (odds ratio 0.013; 95% CI 0.0010 to 0.17). When compared to zinc, there was no association with mortality (odds ratio 0.73; 95% CI 0.16 to 3.40) and prevention or amelioration of clinical symptoms (odds ratio 0.84; 95% CI 0.48 to 1.48). Conversely, D-penicillamine may have a greater impact on side effects and treatment discontinuations than zinc.
CONCLUSIONS
There are some indications that zinc is safer than D-penicillamine therapy while being similarly effective in preventing or reducing hepatic or neurological WD symptoms. Study quality was low warranting cautious interpretation of our findings.
Topics: Chelating Agents; Copper; Hepatolenticular Degeneration; Humans; Liver; Molybdenum; Penicillamine; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Trientine; Zinc
PubMed: 31206982
DOI: 10.1111/liv.14179 -
European Journal of Dermatology : EJD Aug 2018Elastosis perforans serpiginosa (EPS) is an uncommon cutaneous disorder classified under perforating diseases (PD); a group of dermatoses with transepidermal extrusion...
BACKGROUND
Elastosis perforans serpiginosa (EPS) is an uncommon cutaneous disorder classified under perforating diseases (PD); a group of dermatoses with transepidermal extrusion of collagen or elastic tissue. Three EPS subtypes have been reported that differ according to aetiology, associated diseases, and histopathological features. Herein, we report a systematic review of the literature, as well as a case of a 41-year-old woman with Wilson disease treated with penicillamine (PCM), who developed EPS after 11 years of drug intake.
OBJECTIVES
To analyse and characterise EPS subtypes based on an evaluation of potential different histological patterns.
MATERIALS & METHODS
A systematic literature search in Pubmed was performed to identify articles describing EPS.
RESULTS
A peculiar histological pattern was identified in EPS PCM-related patients, either in affected or unaffected skin samples. Using specific elastic fibre stains (Verhoeff-van Gieson, Weigert, and Orcein), fibres appeared with an irregular surface with thorn-like protrusion, probably due to weaker fibre cross-links, making them unable to re-expand after contraction along their long axis. Interestingly, similar histological patterns have also been reported in elastic tissues of vessel walls of the lungs and upper respiratory tract, joints, visceral adventitia, and kidney.
CONCLUSIONS
A distinctive histological pattern of PCM-related EPS is observed in affected and normal-appearing skin, as well as extracutaneous elastic tissue, suggesting serious potential widespread drug-induced systemic elastolytic damage.
Topics: Adult; Animals; Chelating Agents; Female; Hepatolenticular Degeneration; Humans; Penicillamine; Skin Diseases
PubMed: 30129530
DOI: 10.1684/ejd.2018.3355 -
Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica = the... Aug 2020To systematically review the effect of additional drug therapy as metaphylaxis in patients with cystinuria.
INTRODUCTION
To systematically review the effect of additional drug therapy as metaphylaxis in patients with cystinuria.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION
A literature search of three databases (MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library) was performed according to the PRISMA-guidelines enclosing articles published up to May 2019. A total of 1117 articles were screened. Thirty-four publications met the inclusion criteria for this review.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS
Male-female ratio in the studied cohorts was 49.9% - 50.1%. The majority of studies showed a positive effect in reducing stone events and/or urinary cystine excretion. D-Penicillamine showed success in 13/14 (92%) studies, whereas Tiopronin-treatment showed a reduction in all (8/8; 100%) studies. All studies on Captopril (4/4) showed a decrease, however not all significant. The same is true for studies on Thiols in combination with Captopril (2/2). Furthermore, Tiopronin showed less side effects compared to D-penicillamine, respectively 30% and 37%. Captopril showed the least adverse events, with one event in nine patients.
CONCLUSIONS
The evidence on benefit of additional drug therapy in patients with cystinuria is scarce. All studied medications showed an effect on stone event and urinary cystine excretion, when used in addition to hyperhydration, alkalization and a diet low on methionine. Based on this systematic review, no drug can be preferred over another. An important aspect in the choice of drug is the risk of side effects. Therefore, the choice of additional drug should be personalized for every patient where the risk of side effects should be taken into consideration.
Topics: Captopril; Cystine; Cystinuria; Drug Therapy, Combination; Evidence-Based Medicine; Female; Humans; Male; Penicillamine; Tiopronin
PubMed: 32083421
DOI: 10.23736/S0393-2249.20.03704-2 -
Clinical and Experimental Dermatology May 2024Lipoid proteinosis (LP), also known as Urbach-Wiethe disease, is a rare autosomal recessive genodermatosis, caused by mutations in the ECM1 gene. This results in the...
BACKGROUND
Lipoid proteinosis (LP), also known as Urbach-Wiethe disease, is a rare autosomal recessive genodermatosis, caused by mutations in the ECM1 gene. This results in the deposition of periodic acid-Schiff (PAS)-positive, hyaline-like material on the skin, mucosae and internal organs.
OBJECTIVES
To present a case report of LP and a systematic review to synthesize the scientific literature on the management of this uncommon and frequently missed diagnosis.
METHODS
We present a case report of a 48-year-old man with LP who exhibited significant improvement after oral acitretin therapy. To address the lack of large case-control studies on LP treatment, we performed a systematic review of the literature following the PRISMA 2020 criteria. The search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane and Scopus databases from inception until June 2023. To assess the methodological quality of case reports and case series, we used the Joanna Briggs Collaboration critical appraisal tool.
RESULTS
We included 25 studies that met eligibility criteria. Data from 44 patients with a histopathologically confirmed diagnosis were analysed. Treatment ranged from systemic therapies (acitretin, etretinate, dimethyl sulfoxide, corticosteroids, penicillamine) to surgical or laser procedures. Regarding methodological quality, the main discrepancies arose in the reporting of participant characteristics and treatment interventions.
CONCLUSIONS
Low-dose oral acitretin could have potential in managing LP, exhibiting fewer side-effects compared with other therapeutic agents. Further research is needed to establish more comprehensive and evidence-based treatment guidelines.
Topics: Humans; Lipoid Proteinosis of Urbach and Wiethe; Male; Acitretin; Middle Aged; Keratolytic Agents; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 38308656
DOI: 10.1093/ced/llae039